Stock Market Needn’t Be Fearful Of Negative Payrolls

Stock Market Needn’t Be Fearful Of Negative Payrolls

Authored by Simon White, Bloomberg macro strategist,

The monthly payrolls report is unlikely to be negative for a few months yet, but when it does, stocks typically perform better overall than when prints are positive.

Leading data continue to project the downwards trend in annual payrolls growth persisting.

For instance, the sharp drop in banks’ willingness to extend consumer credit is a building headwind in the coming months.

If payrolls growth continues to decay at the rate it has over the last six months, we would get the first negative monthly change in December. However, it could come quicker if the decay rate increases (as the chart above suggests could happen).

Moreover, temporary help is already contracting on an annual basis and average weekly hours worked continues to fall, suggesting employers are running out of options before they have to start laying workers off. This sort of dynamic means job losses can rise quickly as pressures have been building under the surface.

Nonetheless, negative payrolls have historically not been bad for equities. Consider the times when the 3-month moving average of the first estimate of the monthly change in payrolls is negative, and look at forward S&P returns. We find that on different horizons (5, 10, 30 and 60 day), the S&P outperforms its mean full-sample return over each period.

It’s thus the opposite case when payrolls is positive. Over each horizon, the forward return in the S&P is less than its full-sample return.

It’s not necessarily the first negative payrolls print that does the most damage to equities (unless it was wildly unexpected), but the big unanticipated drops lower. Jobs data is heavily lagging, and by the time monthly payrolls is firmly in negative territory (i.e. the 3-month MA is negative), stocks have historically moved on, and are beginning to anticipate the upswing.

As mentioned above, today’s print is highly unlikely to be negative. But we should be alert to a downwards miss (August does have some form in that department). And if it was big enough, knee-jerk selling could overwhelm any “good news is bad news” dynamic in the shorter term.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/01/2023 – 08:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/X1zOqsV Tyler Durden

Futures Rise, Yields Dip Ahead Of August Jobs Data

Futures Rise, Yields Dip Ahead Of August Jobs Data

Futures and global markets are higher ahead of the NFP today at 8:30am ET (full preview here). At 7:40am ET, S&P futures rose 0.3% to 4,531 with Nasdaq futures up 0.2%. Major global markets are also higher, led by the UK (UKX +0.5%, SX5E +0.4%, SXXP +0.4%, DAX +0.1%), with the final Eurozone Mfg PMI is revised lower to 43.5 from 43.7, further boosting odds the ECB is done. On September ECB, Greg Fuzesi thinks that the July minutes and Isabel Schnabel’s comments yesterday (“growth had “moderated visibly”) both consistent with a pause in September ECB. He expects the final hike to happen in October after a pause in September. China reduced banks’ reserve requirement of foreign currency deposits, boosting the yuan, while China’s Caixin Mfg PMIsurprised to the upside: 51.0 vs. 49.0 survey vs. 49.2 prior. Bond yields are lower and the Bloomberg dollar index is flat. Commodities are mostly stronger led by oil. Key macro focus will be the labor data release today (NFP, Unemployment Rate, Avg. Hourly Earnings, Labor Force Participation) at 8.30am ET and the Mfg ISM at 10am ET.

In premarket trading, Broadcom dropped as much as 4.6% after its revenue forecast disappointed, signaling that demand for electronic components remains sluggish. Dell Technologies jumped 10% after it reported better-than-expected second-quarter revenue, driven by personal computers and data center hardware sales.  US-listed Chinese stocks advanced in premarket trading after Beijing and Shanghai both eased housing rules, a sign of further government support toward the economy. Here are some other notable premarket movers:

  • 23andMe jumps 19% after it received FDA 510(k) clearance to report an additional 41 genetic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes that increase risk for breast, ovarian, prostate and pancreatic cancer.
  • Elastic rises 17% after its first-quarter results beat expectations and full-year forecast was raised.
  • Eos Energy Enterprises soars 50% after announcing that the Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office has issued an up to $398.6 million conditional commitment to the battery startup.
  • Lululemon gains 3% as analysts lift their price targets on the the athleisure firm that boosted its net revenue guidance after the close on Thursday.
  • MongoDB rallies 6.4% after a 55% boost to full-year EPS guidance at mid-point of the outlook range, prompting analysts to raise price targets.
  • Nutanix jumps 18% as guidance beat expectations. Analysts noted a strong performance in renewals and a share buyback worth $350 million.
  • SentinelOne gains 2% after estimate-beating results and raised guidance eased investor fears over competition.
  • Shares in marijuana companies advanced as the Drug Enforcement Agency said Wednesday it would review its classification of cannabis. Canopy Growth gains 12%, Tilray Brands (TLRY) rises 3%, Aurora Cannabis (ACB) is up 2.5%.
  • Tingo Group falls 14% as short seller Hindenburg Research posted a message about the agri-fintech firm on X.

Friday’s payrolls report (previewed here) should provide further evidence of cooling in the still-tight US labor market. The question is whether that will be enough to stall the Federal Reserve’s tightening cycle or even lead to early rate cuts. Meanwhile, a rapidly weakening economy is likely to tilt the European Central Bank in favor of a pause this month, with no further hikes beyond the current rate of 3.75%, according to Morgan Stanley economists.

Consensus expects a 170K NFP print with unemployment unchanged at 3.5%, and average hourly earnings dropping to 4.3% YoY from 4.4%. Here is a breakdown of payrolls forecasts by bank:

  • 215,000 – Societe Generale
  • 200,000 – Barclays
  • 200,000 – UBS
  • 175,000 – HSBC
  • 170,000 – Credit Suisse
  • 160,000 – Wells Fargo
  • 155,000 – Morgan Stanley
  • 150,000 – Deutsche Bank
  • 149,000 – Goldman Sachs
  • 130,000 – Citigroup
  • 125,000 – JP Morgan Chase

“I’m personally more inclined toward the soft landing scenario given the resilience of the labor market and inflation slowing down, so I’m not expecting any catastrophic numbers this afternoon,” said Harry Wolhandler, head of equities at Meeschaert Asset Management in Paris. “In any event, should there be bad surprises, the Fed now has room for maneuver to lower rates.”

The Stoxx Europe 600 index rose 0.3%, trimming a bigger gain earlier in the session, with energy majors outperforming as crude oil headed for the biggest weekly advance since April. Miners jumped as China’s latest stimulus measures boosted prices of some industrial metals. Car makers declined, with Renault SA and Volkswagen AG falling more than 3% each after being downgraded to sell by UBS Group AG on increasing competition from Asia. Aurubis AG slumped as much as 18% after Europe’s top copper producer said it faces large losses due to a massive metal theft. Here are the other notable European movers:

  • Johnson Matthey jumps as much as 14% after Standard Investments, the investment arm of US company Standard Industries, doubles its stake in the British chemicals maker
  • Vestas gains as much as 3.8% after the wind-turbine manufacturer announced it is close to landing a large order to deliver turbines for a US wind park, a potential respite for the beleaguered industry
  • European energy stocks outperform after the sector is double-upgraded to overweight at Morgan Stanley, predicting an extended period of strong free cash flow, buybacks and dividend growth
  • WH Smith gains as much as 4.3% after Goodbody upgraded its recommendation on the UK newsagent and bookstore chain to buy, citing “encouraging momentum” going into the new fiscal year
  • Boohoo shares rise as much as 10% on Friday, on track for their biggest weekly advance since Nov. 11, after Frasers increases its stake in the online fast fashion retailer
  • Fielmann Group rises as much as 6.3% after the eyewear company raised its full-year guidance after its recent acquisition of SVS Vision amid what AlsterResearch sees as an attractive market.
  • AmRest Holdings rise as much as 3.5% after the Polish restaurant operator reported better-than-expected 2Q earnings and gave positive outlook on current trading
  • Aurubis slumps as much as 18% after Europe’s top copper producer releases an update identifying a large metal theft. Salzgitter, which has a 30% stake in Aurubis, drops 7.3% as it suspends guidance
  • Renault and Volkswagen decline after both carmakers were cut to sell and given Street-low price targets by UBS, which cites the impact from factors including the rise of Chinese automakers
  • BioMerieux falls as much as 7.7% after the French diagnostics firm’s second-quarter Ebit slightly missed estimates due to negative currency and M&A effects, overshadowing a beat on overall sales

Earlier in the session, Asian stocks advanced and headed for their second weekly gain, as Chinese equities climbed following more stimulus measures from Beijing. Japan’s benchmark also rose, eyeing an historic milestone. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index rose as much as 0.5%, led higher by Samsung and several Japanese firms.

