FOMC Preview: Dashboards, Dissent, & "Degree-Of-Accommodation" Differences

“More of the same,” should summarize today’s FOMC statement. There will be no press conference or refresh of the ‘dot plot’ economic projections. The Fed is expected to continue to taper by $10 billion with confirmation that the “growth meme” is playing out just as they projected (especially after today’s GDP print). Goldman believes the focus will be on the jobs ‘dashboard’ and recent inflation data enables the dovish Fed to argue recent moves were noise and stay easier for longer. The downside risk (for markets) may be that Fed hawks will likely have little luck in altering the way forward guidance is employed by the Fed (and chatter over a Fisher dissent is possible).

 

RanSquawk’s FOMC PREVIEW

  • Fed expected to taper by USD 10bln again, taking monthly bond buys down to USD 25bln from USD 35bln
  • Yet again, all focus on rate pathway and projections for the first Fed Fund Rate (FFR) hike by Fed officials
  • There will be no press conference from Fed Chair Yellen or release of Summary of Economic Projections alongside the decision

TAPERING: The latest announcement from the Fed which coincides with a slew of key economic data such as an initial estimate of growth in the Q2 and the monthly jobs report release by the BLS is expected to result in the Federal Reserve members agreeing on another USD 10bln taper. Likelihood of a larger USD 15bln taper are rather small, as this would almost inevitably risk resulting in a repeat of the “taper tantrum” price action observed last year.

RATES: The accompanying statement is likely to be tweaked to emphasise not only the pickup in growth, but also the subdued and contained nature of inflation expectations. At the same time, members of the Federal Reserve board will continue to actively look at various price measures including wage inflation and debate on the best method for raising rates. As such, despite a potentially more upbeat statement, Fed hawks will likely have little luck in altering the way forward guidance is employed by the Fed, with Fed Fund Rate futures pricing in the first rate hike in June 2015. There is however a risk as noted by analysts at JP Morgan that changing description of unemployment from “elevated” to “somewhat elevated” would allow for a more gradual pivot toward recognising progress toward full employment mandate and therefore could pose a risk to current projected rates path. No one on the FOMC is expected to dissent this time although there is an outside chance that Fisher could, after recently saying that waiting a “considerable time” for the first rate hike implies too long a wait.

MARKET REACTIONS: Given the expectation of a more upbeat picture on the employment situation, there is a risk that that the decision could be interpreted as slightly more hawkish as the Fed move nearer to full employment. At Yellen’s semi-annual testimony, the Fed chair suggested rates could rise sooner than is currently priced in if the employment situation improves and hence there is a risk of USD strength, downside in Treasuries, steepening of the Eurodollars curve, and downside in equity prices. Conversely if the FOMC continue to state that unemployment remains elevated, then the statement will likely be viewed as more dovish and could weigh on the USD. It is worth noting that due to the close proximity of this decision to the release of US GDP and Nonfarm Payrolls that any market reaction could be relatively muted.

 

Goldman expects very little change to the FOMC statement.

The FOMC might choose to upgrade the language on growth in economic activity somewhat, and it might also strengthen the language on labor market indicators a touch in recognition of the strong June employment report.

 

For the most part, however, recent data have supported the characterization of current conditions in the June statement. In particular, the softer June CPI print likely reinforced the Committee’s decision to downplay the firmer inflation prints seen from March to May, and weak housing starts and new home sales reports have likely reinforced concern about the housing sector.

But suggest the focus will be on the jobs dashboard:

 

Credit Suisse is a little more hawkish:

The easing should end with the Fed’s final QE3 purchases in October. And if current economic and price trends continue, we expect the Fed to adhere to its forward guidance and reduce the degree of policy accommodation.

 

An adjustment in accommodation probably still is far from imminent, but we now expect the Fed’s first interest rate hike to come in Q3 2015 rather than our earlier expectation of Q4 2015.

 

In its June 18 policy statement, the FOMC “reaffirmed its view that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy remains appropriate,” and it will probably do the same on July 30. In fact, we look for few changes in language from the FOMC today.

