Sweden Manhunt Underway After Car Accelerates Into ‘Crowd Of 100 Children And Teachers’

Police in Sweden have launched a manhunt after an assailant drove a car through a large crowd of approximately 100 children and 10 teachers, according to the Daily Express

A spokesman for Sweden’s police service said that children “threw themselves” out of the way of the car, which “accelerated into the group of students and teachers,” injuring two. 

“He drove into two of the students. One was injured on the wrist and possibly the other student was also injured,” said the spokesman. 

Police are searching for any information on the incident, which occurred at approximately 1pm local time as the group from Mjallby secondary school was walking from Hinnedalsvagen to Grundsjon for a reported social event. 

The vehicle is described as a “black or dark blue Saab” which was traveling at around 25 miles per hour when it drove into the crowd. The driver immediately fled the scene, and witnesses were unable to say if it was a man or a women. 

Last April, three people were killed and eight injured when a truck ran into a crowd on a Stockholm street in what authorities described as an act of terrorism. 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2QYAoDy Tyler Durden

“Can You ‘Feel’ The Complacency?”

Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

Yesterday, the market sold off modestly over continuing concerns of “tariffs” and trade wars. At least that was the headline reason. The real reason was simply that the market is overbought in the short-term and traders were taking profits in a light-volume session. As shown in the chart below, the sell-off yesterday is now turning previous resistance, when the market broke out to new highs, into support. As long as the market holds here over the next few days, we continue to expect a further, albeit bumpy, advance to 3000 by year-end.

In this past weekend’s missive, I wrote:

However, between now and then, the markets will likely continue to try and push higher as investor confidence continues to swell, pushing investors to take on ever increasing levels of risk, particularly as it appears as if the economy is firing on all cylinders…

With the move in portfolios back to full target allocations, there is not much for us to do right now except to remain on the lookout for the risks which could rapidly take away our performance…At the moment, we are in good shape just to sit back and ‘watch the show.’”

Interestingly, that statement triggered an interesting email:

“Can you feel the complacency in your weekly newsletter? Just sayin’…kinda eerie. I know you know the risks, but to say at this point we need to sit back and ‘just watch the show’ as the S&P plows on to 3000 and beyond. It sort of puts you on the same side of the crowded ship with everyone else. How many times have you ingrained when everyone agrees something is going to happen, something else likely will.”

No, I haven’t abandoned all reason.

In the short-term, we have to participate with the “running of the bull” as long as possible. This isn’t the first time, that I have discussed being long-biased in portfolios. Here is what I recommended previously:

“Risk taken when valuations are rich and market action is poor can produce losses that entirely cancel the successful investment actions of other periods. Though periods of unfavorable valuation and market action can occasionally produce positive returns as well, they don’t produce positive returns reliably enough to justify the risk.

We continue to believe that bonds will continue to outperform stocks as they have most of the time over the last seven years and that stock market speculators will pay the price for overpaying for stocks.

However, for now, you need to be invested in the market and take advantage of this oversold rally. It will look and feel like we are entering a new bull market leg. The media will cheer it, they will ‘poo-poo’ the bears, and they will ensure you that the worst is behind you. It won’t be.”

By the way, that was on December 1st, 2007.

There are a lot of similarities between today and 2007.

Bullish trends were solidly in place.

And, just as in 2007, there was a clear preference of equities over bonds as well.

Of course, speculative fervor should not be surprising given the economy is of the LEAST concern since 2007 according to a recent Gallup survey.

Individuals are not only overly confident in the economy, but they are even MORE confident of “forward returns over the next 12-months” than they were in 2007, and only slightly shy of 1999.

And overall consumer confidence was only higher in 1969 and 1999. (The confidence composite is the average of both the University of Michigan and Census Bureau surveys.)

Of course, all of these indicators, when at similar previous levels, preceded some of the largest mean reverting events in the history of the financial markets.

Will this time be different.

Not likely.

But that doesn’t mean it all falls apart today. Tomorrow. Or even next month.

The one thing about bullish sentiment is that it begets more bullish sentiment. The more the market rises, the more ingrained the belief comes that it can only go higher. In a “Pavlovian” manner, as each “dip” is bought, the “fear” of loss is eliminated repeatedly teaching investors they should “only buy” and “never sell.”

This cycle can, does, and will last longer, and go farther, than logic would dictate.

This is why, as I noted over the weekend, we remain bullishly biased in portfolios for now.