China shares traded higher and metals looked set to extend this week’s advances after China’s government allowed the nation’s largest cities to cut down payments for home buyers and encouraged lenders to lower rates on existing mortgages as well as on deposits. Meanwhile, Shanghai and Beijing eased home-buying mortgage rules for residents. Hong Kong’s market was shut as the city braced for what may be the strongest storm to hit in at least five years.

The yuan also strengthened after China’s central bank reduced the foreign exchange reserve requirement ratio for financial institutions in a bid to support the currency. The currency has since pared its gains. Sentiment was further buoyed by an unexpected rise in manufacturing data that advanced to 51 in August, the highest reading since February, according to a Caixin survey.

Japan’s Topix benchmark gained nearly 1%, boosted by Sony, putting it on course for its highest close since 1990. The index posted its eighth consecutive month of increase in August — the longest winning streak since 2013 — and the gauge was now set for the best weekly advance since October. Data earlier showed companies’ profits rose 11.6% on an annual basis in the second quarter.

Australia’s ASX 200 declined further under 7,300 and was weighted by its metals names as Fortescue Metals slumped after its CFO left three days after the CEO’s departure. Korea’s KOSPI was underpinned by the South Korean trade data which printed better than feared.

Indian stocks posted their biggest advance in two months on Friday as metals and utilities led the rally across sectors after strong economic data boosted investor sentiment. The S&P BSE Sensex Index rose 0.9% to 65,387.16 in Mumbai, while the NSE Nifty 50 Index advanced by a similar measure as both gauges surged the most since June 30. The sharp move pushed the benchmarks by at least 0.7% higher for the week, snapping their retreat for preceding five weeks. Stocks in India have been receiving a chunk of foreign flows coming to emerging markets. For August, foreigners bought $1.6 billion of local shares while selling Taiwan, South Korea and Indonesia, and extending a selloff in China.

In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index was little changed on Friday but down 0.2% this week, set to halt six straight weeks of gains after data showed the Federal Reserve’s preferred measure of underlying inflation posted the smallest back-to-back increases since late 2020. Focus now is on US payrolls data later on Friday, which is expected to show the US labor market likely cooled in August

Further dollar declines could be limited. “The path to more pronounced dollar depreciation — further moderation in the US economic data, including nonfarm payrolls report, combined with less negativity abroad — has been narrowing lately,” wrote Goldman Sachs strategist Karen Fishman, and since Goldman’s sellside desk is always wrong, it means the dollar is about to crater.

  • EUR/USD recouped some lost ground ahead of the key US data. The common currency fell yesterday after bearish comments from European Central Bank officials fueled concern the euro region may be heading for stagflation.
  • USD/JPY little changed at 145.49. The pair recovered from an intraday low of 145.24 after Japanese Finance Minister Shunichi Suzuki said sudden moves in the foreign currency market aren’t desirable, and he will closely watch movements
  • A 0.3% rise in the Aussie dollar on China’s FX RRR cut was reversed in part by leveraged selling shortly after by weak domestic home loan data. Move extended under weight of early London names selling to partially fill in option and exporter related bids under 0.6450 strikes, according to traders

In rates, treasuries were mixed in early US trading ahead of the August employment report, with the curve steeper. With Fed swaps pricing in about 50% odds of another rate hike this year, report is anticipated to show 170k nonfarm payrolls increase, smallest in more than two years; crowd-sourced whisper number is 155k. Yields remain within 2bp of Thursday’s closing levels; Thursday’s ranges included weekly lows for 10-year to 30-year tenors. 2s10s and 5s30s spreads are wider by 2bp-3bp, paced by curve-steepening in most euro-zone bond markets. The economic calendar also includes August final S&P Global US Manufacturing PMI at 9:45am, July construction spending and August ISM manufacturing at 10am and August vehicle sales throughout the day.

In commodities, oil is set for a weekly gain after Russia signaled that it would extend export curbs and US inventories dropped further. Gold headed for the second weekly advance.

Looking to the day ahead now, and the main highlight will be the US jobs report for August. Otherwise, we’ll get the global manufacturing PMIs for August and the ISM manufacturing reading from the US. From central banks, we’ll hear from the Fed’s Bostic and Mester.

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 futures up 0.2% to 4,526.00
  • MXAP up 0.4% to 162.78
  • MXAPJ up 0.3% to 508.53
  • Nikkei up 0.3% to 32,710.62
  • Topix up 0.8% to 2,349.75
  • Hang Seng Index down 0.5% to 18,382.06
  • Shanghai Composite up 0.4% to 3,133.25
  • Sensex up 0.8% to 65,348.50
  • Australia S&P/ASX 200 down 0.4% to 7,278.30
  • Kospi up 0.3% to 2,563.71
  • STOXX Europe 600 up 0.2% to 459.33
  • German 10Y yield little changed at 2.49%
  • Euro little changed at $1.0852
  • Brent Futures up 0.3% to $87.13/bbl
  • Gold spot up 0.1% to $1,942.47
  • US Dollar Index little changed at 103.57

Top Overnight News from Bloomberg

  • Markets settled into a holding pattern ahead of Friday’s key US jobs data, with European stocks and American equity-index futures edging higher, Treasury yields flat and a gauge of the dollar steady.
  • China intensified efforts to stimulate the economy and support its currency, as investor concerns over the growth outlook persist. The central bank will trim the amount of foreign currency deposits banks are required to hold as reserves for the first time this year, the People’s Bank of China said Friday.
  • Dollar General Corp., already on track for its first annual share decline, fell again after cutting its profit forecast for the second straight quarter amid rising labor costs and “softer sales trends.”
  • US and other Group of Seven nations increasingly see evidence of deep-seated structural problems in China that ultimately will strengthen the West’s hand against a weakening geopolitical competitor. The view emerging from officials in Washington, Rome, Tokyo and other capitals, who spoke with Bloomberg News mostly on condition of anonymity in recent days, is that the dominant economic narrative that has guided the flows of capital around the globe for decades is flipping fast.

A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

APAC stocks traded mixed following a similar lead from Wall Street, whilst Hong Kong markets were closed due to Typhoon Saola. ASX 200 declined further under 7,300 and was weighted by its metals names as Fortescue Metals slumped after its CFO left three days after the CEO’s departure. Nikkei 225 opened in the red but quickly trimmed losses with the rebound spearheaded by the energy sector. KOSPI was underpinned by the South Korean trade data which printed better than feared. Shanghai Comp opened firmer after large Chinese banks cut their deposit rates, while the PBoC also lowered down payment for first and second-time home buyers and announced a cut to the FX RRR. Modest upticks were seen after the Caixin PMI Finals were surprisingly revised into expansion territory.

Top Asian News

  • PBoC is to cut FX RRR by 2ppts to 4% (prev. 6%) from September 15th, according to the central bank. China’s Global Times, on the PBoC FX RRR cut, said “This move aims to enhance the ability of financial institutions to utilize foreign exchange capital.”
  • Several major Chinese banks lowered their deposit rates, including ICBC, China Construction Bank, Bank of Communications, and Bank of China.
  • China’s Shenzhen City will suspend work, businesses, transportation, and markets from Friday afternoon amid Typhoon Saola, according to the Shenzhen Government.
  • PBoC sold CNY 101bln via 7-day reverse repos with the rate at 1.80% for a CNY 120bln net injection.
  • China to take additional action to revive the property sector, via Reuters citing sources; incl. relaxing home purchase curbs and removing caps on new homes.
  • Softbank’s (9984 JT) Arm Holdings is expected to set a price range for its IPO next week, with plans to price its shares on September 13th and trading to start the following day, according to Reuters sources.
  • Japanese Finance Minister Suzuki said FX moves should be set by the market and should reflect fundamentals; sudden FX moves are undesirable, according to Reuters.

