“Un-Accommodative” Powell Pummels Stocks As Yield Curve Crumbles

Johnny 5 just could not get his mind around the non-accommodative Fed was still accommodative and slowly hiking rates fits with a particularly bright moment in the economy???

Chinese stocks overnight were mixed (ended higher but had an ugly afternoon session)…

 

European stocks ramped into their close (before The Fed spoiled the party)…

 

Stocks had rallied into the Fed statement, kneejerked higher, then drifted lower after Powell mentioned valuations, then accelerated lower on a big MoC Sell…

 

On the week, all major indices are red (Nasdaq hovering around unch)…

 

Equity performance post-Fed was ugly…

 

Bank stocks took a hit today…

 

The Dollar and Treasury yields ended lower…

 

With all yields aside from the 2Y now lower on the week (5Y unch)…

 

Bond Bears took a beating as the entire curve legged down 4-5bps at the longer-end…

 

The yield curve flattened notably after The Fed…

 

Does anyone else look at this chart of the great Dollar Index and think – penny stock?

 

The CNY Fix was at its weakest since Aug 23rd…

 

Amid the chaos in the dollar, Cryptos were bid…

 

PMs and WTI slipped (crude build), copper was flat…

 

Gold and Silver chopped around after The Fed…

 

We leave it to Warren Meyers (@MeyersWarren) to sum things up:

MOC Imbalance $3.2B to Sell… Well that was fun, and now it’s time to bring back “accommodative.”

via RSS https://ift.tt/2N2oBkg Tyler Durden

China’s New Party Line: We’re Trying To Save The World From The US

Authored by Mac Slavo via SHTFplan.com,

China has accused the United States of “trade bullyism practices” that have become “the greatest source of uncertainty and risk for the recovery of the global economy.” And their new party line has become: “we’re trying to save the world from the US government.”

In a 71-page paper, the Chinese government came out swinging against the US’s efforts to ignite a disastrous trade war. They accused President Donald Trump’s administration of “trade bullyism practices” but worse, say they are attempting to save the world. According to CNBCthe document, which was published on Monday, outlined the Chinese government’s response to criticisms leveled against it by the US. Issues addressed in the report include the trade imbalance between the two countries, Beijing’s subsidy policy and alleged intellectual property theft by China’s companies.

Beijing has also called out Washington for its policies that it “inhibit fair competition in the US” — such as subsidies — and allegedly abusing national security laws to obstruct the “normal investment activities” of Chinese companies on American shores.

“China does not want a trade war, but it is not afraid of one and will fight one if necessary,” Beijing said in the document.

“We have a highly resilient economy, an enormous market, and the hard-working, talented, and united Chinese people. We also have the support of all countries in the world that reject protectionism, unilateralism, and hegemony.”

“The US government has taken extreme trade protectionist measures, which have undermined the international economic order, caused damage to China-US trade and trade relations around the world, disrupted the global value chain and the international division of labor, upset market expectations, and led to violent swings in the international financial and commodity markets. It has become the greatest source of uncertainty and risk for the recovery of the global economy,” the paper said.

American officials have attempted to claim that China is, in fact, the aggressor in the trade war because it took advantage of the US’s consumer mentality for many years.

The document was released on the same day as an escalation in the trade dispute between the world’s two largest economies. The Trump administration levied tariffs on an additional $200 billion of Chinese goods on Monday, while the government of Chinese President Xi Jinping retaliated by targeting roughly $60 billion worth of U.S. imports.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2NI7xoU Tyler Durden

The Marine Le Pen Case Shows That Supposedly Enlightened France Treats Political Speech As a Crime and a Symptom of Mental Illness

France ranked 12 notches above the United States in this year’s World Press Freedom Index, produced by Reporters Without Borders. But such ratings can be misleading, as illustrated by the prosecution of Marine Le Pen, head of the right-wing National Rally party (formerly the National Front), for posting images of ISIS atrocities on Twitter. Last week Le Pen revealed that she had been ordered to undergo a psychiatric examination as part of the investigation into her speech crime, which added another layer of Soviet-style thought control to the story.