We are well aware of the present risk. Stop loss levels have been moved up to recent lows and we continue to monitor developments on a daily basis. With the trend of the market positive, we want to continue to participate to book in performance now for a ‘rainy day’ later.”

That “rainy day” is coming.

Just as it was in 2007. While market participants were all “giddy” about the prospects for the markets and a “Goldilocks economy,” there was a laundry list of things that had begun to issue warnings signals.

Currently, we have a growing list of warnings which are being quickly dismissed, and “priced in,” by the markets such as:

  • Growing divergences between the U.S. and abroad

  • Peak autos, peak housing, peak GDP.

  • Political instability and a crucial midterm election.

  • The failure of fiscal policy to ‘trickle down.’

  • An important pivot towards restraint in global monetary policy.

  • An unprecedented lack of coordination between super-powers.

  • Short-term note yields now eclipse the S&P dividend yield.

  • A record levels of private and public debt.

  •  Near $3 trillion of covenant light and/or sub-prime corporate debt. (eerily reminiscent of the size of the subprime mortgages outstanding in 2007)

  • Narrowing leadership in the market.

But, for now, this “wall of worry” has yielded little concern.

The more the market rises, the more reinforced the belief “this time is different” becomes.

As I wrote previously:

“This is why we have been saying for the last two weeks – the market is rising and you need to be invested…FOR NOW. However, this is not the next great leg of a bull market so this will be a good rally to liquidate positions into and begin setting your portfolio up for more protectionary investments going into [next year].”

That was on December 7, 2007.

Are we complacent?

Absolutely not.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Dszso4 Tyler Durden

Verizon Wireless Network Suffers Massive Outage Across US

Verizon Wireless, the largest mobile telecommunications provider in the US, has been experiencing massive outages, with the East Coast and Southern US reportedly hit the hardest, according to RT.

“We are currently experiencing an intermittent voice, text and data services interruption for customers in some markets in the south. Our engineers are aware of the issue and are working diligently to resolve it,” the telecom giant’s Support Service posted on Twitter.

Verizon Customer Service was busy answering customer complaints on twitter:

As of 3:20 pm ET, service in large swaths of the outage area had yet to be restored.

Verizon

Check back for updates…

 

 

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Dunla1 Tyler Durden

WTF Chart Of The Day: Blue Apron Shares Explode After ‘Mr.Wonderful’ Jokes On CNBC

Seriously…

Having won last year’s fantasy stock picking competition on CNBC, Kevin O’Leary (aka Mr.Wonderful) appears on the show today to explain why he is in last place.

Amid some frivolity, he admitted his big holding was Blue Apron and joked that in a worst case he would buy the company, to get the share price up in his fantasy game…

This happened!!!

O’Leary was quick to say “just kidding” but by then it was too later and 3.5 million shares had traded, sending the stock price up over 10%.

Paging the SEC… did O’Leary just have his “funding secured” moment?

via RSS https://ift.tt/2xP1mom Tyler Durden

Iran’s Rouhani Blasts US For “Nazi Disposition,” Dares Trump To “Return To Negotiating Table”

In what sounded like a last-ditch plea for the US to reconsider its abandonment of the JCPOA, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani urged the US during his speech before the United Nations General Assembly not to abandon its commitments to international institutions and asked it to return to the negotiating table.

Without using Trump’s name, Rouhani warned of rulers who have “xenophobic tendencies resembling a Nazi disposition”, and claimed that “those seeking dominance and hegemony are enemies of peace and perpetrators of war.” He added that the US government “seems determined to render all international institutions ineffectual”. Its decision to abandon the Security Council-sanctioned JCPOA while inviting Iran to engage in bilateral talks is one such example of this.

Rouhani

Rouhani continued, saying that while he’s glad that the rest of the international community has stuck to the agreement, the US’s decision to abandon the agreement is exemplary of a pattern propagated by the US to defy international norms when it doesn’t suit the US’s interests.

“According to this resolution, all countries and regional organizations were called upon to support the JCPOA and refrain from actions that undermine implementation of commitments. Based on 12 consecutive reports from the IAEA Iran has complied with its commitments. However, the US never remained faithful to its obligations, and accused Trump of making “flimsy excuses” in violation of its commitments.”

He added that while Iran seeks nothing but peace, the US is an authoritarian regime that believes in “might makes right” over the rule of law. However, Iran believes that there is no better way but dialogue.

