FBI Hid Fact That Russia Thought Carter Page Was An “Idiot” Unworthy Of Recruiting: Sperry

The FBI, in its ham-handed FISA application on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, somehow forgot to include the fact that Russian spies thought Page was an “idiot” who was unworthy of recruiting, according to Paul Sperry of RealClear Investigations

The FBI was aware of Russians’ skepticism that Page knew anything of value or was a significant player because the bureau had recorded them voicing such doubts in a wiretap, from an earlier espionage case involving three Russian spies working undercover for the Kremlin in New York. –RCI

The FBI of course used that 2013 case as part of the FISA application – claiming to have evidence of Page’s recruitment by the Kremlin, however the “idiot” part was deliberately withheld. 

They have been made public only in redacted form, professing evidence that Page was “recruited” by Russian intelligence and had “coordinated” with the Russian government. But “that’s a mischaracterization of the facts in the case,” a congressional source said. –RCI

This vital detail was also omitted from three subsequent renewals of the wiretap warrant, at least one of which Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein signed off on. The warrants from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) enabled the DOJ/FBI to spy on Page and others he was in contact with for almost a year, according to Sperry’s sources. 

As Sperry notes, when the FISA warrants are viewed in totality, it’s clear that “the court was not alerted to this seemingly critical information,” according to congressional sources, which happened despite the FBI and DOJ officials having full access to the 26-page court filing.

The FISA applications omit the fact that a Russian intelligence officer called page ‘an idiot,’ ” one congressional source said. The official spoke only on condition of anonymity due to the still-classified nature of the information. –RCI

What’s more, former FBI officials as well as agents familiar with FISA warrants say that the DOJ’s affidavits for Page appear to be “material misrepresentations” which fail to adhere to so-called Woods Procedures which require the accuracy of facts from sworn declarants – procedures which were strengthened in 2003 by Robert Mueller, then director of the FBI

Withholding material and exculpatory evidence from the FISA applications may also have violated Page’s Fourth Amendment protections against omissions of material facts that would undermine or negate probable cause to search.

It is illegal,” said veteran FBI agent Michael Biasello. “The affiant” — the person swearing to the affidavit — “cannot cherry-pick only information favorable to the case.” –RCI

Who’s exposed?

According to Sperry, if the DOJ ever prosecutes itself for this and other FISA abuses, senior officials who swore out the Page warrants could be subject to perjury and conspiracy charges, incluging James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Sally Yates and Rod Rosenstein – who could all be barred from appearing before the FISA court as well. 

Read the rest here

via RSS https://ift.tt/2wRIMfn Tyler Durden

It’s A Dollar-Based Boom Shortage More Than Anything

Submitted by Jeff Snider of Alhambra Investments

Liquidity preferences are one of the least discussed economic concepts. There are several channels into which monetary instability can hamper the real economy. A “dollar” squeeze doesn’t just impact banks, they often pass it along further down the economic chain.

In its most extreme form, we had something like 2009. Some of the best companies all over the world found themselves stranded through nothing they had done. The Great “Recession” was bad, meaning even the best businesses suffered on revenue and profits. But even sure-survivors were shut off from cash, abandoned by banks and funding markets at the worst possible time.

I’m talking about companies like McDonalds which needed (and always needs) to fund working capital regardless of health, ill or not, on its top or bottom lines. Banks withdrew liquidity backstops and credit lines, and then commercial paper became impossible to negotiate on reasonable terms.

Some like McDonalds, Verison, and Caterpillar were forced to almost beg. In one of the more absurd aspects of the 2008 panic, there was the global fastfood chain knocking at the door of the Federal Reserve getting it to buy commercial paper the market wouldn’t on any terms. Big Macs had become Too Big To Fail, too.

What do you do if as a C-Suite officer you found yourself in such a situation? The first thing is that you vow never to be so vulnerable again. As a company, you make it a policy, informal or otherwise, to self-insure on liquidity. That means any number of things, up to and including holding large cash balances far greater than you ever would have before August 2007.

It also means managing your cost structure down the tenth of a penny in search of hidden future liquidity risks. Hiring new workers and building new facilities are in terms of cash huge, huge commitments beyond today. The standards for undertaking them just added a new chapter.

