GM "Stuffs Channels" At Fastest Pace In Its Post-Bankruptcy History; Volt Sales Plunge 32%

Moments ago, General Motors reported its October domestic car deliveries number, which at 226,402, was 31K better, or 15.7% higher, than the 195,674 from a year earlier, better than the 7.9% increase expected. Unlike the ISM, GM was quick to point the counterfactual, namely that sales picked up because, you guessed it, confidence returned once the government reopened in the second half of the month. “Chevrolet, Cadillac and Buick-GMC all performed well in the month, and the sales tempo really picked up after the government shutdown ended,” said Kurt McNeil, vice president, U.S. sales operations. Apparently, like houses, Americans just can’t buy cars if the government isn’t around to hold their hand.

Joking aside, one thing that was not mentioned in the otherwise blemish-free GM sales report, is that the biggest reason for the surge in GM “deliveries” was because the car company once again resorted to that old faithful gimmick: dealer channel stuffing. At 728K units in dealer inventory at month end, or 87 days supply, this was the highest number since March 2013, but far more disturbing, the monthly rate of increase was the highest since GM’s emergency as a “new” company from bankruptcy. And just to complete the picture, combining the past two month channel stuffing, we get 99,168 GM cars parked at dealer lots: the biggest two month jump in the restructured company’s history.

The full sales breakdown:

Last but not least, it seems that the electric car dream may be alive for Tesla (if only until something cooler and more expensive appears), but is all but dead for GM after a 32% plunge in Chevy Volt deliveries. If only GM could somehow charge 50% more for the car and make it a little more spontaneously combustible, all would be well.

Source: GM


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/AheWft55S1g/story01.htm Tyler Durden

GM “Stuffs Channels” At Fastest Pace In Its Post-Bankruptcy History; Volt Sales Plunge 32%

Moments ago, General Motors reported its October domestic car deliveries number, which at 226,402, was 31K better, or 15.7% higher, than the 195,674 from a year earlier, better than the 7.9% increase expected. Unlike the ISM, GM was quick to point the counterfactual, namely that sales picked up because, you guessed it, confidence returned once the government reopened in the second half of the month. “Chevrolet, Cadillac and Buick-GMC all performed well in the month, and the sales tempo really picked up after the government shutdown ended,” said Kurt McNeil, vice president, U.S. sales operations. Apparently, like houses, Americans just can’t buy cars if the government isn’t around to hold their hand.

Joking aside, one thing that was not mentioned in the otherwise blemish-free GM sales report, is that the biggest reason for the surge in GM “deliveries” was because the car company once again resorted to that old faithful gimmick: dealer channel stuffing. At 728K units in dealer inventory at month end, or 87 days supply, this was the highest number since March 2013, but far more disturbing, the monthly rate of increase was the highest since GM’s emergency as a “new” company from bankruptcy. And just to complete the picture, combining the past two month channel stuffing, we get 99,168 GM cars parked at dealer lots: the biggest two month jump in the restructured company’s history.

The full sales breakdown:

Last but not least, it seems that the electric car dream may be alive for Tesla (if only until something cooler and more expensive appears), but is all but dead for GM after a 32% plunge in Chevy Volt deliveries. If only GM could somehow charge 50% more for the car and make it a little more spontaneously combustible, all would be well.

Source: GM


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/AheWft55S1g/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Manufacturing ISM Prints At Highest Since April 2011; "No Impact From Government Shutdown"

So much for the government shutdown – as one of the just released manufacturing ISM respondents so candidly put it, “The government shutdown has not had any impact on our business that I
can determine, nor has it impacted any supplier shipments.” And speaking of the ISM itself, it naturally rejected everything that the Markit PMI noted, and printed at 56.4, beating expectations of a 55.0 print, the 5th beat in a row, and the highest print since April 2011. Sadly, it was not 66.4 or 76.4 to at least partially “confirm” the Chicago ISM surge. So while virtually all ISM components rose, with exports spiking by 5 points to 57.0, it was the employment index that dipped yet again, from 55.4 to 53.2, the lowest since June, but in the New Normal who needs jobs when one has Schrodinger diffusion indices to confuse everyone on a daily basis. Either way, while stocks did not like yesterday’s exploding Chicago PMI and dipped on fears of a December taper, today’s 2 years ISM high is one of those good news is good news instances, and ES soars as usual.