European bourses are in the green, Euro Stoxx 50 +0.3%, as modest upside creeps in following a tentative/slightly subdued open with fundamentals light ahead of key US data. Sectors are primarily positive, Energy the clear outperformer after an MS upgrade and broader benchmark action while Autos lag following a negative Volkswagen broker move and as Tesla cuts prices in China for some models. Stateside, futures are in-fitting with Europe and are slightly firmer, ES +0.2%. with the tone equally as tentative before NFP & ISM Manufacturing.

Top European News

  • ECB’s de Guindos said the latest data from July and August point towards economic deceleration in Q3 and probably in Q4, and the ECB needs to keep working to bring inflation back to the 2% target. He said the latest data from inflation in August has been very similar to July, and the rate decision in September is still up for debate. He said data in the next few days is key to the September ECB decision, according to Reuters.
  • ECB’s Villeroy says after overall inflation peaked and underlying inflation has also peaked since April and appears to have begun its decline. This encouraging sign is still far from sufficient. Options are open at the next and upcoming meetings. Very close to a peak in rates, far from the point where we could consider cuts. Keeping rates high for long enough matters more than the level. Will slightly revise up France’s 2023 GDP forecast.
  • ECB’s Vujcic says inflation data in August was in-line with expectations, economic activity is slowing faster than forecast. Will not know in September, October or November where the terminal is. Inflation will ease in the coming months but there is a risk that disinflation will stall above the target.
  • BoE’s Pill says BoE needs to be particularly wary about letting an inflation persistence dynamic to set in; we have not yet seen a downturn in core inflation which would reassure us.

FX

  • Buck bounces from overnight lows, but is contained overall ahead of US payrolls, DXY sits within 103.480-770 range.
  • Franc a tad firmer in line with Swiss YY CPI vs consensus, USD/CHF towards base of 0.8813-46 parameters.
  • Euro, Pound, Yen and Loonie all rangy pre-NFP and Canadian GDP, EUR/USD around 1.0850 and surrounded by hefty expiries, Cable hovering below 1.2700, USD/JPY pivoting 145.00 and USD/CAD straddling 1.3500.
  • Yuan underpinned by multiple factors including 200 bp RRR cut and surprise upgrade to Caixin Chinese manufacturing PMI to growth from contraction, USD/CNY close to 7.2450 and USD/CNH sub-7.2400 at one stage.
  • PBoC set USD/CNY mid-point at 7.1788 vs exp. 7.2967 (prev. 7.1811)

Fixed Income

  • Debt succumbs to some consolidation as the turn of the month comes with key US macro releases via NFP and the manufacturing ISM.
  • Bunds, Gilts and T-note all in negative territory after Thursday’s rallies and within 133.13-132.76, 95.49-14 and 110-31+/27 respective ranges.

Commodities

  • Crude benchmarks are in the green but only modestly so and taking impetus from the USD rather than any specific crude driver with the overall tone tentative pre-NFP.
  • Dutch TTF has pared back to near the unchanged mark after initial gains as Chevron workers rejected the first mediation package ahead of potential strikes on September 7th.
  • Spot gold is at the top-end of parameters but as above this is relatively modest with specifics light while base metals have returned firmly to the green as China unveils further stimulus.
  • Crude futures were on a slightly firmer footing and extended on the prior session’s gains, with Brent testing 87/bbl to the upside as it takes aim at the August high of USD 87.37/bbl.
  • Spot gold saw an uptick as the DXY pulled back but price action remains within yesterday’s range and under USD 1,950/oz ahead of NFPs.
  • Copper futures were lifted on the aforementioned China announcement, with 3M LME copper briefly topping USD 8,500/t to the upside.
  • Chevron’s (CVX) Australia LNG workers reject the Co’s bargaining offer, according to unions; less than 1% of the Wheatstone and Gorgon downstream workforce voted in support of the offer, according to Reuters. Subsequently, sources report that CVX and unions will meet for talks next week.
  • Russia introduced a 7% export duty on a number of fertilisers from September 1st, according to Interfax.

Geopolitics

  • Japan imposed additional sanctions against North Korea, according to Reuters.

US Event Calendar

  • 08:30: Aug. Change in Nonfarm Payrolls, est. 170,000, prior 187,000
    • Change in Private Payrolls, est. 148,000, prior 172,000
    • Change in Manufact. Payrolls, est. zero, prior -2,000
  • 08:30: Aug. Average Hourly Earnings MoM, est. 0.3%, prior 0.4%
    • Average Hourly Earnings YoY, est. 4.3%, prior 4.4%
    • Average Weekly Hours All Emplo, est. 34.3, prior 34.3
  • 08:30: Aug. Unemployment Rate, est. 3.5%, prior 3.5%
    • Underemployment Rate, prior 6.7%
    • Labor Force Participation Rate, est. 62.6%, prior 62.6%
  • 09:45: Aug. S&P Global US Manufacturing PM, est. 47.0, prior 47.0
  • 10:00: July Construction Spending MoM, est. 0.5%, prior 0.5%
  • 10:00: Aug. ISM Manufacturing, est. 47.0, prior 46.4

Central Bank Speakers

 

  • 06:00: FEd’s Bostic Speaks on US Monetary Policy
  • 09:45: Fed’s Mester Speaks on Inflation

DB’s Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

Welcome to September and to an early month payrolls Friday. Spare a thought for me this weekend as I’ll be refereeing 40 plus over excited 6 year olds playing Laser Quest as our twins have their birthday party on Sunday. My advice to all the graduates just joining the industry and reading this is to have your kids young while you have lots of energy. Then when you get to my age you can have easy paced relaxing weekends rather than the ones I have. I’m going to be especially exhausted by Monday.

Since it’s the start of the month, we’ll shortly be releasing our monthly performance review for August, which has been a pretty challenging one for financial markets albeit one where markets had a much better last week or so. In the month we had a further softening in the economic data, particularly in Europe and China, which has led to growing concern about the near-term outlook. At the same time, there’s been rising speculation that interest rates are set to remain higher for longer, and earlier in the month we even saw the 10yr Treasury yield hit a post-GFC high after both a US government debt downgrade and a much higher Treasury issuance profile announced than expected. So a lot going on in a holiday heavy month. See the full report in your inboxes shortly.

August might not have been a great month overall, but since Jackson Hole last week, we’ve actually had a decent market rally though one that lost a little momentum in the last 24 hours. Yesterday saw the S&P 500 (-0.16%) end a four-day winning streak after a sell off late in the US session, whilst the 10yr Treasury yield (-0.7bps) retreated for a 5th day running. Fresh China stimulus overnight (more below) has restored a little momentum as we start September.

For much of the final day of the month yesterday, markets were supported by the data alongside several central bank speakers who sounded cautious about further rate hikes. For instance in the US, the weekly initial jobless claims fell back to 228k over the week ending August 26 (vs. 235k expected), which is their third consecutive decline. Furthermore, the PCE inflation numbers for July were also in decent shape, and that’s the number the Fed officially targets. The important takeaway was that the year-on-year number for core PCE only rose a tenth to 4.2%, which is beneath the 4.3% estimate that Chair Powell cited in his speech last week. So things are running a bit better than the Fed was expecting even a week ago. Slightly concerningly, the supercore services measure often referred to by the Fed was up a strong +0.45% on the month. But more encouragingly, our US economists noted that the 1-month annualised rate of trimmed mean PCE was only +2.4%, its lowest since spring 2021. So take your pick.

In conjunction with the inflation data, we had several remarks from central bank officials that added to hopes they might be done with their rate hikes. That included Atlanta Fed President Bostic, who said that “I feel policy is appropriately restrictive”, and that “we should be cautious and patient and let the restrictive policy continue to influence the economy, lest we risk tightening too much and inflicting unnecessary economic pain.” Meanwhile at the ECB, Isabel Schnabel of the Executive Board said that recent developments “point to growth prospects being weaker than foreseen in the baseline scenario” in the June projections. She also said that whilst further rate hikes could be warranted, there was also an acknowledgement that “should our assessment of the transmission of monetary policy suggest that the pace of disinflation is proceeding as desired, we may afford to wait until our next meeting”. We also got the accounts of the ECB’s July meeting, which showed a moderation of the ECB’s hawkish bias. See our European economists’ reaction note here.