And if the overall economy is at best lackluster on top of all this?

You can begin to appreciate why so many corporations have said, “screw it, buy back the stock instead.” On the surface, it appears to be a Catch 22 but only if you don’t see the underlying issue for what it really is. The economy doesn’t grow because no one will seriously invest in anything but stock price growth.

According to the BLS, productivity has picked up a little once again. Since the downturn in 2015-16, productivity has increased a bit on average from those lows. This isn’t surprising. Instead, it reinforces one of the most insidious aspects of the lack of real economic growth these last eleven years.

This current “boom” is little more than the usual low-grade upswing that always follows each and every “unexpected” downturn. Companies know this in a way Economists never will. Buy back the stock, since even when it’s one step forward inside boardrooms they know what they will never say publicly; the return of “dollar” volatility will mean two steps back. Liquidity risks all over again.

Total hours have picked up since the beginning of 2017 but not nearly as fast as the peaks of the prior two upturns. At an average of 2.2% in Q2 2018, that’s substantially less than 3.0% figured for Q4 2014 and 2.8% in Q1 2012. That’s why output, real GDP, in what has been the best quarter since 2014 was materially less than 2014. Even the “best” of times aren’t so good anymore.

Companies that are overly attuned to liquidity risks and therefore overmanage costs aren’t going to be heavily competing for new workers – no matter how many times the Wall Street Journal or Washington Post may come up with some wild story about how one HR department or another is attempting to handle a purportedly shocking, nationwide labor shortage.

The simple and easy answer to any difficulties finding and securing new workers, especially during a true economic boom, is to pay them.

There continues to be, unequivocally, absolutely no evidence whatsoever that there is a labor shortage to even the smallest degree. None. According to yet another labor force data point, Unit Labor Costs, wage pressures for still another quarter/year remain historically subdued.

In fact, since Q3 2017, Unit Labor Costs have been decelerating on a year-over-year basis. In Q2 2018, they rose by less than 2%. It doesn’t matter how low the unemployment rate goes, there is no relationship with wages, pay, therefore income and economic recovery. NONE.

In early 2007, when the unemployment rate was last about as low as it has been over the last year, Unit Labor Costs rose by just about 4% – more than twice the pace of the current quarter in which the unemployment rate is testing the threes. In 2000, when the unemployment rate had dipped below 4%, Unit Labor Costs gained more than 4.3%. There is just no case for a tight labor market, let alone any shortage.

Companies aren’t paying for workers because they don’t actually want a lot of new labor. That’s way too much commitment without the credible prospects for sustained economic growth. At least with share repurchases they can use funds for something that will raise the share price (executives get paid) and not risk sending it into a tailspin with future cash commitments they can’t easily shed if things go wrong again – which they do every few years. They are not focused at all on growth but on risk.

There is no boom. If there was, productivity would be surging as companies heavily invested in productive capacity and bought loads of new labor at whatever price the market will demand.

This updated employment data is more than consistent with the construction figures. In terms of major potential outlays, those that feature not just demands on current cash but also entangle any business in future sustained liabilities, companies are reluctant to do the very things that the economy needs to grow; the so-called supply side.

Historically low productivity isn’t some myth, call it R* or even a negative neutral interest rate if you want. The problem continues to be eurodollar. With another “rising dollar” in the works, thus another potential global downswing becoming more and more visible each passing month, is it more or less likely this is all going to change so that a real boom can happen? In other words, are companies finally about to throw caution to the wind, or are they going to batten down the hatches for a fourth time?

These questions don’t just get asked of US businesses, obviously. We have an initial sense of how many globally are facing the dollar already.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Nj6hHV Tyler Durden

Goldman CFO Says Report That Bank Is Abandoning Plan To Trade Cryptocurrencies As “Fake News”

One day after bitcoin and other cryptos tumbled on a Business Insider report that Goldman Sachs was abandoning plans to open a trading desk for cryptocurrencies…

… the bank’s chief financial officer looked to “clear the air” what was really going on.