 

Assuming continued recovery in the labor market, and modest, though building, price pressures, the Fed will be forced to change its message in the months ahead, explaining that an “appropriate” degree of policy accommodation may well become a “lessened” degree of accommodation.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1xA8pbp Tyler Durden

FOMC Preview: Dashboards, Dissent, & “Degree-Of-Accommodation” Differences

“More of the same,” should summarize today’s FOMC statement. There will be no press conference or refresh of the ‘dot plot’ economic projections. The Fed is expected to continue to taper by $10 billion with confirmation that the “growth meme” is playing out just as they projected (especially after today’s GDP print). Goldman believes the focus will be on the jobs ‘dashboard’ and recent inflation data enables the dovish Fed to argue recent moves were noise and stay easier for longer. The downside risk (for markets) may be that Fed hawks will likely have little luck in altering the way forward guidance is employed by the Fed (and chatter over a Fisher dissent is possible).

 

RanSquawk’s FOMC PREVIEW

  • Fed expected to taper by USD 10bln again, taking monthly bond buys down to USD 25bln from USD 35bln
  • Yet again, all focus on rate pathway and projections for the first Fed Fund Rate (FFR) hike by Fed officials
  • There will be no press conference from Fed Chair Yellen or release of Summary of Economic Projections alongside the decision

TAPERING: The latest announcement from the Fed which coincides with a slew of key economic data such as an initial estimate of growth in the Q2 and the monthly jobs report release by the BLS is expected to result in the Federal Reserve members agreeing on another USD 10bln taper. Likelihood of a larger USD 15bln taper are rather small, as this would almost inevitably risk resulting in a repeat of the “taper tantrum” price action observed last year.

RATES: The accompanying statement is likely to be tweaked to emphasise not only the pickup in growth, but also the subdued and contained nature of inflation expectations. At the same time, members of the Federal Reserve board will continue to actively look at various price measures including wage inflation and debate on the best method for raising rates. As such, despite a potentially more upbeat statement, Fed hawks will likely have little luck in altering the way forward guidance is employed by the Fed, with Fed Fund Rate futures pricing in the first rate hike in June 2015. There is however a risk as noted by analysts at JP Morgan that changing description of unemployment from “elevated” to “somewhat elevated” would allow for a more gradual pivot toward recognising progress toward full employment mandate and therefore could pose a risk to current projected rates path. No one on the FOMC is expected to dissent this time although there is an outside chance that Fisher could, after recently saying that waiting a “considerable time” for the first rate hike implies too long a wait.

MARKET REACTIONS: Given the expectation of a more upbeat picture on the employment situation, there is a risk that that the decision could be interpreted as slightly more hawkish as the Fed move nearer to full employment. At Yellen’s semi-annual testimony, the Fed chair suggested rates could rise sooner than is currently priced in if the employment situation improves and hence there is a risk of USD strength, downside in Treasuries, steepening of the Eurodollars curve, and downside in equity prices. Conversely if the FOMC continue to state that unemployment remains elevated, then the statement will likely be viewed as more dovish and could weigh on the USD. It is worth noting that due to the close proximity of this decision to the release of US GDP and Nonfarm Payrolls that any market reaction could be relatively muted.

 

Goldman expects very little change to the FOMC statement.

The FOMC might choose to upgrade the language on growth in economic activity somewhat, and it might also strengthen the language on labor market indicators a touch in recognition of the strong June employment report.

 

For the most part, however, recent data have supported the characterization of current conditions in the June statement. In particular, the softer June CPI print likely reinforced the Committee’s decision to downplay the firmer inflation prints seen from March to May, and weak housing starts and new home sales reports have likely reinforced concern about the housing sector.

But suggest the focus will be on the jobs dashboard:

 

Credit Suisse is a little more hawkish:

The easing should end with the Fed’s final QE3 purchases in October. And if current economic and price trends continue, we expect the Fed to adhere to its forward guidance and reduce the degree of policy accommodation.