In chart format:

The report breakdown:

From the report:

The report was issued today by Bradley J. Holcomb, CPSM, CPSD, chair of the Institute for Supply Management™ Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. “The PMI™ registered 56.4 percent, an increase of 0.2 percentage point from September’s reading of 56.2 percent. The PMI™ has increased progressively each month since June, with October’s reading reflecting the highest PMI™ in 2013. The New Orders Index increased slightly in October by 0.1 percentage point to 60.6 percent, while the Production Index decreased by 1.8 percentage points to 60.8 percent. Both the New Orders and Production Indexes have registered above 60 percent for three consecutive months. The Employment Index registered 53.2 percent, a decrease of 2.2 percentage points compared to September’s reading of 55.4 percent. The panel’s comments are generally positive about the current business climate; however, there are mixed responses on whether the government shutdown and potential default have had any effect on October’s results.”

And the respondents:

  • “New business is booming.” (Textile Mills)
  • “The government shutting down and threatening to go into a default position is causing all kinds of concerns in our markets.” (Fabricated Metal Products)
  • “The government shutdown has not had any impact on our business that I can determine, nor has it impacted any supplier shipments.” (Chemical Products)
  • “Government spending continues to be slow in defense and military. The government shutdown and debt ceiling crisis did not affect business.” (Transportation Equipment)
  • “Telecom market — wireless and VOIP — appear to be spiking. We are very busy; busier than we have ever been.” (Computer & Electronic Products)
  • “Seasonal demand has not decreased at the typical pace. Market showing resiliency in the residential market.” (Primary Metals)
  • “Business continues to improve every month for the past nine months.” (Furniture & Related Products)
  • “Big Box Store discounting providing increased sales bump short term.” (Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products)
  • “Our customers continue to be cautious and are closely managing their purchases. Business continues to be flat to slightly down.” (Machinery)
  • “Outlook on general appliance market continues in a positive direction. Uncertainty, however, looms with unclear government direction pending.” (Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components)


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/uaAtKgMQhUQ/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Manufacturing ISM Prints At Highest Since April 2011; “No Impact From Government Shutdown”

So much for the government shutdown – as one of the just released manufacturing ISM respondents so candidly put it, “The government shutdown has not had any impact on our business that I
can determine, nor has it impacted any supplier shipments.” And speaking of the ISM itself, it naturally rejected everything that the Markit PMI noted, and printed at 56.4, beating expectations of a 55.0 print, the 5th beat in a row, and the highest print since April 2011. Sadly, it was not 66.4 or 76.4 to at least partially “confirm” the Chicago ISM surge. So while virtually all ISM components rose, with exports spiking by 5 points to 57.0, it was the employment index that dipped yet again, from 55.4 to 53.2, the lowest since June, but in the New Normal who needs jobs when one has Schrodinger diffusion indices to confuse everyone on a daily basis. Either way, while stocks did not like yesterday’s exploding Chicago PMI and dipped on fears of a December taper, today’s 2 years ISM high is one of those good news is good news instances, and ES soars as usual.

In chart format:

The report breakdown:

From the report:

The report was issued today by Bradley J. Holcomb, CPSM, CPSD, chair of the Institute for Supply Management™ Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. “The PMI™ registered 56.4 percent, an increase of 0.2 percentage point from September’s reading of 56.2 percent. The PMI™ has increased progressively each month since June, with October’s reading reflecting the highest PMI™ in 2013. The New Orders Index increased slightly in October by 0.1 percentage point to 60.6 percent, while the Production Index decreased by 1.8 percentage points to 60.8 percent. Both the New Orders and Production Indexes have registered above 60 percent for three consecutive months. The Employment Index registered 53.2 percent, a decrease of 2.2 percentage points compared to September’s reading of 55.4 percent. The panel’s comments are generally positive about the current business climate; however, there are mixed responses on whether the government shutdown and potential default have had any effect on October’s results.”

