Hillary Clinton Knows Nothing


Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton | Action Press/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom

Hillary Clinton has nothing to say. The former secretary of state and former Democratic presidential candidate faced congressional Republicans in a closed-door deposition yesterday. The subject? What, if anything, she knew about Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal activity, or misdeeds by his associate Ghislaine Maxwell. Her answer: nada, nothing, zilch

“I do not recall ever encountering Mr. Epstein. I never flew on his plane or visited his island, homes or offices. I have nothing to add to that,” she said in prepared remarks. Move along. Nothing to see here. 

And nothing you could see, even if you, for some reason, wanted to. Although Clinton had pushed for press access, the session was closed to outsiders. At one point, the session was halted after Rep. Lauren Boebert (R–Colo.) shared a photo that was then posted on social media by right-wing personality Benny Johnson. Chaos! 

Apparently, Republicans also asked her about UFOs and Pizzagate

I am, unfortunately, well-enough versed in the various characters and subplots involved that I basically understand what’s going on. But this sort of thing increasingly defines politics in the Trump era. I have to imagine that to many Americans, this sort of story comes across like some sort of impenetrable too-online soap opera, or a pro-wrestling match.

Former President Bill Clinton is set to testify today.

Jobs, Blocked. Block, the tech-finance company run by Twitter (now X) founder Jack Dorsey, is laying off approximately 4,000 of its 10,000 employees. 

In a message to employees, Dorsey says the reason for the layoffs isn’t that the company is doing poorly. Rather, it’s that agentic tools—task-executing AI agents like those offered by Anthropic—are changing the way the company understands work. 

“Something has changed,” Dorsey wrote in a post on X. “We’re already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that’s accelerating rapidly.”

It’s possible that AI is just an excuse for normal layoffs after overhiring. And I don’t think that AI will herald the end of work as we know it, at least not in the foreseeable future. 

But I do think we will see significant disruptions to the labor market over the next few years, especially in fields that employ a large number of coders and white-collar clerical workers. AI can’t yet fully replace human judgment or creativity, though it may be more capable on those fronts than many people currently believe. But it’s becoming quite adept at executing multistep assigned tasks that can be performed on a computer. 

This will be quite difficult for some people. Job loss is painful. But it will also be an opportunity for innovation and entrepreneurship, as the cost of building and executing a good idea, especially a good idea that primarily involves software and information organization, drops dramatically. 

Batman, bought. Last year, storied movie studio Warner Bros., which also owns media properties CNN and D.C. Comics, went up for sale. After rumors and reports that Paramount—recently purchased by David Ellison, son of Oracle cofounder David Ellison—was the most likely suitor, a twist emerged: Streaming behemoth Netflix had made the deal, with an offer valued at about $83 billion. 

Since then, Paramount has aggressively sought to counter Netflix, raising its initial offer while hinting that its purchase was much more likely to pass regulatory review, since Larry Ellison is a major Donald Trump donor. Trump was reportedly quite interested in the fate of CNN, which is owned by Warner Bros. 

Yesterday, after Warner Bros. board announced that it preferred Paramount’s most recent offer of $31 per share—or about $111 billion—Netflix backed out. Paramount won the bidding war. Once the deal is formally approved, D.C. Comics stalwart Batman (and Superman) will have a new owner. 

Looked at one way, this appears to be a clean deal. Paramount simply offered more. And Warner Bros. has been sold multiple times over the years; everyone wants to own Batman. 

But reports have consistently said that part of Paramount’s pitch to Warner Bros. has been that it believes it has a better chance of regulatory approval, owing to its friendliness with Trump. Notably, Netflix chief Ted Sarandos was reportedly in Washington, D.C., yesterday, meeting with federal officials about the deal. And earlier this week, Trump encouraged Netflix to fire a board member, Susan Rice, who’d criticized corporations for taking “a knee to Trump?” 

It’s worth asking: Was this ultimately a political deal? Did Netflix back out because federal approval looked dicey? Did Trump essentially decide who would own CNN? 

Political interference in big mergers existed before Trump. Under Joe Biden, Lina Khan’s Federal Trade Commission maintained an almost reflexive stance against large mergers of any kind. But it remains immensely frustrating that big deals have to run through the whims of whoever happens to occupy the Oval Office. 


Scenes from Washington, D.C.: “If you are a trained intelligence officer, you’re going to the restaurant with the express purpose of developing and cultivating a source that has access to the White House.” The Washingtonian covers the relationship between spies and restaurants in D.C.


QUICK HITS

  • The U.S. State Department told Americans in Israel: “Persons may wish to consider leaving Israel while commercial flights are available.” Ominous.
  • For the first time in three years, mortgage rates fell below 6 percent. This could help ease the “lock-in” effect, in which buyers with low mortgage interest rates refuse to sell because their next home purchase will come with a much higher rate, that has plagued the housing market for the last several years. 
  • Bloomberg looks at the boom in Manhattan megamansions
  • If you’re a cinephile, you’ve probably watched at least one of those Criterion Library shorts, in which movie stars and directors talk through their picks from the boutique disc-producer’s famous, closet-sized library. Well, now you can apply to be that library’s coordinator
  • The Trump-Mamdani bromance continues. 

The post Hillary Clinton Knows Nothing appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/o5K8k9d
via IFTTT

OpenAI Secures Record $110 Billion Funding Round Backed By Amazon, Nvidia, & SoftBank

OpenAI Secures Record $110 Billion Funding Round Backed By Amazon, Nvidia, & SoftBank

OpenAI has closed a new funding round that could total $110 billion, valuing the ChatGPT maker at $730 billion pre-money and potentially putting it on course for an IPO in the second half of the year, according to a new Financial Times report.

The three investors in the deal are Nvidia, Amazon, and SoftBank. People familiar with the deal say this opens the pathway to the public markets at the end of this year.

Breaking down funding numbers by strategic investors:

  • Amazon: $15 billion upfront, plus $35 billion later if OpenAI goes public or achieves AGI

  • Nvidia: $30 billion

  • SoftBank: $30 billion

  • Another $10 billion may come from sovereign wealth funds and other investors

The FT noted that the new funding round comes on top of the $40 billion already on OpenAI’s balance sheet, giving the company more runway to rapidly expand and develop new models and AI infrastructure. OpenAI expects to remain unprofitable until 2030, when management forecasts it will turn free cash flow positive.

In a separate release, Amazon detailed its major multi-year partnership with OpenAI, centered on enterprise AI infrastructure, distribution, and custom model development.

Here are the highlights of the Amazon-OpenAI investment:

  • Amazon will invest $50 billion in OpenAI, with $15 billion upfront and another $35 billion later if certain conditions are met.

  • AWS and OpenAI will jointly build a “Stateful Runtime Environment” powered by OpenAI models and offered through Amazon Bedrock, aimed at helping customers run AI apps and agents with persistent context, memory, tool access, and compute.

  • AWS becomes the exclusive third-party cloud distribution provider for OpenAI Frontier, OpenAI’s enterprise platform for building and managing teams of AI agents.

  • OpenAI will expand its AWS infrastructure commitment by $100 billion over 8 years, on top of an existing $38 billion agreement.

  • As part of that, OpenAI will use roughly 2 gigawatts of AWS Trainium capacity, spanning Trainium3 and future Trainium4 chips, to support Frontier, Stateful Runtime, and other advanced workloads.

  • OpenAI and Amazon will also develop custom OpenAI-based models for Amazon’s customer-facing apps, giving Amazon teams another model option alongside its in-house Nova family.

“OpenAI and Amazon share a belief that AI should show up in ways that are practical and genuinely useful for people,” OpenAI boss Sam Altman stated, adding, “Combining OpenAI’s models with Amazon’s infrastructure and global reach helps us put powerful AI into the hands of businesses and users at real scale.”

Altman commented on today’s announcement, saying, “As long as revenue keeps growing, the deals are not circular.”

Well…

Let’s revisit our notes on the “circle jerk” AI vendor financing schemes as we’ve pointed out since last fall (read here & here).

Related:

The circle jerk keeps getting larger.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 02/27/2026 – 09:10

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/f2dpl0A Tyler Durden

US Begins Evacuating Some Embassy Staff In Israel ‘While Flights Still Available’

US Begins Evacuating Some Embassy Staff In Israel ‘While Flights Still Available’

“Persons may wish to consider leaving Israel while commercial flights are available,” the US State Department announced Friday, signaling that US strikes on Iran could be imminent,.