 

An adjustment in accommodation probably still is far from imminent, but we now expect the Fed’s first interest rate hike to come in Q3 2015 rather than our earlier expectation of Q4 2015.

 

In its June 18 policy statement, the FOMC “reaffirmed its view that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy remains appropriate,” and it will probably do the same on July 30. In fact, we look for few changes in language from the FOMC today.

 

Assuming continued recovery in the labor market, and modest, though building, price pressures, the Fed will be forced to change its message in the months ahead, explaining that an “appropriate” degree of policy accommodation may well become a “lessened” degree of accommodation.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1xA8pbp Tyler Durden

Treasury Yields Rise Most In 9 Months, Weak 7 Year Auction Does Not Help

Treasury yields are surging across the complex with the long-end steepening notably. Today’s 10.5bps jump in 10Y yields is the biggest percentage shift since early November 2013… and a significant tail in the 7Y auction just made things worse.

The long-end is suffering most…

 

But the selling is across the complex…

 

It is unclear how much of today’s bond sell-off was a factor in the just concluded 7 Year Treasury offering, but what is clear is that unlike yesterday’s strong 5 Year issuance, today’s auction was disappointing, starting with the High Yield of 2.25%, the highest since April’s 2.32% and tailing the 2.24% When Issued by 1 bp. And while the Bid to Cover was a slight improvement from last month’s 2.435 rising to 2.581, it was the internals where we saw a flight of Direct bidders, who only took down 15.2% of the auction. This was the lowest allotment since July 2012. The offset: a pick up by Indirects from 40.6% to 47.4% while Dealers ended up with 37.4% of the auction.

Regardless of the auction one thing is clear, the shorting of bonds today will continue until the squeeze, as has been the case for all of 2014, returns.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1xA8nAp Tyler Durden

Feds Gave Tor Project $1.8M While NSA Actively Tried to Destroy It

The Tor Project is a great way
for people to cover their tracks on the Internet. Because of this,
some in the federal government, specifically the National Security
Agency (NSA),
really dislikes Tor
. So it comes as a bit of a surprise that
the project actually received over $1.8 million in federal money
last year.

The Tor Project, which provides free software to users
interested in surveillance- and censorship-resistant web activity,
recently released its financial statements and reports for 2013,
and sources began taking note yesterday.

The documents
show
that the State Department directly granted the
organization $256,900 as part of its mission to fund “international
programs [that] support democracy, human rights and labor.”
Additional indirect funding from State Department money added up to
$882,313.

The Department of Defense didn’t provide any direct funding, but
through SRI International, “a non-profit research and development
centre that aims to bridge the gap between abstract research and
industry”
according
to The Guardian, the Tor Project landed
another $830,269. SRI’s funding went toward “basic and applied
research and development in areas relating to the Navy command,
control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance.”

Additional funding from the U.S. Agency for International
Development and the National Science Foundation added up to a
total of $1,822,907 either directly or indirectly from the federal
government.

This is a boost over 2012, when Tor received a total of $1.2
million in federal money, all of which was indirect,
notes The Guardian.

Tor has
rockier relations
with
other tentacles
 of the feds, though. BBC provides some
history:

Tor was thrust into the spotlight in the wake of controversy
resulting from leaks about the National Security Agency and other
cyberspy agencies. Edward Snowden, the whistleblower who revealed
the internal memos and who now has asylum in Russia, uses
a version of Tor software to communicate
.

Documents released by Mr Snowden allege that the NSA and the
UK’s GCHQ had repeatedly tried to crack anonymity on the Tor
network.

Tor was originally set up by the US Naval Research Laboratory
and is used be people who want to send information over the
internet without being tracked.

Part of the network’s success lies
in the fact that it “has gone mainstream in the past few years, and
its wide diversity of users — from civic-minded individuals
and ordinary consumers to activists, law enforcement, and companies
— is part of its security.” 