When it comes to the ECB’s decision in a couple of weeks, yesterday brought another piece of the jigsaw with the flash CPI print for August. That showed headline inflation remaining at +5.3%, whilst core inflation fell back two-tenths to +5.3%. While the core print was in line with consensus, our economists note that the underlying momentum was more encouraging, with services inflation easing slightly despite upside in volatile package holidays. The global trend, the inflation data, and the Schnabel remarks helped dial back the chances of a rate hike in September, with market pricing moving from a 55% chance at the previous close, down to 40% immediately prior to the CPI print (after Schnabel’s comments) and to 24% by the close. That’s the lowest chance the market has given a September hike since May, so as it stands we’re getting to the point where it would actively be a surprise if the ECB didn’t pause. In turn, those expectations of a pause led to a significant rally among European sovereign bonds, with yields on 10yr bunds (-8.1bps), OATs (-8.3bps) and BTPs (-7.7bps) seeing big declines.

Looking forward, we’ve got a couple of important releases today that might give us extra clues on the hard vs soft landing debate. The most important will be the US jobs report for August, which is out at 13:30 London time. Our US economists expect nonfarm payrolls growth to slow to +150k (consensus at +170k). That would be the slowest print since December 2020, and they see that causing the unemployment rate to move up a tenth to 3.6%. The other release of note will be the ISM manufacturing, which has now been in contractionary territory for 9 months in a row.

With another round of data to look forward to, US equities were in something of a holding pattern. Having started the day up by nearly +0.4% in the morning, the S&P 500 ended up closing -0.16% down after a late sell-off. Healthcare services (-2.65%) and banks (-0.73%) were among the underperformers. Meanwhile, tech stocks outperformed, with the NASDAQ (+0.11%) hitting a 4-week high as it eked out a fifth consecutive gain. Over in Europe, equities saw a subdued performance, with the STOXX 600 down -0.20%.

Asian equity markets are trading higher this morning as China ramped up its efforts to support the economy after the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) reduced the amount of foreign exchange that financial institutions must hold as reserves for the first time this year. Starting from September 15, the central bank will lower the forex reserve ratio to 4% from the current level of 6%, a move aimed at reining in yuan weakness. The offshore yuan did spike +0.5% on the news but has settled only +0.1% higher as we type. Additionally, China’s Caixin manufacturing PMI rose to 51.0 in August, the highest reading since February compared to a level of 49.2 in July.

In terms of equity market moves, the Nikkei (+0.53%) is leading gains overnight, while the CSI (+0.51%), the Shanghai Composite (+0.25%), and the KOSPI (+0.17%) are also trading in positive territory. Elsewhere, trading in Hong Kong has been suspended for today as the city is bracing itself for super Typhoon Saola. S&P 500 (+0.10%) and NASDAQ 100 (+0.07%) futures are trading slightly higher.

Looking back at yesterday’s other data, there was a decent +0.8% jump in US personal spending in July (vs. +0.7% expected) supporting the evidence of strong start to the quarter. However, the savings rate fell back to an 8-month low of 3.5% and incomes were a tenth below expectations at +0.2%. Otherwise, the MNI Chicago PMI for August rose to a one-year high of 48.7 (vs. 44.2 expected) and 42.8 last month. Earlier in the day, German retail sales for July disappointed (-0.8% vs +0.3% expected) in a latest sign of growth struggles for Europe’s largest economy.

To the day ahead now, and the main highlight will be the US jobs report for August. Otherwise, we’ll get the global manufacturing PMIs for August and the ISM manufacturing reading from the US. From central banks, we’ll hear from the Fed’s Bostic and Mester.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/01/2023 – 08:09

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/ed4TEhF Tyler Durden

“Mugshot Merch” Selling Like Hotcakes On Trump’s Website

“Mugshot Merch” Selling Like Hotcakes On Trump’s Website

Merchandise featuring former President Donald Trump’s mugshot has been selling like hotcakes on his website, according to Stevevn Cheung, a spokesperson for Trump’s 2024 campaign.

According to a Tuesday tweet, “Mugshot merch sales have spiked” as part of an overall $9.4 million raised since it was taken – which consists of $1.7 million T-shirts, $864,000 in coffee mugs, and $352,000 in posters.

Trump was indicted in Fulton County, Georgia – one of four current cases against the former president. The mugshot was taken as part of a case with 18 co-defendants, who were indicted in connection with efforts to overturn the state’s 2020 election result.

The former president said that being booked was a “terrible experience,” and “not a comfortable feeling.”

More via the Epoch Times,

Liz Harrington, spokesperson for President Trump, said the recent surge in donations, particularly after the mugshot was released, is the result of the American people deciding to stand with the former president, during a recent interview with EpochTV’s “Crossroads” program.

The American people see right through it. They know that there’s nothing here, there’s no crimes, even that have been alleged,” Ms. Harrington said. “And so when they see this relentless persecution for the past eight years now, that has just escalated as he’s gotten stronger, and we’re the American people behind him, the American people see that and they rally behind him.”

“When that image came out, I think it just really had such a strong resonance with the American people because they know President Trump, they know that he fights for the American people,” she added.

“They saw that picture and they said, ‘We’re going to fight back and we’re going to stand with him.’ And they saw someone with resolve and with strength and defiance against a very corrupt system.”

On Aug. 25, the day after the former president was booked in Atlanta, he raised $4.18 million, making it the “highest grossing day” of his campaign to date, according to Mr. Cheung.

The single-day fundraising record is evident that American people are smart, Ms. Harrington added.

“They have a fundamental sense of right and wrong and fairness and justice. And they know that none of that is being applied here,” she said.

One of those who have purchased President Trump’s mugshot merchandise is former Republican congressional candidate Laura Loomer, who took to X on Aug. 24 to say that she had purchased multiple T-shirts, coffee mugs, and bumper stickers.

Happy to send Donald Trump $452 tonight to send a message to those who are attacking him,” Ms. Loomer wrote.

Richard Kligman, owner of two Trump Superstores located in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, told The Epoch Times last week that “people are going nuts” for the mugshot merchandise.

‘Two-Tiered Justice System’

Many lawmakers have since shared President Trump’s mugshot on X and commented on the indictments against the former president.

“Last night, Donald Trump’s mugshot was released. It should’ve been his 4th mugshot for his 4th indictment,” Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.) wrote on Aug. 25.

“In the United States, no one is above the law. No one,” Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) wrote on Aug. 24. “Trump’s crimes + lies are corrosive to America’s future + our standing in the world.”

Rep. Alex Mooney (R-W. Va.) wrote on Aug. 24 that he stands with the former president.

“The two-tiered justice system is at it again. The never-ending witch hunts roll on!” Mr. Mooney added.

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) wrote that the mugshot “is the official photo that won Trump the [White House] back” on Aug. 24.

A recent Ipsos survey found that 71 percent of Americans didn’t think President Trump would be able to get an impartial jury in his online legal battle. The survey polled people who have served on juries in the past 10 years.

In fact, more potential Republican primary voters see the former president having the best chance to beat President Joe Biden in 2024, following the first GOP presidential debate and the release of his mug shot, according to a poll by Morning Consult. The poll surveyed almost 800 potential Republican primary voters from Aug. 24 to Aug. 27.

Sixty-two percent of respondents said President Trump had the best chance to win, up from 53 percent the week earlier.

“That is up 9 percentage points over the previous week, and matches a high in Morning Consult’s tracking of the question since April,” the poll says.

“Despite his escalating legal troubles, which he’s embraced with his campaign’s monetization of his mug shot, our daily tracking shows that Trump continues to poll neck-and-neck against Biden while Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis trails the incumbent,” it says.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/01/2023 – 07:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/S5me8i0 Tyler Durden

How Can the State Prevent Viewpoint Foreclosure?

(This is the final post in a five-part series on regulating online content moderation.)

In Part III, I showed how it is possible for private actors to remove an unpopular viewpoint from the internet by preventing websites that express that viewpoint from operating, a phenomenon I call “viewpoint foreclosure.” In Part IV, I explained why every lawful website should have the right to exist—that is, to stay online. In Part II, I argued that regulating core intermediaries—the entities that administer the internet’s core resources and, thus, the entities capable of effecting viewpoint foreclosure—would not run afoul of any First Amendment right to editorial discretion.

