Remember, the Sharpest Rallies Occur During BEAR Markets.

Looks like this rally has ended.

The S&P 500 has run into the downward sloping trnedline set by the 2015 top. It has since rolled over. We’re likely heading down in a big way.

Investors forget, the sharpest, most aggressive rallies occur during bear markets.  This is because bear market rallies are driven by short-covering: those investors who went short are forced to “cover” or buy back shares they have sold previously.

Consider the Tech Bubble.

Once the top was in, stocks stage SIX separate rallies ranging in size from 15% to 27%. And ALL of these massive moves took place in roughly than one year’s time.

That’s six double-digit rallies, some of which lasted as long as two months… but all of which ended in stocks making new lows.

Virtually the same thing happened after the 2007 top, with stocks staging four significant rallies ranging from 7% to 12.5% as they ground their way lower going into the Crash.

Even after the Crash hit, we had a monster 25% rally that lasted two months!

My point with all of this is that sharp rallies occur during bear markets after major market peaks are formed. I suspect this latest rally will prove to be yet another example as stocks roll over and head to new lows.

The time to prepare for this is now, BEFORE it hits.

If you’ve yet to prepare for a bear market in stocks we just published a 21-page investment report titled Stock Market Crash Survival Guide.

In it, we outline precisely how the crash will unfold as well as which investments will perform best during a stock market crash.

We are giving away just 100 copies for FREE to the public.

To pick up yours, swing by:

http://ift.tt/1HW1LSz

Best Regards

Graham Summers

Chief Market Strategist

Phoenix Capital Research

 

 


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1SNCPUc Phoenix Capital Research

Head Of “Transparency International” In Chile Resigns After “Panama Papers” Revelations

Define irony.

While the global media has been almost entirely focused on the “circle of close Putin friends” who have emerged as some of Mossack Fonseca’s clients, and moments ago the Panama Papers even had their first official casualty when the Iceland prime minister resigned, far more amusing examples of “shell firm” perpetrators have emerged, if deep under the radar.

As Reuters reports with barely a trace of humor, the president of the Chilean branch of Transparency International resigned on Monday after documents from a Panamanian law firm showed he was linked to at least five offshore companies.

For those who are unfamiliar, Transparency International is a German-based organization that seeks to monitor and root out corporate and political corruption worldwide.

Awkward.

Perhaps he should have used Bill Clinton to get the definition of the word “transparency”?

 

As much as he would have wanted not to, ultimately he had no choice: “Gonzalo Delaveau presented his resignation as the president of Transparency Chile, which has been accepted by the board of directors,” the national body wrote on Twitter.

The reason for his resignation is that Delaveau’s name was among the tens of thousands of people (most non-US) that were exposed in the Mossack Fonseca leak. 

While Delaveau is not accused of illegal activity, the leaks called into question his post at Transparency International.

According to CIPER, Delaveau, a lawyer, acts as a representative for Turnbrook Corporation, DK Corporation, Heatlhey International Inc, Turnbrook Mining Ltd and Vizcachitas Ltd, all of which are domiciled in the Bahamas. Delaveau also serves as a director for Turnbrook Mining, which owns 51.6 percent of Los Andes Copper, a Canadian exploration and development company currently focused on a mine project north of Chile’s capital, Santiago.

Reuters adds that in response to questions from CIPER, he said he was a director only at Turnbrook Mining and that his relations with the other companies were consistent with his role as a lawyer and legal clerk. He added in an interview with a local radio station that he was “extremely surprised” by the “gray, dark area” of Mossack Fonseca.

We would be too.

Delaveau’s resignation came hours after Chile’s tax authority announced the beginning of an “intense follow-up” of the Chileans mentioned in the Panama Papers, who range from ex-soccer stars to newspaper magnates.

The disclosures come as Chile deals with political and corporate corruption scandals that have left Chileans angry with the entire professional class and eroded the government’s popularity.

Sounds very much like the US.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1SyhJH0 Tyler Durden

Is Market Breadth Beginning To Sour?

Via Dana Lyons' Tumblr,

Despite positive action in the major averages, market breadth has very recently begun to lag.