Tor made headlines earlier this month when a yet-unidentified
whistleblower leaked information suggesting that
the NSA is still trying to crack the network
and snoop on
anybody who uses the anonymizing network as well as people who

simply browses websites that regularly discuss Tor … like
Reason


Watch
Reason TV’s interview with the Tor Project’s development
director:

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1qLgTi4
via IFTTT

Shikha Dalmia on Liberal Duplicity on Obamacare

Obama.Dont.CareLast week was a bad week for Obamacare.
First, a three-judge DC Circuit Court panel ruled against the
program in Halbig vs. Sebelius, basically declaring the millions of
dollars that the administration had handed out in subsidies through
federal exchanges as illegals.

Then, a video surfaced showing that a key architect of
Obamacare, MIT’s Jonathan Gruber, was completely on board with the
plaintiffs’ rationale—before he was against it and started calling
it  “nutty” and “stupid” and “screwy.”

Every time Gruber tried to explain his flip-flop, he came across
as even more of a liar and an idiot, as Reason Foundation Senior
Analyst Shikha Dalmia explains.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1qnt1Rw
via IFTTT

“Three Lost Decades” – How the American Middle Class is 20% Poorer Now vs. 1984

Screen Shot 2014-07-30 at 11.16.01 AMLike so many other things in popular American culture, this quaint notion of a “middle class” in the U.S. is at this point nothing more than a myth; a rapidly fading fantasy from a bygone era. As myself and many others have noted for quite some time, the decimation of the middle class began long ago. It really got started in the early 1970′s after Nixon defaulted on the gold standard and financialization began to take over the American economy. Median real wages haven’t increased since that time and the rest is history.

continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/UBCk6m
via IFTTT

Religious Freedom and the Great Faux-Rights Arms Race of 2014: Elizabeth Nolan Brown at The Week

I’ve got a piece up today at The
Week
 about
several new “religious freedom” lawsuits
 and the
nonsensical battle for faux-rights that’s been heating up in 2014.
One of these cases involves U.S. Bank teller Polly Neace, who was
fired after continuing to tell customers “have a blessed day” after
the bank asked her to stop. “I was upset with the fact they were
stifling me and not allowing me to act on my beliefs,”
she told a
local news station. She’s now suing for employment
discrimination.

Neace’s case is among a crop of current religious-freedom
lawsuits more predicated on wringing special protections and
allowances from the state than legit struggle for freedom from
religious persecution or discrimination. A version of this has been
popular on all sides of late. From my piece at The
Week
:

Everyone’s fighting not for actual access to things — wedding
photographs, emergency contraception, nursing jobs — but for
symbolic state sanctioning of their access, without compromise.

It’s tedious, this balancing of faux-rights. Freedom of religion
simply cannot mean the right to behave in any manner so long as
it’s religiously motivated and still gain or retain a job. And
luckily, freedom of association (and the free market) means that
those devout believers who can’t bear not to tell every passerby
they’re blessed can seek out a job where this is appreciated. A
nurse vehemently opposed to contraception could go into any health
care arena other than reproductive medicine. A woman who resents
her employer’s exclusion of birth-control coverage can seek more
liberal pastures elsewhere. You have to give a little, take a
little, as the great Jimmy Durante says.

Go here to
read the whole thing. 

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1qnsZct
via IFTTT

Proctologists Despair: Researchers Devise a Potential Universal Cancer Test

ColonoscopyI know that, like me, many of
you look forward to colonscopies every five years, annual prostate
massages, and the singular excitement of esophageal endoscopy as
ways to check for early signs of cancer. That being the case, it is
my sad duty to report that some researchers at the University of
Bradford believe that they are well on the way to creating a new
universal cancer test. The new blood test involves checking white
blood cells for stress. The more stressed, the more likely the
patient has cancer. As ScienceDaily reports:

The test will enable doctors to rule out cancer in patients
presenting with certain symptoms, saving time and preventing costly
and unnecessary invasive procedures such as colonoscopies and
biopsies being carried out. Alternatively, it could be a useful aid
for investigating patients who are suspected of having a cancer
that is currently hard to diagnose.

