On Trump, Conservatives Have Little Choice but to Take it Issue by Issue: New at Reason

Trump is not presidential, competent or ideologically (or otherwise) coherent most of the time. The alternative doesn’t sound that great, either.

David Harsanyi writes:

Resist?!

Sure. What would you have us resist?

Everything.

There’s an expectation—and often a demand—that movement conservatives be all in or all out on the Donald Trump presidency. Lock-stepping partisans of both varieties offer this false choice. The election phase of the debate is over. Traditionally, presidents offer a menu of policies that more or less comport with the worldview of their party. This is different. So while I don’t contend to speak for all conservatives, I do imagine many are horrified/excited/sad/happy/content/embarrassed by what’s going on—often on the same day.

For me, it’s repulsive to hear President Trump and friends use authoritarian-tinged rhetoric when talking about the press. Telling the media to “keep its mouth shut” isn’t something a person in a position of power should be doing, even if journalists are antagonistic. Although the administration hasn’t yet inhibited the media in any way—by, say, illegally spying on journalists—this kind of statement is distressing because it exposes an un-American view of free expression.

Then again, Trump is also the guy who picked an originalist Supreme Court justice, who, if confirmed, will defuse Democrats’ authoritarian efforts to empower the state to ban political speech outright by overturning Citizens United. Many of us assumed the court would be lost and state power unchecked. Changing the court would be a generational victory.

So why should we expect Republicans to act like only one of the above is happening?

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2jL10G9
via IFTTT

Full-Time Jobs Soar By 457K To Record High; Part-Time Jobs Tumble By 490K

While Trump will surely point to the record drop in people not in the labor force – in addition to the overall 227K jobs gained – as proof he is starting off on the right foot (not to mention the S&P which remains within a fraction of all time highs), one other aspect of today’s jobs report the President will likely highlight is that in January, the recent trend of “part-timing” the US labor force abruptly reversed, and according to the Establishment Survey, the number of full-time jobs surged by 457K in January to a new all time high of 124,705K.

At the same time, part-time jobs tumbled by 490,000 to 27,405K, the biggest monthly drop since last June.

If Trump really wants to undo the “Obama recovery”, this is one particular trend he will want to focus on in the months ahead.

via http://ift.tt/2kpiObU Tyler Durden

Wage Growth Disappointment Sparks “Bad News Is Good News” Bid For Stocks, Bonds; Dollar Dumps

The disappointing slowdown in average hourly earnings growth – the weakest since August – means The Fed is likely on hold for March at a minimum and that “bad news” is great news for stocks and bonds and is sending the dollar tumbling…

via http://ift.tt/2k3sN5q Tyler Durden

NYU Prof Screams at the NYPD Because They Didn’t Beat Up ‘Nazi’ Gavin McInnes

ProfBlack bloc “anti-fascists” attacked right-wing media figure Gavin McInnes outside a New York University building on Thursday night.

McInnes was there to give a talk to students, but was incessantly interrupted by hecklers. Afterward, masked black bloc protesters assaulted the controversial former Fox News personality and sprayed him with mace. Eleven people were eventually arrested.

“I saw Gavin McInnes and I wanted to punch him in the fucking face, but he got away,” said one protester.

Meanwhile, a New York University professor screamed at the police for not engaging in violence against McInnes and his followers (the so-called “Proud Boys”). Her tirade was captured on video. Watch below, starting at the 10:20 mark:

“You are fucking assholes!” the professor shouted at the New York Police Department (NYPD). “You’re protecting the Nazis!”

The NYPD had arrived on the scene to prevent violence and escort McInnes out of the building safely. But the professor seemed to think the cops’ job was to shut down a speaker she didn’t like—by engaging in explicit violence against him.

“You should kick their ass!” the professor declared, referring to McInnes and his entourage. “You should!”

Note that the professor—a dead ringer for Melissa Click, by the way—considered violence to be beneath her and her owns students.

“These are kids who are trying to learn about humanity!” she said. “They’re trying to learn about human rights and against racism and xenophobia, and LGBTQ rights, and you’re letting these fucking neo-nazis near here! It’s not up to these students to kick the ass of a neo-nazi! They don’t have to raise their fist! They were taught to be peaceful! Fuck you!”