One of the hallmarks of the post-February stock market rally has been the superb breadth. That stood in stark contrast to the internal deterioration that had been in effect since about a year ago. This recent strong breadth dynamic has finally shown signs of potentially waning, however. One of the first signs we noticed was the new 7-year low in the ratio of micro-caps to large caps about a week ago. And we saw another piece of evidence pointing to breadth potentially starting to lag again last Friday, April 1.

The major averages scored new rally highs yet again on Friday as the Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 100 points, the Nasdaq 100 was up 1% and the S&P 500 was higher by almost 2/3 of a percent. Despite that appearance of strength, in what was seemingly an April Fool’s joke, NYSE breadth was actually negative on the day (i.e., there were more declining issues than advancing issues). Now it is only one day so we wouldn’t make too much of it unless it becomes a larger trend. Furthermore, it was the first day of the month and quarter so there may have been some seasonal structural forces at work as well. However, it was unusual to see negative breadth on such a seemingly positive day in the market.

For example, in the past 50 years, it was only the 24th day that the S&P 500 gained at least 0.6% when within 3% of a 52-week high – and yet NYSE breadth was negative.

 

image

 

As the chart reveals, the previous 23 events occurred in both secular bull and bear markets. Therefore, while the sample size is on the small side, to the extent that there is any consistency to the performance measures following those events, they are probably more robust. As it happens, returns in the shorter-term have been fairly consistent – to the downside.

image

As the table shows, 16 of the 23 occurrences showed the S&P 500 lower from 2 days to 2 weeks following. Furthermore, even out to 3 months, the median return was almost -3%. Again, the sample size is small but it includes several occurrences during the secular bull market of the 1980′s-1990′s. In fact, even after a number of the occurrences during very strong advances in 1986 and 1999, the S&P 500 was some 6% lower 3 months later.

The rally since February has done very little “wrong” in terms of its quality of advance. Sure, many folks would have liked to have seen more volume accompanying the move. Furthermore, the broader indices are still a long ways from not only their all-time highs of last spring, but even from making higher highs above the peaks in late 2015. However, in terms of the pace of advance and the breadth measures involved, there has been little to complain about.

As the major averages are now pushing up against either their 2015 tops or the downtrends connecting those tops, it is perhaps not surprising to see the first signs of struggle in this rally. We have pointed out some preliminary evidence of complacent or overly bullish sentiment, at least on a short-term basis. Now, we are beginning to see the until-now stellar rally breadth begin to show cracks. Once again, we’ll emphasize that this is very preliminary evidence. A more substantial negative reversal in breadth is far from certain at this point and the burden of proof is on the bears to do more extensive technical damage to this uptrend.

However, for the first time since mid-February, the breadth situation is not looking quite as sweet as it was.

*  *  *

More from Dana Lyons, JLFMI and My401kPro.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1qo6yu5 Tyler Durden

Atlanta Fed Q1 GDP Estimate Crashes To 0.4%

Following this morning’s disappointing trade data (but… but… surveys showed that the workers in the service sector are more optimistic… just ignore the actual hard data) we asked if today’s Atlanta Fed GDP update would be above or below 0.3%.

Moments ago we got the answer: it was over, but by the smallest possible increment. And the answer is….

The GDPNow model forecast for real GDP growth (seasonally adjusted annual rate) in the first quarter of 2016 is 0.4 percent on April 5, down from 0.7 percent on April 1. After yesterday morning’s light vehicle sales release from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis and the manufacturing report from the U.S. Bureau of the Census, the forecast for real GDP growth declined from 0.7 percent to 0.4 percent due to declines in the forecasts for real consumer spending growth and real equipment investment growth. The forecast for real GDP growth remained at 0.4 percent after this morning’s international trade report from the U.S. Census Bureau, as a slight decline in the forecast for real net exports was offset by a slight increase in the forecast of real equipment investment growth.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/229M2ZE Tyler Durden

President Obama Explains Why The Land-Of-The-Free Will Ban Tax ‘Inversions’ – Live Feed

Thanks to an ever-increasing need for tax revenues to fund an ever-increasing horde of government-handout-beneficiaries, the populist-in-chief has once again taken aim at tax inversions for the crusade-du-jour. We look forward to him explaining how this is different (and better for American jobs) from what Donald Trump has suggested.

