Why Bill De Blasio’s Comments on Eric Garner Grand Jury Decision Are Full of Shit

De Blasio et alHere’s
what Bill de Blasio, New York City’s Democratic mayor, said today
about the grand jury decision not to indict the cop who put Eric
Garner in a fatal chokehold:

These goals – of bringing police and community closer together
and changing the culture of law enforcement — are why we have
introduced so many reforms this year.  It starts at the top
with Commissioner Bratton – a strong, proven change agent. We
have dramatically reduced the overuse and abuse of stop-and-frisk.
We have initiated a comprehensive plan to retrain the entire NYPD
to reduce the use of excessive force and to work with the
community. We have changed our marijuana policy to reduce
low-level arrests, and we have launched a new pilot program for
body cameras for officers to improve transparency and
accountability.

You can read the rest of his bloviating
here
. Keep in mind de Blasio is not a community organizer or
even a council man, he is the mayor of New York City, the chief
executive of the municipal government. In days gone by, you could
say the buck “stopped with him.”

Bill Bratton, the NYPD commissioner, was also a commissioner
during the tenure of Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, a very different kind
of “change agent” than the kind needed to bring about police
reforms. As for body cameras—if the NYPD has the resources to
deploy plainclothes officers on Staten Island that keep an eye out
for loose cigarettes, it surely has the resources to put a body
camera on every cop.

More specifically, however, de Blasio has already rejected the
kind of reforms that would substantively improve police-community
relations—changes that would roll back New York City’s nanny state
and the laws that bring cops into often contentious interactions
with residents, over things like loose, untaxed cigarettes,

barbecuing in front of the house
, or, yes,
possession of a little bit of marijuana
.

From my column on de Blasio’s comments in the
wake of Eric Garner’s death
:

In a press
conference
 this week New York City’s progressive mayor,
Democrat Bill de Blasio, insisted the police department would
continue to “strictly enforce” such laws as the ones that led to
the series of controversial police interactions. “The law is the
law,” the mayor said. These kinds of laws, however,
disproportionately affect the same kind of people—the poor and
marginalized—that De Blasio and his ideological fellow-travelers
adamantly claim to defend. Absent brutal encounters with police
violations of petty laws can
lead
 to thousands of dollars in fines, multiple court
appearances, and even jail time. What amounts to a “minor
inconvenience” in the eyes of the privileged political class that
pushes these laws can have profound negative effects on the lives
of normal people. Coupled with the threat of bodily harm or even
death during the initial police encounter, such “petty” crimes
become anything but for the people the government targets in its
enforcement efforts.

At the same press conference, meanwhile, de Blasio’s “agent of
change,” Bratton, insisted New York City residents “correct their
behavior” when being approached by cops, explaining that that’s
what democracy was. 

Reason is your voice in debates about
politics, culture, and ideas. Our annual Webathon is underway and
your tax-deductible gift will help us fight against big government,
crony capitalism, the drug war, and so much more. For details
on giving levels and swag, go here
now
.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1wubRbT
via IFTTT

Man Arrested for Holding a Banana

Not only is it not polite to point,
it may get you a criminal record. Mesa County, Colorado, resident
Nathan Channing, 27, was recently arrested for holding a banana, which police
mistook for a gun, and allegedly pointing it at them. 

Channing told deputies he was doing a trial run for a YouTube
video. “It’s a banana!” Channing shouted as deputies drew their
guns.

Still, deputies approached the fruit with caution. There
were no cameras in the vicinity to suggest a YouTube video,
they said.

“A lot of time it’s how someone behaves and treats an object,
depends on whether or not that object is actually dangerous or is a
weapon,” a sheriff’s office spokesman said. He said the banana
could have been a firearm in disguise.

“It this case, it turned out to just be a banana,” he noted.

Shocking! What with the massive prevalence of faux-fruit
firearms out there and all.. 