It is inconceivable that an American politician, no matter how extreme his views, would be prosecuted for doing what Le Pen did, because a law like the one she is charged with violating would be clearly inconsistent with the First Amendment. That law, Article 227-24 of the French Criminal Code, makes it a crime, punishable by a fine of €75,000 (about $88,000) and up to three years in prison, to distribute “a message bearing a pornographic or violent character or a character seriously violating human dignity…where the message may be seen or perceived by a minor.” Le Pen allegedly ran afoul of that prohibition in 2015 by posting three pictures of men murdered by ISIS—one beheaded, one burned alive, and one run over by a tank—in response to a Twitter user who likened her party to the terrorist organization. “Daesh [the Arabic acronym for ISIS] is this!” she tweeted.

This case vividly illustrates why Article 227-24 would never pass constitutional muster in the United States. Le Pen’s tweet is indisputably political speech, sitting at the core of the expression protected by the First Amendment. The terms of Article 227-24 (especially the phrase “seriously violating human dignity”) are broad and vague, encouraging self-censorship and inviting politically motivated prosecution of people who irk the powers that be. Le Pen, who unsuccessfully ran against Emmanuel Macron in a presidential runoff last year, was stripped of her parliamentary immunity six months later, leaving her open to prosecution.

That decision also left Le Pen open to a court-ordered psychiatric assessment, which she says she will resist. The BBC describes the order as “standard procedure,” citing Le Parisen, which reports that prosecutors said “Article 706-47-1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure” provides the statutory authority for requiring an examination of Le Pen. Yet that provision applies only to people accused of “procuring concerning a minor,” “forcing a minor into prostitution,” and violent crimes such as sexual assault, “torture or acts of barbarity,” and murder of a child “accompanied by acts of rape.” It’s telling that Le Parisien saw nothing amiss about putting Le Pen’s “crime”—expressing her political views on Twitter—in the same category as rape, torture, and murder.

The notice that Le Pen received from Carole Bochter, the investigating judge handling the case, actually cites Article 161-1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a more general provision that authorizes judges to seek guidance from “experts” when they deem it “useful.” Ordering a psychiatric examination was a matter of discretion, in other words, notwithstanding the claim by Le Parisen, the BBC, and other media outlets that it was standard procedure or even required by law. That legal leeway lends plausibility to Le Pen’s complaint that the French government is taking a page from the Soviet playbook by treating political dissent as a mental illness.

The BBC says Bochter “wants the tests to determine if [Le Pen] suffers mental illness or is ‘capable of understanding remarks and answering questions.'” Le Parisien says “the expert in charge of this psychiatric examination is supposed to check whether Marine Le Pen was or was not ‘suffering from a psychic or neuropsychic disorder that impaired her discernment’ when she posted the photos.” The implication does seem to be, as Le Pen’s allies claim, that Bochter sees her political speech as a evidence of a mental disorder.

Article 227-24 is not the only way in which French law deviates from the Enlightenment values to which French officials pay lip service. In addition to Twitter posts about terrorism, French legislators have criminalized Holocaust denial, public display of Nazi symbols, and insults or incitement of hatred based on race, religion, ethnicity, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, or disability. All of these bans would be non-starters under U.S. constitutional law. Shouldn’t actual legal restrictions on speech carry more weight in a ranking of press freedom than Donald Trump’s dreams of silencing people who offend him?

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2QdaGKj
via IFTTT

Ray Dalio: America Has About 2 Years Until The Next Recession

Since stepping back from running Bridgewater Associates, Ray Dalio has apparently had a lot of free time to author LinkedIn posts and make the media rounds promoting his new e-book (available for free on Amazon) “A Template for Understanding Debt Crises”. The substance of these interviews has been pretty consistent: Dalio argues that we’re nearing the end of the business cycle (the seventh inning, to be precise) and that, while stocks probably have more time to ramp higher, investors hoping to invest for the long term should be cautious: Because the next downturn is, at most, a year or two away.