It provided confirmation the US government has begun evacuating “non-emergency” personnel from the embassy in Israel and their family members, citing “safety risks” amid growing tensions with Iran.

via AFP

The new urgent announcement also strongly suggests that whatever military action ensues, it will mostly likely involve a joint operation between the US and Israel. Some have warned that Washington is essentially about to go to war on behalf of what are fundamentally Israel’s interests in the region.

People in Israel would further be at risk given the potential for Hezbollah to renew strikes on the country’s north, and then there’s the threat of Houthi attacks from the south – as happened in the last conflict in June and prior.

Fox correspondent Lucas Tomlinson has noted that the last time the embassy issued such an evacuation notice it occurred just eight days before Operation Midnight Hammer (the June strikes).

Another regional journalist, Idrees Ali, as observed: “Many of the things that happened before the United States and Israel struck Iran last year are happening now.”

But this time around the military build-up by the United States is much, much bigger – and days ago hit levels not seen since the 2003 Bush-ordered invasion of Iraq.

Axios also confirms that while the US Embassy is still operating for now, “US ambassador Mike Huckabee wrote in a message to embassy staff that whoever wants to leave the country should do so Friday.”

The State Dept. notice states further, “The ambassador, diplomats and U.S. personnel working on assistance to U.S. citizens, security, military, political and intelligence affairs will stay in the country.”

Canada has also newly issued a warning Friday for its citizens to leave Iran and the Mideast region, warning about the near future availability of commercial travel.

Starting the countdown to yet another major US initiated war in the Middle East?…

This adds to a growing list of countries telling their population to avoid the region or leave, including: Finland, Serbia, Poland, Sweden, India, Greek Cyprus, Singapore, Germany, Brazil, and others. China has also told its citizens in Israel to be prepared for an emergency and to prepare to leave the country. Any Chinese traveling in Iran are also being told to depart immediately.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 02/27/2026 – 08:50

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/HSyA9Dr Tyler Durden

Surging Services Costs Spark Unexpected Surge In US Producer Prices In January

Surging Services Costs Spark Unexpected Surge In US Producer Prices In January

US Producer Prices came in hotter than expected in January, with the headline PPI rising 0.5% MoM (vs +0.3% exp), higher than the revised +0.4% MoM in December. This left Producer Prices up 2.9% YoY (hotter than expected but below December’s +3.0%)…

Source: Bloomberg

Under the hood, we see a surge in Services costs (not tariff related) dominated the rise in PPI (while Energy saw deflation)

Final demand services: The index for final demand services advanced 0.8% in January, the largest increase since moving up 0.9% in July 2025. Most of the January rise in prices for final demand services can be traced to margins for final demand trade services, which jumped 2.5 percent. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) Prices for final demand transportation and warehousing services advanced 1.0 percent, while the index for final demand services less trade, transportation, and warehousing was unchanged.

  • Product detail: Over 20% of the January increase in prices for final demand services is attributable to a 14.4% jump in margins for professional and commercial equipment wholesaling. The indexes for apparel, footwear, and accessories retailing; chemicals and allied products wholesaling; bundled wired telecommunications access services; health, beauty, and optical goods retailing; and food and alcohol retailing also moved higher. Conversely, prices for system software publishing fell 12.2 percent. The indexes for guestroom rental and for apparel wholesaling also decreased.

Final demand goods: Prices for final demand goods moved down 0.3% in January, the largest decrease since falling 0.7% in March 2025. Leading the January decline, the index for final demand energy dropped 2.7 percent. Prices for final demand foods decreased 1.5 percent. In contrast, the index for final demand goods less foods and energy advanced 0.7 percent.

  • Product detail: Nearly 80 percent of the January decline in prices for final demand goods can be traced to the index for gasoline, which fell 5.5 percent. Prices for chicken eggs, electric power, gas fuels, fresh fruits and melons, and ethanol also moved lower. Conversely, the index for search, detection, navigation, and guidance systems jumped 15.5 percent. Prices for nonferrous metals and for pork also rose.

The Energy component of PPI could be about to re-accelerate…

Core PPI (ex food and energy) surged 0.8% MoM and is up 3.6% YoY (both hotter than expected) – the fast pace of price increase since March 2025…

Source: Bloomberg

Margin pressures remain as input prices rise faster than output prices…

The bottom line is that this will likely lead to a hotter than expected Core PCE print – something The Fed watches closely.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 02/27/2026 – 08:42

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/dPis3KU Tyler Durden

First Amendment Protects Right to Use Nudity as Protest (There, a Pro-Trans Protest) in Public

[1.] Some states and municipalities public nudity generally, but some, like Washington, ban only nudity that is “lascivious,” which is to say involving some sexual motivation (to oversimplify somewhat).

Does the First Amendment permit such bans when applied to expressive nudity? You can read the badly fractured decision of the Court in Barnes v. Glen Threatre, Inc. (1991) for yourselves and figure out what it means as a precedent. Five Justices voted to uphold a total ban on public nudity, even as to places where only consenting adults are present (such as strip clubs). But Justice Souter, whose vote was necessary to that result, stressed that nude dancing could be banned to prevent “secondary effects” such as “prostitution, sexual assault, and other criminal activity.” It’s not clear then how that holding would apply to cases where the nudity is not sexual and is unlikely to yield such effects.

[2.] Nudity and recalls of elected officials, together! Under Washington law, executive officials can be recalled if enough voters petition, and then if a majority of voters so vote. But there has to be some allegation of “some act or acts of malfeasance or misfeasance while in office, or … violat[ion of] his oath of office,” and courts can reject recall grounds if they don’t adequately allege such misconduct.

It’s not like a normally scheduled election, where voters can throw the bums out for any reason they want. But it’s also not like an impeachment process, which is supposed to involve a trial before legislators who decide whether an official’s actions fit within the category of “high crimes and misdemeanors.” Different states have different rules on the subject (see this 2021 post).

[3.] With that in mind, here are the facts from In the Matter of Recall of Lauser, decided yesterday by the Washington Supreme Court (majority opinion by Justice Charles Johnson):

On March 31, 2025, International Transgender Day of Visibility, Stevenson City Councilmember Lucy Lauser was protesting with a group of demonstrators outside Skamania County Courthouse. As part of the protest, Lauser exposed her breasts with the words “MY BODY IS NOT A SIN” written on her chest. She was approached by police officers who spoke with her regarding RCW 9A.88.010 (indecent exposure). Lauser advised she was expressing her First Amendment right and declined to cover her breasts. She was not arrested or charged.

City Councilmember Lauser is a transgender woman who was elected to Stevenson City Council in 2023. She is the first openly transgender person to serve in elected office in Stevenson. International Transgender Day of Visibility is an annual event dedicated to celebrating transgender people and raising awareness of discrimination faced by transgender people.

Respondent Kathleen Fitzgerald, a Stevenson resident, brought this recall petition to Skamania County Superior Court, alleging that Lauser has not honored her oath of office, which amounts to malfeasance and justifies a recall. Fitzgerald alleged that Lauser committed malfeasance by violating RCW 9A.88.010.

The Skamania County Superior Court found the recall charge factually and legally sufficient “based upon the court’s determination that malfeasance … just means a commission of an unlawful act” for the purposes of committing the crime of indecent exposure. The court explained that the recall should move forward because the voters are the ultimate fact finders and must determine whether Lauser’s conduct amounts to an open and obscene exposure in violation of RCW 9A.88.010….

[4.] The court concluded that this was an inadequate allegation to justify a recall under Washington law:

The court’s role in the recall process is limited. The court “shall not consider the truth of the charges, but only their sufficiency.” But courts do act as a gatekeeper to determine whether the charges are both factually and legally sufficient to support the recall. This is to ensure the recall process is not used to harass public officials or subject them to frivolous charges….

The recall petition is factually insufficient because it does not show Lauser intended to violate the law. Indecent exposure is any intentional “open and obscene exposure … likely to cause reasonable affront or alarm.” Not all exposure is considered obscene. For example, the statute specifically states that breastfeeding is not considered indecent exposure. As stated in the police report, Lauser believed “obscene” related to the topic of “sexual gratification.” She did not believe her exposure violated the law because it was an act of protest, which she did not believe was “obscene.” Therefore, even if Lauser violated the law—and there is a strong argument she did not—it was not intentional. Rather, Lauser had a good faith belief that her conduct was lawful. This is well documented in the police report and Fitzgerald presents no facts to establish otherwise.

