Tag: news

Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith of OfTwoMinds blog,

Whether this trend will hold or reverse is unknown, but it does suggest that there are advantages to being the cleanest shirt in the dirty laundry.

Dave at Trade with Dave recently posed an interesting question: Is A Stronger Dollar Stealth QE? The question might seem wonky, but it's actually a nuts-and-bolts topic in the context of a larger question: why is the U.S. economy now the shining beacon of growth (albeit modest) in a world rolling over into recession?

 

Whether this trend will hold or reverse is unknown, but it does suggest that there are advantages to being the cleanest shirt in the dirty laundry (insert your metaphor of choice).

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1vWPSbC Tyler Durden

This week has seen some market volatility (see VIX Chart) reminiscent of the functioning market from days of old. The markets are spooked, bad news is overtaking good news and bearish views are becoming vogue. We are seeing a titanic battle taking place between the various bull and bear camps and they are starting to unleash some serious firepower. 

The sleepy volumes of late have ticked up appreciably, and small investors are shifting in their seats nervously. The secret that no one really wants to admit (especially while they are making money) is that the recent stock market rally is a gargantous fraud. It has very shaky foundations indeed, propped up on pillars of monetary jelly. At its core is a massive money creation machine which is utterly unaccountable and unelected and a very select credit distribution system. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Market Volatility Index – 1989 to October 9, 2014 (Thomson Reuters)

You have heard the arguments regarding growing mountains of debt, the risk of inflation and stagflation, overvalued stock markets, property markets, massive derivative positions etc etc etc. 

Perhaps you have become a little desensitized to these risks, because the party still seems to be going on, and no one is panicking. Yes we have had a few bumps in the economic road to date but they have been explained away. But far more has happened on your watch then you may be aware and it might all becoming to a head very, very shortly. 

What has happened is that the entire capital market complex has become “managed” and captured by a few very powerful institutions. What this means is that we have moved from a market based global economy – which matches buyer against seller in an efficient price discovery mechanism, to a planned global economy, where intervention is the norm and the views of those in leveraged command matter more.

The markets are, and have been for the past 10 to 15 years, transfixed on the policy decisions of the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank, and all other global central banks are transfixed on the policy decisions of the Federal Reserve too. The power that this one institution has been given is staggering. They can, without any recourse, to elected officials, initiate policy that can send the global economy into a tailspin. Their policies can push millions if not billions of Emerging Economy citizens into destitution  or transform them from impoverished to empowered. 

The market gyrations we are seeing this week are multi-faceted. At their heart is a game of chicken between what the markets say they need and what the Federal Reserve is willing to give them. It all comes down to the terms by which credit is released and managed and how productive those in receipt of money can be with the credit. 

There is also another battle being waged, those that wish to print money to stimulate and those that wish to manage government expenditures in order to balance the fiscal books. The market assumptions regarding Germany and its economy are being found to be false, the growth assumptions for the global economy are being found to be false, these false assumptions are now being priced into expected returns, and as such current valuations are being seen as being shaky.

Many commentators believe that the central banks and regulators have become captive to political and specific industry interests, we would agree. What is even more troubling is the degree to which the markets themselves have become centralised in their outlook. For example, in the last number of years an enormous amount of the world’s capital market asset basis is increasingly be managed by ONE single company and or directed by the services provided by Blackrock’s “Alladin” system. Indeed The Economist magazine believes that “Alladin” monitors and supports upwards of 30,000 investment portfolios and assists in the direction of over 17 Trillion dollars in assets.  That is 7% of the worlds total. This is sheer lunacy.

What if the Federal Reserve makes a bad call, what if the Alladin misses it, what then?

Too much power vested in two few is a recipe for disaster. Truly we have put a fox in charge of our hen house.

Gold has started to grab attention as concerned money seeks a safe haven.  Interestingly over the last 10 years gold has risen in most currencies and far outperformed the equity markets. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See GoldCore’s ‘Gold Important Diversification As Living In One Greatest Financial Bubbles Ever’ Webinar Here

RECEIVE BREAKING NEWS AND UPDATES HERE

9TH OF OCTOBER – THOMSON REUTERS INTERVIEW GOLDCORE’S MARK O’BYRNE FOR THOMSON REUTERS GLOBAL GOLD FORUM

Jan Harvey  thomsonreuters.com  I’m joined in the Forum now by Mark O’Byrne, research director at GoldCore, who’s agreed to talk us through his view of the market. Welcome, Mark! 
Mark O’Byrne  goldcore.com  Thanks Jan. Thanks for having me on ! 