So according to the professor, it’s college students’ job to contemplate humanity and practice tolerance, and it’s the cops’ job to beat up people with whom the left disagrees. That’s a remarkably hypocritical, and indeed, shortsighted view of the role of the police in a free society. If we give cops the right to violently censor unpopular views, leftists’ speech will be in just as much jeopardy as McInnes’s. The police already engage in far too much violence against people—people of color, in particular—and we should be pleased when they show restraint.

This far-left view that violence is a great way to battle Trump-ism has little basis in reality, according to social science research. When violent agitators sucker punch Richard Spencer, Spencer—a repulsive human being—gains sympathy points. When they shout down McInnes and attack him, McInnes gets free media and the public recoils in horror. When they set Berkeley on fire and stop Milo Yiannopoulos from speaking, Yiannopoulos sells more books.

As I argue in my latest column for The Daily Beast, Steve Bannon and President Trump are the biggest beneficiaries of mob violence:

Some may say that desperate times—the election of Trump—call for desperate measures, even though those measures have often failed in the past. I would ask them to take a mental picture of Nixon gleefully learning about the increased violence on college campuses, and then replace Nixon with Trump, who has just learned from Bannon that anti-Yiannopoulos protesters resorted to violence to shut him down.

Would Bannon and Trump be saddened to learn this news? Or would they see it as an opportunity?

Oh, by the way, here’s what Trump tweeted at 6:13 a.m. Thursday morning:

“If U.C. Berkeley does not allow free speech and practices violence on innocent people with a different point of view – NO FEDERAL FUNDS?”

Quite the mystery, huh?

Since I wrote that, Trump has weighed in again:

McInnes, it should be noted, routinely says obnoxious things that deserve criticism. He’s something of a Diet Milo. But the sort of anti-fascist violence—a contradiction if ever there was one—on display last night will be seen as legitimizing whatever law-and-order based repression the Trump administration plans to foist upon American citizens.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2kZuu88
via IFTTT

Americans “Not In The Labor Force” Plunge By A Record 736,000

While Trump has personally expressed skepticism about the validity of the payrolls report, and especially the seasonally adjusted Establishment Survey, one aspect of the jos report he has been especially focused on is the number of people who are out of the labor force for economic reasons or otherwise: this is the infamous 95 million number that he brings up every time the strength of the “Obama recovery” has been mentioned. Which is why we are confident Trump will be happy to learn that in January, while the US economy added some 227K jobs according to the Establishment Survey, the Household Survey showed that the number of people not in the labor force tumbled by a whopping 736,000, the biggest drop in our series history, bringing the number of Americans not in the labor force to 94,366.

Curiously, a driver of this move is that the civilian non-institutional population reportedly declined by 660K, declining to 254,082K, which we attribute to the annual benchmark revisions in the jobs report.

One of the direct consequences of this move is that the unemployment rate went up as the civilian labor force grew from 159,640K to 159,716K even as the number of Employed workers – per the household survey – actually declined by 30,000 to 152,081.

It also means that the Labor Participation Rate rose from 62.7% to 62.9%, the highet print since September.

via http://ift.tt/2l2W1SU Tyler Durden

A Walkthrough of Silver Abuse from the 1990’s Until Now

Summary

 Submitted by Vince Lanci and MarketSlant. "If you are bullish gold, buy silver" is an axiom I'm fond of repeating. This axiom is a positive one for Silver people, but actually has its roots in cynicism and manipulation years ago.

Silver is more volatile, which is why in the short term it over-reacts relative to Gold. We now believe that Silver is the better investment going forward because there are big forces with too much to lose if it does not keep a reliable ratio with Gold. You must stomach the higher volatility. We simply believe the "rule" no longer applies to Silver only as a function of its higher volatility. We believe it applies in the long term as an investment now. First let’s look at the phrase's cynical roots in the context of how Bullion Dealers used to (and some still) operate:

The 1990's: Buy Silver if you are Bullish Gold – and don't need your money: The root for this axiom is not in a love for Silver. It is how Bullion Banks herded clients into metals. In the 90's, Silver was a broken market. PM investors hated it. Every day we heard the demoralizing stories while Swiss Bank shoved Calls down our throats hedging their LATAM producer business.

Losers trade Silver:

  • Hunt Bros were robbed. The Comex will cry foul and the Gov't will force liquidation- no argument. they did it again to Buffet in 1997
  • Silver is a waste product of nickel production now- Yup, pour acid on mined nickel and out pops Silver. Leech mining
  • Film is dead– there is no use for Silver anymore.- Yup. I remember looking at potential Silver uses like it replacing chlorine in swimming pools, rationalizing my long call position.. not good

Silver Was a Roach Motel: The result is Silver had a wider bid-offer on a huge contract not suited for retail. And finally, it had non-continuous liquidity, aka markets that flaked from 1 cent wide to 10 cents wide for no apparent reason. This last part killed me.