As AP reports,

President Barack Obama will speak from the White House about new rules aimed at deterring "tax inversions."

 

The White House says Obama will speak at 12:15 p.m. in the Brady Press Briefing Room. His remarks come a day after the Treasury Department announced a package of steps designed to make inversions less financially appealing.

 

Tax inversions occur when companies move abroad for lower tax rates. The use of inversions has sparked a political outcry.

 

Obama supports new legislation to reform corporate taxes, and several Democrats have announced bills to make it harder for U.S. corporations to invert. But prospects for passing such legislation in an election year appear low given wide differences between Democrats and Republicans on taxes.

 

Obama's statement also comes amid an uproar over publication of thousands of names of rich and powerful people who conducted offshore financial dealings through a Panamanian law firm. Obama has yet to address those disclosures publicly.

Live Feed (due to start at 1215ET)


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1MbfLje Tyler Durden

Iceland PM Resigns Over “Panama Papers” Leaks

We suspect more than a few ‘prosecuted’ bankers will be smiling wryly today as, following the exposure of his offshore financial dealings – revealed in the Panama Papers – Iceland’s embattled Prime Minister Sigmundur David Gunlaugsson has resigned.

 

Despite earlier refusal to step down, the decision, which was reported by national broadcaster RUV, followed street protests that attracted thousands of Icelanders angered by the alleged tax evasion.

The FT reports that

  • ICELAND FISHERIES AND AGRICULTURE MINISTER SIGURDUR INGI JOHANSSON WILL BECOME PRIME MINISTER


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/229JwTf Tyler Durden

Yen Carry Trade Snaps After 4 Week Bill Prices Deep Below Fed Funds

Moments ago the US Treasury priced its 4 Week Bill auction, which was unique in that at just $35 billion, was not only $10 billion lower than a month ago, but was the lowest since October 15.

This may or may not explain why after last week’s curious auction yield of 0.20%, or 5 bps below the effective Fed Funds floor, today’s auction showed an even more dramatic scramble for short term liquidity, when the government sold 4 Week Bills at a rate of 0.185%, or 6.5 bps below the rate charged by the Fed!

 

 

Clearly some correlation algo in the market did not expect this because the moment the auction results were released, the USDJPY snapped lower to fresh 14 months lows, just above 110, from where it is only downhill.

 

The move in the USDJPY has in turn pressured stocks and all risk assets, as suddenly there appears to be a rather pronounced flight to safety and/or a fault with the Fed’s plumbing as primary dealers are willing to lock up funds with the Treasury for 4 week at a rate lower than the Fed Funds, something which shouldn’t technically be happening, and suggests the market is once again forcing the Fed to cut rates.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1MQjrqA Tyler Durden

Millionaires Are Fleeing Paris, Athens, and … Chicago

YachtNobody has the ability to vote with his feet like an extremely wealthy person. New World Wealth, a South Africa-based research group that provides statistical information about the behavior of rich people around the world, released a new report that shows how that vote turned out in 2015, looking at which countries and cities are losing millionaires, and to which countries and cities they are moving.

The big winner is Australia. Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth all ranked among the top cities that have been drawing in millionaires. According to the report, wealthy folks are moving to Australia from other countries like China, the United Kingdom, South Africa, and even the United States. Other big winners are Dubai, Tel Aviv, and Vancouver. In America, big winners were San Francisco and Seattle.

So who were the losers, then? The cities with the biggest outflow of millionaires, were Paris, Rome, Athens, and as the headline spoiled, Chicago. Chicago lost an estimated 3,000 millionaires last year, actually a larger flat number than Athens, which lost about 2,000 (though given Greece’s overall situation, they’ve probably been bleeding millionaires for several years now). Chicago is the only American city the study identifies as losing millionaires. America as a whole gained 7,000 new millionaires last year through migration, second only to Australia in the study.  

In fact, according to this study, Chicago lost more millionaires than entire countries like Russia, Spain, and Brazil last year, but then again, just as with Athens, these countries have likely been seeing millionaires migrating out for some time.