Though Channing initially faced two felony menacing charges, the
DA’s office has oh-so-magnanimously decided to lessen the charge to
obstructing a peace officer, a misdemeanor. “I decided while Mr.
Channing’s conduct was felony stupid, it didn’t really deserve a
felony charge,” Mesa County District Attorney Pete
Hautzinger told KREX.

(Obligatory note of approval/mild surprise that, hey, at least
Channing wasn’t shot.) 

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/11W9vFo
via IFTTT

Cop Who Killed Tamir Rice Was Previously Kicked off Force for ‘Dismal’ Gun Performance, Emotional Instability

Tamir RiceTimothy Loehmann,
the Cleveland police officer
who shot and killed
12-year-old Tamir Rice within two seconds
of encountering the boy, was deemed “unfit for duty” while serving
on another police force. Supervisors specifically cited his
“dismal” handgun performance and emotional instability when they
forced him to resign in December 2012.

Loehmann was previously employed by the City of Independence.
During a training exercise at a gun range, he became “distracted
and weepy,” according to information obtained by
The Guardian
:

Officer Timothy Loehmann, who killed Tamir Rice on 22 November,
was specifically faulted for breaking down emotionally while
handling a live gun. During a training episode at a firing range,
Loehmann was reported to be “distracted and weepy” and
incommunicative. “His handgun performance was dismal,” deputy chief
Jim Polak of the Independence, Ohio, police
department wrote in an internal memo.

The memo concludes with a recommendation that Loehmann be
“released from the employment of the City of Independence”. Less
than a week later, on 3 December 2012, Loehmann resigned.

Loehmann was hired by Cleveland PD in March of this year. It
isn’t clear whether the department knew about his previous
struggles. If it didn’t, then apparently his background check was
neglected. If it did—and hired him anyway—that’s even more
damning.

Rice was killed while playing with a fake gun at the park. The
toy’s orange cap had been removed, rendering it impossible to
distinguish from a real gun. Even so, the 911 caller who alerted
the authorities told them that the boy he spied playing with a
weapon was probably carrying a fake. It’s not clear whether
Loehmann was given that information; the police union has said that
he wasn’t.

Regardless,
video surveillance
shows Loehmann drive up to Rice and kill him
within two seconds.

The shooting is an outrage, even if Loehmann had an impeccable
record. But this latest news does make it worse, and shows that the
department deserves some blame.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1wtKK0L
via IFTTT

NYPD Chief Bratton Uses Unfortunate Metaphor of ‘Breathing Room’ to Describe How Cops Could Handle Garner Protests

If a miscarriage of justice over a police officer choking Eric
Garner to death after he isn’t properly deferential when being
approached over suspicion of the possibility of selling untaxed
cigararettes, in which Garner’s famous last words, over and over,
were “I can’t breathe,” results in the possibility of public
protests, what will the New York Police Department do?

Why,
according to NYPD Chief Bratton
:

“If they engage in criminal activity, such as vandalism—actual
crime—they will be arrested, quite simply,” he said. “But we have
the ability to have a level of tolerance—breathing room, if you
will,” Bratton said.

Now, there is no way this was a deliberate reference to Garner’s
final words as a cop killed him—it just couldn’t be, no one’s that
big a jerk.

But this unfortunate choice of words under the circumstances
points up something Bratton needs to inculcate in his officers down
the line: Potentially deadly force might be justified in preventing
harm to citizens’ lives or property.

It should not be a mere tool of enforcing obediance in a
situation that involves none of those things. Police not only
should have “breathing room” to not enforce the law to the letter
and with utmost force—they should understand that it is never
appropriate to do so when it involves potentially deadly force over
matters not related to protecting lives or property.

It’s nice that speaking colloquially, even Bratton understands
the difference between “actual crime” and just not obeying officers
commands.

Especially in the unfortunate world we live in when there are
laws the police are expected to enforce over selling cigarettes
without giving the government a cut.

Reason on
Garner
. Do note we were on this and outraged about it
from the start
.