Silver was indeed a roach motel in the 90's. If J. Aron (GS) owned the Gold mkt, Republic and HSBC owned the Silver market. And good luck getting an exit price when you needed one. For energy traders: Ever have to trade Heating Oil without Morgan Stanley or BP involved? Same idea.

But George Soros and PhiBro (based on info and evidence at the time) changed that in 1994. Even though their short squeeze was aborted, it became apparent that Silver shorts were too complacent. Then in 1997 Warren Buffet and PhiBro (Andy Hall) capitalized on the concept. More on that below.

The Mechanics of Silver Manipulation- Short Con

  1. When Gold rallies it did so from origin interest or from Banks releasing recommendations to its "special" clients
  2.  Silver could lag in early stages of any Gold rally, as it did often in the 90's.
  3.  Post a Gold rally, Bullion banks still had precious metals demand on its books, and they were likely short Gold
  4. The Banks would often say, " Silver is the better value here, we like it and are long"
  5. And that was the end of the rally

How Does Buying Silver Kill Gold Rallies? Think of Silver as the cheapest means at the time to get PM exposure. As hedge fund money allocated to Gold, Silver was left behind initially. What follows was witnessed almost monthly. We watched from our option trading pits as the real life events that determined RSI and stochastics played out in front of us. Here is how it used to play out typically:

  1. Big Money Funds Buy Gold
    • Origin Order Flow Buys Weakness: So the Paul Tudor Jones' of the world would get long Gold and some of that flow was handled by the Bullion arms of US Banks
    • Information would leak. Sometimes by the buyer, sometimes by the Bank, usually by both
    • Gold rallied before (Banks buy) during (Tudor buys), and after (see #2 below) the order is filled
  2. Tier 2 Funds Enter
    • Either  Banks would get a call from the tag-along funds or the banks would call them with a "tip"- "pssst, Tudor is buying"
    • The Chesapeakes would buy less than Tudor. And the execution was likely less than perfect- but they beat the vwap!
    • Banks also start to sell some of their own longs to the Tier 2 Players to lock in their flow trading profits
  3. Momo funds enter
    • At this point, momentum signals would go off and trend chasing funds would start to buy strength, enter Trout and others.
    • But during these days Gold priced supply, not demand. Which means there were no trends, just price discovery for readily available supply to hit the market
  4. The Kiss of Death- Buy Silver
    • Now you have all sorts of undercapitalized over-leveraged players looking to get in
    • They can't afford to buy Gold to get proper exposure for their capital
    • The Banks oblige them: "Buy silver, it is undervalued on a relative basis"
    • phone clerks used to snicker and announce to the floor "Trout is buying, game over"
    • And that was the top. For there was no retail to sell to.

Silver Educates a Reluctant Chartist: So when a colleague at JPM used to say, Buy Silver if you are bullish Gold, he was right. But he  always followed it with, "But it's a quick trade, don't take it home."  So I started watching the RSI and Stochastics as a non-believer in technical analysis. One of the traders I worked with, Gregg Salzman, was a big contributor to learning charts. The result was a begrudging respect for technical analysis as a confirmation of the monthly tragedy we witnessed in Silver.

And the JPM guy was right. In fact, Silver itself was an RSI non-confirmation signal of Gold's overbought status at the time. Less money invested, moved more than Gold that day. And a sign that any fund that had PM money to invest was done allocating. Next up, Banks gunned the stop-loss orders below left  by their clients. Tudor? He was long gone by then.

Short Silver becomes a crowded trade

At some point the pendulum had swung too far the other way. Miners were hedging production not yet mined to stay in business. They relied on the ability to borrow above ground Silver in HSBC, Republic etc vaults to make delivery if they had to. Funds did not take delivery, instead always rolling to the next month and getting killed on the contango. During this time I took delivery a few times  to see if the contango would snap. It usually didn't until after my FCM forced me to retender. It did start to work later on. But the Silver prophets were George Soros, and Warren Buffet.

Why Did Soros and Buffet Play Silver and not Gold?

