Thaddeus Russell on the Progressive Lineage of Macklemore’s And Lorde’s Attacks On The Pleasures Of The Poor

One of the more remarkable
results of the rise of industrial capitalism was that, for the
first time in human history, the poorest classes of people gained
access to luxury goods. Another remarkable result was that
wealthier people who claimed to be allies of the poor told them
this was bad for them. Recent developments in American popular
music demonstrate that this paradox lives on. Last Sunday night,
Macklemore and Lorde, artists who have built their careers upon
songs attacking the desire for luxuries among African-Americans,
received the highest commendations from the music establishment in
the form of multiple Grammy awards. Thaddeus Russell says their
songs continue a long tradition, rooted in progressivism, of
protests against the pleasures of the poor.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1bhHTfz
via IFTTT

Nearly Half Of America Lives Paycheck-To-Paycheck

While stocks are still near record highs and the inventory-stuffed picture of economic growth for the US ticks up to its fastest pace in 2 years, Time reports that a study (below) by the Corporation for Enterprise Development (CFED) shows nearly half of Americans are living in a state of “persistent economic insecurity,” that makes it “difficult to look beyond immediate needs and plan for a more secure future.” In other words, too many Americans are living paycheck to paycheck… but their findings get worse.

 

 

As Time notes,

The CFED calls these folks “liquid asset poor,” and its report finds that 44% of Americans are living with less than $5,887 in savings for a family of four.

 

The plight of these folks is compounded by the fact that the recession ravaged many Americans’ credit scores to the point that now 56% percent of us have subprime credit.

 

 

That means that if emergencies arise, many Americans are forced to resort to high-interest debt from credit cards or payday loans.

And this financial insecurity isn’t just affected the lower classes. According to the CFED, one-quarter of middle-class households also fall into the category of “liquid asset poor.”

Geographically, most of the economically insecure are clustered in the South and West, with Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama, Nevada, and Arkansas being the states with the highest percentage of financially insecure.

 

 

Full study below:

2014 Scorecard Report


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1fkwbA6 Tyler Durden

Blast from the Past – Adam Kokesh Interviews Charlie Shrem (October 2012)

Last week, I wrote an article expressing my disgust at the selective prosecution of BitInstant CEO Charlie Shrem. The piece was titled, Some Money Launderers are More Equal than Others Part 2 – CEO of BitInstant is Arrested. The aggressiveness of the prosecution and the arrest itself reminded me of what has been done to countless others such as Aaron Swartz and Barrett Brown, to name a few.

Since then, many others have also written about the disturbing nature of this arrest, the best of which in my opinion came from Falkvinge, founder of the Pirate Party, and someone who I have highlighted in the past. He recently wrote an article titled: Harassment Arrest of Charlie Shrem Shows Dangerously Repressive U.S. Police System. What is so interesting about this piece, is how he describes what Shrem did is in no way shape or form “money laundering” under any reasonable definition. He writes:

Charlie Shrem has been arrested at JFK airport and charged with money laundering. …accused of selling over $1 million in bitcoins to Silk Road users, who would then use them to buy drugs and other illicit items.

So what?

That’s not money laundering. That’s the exact opposite of money laundering. Money laundering is a well-defined concept; it’s when you take money that has been achieved through illegal means and give them a legitimate source, concealing the past of that particular piece of wealth.

What allegedly happened here was that Shrem sold one million USD worth of bitcoin to one or more individuals, and these means were later used in turn to purchase contraband from Silk Road, obviously without Shrem having any say about it. That’s neither criminal nor money laundering – when you sell an asset, whether a car, a house, or bitcoin, you’re not liable in the slightest if that asset is later exchanged for contraband by its new rightful owner. Nor are you in any way, shape or form required to act even if you know it’s been later exchanged for contraband by its new owner, and in particular, you’re not guilty of money laundering.

Money laundering is specifically when you take actions to turn black money into white, and not when you sell white money to somebody else and they turn it black without your consent. There’s so much wrong with this bullshit arrest on every conceivable level.

Indeed, this seems to be the case. That said, I think the government’s argument is that Shrem was intentionally selling the bitcoin to this person knowing they he wanted to buy drugs with it, and that person felt gaining the BTC from Shrem would make his coins more anonymous.

Again, so what? Who did Shrem actually harm here? Who was victimized? Furthermore, let’s say what he did could be considered “money laundering.” It was one million dollars; ONE MILLION. I mean HSBC interns launder that amount in their sleep.

