Too soon?
via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1sogAd9 Tyler Durden
another site
I’ll be on Red Eye
with Greg Gutfeld tonight (though Andy Levy will be guest hosting
for Greg).
Other guests include attorney Remy Spencer and comic Tom
Cotter.
The fun begins on Fox News at 3 A.M. ET. More info here.
from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1yiDntq
via IFTTT
Two weeks ago, we revealed one part of the “Secret Deal” between the US and Saudi Arabia: namely what the US ‘brought to the table’ as part of its grand alliance strategy in the middle east, which proudly revealed Saudi Arabia to be “aligned” with the US against ISIS, when in reality John Kerry was merely doing Saudi Arabia’s will when the WSJ reported that “the process gave the Saudis leverage to extract a fresh U.S. commitment to beef up training for rebels fighting Mr. Assad, whose demise the Saudis still see as a top priority.”
What was not clear is what was the other part: what did the Saudis bring to the table, or said otherwise, how exactly it was that Saudi Arabia would compensate the US for bombing the Assad infrastructure until the hated Syrian leader was toppled, creating a power vacuum in his wake that would allow Syria, Qatar, Jordan and/or Turkey to divide the spoils of war as they saw fit.
A glimpse of the answer was provided earlier in the article “The Oil Weapon: A New Way To Wage War“, because at the end of the day it is always about oil, and leverage.
The full answer comes courtesy of Anadolu Agency, which explains not only the big picture involving Saudi Arabia and its biggest asset, oil, but also the latest fracturing of OPEC at the behest of Saudi Arabia…
… which however is merely using “the oil weapon” to target the old slash new Cold War foe #1: Vladimir Putin.
To wit:
Saudi Arabia to pressure Russia, Iran with price of oil
Saudi Arabia will force the price of oil down, in an effort to put political pressure on Iran and Russia, according to the President of Saudi Arabia Oil Policies and Strategic Expectations Center.
Saudi Arabia plans to sell oil cheap for political reasons, one analyst says.
To pressure Iran to limit its nuclear program, and to change Russia’s position on Syria, Riyadh will sell oil below the average spot price at $50 to $60 per barrel in the Asian markets and North America, says Rashid Abanmy, President of the Riyadh-based Saudi Arabia Oil Policies and Strategic Expectations Center. The marked decrease in the price of oil in the last three months, to $92 from $115 per barrel, was caused by Saudi Arabia, according to Abanmy.
With oil demand declining, the ostensible reason for the price drop is to attract new clients, Abanmy said, but the real reason is political. Saudi Arabia wants to get Iran to limit its nuclear energy expansion, and to make Russia change its position of support for the Assad Regime in Syria. Both countries depend heavily on petroleum exports for revenue, and a lower oil price means less money coming in, Abanmy pointed out. The Gulf states will be less affected by the price drop, he added.
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, which is the technical arbiter of the price of oil for Saudi Arabia and the 11 other countries that make up the group, won’t be able to affect Saudi Arabia’s decision, Abanmy maintained.
The organization’s decisions are only recommendations and are not binding for the member oil producing countries, he explained.
Today’s Brent closing price: $90. Russia’s oil price budget for the period 2015-2017? $100. Which means much more “forced Brent liquidation” is in the cards in the coming weeks as America’s suddenly once again very strategic ally, Saudi Arabia, does everything in its power to break Putin.
via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1tLZphe Tyler Durden
We have documented the history if individual metals before and we have also visualized their annual production. However, we have not seen all of the metals on one timeline before such as in this infographic.
Worth noting is gold’s prominence ever since the beginning of history. Because the yellow metal is one of the rare elements that can be found in native form (such as nuggets), it was used by the earliest of our ancestors.
Comparatively, it is only recently that the technology has advanced to allow us to discover or extract the rest of the metals on today’s periodic table. For example, even though we knew of titanium as early as 1791, it was relatively useless all the way up until the 1940?s because of its metallurgy. In the 20th century, scientists advanced a way to remove the impurities, making it possible to get the strong and hard titanium we know today.