In this Part, I explain how the state can prevent viewpoint foreclosure by guaranteeing certain basic internet rights. To identify these rights—the bare minimum case for the state to intervene in private content moderation—we simply need to determine what a person requires of others to stand up a public website.

Connectivity. In the first place, for a person to operate a public website, she needs to connect to the internet. For residential subscribers—those who use their internet connection merely to consume websites and other applications—a standard internet access service will suffice. But for those who wish to host their own websites, a residential subscription will not do. They require commercial internet service with the requisite stability and bandwidth to make a self-hosted website available to the world. Although it might seem that net neutrality rules guarantee a right of connectivity, that is not so. The FCC’s 2015 Open Internet Order (before it was repealed) pertained only to mass market broadband internet access, not to the kinds of commercial internet service public websites need to stay online. Moreover, the Open Internet Rules were concerned with website blocking when a subscriber is already able to enjoy internet access but his ISP prevents him from accessing certain websites or services that compete with the ISP. They did not concern themselves with ISPs who might refuse internet access altogether. To ensure enjoyment of that resource, we need a right of connectivity.

Addressability. Internet access is important, certainly, but unless you have use of a static IP address, your website will not be long for this world. IP addresses uniquely identify resources, including websites, on the public internet. Without a static IP address, any site reachable today may not be reachable tomorrow.

Just five regional internet registries (RIRs)—each a private organization—administer the IP address space, and each RIR can revoke any in-use block of addresses if the holder violates its terms. Thus far, RIRs have largely steered clear of the culture wars that rage within the application layer of the internet. But the decision by LACNIC, one of those RIRs, to revoke IP addresses that Parler relied on to escape deep deplatforming is concerning. LACNIC claimed to be enforcing a neutral (non-content-based) policy that Parler’s new hosting provider had allegedly violated. But as I explain in my article, The Five Internet Rights, there are reasons to question whether LACNIC was enforcing its policies equally (or accurately). That fact, coupled with the broader ideological drive to deplatform Parler, raises the possibility that we may have seen the first instance of IP-based deplatforming.

Even if that suspicion is misplaced, it doesn’t change the fact that five entities alone control the world’s IP addresses, each of which is as free under current law to revoke IP addresses under its policies as Facebook is free to delete user posts that violate its standards. Given the centrality of IP addresses to online speech, a complete view of expressive access to the internet must include a right to maintain one or more static IP addresses for public websites. It must include a right of addressability.

Nameability. Nameability refers to the right of a website operator to maintain a domain name and, when users query that domain name, to have those queries answered (resolved) by returning the IP address at which the website is hosted.

As with the IP address system, the domain name system (DNS) has historically operated in a content-neutral manner. But that neutrality is waning. Domain registrars have increasingly waded into the content moderation game by inserting “morality clauses” into their registration agreements. For example, various registrars have prohibited registrants from associating domain names with websites that host “profane,” “vulgar[],” “embarrass[ing], “derogatory, “racist, “homophobic,” “blasphemous,” or other “morally objectionable” content.  Thus, dailystormer.com, gab.com, ar15.com, and other websites have seen their domain names suspended because their registrars disliked their viewpoints. Guaranteeing expressive access to the internet should therefore include a right of nameability that prevents DNS intermediaries from taking adverse action against domain names associated with lawful websites merely because they disagree with the viewpoints expressed on those websites.

Routability. Routability refers to the right of a website operator to have traffic to and from her website faithfully routed between intervening networks.

The term internet—short for “inter-network”—concisely captures the fact that the internet operates as a network of networks (in technical parlance, “autonomous systems”). Internet communication, therefore, is fundamentally a matter of “hopping” across networks, where each intervening network represents an additional hop between source and destination. Each network learns where to route internet traffic by receiving information from border routers in neighboring networks that “announce” which IP addresses they own and which other networks they can reach.

This ability to dynamically route traffic via different combinations of independently operated networks was one of the great innovations of the internet. But it also provides opportunities for viewpoint foreclosure. Network operators or others can attempt to take down unpopular websites by falsely announcing their IP addresses, a technique known as “BGP hijacking.” Or, less dramatically, network operators could simply refuse to route traffic to or from an unpopular website by declining to announce the website’s addresses or network number to neighboring networks. For example, after Cloud Innovation, an English colo provider, made itself a pariah in the African community by suing AfriNIC, certain African ISPs publicly discussed ceasing to route packets to IP addresses belonging to the company as a form of ideological retribution. Any regulatory scheme premised on preventing viewpoint foreclosure should therefore take account of a right to routability.

Accessibility. Finally, accessibility refers to the right of a website operator not to have users blocked from accessing her website.

Some ISPs already block access to illegal or infringing websites. Although the federal Stop Online Privacy Act (SOPA) and PROTECT IP Act (PIPA) bills, which would have required ISPs to block certain infringing sites, met an ignominious end after a well-publicized online revolt, copyright holders are nonetheless securing similar injunctions from courts.

But ISPs have just as much power to block lawful websites as they do unlawful websites. Such actions would no doubt violate net neutrality rules were they still in effect. Each of the FCC’s three attempts at net neutrality included some form of a no-blocking rule that prevented ISPs from blocking subscribers’ access to lawful applications and websites. And California’s Internet Consumer Protection and Net Neutrality Act, which the state enacted in 2018 after the demise of federal net neutrality rules, currently prohibits such behavior. But net neutrality has historically targeted economic discrimination, not moral or ideological discrimination. It aimed to prevent ISPs from leveraging their power over their own networks to block subscribers from accessing websites either because the ISP offered a competing product or because the ISP wished to extract a toll from website operators to reach its subscribers.

Of course, taken literally, net neutrality rules would prevent ISPs from blocking any lawful website, regardless of the reason (economic or moral). But it remains to be seen whether net neutrality advocates, who tend to populate the political left, will continue to support such broad rules if those on the political right begin attempting to use them to protect far-right websites from left-led deplatforming campaigns.

[* * *]

In sum, if it is indeed possible to boot unpopular users, groups, or viewpoints from the internet altogether; if lawful (even offensive) websites should have a basic right to stay online; and if the First Amendment permits the state to intervene in attempts at “content moderation” by the entities that administer the internet’s core resources—all of which I believe to be the case—then, fortunately, there is a workable solution. The architecture of the internet reveals five distinct choke points that could be used by private parties to excise disfavored speech from the internet. The state could protect lawful speech from that excision by enshrining five basic internet rights—the rights of connectivity, addressability, nameability, routability, and accessibility—a non-discrimination regime that would be clear and administrable. It could also be bipartisan, as it marries the economic discrimination concerns of the left that animate net neutrality with the ideological discrimination concerns of the right that animate social media non-discrimination laws like those in Texas and Florida. And because it focuses only on the core infrastructure of the internet—and the core issue of whether users should enjoy a basic right to speak on their own websites—its modesty is perhaps its most attractive feature.

Does that mean the state should never intervene in content moderation in higher layers of the internet stack, such as cloud computing or social media? I don’t know. I remain unconvinced that either side of that debate has a slam dunk take on the issue. But if we start with the simple premise that all users should be able to speak not on individual websites but on the internet, then I think that that premise of basic viewpoint access could provide a platform from which to tackle those and many other thorny questions of content moderation.

The post How Can the State Prevent Viewpoint Foreclosure? appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/9YaCAnS
via IFTTT

California Coastal Cities’ Housing Plan: Build Elsewhere


sandra-seitamaa-YoyH-Oeq1H0-unsplash | Photo by Sandra Seitamaa on Unsplash

One of the more entertaining aspects of the state’s battle to open up housing development to reduce California’s housing shortage is the degree to which it has united officials in liberal coastal cities with those in conservative ones. Although Left and Right typically use different rhetoric to evade new housing bills, they are strangely aligned in their ultimate quest to block permissive new construction laws.

Republican-controlled Huntington Beach, which has sued the state government to stop enforcement of state housing mandates (and was sued first by the state for its failure to process “by right” duplex approvals under Senate Bill 9), has championed the “local control” argument and stoked NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) fears about turning this suburban city into an urban hell-scape.