With all that off my chest, let’s finally get to the video. The following interview of Shrem by Adam Kokesh (a former Iraq vet turned activist who recently spent time in jail himself) from back in October 2012 is a really great watch. To hear these two highly intelligent and passionate patriots discuss the concept and potential of Bitcoin when it was a mere $11 per BTC is really entreating. In particular, I was impressed by Adam’s ability to so quickly grasp just what Bitcoin is and what it could be at such an early stage.

Enjoy this conversation with these two “felons.”

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger

Like this post?
Donate bitcoins: 1LefuVV2eCnW9VKjJGJzgZWa9vHg7Rc3r1

 Follow me on Twitter.

Blast from the Past – Adam Kokesh Interviews Charlie Shrem (October 2012) originally appeared on A Lightning War for Liberty on February 1, 2014.

continue reading

from A Lightning War for Liberty http://ift.tt/1ksRHWP
via IFTTT

Europe Is Set To Mandate "Remote Stopping Device" In All Cars For Police Use

Submitted by Mike Krieger of Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

Well this sounds like one of the worst ideas I have heard of in a long time. Naturally, it would emerge from the EU, the sorriest excuse for a fake government the world has ever seen.

While I have reported previously on regulatory efforts to put all sorts of invasive mandatory devices in U.S. automobiles (from October of last year Big Brother is Coming to Your Car), this idea from the EU take things to a whole other level of insanity.

From the BBC:

A device that would enable police to stop vehicles remotely is being considered by an EU-wide official working group, it has emerged.

 

The feasibility of such technology is being examined by members of the European Network of Law Enforcement Technology Services (Enlets).

 

The technology could impact on both road safety and civil liberties.

Civil liberties? What are those?

The BBC understands it would take several years for any such technical proposal to be drafted.

 

One EU document, from 4 December, sets out the Enlets 2014-20 work programme as including: “Remote Stopping Vehicles”.

 

It says “this project will work on a technological solution that can be a ‘build in standard’ for all cars that enter the European market”.

 

It is not clear what cost implications that would have for car makers.

No, but the implications for the peasant class are crystal clear.

The work of Enlets is little known and has emerged in part through documents published by the civil liberties campaign group Statewatch.

These people are out of control.

Full article here.

 

[ZH: Perhaps this utter insanity would be more palatable with a different marketing angle? At least we can have a laugh as the encroachment on personal privacy and civil liberties continues unabated]


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1ksBvou Tyler Durden

Europe Is Set To Mandate “Remote Stopping Device” In All Cars For Police Use

Submitted by Mike Krieger of Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

Well this sounds like one of the worst ideas I have heard of in a long time. Naturally, it would emerge from the EU, the sorriest excuse for a fake government the world has ever seen.

While I have reported previously on regulatory efforts to put all sorts of invasive mandatory devices in U.S. automobiles (from October of last year Big Brother is Coming to Your Car), this idea from the EU take things to a whole other level of insanity.

From the BBC:

A device that would enable police to stop vehicles remotely is being considered by an EU-wide official working group, it has emerged.

 

The feasibility of such technology is being examined by members of the European Network of Law Enforcement Technology Services (Enlets).

 

The technology could impact on both road safety and civil liberties.

Civil liberties? What are those?

The BBC understands it would take several years for any such technical proposal to be drafted.

 

One EU document, from 4 December, sets out the Enlets 2014-20 work programme as including: “Remote Stopping Vehicles”.

 

It says “this project will work on a technological solution that can be a ‘build in standard’ for all cars that enter the European market”.

 

It is not clear what cost implications that would have for car makers.

No, but the implications for the peasant class are crystal clear.

The work of Enlets is little known and has emerged in part through documents published by the civil liberties campaign group Statewatch.

These people are out of control.

Full article here.

 

[ZH: Perhaps this utter insanity would be more palatable with a different marketing angle? At least we can have a laugh as the encroachment on personal privacy and civil liberties continues unabated]


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1ksBvou Tyler Durden

Stanton Peele: Government Says You Can’t Overcome Addiction, Contrary to What Government Research Shows

The American Board of Addiction Medicine
and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) believe that people
never overcome addiction. Yet, people recover from addiction all
the time. How do we know? Stanton Peele points to government
research conducted by the NIDA and its sister agency (with which it
is soon to be combined) the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and
Alcoholism that tells us just that. 