Reason is your voice in debates about
politics, culture, and ideas. Our annual Webathon is underway and
your tax-deductible gift will help us fight against big government,
crony capitalism, the drug war, and so much more. For details
on giving levels and swag, go here
now
.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1wtKJtQ
via IFTTT

Crushing The “Lower Gas Price = More Spending” Fiction

Excerpted from Sterne Agee's Chief Economist Lindsey Piegaz report,

Caveats to the equation: lower gas prices = more spending

Aside from the long-standing issues of minimal income growth and lackluster job creation, consumers have become accustomed to an end-of-the-year price reprieve at the pump, and in some cases are simply using the increased funds to offset rising utilities and health care costs. We explore the various facets of this in further detail below:

1) Consumers have become accustomed to extreme volatility in energy prices. Particularly around this time of year, consumers are increasingly familiar with energy price reprieve from summer gas prices and no longer adjust their long-term spending habits as much, or at all, based on short-term price fluctuations.

Since reaching a high of $3.69 in June, average gas prices have fallen more than fifty cents a gallon, to a monthly average of $3.17 as of October, and have continued to fall throughout the early weeks of November. While impressive, this four-month decline is hardly unusual. In 2011, retail gasoline prices fell from an average monthly high of $3.91 in May to $3.27 by year-end, a decline of nearly sixty-five cents over seven months.

Then again in 2012, after ratcheting up to $3.85 at the end of September, gasoline prices tumbled more than fifty cents a gallon in just three months, down to $3.31 before turning the corner to 2013. And finally, last year told a similar story of lower energy prices before the holidays, dropping nearly thirty-five cents by the end of the year to $3.28 a gallon.

In each case, retail spending was hardly robust with an average monthly sales pace of 0.4% over the past four years. In fact, the largest monthly increase was in September 2012, up over 1%, thanks to a hefty increase in electronics purchases corresponding to the release of the iPhone 5. This September, retail sales saw a similar boost from the release of the iPhone 6.

As consumers increasingly anticipate sub-$3 gas prices to be more common in the coming year, however, according to the NACS, consumers say they are more willing to increase spending in the near term. In other words, as consumers anticipate permanency in price cuts at the pump, they are more inclined to adjust and increase consumption. According to the latest survey of consumer optimism, 21% of shoppers interviewed say they are looking forward to spending more in the coming months, up from just 15% in October. Although, the survey also found that 65% of Americans plan to spend the same this holiday season, with only 14% pointing to gas prices as a catalyst to potentially spending more.

2) Energy prices are going down, perhaps temporarily, but other costs are going up, some permanently.

While gas prices are aggressively retreating, cost savings at the pump are simply helping to offset price increases in other areas of household spending, particularly utilities and healthcare services. Service expenditures typically account for two-thirds of consumer spending, with the remaining one-third comprised of goods consumption. The largest component of service expenditure is housing and utilities, and as winter ensues, heating bills rise, diverting even more spending power to household energy consumption. While some conditions appear to have the consumer on better footing relative to last year’s harsh polar vortex, with winter storms already making their way across the Northeast and Southwest, and temperatures dropping in some areas to the single digits, consumers are already spending their savings from the pump on heating the family house.

In 2013, consumers ramped up service spending at the end of the year at the expense of goods spending, as Americans enrolled in Obamacare. The average family shelled out an extra $600 over the winter season to combat one of the coldest and snowiest winters in years. Of course, rising natural gas prices only exacerbated the situation in early 2014, with a high of $6/MMBtu by February. This year, again, consumers may not escape unscathed. Already natural gas prices have far exceeded levels this time last year, and according to the Farmer’s Almanac, this winter will be colder than normal, “with the coldest periods in late December, throughout January, and in early February.” Furthermore, snowfall is expected to be above normal in most regions with the snowiest periods in mid-December, and mid-January. In other words, lower prices at the pump may have translated into an extra $100 for the average family, but many Americans bracing for another terrible winter are hoping for further gas price reprieve, enough to cover higher winter heating bills.