“The US understanding of international relations is authoritarian. Its understanding is might makes right..it’s understanding of power, not of legal authority, is reflected in bullying, not in legal imposition. No state and nation can be brought to the negotiating table by force. And if so, what follows is an accumulation of the grapes of wrath to be reaped later by the oppressors.

Rouhani exhorted the US to drop its sanctions threats and “return to the negotiating table”, adding that if the administration dislikes the Iran deal because of its association to Obama, that it could remake that legacy by returning to the table.

“We invite you to come back to the negotiating table you left. If you dislike the JCPOA because it is the legacy of your domestic political rivals then we invite you to come back to the Security Council resolution. Do not engage in imposing sanctions…sanctions and extremism are two sides of the same coin.”

Here are some of the key headlines from Rouhani’s 25-minute address (via Bloomberg):

  • *ROUHANI: PLEASED INTL COMMUNITY DIDN’T ACQUIESCE TO U.S.
  • *ROUHANI: THOSE SEEKING DOMINANCE ARE PERPETRATORS OF WAR
  • *ROUHANI: U.S. LEADERS SEEK TO UNDERMINE INTERNATIONAL LAW
  • *ROUHANI: UN SHOULDN’T BOW TO SOME MEMBER STATE PROPAGANDA
  • *ROUHANI: UNLAWFUL UNILATERAL SANCTIONS ARE ECONOMIC TERRORISM
  • *ROUHANI: PLEASED INTL COMMUNITY DIDN’T ACQUIESCE TO U.S.
  • *ROUHANI: U.S. TARGETS IRANIAN PEOPLE WITH UNLAWFUL SANCTIONS
  • *ROUHANI: U.S. POLICY TOWARD IRAN HAS BEEN WRONG FROM BEGINNING
  • *ROUHANI: U.S. UNDERSTANDING OF INTL RELATIONS IS AUTHORITARIAN
  • *ROUHANI: U.S. INTL RELATIONS IS REFLECTED IN POWER AND BULLYING
  • *ROUHANI: IRAN WILL CONTINUE TO CONFRONT `GENUINE TERRORISM’
  • *ROUHANI: IRAN SUPPORTS PEACE AND DEMOCRACY IN ENTIRE MID EAST
  • *ROUHANI URGES U.S. TO STAY IN INTL INSTITUTIONS, NOT SANCTIONS
  • *ROUHANI: SANCTIONS AND EXTREMISM TWO SIDES OF SAME COIN
  • *ROUHANI: IRAN HAS WARNED AGAINST FOREIGN INTERVENTION IN SYRIA
  • *ROUHANI: SYRIA ISSUE CAN ONLY BE RESOLVED INTERNALLY
  • *ROUHANI: CATASTROPHE IN YEMEN ARE CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
  • *ROUHANI: MOST PRESSING QUESTION IN MIDDLE EAST IS ON PALESTINE
  • *ROUHANI SAYS U.S. EMBASSY MOVE TO JERUSALEM `ABHORRENT’
  • *ROUHANI: ISRAEL BLATANTLY THREATENS OTHERS W/ NUCLEAR WEAPONS
  • *ROUHANI: IRAN DOES NOT SEEK WAR WITH ANY COUNTRY
  • *ROUHANI: IRAN DOES NOT NEED AN EMPIRE, IRAN IS AN EMPIRE
  • *ROUHANI: IRAN HAS WARNED AGAINST FOREIGN INTERVENTION IN SYRIA
  • *ROUHANI: SYRIA ISSUE CAN ONLY BE RESOLVED INTERNALLY
  • *ROUHANI: QUIT IMPOSING SANCTIONS AND END EXTREMISM

* * *

Watch Rouhani’s speech below:

Rouhani also gave an interview to NBC’s Lester Holt on Monday. Watch that below:

via RSS https://ift.tt/2N0eJHH Tyler Durden

The White House Has A Step-By-Step “Program Of Escalation” For Venezuela

The White House has prepared an intelligence blueprint for regime change in Venezuela, according to a bombshell Monday evening report in Axios

According to the report, which follows a New York Times story from early this month that confirmed the administration had previously established a “clandestine channel” involving covert meetings with Venezuelan military coup plotters targeting President Nicolás Maduro, the White House has prepared for multiple scenarios involving dramatic military escalation that could trigger US invasion of the small Latin American country.

Per Axios

The White House National Security Council drafted a step-by-step “program of escalation” for Venezuela after President Trump took office, including the grounds for military intervention, a former senior official said today.