As for the reasons why the flight from Chicago, the study gets a little vague. They interview wealthy people to put this report together, and they were told “rising racial tensions, rising crime levels” as major considerations. I would have loved to have seen a poll that had these millionaires rank their concerns so we could get a much fuller sense of what is happening. While it’s true Chicago is seeing racial tensions and a jump in crime, the city and the state of Illinois are also seeing significant economic problems, massive debts, and tax issues, and it would have been helpful to see where that all fit into considerations. San Francisco and Seattle are not exactly metropolises with low tax rates, but clearly what they do offer the wealthy offsets the costs.

Chicago and Illinois aren’t just bleeding its wealthiest citizens. As we recently noted, Illinois is one of the few states losing population as America grows. Note the Chicago emigration numbers from the census report: Chicago saw a net loss of 6,263 residents for the 12 months measured (encompassing parts of 2015 and 2016). If New World Wealth’s report is accurate, that means about half of the people Chicago lost were millionaires. If New World Wealth is going by the region and not just the city, then we see a quarter of the people leaving as millionaires.

As the report notes, when a city or country is bleeding millionaires like this it should be taken as a major warning sign: “Millionaires are often the first people to leave. They have the means to leave, unlike middle class citizens.” And those millionaires are the ones that public employees want to turn to fix their pension crisis and the state’s massive economic problems. Thousands of them just said “no thanks.”

Read the full New World Wealth report here

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/25J2x3B
via IFTTT

Puerto Rico Bonds Plunge After Senate Passes Debt Moratorium Bill

The ongoing feud between Puerto Rico and its mostly hedge fund creditors is promptly shaping up as the next “Argentina”, where “vulture investors” may well end up holding the island commonwealth hostage for years, during which time, however, they won’t get paid.

This is shaping up as the latest development in the saga in which earlier today Puerto Rico’s Senate approved a bill calling for a moratorium on a wide range of debt payments, including general-obligation bonds, through January 2017 in what Bloomberg dubbed “the latest escalation of the Caribbean island’s fiscal crisis.”

The measure, passed around 2:30 a.m. local time, would allow Governor Alejandro Garcia Padilla to suspend payments on debt backed by the government, the island’s Government Development Bank and other public agencies, according to a copy of the legislation obtained by Bloomberg. That includes the Sales Tax Financing Corp., known by its Spanish acronym Cofina. A default on those obligations would be a first for Puerto Rico, which so far has only failed to pay on bonds backed by legislative appropriation and rum taxes.

The bill has yet to be enacted: it remains to be reviewed by the island’s House of Representatives on Tuesday after stalling there previously. It’s the culmination of months of posturing by commonwealth officials and bondholders since Garcia Padilla declared that Puerto Rico’s debts were unpayable in June 2015. It reflects the governor’s long-held position that the island can’t continue to pay creditors on time – even those holding constitutionally guaranteed securities – while still providing essential services to residents.

Today’s latest gambit follows a February proposal by Puerto Rico which to repay creditors (who are owed a total of $70 billion) to the tune of 54 cents on the dollar, a move which we then dubbed “Puerto Rico’s opening salvo in what’s likely to be protracted battle to tackle the entire debt burden.”

The proposal then looked as follows:

Back then Puerto Rico proposed to offer “growth bonds” designed to make up for the losses. However, the payout on those securities will be tied to the island’s economy and as you might recall, things aren’t going so well. The following table from Moody’s Analytics provided some sense on how valuable these “growth bonds” would be:


As Daniel Henson, an analyst at Height Securities warned then, “Puerto Rico debt restructuring proposal isn’t credible. The targets are “wholly unrealistic,” and require creditors to trust Puerto Rico will make good faith effort to repay them.”

Fast forward to today’s escalation when the same Daniel Henson chimes in again:“We continue to believe there are political constraints on the consummation of a debt moratorium that impairs GO bonds, and, indeed, such an arrangement would appear to us to be wildly out of step with any reading of the local constitution. The reality is that Puerto Rico is an American jurisdiction, and its laws are not at the whims of political appetite.”

However, as of 2:30am local they are, if only for the time being.