Speaking on stage at the TechCrunch Disrupt Conference in San Francisco, Goldman Sachs CFO Martin Chavez said “I never thought I would hear myself use this term but I really have to describe that news as fake news,” CNBC reported.

Chavez looked to knock down the report about the banking dialing back plans, but also make clear that there’s never been a timeline for this effort.

“When we talked about exploring digital assets that it was going to be exploration that would be evolving over time. Maybe someone who was thinking about our activities here got very excited that we would be making markets as principal and physical bitcoin, and as they got into it they realized part of the evolution but its not here yet.”

The price of bitcoin and other top cryptocurrencies tumbled after the initial report earlier this week, which however was never confirmed by Goldman. The Wall Street bank had been considering the launch of some sort of cryptocurrency option for clients for the past year. But it’s never been quite clear just what the bank was planning.

“In response to client interest in digital currencies, we are exploring how best to serve them in this space,” a Goldman spokeswoman told CNBC in October, when outgoing CEO Lloyd Blankfein tweeted that Goldman was “still thinking about bitcoin,” and that the bank was “not endorsing/rejecting.”

“Know that folks also were skeptical when paper money displaced gold,” Blankfein said at the time.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2NpLgv0 Tyler Durden

NJ Police Raid GoFundMe Scammers After Couple Spends $400K In Donations For Homeless Vet

Police in Florence Township, New Jersey executed a search warrant Thursday morning to comb through the home of a couple who raised over $400,000 for a Philadelphia homeless man, Johnny Bobbitt Jr, reports CNN

Florence Township Chief of Police Brian Boldizar said that the warrant was for a search of a property belonging to McClure and D’Amico. 

In a statement, Burlington County Prosecutor Scott A. Coffina confirmed a search warrant had been executed “in connection with a criminal investigation into the Johnny Bobbitt matter” but said the couple have not been charged with anything. –CNN

Last October, Bobbitt came across Kate McClure after she had become stranded on the side of I-95 in a bad section of Philadelphia.  Even though he was living on the streets, he used his last 20 dollars to buy her some gasoline so that she could get home.

To thank him, McClure and her boyfriend Mark D’Amico created a GoFundMe campaign to raise money to help Bobbitt get off the streets.  The original goal was to raise $10,000, but the story went mega-viral and the campaign ultimately raised a total of $403,000. But McClure and D’Amico never gave Bobbitt the money. Instead, they took charge of it and bought him the things that they thought he “needed”.

As we previously reported, Bobbitt lawyered up and has alleged that the couple committed fraud and conspiracy by taking large amounts of the donations to “enjoy a lifestyle they could not afford” and using the account as “their personal piggy bank.” Bobbitt’s attorney, Chris Fallon, asked a judge to appoint a supervisor to manage the money in the fundraising account.

And last Thursday a judge gave the South Jersey couple less than a day to hand over what’s left of the $400,000 they raised through a GoFundMe campaign for Johnny Bobbitt Jr.

On Tuesday, the Philly Inquirer reported that Fallon said he was told the money is all gone.

Fallon said he learned of the missing money in a conference call Tuesday morning with lawyers for Kate McClure and Mark D’Amico, the Burlington County couple accused of mismanaging the money raised for Bobbitt.

“It completely shocked me when I heard,” said Fallon. “It came as a complete surprise to me.”

Word of the missing money came on the same day Bobbitt’s lawyers asked a judge to impose sanctions on the couple after the pair missed a court-ordered deadline to hand over the remaining GoFundMe money.

The couple told the Inquirer and Daily News last month that about $200,000 of the money remained. The balance, they said, had been spent to help Bobbitt. Bobbitt’s attorneys say he has received closer to $75,000, including the cost of the camper and an SUV, both since sold.

D’Amico admitted spending $500 of the GoFundMe money to gamble at SugarHouse Casino, but he said he paid it back with his winnings.

Jacqueline Promislo, one of Bobbitt’s three pro bono lawyers, said in a phone interview as they mulled further legal action: “We’re really concerned about the flight risk.” The lawyers asked the judge to issue sanctions requiring D’Amico and McClure to remain in New Jersey, surrender their passports, post a bond, and be barred from spending any money in their bank accounts.