  1. Central Banks did not own Silver
  2. In 1994, it was widely held that Soros started his accumulation in Gold and was told "stop" by the Fed- so he turned to Silver with PhiBro
  3. Warren Buffet after rescuing PhiBro and its parent company in 1994 makes his own play on Silver. Based from what we saw on Silver miners sloppy cash flow mgt. The Gov't requested he not take delivery. He obliged, lending the miners who did not have Silver to deliver back to them at a 40% cost for a year based on the bacwardation.

Today: Buy Silver if you are Bullish Gold

Because Gold will be:

  1. Confiscated where it can be.-When China Confiscates Gold- Get Silver like JPM
  2. Taxed where possible.- LATAM countries 
  3. So called Physical ETFs flaking on requests for bullion as in the Xetra-Gold fund case.– do you want a free toaster instead?
  4. Prohibited from being stored in JPM safety deposit boxes- a CYA in case a Gold count is taken?
    • as of April 2015, JPMorgan Chase sent a letter to all renters of safe deposit boxes, specifying a new agreement that they must sign if they wish to continue to rent a safe deposit box. It includes this key phrase:“Contents of the box: You agree not to store any cash or coins other than those found to have a collectible value.”
  5. Silver will not be Confiscated
    • And the major longs in Silver will do what they can to keep a stable ratio between the 2 metals so that if Gold ever becomes Gov't domain only, and a ratio is fixed for Silver at that time, (or not), the data will back it up.

Why not Platinum?

By all means, PGM's fit the bill. But they are very soft and actually lose mass overtime just by being handled. Hence they aren't used in coins.What's the exit strategy?

Related Articles

vlanci@echobay.com

Twitter: @vlancipictures

 

 

 

via http://ift.tt/2l4ts72 Vince Lanci

Caught On Tape: Chaos Erupts At NYU College Republicans Event, 11 Arrested

The NYU College Republicans likely had no idea what they were setting themselves up for when they invited Vice Media co-founder Gavin McInnes to speak on their campus.  Two years ago such an event almost certainly would have gone completely unnoticed but for the the couple of hundred students in attendance.  But in today’s post-Trumpian world, every appearance of a conservative personality is taken by intolerant Leftists as just another opportunity to destroy public/private property, incite violence and shout catchy slogans incorporating the word “Nazi.”

According to Reuters, McInnes’ speech was cut short when protesters rushed into the room where he was speaking and began interrupting him.  The protesters subsequently scuffled with police officers and McInnes supporters outside the university’s student center in New York City, where he was invited to speak by NYU College Republicans.  Here is some footage of the violence:

 

And here is a very entertaining leftist, who claims to be “professor”, having a nervous breakdown on camera while yelling at the cops.  Ironically, she insists that cops assault conservative protesters while suggesting they should also protect students from hate.

“You should be ashamed of yourselves.  You should be standing up to those Nazis.  You should be protecting these students from hate.  This is hate!”

 

“Fuck you.  Fuck you.  Fuck you.  These are kids who are trying to learn about humanity.  They’re trying to learn about human rights and racism and Xenophobia and LBGTQ rights and you’re letting these fucking Neo-Nazis near here.  You should kick their ass.”

 

McInnes responded to the violence via Twitter saying that he was “sprayed with pepper spray but being called a Nazi burned way more.”

 

Meanwhile, NYU’s College Republicans responded to the violence on Facebook:

“Our intention was not to advocate for McInnes’s views, in fact many of us differ with him when it comes to certain ideas.  The purpose of this event was to promote free speech and not to promote certain ideas.”

And Trump seemed to chime in on this latest outburst of the intolerant left saying that “Professional anarchists, thugs and paid protesters are proving the point of the millions of people who voted to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

via http://ift.tt/2jFACCg Tyler Durden

Trump’s First Payroll Report: 227K Surge In Jobs, But Earnings Disappoint; Unemployment Rate Ticks Higher

Donald Trump’s first official economic report has started off on the right foot, with the BLS reporting that some 227K jobs were added in January, far above the 175K expected, and in line with the ADP number.

The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for November was revised down from +204,000 to +164,000, and the change for December was revised up from +156,000 to +157,000. With these   revisions, employment gains in November and December combined were 39,000 lower than previously reported.

Offsetting the headline surge in jobs was a disappointment in the average hourly earnings which rose a tepid 0.1% , below the 0.3% expected, and below the downward revised December 0.2% (from 0.4%) despite January being the month in which minimum wage hikes took place across 19 states.

On the year, average hourly earnings rose by 2.5%, the weakest annual growth since August. In January, average hourly earnings of private-sector production and nonsupervisory employees increased by 4 cents to $21.84.