Behind only housing and utilities, healthcare is the largest component of consumer service spending at 26%, accounting for nearly 18% of total household spending. In part driven by the availability of excellent treatment and the latest technology, and in part by the Affordable Care Act, both healthcare costs and total expenditures are rapidly rising. According to a national online private insurance exchange, health insurance premiums have increased between 39-56% since early 2013. For an average family, that means paying $663 a month, an increase of $230 a month or nearly $3,000 annually. Over the past three months, a price decline of more than $0.50 a gallon has left consumers with a modest increase of cash in their pocket, ranging between $80-100 assuming the average two-car household fills up each 20-gallon tank at least four times a month. And while a savings of $100 is hardly something to sneeze at, relative to rising healthcare costs 30 times greater, such savings is hardly momentum to ramp up spending when other bills need to be paid.

 

3) Consumer confidence reflects a relatively better holiday season.

Thinking back to the winter of 2013, it’s hard to argue consumers are not relatively better off this time around. After all, last year’s holiday season was dominated by a government shutdown and an extremely harsh winter weather which, based on personal opinion entirely, was the worst winter in history. This year, while consumers were inundated with negative ads surrounding the mid-term elections, most consumer surveys show consumer sentiment was more widely affected by overall economic concerns such as improvement in the labor market, international risks including the threat of the deadly Ebola virus, and pocketbook issues such as falling gas prices and rising healthcare costs. Still, as retailers count on just these last few months of the year for up to 40% of their annual revenues, a relatively more confident consumer may not be enough to ensure more “merry” this holiday season. After rising 0.6% in August, an above trend rise, consumer spending has been flat with October’s rise simply offsetting the decline the month prior.

While consumers may feel on stronger footing relative to the quicksand in Nov/Dec 2013, enough to continue to drive expectations higher, consumers’ assessment of current conditions remains little changed over the past three months following an initial pop in August as gas prices began their descent. In other words, the limited boost in sales in August as a result of increased consumer confidence may have been the extent of the ramp up in spending resulting from a decline in gas prices.

 

4) The labor market remains suboptimal, leading to increased savings.

Some consumers are increasingly willing to spend now in anticipation of increased spending power down the road. For many Americans, however, unemployment and underemployment have dampened the outlook for future earnings. Despite being more than five years into the recovery, wages remains stagnant, undermining optimism for an increased ability to finance today’s spending with tomorrow’s wages. In the October Employment report, while headline job creation rose 214k and the unemployment rate fell further to 5.8%, average hourly earnings rose 0.1% in October, maintaining a stagnant 2% annual pace. In fact, average wage increases have remained stubbornly low at a 1.9% annual pace since 2010.

With uncertainty lingering and patience wearing thin after five+ years of still lackluster wage growth, consumers are increasing saving for the future, hedging against a continuation of “more of the same.” Thus, for many, extra savings at the pump as a result of lower gas prices are simply being stored away to help supplement spending needs in the future, ramping up savings, not spending. As of September, consumers increased savings from 5.4% to a 5.6% pace, up from a recent low of 4.3% in November of last year.

Conclusion

Against the backdrop of three consecutive months of aggressive energy price reprieve, retail sales have fallen short. With more than a $0.50 drop in the average cost of a gallon of gasoline, anything less than a minimal 0.5% increase in monthly retail sales highlights just how fragile the U.S. economy remains, particularly the consumer sector. While the weakness in October was dominated by a few categories, there was insufficient demand elsewhere to compensate. Consumers continue to spend, but at a modest level with no sign of further momentum in sight with income growth stubbornly limited, and consumers opting to use savings from lower gas prices to offset rising healthcare and utilities costs. We are, after all, a consumer based economy, and if the consumer is struggling to go out and spend on goods and services, or if Americans are simply hesitant to ramp up spending, it could be a very un-merry holiday season for retailers. From the Fed’s perspective, if consumer spending continues to disappoint, headline activity is likely to significantly underperform monetary policy officials’ optimistic forecast of +2% in 2014 and circa 3% in 2015.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1FPw4KY Tyler Durden