According to the application for sanctions, D’Amico and McClure failed to comply with the court’s 24-hour deadline “without explanation or request for extension.”

GoFundMe spokesman Bobby Withorne said Tuesday that the company had deposited $20,000 into the escrow account created by Bobbitt’s attorneys to provide assistance for him while an investigation into the case proceeds. The Inquirer reports that Fallon said the $20,000 will be used for six months of housing and food for Bobbitt.

“We are working with law enforcement officials to ensure Johnny receives all of the funds raised on his behalf,” Withorne said.

“While we assist law enforcement with their ongoing investigation, GoFundMe is also working with Johnny’s legal team to ensure he’s receiving support while the remaining funds are being recovered.”

As for donors, if GoFundMe determines that donations were misused, the company says it refunds individual contributions of up to $1,000.

Finally, some potentially good news is that Bobbitt’s legal team says that they were able to enroll their client in a 28-day residential detox program on Monday.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2wWBmXN Tyler Durden

Brett Kavanaugh Is a Done Deal. Will He Be Good for Libertarians?: Podcast

“It’s been a circus,” says Reason Senior Editor Damon Root of the Senate confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. Even before the hearings officially commenced, Democratic senators called for a halt to the proceedings. Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) released confidential documents and likened himself to Spartacus, a self-promoting act of “civil disobedience” that mostly earned the likely 2020 presidential candidate tons of Twitter abuse.

In the latest Reason Podcast, Root, the author of Overruled: The Long War for Control of the U.S. Supreme Court, regrets the lack of smart questions from senators and candid answers from Kavanaugh. Root says the D.C. Circuit judge has at times ruled as a strict majoritarian, which is troubling from a libertarian perspective. A former member of the Bush administration, Kavanaugh has also written positively of wide-ranging executive privilege in ways that are especially disturbing during a presidency as embattled as Donald Trump’s. We talk about all that, plus the history of confirmation hearings and why they are now so heavily scripted rather than open-ended conversations about judicial philosophy and temperament. Root expects Kavanaugh to be confirmed along strictly partisan lines.

Related: “5 Questions for SCOTUS Nominee Brett Kavanugh,” by Damon Root. His blogging and other Reason coverage of the hearings is here.

Subscribe, rate, and review our podcast at iTunes. Listen at SoundCloud below:

Audio production by Ian Keyser.

Don’t miss a single Reason Podcast!

Subscribe at iTunes

Follow us at SoundCloud

Subscribe at YouTube

Like us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2wQZqLz
via IFTTT

Twitter Permanently Bans Alex Jones, Infowars

One day after Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey appeared before on Capitol Hill to tell lawmakers how his company doesn’t discriminate against conservatives, the company permanently banned Infowars host Alex Jones from the platform.

“Today, we permanently suspended @realalexjones and @infowars from Twitter and Periscope. We took this action based on new reports of Tweets and videos posted yesterday that violate our abusive behavior policy, in addition to the accounts’ previous violations,” the company posted on its Safety account.

Twitter added that it will continue to take further action “regarding other accounts potentially associated” with Jones or Infowars, and will “take action if content that violates our rules is reported or if other accounts are utilized in an attempt to circumvent their ban.” 

Twitter told the Daily Beast that the final straw was a video of Alex Jones berating CNN reporter Oliver Darcey on Wednesday, when he said “Those are the eyes of a rat” to Darcey’s face while accusing CNN of trying to police internet content. 

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2oJEmTv Tyler Durden

CDC Investigating After Multiple Passengers Fall Ill At Philadelphia Airport

One day after 19 passengers fell ill during a JFK flight from Dubai, CBS Philadelphia reports that multiple passengers fell ill on separate international flights coming into Philadelphia International Airport on Thursday. Officials said that 12 passengers arriving at the airport on American Airlines flights from Paris and Munich experienced flu-like symptoms, with multiple ambulances dispatched to the airport.

All 250 passengers and crew on the flights were held for a medical review and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was notified to investigate.

Furthermore, the CDC, Philadelphia Health Department and the Philadelphia Fire Department personnel performed medical evaluations on the passengers.