As any trader familiar with Dalio’s “1937 thesis” is no doubt aware, Dalio is a student of history. In many ways, the modern economy resembles that of the late 1930s: Still-low interest rates have pushed asset prices near full capacity, the wealth gap has widened, populism is ascendant and economic tensions are intensifying around the world (thanks in large part to Trump’s trade war with China, of course).

As Dalio explains in an interview with Business Insider’s Henry Blodget, although the economy is running at full steam, rising interest rates will put a damper on activity, eventually triggering the inevitable downturn. However, with the Fed’s monetary toolkit already largely spent and the US budget deficit already precariously wide, US policy makers will have few options to help revive the economy. The only solution, Dalio believes, is to make sure “capitalism works for everyone.” Otherwise, the US will be doomed to repeat the late 1930s, when the economy kept lapsing into recession until it was finally saved by full-scale industrial warfare.

As Dalio explains, he’s a firm believer in the “endless waltz” theory of capitalism, namely that investors, corporations and consumers will make the same mistakes over and over again, and that the only way we can prepare for these inevitable lapses is by studying the factors that have contributed to them in the past.

This was really research that was done before the 2008 financial crisis. And it lays out a template of how these things happened over and over again. In other words, I believe that the same things happen over and over again, and if you study the patterns of them, you understand the cause-effect relationships, and then, can write down principles for dealing with them well. We dealt with them very well in that financial crisis and in other debt crises, and I wanted to pass that template along.

As Dalio explains, there are six stages to every debt crisis:

  • “There’s the early part of the cycle where debt is being used to create productivity incomes and then, it can be serviced well, asset prices go up, everything is great.”
  • “And then, you come to the bubble phase of the cycle. And in that bubble phase, you’re in a position where everybody extrapolates the past. Because asset goes up, they think its assets are going to continue to rise. And you borrow money and they leverage. And when you are in that phase, when we do the calculations, you can start to see that maybe you won’t be able to sustain that level of debt growth.”
  • “Then, you come into the third phase of the cycle, which is the top. That’s typically the part of the cycle when central banks start to put on the brakes, tighten monetary policy, and the like.”
  • “Then, you come into the down leg…”
  • “…and when interest rates hit zero percent, you come into a depression part of that cycle because monetary policy doesn’t work normally when interest rates hit zero.”
  • “Then, you have to have quantitative easing and you begin that expansion. And then, you carry that along and you begin the cycle.”

These phases are illustrated in the chart below:

Debt

According to Dalio, there have only been two times during the last century where we had debt crises where interest rates were cut all the way to zero:

“There are only two times in the history of this century where we had debt crises in which interest rates hit zero. And in both of those times, the central bank had to print money and go to a different type of monetary policy, which we call quantitative easing, and to buy financial assets. And that drives up, in both of those cases, the value of those financial assets and produces a recovery, but it drives interest rates down to zero or near zero, where they are around the world. And that buying, in this case $15 trillion of financial assets, has pushed up financial assets and driven the interest rates down to zero, so it’s caused asset prices to rise. It’s also caused populism, more populism.”

While downturns are inevitable, the real risk arises when the wealth gap blows out…

“Because that process creates a gap between the rich and the poor. Those that have more financial assets see those asset prices go up. And for various other reasons, a wealth gap has developed. If you look at, right now, the top 10%, the top one tenth of 1% of the population’s net worth is equal, about, to the bottom 90% combined. That’s very similar to the late ’30s when we had that stimulation and so on.”

…And the levels of wealth inequality present today are very similar to the 1930s.

Debt

Wealth inequality, Dalio argues, breeds a populist reaction which has clearly manifested in the election of President Trump, Brexit and the enduring popularity of anti-establishment parties in Greece, Italy and elsewhere in Europe. This mirrors the rise of Communism in the Soviet Union and Facism (another type of populist movement) in Italy, Japan and Germany.