Jan Harvey  thomsonreuters.com  Glad to have you. So — gold’s had a bit of a rollercoaster time of it recently, with prices falling back below $1,200/oz earlier this week. What sort of reaction did you see to that decline from consumers? 
Mark O’Byrne  goldcore.com  We saw a tentative increase in demand from existing clients but retail investors remain out of the gold market with sentiment as bad as we have seen it for many years. 

Jan Harvey  thomsonreuters.com  Are potential buyers still attracted to gold at lower price levels? Or are there some concerns that it could have further to fall? 

Mark O’Byrne  goldcore.com  So repeat business is key with clients either reallocating to gold if they previously had liquidated – we advised caution when gold prices surged over $1600 back in 2011 – or clients increasing allocations due to concerns about various risks. Some good HNW and family office business too and a desire for storage in Singapore and Zurich. 

Mark O’Byrne  goldcore.com  Bit of both really. Think majority concerned about further falls but quite a large percentage of our clients see the price weakness as a buying opportunity. Think retail investors as a whole would be very concerned of further price falls as there is still a lot of risk appetite in the world and investors are favouring stocks and property over gold … for now 

Jan Harvey  thomsonreuters.com  What do you think we would need to see before we saw a stronger return to buying among retail investors? 

Mark O’Byrne  goldcore.com  I believe we need a period of rising gold prices and retail investors tend to be trend followers. We also probably need heightened concern about markets and about the financial system and global economy. A resumption of the Eurozone debt crisis, a U.S. recession, a global recession and major War in the Middle East and other risks of today… 

Mark O’Byrne  goldcore.com  have the potential to lead to a period of risk aversion which may see stocks, bonds and property come under pressure. This would greatly benefit gold and should see higher prices and retail investors allocate to gold again. Unfortunately for investors they tend to forget the most important rule in investing which is … 

Mark O’Byrne  goldcore.com  … DIVERSIFICATION. Irrational exuberance and complacency is rife again today — but for how long and how sustainable – are important questions 

Mark O’Byrne  goldcore.com  We advise dollar, pound or euro cost averaging into gold. This protects from volatility and short term price risk. 

Jan Harvey  thomsonreuters.com  Has there been a change in the kind of volumes, or products, favoured by retail investors this year over last? 

Mark O’Byrne  goldcore.com  Not for us. We tend to deal with investors who wish to accumulate physical gold in the cheapest ways possible. Therefore, we always offer cost effective bullion formats. If we are offering American eagles at very low premiums they will buy them, if we have Gold bars (1 oz) they will go for them. 

Mark O’Byrne   goldcore.com  We are offering kilo bars in volume at near 1% premiums currently, if the client buys a minumim of 4 kilo bars for storage in London, Zurich, Singapore or Hong Kong. Because we are so competitive on the premium, we are attracting some flows from the gold ETFs and some flows from banks unallocated gold accounts. 

Jan Harvey  thomsonreuters.com  What has interest been like in silver, compared to gold? 

Mark O’Byrne  goldcore.com  Thus, much of our business is not new gold buyers but rather from existing gold buyers who are looking to own segreated and allocated coins and bars 

Mark O’Byrne  goldcore.com  Quite similar. Although there is the silver stacker phenomenon of those who believe silver will either outperform gold or will be a better protection from a systemic or currency collapse or both … 

Mark O’Byrne  goldcore.com  … they buy silver consistently whenever they have disposable income and have been a constant for years. Their demand can be seen in the data as well. The VAT on silver in the UK and Europe can lead to less demand for silver for delivery but for our Secure Storage we see similar demand for silver as we see for gold – everything from 1,000 oz bars to silver eagles and maples and a combination thereof 

Jan Harvey  thomsonreuters.com  Do you think demand for silver has been affected by the hefty price swings of recent years (which have been even more pronounced for silver than for gold)? 