Another standout fact is that it took all the way until the early 19th century for two very important elements to be discovered. Both are not found free in nature very often and thus slipped detection for many centuries. Silicon, which actually makes up 26% of the earth’s crust, was discovered in 1823. Then in 1827, aluminum was discovered – we now know today that it is the most common metal in the earth’s crust (it’s actually 1200X more abundant than copper).
via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1xzQPWH Tyler Durden
Friday is theme-show night for The
Independents (Fox Business Network, 9 p.m. ET, 6 p.m. PT,
with re-airs three and five hours later), so tonight’s is on the
target-rich subject of “Governmental Breakdown.” It’s one of the
best shows we’ve ever produced, so you should watch it, probably on
your television.
The
program kicks off with Glenn “Instapundit” Reynolds explaining what
the Centers for Disease Control’s
mission creep can tell us not just about the Ebola response,
but to the nature of government in general, from 9/11 to the Secret
Service and beyond. “CIA
SpyGirl” Emily
Brandwin talks about the perils of having a Cold War-era spy
agency drag itself into the asymmetrical 21st century. Former GOP
congressman and longshot presidential candidate Thaddeus McCotter breaks
down how the governing breakdown in Congress is worrisome even for
those of us who don’t want the bastidges to get things
done.
There have been few governmental foul-ups in this dreary young
century more infuriatingly inept than those in the aftermath of
Hurricane Katrina. So yes, we have former Federal Emergency
Management Agency head Michael Brown on to talk about how FEMA went
bad, what it’s like being the scapegoat, and whether the original
sin in disaster-relief is federalizing the stuff in the first
place.
Reason
readers (and
viewers) know all about O.G. NSA whistleblower William Binney;
Fox Business Network viewers will also get a taste of the man who
was punished for warning his superiors that the agency was
shredding the Constitution. Speaking of punished whistleblowers,
have you heard of the V.A.’s
Scott Davis? Well, you will tonight, including detail of how
the White House itself allegedly intervened to punish bad news at
the source. And we all know the Post Office sucks, but what happens
when you try to compete with the monopoly? Outbox
co-founder Evan Baehr will explain how a great idea
got snuffed.
This is such a good show, it hurts my feelings. I dare you not
only to watch it, but encourage your frenemies to do the same. It
really is that swell.
Follow The Independents on Facebook at http://ift.tt/QYHXdB,
follow on Twitter @ independentsFBN, and
click on this page
for more video of past segments.
from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1suYsxp
via IFTTT
Despite the reassuring narrative from The West that Russia faces “costs” and is increasingly “isolated” due to sanctions for its actions in Ukraine, the most recent data suggests reality is quite different. First, capital outflows slowed dramatically in Q3 (from $23.7 billion in Q2 to $13 billion in Q3) with September seeing capital inflows for the first time since Sept 2013. Second, Russia’s current account surplus was significantly stronger than expected ($11.4 billion vs $8.8 billion expected) driven by increased trade. Third, and perhaps most crucially, Russia paid down a massive $52.8 billion in foreign debt as Putin “de-dollarizes” at near record pace, reducing external debt to the lowest since 2012.
As Goldman explains, Trade and income improved notably…
The current account balance for Q3 came in at a surplus of US$11.4bn, above consensus expectations of US$8.8bn and up sharply from a small deficit of US$0.7bn in Q3 2013.
On our estimates, on a seasonally-adjusted basis, this now puts the current account at 3.8% of GDP, up from a low point of 1% in Q2 2013 and 1.6% for the full-year 2013.
The improvement in the current account came from both the trade balance, where imports have contracted (due to slowing domestic demand and the weaker Ruble), and from the income balance.
In our view, the latter could be due to either cyclical or structural factors, which are difficult for us to pinpoint, but risks to our current account balance forecasts nonetheless remain to the upside.
Meanwhile,
Net private capital outflows stood at US$13bn for the quarter, up slightly from US$10bn in Q3 2013 and similar to the pattern seen in Q2.