While the amoung of average weekly hours for all employees remained flat at 34.4, the average weekly earnings dipped to 1.9%, the lowest print in the past year.

Judging by the market reaction, which has seen the dollar drop as stocks and bonds rose, this is a mildly dovish report and is likely to sow more doubts about the Fed’s plane to hike rates three times in 2017.

Also of note, the unemployment rate ticked up from 4.7% to 4.8% even as the number of employed workers according to the Household survey declined modestly.

More details from the report:

  • Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 227,000 in January. Employment increased in retail trade, construction, and financial activities.
  • Retail trade employment increased by 46,000 over the month and by 229,000 over the year. Three industries added jobs in January–clothing and clothing accessories stores (+18,000), electronics and appliance stores (+8,000), and furniture and home furnishings stores (+6,000).

    Employment in construction rose by 36,000 in January, following little change in December. Residential building added 9,000 jobs over the month, and employment continued to trend up among residential specialty trade contractors (+11,000). Over the past 12 months, construction has added 170,000 jobs.

  • Financial activities added 32,000 jobs in January, with gains in real estate (+10,000), insurance carriers and related activities (+9,000), and credit intermediation and related activities (+9,000). Financial activities added an average of 15,000 jobs per month in 2016.
  • In January, employment in professional and technical services rose by 23,000, about in line with the average monthly gain in 2016. Over the month, job gains occurred in computer systems design and related services (+13,000).
  • Employment in food services and drinking places continued to trend up in January (+30,000). This industry added 286,000 jobs over the past 12 months.
  • Employment in health care also continued to trend up in January (+18,000), following a gain of 41,000 in December. The industry has added 374,000 jobs over the past 12 months.
  • Employment in other major industries, including mining and logging, manufacturing, wholesale trade, transportation and warehousing, information, and government, showed little change over the month.
  • The average workweek for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls was unchanged at 34.4 hours in January. In manufacturing, the workweek edged up by 0.1 hour to 40.8 hours, while overtime edged down by 0.1 hour to 3.2 hours. The average workweek for production and nonsupervisory employees on private nonfarm payrolls was 33.6 hours for the sixth consecutive month.
  • In January, average hourly earnings for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls rose by 3 cents to $26.00, following a 6-cent increase in December. Over the year, average hourly earnings have risen by 2.5 percent. In January, average hourly earnings of private-sector production and nonsupervisory employees increased by 4 cents to $21.84.

via http://ift.tt/2kwNRoq Tyler Durden

Kellyanne Conway Invents ‘Bowling Green Massacre,’ Uber CEO Quits Trump Economic Council, How Legalization Changed Teen Pot Use in Colorado: AM Links

  • In an interview on Hardball Thursday evening, Trump counselor Kellyanne Conway defended his executive order on immigration by citing Barack Obama’s response to to the “Bowling Green Massacre,” an incident “most people don’t know [about] because it didn’t get covered.” It was not covered, however, because it is not a thing that actually happened.
  • White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer told a press briefing Thursday that Trump was putting Iran “on notice” because Iran had attacked a U.S. naval ship; in actuality, suspected Houthi rebels in Yemen (a group loosely linked to the Iranian government, but definitely distinct from it) attacked a Saudi naval vessel.
  • U.S. Senators voted 52-48 Friday morning to cut off debate about whether Betsy DeVos should be confirmed as the next education secretary, clearing the way for a final confirmation vote next week.
  • A man with a machete was shot by a French soldier as he attempted to enter the Louvre in Paris, in what police head Michel Cadot called “an attack by a person … who represented a direct threat and whose actions suggested a terrorist context.”
  • Uber CEO Travis Kalanick has quit Donald Trump’s economic council, according to the Associated Press. Kalanick told Uber employees Thursday that “joining the group was not meant to be an endorsement of the president or his agenda but unfortunately it has been misinterpreted to be exactly that.”
  • The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) finds that teen cannabis consumption “has not changed since legalization either in terms of the number of people using or the frequency of use among users.”
  • Eleven people were arrested after protesters stormed a room on the New York University campus where conservative pundit and former Vice editor Gavin McInnnes was speaking.
  • A Georgia bill would ban universities from initiating sexual assault disciplinary hearings unless a criminal investigation had been launched.
  • The truth about Nazi Furries.”