The plans were revealed by Fernando Cutz, who was a top adviser to former National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster and the top National Security Council official on South America, while speaking at an event at the Wilson Center. 

Cutz said he was part of a working group to lay out potential scenarios of escalating crises in Venezuela and corresponding options detailing the US reaction to events. 

Among the scenarios Cutz outlined included the potential for a Venezuelan military assault and takeover of the US embassy in Caracas, or a massacre of 1,000 civilians which could trigger an America military response on humanitarian grounds

However Cutz voiced skepticism over the success of many of the plans, questioning what would come the day after if a coup d’état or even complete regime collapse were to occur.

According to Axios,

He said other steps the White House “had ready” included a full oil embargo, which would severely restrict Venezuela’s cashflow but presented the question: “If we destroy Venezuela, and we make the situation worse for the people of Venezuela, what comes next?” They didn’t have a satisfactory answer.

Concerning prior reports that Trump White House officials had previously met with Venezuelan military coup plotters to discuss potential support for fomenting regime change:

Cutz was asked about the meetings and said the White House “never debated supporting a coup” or offered support or tacit approval to coup plotters, but was “open to listening” to “any significant players.” He also said he had “no idea” why Trump had mentioned military action, adding that it “wasn’t in the script.”

Several secret meetings between the Trump administration and Venezuelan military officers reportedly took place to talk about potential coup plans, but according to administration sources “the coup plans stalled”. The meetings were said to have been spearheaded by someone simply described as a “career diplomat”.

According to the New York Times reporting in early September, “American officials did not provide material support, and the plans unraveled after a recent crackdown that led to the arrest of dozens of the plotters.” The secret talks were reportedly dropped and the mutinous officers on their own. 

Meanwhile Cutz suggested that if things got bad enough in Venezuela, citing a refugee crisis that could possibly swell to 5 million displaced, or a coup scenario or mass uprising, Trump could take steps to intervene: “the least bloody of those is probably going to be a foreign military intervention,” he said, echoing the usual pro-regime change Washington calculus. 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2O8Lnf4 Tyler Durden

Understanding The Volatility Storm To Come, Part 3: The Medium Is Liquidity… And It’s Vanishing

Authored by Christopher Cole via Artemis Capital Management,

Read Part 1: Fragility In The Market’s Medium, here…

Read Part 2: Volatility Reflexivity and Liquidity, here…

…what made February so scary is that the very medium of the markets… the water… the liquidity… vanished. Every fish was on dry land. Look at the charts below from NANEX showing tick-by-tick liquidity of S&P 500 index E-minis for visual evidence of the stark deterioration. The average number of S&P 500 e-mini contracts to be bought and sold at the best price collapsed 95% from late-2017 to February-March 2018. From our trading desk we observed that moving just 200 E-minis, representing just $26mm of S&P 500 index delta exposure, could have caused a $22 trillion market to move multiple handles, up or down. YIKES!

The liquidity crisis in February extended beyond derivatives. The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (“SPY”) is one of the most liquid exchange traded funds in the world with a capitalization of over $260 billion. Normally this ETF trades very tightly with an average bid-ask spread of only 1 cent. On February 5-6th the average spread blew out to historical highs of over 2 cents wide, representing a 28 standard deviation move. 

SPX options had no bids or offers and option spreads that previously traded 5 cents the previous week went as much as $3.00+ wide. In a throwback to the 2008 financial crisis, the derivatives desks at major banks refused to provide quotes on liquidity over-the-counter derivatives like variance swaps. At a recent conference, one veteran hedge fund manager said that it was one of the worst liquidity environments he had seen in 26 years of trading.

The bull-market in the S&P 500 index is now the second longest and second greatest percentage gain in history, but it is the ONLY bull-market in history that has occurred on lower and lower trading volume. 

Market trading volume and free float shares are now at levels last seen in the late-1990s (as evidenced by the chart below).

In the U.S. stock market more than half of the 8,500 listed companies now trade less than 100,000 shares per day.

The volatility revolution will not be televised… the volatility revolution will be live.

The liquidity in February was horrible, but what is even more alarming is the fact that it happened outside a true fundamentally driven market crash. Now a -4.10% loss is a bad day, but any student of market history knows things can get much much worse.  For example, in October and December 2008, there were 15 days with declines greater than -4% including 2 days down more than -9%! In 2011 the market dropped nearly -7% in one day, and famously the market was down -9% and -21% on consecutive days in October 1987. The question we need to ask ourselves, what if a liquidity evaporation similar to February 2018 occurs during a period of actual systemic stress? 