*RUSSIA 3Q CAPITAL OUTFLOWS SLOW TO $13B VS $23.7B OUTFLOW IN 2Q
*RUSSIA HAD $11.6B NET CAPITAL INFLOW IN JUNE: CENTRAL BANK
June was first monthly net inflow since Sept. 2013, according to central bank statement.
And finally – “de-dollarization” accelerates as Russia pays down its foreign debt at the fastest pace since Lehman…
* * *
“Isolated” Indeed!
via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1smixFR Tyler Durden
Ebola is upon us and Republicans have a cure: A travel ban. Many
have them been vying with each other to shame the administration
into imposing one. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R), who is clearly
positioning himself for a possible 2016 presidential run,
issued a press release noting that the ban would “seem to be an
obvious step to protect public health in the United States.” Donald
Trump, who is threatening the country with another presidential
run,
tweeted that the president was being either “arrogant or
stupid” in resisting it.
And then there is the master of understatement, Rush Limbaugh,
who
alleged that the main reason why the administration was
rebuffing the ban was “political correctness.
Government exists to protect the life and property of its
citizens. So there might be an argument for a travel ban if it
actually worked and could be enforced without giving up on every
civilized value.
But there isn’t. A ban is unnecessary and would be quite likely
counterproductive, I note in The Week today:
Unnecessary because there is already a de facto private ban in
place, given that U.S.-based airlines
stopped flying to Ebola-afflicted countries two months ago (to
protect their crew and passengers from exposure — and themselves
from lawsuits). And counterproductive for a whole host of
reasons.
To see those reasons go
here.
from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1yXdZdN
via IFTTT
While 72 percent of Americans have a favorable view of the
police, 47 percent think the number of cases of police officers
using excessive force against civilians is on the rise, according
to the latest
Reason-Rupe poll. Forty-three percent say the rate of police
misconduct is steady and 7 percent think it’s on the decline.
When it comes to the use of lethal force, only 49 percent of
Americans are confident the police only use it when necessary.
Another 45 percent believe the police are too quick to pull the
trigger. Some may find it quite troubling that on such an important
issue, only half are confident in police officers’ decisions.
There are significant differences in perception across race and
ethnicity, as well as income and age. Younger, lower-income, and
nonwhite Americans are considerably more likely than older,
high-income, and white Americans to perceive injustice in the
police force.
Nevertheless, majorities across all remain favorable toward
their local law enforcement. However, African-American and Hispanic
Americans are more likely than Caucasians to believe police abuse
their authority and use force excessively. For instance, only 38
percent of white Americans believe excessive force in police
departments is increasing, compared to 73 percent of
African-Americans and 67 percent among Hispanics. Only 34 percent
of Caucasians believe the police use lethal force unnecessarily,
compared to 82 percent of African-Americans and 72 percent of
Hispanics.
Differences in income cannot explain these race/ethnic
disparities. Majorities of both lower and higher income nonwhite
Americans say police abuse is on the rise and are just as likely to
believe the police often use lethal force unnecessarily. However,
lower income white Americans are more likely than middle class and
higher income white Americans to perceive abuse of authority.
There are also regional differences in perception of police
abuse. Fifty-four percent of those in urban areas say the police
are too quick to use lethal force, compared to 35 percent of those
in rural areas. Southerners are also more likely to say abuse is on
the rise—52%—compared to only 38 percent of those in the
Midwest.
Republicans don’t think excessive force is increasing: 54
percent say it hasn’t changed much, and fully 70 percent say the
police only use lethal force when necessary. Democrats see things
differently; 57 percent say cases of excessive force is on the rise
and 61 percent say the police are too quick to use lethal force.
Independents agree with Democrats’ perception that cases of
excessive force are on the rise—52 percent. However, 50 percent
believe the police only use lethal force when necessary while 40
percent think the police are too quick to use it.