I think the cause-effect relationships are analogous, meaning that if you have a wealth gap and you have a downturn in the economy where you’re sharing the pie, how do you divide a budget, sharing the budget? There’s a risk that both sides are at odds with each other and there’s also a greater international risk in tensions. Economic tensions produce global tensions, for various reasons. So I think that, in this expansion, we’re about in the seventh inning of a nine-inning game, let’s say. We’re in the later part of the cycle, the part of cycle in which monetary policy is tightening and there’s not much capacity to squeeze out of the economy. And that, as interest rates tend to rise, if they rise faster than is discounted in the curve, it can hurt asset prices.

What’s really concerning for Dalio is the fact that, now as then, there are two powers vying for economic supremacy. In the 1930s, it was the US and the UK vs. Germany. Today, it’s the US and China.

But I think that that, what concerns me is that. It concerns me also internationally because the situation, internationally, is quite similar to the late ’30s, in that, in these periods of time, these geopolitical cycles, there is an established power and an emerging power that then, have a rivalry. At first, it’s an economic rivalry, and then, it can become quite antagonistic. So back then, the United States and England won World War I and we had the peace. But then, as there was a rising Germany and a rising Japan, there became that kind of economic rivalry that became more antagonistic. I think that we have a situation where there is a rising China, and the United States is an existing economic power, and there is a rivalry about that. And there can be an antagonism about that.

While Dalio stops short of forecasting the outbreak of World War III, he does have a few suggestions to avert a societal upheaval – and that’s to make sure that capitalism works for the majority of people. But creating more opportunities for middle- and working-class Americans, in Dalio’s estimation, would likely pay for itself as the American corporate sector would be rewarded with higher productivity, which has remained stubbornly low for two decades.

Well, I think one of the things is to make sure that capitalism works for the majority of people. To look at the bottom 60% of the population and use that as metrics to say, “Is that improving or not?” And how do you approach that wealth gap? It’s not just a wealth gap. I think that more important than the wealth gap is an opportunity gap, that people need to be made useful by being able to have jobs and so on. So I think that there should be — that should be considered, you know, an imperative.

Unlike analysts at BAML and other sell-side banks, who see dollar-denominated debt in the international corporate sector as a potential risk (just the fear of such a crisis has helped drive market routs in Turkey, Brazil and Argentina this year), Dalio is more concerned about the amount of dollar-denominated debt that the Treasury will need to sell to fund its deficits.

The private sector debt, for the most part, I don’t have much in the way of concerns for. When we do our pro forma financial numbers and we look at, we see pockets that will probably have problems servicing their debt. There’s a lot of cash around. I am concerned in about a two-year period about the amount of dollar-denominated debt that we’re going to have to sell abroad because we’re going to have to fund the deficits. And then, in addition, we’ll have our balance sheets, the Federal Reserve’s balance sheets go down. And that’ll involve a significant amount of selling of dollar-denominated debt.

Download Dalio’s e-book here. Read his full interview with BI’s Henry Blodget here.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2OZtgoI Tyler Durden

Texas Attorney General Ignores 75 Years of Supreme Court Rulings Trying to Force a Student to Stand for the Pledge

A.G. Ken PaxtonTexas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s website says “Liberty and Justice for Texas” in big letters at the top. He seems to have a funny idea of what “liberty” means, though. He thinks the State of Texas can force students to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance.

India Landry, 18, was expelled from a high school in Katy, Texas, because she has repeatedly refused to stand for the Pledge. Landry is suing the school district in federal court, arguing violations of her civil rights. Now Paxton, as the state’s top prosecutor, is asking to intervene in the federal case.

To say that court precedent is on Landry’s side may understate things. A Supreme Court decision from all the way back in 1943 makes it very clear that public schools cannot force students to salute the flag or recite the pledge.

You might expect that as the state’s attorney general, Paxton would be defending Landry’s free speech rights here. Nope: He wants to argue that Landry cannot refuse to stand for the flag without her parent’s permission. It seems that Texas schools have opt-out forms that parents are expected to sign to give children “permission” to not stand. In a press release, he claims, quite incorrectly, “School children cannot unilaterally refuse to participate in the pledge.”