The recall petition is legally insufficient because it does not state with specificity facts to allege Lauser’s conduct clearly violates RCW 9A.88.010. Our case law indicates that “obscene exposure” is a legal term of art, which relates to “‘a lascivious exhibition of those private parts of the person which instinctive modesty, human decency, or common propriety require shall be customarily kept covered in the presence of others.'” Thus, indecent exposure is not mere nudity. It requires some underlying “lascivious” or sexual motivation to make it obscene. Here, Lauser was engaged in political protest on a day designated to celebrate transgender people. There was nothing lascivious about her conduct. Our case law is contrary to the superior court’s statement that the voters should determine whether Lauser’s conduct is “obscene” because “obscene exposure” is a legally defined term….

The charge that Lauser violated her oath of office is also factually and legally insufficient. A violation of oath of office means the “neglect or knowing failure by an elective public officer to perform faithfully a duty imposed by law.” There is no factual basis on which Lauser violated a duty imposed by law. The petition merely alleges that by committing indecent exposure, Lauser committed malfeasance and violated her oath of office because she swore an oath to follow the law.

Further, Lauser was not acting in her official capacity during the protest at issue. She acted as a private citizen engaged in her right to protest. Because there is no relationship between Lauser’s legal duties as a city council member and her participation in the protest, the charge of violation of oath of office is factually and legally insufficient….

[5.] And the court then added that Lauser’s content wasn’t just legal but constitutionally protected:

Both our state and the federal constitutions protect nude expression [citing O’Day v. King County (1988), a case that had dealt with nude entertainment “in public places of amusement,” and not out on the street -EV]…. Because Lauser was engaged in expressive conduct, the statute should be construed to restrict only unprotected nude conduct to avoid a constitutional problem. “Protected expression” is conduct that (1) conveys a particularized message, and (2) the surrounding circumstances create a great likelihood that the message would be understood by those who viewed it. Here, Lauser’s expressive conduct is constitutionally protected because she conveyed a particular message—protesting discrimination against transgender people—on an international day designated for that message. These surrounding circumstances create a great likelihood that her message would be understood.

The logic applies not just to nude display of breasts, but to nudity more generally as well. For a contrary view, see, e.g., Tagami v. City of Chicago (7th Cir. 2017) and Taub v. City & County of San Francisco (9th Cir. 2017) (not binding precedent).

[6.] For more on the question whether “laws prohibiting women, but not men, from exposing their breasts” violate the Equal Protection Clause because they discriminate based on sex, see here.

[7.] There’s more interesting material in the separate opinions, available here.

Adrien G. Leavitt and La Rond Baker (ACLU of Washington) represent Lauser.

The post First Amendment Protects Right to Use Nudity as Protest (There, a Pro-Trans Protest) in Public appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/Q5hW4Pf
via IFTTT

Free Speech Claim by Government Employee Fired for Posts Complaining About 2020 St. Louis Riots Can Go Forward

From Winterbauer v. City of St. Louis, decided yesterday by Judge Maria Lanahan (E.D. Mo.):

Christina Winterbauer was a civilian employee of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Division, Department of Public Safety where she worked as a dispatcher. During the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests, Winterbauer made a private Facebook post commentating on the situation in St. Louis. The post read:

And so it begins! Got a call yesterday on my day off, was told when I go back to work Tuesday, we will be on Mandatory 12 hours shifts, All because a bunch of Animals don’t know when enough is enough!! This is my 3rd time working through Protesting & Riots since Ferguson 6 years ago!! I’m tired of my life being turned upside down, my work schedule changing (not by my choice), plans I had made changing, because these Mofo’s are out of control! I suffer from anxiety & it has been really bad since all this protesting started here, worrying about our Officer’s & my Co-Worker’s getting to & from work safety! I’m afraid to drive to work due to not knowing if I’m going to run into a protest or being shot at because I’m white, yes they are targeting us white people because of the color of our skin! With that being said, to all of you supporters of this Crime, Looting & Destruction going on in our City & others, I hope you’re happy with it all & screw you as well, now I’m angry because once again my life is now effected from this shit! This is how I feel about all of it so if you don’t like it, too bad, press the unfriend button, because I promise you I will not lose sleep over it!!

I ask you to pray for all of us First Responders through this, that we all make it to work safely & back home to our families safely! Pray for this madness to end, watch your backs, be aware or your surroundings, because this is some scary shit going on out on the streets!

God Bless us all!!!

The post was subsequently shared with local media by an anonymous third party. Winterbauer alleges that there was no internal backlash to her post, and that it did not disrupt the department. In response to the post, the Department terminated Winterbauer.

Winterbauer sued, and the court allowed her claim to go forward:

“Under Eighth Circuit precedent, we must proceed through a multi-step analysis to determine if [a plaintiff’s] non-testimonial speech is entitled to First Amendment protection. First, we must ‘determin[e] whether the employee spoke as a citizen on a matter of public concern.'” “If the answer is yes, then the possibility of a First Amendment claim arises.” “Once the possibility of a First Amendment claim arises, the next question is whether Defendants have produced evidence to indicate the speech had an adverse impact on the efficiency of the employer’s operations.” “Where there is no evidence of disruption, resort to the Pickering factors is unnecessary because there are no government interests in efficiency to weigh against First Amendment interests.” “Finally, ‘if such an adverse impact is found, the court engages in the Pickering balancing inquiry.'” …

[1.] Winterbauer spoke as a private citizen on a matter of public concern.

It is undisputed that Winterbauer spoke as a private citizen rather than as a representative of the Department. The City contends that Winterbauer was speaking about her personal life rather than addressing a matter of public concern. “When the speech in question involves a matter of political, social or other concern to the community it is of public concern. Whether an employee’s speech addresses a matter of public concern must be determined by the content, form, and context of a given statement.”

The content of the speech concerns the impact of “the [then] ongoing civil unrest, protests, and riots following the death of George Floyd” on the City of St. Louis. While elements of the speech were personal (e.g., expressing her fear of being murdered by rioters and her displeasure at working long shifts to mitigate the damage caused by riots), these elements are examples of how a wider issue of public concern was impacting her as a member of the community. It would be absurd to hold that criticism of violent riots in a community does not address a matter of public concern.

This finding is supported by the context of the post. The Eighth Circuit ruled in Bresnahan v. City of St. Peters (8th Cir. 2023) that “[a]t the time Bresnahan sent the video, BLM protests were the subject of legitimate news interest; that is, a subject of general interest and of value and concern to the public.” So too here. The overall purpose of Winterbauer’s post was to criticize the violence perpetrated by the Black Lives Matter movement, which is and was a matter of public concern.

[2.] The complaint does not allege facts which indicate that the speech had an adverse effect on efficiency.

Considering the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the speech did not have an adverse effect on efficiency. Courts look to see if the speech “created workplace disharmony, impeded [ ] performance, … impaired working relationships, or otherwise had an adverse impact on the efficiency of the [governmental department’s] operations.” Here, Winterbauer alleges that, to her knowledge, the comments did not cause dissent or displeasure among her coworkers. She further alleges that the comments did not disrupt the workflow within the department, have an adverse effect on working relationships, or negatively impact the ability of her, or her colleagues, to perform their duties.

Rather, any displeasure at the comments was external to the department and arose only because a third party transmitted the speech to a broader audience than Winterbauer intended. Outsider complaints on their own (i.e., without a showing as to how they affected the government’s ability to deliver public services) are insufficient to meet the adverse effect factor. See Melton v. City of Forrest City (8th Cir. 2025). Taking the allegations in the complaint as true, we can end our inquiry here….

Peter O. Bruntrager (Bruntrager & Billings, P.C.) represents plaintiff.

The post Free Speech Claim by Government Employee Fired for Posts Complaining About 2020 St. Louis Riots Can Go Forward appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/5xUqWMP
via IFTTT

First Amendment Protects Right to Use Nudity as Protest (There, a Pro-Trans Protest) in Public

[1.] Some states and municipalities public nudity generally, but some, like Washington, ban only nudity that is “lascivious,” which is to say involving some sexual motivation (to oversimplify somewhat).