Perhaps ironically, Americans who prefer larger government are
the most likely—58 percent—to believe excessive force by the police
is on the rise and they are too quick to use lethal force. In
contrast, 52 percent of Americans who prefer limited government
think cases of police misconduct remain steady and 62 percent
believe police only use lethal force when necessary. Many Americans
do not see a connection between the size of government and its
impact on policing power.
The Reason-Rupe national telephone poll, executed
by Princeton Survey Research Associates International,
conducted live interviews with 1004 adults on cell phones (503) and
landlines (501) October 1-6, 2014. The poll’s margin of error
is +/-3.8%. Full poll results can be found here. including
poll toplines (pdf)
and crosstabs (xls).
from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1q9uVVe
via IFTTT
The S&P is 5.5% off its all-time record (triple the 666 lows) highs (and still positive year-to-date) and this happened…
What happens when it goes negative?
via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1suJgjV Tyler Durden
By EconMatters
3-5 Months Ahead of Fed Forecasts for Employment Levels
What has sort of gone under the radar recently with Ebola fear mongering, Europe throwing a tizzy fit until they get their ‘stimulus fix’ and everything is miraculously all well again, profit taking in front of earning`s season here in the US, and oil on one of its customary $20 trading range moves to the downside is that last Friday the unemployment rate dropped to 5.9% due to another robust employment report and several upward revisions to prior month`s reports. Yes we are in the 5`s for unemployment, well ahead of everyone`s forecasts including the Federal Reserve.
Fed Minutes after Incorrect Employment Report
It is great that everyone interpreted that the Fed Minutes were dovish, but the mistake is that this was after a dismal employment report, these minutes were based on old and incorrect economic information, and a Data Dependent Fed has some explaining to do now that the new employment data has come out last week for the economy.
But What About…
I know this is where the doom and gloom crowd who look at every glass as half full will point to the number of people who have left the workforce, or the under-utilization rate, or the quality of jobs created in the economy, or wages only being up 2% this year, or these jobs aren`t cosmic fulfilling to their ethos spirit.
Have You Seen The Jolts Chart?
My response to that criticism is the following data set from JOLTS data released this week showing there were 4.835 million job openings out there for all those who have either not been looking very hard for a job, have left the workforce, are not satisfied with their current job, or are seeking additional training to move into the workforce. This was the highest level of job openings since January 2001. The number of job openings increased for total private and was little changed for government in August. This is good for the economy the strength that we have seen in both the Employment numbers and JOLTS data the fact that the private sector is leading the way, and not burdensome non-market related government jobs which frankly act as a negative in my book considering their performance and compensation disconnect.
Read More >>> The Fed Can`t Raise Rates Because the Sky Is Blue
The Federal Reserve is Clueless
Thus this country has both created the most jobs this year since 1997, and has the most jobs still available since 2001, the unemployment rate is 5.9%, and by my standards full employment is the 5.5% level given historical standards in a normal, healthy economy and job market. Go back and look where the Fed Funds Rate was during times of comparable employment percentages for the last 20 years, throw in the fact the gas prices are finally coming down giving consumers extra money to spend on retail and discretionary spending during the Holiday shopping season, thus giving a boost to third and fourth quarter GDP numbers, the US economy is growing above trend, and there is no way in hell the Fed should still be stuck at recession era level of interest rates.
Read More >>> Is Janet Yellen Smarter Than Me?
What Comes After a Tightening Labor Market?
The amount of off-sides in the bond markets here taking advantage of ZIRP to borrow at essentially nothing and juice up bonds because when it costs nothing to borrow money any yield is a good yield in their book is setting the entire financial market up for major volatility in the massive getting back on-sides with the reality of a healthy economy growing above 2.5%.
I am sorry for the doom and gloom dovish free money for life crowd but use a little logic, the job market is tightening by any standards, we are growing above trend, and we are approaching by historical standards full levels of employment, what is the next shoe to drop in a tightening labor market reaching full employment, it is wage inflation and pricing power for goods and services other than petroleum products which have been overvalued for a long time given the fundamentals of the energy market. Make no mistake don`t be fooled by lower energy prices and its effects on inflation, giving a huge tax break to US consumers is actually after a slight lag effect, highly inflationary for overall prices in other categories of the CPI bucket, we are going to experience a sharp increase in inflation once these minimum wage initiatives start pushing through the system.
