Secret Service Is Dealing With Over 12,000 Tweets Calling For Trump’s Assassination

As Silicon Valley’s tech billionaires continue their crack down on “fake news”, “hate speech” and dissenting conservative opinions of all forms (see this from last night: “Reddit Bans Three Alt-Right Forums As Users Blast ‘Leftist Intolerance’“), one thing they don’t seem to be that worried about is death threats to the President of the United States.  In fact, just a quick search of Twitter reveals 1,000s of tweets calling for the assassination of Trump.

 

But while Twitter and Facebook may be distracted with censoring conservative opinions under the guise of a crack down on “fake news” and/or “hate speech”, as Heather Lowrey of Louisville, Kentucky recently discovered, the U.S. Secret Service is taking social media threats against the President very seriously.  Per the Courier-Journal:

The U.S. Secret Service field office in Louisville is still investigating the tweet sent by Heather Lowrey, according to special agent Richard Ferretti. It said, “If someone was cruel enough to assassinate MLK, maybe someone will be kind enough to assassinate Trump. #bekind #trump #lovetrumpshate,” according to a screenshot provided to the Courier-Journal.

 

Lowrey could have violated United States Code Title 18, Section 871, “Threats Against President and Successors to the Presidency,” which prohibits knowingly and willfully mailing or otherwise making “any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States.” The charge, a Class E felony, is punishable by at least one year in prison and a maximum of five years.

 

“Think twice before they send it out,” he said. “We are definitely monitoring social media.”

Ironically, Heather signed her tweet calling for the assassination of the President with #bekind and #lovetrumpshate.

Trump Tweet

 

Meanwhile, 24 year old Zachary Benson of Cleveland found himself in a jail cell shortly after his election night tweet storm.  Per the New York Daily News:

 A suburban Cleveland man who tweeted that his “life goal is to assassinate Trump” was charged with making threats on the president-elect, the feds said.

 

Zachary Benson, 24, also tweeted “F—ing fools. I hate you all” just as election returns assuring Donald Trump’s victory hit national airwaves, according to a criminal complaint unsealed Monday and obtained by WKYC-TV. Investigators said he was later apologetic about the tweets.

 

“Diplomacy. F—ing fools. I hate you all. I want to bomb every one of your voting booths and your general areas,” Benson tweeted at 1:25 a.m. on Nov. 9, according to investigators.

 

“My life goal is to assassinate Trump,” he tweeted 17 minutes later, the complaint showed. “Don’t care if I serve infinite sentences. That man deserves to decease existing.”

Ohio Tweet

 

As Mashable points out, in the 12 days since Trump’s inauguration, approximately 12,000 tweets have gone out calling for his assassination.  And while the U.S. Secret Service can’t possibly follow up on the threats of that many disaffected snowflakes, people who have a history of criminal activity and/or those who make several threats should probably expect a knock on their door. 

Former U.S. Secret Service special agent Tim Franklin, who is now a criminology and criminal justice professor of counterterrorism and cybercrimes at Arizona State University, said in a phone call Tuesday that “it’s the people who have a true and genuine intent to do harm that the Secret Service is worried about.”

 

That’s why one-off posts and people with no record of threatening messages tend to get passed over. He said the Secret Service is looking out for trends and consistent behavior, like the person who repeats their intent to kill the president over time. If someone has made threats in the past they are more likely to get investigated when they post another “Kill Trump”
post.

 

“They’re not going to to beat down the door of everybody who makes a negative Twitter comment,” Franklin said, which may be a relief to anyone who tweeted an off-hand and not entirely serious death wish for the new president.

 

But for users who use certain language and specific details about the president, his location and how the assassination will happen, the Secret Service will likely take notice.

And while Twitter and Facebook have explicit rules prohibiting “threats of violence”, thousands of Trump threats seemingly slip through the crack every day.

On the platform side, Facebook and Twitter have policies in place to take down threatening posts. As Twitter said in an email statement, “The Twitter Rules prohibit threats of violence, and we will suspend accounts violating that policy.” Facebook similarly said under their “credible threats policy” they remove posts showing intent to kill the president.

 

Yet thousands of posts that use the words “kill” and “assassinate” remain up — most of them targeting the president no less. The platforms can’t seem to keep up with the influx of death threats and don’t seem to be upholding their own policies as strictly as they would like.