Does the First Amendment permit such bans when applied to expressive nudity? You can read the badly fractured decision of the Court in Barnes v. Glen Threatre, Inc. (1991) for yourselves and figure out what it means as a precedent. Five Justices voted to uphold a total ban on public nudity, even as to places where only consenting adults are present (such as strip clubs). But Justice Souter, whose vote was necessary to that result, stressed that nude dancing could be banned to prevent “secondary effects” such as “prostitution, sexual assault, and other criminal activity.” It’s not clear then how that holding would apply to cases where the nudity is not sexual and is unlikely to yield such effects.

[2.] Nudity and recalls of elected officials, together! Under Washington law, executive officials can be recalled if enough voters petition, and then if a majority of voters so vote. But there has to be some allegation of “some act or acts of malfeasance or misfeasance while in office, or … violat[ion of] his oath of office,” and courts can reject recall grounds if they don’t adequately allege such misconduct.

It’s not like a normally scheduled election, where voters can throw the bums out for any reason they want. But it’s also not like an impeachment process, which is supposed to involve a trial before legislators who decide whether an official’s actions fit within the category of “high crimes and misdemeanors.” Different states have different rules on the subject (see this 2021 post).

[3.] With that in mind, here are the facts from In the Matter of Recall of Lauser, decided yesterday by the Washington Supreme Court (majority opinion by Justice Charles Johnson):

On March 31, 2025, International Transgender Day of Visibility, Stevenson City Councilmember Lucy Lauser was protesting with a group of demonstrators outside Skamania County Courthouse. As part of the protest, Lauser exposed her breasts with the words “MY BODY IS NOT A SIN” written on her chest. She was approached by police officers who spoke with her regarding RCW 9A.88.010 (indecent exposure). Lauser advised she was expressing her First Amendment right and declined to cover her breasts. She was not arrested or charged.

City Councilmember Lauser is a transgender woman who was elected to Stevenson City Council in 2023. She is the first openly transgender person to serve in elected office in Stevenson. International Transgender Day of Visibility is an annual event dedicated to celebrating transgender people and raising awareness of discrimination faced by transgender people.

Respondent Kathleen Fitzgerald, a Stevenson resident, brought this recall petition to Skamania County Superior Court, alleging that Lauser has not honored her oath of office, which amounts to malfeasance and justifies a recall. Fitzgerald alleged that Lauser committed malfeasance by violating RCW 9A.88.010.

The Skamania County Superior Court found the recall charge factually and legally sufficient “based upon the court’s determination that malfeasance … just means a commission of an unlawful act” for the purposes of committing the crime of indecent exposure. The court explained that the recall should move forward because the voters are the ultimate fact finders and must determine whether Lauser’s conduct amounts to an open and obscene exposure in violation of RCW 9A.88.010….

[4.] The court concluded that this was an inadequate allegation to justify a recall under Washington law:

The court’s role in the recall process is limited. The court “shall not consider the truth of the charges, but only their sufficiency.” But courts do act as a gatekeeper to determine whether the charges are both factually and legally sufficient to support the recall. This is to ensure the recall process is not used to harass public officials or subject them to frivolous charges….

The recall petition is factually insufficient because it does not show Lauser intended to violate the law. Indecent exposure is any intentional “open and obscene exposure … likely to cause reasonable affront or alarm.” Not all exposure is considered obscene. For example, the statute specifically states that breastfeeding is not considered indecent exposure. As stated in the police report, Lauser believed “obscene” related to the topic of “sexual gratification.” She did not believe her exposure violated the law because it was an act of protest, which she did not believe was “obscene.” Therefore, even if Lauser violated the law—and there is a strong argument she did not—it was not intentional. Rather, Lauser had a good faith belief that her conduct was lawful. This is well documented in the police report and Fitzgerald presents no facts to establish otherwise.

The recall petition is legally insufficient because it does not state with specificity facts to allege Lauser’s conduct clearly violates RCW 9A.88.010. Our case law indicates that “obscene exposure” is a legal term of art, which relates to “‘a lascivious exhibition of those private parts of the person which instinctive modesty, human decency, or common propriety require shall be customarily kept covered in the presence of others.'” Thus, indecent exposure is not mere nudity. It requires some underlying “lascivious” or sexual motivation to make it obscene. Here, Lauser was engaged in political protest on a day designated to celebrate transgender people. There was nothing lascivious about her conduct. Our case law is contrary to the superior court’s statement that the voters should determine whether Lauser’s conduct is “obscene” because “obscene exposure” is a legally defined term….

The charge that Lauser violated her oath of office is also factually and legally insufficient. A violation of oath of office means the “neglect or knowing failure by an elective public officer to perform faithfully a duty imposed by law.” There is no factual basis on which Lauser violated a duty imposed by law. The petition merely alleges that by committing indecent exposure, Lauser committed malfeasance and violated her oath of office because she swore an oath to follow the law.

Further, Lauser was not acting in her official capacity during the protest at issue. She acted as a private citizen engaged in her right to protest. Because there is no relationship between Lauser’s legal duties as a city council member and her participation in the protest, the charge of violation of oath of office is factually and legally insufficient….

[5.] And the court then added that Lauser’s content wasn’t just legal but constitutionally protected:

Both our state and the federal constitutions protect nude expression [citing O’Day v. King County (1988), a case that had dealt with nude entertainment “in public places of amusement,” and not out on the street -EV]…. Because Lauser was engaged in expressive conduct, the statute should be construed to restrict only unprotected nude conduct to avoid a constitutional problem. “Protected expression” is conduct that (1) conveys a particularized message, and (2) the surrounding circumstances create a great likelihood that the message would be understood by those who viewed it. Here, Lauser’s expressive conduct is constitutionally protected because she conveyed a particular message—protesting discrimination against transgender people—on an international day designated for that message. These surrounding circumstances create a great likelihood that her message would be understood.

The logic applies not just to nude display of breasts, but to nudity more generally as well. For a contrary view, see, e.g., Tagami v. City of Chicago (7th Cir. 2017) and Taub v. City & County of San Francisco (9th Cir. 2017) (not binding precedent).

[6.] For more on the question whether “laws prohibiting women, but not men, from exposing their breasts” violate the Equal Protection Clause because they discriminate based on sex, see here.

[7.] There’s more interesting material in the separate opinions, available here.

Adrien G. Leavitt and La Rond Baker (ACLU of Washington) represent Lauser.

The post First Amendment Protects Right to Use Nudity as Protest (There, a Pro-Trans Protest) in Public appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/Q5hW4Pf
via IFTTT

Futures Slide As Renewed AI Disruption And Private Credit Fears Spark Selling

Futures Slide As Renewed AI Disruption And Private Credit Fears Spark Selling

The rollercoaster continues: US equity futures are in the red again, trading near session lows, and set to extend Thursday’s losses with as stocks underperform after yesterday’s spectacular plunge in the momentum trade as NVDA’s post record-breaking earnings/guidance plunge spooked markets that nothing is resolved about where AI goes next. As of 8:00am ET, S&P futures were down 0.6%, and set for a monthly loss after a whirlwind February marked by twin fears of a bubble in the AI trade and of the technology’s disruptive power. Nasdaq futures dropped 0.7%. In the latest AI contradiction, CoreWeave plunged 12% after data center operator reported a bigger-than-expected loss and higher capex fueling concern about overspending on infrastructure. But in a mirror image, Dell is 12% higher after its outlook for sales of AI servers exceeded estimates, a sign of robust demand for machines helping fuel the AI data center build-out. 10-year Treasury yields slid below 4%, while the USD is flat. Commodities are mixed, with Energy higher and Metals mixed (Silver outperforming vs Gold flat). Today’s macro data focus is on PPI and Construction Spending.

In premarket trading Mag 7 stocks are mixed: Nvidia is up 0.4% after sliding Thursday, other names are mostly lower (Alphabet little changed, Tesla -0.2%, Amazon -0.5%, Apple -0.5%, Meta Platforms -0.5%, Microsoft -0.8%). 