Landry’s mother is supporting her lawsuit, which makes Paxton’s approach more than a little strange. Even stranger is the Supreme Court precedents he’s attempting to use in his motion to justify his position. He quotes Texas v. Johnson and Spence v. Washington, in which the Court said, “there is a special place reserved for the flag in this Nation, and thus we do not doubt that the government has a legitimate interest in making efforts to ‘preserv[e] the national flag as an unalloyed symbol of our country.'” But this quote comes from a Supreme Court case affirming the right to desecrate the flag as a form of protected speech! The decision specifically forbids the government from punishing citizens for disrespecting the flag.

This unconstitutional wankery can be explained by election-year politics and by the fact that Landry is reportedly refusing to stand for the pledge to show her support for kneeling NFL players. In other words, Paxton is supporting the school district punishing a black student for participating in a protest that is fundamentally about how people in authority abuse their power to punish black people.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2Oddd9S
via IFTTT

Francis Fukuyama Says Identity Politics Are Killing America and Empowering Donald Trump: Podcast

Since the publication of his 1989 essay “The End of History?,” no political scientist has been more influential in discussions of global democracy than Francis Fukuyama. In the years since then, the Stanford professor has authored a shelf full of prescient and commanding texts, including The End of History and the Last Man, Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creaton of Prosperity, and Our Post-Human Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. (In 2002, he debated biophysicist Gregory Stock in the pages at Reason on the advisability of human cloning; read their exchange here and here.)

Once a neoconservative who staunchly believed in military intervention and nation building, Fukuyama has been chastened by the failure of U.S. foreign policy since 9/11 and has renounced his early support for the invasion and occupation in Iraq. In his new book Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment, he argues that the rise of populism, nationalism, and grievance cultures based on racial, ethnic, and gender identity both here and abroad are undermining the basis of liberal democracy and threaten economic prosperity and peace. “Every single one of these struggles is justified,” Fukuyama told The Chronicle of Higher Education recently. “The problem is in the way we interpret injustice and how we try to solve it, which tends to fragment society.”

I spoke with Fukuyama about Identity, whether it’s possible to create a national identity that is capable of bringing Americans of all sorts together without becoming oppressive and stultifying, and why he believes that a Democratic win in the midterm elections is essential to checking what he sees as the authoritarian tendencies of Donald Trump.

Subscribe, rate, and review our podcast at iTunes. Listen at SoundCloud below:

Don’t miss a single Reason Podcast! (Archive here.)

Subscribe at iTunes.

Follow us at SoundCloud.

Subscribe at YouTube.

Like us on Facebook.

Follow us on Twitter.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2xF5Iz7
via IFTTT

Why Are So Many People Talking About The Potential For A Stock Market Crash In October?

Authored by Michael Snyder via The Economic Collapse blog,

It is that time of the year again.  Every year, people start talking about a possible stock market crash in October, because everyone remembers the historic crashes that took place in October 1987 and October 2008.  Could we witness a similar stock market crash in October 2018? 

Without a doubt, the market is primed for another crash Stock valuations have been in crazytown territory for a very long time, and financial chaos has already begun to erupt in emerging markets all over the globe.  When the stock market does collapse, it won’t exactly be a surprise.  And a lot of people out there are pointing to October for historical reasons.  I did not know this, but it turns out that the month with the most market volatility since the Dow was first established has been the month of October

The difference is quite significant, as judged by a measure of volatility known as the standard deviation: For all Octobers since 1896, when the Dow Jones Industrial Average was created, the standard deviation of the Dow’s daily changes has been 1.44%. That compares to 1.05% for all months other than October.

Like me, you are probably tempted to think that the reason why October’s number is so high is because of what happened in 1987 and 2008.