In the short term the liquidity fluctuations have made it very difficult for the entire volatility trading edifice. For the first time in history all actively managed volatility hedge fund strategies are down on the year.  The CBOE Long Volatility Hedge Fund Index (-4.92%), Relative Value Volatility Index (-0.59%), Short Volatility Index (-8.87%), and Tail Risk Index (-4.03%) all lost money through the first half of 2018. This has never happened before.

Volatility this year has been like the Incredible Hulk… a well-tempered scientist one minute, then without warning transforming into a giant rage monster the next, only to shrink back down to human size soon thereafter. Volatility moving violently up and down without a defined trend is really difficult for everyone. For evidence, notice that volatility-of-VIX as a ratio to spot-VIX reached all-time highs in 2018.

If your mandate is to hold exposure to vol (long or short) you’ve been hurt either on the upswing or the reversal. Despite media attention, although the VIX has risen from all-time low levels in 2017, it is still trending well below historic averages in the midteens. 

As repeated in our mid-February update, Artemis Vega does not monetize into volatility spikes. If we took a +15% gain in February when the market drew down -10%,  we would not be able to achieve our objectives of portfolio changing 50-100%+ gains in the event a true crash emerged (SPX down -20% or more with an extended period of volatility).

* * *

Part 4 (Final): Flows Over Fundamentals – How This Ends, coming soon…

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Oedeu6 Tyler Durden

Twitter Implementing European-Style Hate Speech Bans

Jack DorseyTwitter’s leadership announced this morning that it is broadening its bans on “hateful” conduct to try to cut down on “dehumanizing” behavior.

The social media platform already bans (or attempts to ban, anyway) speech that targets an individual on the basis of race, sex, sexual orientation, and a host of other characteristics. Now it intends to crack down on broader, non-targeted speech that dehumanizes classes of people for these characteristics.

Here’s how the company’s blog post describes the new rules:

You may not dehumanize anyone based on membership in an identifiable group, as this speech can lead to offline harm.

Definitions:

Dehumanization: Language that treats others as less than human. Dehumanization can occur when others are denied of human qualities (animalistic dehumanization) or when others are denied of human nature (mechanistic dehumanization). Examples can include comparing groups to animals and viruses (animalistic), or reducing groups to their genitalia (mechanistic).

Identifiable group: Any group of people that can be distinguished by their shared characteristics such as their race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, serious disease, occupation, political beliefs, location, or social practices.

Directly under that rule, they ask for feedback. If you find this definition vague, you can let them know. They actually ask for examples of how this rule could be misapplied to punish “speech that contributes to a healthy conversation.” Feel free to fill them in.

As a private platform, Twitter can decide that it does not want to make space for speech it finds unacceptable. Newspapers and other media outlets have often declined to run letters to the editor or otherwise provide platforms for speech that uses such “dehumanizing” language. It’s their right to do so.

To the extent that there’s a “but” here, it’s about how toxic the political discussion on Twitter has already become. A large number of people actively try to get other people banned for saying things they don’t like, flopping and shrieking like pro soccer players at every piece of criticism they don’t like in hopes of drawing out a red card from a ref. If you add to the reasons that Twitter will censor tweets and shut down accounts, surely you’ll just increase the volume of people shrieking at Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey demanding that he and Twitter do something.

Also, while this new rule is a product of the creepily-named Trust and Safety Council that Twitter organized in 2016, its language echoes the broad anti–hate speech laws of the European Union and United Kingdom. This morning Andrea O’Sullivan noted that the European Union is attempting to regulate what online companies permit and forbid. It’s a lot harder to see what Twitter is doing as a voluntary reaction to consumer pressure when we know that there is additional governmental efforts to try to force them to censor users. And it won’t just be ordinary citizens who use this rule to yell at Twitter and demand they shut down speech they don’t like. Politicians certainly will as well.

Both Twitter’s blog post and Wired‘s coverage of the rule change point to the research of Susan Benesch of The Dangerous Speech Project as an inspiration for the new rule. Yet while one might think an organization that says certain types of speech are actually dangerous would be pro-censorship, that’s not really what the group is about.