  • Block (XYZ) rallies 18% after the financial technology company said it was reducing its workforce by nearly half in a bet on AI. Jack Dorsey’s firm also raised its full-year outlook for gross profit, which was already above the average analyst estimate.
  • CoreWeave (CRWV) slides 12% after the AI infrastructure software company reported a bigger-than-expected loss and boosted capital expenditures, spurring concerns about the company overspending on infrastructure.
  • Flutter (FLUT) is down 15% after the gambling company reported fourth-quarter results that fell short of Wall Street estimates. Guidance for 2026 was worse than expected, according to analysts, who pointed to increasing competitive pressures in the US sports-betting market as a key concern.
  • NCR Atleos (NATL) jumps 16% as The Brink’s Company said it will acquire the company in a cash and stock deal valued at about $6.6 billion.
  • Netflix (NFLX) is up 8% after the streaming giant dropped out of the fight to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, effectively ending the bidding war for the Hollywood studio.
  • Zscaler (ZS) is down 9% after the security software company’s second-quarter results weren’t seen as strong enough to reverse recent negative sentiment toward software companies.

In other corporate news, Netflix rose more than 7% after dropping out of the bidding for Warner Bros. Dell Technologies surged 11% following a strong sales forecast for its AI servers. 

Nvidia suffered its worst day since April on Thursday, with the price action suggesting the world’s most valuable company is no longer being rewarded for spectacular results and remarkable guidance.

NVDA’s plunge happens as the disruptive potential of AI has rattled US equities for weeks in what traders have dubbed the “AI scare trade.” The technology’s bellwethers have also lost momentum after powering S&P 500 gains for years, prompting investors to rotate into markets abroad and companies tied to broader economic growth.

“The outperformance highlights the possibility of a lingering overvaluation in some asset classes in the US, as well as doubts about the independence of the Federal Reserve’s future monetary policy,” said Guillermo Hernandez Sampere, head of trading at asset manager MPPM. “Barring an economic downturn in Europe, the outperformance should continue.”

“The outperformance highlights the possibility of a lingering overvaluation in some asset classes in the US, as well as doubts about the independence of the Federal Reserve’s future monetary policy,” said Guillermo Hernandez Sampere, head of trading at asset manager MPPM. “Barring an economic downturn in Europe, the outperformance should continue.”

As Wall Street tries to assess likely job losses at the hands of AI, Jack Dorsey’s financial technology firm Block is cutting 4,000 employees, nearly half its workforce, in a bet on AI changing the future of labor productivity. Then again, considering that Elon Musk fired 80% of Dorsey’s last company before ChatGPT was even out – and it thrived – or that Block spent $68 million on a party a few months before the mass layoffs, suggests that the culprit here is bloat and terrible management, and not AI.

The market’s unease about private credit persists. In an rerun of the collapse of First Brands, a spectacular new private credit blowup in London has Wall Street chasing billions. And a private credit fund overseen by Apollo Global Management cut its dividend and marked down the value of its assets amid signs of strain in parts of its loan book.

Elsewhere, Anthropic, the AI start-up that has wiped billions off the market value of US stocks, remains in focus. US lawmakers, flummoxed by the Pentagon’s negotiating tactics, are warning that carrying out those threats would have significant consequences for the military ecosystem. Meanwhile, investment-grade bond markets, which had emerged as a safe haven during recent AI-driven swings in equities, are starting to show signs of strain.  

US stocks saw inflows of $2.2 billion in the week ended Feb. 25, according to BofA citing EPFR Global data. Strategists led by Michael Hartnett see international stocks outperforming US for the rest of this decade. 

“I don’t see any major correction coming, but any hint of a recession linked to AI in the US would certainly trigger some unpleasant trading,” said Andrea Tueni, head of sales trading at Saxo Banque France. “Europe is currently better positioned than the US and outperforming as its tech sector is much smaller and there is much less uncertainty on monetary policy.”

Earnings season wraps up next week, and has so far been somewhat disappointing, with the fewest S&P 500 companies beating estimates since 2022. Of the 481 to have reported so far, 73.4% have beaten forecasts, while nearly 22% have missed. No major US companies are expected to report on Friday, but Berkshire Hathaway’s annual report is due on Saturday, including Greg Abel’s first annual letter to shareholders on performance since taking over as CEO from Warren Buffett.

Europe’s Stoxx 600 was on track for an eighth straight monthly advance, its longest such streak in more than a decade; telecommunications and mining stocks lead gains, while travel and consumer products shares edged lower. Here are the biggest movers Friday:

  • Deutsche Telekom shares rally while Vodafone dips following an El Español report that Telefonica is in talks over a potential acquisition of 1&1 in Germany
  • Prysmian shares reverse earlier losses to trade as much as 2.3% higher following 4Q results from the Italian cable make
  • Holcim gains as much as 1.5% after the French building materials firm reported fourth-quarter earnings that were slightly ahead of expectations and an outlook that is unlikely to trigger any major revisions to estimates, according to analysts
  • Clariane shares jump 17%, the most since June, as analysts highlight improving margins and cost-saving initiatives at the French nursing home operator
  • Saint-Gobain shares fall as much as 3.2%, the most since Jan. 13, after the French construction materials producer reported fourth-quarter results. Jefferies noted that like-for-like sales in the period trailed expectations
  • Melrose Industries plunges as much as 16%, the biggest drop in almost a year, after earnings guidance from the aerospace business fell short of expectations, overshadowing a profit and cashflow beat delivered in 2025
  • BASF shares fall as much as 5.4%, after the German chemicals company’s full-year results disappointed analysts, who expect consensus downgrades, even though a January pre-release had already revealed price and currency woes at the company
  • Grifols shares declined as much as 8.3%, the most since April, after the Spanish company’s adjusted Ebitda for the fourth quarter missed estimates and it issued guidance that analysts say fell short of expectations
  • Valeo falls as much as 4.9% following its results, despite guidance implying upgrades to consensus free cash expectations, after this metric also surprised to the upside in the second half of the year. Net income was, however, impacted by higher tax
  • Wizz Air shares slid as much as 10%, the most since July, after shareholder Indigo Partners offered 10 million shares priced at £12.50, a discount of 6.4% to Thursday’s closing price
  • Fugro shares fall as much as 12%, the most since September, after the Dutch geological data company saw its year-over-year adjusted Ebit plunge by 92% in what Jefferies says was a “challenging winter season”

Asian stocks traded mixed, with a key regional benchmark on track to close its best February on record as investors snapped up shares of the region’s AI infrastructure companies. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index gain as much as 0.6% Friday. South Korea’s Kospi fell 1%, as chipmakers Samsung and SK Hynix fell. Key gauges rose in Japan and Hong Kong, while Taiwan’s market was closed for a holiday. Asian stocks have been outperforming global peers, with the region’s hardware firms seen as beneficiaries of the AI buildout even as concerns grow over spending levels and business disruption. The MSCI regional gauge is up 6.7% this month, poised for the best February since it started trading in 1998. Chinese technology stocks in Hong Kong capped their worst month in two years, weighed by weak earnings and a lack of buying by mainland investors. Sentiment toward China’s Internet giants has cooled amid concerns over valuations and rising competition that’s eroding corporate bottom line. Meanwhile, global investors offloaded nearly $5 billion of South Korean equities on Friday, in a sign of profit taking after the equity benchmark rallied nearly 50% this year. The index rose past the 6,000 threshold this week, just a month after surpassing President Lee Jae Myung’s political goal of 5,000.

In FX, the dollar was set for a fourth straight monthly loss. The Norwegian Krone led G10 currencies with a +0.54% rise. The pound fell slightly against the dollar after a special election in the UK laid bare the unpopularity of Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government.

In rates, treasuries extended gains, with the 10-year note on track for its best month in a year after yields have tumbled 26 basis points in February to 3.98%. Outperformance by front-end and belly steepened 2s10s spread by about 1bp, 5s30s by about 1.5bp. 10-year gilts and bunds are slightly cheaper vs US benchmark

In commodities, oil rose again, after sliding on Thursday. Gold traded flat, with prices headed for a seventh consecutive monthly advance.

The cross-asset moves reflect sustained demand for havens amid policy uncertainty from the Trump administration, tensions in the Middle East and questions about the strength of US economic growth. Swap traders added to bets on Federal Reserve interest-rate cuts, with a July move again almost fully priced after being briefly scaled back earlier this week.