As Bloomberg details, non-constitutionally protected bond payments would be suspended immediately under the proposal, while those backed by the constitution would be halted starting July 1, when Puerto Rico owes $805 million on its general obligations. The bill would also prevent creditors from suing the commonwealth for defaulting through January 2017, the same as the moratorium period.

The bond market was not enthused: general obligations with an 8% coupon and maturing 2035 traded Tuesday at an average price of 66 cents on the dollar, the lowest since the bonds were first sold in 2014, data compiled by Bloomberg show. The average yield was 12.8 percent.

 

As is known from previous coverage of the Puerto Rico debt crisis, investors holding general obligations had already been working with island lawmakers, excluding the governor, to come to a consensual plan, Andy Rosenberg, a lawyer at Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton and Garrison, said in a statement. He represents a group of general-obligation bondholders in their negotiations with Puerto Rico and other creditor groups.

Bloomberg adds that lawmakers are considering separate legislation that would suspend principal payments on general-obligation debt for five years, while still paying interest during that time, according to a House lawmaker who asked for anonymity because the talks are private. The measure wouldn’t reduce the face value of the securities, the person said. Puerto Rico has about $13 billion of general-obligation debt.

There is more.

The legislation also addresses the GDB, which is facing speculation that it’ll lapse into insolvency. The bank’s receivership process, liquidity and reserve requirements and payment obligations would be suspended indefinitely, according to Hanson. The bill seeks to split the entity into a “good bank” and “bad bank,” he said.

Hedge funds holding debt in the GDB sued on Monday to stop the bank from returning deposits to local government agencies as it faces a growing cash shortage. The funds, which include affiliates of Brigade Capital Management, Claren Road Asset Management and Solus Alternative Asset Management, accused the bank of seeking to “prop up” local agencies at the expense of other creditors. The GDB has a $422 million debt-service payment due May 1.

The Government Development Bank serves the dual purpose of providing financial support to local governments and acting as a financial adviser to the commonwealth. The funds, which say they hold a “substantial amount” of almost $3.75 billion in the bank’s outstanding debt, blamed the entity’s deteriorating condition on a “hopeless conflict” between loyalties to Puerto Rico and to creditors.

In short: the situation is getting messier by the day with a compromise deal now seemingly impossible – absent a US government bailout – and meanwhile Puerto Rico’s money is running out, which will ultimately be the decisive catalyst that leads to the next step in the crisis.

Puerto Rico’s bondholders responded moments ago, and they are not happy:

“The governor has spent the last nine months rebuffing all overtures by the GO holders,” Rosenberg said in the statement. The deal proposed by investors “would give Puerto Rico additional liquidity by, among other things, deferring substantial principal payments. Most importantly, this consensual deal avoids a July 1 default on constitutional debt.”


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1RCdhKU Tyler Durden

Deutsche Bank Dead-Cat-Bounce Dies As Bund Yields Collapse Near Record Lows

We're gonna need a bigger bailout…

Just when you thought it was safe to catch a falling knife and that all the systemic fears in the world had been washed away by coordinated central bank manipulation, this happens…

 

Deutsche Bank stock price is retesting record lows as – just like Lehman – all the soothing words merely enabled a dead-cat-bounce to let some 'insiders' out with less pain.

As Deutsche itself notes: What explains the weakness in banks?

Banks’ performance has been significantly weaker than the relationship with credit spreads would have suggested.

 

As a consequence, the relative P/E has dropped to the lowest level since 2000, while the P/B, at a 60% discount to the market, implies relative RoEs to fall back below the 2008 trough. The main explanation for banks’ underperformance is the sharp decline in 10-year Bund yields, with the resulting flattening of the yield curve putting further pressure on net interest margins.

 

 

The current level of the oil price points to upside for inflation expectations and, hence, bond yields.

 

Yet, while excessively bearish valuation levels and the scope for higher bond yields points to upside, we are nonetheless cautious on the outlook for banks, given downside risks for the credit market.

And since the easing jawboning stopped and the EU yield curve collapsed, EU banks have plunged back near record lows…

 


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1RCbzt5 Tyler Durden