But even if you pull out those two months, October is still the most volatile

You might think that this difference is caused by a few outliers, such as the 1987 crash (which, of course, occurred in October) or 2008 (the Dow suffered several thousand-point plunges that month as it reacted to the snowballing financial crisis). But you would be wrong: The standard deviation of daily Dow changes is much higher in October than other months even if we eliminate 1987 and 2008 from the sample.

Once we get to Thanksgiving, the market tends to get sleepy, and it usually doesn’t wake up again until the new year begins.

So if something big is going to happen in the market in 2018, it is probably going to happen in the coming weeks.

And it is inevitable that something big will happen at some point.  As Jesse Colombo has pointed out, stocks are more overvalued right now than they were just before the great stock market crash of 1929…

In a bubble, the stock market becomes overpriced relative to its underlying fundamentals such as earnings, revenues, assets, book value, etc. The current bubble cycle is no different: the U.S. stock market is as overvalued as it was at major generational peaks. According to the cyclically-adjusted price-to-earnings ratio (a smoothed price-to-earnings ratio), the U.S. stock market is more overvalued than it was in 1929, right before the stock market crash and Great Depression

It is becoming increasingly obvious what we are heading for, and a growing chorus of market experts are issuing ominous declarations about this market.

For example, David Tice is warning that “we’re getting closer to a meltdown scenario”

According to investor David Tice, who made a name for himself in running the Prudent Bear Fund before selling it to Federated Investors in 2008, the current market is dangerous. Tice was quoted as saying he’s “nervous” because “we’re getting closer to a meltdown scenario.”

And John Hussman ultimately expects “two-thirds of market capitalization” to vanish…

I am aware of no plausible conditions under which current extremes are likely to work out well for investors. There are a few possibilities that could involve a smaller loss than the two-thirds of market capitalization that I expect to vanish, as the run-of-the-mill, baseline expectation for the S&P 500 over the completion of this cycle. Yet it’s worth recognizing that the completion of every market cycle in history has taken the most reliable valuation measures we identify (those best correlated with actual subsequent S&P 500 market returns) to less than half of current levels.

Could you imagine the chaos that would be unleashed if the stock market went down by two-thirds?

That would make what happened in 2008 look like a Sunday picnic.

And there are a lot of parallels between what happened in 2008 and what is happening today.  For example, the housing market is slowing down dramatically just like it did a decade ago.  The following comes from a Bloomberg article that I came across earlier today entitled “Builders Slump as U.S. Housing Market Shifts to the Slow Lane”

The housing market is stalling, and homebuilder stocks are feeling the pain.

The S&P Supercomposite Homebuilding Index is down 21 percent year-to-date, on track for the biggest annual drop since 2008, when it fell 32 percent. That’s even with tax cuts, unemployment near the lowest since 1969 and a real-estate developer in the White House. What gives?

Just a few days ago, I wrote an entire article about the fact that home sellers are cutting prices at the fastest rate that we have seen in eight years The housing market is clearly telling us that a big time economic slowdown is coming, but most people are not listening.

Switching gears, we have also recently learned that it looks like Ford Motor Company will soon be laying off lots of workers

Ford Motor employees are warily awaiting details of CEO Jim Hackett’s promised “fitness” plan and the serious possibility of significant job losses as the company faces pressure to improve its operations.

The company has warned of $11 billion in restructuring costs over three to five years, which could mean thousands of worker buyouts, according to analysts.

Why would they be doing that if the economy really was in “good shape”?

And let us not forget about the ongoing woes of the retail industry.  Recently, I was astounded to learn that a whopping 20 percent of all retail space in Manhattan is currently vacant

“When you walk the streets, you see vacancies on every block in all five boroughs, rich or poor areas — even on Madison Avenue, where you used to have to fight to get space,” said Faith Hope Consolo, head of retail leasing for Douglas Elliman Real Estate, who said the increase in storefront vacancies in New York City had created “the most challenging retail landscape in my 25 years in real estate.”

A survey conducted by Douglas Elliman found that about 20 percent of all retail space in Manhattan is currently vacant, she said, compared with roughly 7 percent in 2016.