James Montier: “Stocks Are Hideously Expensive” In “The First Central Bank Sponsored Bubble”

Via Mark Dittli at Finanz und Wirtschaft,

James Montier, the outspoken value investor and member of the asset allocation team of Boston-based GMO, talks about dangerously high valuations and the virtues of holding dry powder.

Four words seem to define the current mood in financial markets: There Is No Alternative. Yes, equity markets might be somewhat expensive, but considering the alternatives – bonds and cash –, they are still the best investment. The correction in October turned out to be a mere hickup in a solid bull market. But James Montier remains skeptical. The value investor and member of the asset allocation team at Boston-based asset manager GMO sees the stock market in a near-bubble and warns investors from being complacent. "To think that central banks will always be there to bail out equity investors is incredibly dangerous", says the outspoken Brit. His source of wisdom in current markets comes from none other than Winnie the Pooh: "Never underestimate the value of doing nothing."

James, when you screen global equity markets today: Do you still find any value?

It’s getting really tough now. It’s getting harder and harder to find really good sources of value these days. There are maybe one or two pockets out there, in Europe and in some emerging markets.

Where exactly?

Emerging markets are really bifurcated into stocks you don’t want to own at all, because they are really expensive, and stocks that are outright cheap, but they are also pretty damn scary. In that field, I talk about Russian energy or Chinese banks. I personally don’t like the latter but one can make the argument that they are at least optically cheap. There are a lot of reasons why these stocks are cheap. The good news is that everybody knows why they’re cheap, which means it’s all in the price already. But apart from that, it’s really hard to find anything that is reasonably cheap out there.

So in a simple beauty contest between Russian energy versus Chinese banks you’d go for the former?

Yes, I’d go for Russian energy. The problem with the Chinese banks is that they are optically cheap, i.e. they trade on high dividend yields and low PEs. But they are financials, and the credit cycle in China is pretty extended. We’ve been looking at the market-implied levels of non-performing loans in the Chinese banking system, and we came out with 9%. Which is ok, but if you look at a serious, big banking crisis, you get NPL way in excess of 9%. In Thailand in 1997 we saw a NPL level of 45%. I’m not sure there is a big margin of safety in Chinese banks. It certainly is not big enough for my taste.

And you get that margin of safety in Russia?

Yes, certaily more so. Gazprom tradex at a PE of 2, Lukoil  at 3, Surgutneftegaz as well. You don’t want to necessarily target one particular company, in order not to maximise your single stock risk. But if you own the group of them, and one is being taken out by the government, which is not impossible in Russia, you are partly protected. They are cheap. A lot of bad news is in the price. The whole Russian market trades on a Shiller-PE of 5. It’s hard think that the world has not priced in the risks that are associated with Russia. Mind you, they are real risks, I think the problem in some ways is the outcomes are almost binary. Expropriation is the thing you worry about when investing in Russia, and there is no way of telling if it happens or not. Either it will or it won’t. Investing in Russia has option-like characteristics. It’s either worth nothing or a lot more than what it is trading on now.

Any other examples of screaming value?

I’d say Samsung Electronics and generally the Korean chaebols. The government of Korea has been a big shareholder in the chaebols, and they are pushing them for reform now: Breaking up businesses, sell non-core assets, pay out higher dividends. So unlike in Russia, where the government is scary, in Korea the government is on your side as a shareholder. The big issue for Korea right now of course is what’s happening in Japan. The Yen weakness is really hurting Korea, the exporters are screaming for a weaker Won. At some stage it can easily be seen that the Korean government will want to weaken the Won and push their exports.

Where do you find value in Europe?