And the respondents:

  • “New business is booming.” (Textile Mills)
  • “The government shutting down and threatening to go into a default position is causing all kinds of concerns in our markets.” (Fabricated Metal Products)
  • “The government shutdown has not had any impact on our business that I can determine, nor has it impacted any supplier shipments.” (Chemical Products)
  • “Government spending continues to be slow in defense and military. The government shutdown and debt ceiling crisis did not affect business.” (Transportation Equipment)
  • “Telecom market — wireless and VOIP — appear to be spiking. We are very busy; busier than we have ever been.” (Computer & Electronic Products)
  • “Seasonal demand has not decreased at the typical pace. Market showing resiliency in the residential market.” (Primary Metals)
  • “Business continues to improve every month for the past nine months.” (Furniture & Related Products)
  • “Big Box Store discounting providing increased sales bump short term.” (Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products)
  • “Our customers continue to be cautious and are closely managing their purchases. Business continues to be flat to slightly down.” (Machinery)
  • “Outlook on general appliance market continues in a positive direction. Uncertainty, however, looms with unclear government direction pending.” (Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components)


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/uaAtKgMQhUQ/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Bubblespotting With Jim Bullard

Today’s “good Fed cop” award goes to St. Louis Fed president James Bullard who has some words of caution which neither he, nor anyone else at the FOMC, will pay attention to:

  • BULLARD SAYS RISK OF ASSET PRICE BUBBLES ‘HUGE ISSUE’ FOR FOMC
  • BULLARD: LOW RATES, NOT JUST QE, WOULD ACCOUNT FOR ANY BUBBLE
  • BULLARD SAYS LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION DECLINE BEGAN IN 2000

And the punchline:

  • BULLARD: `THERE MAY BE SOME OTHER’ ASSET BUBBLE `GOING ON’

Yes: the bubble of Fed “assets”

As for his conclusion…

  • BULLARD SEES U.S. ECONOMIC GROWTH ACCELERATING NEXT YEAR

… forgive us if this seems like a small case of deja vu.

  • Bullard Says Fed Shouldn’t Rush to Ease as Economy Accelerates – December 2011
  • Fed’s Bullard says U.S. growth may accelerate to 3% in 2012NAPMPMI Index – April 2012
  • Bullard Says Economic Growth Will Probably Accelerate – February 2013

So, thanks, but we’ll pass on any “acceleration”

Full Bullard slideshow (lots of pretty charts but no kittens):


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/igDHfZ2IuNo/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Final US Manufacturing PMI Prints At Lowest In One Year, Makes Mockery Of Chicago "Data"

If anyone needed confirmation that yesterday’s soaring Chicago PMI data (to the highest since March 2011) was a typical “Made In Chicago” fabrication, then look no further than today’s final MarkIt US Manufacturing PMI, which instead of soaring as its Chicago counterpart, tumbled from 52.8 to 51.8, the lowest print since October of 2011 as the report indicated “only modest improvement in business conditions”, “output growth weakest for over four years”, and “new orders increasing at the slowest pace since April.” Then again, in the New Normal world in which data reports separated by 24 hours are expected to indicate diametrically opposite things, this is quite normal, and if nothing else, absolutely bullish. Why? Who knows, but cratering Manufacturing Output is surely beneficial to the stock market, if not the actual economy.

Broken down by Components:

From the report:

Commenting on the final PMI data, Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit said: “While better than the earlier flash reading, the final PMI data indicate that the U.S. manufacturing sector ground to a near standstill in October. “Encouragingly, it looks like companies are expecting the slowdown to be temporary, most likely linked to the government shutdown, as indicated by an upturn in the rate of job creation.

 

“However, even the faster growth of employment remains only modest, consistent with barely any increase in official data on manufacturing payrolls. In addition, companies allowed their input inventories to fall at the fastest rate since 2009, highlighting widespread uncertainty towards the near-term outlook.