US economic data slate includes January PPI (8:30am), February MNI Chicago PMI (9:45am, several minutes earlier for subscribers), December construction spending (10am) and February Kansas City Fed services activity (11am). No Fed speakers are scheduled. Bloomberg Economics expects producer price inflation, which shows price trends before they reach consumers and feeds into the Fed’s preferred gauge of inflation, the personal consumption expenditures index, to have slowed to 0.2% in January from 0.5%. Potentially, that could bolster the case for further rate cuts.

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 mini -0.3%
  • Nasdaq 100 mini -0.3%
  • Russell 2000 mini -0.8%
  • Stoxx Europe 600 +0.2%
  • DAX +0.2%
  • CAC 40 -0.1%
  • 10-year Treasury yield -1 basis point at 3.99%
  • VIX +1.1 points at 19.74
  • Bloomberg Dollar Index little changed at 1188.36
  • euro little changed at $1.1801
  • WTI crude +1.8% at $66.38/barrel

Top Overnight News

  • The United States and Iran made progress in talks over Tehran’s nuclear program on Thursday, mediator Oman said, but hours of negotiation ended with no sign of a breakthrough that could avert potential U.S. strikes amid a massive military buildup. RTRS
  • Vice President JD Vance said Thursday that while military strikes against Iran remain under consideration by President Donald Trump, there is “no chance” that such strikes would result in the United States becoming involved in a years-long, drawn-out war. WSJ
  • Anthropic rejected the Pentagon proposal to settle a dispute over terms for military use of its AI software. BBG
  • A long-running conflict between Pakistan and Afghanistan’s Taliban regime has turned into what Pakistan declared Friday to be “open war,” with attacks reported in Kabul and along the neighbors’ shared border. WSJ
  • China announced it would remove a reserve requirement for forward contracts selling the yuan in a move aimed at cooling the currency’s advance. The yuan snapped its longest winning streak since 2010. Still, options traders are betting on a stronger yuan. FT, BBG
  • Inflation in Japan’s capital cooled below the central bank’s 2% target for the first time in over a year, but the slowdown is unlikely to derail further interest rate hikes. WSJ
  • Mizuho Financial Group Inc. is planning to replace about 5,000 administrative jobs in Japan with artificial intelligence over the next 10 years, as the country’s third-largest lender tries to boost productivity. BBG
  • The pound fell to its lowest level against the euro in more than two months as the Greens won a by-election in Manchester and Reform UK received the second-highest number of votes. The result underscored the threats facing PM Keir Starmer. BBG
  • Netflix shares jumped premarket (NFLX +740bps premkt) after it dropped its bid for Warner Bros., clearing the way for Paramount’s $111 billion deal. The decision allows the streamer to focus on buybacks and its “build vs. buy” strategy. BBG
  • IG bond markets are showing signs of stress, with spreads widening as investors grow wary of default risks in the software sector and pressure in private credit. Risk premiums, however, remain below long-term averages. BBG

Trade/Tariffs

  • China’s MOFCOM announces adjustments to anti-discrimination measures against Canada effective Mar 1st till Dec 31st 2026, will not impose relevant tariffs on some imports from China.
  • Japan’s PM Takaichi said US needs to honour its commitments on tariffs.

A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

APAC stocks were ultimately higher heading into month-end but with price action choppy following the weak handover from the US, where sentiment was clouded by tech weakness, while participants also digested the recent US-Iran talks in Geneva. ASX 200 mildly gained as strength in tech and telecoms atoned for the losses in financials and consumer stocks. Nikkei 225 traded indecisively amid a firmer currency and a slew of mixed data releases from Japan, in which Industrial Production disappointed, Retail Sales topped forecasts, and Tokyo CPI printed firmer-than-expected but slowed across the board with the Core reading falling beneath the central bank’s 2% price target for the first time since October 2024. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp were varied with outperformance in Hong Kong as participants digested earnings releases from the likes of Baidu and Sun Hung Kai Properties, while the mainland initially lacked direction in the absence of fresh catalysts and ahead of next week’s annual “two sessions”, while Trump-Xi summit preparations were said to falter. However, late upside was seen after comments from China’s Politburo meeting in which it stated that China’s development process during the 14th Five-Year Plan is extraordinary and that it is necessary to continue to implement a more active fiscal policy and a moderately loose monetary policy.Top Asian News

Top Asian News

  • China Politburo held a meeting on Friday and noted that China’s development process during the 14th Five-Year Plan is extremely unusual and extraordinary. Said that it is necessary to continue to implement a more active fiscal policy and a moderately loose monetary policy. Necessary to focus on building a strong domestic market and step up the cultivation and expansion of new growth momentum.

European bourses (STOXX 600 +0.3%) are broadly firmer, with the SMI (+0.7%) the clear outperformer after Swiss Re (+3.6%) posted a 47% Y/Y rise in 2025 net profit while announcing a USD 500mln share buyback. Lagging behind its peers is the CAC 40 (-0.1%), with very company-specific news to drive the index. European sectors are mixed. Telecommunications (+1.3%) outperform after Spain’s Cellnex (+0.6%) saw 2025 operating profit rise more  than double annually and Telefonica (+3.7%) reportedly negotiating the purchase of 1&1 (+9.4%)in Germany in a EUR 5bln deal. On the flip side, Travel and Leisure (-1.8%) is underperforming despite positive IAG (-5.5%) earnings, in which the Co. beat FY profit expectations and announced a EUR 1.5bln share buyback.

Top European News

  • UK former Deputy PM Rayner noted the Gorton and Denton by-election results are a “wake up call” and Labour “has to be braver”; Sky News suggests these remarks will be taken as a direct aim at UK PM Starmer and his leadership.
  • EU Commission eyes a legal loophole to bypass Hungary’s veto of a EUR 90bln euro loan, according to FT.
  • UK Green Party wins parliamentary seat in Gorton and Denton, defeating UK PM Starmer’s Labour in the by-election.

FX

  • DXY is choppy but ultimately slightly softer following subdued APAC trade amid mixed sentiment, whilst the tone in Europe is tentative. Modest downticks in the index were seen as the EUR strengthened following the hotter-than-expected French CPI data (more below). Aside from that, newsflow in the European morning has been on the quieter side as USD traders gear up for US PPI data later in the session. DXY resides in a current 97.611-97.824 range at the time of writing, within Thursday’s 97.489-97.984 parameter.
  • EUR/USD eked mild gains after oscillating around the 1.1800 focal point overnight, with a more convincing move above the level seen after the hotter-than-expected French and Spanish Prelim CPI metrics. EUR/USD resides in a 1.1789-1.1822 range awaiting the German Prelim CPI later today. The single currency then slipped to the unchanged mark after German state CPI metrics, where the Y/Y metrics generally showed a bit more cooling than what is forecasted for the mainland.
  • GBP/USD languished near the 1.3500 level following the prior day’s underperformance owing to credit concerns, and with overnight price action contained after UK GfK consumer confidence fell to its lowest level that was last seen in November. Overnight, UK journalists focused on the Gorton and Denton by-elections in which the Green party won, with Reform second and Labour third. With Labour losing a seat they held for almost 100 years, UK PM Starmer’s leadership could be at risk. Nonetheless, GBP/USD saw little reaction to the results announcement, and currently resides in a 1.3461-1.3507 range, after finding support at its 200 DMA (1.3442) yesterday. Ahead, BoE’s Chief Economist Pill is due to give some remarks.
  • USD/JPY retreated amid the early subdued risk appetite and following a slew of data, including Tokyo CPI, which printed firmer-than-expected across the board, but slowed from the previous with Core inflation back beneath the BoJ’s price goal. The pair pared back some losses as the DXY recouped some overnight losses. USD/JPY trades in a 155.54-156.12 range vs yesterday’s 155.70-156.43 parameter.
  • Antipodeans rebounded from the prior day’s trough and narrowly outperform in the European morning, but with further upside contained by the mixed risk appetite and amid a weaker CNH, which was pressured after the PBoC actions to slow currency appreciation, in which it cut the FX risk reserve ratio to 0% and set a weaker-than-expected CNY fix by maintaining it at the prior day’s level.