But, we can certainly understand that Facebook and Twitter have a hard time keeping up with enforcing their own policies…censoring “fake news”, a.k.a. anything that is overly critical of Hillary Clinton, really is a full-time job.

via http://ift.tt/2kBUZ2O Tyler Durden

Why the Government’s Legal Assault on Backpage.com Backfired (New Reason Podcast)

The CEO of the Amsterdam-based Backpage.com—the “world’s largest online brothel”—was arrested at the Houston airport on October 6, 2016, charged by the state of California with pimping, conspiracy, pimping of a minor, and attempted pimping of a minor.

Two months later, Sacramento County Superior Court Judge Michael Bowman threw out the government’s case on the grounds that the law protects online platforms from criminal liability for user-generated content. “Congress has spoken on this matter,” Bowman wrote in a preliminary decision citing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA). “[A]nd it is for Congress, not this court, to revisit.”

The prosector in that case, state’s attorney general (and now junior senator from California) Kamala Harris immediately filed new criminal charges against Backpage. Last month, the company decided to close its adult ads section after years of legal harassment.

On today’s podcast, our guest is legendary free speech attorney Robert Corn-Revere, who represented Backpage.com. The conversation touched on the history of the Communications Decency Act, why Backpage’s move to close of its adult ads section has made it more difficult for law enforcement to catch sex traffickers, how Anthony Comstock “set the playbook” for today’s censors, and what Trump’s election means for the First Amendment. (Note: The conversation was recorded on January 17, before the nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.)

Read Elizabeth Nolan Brown’s coverage of Backpage.com’s legal troubles.

Click below to listen to the conversation—or subscribe to our podcast at iTunes.

Don’t miss a single Reason podcast or video! Subscribe, rate, and review!

Follow us at Soundcloud.

Subscribe to our video channel at iTunes.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Like us on Facebook.

Follow us on Twitter.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2kye3PT
via IFTTT

Louvre Terror Attack Suspect Identified As 29-Year-Old Egyptian-Born UAE Resident

Following up on this morning latest terrorist attack in Paris, in which a terrorist suspect attacked soldiers with a machete near the Louvre art gallery in Paris, Reuters reports that according to a French prosecutor, the assailant has been identified as Abdullah Reda al-Hamamy, a 29-year-old Egyptian born in Dakahlia, a province northeast of Cairo, who was living in the United Arab Emirates.

Michel Cadot, the head of Paris police, said the man was shouting “Allahu Akbar” and injured the soldier’s scalp before being shot at.  He confirmed that the attack was being treated as a terrorist incident but they were still trying to determine whether he was acting alone or under instruction.

AP adds that according to prosecutor Francois Molins the French soldiers’ quick reactions put an end to “a terror attack” Friday morning at one of Paris’ most iconic tourist attractions. He says “everything shows that the assailant was very determined.” He added that the attacker, who was shot by the soldiers, is in a life-threatening condition in a hospital.

Photo taken by a tourist with a mobile phone shows a soldier opening fire at a
man in the Louvre Museum

Molins said the attacker had no identity papers but investigators used his cellphone to find out that he was a resident in the United Arab Emirates who came to Paris on a tourist visa on Jan. 26. Two days later he bought two military machetes at a gun store in Paris.

AP also adds that several police raids are underway in the French capital. A police union official, Luc Poignant, said one of the raids took place on Rue de Ponthieu, a street near the Champs-Elysees Avenue, the city’s famed boulevard.

As we reported on Friday morning, a man attacked French soldiers on Friday morning near the Louvre, and they shot him while other security forces locked down the famous museum. He has been hospitalized and the French president says he will be questioned “when it is possible to do so.”

Following the attack on Friday morning US President Donald Trump cited it as justification for his controversial ban on citizens from seven Muslim-majority countries entering the US – but neither Egypt or Dubai are on Mr Trump’s list of banned countries. It is unknown at this moment if Trump will expand the list to include these two countries upon learning of the suspect’s origins.

via http://ift.tt/2k5fmST Tyler Durden

Left Mocks Trump for Frederick Douglass Ignorance, Then Disses Douglass by Celebrating Attacks on Free Speech: New at Reason

Frederick Douglass was an ardent defender of free speech, a principle dismissed by Berkeley protesters and rioters and their apologists.

Brendan O’Neill writes:

This week the leftish Twittersphere and liberal comment sites went wild for two stories. The first, that President Donald Trump doesn’t seem to know who Frederick Douglass was. The second, that those Berkeley students and non-Berkeley anarchists who shut down the Milo Yiannaopolous meeting might not have done such a bad thing. Okay, a mob silenced Milo, people tweeted and intoned, but perhaps that’s okay in the anti-Trump fightback.