 

“The mixed signals from the survey therefore add to the likelihood that policymakers will need to wait for some time, perhaps a few months, until the picture clears  as to the true underlying health of the U.S. economy and its ability to create jobs.”

We get it: Chicago is good cop, MarkIt is bad cop whose purpose is to justify the taper delay.

Finally, spot the absolute contradiction between the MarkIt data, and the Chicago PMI euphoria:

Manufacturers linked the slight increase in output primarily to a weaker rise in new orders. Total incoming new work rose modestly and at the slowest pace in six months in October. Panellists commented on greater client demand in both the domestic and international markets. Nevertheless, a marginal increase in new export orders merely reversed a decline in September. Reflective of the weak trend for new orders, the quantity of inputs bought by manufacturing companies fell for the first time in almost three years in October. This was accompanied by the sharpest depletion of stocks of purchases since September 2009. Concurrently, suppliers’ delivery times continued to lengthen, with the latest increase in lead times the greatest for a year-and-a-half.

That’s ok: lies, like everything else, are bullish. Which is why we can only hope that today’s Manufacturing ISM due out shortly, prints in the triple digits. A lie of that magnitude will surely send stocks to turbo all time highs.

Source: Markit


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/oNoCWk0K3s8/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Final US Manufacturing PMI Prints At Lowest In One Year, Makes Mockery Of Chicago “Data”

If anyone needed confirmation that yesterday’s soaring Chicago PMI data (to the highest since March 2011) was a typical “Made In Chicago” fabrication, then look no further than today’s final MarkIt US Manufacturing PMI, which instead of soaring as its Chicago counterpart, tumbled from 52.8 to 51.8, the lowest print since October of 2011 as the report indicated “only modest improvement in business conditions”, “output growth weakest for over four years”, and “new orders increasing at the slowest pace since April.” Then again, in the New Normal world in which data reports separated by 24 hours are expected to indicate diametrically opposite things, this is quite normal, and if nothing else, absolutely bullish. Why? Who knows, but cratering Manufacturing Output is surely beneficial to the stock market, if not the actual economy.

Broken down by Components:

From the report:

Commenting on the final PMI data, Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit said: “While better than the earlier flash reading, the final PMI data indicate that the U.S. manufacturing sector ground to a near standstill in October. “Encouragingly, it looks like companies are expecting the slowdown to be temporary, most likely linked to the government shutdown, as indicated by an upturn in the rate of job creation.

 

“However, even the faster growth of employment remains only modest, consistent with barely any increase in official data on manufacturing payrolls. In addition, companies allowed their input inventories to fall at the fastest rate since 2009, highlighting widespread uncertainty towards the near-term outlook.

 

“The mixed signals from the survey therefore add to the likelihood that policymakers will need to wait for some time, perhaps a few months, until the picture clears  as to the true underlying health of the U.S. economy and its ability to create jobs.”

We get it: Chicago is good cop, MarkIt is bad cop whose purpose is to justify the taper delay.

Finally, spot the absolute contradiction between the MarkIt data, and the Chicago PMI euphoria:

Manufacturers linked the slight increase in output primarily to a weaker rise in new orders. Total incoming new work rose modestly and at the slowest pace in six months in October. Panellists commented on greater client demand in both the domestic and international markets. Nevertheless, a marginal increase in new export orders merely reversed a decline in September. Reflective of the weak trend for new orders, the quantity of inputs bought by manufacturing companies fell for the first time in almost three years in October. This was accompanied by the sharpest depletion of stocks of purchases since September 2009. Concurrently, suppliers’ delivery times continued to lengthen, with the latest increase in lead times the greatest for a year-and-a-half.

That’s ok: lies, like everything else, are bullish. Which is why we can only hope that today’s Manufacturing ISM due out shortly, prints in the triple digits. A lie of that magnitude will surely send stocks to turbo all time highs.