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1cH2o6m
via IFTTT

Italy Unveils Most Bizarre Bank Bailout Yet

The biggest problem facing European banks – one we highlighted most recently yesterday when we showed the latest 20% surge in Spanish Banco Popular Non-Performing Loans to a fresh record – and one we have been covering since 2010, which as of 2012 amounted to some $4.5 trillion that needs to be “remedied” – is the staggering amount of bad debt on the books of Europe’s numerous banks, the bulk of which especially in the periphery are cojoined with their sovereign host in an unbreakable bond which despite Europe’s theatrical attempts to sever, only keeps getting stronger.

But while, so far at least, the conventional “under the table” can-kicking European bailout mechanism involved a process whereby banks would issue bonds with a sovereign “guarantee”, then promptly repo them to the ECB at virtually no haircut as the Goldman alum-led central bank did everything in its power to keep injecting liquidity in an insolvent continental banking system (while everyone pretended to not realize what was going on as the “A-ha” moment of public epiphany would mean the emperor would suddenly have no clothes and the jig was up), this week things changed.

On Wednesday, Italy’s government voted final approval to a decree hiking the value of Bank of Italy’s share capital from €156K to €7.5 billion – something that had not been done since the 1930s. Of course, politicians determining the fictitious value of a central bank is one thing, as idiotic as it may be. However, what is truly preposterous is the covert bailout that accompanies the decree: a key part of the decision was setting a 3% ceiling on the stake that the bank’s shareholders can own in the central bank. This means, as Reuters reports, that Intessa and UniCredit, currently the central bank’s largest shareholders with stakes of 42 percent and 22 percent respectively – not to mention two of Italy’s most NPL-heavy banks – will have to sell the bulk of their central bank “equity” stakes. And who will they sell them to? Why the central bank itself, and in return they will pocket up to €3.5 billion ($4.7 billion) from the sale of their central bank holdings. Said otherwise, Italy took not only bizarro accounting, but also monetary financing of insolvent banks by the monetary authority, and thus Italy’s taxpayers, to the truly next level.

Some more details on this supremely grotesque, and certainly not last, bailout from Reuters:

The decree says the banks have three years to comply with the new rules.

 

Should Intesa Sanpaolo sell a 39 percent stake, it could cash in up to 2.3 billion euros before tax according to analysts’ calculations based on the new share capital of the Bank of Italy.

 

UniCredit could pocket a gross capital gain of around 1.15 billion euros from the disposal of its 19 percent stake in the central bank.

 

The only other lender with a stake in the central bank exceeding 3 percent is Carige which stands to reap a capital gain of 73 million euros if it sold part of its holding to comply with the decree.

And the cherry on top, confirming that Basel III is the biggest regulatory supervision joke conceived in Basel whose only purpose is to perpetuate a system of insolvent banks no matter the taxpayer cost, is that the capital gains from the sale would be used to boost the banks’ core capital.

For those asking – yes: Italy’s central bank just made sure Intessa and UniCredit pass Europe’s stress test with flying color courtesy of a direct $4.7 billion deposit.

Sadly, this most brazen bailout will only benefit the abovementioned two banks:  “The ownership limit will benefit only Intesa Sanpaolo and UniCredit,” said Fabrizio Bernardi, analyst at Fidentiis Equities. “It will not help, however, Monte dei Paschi di Siena and Banca Carige, which are desperate for capital,” he added. Monte dei Paschi has to raise 3 billion euros later this year to pay back state aid, while Carige needs to boost its capital by 800 million euros.

That’s ok, we are sure the MIT diaspora of brilliant bankers who rule the world (literally) will come up with some another ingenious plan to mask the epic insolvency of Monte Paschi in the 11th hour, kicking the can for another several months, until the next leg lower in the European depression forces Europe’s banks to get yet another bailout, and so on, until one day there are no more people left to fool.

Perhaps the piece de resistance is that not only is the central bank bailing out insolvent banks, but it is indirectly also funding the sovereign: the new law will also help public finances thanks to the taxation of the capital gain the banks will register.

Simply remarkable.

And it would have been even more unbelievable had nobody in Italy’s parliament figured out this was simply yet another taxpayer funded gift to Italy’s banks. Somebody, however, did. Guardian reports that late on Wednesday, MPs of Beppe Grillo’s M5S “stormed the government benches, put on symbolic gags and kept up a barrage of whistling after the speaker, Laura Boldrini, cut short the debate and ordered a vote on a complicated and intensely controversial measure to square Italy’s public accounts. One of Grillo’s followers said an MP from the governing majority had slapped her during the disorder. Opposition MPs claim that the measure would hand more than €7bn (£5.8bn) of taxpayers’ money to the banks.” Of course, what better way to fast-track yet another taxpayer bailout than to cut any debate short.