Early results have shown the method gives a high degree of
accuracy diagnosing cancer and pre-cancerous conditions from the
blood of patients with melanoma, colon cancer and lung cancer. The
research is published online in FASEB Journal, the US
journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental
Biology.

The Lymphocyte Genome Sensitivity (LGS) test looks at white
blood cells and measures the damage caused to their DNA when
subjected to different intensities of ultraviolet light (UVA),
which is known to damage DNA. The results of the empirical study
show a clear distinction between the damage to the white blood
cells from patients with cancer, with pre-cancerous conditions and
from healthy patients.

Sigh. This could be goodbye to
twilight sedation
.

But seriously folks, here’s hoping this promising result will
prove out.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1nJ6ikF
via IFTTT

Tonight on The Independents: Red Meat Wednesday, With John Stossel, Jalen Rose on School Choice (!), the USA Freedom Act, Two Minutes’ Hate, and More!

Tonight’s episode of The
Independents
(Fox Business Network, 9 p.m. ET, 6 p.m. PT,
with re-airs three hours later) features the triumphant (if tardy!)
return of Fox Human Resources Director Bernie Maxsmith, who will
deliver your very best Two Minutes’ Hate. It will also feature the
Independents debut of basketball star-turned-commentator
Jalen
Rose
, who will talk about his Detroit charter school the Jalen
Rose Leadership Academy, his recent OC Register essay
When
a ZIP code determines a child’s future
,” and his participation
in a video called “Educational Choice Now.” Watch
that below:

Speaking of basketball, Party Panelists Paul Mecurio (Wall Street
lawyer-turned comedian) and Monica Crowley
(Fox
News
analyst, radio
host
, author of
What the (Bleep) Just Happened?
The Happy
Warrior’s Guide to the Great American Comeback
) are slated to
discuss: A) the recent controversies over ESPN commentator Stephen
A. Smith
being suspended
for his comments about domestic violence after
NFL player Ray Rice was suspended (for only twice the amount of
time) for
actually beating up a lady
; B) the latest Israel/Hamas
developments; C) immigration policy
debates
; and D) Hillary Clinton’s latest iteration of
foot-in-mouth disease
about her speaking career.

The co-hosts will talk about the Senate’s version of the

USA Freedom Act
, and John Stossel himself will talk about the
importance of being allowed to experiment—especially on yourself.
(You won’t want to miss the personal details!)

Follow The Independents on Facebook at http://ift.tt/QYHXdB,
follow on Twitter @ independentsFBN, and
click on this page
for more video of past segments.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1nJ6kJh
via IFTTT

French Housing "In Total Meltdown", "Current Figures Are Disastrous"

If Venezuela is the case study of a country in the late stages of transition into a socialist utopia, then France is the clear runner up. The most recent case in point, aside from the already sliding French economy, whose recent contraction can be best seen be deteriorating PMI data…

… which hints at the dreaded “triple dip” recession, nowhere is the economic collapse in France more evident than in its housing market which as even Bloomberg admits, citing industry participants, is now “in total meltdown.

The reason? The belief of the socialist president that a few economists know better than the overall market, especially when the sanctity of the “fairness doctrine” and the greater good is to be upheld at all costs. To wit: “French President Francois Hollande’s government may have made a housing slump worse, pushing the construction market to its lowest in more than 15 years. Housing starts fell 19 percent in the second quarter from a year earlier, and permits — a gauge of future construction — dropped 13 percent, the French Housing Ministry said yesterday.

The reason: a law that was passed this year that seeks to make housing more affordable by capping rents in expensive neighborhoods. To protect home buyers, the law also boosted the number of documents that must be provided by sellers, leading to a decline in home sales and longer transaction times.

Of course, it didn’t take long for the government to realize its mistake and to scramble to adjust the rules, but “the damage is done, threatening France’s anemic recovery that’s already lagging behind those of the U.K. and Germany.”

Enter the soundbites: “Construction is in total meltdown,” said Dominique Barbet, an economist at BNP Paribas in Paris. “It’s difficult to see how the new housing law is not to blame.”