Source: Markit


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/oNoCWk0K3s8/story01.htm Tyler Durden

China Slams "Peeping Tom" America: "The Trust Fiasco Of America The Eavesdropper"

Three weeks ago, during the US government shutdown fiasco, and when there was legitimate concern if the US would begin prioritizing debt payments upon running out of cash, China’s official and most widely read press agency, Xinhua, slammed the US in “U.S. fiscal failure warrants a de-Americanized world” in which it called for a new world order, and an end to the reserve currency. Now, it is time for the follow up, with China kicking “America the eavesdropper” precisely when it is down.

From Xinhua:

The trust fiasco of America the Eavesdropper


The latest outburst of outcries and outrage across the world has laid bare that almighty America has at least one other anomalous addiction besides borrowing —  bugging.

The U.S. debt drama features a polarized and paralyzed Washington at the helm of the world’s largest economy. As nerve-racking as it is, such irresponsible behavior is a recurrent headache economic policymakers worldwide can bear with.

Yet the sole superpower’s spying saga is spicy on a heart-attack scale. It is particularly hurtful to those supposed to trust America the most — its allies.

The recent cascade of eye-popping disclosures depicts a hyperactive Uncle Sam prying into others’ secrets and even eavesdropping on dozens of heads of state.

It has been revealed that the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) monitored the phone conservations of at least 35 world leaders in 2006. And that is just a tip of the iceberg of the spook organization’s sprawling spying scheme.

Leaked documents show that the NSA has not only gained front-door access to countless Google and Yahoo user accounts through a court-approved process, but secretly broken into the main communications links connecting the two Internet giants’ respective data centers around the world to siphon information at will.

What is counterintuitive in the NSA forage is its nonsensical approach: relentless and indiscriminate like a vacuum cleaner. It just bugs everybody, even its closest allies in Europe.

In the most shocking revelation so far, Uncle Sam turned Madame Europa, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, into, as Deutsche Presse-Agentur puts it, “a dupe whose mobile phone conversations were for more than a decade a source of information for U.S. authorities.”

Merkel and her peers in the U.S. alliance have every reason to feel insulted and betrayed. At the very least, they deserve the kind of respect and trust that underpins the practice that air travelers do not have to fly naked.

The motivation behind America’s extensive eavesdropping is unclear. The explanations the White House has been forced to offer are far from explanatory, and the diorthosis President Barack Obama has promised seems all but skin-deep.

The half-heartedness stands in stark contrast with the pushfulness with which America accuses China of cyber-espionage, and the evasiveness marks a stunning retreat from the straightforwardness with which Washington reproves Beijing for alleged monetary manipulation.

The apparent application of a double standard only reinforces the image of a Janus-faced America. In the sunlight, it preaches; in the dark, it pries. On the offensive, it orates; on the defensive, it equivocates.

The wayward practice has now backfired, and the damage is increasing. Just as the borrowing addiction is shedding America’s economic credibility, the bugging obsession is draining its political and security trustworthiness — only with potentially more destructive consequences.

Trust is the first and foremost casualty. Common sense dictates that trust is a two-way street: One has to trust in order to be trusted. It is particularly true in friendships and alliances. America obviously failed to follow the simple rule.

If Washington did not knit the worldwide wiretapping web just because it could, then its pillage for information unveils an Uncle Sam too deeply entrenched in suspicion and isolation to treat anyone as a real friend.

Ironically enough, the bugging undermines the very thing it is supposed to protect — national security. As America pins its security on alliances, the tapping tale would sour its relationship with allies — and thus erode its security bedrock — more than any terrorist would be capable of.

The harm could go far beyond. For example, mutual trust is vital to China and America’s endeavor to build a new type of major-country relations. Washington’s lack of trust and hemorrhage of trustworthiness would only make the effort more difficult.

Needless to say, trust entails trade-offs, and the quid pro quos are not riskless. But the United States should be wise enough to know that to trust nobody is no less dangerous than to trust anybody.