It’s almost unbearably ironic. Because if these critics of Trump themselves knew anything about Douglass, they’d know he was implacably opposed to using mob pressure to shut down public meetings. They’d know he valued free speech so highly, above all other values, that he thought no one should ever be “overawed by force” simply for what he thinks and says. Imagine: in one breath mocking Trump for not knowing who Douglass was, and in the next saying things that will have made Douglass spin in his grave.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2jMdqxs
via IFTTT

Weekend Reading: And… It’s Only Week Two

Submitted by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

As we conclude week two of the new Presidential cycle, it certainly has not been dull.

The markets have started struggling with an Administration which is hanging up on heads of state, threatening to send troops to Mexico, discussing border taxes and thinking about doubling the required wages for HB-1 visas. Of course, those issues are still currently offset by hopes for a sea of infrastructure spending, tax cuts and reform and an increase in jobs and wages.

The “hope” is most clearly seen in the sentiment surveys, but remains elusive in the “hard data.” As noted recently by Charlie McElligott via RBC:

“The US data has been running at such a clip, as a matter of fact, it’s an increasingly (and massively rhetorical) popular question asked by clients: when do analyst / strategist expectations begin to overshoot?

 

Tied-into this, the Bloomberg ‘econ surprise’ series gives an interesting breakout of the drivers of the directional data surprises, and it crystalizes one ‘area’ that Mark Orlsey and I have been paying a lot of attention to with regards to where the largest ‘beats’ are coming from.

 

The economic surveys and ‘animal spirits’ indicators have been ‘en fuego’ (see Friday’s U Mich Confidence printing highs since 2003!), and the chart below captures just how much of the ‘surprise index’ upside that surveys have been dictating – it’s visually stunning, and reiterates that ‘rubber needs to meet road’ in coming months.

We can see this more real time by looking at the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) which is arguably one of the more important economic indicators. The index is a composite made up of 85 subcomponents which give a broad overview of overall economic activity in the U.S. However, unlike backward-looking statistics like GDP, the CFNAI is a forward-looking metric that gives some indication of how the economy is likely to look in the coming months.  Importantly, understanding the message the index is designed to deliver is critical.  From the Chicago Fed website:

“The Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) is a monthly index designed to gauge overall economic activity and related inflationary pressure.  A zero value for the index indicates that the national economy is expanding at its historical trend rate of growth; negative values indicate below-average growth, and positive values indicate above-average growth.

The overall index is broken down into four major sub-categories which cover:

  • Production & Income
  • Employment, Unemployment & Hours
  • Personal Consumption & Housing
  • Sales, Orders & Inventories

Here is my point. While “exuberance” in terms of “attitudes” is surging, actual activity remains quite subdued. The first chart compares my combined consumer confidence composite to the CFNAI.

The next chart is the dispersion of the components of the CFNAI also compared to consumer “confidence.”

In both instances there is a wide deviation between “attitude” and “activity.” More importantly, “attitudes” have typically reverted back to “activity” rather than the other way around. 

This potentially leaves the market set up for disappointment in the months ahead. Be careful.

In them meantime, here is what I am reading this weekend as I put my “Dow 20,000” hat back in the drawer for now.


Trump/Economy


Markets/Fed


Favorite / Interesting Reads


“Bubbles Are Invisible To Those Inside The Bubble.” -? Jim Dines

via http://ift.tt/2l1nY0M Tyler Durden

Disappointing Wages Spark Biggest Market Rally Of The Year

Bad news is good news again…

 

US Macro Surprises continue to disappoint…

 

And to be clear – all the gains in macro data have been 'soft' survey gains with 'hard' real data completely unchanged…

 

But bad news is great news and stocks had their best day of the year… Dow back above 20,000…

 

Stocks managed to scramble back to green on the week (Dow and Trannies red)…Small Caps squeezed to best of the week

 

On another big short squeeze…

 

VIX was crushed back to a 10 handle – after all it was a payrolls day and you always buy the fucking payrolls day dip…

 

Led by banks surging on Dodd-Frank repeal executive orders…

Goldman and JPMorgan accounted for half of The Dow's gains today.

But it was an ugly week for FANG stocks…

 

And Energy stocks were the worst on the week…

 

Weak jobs data was trumped by Fed speak today to ramp yields back higher (30Y notable underperformer)…

 

The 2s30s Treasury yield curve steepened dramatically this week (post-Fed, post-payrolls) to its steepest since December…

 

But as we noted earlier, real yields have erased all the trumpflation gains…

 

The USD Index fell for the 6th week in a row (every week in 2017) – and this week was the worst for the greenback since July 29th… falling to 2-month lows

 

The USD Index rallied back into the green briefly today thanks to a comment from The Fed's Williams but ended lower…

 

As the dollar dropped on the week, Bitcoin rallied during China's Golden Week… back above $1000.