And this being Italy, where the phrase “political circus” is redundant, things just went uphill from here:

Members of the far-right opposition Brothers of Italy party showered chocolate coins on the government’s representatives in the chamber and unfurled an Italian flag. After the vote was taken, Boldrini’s party colleagues in the radical Left Ecology and Freedom (SEL) party broke into a chorus of the old partisan song Bella Ciao, prompting the M5S to respond with a rendition of the national anthem.

 

 

It is the first time since the foundation of the Italian republic after the second world war that a speaker has used the power to cut short a debate in this way. If she had not intervened, the decree at the centre of the dispute would have lapsed at midnight and Italian homeowners would have been landed with a bill for €2.2bn.

 

Enrico Letta’s left-right coalition government won the vote by 236 to 209.

 

The decree was the latest stage in the government’s tortuous efforts to fulfil an election pledge by Silvio Berlusconi to scrap an unpopular tax on first homes – and to do so without increasing Italy’s already vast, €2tn public debt. Part of the cost is being passed to banks. 

 

But the decree included provisions for an increase in the capital of Italy’s central bank – a move that will swell the balance sheets of the commercial banks that are shareholders in the Bank of Italy.

 

Since the central bank is to use its statutory reserves for the increase, the M5S argued that it amounted to a gift of more than €7bn to the banks.

And they were right. But that’s ok – at least everyone get’s to pretend for a few months longer that the system, which now needs ever more creative bailouts, is solvent.


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1ijwRIL Tyler Durden

Google Reports & Reggie Middleton Wins CNBC Stock Draft 2nd time in a row, with the same stock

Google reported Thursday later afternoon and the early morning traders didn’t know what to make of the numbers – with the stock gyrating up and down. The following day, CNBC’s 2nd annual sitck draft stock picking contest ended. Guess what happened? For the impatient, I cna put the video here…


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1nAmnrs Reggie Middleton

Google Reports & Reggie Middleton Wins CNBC Stock Draft 2nd time in a row, with the same stock

Google reported Thursday later afternoon and the early morning traders didn’t know what to make of the numbers – with the stock gyrating up and down. The following day, CNBC’s 2nd annual sitck draft stock picking contest ended. Guess what happened? For the impatient, I cna put the video here…


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1nAmnrs Reggie Middleton

Gibson Commemorates Fed Raid with Government Series II Les Paul

Two years after Gibson factories in Tennessee were raided by
government agents, the venerable guitar manufacturer has released a
special Government Series II Les Paul. As the
press release explains
:

Great Gibson electric guitars have long been a means of
fighting the establishment, so when the powers that be confiscated
stocks of tonewoods from the Gibson factory in Nashville—only to
return them once there was a resolution and the investigation
ended—it was an event worth celebrating. Introducing the Government
Series II Les Paul, a striking new guitar from Gibson USA for 2014
that suitably marks this infamous time in Gibson’s
history. 

…Each Government Series II Les Paul also includes a
genuine piece of Gibson USA history in its solid rosewood
fingerboard, which is made from wood returned to Gibson by the US
government after the resolution. 

Reason TV reported on the Gibson case back in 2012. Original
text from February 23, 2012 video is below. 

“They…come in with weapons, they seized a
half-million dollars worth of property, they shut our factory down,
and they have not charged us with anything,” says Gibson Guitars CEO
Henry Juszkiewicz, referring to the August 2011 raid on his
Nashville and Memphis factories by agents from the Departments of
Homeland Security and Fish & Wildlife.

The feds raided Gibson for using an inappropriate
tariff code on wood from India, which is a violation of
the anti-trafficking statute known as The Lacey Act. At issue is
not whether the wood in question was endangered, but whether the
wood was the correct level of thickness and finish before
being exported from India. “India is wanting to ensure that raw
wood is not exported without some labor content from India,” says
Juskiewicz.

Andrea Johnson of the Environmental Investigation Agency
(EIA)
 counters that “it’s not up to Gibson to decide which
laws…they want to respect.” She points out that Gibson had
previously been raided under The Lacey Act for imports from
Madagascar.

This much is clear: The government
has yet to file any charges or allow Gibson a day in court to
makes its case, much less retrieve its materials. “This is not
about responsible forestry and sustainable wood or illegal logging,
this is about a bureaucratic law,” argues Juszkiewicz, who
testified last year before a congressional hearing convened by
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.). It is, he says, ”a blank check for
abuse.”

About 6 minutes.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1abn8Un
via IFTTT