As indicated in the still simmering spying scandal, the potential cost of excessive bugging could be way higher. Uncle Sam needs to remember what happened to the tailor in the Lady Godiva story — Peeping Tom was struck blind.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/0-RaP5yWdRc/story01.htm Tyler Durden

China Slams “Peeping Tom” America: “The Trust Fiasco Of America The Eavesdropper”

Three weeks ago, during the US government shutdown fiasco, and when there was legitimate concern if the US would begin prioritizing debt payments upon running out of cash, China’s official and most widely read press agency, Xinhua, slammed the US in “U.S. fiscal failure warrants a de-Americanized world” in which it called for a new world order, and an end to the reserve currency. Now, it is time for the follow up, with China kicking “America the eavesdropper” precisely when it is down.

From Xinhua:

The trust fiasco of America the Eavesdropper


The latest outburst of outcries and outrage across the world has laid bare that almighty America has at least one other anomalous addiction besides borrowing —  bugging.

The U.S. debt drama features a polarized and paralyzed Washington at the helm of the world’s largest economy. As nerve-racking as it is, such irresponsible behavior is a recurrent headache economic policymakers worldwide can bear with.

Yet the sole superpower’s spying saga is spicy on a heart-attack scale. It is particularly hurtful to those supposed to trust America the most — its allies.

The recent cascade of eye-popping disclosures depicts a hyperactive Uncle Sam prying into others’ secrets and even eavesdropping on dozens of heads of state.

It has been revealed that the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) monitored the phone conservations of at least 35 world leaders in 2006. And that is just a tip of the iceberg of the spook organization’s sprawling spying scheme.

Leaked documents show that the NSA has not only gained front-door access to countless Google and Yahoo user accounts through a court-approved process, but secretly broken into the main communications links connecting the two Internet giants’ respective data centers around the world to siphon information at will.

What is counterintuitive in the NSA forage is its nonsensical approach: relentless and indiscriminate like a vacuum cleaner. It just bugs everybody, even its closest allies in Europe.

In the most shocking revelation so far, Uncle Sam turned Madame Europa, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, into, as Deutsche Presse-Agentur puts it, “a dupe whose mobile phone conversations were for more than a decade a source of information for U.S. authorities.”

Merkel and her peers in the U.S. alliance have every reason to feel insulted and betrayed. At the very least, they deserve the kind of respect and trust that underpins the practice that air travelers do not have to fly naked.

The motivation behind America’s extensive eavesdropping is unclear. The explanations the White House has been forced to offer are far from explanatory, and the diorthosis President Barack Obama has promised seems all but skin-deep.

The half-heartedness stands in stark contrast with the pushfulness with which America accuses China of cyber-espionage, and the evasiveness marks a stunning retreat from the straightforwardness with which Washington reproves Beijing for alleged monetary manipulation.

The apparent application of a double standard only reinforces the image of a Janus-faced America. In the sunlight, it preaches; in the dark, it pries. On the offensive, it orates; on the defensive, it equivocates.

The wayward practice has now backfired, and the damage is increasing. Just as the borrowing addiction is shedding America’s economic credibility, the bugging obsession is draining its political and security trustworthiness — only with potentially more destructive consequences.

Trust is the first and foremost casualty. Common sense dictates that trust is a two-way street: One has to trust in order to be trusted. It is particularly true in friendships and alliances. America obviously failed to follow the simple rule.

If Washington did not knit the worldwide wiretapping web just because it could, then its pillage for information unveils an Uncle Sam too deeply entrenched in suspicion and isolation to treat anyone as a real friend.

Ironically enough, the bugging undermines the very thing it is supposed to protect — national security. As America pins its security on alliances, the tapping tale would sour its relationship with allies — and thus erode its security bedrock — more than any terrorist would be capable of.

The harm could go far beyond. For example, mutual trust is vital to China and America’s endeavor to build a new type of major-country relations. Washington’s lack of trust and hemorrhage of trustworthiness would only make the effort more difficult.

Needless to say, trust entails trade-offs, and the quid pro quos are not riskless. But the United States should be wise enough to know that to trust nobody is no less dangerous than to trust anybody.

As indicated in the still simmering spying scandal, the potential cost of excessive bugging could be way higher. Uncle Sam needs to remember what happened to the tailor in the Lady Godiva story — Peeping Tom was struck blind.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/0-RaP5yWdRc/story01.htm Tyler Durden