Read More >>> The Counterfactual Case Against ZIRP
Fed Dovishness Out of Control
I have never seen a more mismanaged Fed right now, Janet Yellen and the Doves snuggling up to her good graces are completely out of touch with the economic data and realities of the US economy. Furthermore, the latest ploy for those on Wall Street who want continued free money at any costs to long-term financial stability to the system are the same crowd that was buying subprime mortgages the last time interest rates were low chasing the same type of levered yield trades that time with securitized debt instruments, and this time with treasuries around the world. The can`t raise interest rates mentality because the dollar is too strong are myopic ZIRP sycophants, this is what happens when an economy is growing better than other economies, the currency appreciates against other currencies, and interest rates rise. Do any of these people have a basic understanding of economic, business and financial market theory?
Read More >>> Janet Yellen Is The Wrong Chairperson For the Fed
Liberalism at core of Fed Cluelessness
This is how economics work, this is a good thing to have one`s economy outperforming its peers on a globally competitive basis, to be entrepreneurial, create innovative products, better ways of doing things, paying higher wages because employment levels are rising, the job market is tightening, and by any normal measure interest rates should be following suit and rising as well regardless of whether the US Dollar also strengthens. This isn`t a new concept, the US Dollar has been strong before, and the Fed Funds Rate has been much higher. I swear these doves at the Fed are from this West Coast school of ‘Feel Good Liberalism’ at the expense of throwing all their economic principles out the window. These doves at the Federal Reserve are so left wing ideologues that they are basically risking the entire financial system, creating massive bubbles in most of all the bond markets that are going to end disastrously at this pace, all because of their social welfare mentality which is at the core of all of this ZIRP Nonsense.
But Look We Are Helping People Mentality
I finally figured out what is part of the core reason shaping this out of touch view by what are supposed to be trained economists, it all starts from academia, which is as politically correct and socialist liberal leaning as you can get stuck in the easy confines of protected walls of ‘Feelgoodism’. These people feel good about themselves if they are in their mind playing a role in giving something away, they are participating in the cause, even if it means being totally disconnected from economic reality and basic historical economic relationships that have held for decades, all along the way creating massive bubbles in financial markets that create more damage to the system over the long-term. It is the fact that in their minds they are ‘helping people’ by keeping interest rates below healthy levels, and the big banks are more than willing to accept the free money, they sure the hell don`t give a damn about the long-term. The big banks and financial institutions will never say NO to free capital.
The Federal Reserve Should Not Be a ZIRP Soup Kitchen for Financial Markets
Consequently Social Liberalism is really what has corrupted this Federal Reserve, and no I am not a conservative, in fact I have no political affiliation, other than maybe a person interested in price discovery and the beauty of free markets without Fed controlled manipulation of asset prices. But if these folks are going to let their politics interfere with basic economic reasoning and theory, then we need to start treating them like politicians and voting them in or out of office every two years.
And I would clean house with this Federal Reserve, they are incompetent, irresponsible risk takers with Monetary Policy, and with a 5.9% unemployment rate and a 25 basis point Fed Funds Rate, motivated by their ‘Feel Good Do Goodism’ liberal bearings have lost all objective economic reality! These people should have become social workers instead of objective ‘data dependent’ economists. The financial system doesn`t need any more ZIRP handouts to ‘fix’ things, or break things so that they can be ‘fixed’ again, what they need is for the Federal Reserve to get out of financial markets, return interest rates to more normalized conditions, and stay out of financial markets for good in terms of asset purchases. Enough of this Social Welfare Mentality for Financial Markets!
© EconMatters All Rights Reserved | Facebook | Twitter | Email Subscribe | Kindle
via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1sm6Te5 EconMatters