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don’t forget to sign up for Reason’s daily updates for more content.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2k9zvJT
via IFTTT

Meanwhile, over in Zimbabwe. . .

On April 12, 2009, the government of Zimbabwe officially abandoned its currency.

You probably remember the stories; starting in the early 2000s, the Zimbabwe central bank began printing massive quantities of money in order for the government to make ends meet.

This resulted in one of the worst episodes of hyperinflation in modern history.

Zimbabwe’s rate of inflation in 2001 was more than 100%. Prices basically doubled.

But that was nothing.

By 2003, inflation was nearly 600%. By 2006, more than 1,200%. The following year, more than 66,000%.

At its peak in 2009, Zimbabwe’s inflation was estimated at 89.7 sextillion percent, which looks like this:

89,700,000,000,000,000,000,000%

Eventually the government finally capitulated and chose to abandon its currency altogether.

And for the next several years, Zimbabwe had no official currency.

People transacted in dollars, euros, South African rand, Chinese renminbi… any foreign currency they could get their hands on.

But a few months ago the government of Zimbabwe decided to give it another try.

They created a new type of currency they’re calling a “bond note”, which is basically
Zimbabwe dollar version 2.0.

It’s been barely two months since the bond notes debuted, but people are already losing confidence.

There was even a recent story in which a government agency refused to accept its own bond notes as a form of payment.

It seems Zimbabweans have adopted a ‘fool me twice, shame on me’ attitude. They’re skeptical.

The bond notes are supposed to trade at parity with the US dollar, i.e. a $5 Zimbabwe bond note is supposed to be the same as $5 USD.

The government has absolutely nothing to back up this assertion, other than the usual tactics of coercion and intimidation.

They’ve threatened to throw anyone in jail who’s caught trading bond notes at anything other than the official 1:1 exchange rate.

Naturally these threats have only spurred the creation of a black market where Zimbabwe’s bond notes are bought and sold at their real values.

Right now the bond notes are trading at 5% to 10% below the US dollar. But this is just the beginning.

As Zimbabwe continues to print more bond notes, the new currency’s value will plummet.

But here’s the important thing to remember: it’s not just Zimbabwe.

Just about EVERY country plays games with its currency.

The primary difference boils down to one thing: confidence.

When the US Federal Reserve or Bank of Japan conjures money out of thin air, people still confidence in those currencies.

And western central bankers have not been shy about abusing that confidence in extremis.

In the United States, the Federal Reserve has printed so much money that its capital reserves constitute a mere 0.88% of its balance sheet.

The Fed has essentially rendered itself nearly insolvent.

But hey, confidence.

Meanwhile the European Central Bank has actually made interest rates NEGATIVE.

And in Japan, not only are interest rates negative, but the central bank has resorted to mass-buying of shares on the Tokyo Stock Exchange, to the point that the central bank is now a top 5 shareholder in more than 80 of Japan’s largest companies.

And yet, investors somehow still remain confident that these central bankers know what they’re doing.

Now that is some serious snake-charming talent.

You really have to hand it to these central bankers.

They have managed to convince some of the most financially sophisticated people in the world that these desperate tactics, which are fundamentally no different than what Zimbabwe did, will somehow result in zero consequences.

That’s one serious Jedi mind trick.

Perhaps it will continue to be this way.

Perhaps the confidence in western central banks will last forever no matter how crazy their shenanigans become.

Perhaps there will never, ever be any consequences from their reckless behavior.

Perhaps.

And perhaps the New England Patriots will decide to ditch Tom Brady this weekend and put me in the game as their starting Superbowl quarterback.

A boy can dream.

These central banks have managed to make it this far on smoke and mirrors. Kudos for that.

But the old adage of investing holds true in central banking as well: past performance is no guarantee of future results.

There is absolutely zero reason to presume that central banks can maintain course without consequence.

And last time I checked, there was a ton of uncertainty in the world which could potentially shatter that confidence.

It certainly behooves any rational person to look at the big picture and take some sensible steps to distance yourself from the risks.

You can’t control your central bank. But you can control your own decisions.

A decision to own gold and silver, for example, is a conscious choice to trade paper currency (i.e. a liability of a central bank) for something that’s real.

There are countless other options.

If you have the technological understanding, for example, cryptocurrency may be a viable option.

There’s no reason to panic or hastily dump your entire life’s savings into any alternative asset.

Be smart. Be rational. Take baby steps. But definitely take action.

from Sovereign Man http://ift.tt/2kA6xDo
via IFTTT