Fixed Income

  • USTs are firmer by a handful of ticks this morning, and trades within a 113-16 to 113-19 range. Really not much driving things for the US paper this morning, and remains towards the prior day’s peaks. The upside in USTs on Thursday was facilitated by subdued risk appetite and a decent 7yr auction. Focus remains on the geopolitical situation, following US-Iran talks. Meetings have concluded, and whilst there have reportedly been some positive developments, uncertainty remains. Reports suggest that US President Trump is expected to convene senior advisers on Friday for detailed discussions on Iran and to decide on a course of action toward Tehran. Internal deliberations are said to be focused not on whether a strike would occur but on its scope and potential targets. Next up, US PPI.
  • Bunds are incrementally firmer/flat, and currently reside within a 129.76 to 129.99 range. Initially held towards recent highs, but has since slipped towards the unchanged mark following the hotter-than-expected French/Spanish inflation metrics. Though the German State CPIs thereafter spurred some modest upticks in Bunds, given the Y/Y metrics generally showed a bit more cooling than what is forecasted for the mainland.
  • Gilts are firmer by around 10 ticks, to currently trade near the upper end of a 93.00-93.30 range. Overnight, UK journalists focused on the Gorton and Denton by-elections in which the Green party won, with Reform second and Labour third. With Labour losing a seat they held for almost 100 years, UK PM Starmer’s leadership could be at risk – which in theory would place pressure on UK-assets. This has not been reflected in price action this morning, though analysts at GS opined that the risk had already been priced in by markets.
  • Japan sold JPY 2.15tln in 2-year JGBs; b/c 3.32x (prev. 3.88x); average yield 1.244% (prev. 1.253%).
  • Australia sold AUD 800mln 2.75% November 2028 bonds, b/c 3.86, avg. yield 4.1849%.

Commodities

  • WTI Apr’26 and Brent May’26 futures are firmer within USD 64.85-65.90/bbl and USD 70.42-71.49/bbl intraday ranges thus far, respectively. Gains follow yesterday’s US-Iran negotiations, which ultimately failed to reach an accord, but the sides agreed to continue technical talks. Mediators reported “unprecedented openness to new and creative ideas”. Both sides reportedly moved closer on specific elements of an agreement related to nuclear limits and sanctions relief. That being said, major sticking points remain.
  • Spot gold trades within a narrow range after only modestly gaining on yesterday’s US-Iran saga, which ended in no deal, but talks are poised to continue next week. Traders will be focused on any potential US military action this weekend in a bid to pressure Iran. Spot gold resides tight USD 5,167-5,200.64/oz range at the time of writing. Spot silver is firmer by some 1.5% intraday but contained to within Wednesday’s ranges.
  • Base metals are firmer across the board despite the choppy risk tone in Asia, but prices are underpinned by the softer USD. Some desks attribute the rise to the stalled US-Iran talks and strengthening demand signals from China. The upside also comes ahead of next week’s China “Two Sessions”, where formal approval of the 15th Five-Year Plan and new stimulus measures for infrastructure and technology (AI, EVs, grid networks) are anticipated. 3M LME copper resides in a USD 13,243.73-13,508.13/t.
  • London Metal Exchange announces the consultation for introducing regulatory position limits, exemptions and position management controls.
  • Iron ore port stockpiles hit record levels in China as mines continue to add supply.
  • Abu Dhabi reportedly offers more oil to partners, heading into the OPEC+ meeting, Bloomberg sources say.
  • India is reportedly looking to cut coal imports for power plants at least 30% this year, sources say.
  • China SHFE warehouses weekly changes: Copper +43.7%, Aluminium +19.7%, Zinc +44.9%.
  • A local ceasefire has been established near the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, TASS reported. Further by RIA stating one power line is being repaired at the power plant.

Geopolitics: Middle East

  • US authorises the departure of some embassy personnel and families from Israel amid safety risks.
  • Iran urges US to abandon “excessive demands” to reach deal, Sky News Arabia reported citing AFP.
  • Iranian spokesperson said “In the event of any conflict, American soldiers and their equipment will be destroyed, and all US resources and interests in the region will be within the range of Iranian forces”, via Iran International.
  • Top Middle East commander briefed US President Trump on military options on Iran, according to ABC News.
  • US VP Vance said negotiations depend on what the Iranians do and there is no chance that any potential strikes on Iran will result in engaging in a war for years.
  • US President Trump is expected to convene senior advisers on Friday for detailed discussions on Iran and to decide on a course of action toward Tehran, according to Israel Hayom citing US officials. Internal deliberations are said to be focused not on whether a strike would occur but on its scope and potential targets, while options under discussion include nuclear facilities, missile sites, state institutions and infrastructure.
  • Iranian Foreign Minister said further progress has been made in our diplomatic engagement with the US, also said mission of the technical teams is as important as our mission.
  • Oman’s Foreign Minister is scheduled to meet with US VP Vance and other US officials in Washington on Friday.

Geopolitics: Others

  • China said it is not possible to join denuclearisation talks at this stage.
  • AFP reported of clashes near a major border crossing between Afghanistan and Pakistan.
  • Afghan Ministry of Defence said their military operation resulted in casualties among Pakistani forces and came in defence of their territory and people, while it vowed to respond to future attacks.
  • Loud explosion heard in Afghanistan’s capital of Kabul and Pakistani fighter jets are reportedly conducting a raid on Kabul.

US Event Calendar

 

DB’s Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

 

d

Tyler Durden
Fri, 02/27/2026 – 08:30

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/KXNdl0F Tyler Durden

“Torn The Roof Off” British Politics: Starmer Stunned After Green Party Steals Labour Seat

“Torn The Roof Off” British Politics: Starmer Stunned After Green Party Steals Labour Seat

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is under pressure to reinvent his ailing Labour government with a leftwards pivot after the Green Party captured one of its House of Commons seats via a special election.

The result underscores the recent fragmentation of UK politics and the disruption of long-held electoral certainties.

It has “torn the roof off” British politics, said Green Party Leader Zack Polanski.

Spencer’s win marks the first-ever by-election victory for the Greens, as well as their first seat in northern England, highlighting the increasing reach of the left-wing party in a context where Labour voters are abandoning it in both directions.

Spencer’s margin of victory was much more comfortable than commentators had expected, with polls consistently understating the Greens’ appeal.

The swing from Labour was 26% in Gorton and Denton, and the Greens now have five MPs in Parliament.

Andrea Egan, general secretary at workers’ union Unison, said Labour should be “taking the fight” to Reform UK Leader Nigel Farage “rather than letting him set the agenda.”

As Tom Jones reports below for TheCritic.co.uk, the election has grim implications.

The Gorton and Denton by-election, by virtue of having been won by the Greens, marks a more momentous shift for the left than the right. Ava Santina has written about this for us, and a recent Critic Show episode is devoted entirely to the fracturing of the left

But like the overweight kid trying to avoid getting near the ball in PE, just because you don’t win, that doesn’t mean there aren’t lessons to be learned. 

The first is that Reform may need to start thinking about expectation management. As an insurgent party, they were happy to talk up their chances of winning in order to build the narrative that the two main parties are finished. But this made the race seem closer than the result ended up being: 4,000 votes behind the Greens and  just over 1,000 votes ahead of Labour therefore will be made to seem like an underperformance by the media. 

It was not. In terms of the size of the swing needed from the 2024 General Election, Gorton and Denton was 413th on Reform’s target list. Even with their polling shoring up at around 30 per cent, as it is in national polls, turning the sixth Labour seat over was a stretch too far. On the upside, a national campaign against the Greens will be a much more favourable proposition for Reform, coming as it does against a weaker campaigning machine than Labour — and increased scrutiny on the Green Party, which it will fail.

A lesson may also be on the need to find local candidates. I hate that local candidates boost election performances, I hate that Hannah Spencer claimed she had never seen Matt Goodwin in the local Asda “doing his big shop”, but most of all I hate that it works. A local candidate would not have swung Gorton and Denton their way, but there will be a significant number of seats where it will. It’s yet another problem for Reform’s candidate selection team to deal with. 

As for the other right-wing parties, the question is, “why bother?” 

The Conservatives took just 706 votes. 1.9 per cent of the vote. That is their lowest ever vote share in a by-election. They lose their deposit for the first time at an English by election for nearly 40 years.

We have heard much about the need for a Reform-Conservative pact. It has come, overwhelmingly, from establishment media figures whose professional relevance depends on preserving their access to the Conservative Party — and who can see that access, and therefore their own influence, draining away. Such a pact would necessitate the Conservatives to stand aside in hundreds of seats like this. It is so ingrained in the Conservative psyche to stand candidates everywhere that it is part of the party’s constitution. Farage has been burned before with a Conservative pact — it is incumbent on the Conservatives to make any such a deal happen.