There was a lot in the periphery two years ago, but that has faded. Today, the periphery is okay, but not outright cheap. There are some stocks in the cyclical and industrial field that still can be considered value in Europe. Again, I would not go for financials in Europe, even though they appear cheap. The big question for European value is how you deal with the reality of deflation. Deflation is a clear risk for any value investor.

Why is that?

When you’re a value investor, you focus on the intrinsic worth or asset value, i.e. what is this company worth if I break it up tomorrow and sell its assets. That’s the fallback value of the company. The problem with deflation is it destroys the value of assets every day. Every day that goes by with deflation, your assets are worth less than the day before in real terms. That is a real problem, because it effectively undermines the core essence of value.

But didn’t the value approach work well in Japan?

True. In Japan we saw zero inflation for twenty years, and value as an investment approach has done remarkably well. So to the extent that Japan is a template, then value should work fine in Europe. But one has to be mindful of the effects that a more severe deflation causes for value investors.

And how do you deal with that risk?

Ask for an even bigger margin of safety. The value investor Seth Klarman has spelled this out nicely: One, you have to be much more conservative in your assumptions and demand a much larger margin of safety. Or two: you simply don’t get involved at all.

Is there any value left in the U.S. stock market?

Not really. We’ve been selling out some of our high quality names, you know, the Microsofts, J&Js, Pfizers and Procter & Gambles of this world. We still own a little bit, but we are selling them down. Fundamentally we still think they are a very low risk business;they offer high profitability and low leverage. Their valuation support simply has come down. Our seven year forecast for U.S. high quality is about 2% real per annum. That’s a long way from the 6% we think is fair value. They are not cheap anymore.

What’s your overall equity allocation at GMO now?

We are at 36% in straight equities. We started last year at 54% and have been selling down steadily. What we did instead is increase our exposure in alternatives to the equity market, like selling at the money puts at the index level. That has a very different payout than long equities. You sell one month puts rather than hold something for seven years. But put selling is only attractive when volatility is reasonably high. We’re not doing much put selling now, because volatility has collapsed again. Another alternative is merger arbitrage. They add up to short duration equity exposure. They share the same risks as equities, but offer a much shorter time horizon.

The stock market just keeps zooming up. A low equity allocation must be hurting you now.

That is the problem. This is the first central bank sponsored near-bubble. There is just nowhere to hide.

Why do you call it a near-bubble? After all, the S&P 500 trades on a Shiller-PE or more than 26.

I fully agree with you. One shouldn’t dwell too much on the semantics of a bubble. We at GMO define bubbles as a two standard deviation move away from the long term trend. And we are not quite there yet. We’d need another 10 to 15%. But let’s say it in simple terms: For all purposes, this is a hideously expensive market. I don’t care if it’s a bubble or not. It’s too expensive, and I don’t need to own it. But because this is a central bank sponsored near bubble, it hurts to stay away.

So central banks are pushing investors into riskier assets?

Yes. Cash rates are zero in nominal terms, and negative in real terms, bond yields are not going up anytime soon. In 2000, you could stay away from equities, sit in cash and get paid almost 3% in real terms. Or you could buy TIPS, emerging market equities, old economy small caps, and so on. There were cheap opportunities out there. And again in 2007, cash still gave you 2,5% real. Today, cash gives you minus 2% in real terms. That’s the big difference. The question for every investor is how much do you let this negative cash rate influence your behaviour. Some of us are willing to own more equities, because the alternatives are just appalling. Others like me are saying cash is negative, but the danger of owning equities that are way too expensive is just much worse. In cash, I know my downside, but equities can fall precipitously from a wildly overvalued level. I am not being compensated for that risk. The path for equities will not be nice and smooth and linear over the next seven years.

Whenever we have a small correction, it only lasts for a couple of weeks before markets head up again. Doesnt’ that convince investors that you can always buy the dip?