Mark O’Byrne   goldcore.com  Silver looks unvervalued when compared to stocks and many assets today and there is some merit to their line of thought 

Mark O’Byrne   goldcore.com  Yes the volatility has put off most of the retail investment marketplace. This means that silver remains the preserve of a minority of hard money types and those who are concerned about the financial and monetary system … 

Mark O’Byrne   goldcore.com  Although silver has been volatile – it is important to put that volatility into context. Silver is less volatile than many “blue chip” shares and many of the tech share darlings of today. Yet you rarely hear experts caution people from buying individual shares … 

Mark O’Byrne   goldcore.com  It is interesting there is a cross over of bitcoin advocates and early adopters and both share similar concerns about the monetary system … 

Mark O’Byrne  goldcore.com  Our positon on silver is similar to that on gold. It has a place in a diversifed portfolio. Somewhere between 5% to 10% for gold and 5% to 10% for silver. This means that an investor would have some 10% to 20% in precious metals … 

Mark O’Byrne  goldcore.com  This would be considered high but we believe that the financial, economic, monetary and indeed geopolitical backdrop merits higher allocations to precious metals today – especially due to their undervaluation versus stocks, bonds and property – all of which are at record highs. 

Jan Harvey  thomsonreuters.com  Thanks Mark. And thanks for joining us today! 
Mark Obyrne  goldcore.com  Pleasure Jan. Sorry for the dreaded blue boxes !  and thanks again for having me on 

GOLDCORE MARKET UPDATE
Today’s AM fix was USD 1,222.25, EUR 964.38 and GBP 761.01 per ounce.
Yesterday’s AM fix was USD 1,227.50, EUR 961.99 and GBP 757.67 per ounce.
        
Gold climbed $1.20 or 0.1% to $1,223.70 per ounce and silver fell $0.05 or 0.29% to $17.35 per ounce yesterday. 

Gold in Singapore remained firm at $1,224.06 an ounce by 0035 GMT, after climbing for four straight sessions. 
The yellow metal is up 2.8% for the week, its best since the third week of June, after bouncing back from a 15-month-low hit earlier this week.
Other precious metals, silver, platinum and palladium all look set to end their five weeks of losses. 

Gold’s safe haven status has been ignited on poor economic news from the eurozone’s biggest economy, Germany, a weaker dollar, and IMF’s weaker growth expectations for Japan and Brazil.

In London, gold pulled back on Friday, ending four days of gains as the dollar climbed against a basket of currencies.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1waKPSP GoldCore

A year after the Fed injected $1 trillion into the stock market, the US economy was supposed to show stable, benign inflation north of 2%, validating stable, benign “growth” and pushing yields well into the mid-3% range. It failed to do that, stumping many a Keynesian hack who can’t explain how it is possible that inflation (at least the variety measured by the BLS, not the real type, like food, energy, tuition costs, and healthcare which is considered largely irrelevant) has so far failed to spring up.

For all those hacks, here is the answer in one simple chart.

Still confused?

The reason why the BLS’ seasonally and hedonically-adjusted core inflation has failed to rise is because Japan, courtesy of its far greater on a relative basis QE and its crashing Yen, has been exporting deflation to the US hand over fist, and as the import price index released moments ago confirmed, imported deflation courtesy of Japan, whose index just dropped to 98.5 pushing overall import prices lower by -0.5%, is the biggest since mid-2010.

And since its is an interconnected, fungible world, one can either have a soaring Nikkei (in Yen terms if flat in USD) and plunging Yen, leading to ridiculous Japanese inflation imports (just ask the locals in Tokyo how much of their wages they spend on food, energy and anything that is imported these days) and a near-record Japanese misery index, or one can have the much desired US inflation, one can’t have both.

Which, poetically, also means that when it comes to global growth, Fedonomics and Abenomics mutually offset each other.