While The Dangerous Speech Project does say that “inhibiting” dangerous, dehumanizing speech is one way to prevent the spread of messages meant to encourage violence and hatred toward targeted groups, that’s not what the group is actually encouraging. It says outright that efforts to fight “dangerous” speech “must not infringe upon freedom of speech since that is a fundamental right.” It adds that “when people are prevented from expressing their grievances, they are less likely to resolve them peacefully and more likely to resort to violence.”

The Dangerous Speech Project calls instead for engaging and countering bad speech with good speech. In fact, last year Benesch co-wrote an article specifically warning against online Twitter mobs that attempt to shame or retaliate against people in real life for the things that they’ve said, even when those things are full-on racist. When naming-and-shaming is used as a social tactic to suppress speech, she notes, it often ends up with the majority oppressing minorities. And besides, it doesn’t really work:

Shaming is a familiar strategy for enforcing social norms, but online shaming often goes farther, reaching into a person’s offline life to inflict punishment, such as losing a job. Tempting though it is, identifying and punishing people online should not become the primary method of regulating public discourse, since this can get out of hand in various ways. It can inflict too much pain, sometimes on people who are mistakenly identified—and in all cases it is unlikely to change the targets’ minds favorably.

It’s a little odd to see this group’s work being used to justify suppressing people’s tweets.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2IiqoBa
via IFTTT

Trump’s Messy Messaging on Iran: New at Reason

|||Robin Utrecht/Sipa USA/Newscom While President Donald Trump geared up for his address on Iran at the United Nations Tuesday, his National Security Adviser John Bolton headed to Fox News to preview the talk. In Bolton’s telling, Trump would cover “the continuing threat of Iran, not just on the nuclear side, but in aggressive, militaristic behavior in the region that puts us at risk” of great power conflict in the Middle East.

“We want massive changes in behavior by the regime in Iran,” Bolton said. “And if they don’t undertake that, they will face more consequences, because we will find more sanctions to impose and other ways to put maximum pressure on them.”

Bolton was not the only Trump team member to discuss Iran in the run-up to Trump’s speech—Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley, and even the president’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, all weighed in. Collectively, they paint a muddled picture of the administration’s policy toward Tehran—a picture the president’s Tuesday morning speech did not meaningfully clarify—leaving recklessly unsettled the question of whether U.S.-orchestrated regime change is on the Trump agenda, writes Bonnie Kristian in her latest piece at Reason.

View this article.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2NESBbe
via IFTTT

Trump Blasts “Totally Inebriated” And “All Messed Up” Second Kavanaugh Accuser; Then Does Schumer Impression

President Trump was highly dismissive of a second woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of waving his penis in her face at a drunken Yale party while she was heavily inebriated. 

Trump made the comments during press Q&A after meeting with Colombian President Ivan Duque Marquez at the United Nations. 

When asked about the allegations by the woman, Deborah Ramirez – an official with a women’s rights group, Trump dismissed her account as a “con game” by Democrats, and pointed out her admitted lapses in memory and inebriated state.

Reporter: “Should the second accuser be allowed to testify on Thursday?”

Trump: I look at the second accuser, the second accuser has nothing. The second accuser doesn’t even know – se thinks maybe it could have been him, maybe not. She admits that she was drunk. She admits time lapses. This is a person and this is a series of statements that would take one of the most talented – one of the greatest intellects, from a judicial standpoint, in our country – going to keep him off the United States Supreme Court? 

Turning to Kavanaugh and his family’s reaction, Trump said “These are legitimate people. They’re not in the world of “con” and the world of “obstruct” and the world of “resist.”” 

You know, I said something this morning – he has a chance to be one of the greatest justices ever in the United States Supreme Court. What a shame. And what a shame it is for so many other people whose world that isn’t. That’s not his world, and it’s not their world. These are legitimate people. They’re not in the world of “con” and the world of “obstruct” and the world of “resist.” 

He never thought this was even a possibility. He’s startled. He can’t believe this is happening. His wife is devastated. His children are devastated. I don’t mean they’re like “oh gee, I’m a little unhappy.” They’re devastated. 

Trump then pivoted to the Democrats behind the anti-Kavanaugh push, singling out Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer (NY) in particular for one of his famous impressions:

And it’s because these Democrats and they know, they know. When I see Schumer who never even saw this woman “I believe her 100 percent” and I see these other Senators that I deal with on a daily basis. I know them better than they know themselves. It’s just a game to them. But it’s a very dangerous game for our country

Watch: 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Q6SHov Tyler Durden