Barbet says the drop in home building lopped 0.4 points off France’s gross domestic product growth last year and cut the pace of expansion by a third in the first quarter. Expenditure in the sector was at its lowest level ever as a portion of total real GDP in the first quarter at 4.7 percent, down from 6.3 percent in the first three months of 2007, he estimates.

Sales of new-build homes fell 5 percent in the first quarter from a year earlier and are down by about a third compared with their level in 2007, according to Credit Agricole.

It’s not just the government to blame, though: central planning, which has made the rich richer beyond their wildest dreams has pushed prices near all-time highs in the Paris are, making real estate inaccessible to all but the richest, and leading a crunch in new construction and the associated spending. This is further impacted by the country’s record jobless claims, which in turn is leading to a plunge in sales and profits at building material and electrical equipment makers including Cie. de Saint-Gobain SA, Lafarge SA, Vicat SA, Schneider Electric SE, Legrand SA and Rexel SA.

Enter more soundbites: “Current figures are worrying and will be disastrous if nothing is done; clients of the building sector are sounding the alarm bell,” Pierre-Andre de Chalendar, chief executive officer of Saint-Gobain, said this month. “It’s as though everything is being done to discourage investment in housing.”

Alternatively, it is as if everything is done by a socialist government to boost the economy. The outcome almost without fail is the same. Alain Dinin, chairman of property company Nexity (NXI), concurs.

“The French residential real estate market has been in a particularly tough situation,” he told investors after last week posting a drop in first-half revenue. “A host of complex regulations have been introduced and, most importantly, buyer sentiment has suffered. All those factors have combined to slow the already historically-low rate of new homes entering the market.”

The direct threat of this housing collapse is that the country’s already lowered GDP forecast may end up sliding to 0%, if not negative:

Reduced home construction is threatening Hollande’s goal of increasing GDP by 1 percent this year. The International Monetary Fund slashed its 2014 French growth forecast to 0.7 percent this month from 1 percent previously. The IMF expects expansions of 1.9 percent in Germany and 3.2 percent in the U.K., as well as growth of 1.2 percent in Spain.

 

Hollande, who has been trying to revive an economy that has barely grown in two years, is grappling with a record 3.3 million jobless claims and an approval rating that’s at the lowest level ever for any French president.

 

Construction has the advantage of being an industry that’s easy to revive and lifts the broader economy by leading to the hiring of less-skilled workers and spurring private investment, economists say.

 

“A recovery in construction would help the rebound but it won’t happen without government initiative,” said Ludovic Subran, chief economist at Euler Hermes in Paris. Building is “a sector where the impact on growth and employment is felt immediately.”

Sadly, the underlying problem is one which even China has figured out has no solution, and where a housing sector saddled with insurmountable debt has only one short-term “fix” – even more debt to boost sales for another quarter or two, while kicking the can of the inevitable collapse a little further, assuring that the plunge, when it comes, will be worse than anything experienced.

In France, it is no different, and the “solution” is to do more of what has not worked:

State-controlled financial institution Caisse des Depots is starting talks with public and private investors to raise funds to build several tens of thousands homes in the greater Paris region, where the lack of available land and a rising population has boosted housing prices.

 

“If we invest public money and funds from the Caisse, we must lure private investors,” Caisse des Depots CEO Pierre-Rene Lemas said in a July 6 interview. “Some talks are starting with a view to conclude by the end of the year.” Sylvia Pinel, who replaced former housing minister Cecile Duflot in April, has also introduced measures to revive the construction market, and cut some rules to reduce construction costs.

At the end of the day, the only thing left is what has so far prevented the world from imploding since the Lehman collapse on the back of trillions in central bank liquidity: preserving public confidence at all costs.

“What is important for France is to reassure people, to reassure everyone who wants to invest and to restore confidence,” Lafarge CEO Bruno Lafont said in an interview with Bloomberg Television last week, calling for simpler rules, lower construction costs, and incentives for institutional investors to invest more in housing.

But, as Bloomberg summarizes it best: “It may be too little too late.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1ttDeke Tyler Durden