Yes, absolutely. That kind of mentality will lead to a bubble, when fear is removed and is being replaced with the fear of missing the upside, i.e. greed. Once you get that mentality, you enter a bubble. The narrative is simple: We are all protected, underwritten by central banks. That’s a very tempting thought in the short term, but incredibly dangerous. The central banks will protect us up until they don’t anymore. And you don’t know when that will be.

Are there any investment opportunities left in fixed income?

There is some stuff you can do. The forward curve offers some opportunity: They are pricing in a fair amount of rate normalization in the US and UK. The market implies a reasonable amount of tightening. If you take a three year bond four years forward, it yields about 3%. I’d take that. You can own that belly of the curve area of the forward market. If rates don’t rise as much as implied, then you make some more money. You only lose money in that field if rates go up faster than the market implies, and I don’t think that looks like a particularly serious risk today. Also, we are short Japanese government bonds.

Even though that’s considered a widowmaker trade?

Yes, and I know that from painful personal experience. I wrote a paper in 1997 when JGB yields were at 3%, saying they could not possibly get any lower. And I watched them halve and halve again. But now the view of our fixed income guys is they just can’t gothat much lower. And unlike in 1997, they are probably right. What’s the worst that can happen? The yields won’t go to zero, so the loss is limited. I’m not sure shorting JGBs is going to be a hugely positive investment either, though. I am a skeptic of prime minister Shinzo Abe and his plans. To me, there is no evidence that inflation is actually coming back in Japan. The sequencing that Abe has to achieve in order to get inflation back is so difficult. He starts by devaluing the Yen, okay, but what that does is raise import prices, which means the average Japanese person just had a wage cut. That’s deflationary, not inflationary. You may raise the CPI headline, but you are stripping out the ability of the consumer to spend. Abe’s next phase would have to be to get wage inflation going. There’s no sign of that at all yet. And until he gets that sequencing order right, it won’t work. A CPI headline of 3% is useless, you just have to strip out the consumption tax increase and the price of imported energy. Core Japanese inflation is 60 basis points. So I don’t think you’ll get a riotous rout in JGB yields, because the Bank of Japan is buying them. The BoJ can control the market. When you issue bonds in your own currency, as the Japanese can do, you have the luxury of owning your own printing press. That means you don’t have to fear the bond vigilantes, they just don’t exist. They are a myth, an invention by economists to scare governments. A central bank, if it chooses, can have any interest rate at the long and short end of the curve. If they buy bonds ad nauseam, no one can stop them.

What do you think of high yield bonds?

In a world that is yield starved, people forget that it is not yield one should worry about, but total return. The problem with low-yielding high yield bonds is when we get a default cycle, you know you will get hit. We all creep out of the yield curve, but we forget that we are not getting compensated for the risk of default. The total return expectation for owning high yield bonds today is negative. Why on Earth would I want to own that stuff? People are blinded by zero returns in cash, so they pile into high yield. The only way it would only be about the yield is if you think that you can get out before all the others. Which of course is impossible in aggregate and therefore not a viable strategy.

So what’s your most impoartant advice to investors now?

Be patient. Don’t take it from me, take it from Winnie the Pooh: Never underestimate the value of doing nothing. Never forget: You can’t know the future. Hold a lot of dry powder now. 50% of our portfolio today is in cash or some form of short term bond holdings. If we do get a dislocation in equity markets, we will have the ability and deploy that dry powder. That’s the time to buy.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1ygBqOp Tyler Durden

Loss of Trust in Government Leads to Power Swings


Trust in Government infographic

Reason’s annual Webathon is underway! Your
(tax-deductible!) gift will
help 
Reason magazine, Reason.com,
and Reason TV bring the case for “Free Minds and Free Markets” to
bigger and bigger audiences. For giving levels and associated
swag, 
go
here now
. 