New York City is one of the few areas around the country that has actually been prospering.

If things are that bad there already, what does that say about the outlook for the rest of the nation?

The truth is that the economy is not nearly as good as you are being told, and things could literally start breaking loose at any moment.

Unfortunately, as a society we have not learned very much from history, and most Americans seem to think that this bubble of artificial prosperity is going to last indefinitely.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2OPWjLt Tyler Durden

Un-“Accommodative” Fed Sparks Stock-Buying But Dollar, Bonds, & Gold Shrug

Plenty of kneejerk reactions in bonds and FX but all of that has disappeared now leaving Treasury yields and the Dollar Index practically unch since The Fed – however, stocks found something to love and are higher…

Bonds Unch…

Dollar Unch…

But stocks loved it… but are starting to catch down to bond/FX reality…

 

 

 

 

 

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2zvA6gH Tyler Durden

Watch Live: Jay Powell Explains Why The Market Doesn’t Believe The Fed

Surprise! A 25bps rate hike – anticipated by 99.9% of the market – has come and gone and the dot plots adjusted to The Fed ‘seers’ new forecasts, and still the US markets are throwing shade – entirely shunning The Fed’s outlook for rates. We’re sure Jay Powell can clear up any confusion…

 

Live Feed due to start at 1430ET…

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Q8KuR2 Tyler Durden

The Fed Hikes Rates For The 8th Time, Tilts Hawkish By Ending “Accommodative” Era

The Fed’s eight rate-hike since 2015 was perhaps the most anticipated yet, and Jay Powell did not let investors down, delivering the 25bps hike everyone expected.

And so it was – but all eyes were on the dot plots and the language changes in the statement. As Bloomberg noted, Fed policy makers face two important decisions at their September meeting: One, whether to retain optionality around a potential fourth interest-rate increase in December; and, two, the appropriate policy trajectory as rates approach neutral.

Here are the Key Takeaways from the Fed report:

  • Only meaningful change in FOMC’s statement is removal of the sentence on maintaining “accommodative” policy.

  • The overview of the economy is same as August statement: labor market continues to strengthen, activity “strong.’

New forecasts:

  • Fed sees 2018 economic growth at 3.1%, a noticeable upgrade from the 2.8% it saw in June, without any expected breakout in inflation.

  • Long-run growth outlook sees economy settled back to 1.8% GDP expansion in 2021.

  • Median estimate of long-run neutral rate ticks up to 3% from 2.9% in June

  • *FED DOTS SHOW 12 OF 16 OFFICIALS FAVOR FOUR RATE HIKES IN 2018

  • *FED MEDIAN ESTIMATE STILL SHOWS THREE RATE HIKES IN 2019

The shift from June to September:

 

*  *  *

Full Redline below:

*  *  *

For some context of just how easy financial conditions are (or put another way, just how much room The Fed has to tighten without potentially pulling the plug on the party), The Bloomberg U.S. Financial Conditions Index – a gauge of financial-market health based on stock, bond and money markets – is approaching the highest levels since 2007…

Ahead of the rate-hike, and dot-lot adjustment, the markets remain dramatically underimpressed by The Fed’s rate trajectory forecast (though we note that FF futs are now flat in 2020 while OIS still sees a potential rate cut)…

IIF’s Robin Brooks points out the 3 key numbers for today’s Fed:

(i) 2.9% estimate for neutral (blue);

(ii) 2020 end-point of 3.4%, i.e. restrictive policy (black); and

(iii) market pricing of 2.8% for 2020 (red).

Neutral (blue) may start moving up today and more next year, which will pull up the red line.

Since The Fed hiked rates in June, the Treasury curve has seen yields rise notably…

But the Yield curve has collapsed…

And the dollar has largely traded sideways…

So despite its apparently hawkish tilt in June – The Dollar has gone nowhere and the yield curve has collapsed – seems like The Fed needs to get the market on board soon.

And cue the “Goldilocks” word before the close…

via RSS https://ift.tt/2xEtISG Tyler Durden