In a column, GOP Mayor Tony Strickland vowed the city will never be “rubber stamps for Gavin Newsom’s vision of turning every community in California into his failed experiment of San Francisco, America’s worst city, whose decline began on Newsom’s watch as mayor there.” Strickland lives in an “affordable-housing” unit and presumably his neighborhood has yet to turn into the Tenderloin.

In lefty near-coastal Beverly Hills, Councilman John Mirisch is raising a different specter—that pro-housing advocates are following the model of Texas, which has usurped local control on social issues including gun regulation. Mirisch also complains about corporate profits, the “urban growth machine” and the evils of “deregulation,” but arrives at the same place as Strickland in opposing freer housing markets. Strange bedfellows.

Now, other coastal NIMBYs—who claim to stand up for principle, but seem allergic to newcomers moving into their cities—have something new to get agitated about. Senate Bill 423 is still alive in the California Legislature. It would extend the provisions of a landmark 2017 law, Senate Bill 35, which authorized a “streamlined, ministerial approval process” for multi-family projects in cities that aren’t meeting their state housing mandates.

That law sunsets in 2026, but S.B. 423 would extend it for another decade. What’s really got the no-growth cities upset is one short line in the bill language: “Strikes out S.B. 35’s exclusion of the coastal zone.” Existing law requires projects to still gain approval from the slow-growth California Coastal Commission. That would end and developers would no longer have to endure that excruciating process. Amendments that exempt additional coastal properties have resulted in the commission removing its opposition to the bill.

Why is this important? S.B. 35 had a measurable impact on the construction of affordable housing projects. “Between 2018 and 2021, developers proposed about 18,000 housing units statewide under S.B. 35—including about 13,000 low-income units, according to preliminary data from UC Berkeley’s Terner Center for Housing Innovation. Of those, more than 11,000 qualified for streamlining under the law,” The Mercury News reported.

Another significant provision of S.B. 423: it expands the streamlining to market-rate projects. That might not create many additional units given that, as Reason‘s Christian Britschgi has noted, pro-union prevailing-wage laws make it costly to build these projects without subsidies. Still, it’s important to expand deregulation beyond subsidized projects. If the government stops stifling construction and imposing overly burdensome and arbitrary regulations, the market will rise to the occasion, boost supply, and open up housing at all price points.

Developers should be free to build more of everything—from single-family houses to apartments—without subjective approval (while following zoning rules, as the bill requires). Few current residents want more congestion, and yet-to-be new residents don’t get a say, so the local default position often is “no”. Councils often force developers to reduce the number of units when they do OK a project. And California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) lawsuits derail or delay projects.

The bill’s opponents continue to throw contradictory arguments at the wall. In their letter of opposition to S.B. 423, some coastal city officials in San Diego County argued: “The fabric of our coastal communities will be forever changed. And for what? SB 423 will encourage higher density and perpetuate gentrification with little to no affordability.”

The letter adds that rents for one-bedroom apartments in North San Diego County start at $5,750 a month and new multi-family homes are selling for nearly $3 million. It’s true many newer units are pricey, but adding supply—including the construction of the rent-restricted units this bill encourages—is the best way to moderate pricing. More supply is the solution. Protecting a community’s “fabric” is pabulum—and it locks in the current situation.

Environmental groups are complaining, also. They pay lip service to the need for more housing construction—but like the coastal cities apparently want it built anywhere else. That’s the bottom line. The state has been underbuilding housing for years, which has led to eye-popping prices, especially in sought-after coastal cities. The answer is to build more. Sorry, but building it in someone else’s backyard is no longer an option.

This column was first published in The Orange County Register.

The post California Coastal Cities' Housing Plan: Build Elsewhere appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/YZ8y2mX
via IFTTT

Review: Mr. Jimmy


Akio Sakurai in "Mr. Jimmy" | Abramorama

Mr. Jimmy is a movie about star worship edging over into madness. Not that the Mr. Jimmy of the title—a Japanese guitarist and onetime kimono salesman named Akio Sakurai—sees it that way. Ever since he first heard Led Zeppelin as a teenager, and then laid eyes on the band in The Song Remains the Same, the group’s 1976 concert documentary, Sakurai has had one mission in life: to demonstrate his adoration of Zeppelin founder Jimmy Page. He is completely candid about this: “I want to be Jimmy Page,” he remembers thinking.

He is of course doomed to failure in this aspiration, having none of Page’s creative gifts or formidable cool. Sakurai—let’s call him Jimmy, everyone else does—is aware of his inadequacies. But he believes he’s found a way to surmount them—through obsessive imitation. He has heard and studied every Zeppelin bootleg. (We see a CD of one called Listen To This Eddie, which was recorded at a 1977 Zeppelin gig by a guy with a microphone installed in his wheelchair.) Jimmy studies these shows obsessively, so that when he takes the stage with his band (called Mr. Jimmy, of course) at one of the little Tokyo rock clubs in which he’s performed for the last 30 years, they are able to replicate every musical detail of every vintage performance. One night they might focus on a specific 1973 date at New York’s Madison Square Garden; on another, they might revisit a particular show on the European tour that preceded that concert.

What is the point of this mimicry? “It’s very Japanese,” says a technician at the shop that provides Jimmy with period-perfect versions of old-school capacitors and pickups for his vintage equipment. “Jimmy plays to recreate. We manufacture to recreate.”

Same with the guitars. Jimmy has a prime Harmony acoustic of the kind that Page is known to have used. (“He wrote some of his greatest songs with this guitar.”)  He even owns a latter-day model of Page’s famous double-neck Gibson. “I can only use guitars he played,” Jimmy says. “If it was a different guitar, I wouldn’t understand the song, and the guitar wouldn’t show me the way.”

He is equally devoted to the particulars of Page’s Zeppelin-era stage outfits—the iconic silk-and-velvet “Dragon Suit,” for instance, the one with the rampant golden lizard making its way down one leg. Page started wearing the trousers of this outfit around March 1975, Sakurai says; the jacket completed the ensemble in April: “He wore it at all five shows at Earl’s Court.”

So what does all of this emulation add up to? We see Mr. Jimmy onstage, and the band is slick and tight, with Sakurai offering a flashy simulacrum of the Page guitar sound. But we’ve heard it all before, every bent note and squalling distortion, so the music is empty of excitement. The show is a carefully crafted fake. But maybe that’s enough. Sumito Okamoto, the band’s manager, a onetime employee of Tokyo Disneyland, has some thoughts on this. “At Disneyland,” he says, “everything is fake. But people enter that fake world and have fun.”

Things get real one night in 2012, when Mr. Jimmy is playing yet another packed Tokyo club. Suddenly, out of nowhere, an unexpected visitor walks in the door—it’s Jimmy Page himself, in town for some promotional purpose. Page has apparently heard about Mr. Jimmy. We see him sitting down at a table, taking in the show, and at the end rising to join the crowd in a standing ovation. “I could see his eyes,” Sakurai says, virtually melting with happiness. “It was an almost dreamlike evening.”

Inspired, and encouraged by his wife, Junko, Jimmy decides to finally quit the small-time Tokyo bar scene and relocate to Los Angeles, where Led Zeppelin once played the much-storied Whisky A Go Go. Peter Michael Dowd, the movie’s director and editor, made a smart choice in following Sakurai’s story beyond the meeting with Page, which might have concluded any other film. Instead, Dowd tracks him to America, where he encounters other Zeppelin obsessives (although none quite as obsessed as he is). Most of these people are in “tribute” bands with names like Led Zepagain, something in which Jimmy has zero interest. Dowd sticks with him on his search for the secrets of Jimmy Page, and soon we see that this could be a road with no end.

“I can never do the same as him,” Sakurai says of his idol. “Every time I study a song, I feel like he gets farther out of reach.”

The post Review: <em>Mr. Jimmy</em> appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/fZa1OnG
via IFTTT

Russia Agrees On Further Oil Export Cuts, Will Reveal Deal Parameters Next Week

Russia Agrees On Further Oil Export Cuts, Will Reveal Deal Parameters Next Week

By Julianne Geiger of Oilprice.com

Russia will disclose the details of the deal with OPEC+ next week, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak told President Vladimir Putin on Thursday, according to Reuters.