 

Gold also gained (up 5th of last 6 weeks), closing at its highest weekly close since the election…

 

Copper had its worst week of the year as gold won… Gold had its best week since April 2016

 

Just one thing…

via http://ift.tt/2l6cp4u Tyler Durden

Kellyanne Conway Admits Bowling Green Massacre Mistake, Chelsea Clinton Gets ‘Edgy’: P.M. Links

  • ConwayIn a rare example of a Trump administration person admitting something they said was false, Kellyanne Conway conceded that the Bowling Green Massacre never happened. She called it “an honest mistake.”
  • Read my column at The Daily Beast on why Steve Bannon and President Trump welcome the kind of violence that prevented Milo Yiannopoulos from speaking at Berkeley.
  • “Liberty is meaningless where the right to utter one’s thoughts and opinions has ceased to exist. That, of all rights, is the dread of tyrants. It is the right which they first of all strike down. They know its power. Thrones, dominions, principalities, and powers, founded in injustice and wrong, are sure to tremble, if men are allowed to reason of righteousness, temperance, and of a judgment to come in their presence. Slavery cannot tolerate free speech. Five years of its exercise would banish the auction block and break every chain in the South.” – Frederick Douglass, A Plea for Free Speech (via Spiked‘s Brendan O’Neill)
  • President Trump really screwed up that Yemen strike.
  • Cops in Chicago schools have very little oversight.
  • The opposite of this headline about Chelsea Clinton.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2jHE6V6
via IFTTT

Central Bankers ‘Inconvenient Truth’: Policies Boosted Wealth-Inequality, Failed To Generate “Growth”

Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

Rather than be seen to be further enriching the rich, I think central banks will start closing the "free money for financiers" spigots.

Take a quick glance at these charts of the Federal Reserve balance sheet and bank credit in the U.S. Notice what happened to bank credit after the Fed "tapered" and stopped expanding its balance sheet?

Bank credit exploded higher:

Now look at corporate profits:

Once the Fed ended its $3.7 trillion "experiment" of vastly expanding its money-creation and bond-buying in early 2014, what happened to bank credit? Bank credit had expanded by a bit over $1 trillion in the early years of the Fed's quantitative easing, but it really took off after QE3 ended, soaring roughly $2 trillion.

This was the policy goal all along: the Fed would do the heavy lifting to keep credit and the financial markets from imploding, and eventually private-sector credit would expand enough to fuel a self-sustaining recovery.

While measures of employment and production have lofted higher, productivity, profits and wages for the bottom 95% have all stagnated. Is it coincidental than corporate profits began weakening once the Fed's QE3 ended? Perhaps.

How about the stagnation of household median income during the Fed's expansion and the rise of private bank credit from 2014 to the present? Was that also a coincidence?

If the economy was expanding smartly as the Fed was goosing credit higher, it certainly wasn't trickling down to households.

What's happening beneath the happy-happy surface is that the returns on expanding credit are diminishing rapidly. The Fed's QE "free money for financiers" never did "trickle down" to the bottom 95%, and the enormous expansion of bank credit is no longer driving corporate profits higher.

There are other factors at work, of course; a global slowdown in trade, for example, a rise in energy costs and a stronger US dollar. All of these impact credit, profits and the share of GDP flowing to labor in wages, salaries and benefits.

Whatever the causes, the reality is that the positive results of credit expansion have reached the top of the S-curve and are now declining. Expanding credit, via central bank monetary policy or private-sector bank credit, is no longer boosting profits or wages.

As noted yesterday in The Central Banks Pull Back: Now It's Up to Fiscal Policy to "Save the World", even the cheerleaders of central bank gimmickry now admit QE enriched the rich and impoverished everone else.

So what happens as other central banks taper their expansion? It's unlikely to be a positive for private-sector economies stagnating despite rapid expansion of bank credit.

And what happens if central banks unleash new torrents of cash? If the returns on new credit have plummeted, rapid expansion by central banks may well hasten the slide down the S-curve– the opposite of what conventional economists expect.

Rather than be seen to be further enriching the rich, central banks will start closing the "free money for financiers" spigots. If the returns on central bank "free money for financiers" are diminishing rapidly while public anger at rising wealth inequality is heating up, why put the central bank's credibility and political independence on the line for a policy that has visibly failed to benefit Main Street?

We discuss these trends and much more about the economy in My podcast with X22: The Central Bankers Are Going To Shutoff The Spigot And The Economy Will Rollover.

via http://ift.tt/2jHzfD6 Tyler Durden