The passengers who did not fall ill are in the process of being released according to Fox 29. It’s not yet known what caused the people to become sick. No one was transported and no airport operations were impacted.

Airport spokesperson Diane Gerace released the following statement:

“As a precaution, all passengers on the two flights—totaling about 250 plus crew—were held for a medical review and the CDC was notified. CDC, the Philadelphia Health Department, and Philadelphia Fire Department personnel performed medical evaluations and assessments. The passengers—except for the 12 affected—are in the process of being released.”

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2wNamtp Tyler Durden

Jim Grant’s 10 Most Important Lessons In Finance

Authored by Simon Black via SovereignMan.com,

Jim is the editor of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer – one of the most-respected and followed financial publications in the world. In his 35 years writing Grant’s, Jim has seen a financial cycle or two.

And he’s amassed a network of many of the most important people on Wall Street (who often share their insights in his publication).

We’re excited to share a special piece from Jim in Notes today about the 10 most important lessons he’s learned in his 35 years in financial markets.

From Jim Grant:

I’ve published over 800 issues of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer to date… That’s more than four million words of market analysis.

I’ve made some good calls in that time (and, yes, some bad ones).  I’ve even gained some fame – at least in certain circles – for my more accurate predictions.

But, more importantly, I like to think that I’ve become a knowledgeable student of Mr. Market. I’ve lived through and analyzed manias and crashes.  I’ve seen interest rates fall from 20% to zero – and below… I’ve seen the stock market sawed in half and I’ve seen stocks rise far above any sane measure of valuation.

And through it all, every two weeks, I’ve shared my thoughts with a select group of readers.  Many of them have been with Grant’s since day one.

With that in mind, here are the 10 most important lessons I’ve learned in finance…

1. The key to successful investing is having everyone agree with you — LATERThe most popular investment of the day is rarely the best investment. If you want to know what’s popular, look no further than the front page of your favored business journal… Or just tune in at your next cocktail party.

At Grant’s, we seek profits where no one else is looking. We’re happy to wait for the consensus to come to us.

We’ve been contrarian since day one. In our minds, there’s no better lens through which to view the market.

2. You aren’t good with money. Because humans aren’t good with money. We buy high and sell low because it’s what comes naturally. It’s difficult to control emotions. It’s more difficult when money is involved.

But with detailed security analysis and an expert understanding of market cycles, you can minimize emotions when it comes to your portfolio.

 3. Everything about investing is cyclical… prices, valuations, enthusiasms. And this will never The greatest investors develop a sense of when markets have reached euphoric levels. And of when fear is crippling reason.

 Where do you think we stand on that scale today?

4. You can’t predict the future. Nor can the guy who claims he can.

You can, however, see how the crowd is handicapping the future. Observing the odds, you can make better choices.

You can recognize the rhythms of market cycles (see lesson 3). And with enough practice, you can profit from those cycles – or at least avoid disaster. As when we warned Grant’s readers in our September 8, 2006 issue about a bubble in subprime mortgage debt – 11 months before the crisis began. And three years later, when we advised going long bank stocks before they rallied 250%.

5. Every good idea gets driven into the ground like a tomato stake. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) were a great idea. They allowed investors diversified exposure to a number of markets for minimal fees.

 Today, ETFs account for more than 23% of all U.S. trading volume with a total market value over $3 trillion. And the ETF market is forecasted to hit $25 trillion globally by 2025.

Yes, ETFs allow investors to diversify into lots of markets for a little bit of money. But ETFs allocate money without consideration of value. And what happens when everyone rushes for the exits?

6. Markets are not perfectly efficient. Because the people who operate them aren’t perfectly reasonable. The debate over efficient markets has raged since the birth of public markets. Grant’s comes down on the side of inefficiencies—of lucrative inefficiencies.

 There will always be value in active management. It keeps the market honest. Active managers bid for companies that have been punished unjustifiably… And they apply selling pressure on egregiously overvalued, fraudulent and dying companies. It’s these inefficiencies – and Grant’slongtime, historical understanding of them – that gives our readers special perspective.

If markets were so all-fired efficient, why did the Nasdaq reach the sky in 2000? Or banks and junk bonds the depths in 2009?