Novak did not specify exactly which details would be disclosed.

Putin asked Novak at a televised government meeting if he had reached an agreement with OPEC+ to reduce oil supply. It was not immediately clear whether the deal involves production cuts, export cuts, or both.

“We have agreed, but we will announce the main parameters next week, publicly,” Novak replied.

The current deal Russia has with OPEC+ would see the country’s oil exports cut by 500,000 bpd. On top of this, Moscow has also promised to reduce its oil exports in August by another 500,000 bpd and to cut September shipments by 300,000 bpd.

The oil output cuts in Russia have been holding back its top producer Rosneft from fully realizing its potential, the chief executive of the state-controlled oil giant, Igor Sechin, said just one day earlier, on Wednesday.

“I should note that Rosneft has been limiting crude oil production in one way or another since 2017, which prevents the Company from fully unleashing its potential,” Sechin said in a statement discussing Rosneft’s first-half performance. Sechin has voiced repeated arguments against the production cut deal with OPEC+. In June this year, Sechin said that Russia is exporting a smaller share of its oil output, losing market share compared to other OPEC+ members. Some OPEC+ members are exporting up to 90% of their oil output while for Russia, the share is around 50% of the total, according to Rosneft’s top executive.

Bloomberg has, however, named Russia the victor in the oil production cuts, reducing production even more starting in July, while Saudi Arabia, for example, started making extra cuts in May.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/01/2023 – 07:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/5lMIkuD Tyler Durden

EU’s Top Copper Produce Warns Of Massive Theft, Shares Plunge 

EU’s Top Copper Produce Warns Of Massive Theft, Shares Plunge 

Shares of Europe’s top copper producer in Frankfurt trading plummeted following an announcement that it might have fallen victim to a massive theft, potentially leading to losses of several hundred million euros –adding to the series of turbulence to rock the global metals sector in recent years. 

Bloomberg reported that Hamburg-based Aurubis ‘found discrepancies’ in its metal inventories. It said suppliers had manipulated details about the scrap metal shipments, with even its employees in the sampling department covering up the scam. 

“What we currently know is that some of our recycling suppliers appear to have manipulated details about the raw materials they deliver to us, and they have been working with employees in our sampling department to hide the shortfall from us,” Angela Seidler, vice president for investor relations and corporate communications, told Bloomberg by phone. 

Seidler continued, “Then, in the production process, we have found that the metal is missing, but it is something we have discovered over time because in the case of copper, for example, it takes four weeks for the material to be processed.”

Aurubis expects a detailed report will be completed by the end of September. It said preliminary figures show losses could be in “the low, three-digit-million-euro range.”   

The news of the metal theft forced the company to admit its previously forecast operating earnings before taxes of 450 to 550 million euros for this fiscal year is no longer attainable. 

“It’s a very serious incident, but the impact of it will be digested within our current fiscal year, and it will not have an impact on our expansion plans and our strategic priorities,” Seidler said.

Shares of Aurubis crashed as much as 17% in Frankfurt trading. Salzgitter, which has a 30% stake in Aurubis, sank 7.3% as it slashed guidance. 

Morgan Stanley analyst Ioannis Masvoulas told clients the revelation of the scam is a “negative surprise, which raises uncertainties around inventory management.”

More from Masvoulas’ note (breakdown courtesy of Bloomberg):

  • Shows a more extensive impact related to alleged criminal activities than previously anticipated 

  • While suggests an inventory writedown in the order of about 3% of market cap, the impact may be bigger on market sentiment toward the company

  • This setback follows a weaker operating performance that translates to a soft exit rate for FY23

There have been a series of scandals to rock the global metal market. The latest was “Giant Commodity Trader Faces Massive Losses After ‘Missing Nickel’ Fraud Uncovered.” 

Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/01/2023 – 06:55

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/a7moI89 Tyler Durden

“No Other Sector Can Even Compare”: US Tech Stocks Are Soaring, But French Luxury Blows Them Out Of The Water

“No Other Sector Can Even Compare”: US Tech Stocks Are Soaring, But French Luxury Blows Them Out Of The Water

By Dhaval Joshi, Chief Strategist at BCA Research

Summary

  • The stock market’s pre-eminent growth sector is not US tech, it is French luxuries. No other sector can compare with French luxuries’ massive and sustained pricing power.

  • The risk for French luxuries is not a China slowdown, the risk is that the structural increase in super-wealth comes to an end. Yet if anything, the coming disruption from generative AI will boost super-wealth.

  • Own an outright structural exposure to French luxuries. As well as being the pre-eminent growth sector, the very different economics of luxuries gives the sector excellent diversification qualities.

  • Structurally overweight French luxuries versus US tech. While French luxuries and US tech are trading on broadly similar valuations, the moat around French luxuries profitability is more impregnable than the moat around US tech profitability.

  • Structurally overweight France (CAC 40) versus the euro area (Eurostoxx 50). The French stock market’s 40 percent exposure to luxuries will continue to give it a big advantage over its euro area peers.

The recent surge in major economy inflation into the mid-single digits has been dubbed the biggest cost of living crisis in a generation, a crisis that is still far from solved. But for the super-wealthy, the cost of living ‘extremely well’ has been inflating in the mid-single digits for decades. Suffice to say, this sustained inflation in luxury prices has not been a crisis!

Every year for the past forty years, Forbes has calculated a ‘cost of living extremely well index’ based on the prices of must have goods and services in a typical billionaire’s spending basket. For example, the current basket includes a black wool and silk Gucci dress priced at $2800, a Hermès Maxi 2.55 black handbag priced at $10,000, and of course the obligatory 1oz. of Chanel no. 5, a snip at just $345. For decades, the price of this luxury basket has inflated at a consistently reliable 5 percent, far outpacing ordinary inflation (Chart 1).

Therein lies the investment case for the luxuries sector. No other industry or sector in the world can boast such a massive and sustained pricing power.

French Luxuries Trump US Technology

With all the buzz around AI, you could be forgiven for thinking that the stock market’s pre-eminent growth sector is US technology.  But you would be wrong. The stock market’s pre-eminent growth sector is French luxury goods.

On most time horizons over the past decades, French luxuries have trumped US technology on profit growth, price performance and total return performance. This includes during the first internet revolution (Web 1.0), during the social media revolution (Web 2.0), and even during the post-pandemic recovery (Charts 2-4).

The pre-eminence of the luxuries sector is because its economics differs from other goods and services in three important ways.

  • First, unlike other goods and services, luxuries have a price elasticity of demand that is greater than one. Meaning that, while for most goods and services, a higher price reduces demand, for luxuries it is the opposite. The higher the price of the luxury, the greater is its cachet, exclusivity, and ultimately demand. This explains luxuries’ massive and sustained pricing power.

  • Second, because of this massive and sustained pricing power, the luxury sector is much less reliant on sales volume growth. Yes, luxury brands want to penetrate new markets such as China, but the unrestricted sales growth of a luxury within a market would diminish its key quality – exclusivity. So, while Apple might want everybody to have an iPhone, Hermes certainly doesn’t want everyone to have a Maxi 2.55 black handbag!

  • Third, the luxury sector has a massive barrier to entry. This is because it takes decades – or even centuries – to build the trusted quality, cachet, and exclusivity required in a luxury brand. Thereby, the leading luxury brands have built a massive moat around their profitability, making it near-impregnable for competitors.

As I explained in BCA Research – Can Tech Supercharge Profits? Don’t Bet On It, the equivalent moat around US tech sector profitability during the social media (Web 2.0) revolution was the so-called ‘network effect’. Once you get networks, the value of a network to a user increases as the number of users increases, resulting in a ‘winner-takes- all’: Amazon for shopping, Google for searching, or Facebook for socialising.

In this way, and helped by lax regulation, a handful of US tech companies became the Web 2.0 oligopolies with large moats around their profitability. The question now is, do the creators of generative AI have a moat around their profitability, as impregnable as the moat around French luxuries.