The Conservative statement after the result spoke much about this result rendering Starmer a lame duck, but nothing about their failure to play any role in this result being delivered. 

Meanwhile Advance UK, the Ben Habib vehicle, took 154 votes — less than the Monster Raving Loony Party. A vision of Restore Britain’s future? Perhaps. There is a question here. If things are really as bad as the leaders of these parties claim, then how can they justify siphoning off votes from adjacent right-wing parties over ever-finer points of right-wing doctrine? When the house is on fire, it is a strange moment to insist on arguing about the exact brand of extinguisher.

Perhaps parties formed with the sole aim of giving histrionic social media addicts something to do will not be Britain’s salvation. Who knew.

Finally, the lesson that all parties of the right should take is in the dangers of sectarian voting.

For a long time the conventional parties have been happy with sectarian voting, so long as it delivered conventional parties.

The salience of the Muslim vote in this election — coupled with the Green Party’s campaign videos in Urdu and Bangla — has reinforced a narrative that has been gathering force since the rise of the so-called “Gaza independents”: that Britain has a sectarian voting problem that can no longer be ignored. 

It is fast becoming an ingrained part of our political culture: Sky’s coverage of the result included Sam Coates examining and speaking about the proportion of the seat that is ethnic minority.

There is a risk here.

A political class steeped in American news and habits of thought may interpret this development as merely the British version of familiar US-style demographic politics, where politics is more attuned to minute changes amongst identity and interest groups.

It is not. American immigrants, and therefore their voting patterns, are markedly different to those in Britain. We are not getting “suburban moms”.

The Electoral Commission grants Democracy Volunteers access to polling stations during elections, and the group has reported seeing “concerningly high levels” of family voting (an illegal practice in which two voters occupy a single polling booth, often with one directing the other’s vote) in the by-election. 

John Ault, director of Democracy Volunteers, said: “Today we have seen concerningly high levels of family voting in Gorton and Denton. Based on our assessment of today’s observations, we have seen the highest levels of family voting at any election in our 10 year history of observing elections in the UK.”

He added: “We rarely issue a report on the night of an election, but the data we have collected today on family voting, when compared to other recent by-elections, is extremely high. In the other recent Westminster parliamentary by-election in Runcorn and Helsby we saw family voting in 12 per cent of polling stations, affecting 1 per cent of voters. In Gorton and Denton, we observed family voting in 68 per cent of polling stations, affecting 12 per cent of those voters observed.”

Manchester City Council have hit back, arguing that “No such issues have been reported today”, and blaming Democracy Volunteers for not reporting these issues at the time. This issue is too obvious to ignore (although some will try), and at least some parties will find it politically expedient to oppose it. These voting patterns have been documented for a long time. Perhaps, after the next election, we will finally have the chance to deal with them. Small mercies, but mercies nonetheless. 

Angela Rayner, the former deputy prime minister who is bookmakers’ favorite to succeed Starmer, said the result was “a wake-up call.”

Tyler Durden
Fri, 02/27/2026 – 08:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/QRJNyks Tyler Durden

Free Speech Claim by Government Employee Fired for Posts Complaining About 2020 St. Louis Riots Can Go Forward

From Winterbauer v. City of St. Louis, decided yesterday by Judge Maria Lanahan (E.D. Mo.):

Christina Winterbauer was a civilian employee of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Division, Department of Public Safety where she worked as a dispatcher. During the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests, Winterbauer made a private Facebook post commentating on the situation in St. Louis. The post read:

And so it begins! Got a call yesterday on my day off, was told when I go back to work Tuesday, we will be on Mandatory 12 hours shifts, All because a bunch of Animals don’t know when enough is enough!! This is my 3rd time working through Protesting & Riots since Ferguson 6 years ago!! I’m tired of my life being turned upside down, my work schedule changing (not by my choice), plans I had made changing, because these Mofo’s are out of control! I suffer from anxiety & it has been really bad since all this protesting started here, worrying about our Officer’s & my Co-Worker’s getting to & from work safety! I’m afraid to drive to work due to not knowing if I’m going to run into a protest or being shot at because I’m white, yes they are targeting us white people because of the color of our skin! With that being said, to all of you supporters of this Crime, Looting & Destruction going on in our City & others, I hope you’re happy with it all & screw you as well, now I’m angry because once again my life is now effected from this shit! This is how I feel about all of it so if you don’t like it, too bad, press the unfriend button, because I promise you I will not lose sleep over it!!

I ask you to pray for all of us First Responders through this, that we all make it to work safely & back home to our families safely! Pray for this madness to end, watch your backs, be aware or your surroundings, because this is some scary shit going on out on the streets!

God Bless us all!!!

The post was subsequently shared with local media by an anonymous third party. Winterbauer alleges that there was no internal backlash to her post, and that it did not disrupt the department. In response to the post, the Department terminated Winterbauer.

Winterbauer sued, and the court allowed her claim to go forward:

“Under Eighth Circuit precedent, we must proceed through a multi-step analysis to determine if [a plaintiff’s] non-testimonial speech is entitled to First Amendment protection. First, we must ‘determin[e] whether the employee spoke as a citizen on a matter of public concern.'” “If the answer is yes, then the possibility of a First Amendment claim arises.” “Once the possibility of a First Amendment claim arises, the next question is whether Defendants have produced evidence to indicate the speech had an adverse impact on the efficiency of the employer’s operations.” “Where there is no evidence of disruption, resort to the Pickering factors is unnecessary because there are no government interests in efficiency to weigh against First Amendment interests.” “Finally, ‘if such an adverse impact is found, the court engages in the Pickering balancing inquiry.'” …

[1.] Winterbauer spoke as a private citizen on a matter of public concern.

It is undisputed that Winterbauer spoke as a private citizen rather than as a representative of the Department. The City contends that Winterbauer was speaking about her personal life rather than addressing a matter of public concern. “When the speech in question involves a matter of political, social or other concern to the community it is of public concern. Whether an employee’s speech addresses a matter of public concern must be determined by the content, form, and context of a given statement.”

The content of the speech concerns the impact of “the [then] ongoing civil unrest, protests, and riots following the death of George Floyd” on the City of St. Louis. While elements of the speech were personal (e.g., expressing her fear of being murdered by rioters and her displeasure at working long shifts to mitigate the damage caused by riots), these elements are examples of how a wider issue of public concern was impacting her as a member of the community. It would be absurd to hold that criticism of violent riots in a community does not address a matter of public concern.

This finding is supported by the context of the post. The Eighth Circuit ruled in Bresnahan v. City of St. Peters (8th Cir. 2023) that “[a]t the time Bresnahan sent the video, BLM protests were the subject of legitimate news interest; that is, a subject of general interest and of value and concern to the public.” So too here. The overall purpose of Winterbauer’s post was to criticize the violence perpetrated by the Black Lives Matter movement, which is and was a matter of public concern.

[2.] The complaint does not allege facts which indicate that the speech had an adverse effect on efficiency.

Considering the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the speech did not have an adverse effect on efficiency. Courts look to see if the speech “created workplace disharmony, impeded [ ] performance, … impaired working relationships, or otherwise had an adverse impact on the efficiency of the [governmental department’s] operations.” Here, Winterbauer alleges that, to her knowledge, the comments did not cause dissent or displeasure among her coworkers. She further alleges that the comments did not disrupt the workflow within the department, have an adverse effect on working relationships, or negatively impact the ability of her, or her colleagues, to perform their duties.

Rather, any displeasure at the comments was external to the department and arose only because a third party transmitted the speech to a broader audience than Winterbauer intended. Outsider complaints on their own (i.e., without a showing as to how they affected the government’s ability to deliver public services) are insufficient to meet the adverse effect factor. See Melton v. City of Forrest City (8th Cir. 2025). Taking the allegations in the complaint as true, we can end our inquiry here….

Peter O. Bruntrager (Bruntrager & Billings, P.C.) represents plaintiff.

The post Free Speech Claim by Government Employee Fired for Posts Complaining About 2020 St. Louis Riots Can Go Forward appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/5xUqWMP
via IFTTT