 7. Patience is the highest yielding asset. Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett’s longtime partner in Berkshire Hathaway, explained the importance of patience this way:

 How did Berkshire’s track record happen? If you were an observer, you’d see that Warren [Buffett] did most of it sitting on his ass and reading. If you want to be an outlier in achievement, just sit on your ass and read most of your life.

 Let us only say that the point survives the exaggeration.

 8. Never stand in line to buy anything. Here I have a confession to make. In January 1980, at the peak of the Great Inflation of the Jimmy Carter era, a line snaked out of the doors of a lower Manhattan coin dealer. The people in that queue were waiting to buy gold at what proved to be a generational high, $850 an ounce. I was in that queue. I’ve made plenty of mistakes since then. But that particular mistake I’ve subsequently avoided. Believe me, once was enough. 

9. Leverage is like chocolate cake. Just a little bit, please.  Markets will always correct. They corrected after the Dutch tulip mania in 1630s. And they corrected after the subprime mortgage debacle in 2007. What do corrections correct? They correct the errors of a boom.

And when markets correct, they cause the most amount of financial pain to the greatest possible number of people.

 You’ll never know exactly when these corrections are coming. But if the creditors aren’t calling your assets on the way down, you will live to fight another day. And if you happen to have cash on hand, you can make the greatest profits of your investing career.

10. “Don’t overestimate the courage you will have if things go against you.”

 “Consider all the facts – meditate on them. Don’t let what you want to happen influence your judgement.”

 “Do your own thinking. Don’t let your emotions enter into it. Keep out of any environment that may affect your acting on your own reason.”

These final three items, which I’ve included as a single lesson, are in quotation marks because I borrowed them from the late Bernard M. Baruch – one of the greatest investors who ever lived.

I know he won’t mind (after a brilliant career in Wall Street and Washington, Mr. Baruch died in 1965, at the ripe old age of 94).

I came to know the great investor in the course of writing his biography. If you read enough, you, too, can assemble a circle of friends from the past as well as  the present.

*  *  *

And to continue learning how to ensure you thrive no matter what happens next in the world, I encourage you to download our free Perfect Plan B Guide.

Simon also arranged a special deal with Jim for Sovereign Man readers.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2wRq2Nd Tyler Durden

USDJPY Tumbles After Trump Hints At Japan Trade War Next

USDJPY dived after hours (following a day of weakness) after reports from The Wall Street Journal  that President Trump told a columnist that he will take his trade fights to Japan next.

Yen strengthened as safe haven carry flows reverted home on the Trump headlines…

WSJ’s James Freeman wrote  about a phone call he received from the president, in which Trump “described his good relations with the Japanese leadership but then added:

“Of course that will end as soon as I tell them how much they have to pay.'”

Freeman said the phone call came after he appeared on Fox News Channel giving the president credit for the results of his tax and regulatory reforms. During the phone call, Freeman wrote, the president sounded “still very focused on eliminating trade deficits with America’s trading partners.”

via RSS https://ift.tt/2wRiGs8 Tyler Durden

Brazilian Presidential Candidate Bolsonaro Stabbed At Campaign Event

Brazil’s far-right candidate for president Jair Bolsonaro was stabbed in the abdomen during a parade in the city Juiz de Fora Thursday. The wound is reportedly superficial and Bolsonaro is doing fine according to a tweet from his son Flavio Bolsonaro.

A journalist at the parade only feet in front of Bolonsaro, captured the attack on video.

The wound is reportedly superficial and Bolsonaro is doing fine according to a tweet from his son Flavio Bolsonaro

Bolonsaro, who was caught by supporters as he fell, was quickly whisked away in an SUV, further video indicated. His son later said on Twitter that the wound was superficial and his father was doing fine.

A former army captain, Bolsonaro had been consolidating his position at the head of the race for Brazil’s presidency in a scenario without former President Lula’s candidacy.

Following news of the stabbling, Brazil’s Ibovespa index extended on its gains in the afternoon, as traders assumed the candidate would be the recipient of a “sympathy vote.

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2M63NrA Tyler Durden