For Luxuries, The Real Risk Is Not China

For luxury brands, the obvious cloud on the horizon is the slowdown in China, which has been their fastest growing market. Yet as I explained in BCA Research – China’s Engine Is Failing, And The World Economy Is Losing Altitude, China has  generated 41 percent of the world’s economic growth through the past ten years. Thereby, China’s stellar growth has made it the fastest growing market for almost all products, not just luxuries.

In fact, French luxuries’ overall sales exposure to Asia ex Japan is only slightly above the region’s 25 percent weight in global GDP – albeit Hermès is overexposed at 48 percent of sales, while LVMH is underexposed at 20 percent.

However, to reiterate, luxuries sales and profits growth does not rely on volume growth. A significant part comes from luxuries’ massive and sustained pricing power (Chart 5).

Crucially though, luxuries’ pricing power also depends on the super-wealthy’s ability to absorb it, which it has been doing very easily. The simple reason is that through the past forty years, super-wealth – as measured by Forbes 400 total net worth – has increased at 10 percent a year, far above luxuries inflation.

The real risk for the luxuries sector is not a China slowdown. The real risk is that the structural increase in super-wealth comes to an end. If anything though, the coming disruption from generative AI will boost super-wealth – by hollowing out middle income jobs while enhancing the positions of the superstars. The irony is that the best investment play on generative AI might be French luxuries.

Three Investment Conclusions

We reach three structural investment conclusions:

First, own an outright structural exposure to the French luxuries sector. As well as being the pre-eminent growth sector, the very different economics of luxuries gives the sector excellent diversification qualities.

Second, structurally overweight French luxuries versus US tech. While French luxuries and US tech are trading on broadly similar valuations (Chart 6 and Chart 7), the moat around French luxuries profitability is more impregnable than the moat around US tech profitability. Because, as previously discussed, there is no obvious network effect moat around generative AI.

Additionally, the recent underperformance of French luxuries versus US tech has reached a short-term collapsed complexity that signals a good entry point (Chart 8).

Third, structurally overweight France (CAC 40) versus the euro area (Eurostoxx 50). The CAC 40 has a near 40 percent weighting to luxuries (counting L’Oréal as a quasi-luxury company). The large exposure to French luxuries has given, and will continue to give, the French stock market a big advantage over its euro area peers.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/01/2023 – 06:30

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/jwQ5D4P Tyler Durden

Protecting Kids on Social Media Act Cloaks Attack on Privacy Behind Concern for Children


A father, mother, and little girl happily look at a tablet. | Evgenyatamanenko | Dreamstime.com

There’s seemingly no policy turd that lawmakers are unwilling to polish in the name of “the children.” That brings us to the Protecting Kids on Social Media Act, currently working its way through the U.S. Senate. This measure borrows bad proposals from another federal bill and combines them with legislative idiocy enacted at the state level. The resulting concoction could destroy internet privacy, subjecting all our online activity to government scrutiny in the name of shielding wee ones from harm.

A Bipartisan Combination of Bad Ideas

Sponsored by Sen. Brian Schatz (D–Hawaii) and co-sponsored by Sen. Tom Cotton (R–Ark.), Sen. Chr Murphy (D-Conn.), and Sen. Katie Boyd Britt (R-Ala.) among others, the Protecting Kids on Social Meda Act generates the sort of cross-aisle consensus that generally only accompanies terrible ideas. The bill “contains elements of the dangerous Kids Online Safety Act as well as several ideas pulled from state bills that have passed this year, such as Utah’s surveillance-heavy Social Media Regulations law,” write the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s (EFF) Jason Kelley and Sophia Cope.

The Kids Online Safety Act, which has 43 cosponsors in the Senate, “ham-handedly aims to shield children and teenagers from vaguely defined dangers lurking on the internet,” Jacob Sullum noted earlier this month. “The unintended but foreseeable results are apt to include invasions of privacy that compromise First Amendment rights and a chilling impact on constitutionally protected speech, both of which will harm adults as well as the ‘kids’ whom the bill is supposed to protect.”

Likewise, “under the new Utah laws, social media companies will have to check the ages of new and existing Utah account holders—which of course means collecting and storing identifying information about every Utah user,” Elizabeth Nolan Brown summarized in March. “That leaves people’s personal information vulnerable to hackers, government snoops, unscrupulous tech employees, and more.”

The Protecting Kids on Social Media Act doubles down on bureaucratic control and surveillance of internet activity. As the title of the legislation suggests, its authors find substituting restrictive laws for parental responsibility in the name of shielding children from danger a convenient excuse for imposing controls that people would be unlikely to tolerate under any other circumstance.

According to EFF:

The Protecting Kids on Social Media Act has five major components:

  • Mandate that social media companies verify the ages of all account holders, including adults
  • Ban on children under age 13 using social media at all
  • Mandate that social media companies obtain parent or guardian consent before minors over 12 years old and under 18 years old may use social media
  • Ban on the data of minors (anyone over 12 years old and under 18 years old) being used to inform a social media platform’s content recommendation algorithm
  • Creation of a digital ID pilot program, instituted by the Department of Commerce, for citizens and legal residents, to verify ages and parent/guardian-minor relationships

The End of Online Anonymity

It’s tempting to conclude that the digital ID pilot program is the real warhead in this particular legislative weapon, since lawmakers and pundits often fret over online anonymity. The bill provides a clear path towards linking internet activity to identities so that, for example, politicians could identify their critics.

“Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce (referred to in this section as the ‘Secretary’) shall establish a pilot program (referred to in this Act as the ‘Pilot Program’) for providing a secure digital identification credential to individuals who are citizens and lawful residents of the United States at no cost to the individual,” reads the text of the bill. The program will “allow individuals to verify their age, or their parent or guardian relationship with a minor user, by uploading copies of government-issued and other forms of identification” or through “electronic records of State departments of motor vehicles, the Internal Revenue Service, the Social Security Administration, State agencies responsible for vital records, or other governmental or professional records providers….”

The bill contains assurances that users will be able to control and delete their information. But it’s a government program; take those promises with a grain of salt. The largest grain of salt accompanies claims that use of the digital ID program will remain voluntary and confined to age verification.

“It’s unlikely that age and parental status verification would be its only use after its creation,” warn EFF’s Kelley and Cope. “Congress could easily change the law with future bills. Just look at the Social Security Number–once upon a time, it was only meant to allow Americans to participate in the federal retirement program. Even the Social Security Administration admits that the number ‘has come to be used as a nearly universal identifier.'” (That admission can be found here.)

Regulating Adults in the Name of Protecting Kids

The rest of the bill is largely an exercise by the bill’s sponsors in using government force to impose rules on minors’ online activity that parents either can’t be bothered to apply themselves or choose not to enforce because they flat-out disagree with the lawmakers over what rules are appropriate. That includes the total ban on those under 13 using social media along with parental consent and age-verification requirements for users between 13 and 18 years of age. Of course, you have to check everybody’s ID to know who is underage.

“The problems inherent in age verification systems are well known,” write Kelley and Cope. “All age verification systems are identity verification systems and surveillance systems. All age verification systems also impact all users because it’s necessary to confirm the age of all people in order to keep out one select age group. This means that every social media user would be subjected to potentially privacy-invasive identity verification if they want to use social media.”

Government Pushes Parents Out of the Way

Minus the “for the children” marketing pitch, legislation like this is a hard sell in anything resembling a free society. Most people would be hesitant to submit themselves to government identification and surveillance of their online activity. But few people want to be seen as callous towards kids, so “for the children” is an effective sales spiel for bad ideas—including bureaucratic rules and intrusive privacy violations.

But here’s the thing: There are already people responsible for regulating children’s online activity in the form of parents and guardians. Adults can set screen time limits for kids, check their browser histories, or just take their devices away and send them outside to play. If they don’t assert their authority in exactly the way some lawmakers might like, so be it. Free people get to raise their kids by their rules; they aren’t bound by the preferences of meddling neighbors or presumptuous legislators.

Sen. Schatz and friends say that they want to protect children from the dangers of social media. But if we want to preserve a free society for generations to come, what we really need to shield our kids from are lawmakers who cloak authoritarian proposals behind facades of concern.

The post Protecting Kids on Social Media Act Cloaks Attack on Privacy Behind Concern for Children appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/5vcmDn6
via IFTTT