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1vN5Oh4
via IFTTT

Eric Garner’s Killer Evades Indictment, Cops Not Actually Investigating UVA Rape Allegations Yet, ‘Gangnam Style’ Breaks the Youtube: P.M. Links

  • Gangnam StyleA grand jury
    declined
    to indict the NYPD officer who put single-cigarette
    salesman Eric Garner in a chokehold, leading to the man’s death.
    Though a coroner had ruled the death a homicide, it’s not obvious
    what kind of charges prosecutors asked the jury to consider.
  • The University of Virginia gang rape story published by
    Rolling Stone is now facing all kinds of criticism. But it
    seems the local police aren’t actually
    doing much
    about it yet.
  • Denver high school students
    walked out of class
    to protest Ferguson.
  • The appointment of soap opera producer Colleen Bradley Bell to
    be U.S. ambassador to Hungary has annoyed a lot of people,
    including Reason’s favorite curmudgeon,
    John McCain
    .
  • “Gangnam Style”
    just broke
    Youtube’s view counter. Let’s all do the dance in
    celebration.
  • Will Hillary run? Politico says
    it’s not clear
    , and an announcement might be a long way
    off.

Reason’s annual Webathon is underway! Your
(tax-deductible!) gift will
help 
Reason magazine,
Reason.com, and Reason TV bring the case for “Free Minds and Free
Markets” to bigger and bigger audiences. For giving levels and
associated swag, go
here now
.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1FPnrQz
via IFTTT

Another Day, Another Epic Gold(Miner) Slamdown

Presented with nothing but admiration for the arrogance of manipulators…

 

Because nothing says fiduciary duty or best-execution like a 2-second dump of 1.25 million shares of Gold Miners (driving prices down $2)

 

Sell Mortimer Sell…

 

and close-up thanks to Nanex… a perfect dump to the LULD circuit breaker levels!!!!

Just like AAPL…

So that’s it – how to trade US equity markets, trail bids 10% below every tick and offers 10% above (or whatever the circuit-breaker LULD barriers are in your market – and hey presto, instant money…




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1zRRVxk Tyler Durden

Stocks Up, Bonds Up, USDollar Up, Gold Up, Oil Up Ahead Of Draghi’s Possible Let-Down

An utter VIXnado (below 12.25 in the last 30 mins) sparked a late-day buying panic in stocks ahead of tomorrow's all-hopeful ECB meeting (because nothing makes more sense than lifting all protection ahead of a potentially massive market event) although the last few minutes closed weak. On the day high beta Trannies (despite higher oil) and Small Caps surged once again (as the market ignored PMI and ADP and loved ISM) as Monday's 'excessive' selling of "most shorted" names has been face-ripped back the last 2 days. Treasury yields at the long-end fell back today after 2 days higher (with 30Y back below 3.0%) but <7Y were 0-2bps higher. The dollar roseonce again as EUR dropped to 1.2301 (-17 handles from Draghi's first hint). Depsite USD strength, gold (over $1210) and oil (over $67) pushed higher but silver and copper slipped. In summary, buy back all your hedges, buy stocks, buy bonds, buy dollars, buy gold, buy oil, bye bye sanity.

 

 

"Most Shorted" stocks have been squeeze at both opens today and yesterday…

 

We hope everyone enjoyed today's efficient market algo freakiness around munchtime….

As VIX was monkey-hammered lower today… (because nothing makes more sense than lifting all protection ahead of a potentially massive market event) but coul dnot sustain it into the close

 

 

Which pushed stocks to record-er highs (for Dow and S&P) with s weak close

 

and Trannies and Small Caps higher on the week

 

Treasury yields fell today (bonds were bought)

 

As The Dollar surged once again (on EUR weakness ahead of tomorrow)

 

EURUSD down 17 handles since Draghi hinted at QE… at 1.2301

 

Despite USD Strength, oil and gold gained on the day (silver and copper did not) but since OPEC's initial leak, oil is down around 12% and Gold up around 1%

 

Charts: Bloomberg

 




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1zRRQKc Tyler Durden