Source: BLS

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1waKPlR Tyler Durden

Two months ago, US and European equity markets exploded higher after RIA tweeted that Russia sought a de-escalation in Ukraine. Today, after an ugly week of higher volatility and even higher anxiety, RIA is at it again, tweeting the following – Kiev agrees to withdraw troops from several Eastern Ukraine cities – DPR leader Zakharchenko – and stocks have started to ramp…

 

BREAKING: Kiev agrees to withdraw troops from several Eastern Ukraine cities – DPR leader Zakharchenko http://ift.tt/1rl1f6V

— RIA Novosti (@ria_novosti) October 10, 2014

 

BREAKING: Donetsk People’s Republic signs demarcation line deal with Kiev http://ift.tt/1smalqu

— RIA Novosti (@ria_novosti) October 10, 2014

And the response…

 

This is what happened last time…

 

Charts: Bloomberg

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1ECYJDp Tyler Durden

Despite claims of containment, Reuters reports seven more people turned themselves in late on Thursday to an Ebola isolation unit in Madrid; but following a visit by PM Rajoy, Spanish citizens can relax as the government is setting up a special Ebola committee. Following yesterday's scare in Paris, The Independent reports authorities are investigating a 'probable' case of a French national who may have contracted the disease in Africa. The World Health organization has warned that East Asia is at risk of becoming a "hot spot" for diseases – but is well prepared after SARS and avian flu but it is the appearance of a confirmed case in Brazil that is most concerning. A 47-year-old man, originally from Guinea, is LatAm's first case and suggests SOUTHCOM's "nightmare scenario" is closer than many would care to believe. Finally, the CDC has issued special guidance to 911 operators on dealing with suspected Ebola cases across America.

 

Spain continues to escalate (as Reuters reports)

Seven people turned themselves in late on Thursday to an Ebola isolation unit in Madrid where Teresa Romero, the nurse who became the first person to contract Ebola outside Africa, lay gravely ill.

 

…

 

In Spain, recriminations mounted over Romero, who was infected in hospital as she treated two Spanish missionaries who had caught the hemorrhagic fever in West Africa — where Ebola has already killed around 4,000 people — and remained undiagnozed for days despite reporting her symptoms.

 

The seven new admissions included two hairdressers who had given Romero a beauty treatment before she was diagnosed with Ebola, and hospital staff who had treated the 44-year-old nurse. The Carlos III hospital said they had all turned themselves in voluntarily to be monitored for signs of the disease.

 

A hospital spokeswoman said there were now 14 people in the isolation unit on its sealed-off sixth floor, including Romero, her husband, and health workers who had cared for Romero since she was admitted on Monday.

But have no fear…

• *SPAIN IS PREPARED TO DEAL WITH EBOLA, SAENZ DE SANTAMARIA SAYS
• *SPAIN SETS UP SPECIAL EBOLA COMMITTEE, DEPUTY PM SAYS
• *DEPUTY PM SAENZ SAYS SHE WILL CHAIR SPAIN EBOLA COMMITTEE
• *SPAIN TO CREATE EBOLA CRISIS TEAM, PM RAJOY SAYS
• *POSSIBILITY OF WIDER EBOLA CONTAGION VERY LOW, RAJOY SAYS

Following yesterday's false alarm, The Independent reports that France appears to have its first case…

Authorities in Paris are investigating a “probable” case of Ebola in a hospital, according to local reports.

 

Doctors are expected to receive results from medical tests on a woman who may have contracted the virus and is currently being treated in hospital on Friday, Europe 1 has reported.

 

They fear the woman may have contracted the virus in Africa. She is understood not to be a French national.

Brazil becomes the first South American country with a confirmed Ebola infection (as The Independent reports)

Brazil is treating a 47-year-old man who has become the country’s first suspected case of the deadly Ebola virus.

 

The man, originally from Guinea in West Africa, has been placed into isolation at a hospital in the city of Cascavel, where Brazil’s ministry of health have sent specialists to provide additional help and care.

 

He arrived in Brazil on 19 September and is believed to have travelled from Guinea.

 

On Thursday afternoon the man went to the emergency department at the hospital with a fever. His case is being treated by medics as suspicious as his symptoms have developed within the maximum incubation period for Ebola, which is 21 days.

 

Brazil’s ministry of health has reminded people that Ebola is transmitted through the contact with the blood, tissues or bodily fluids of sick individuals, or through the contact of contaminated objects or surfaces.

Which is what SOUTHCOM commander General John Kelly said was his "nightmare scenario"

In the US, the CDC has issued guidance for 9-1-1 operators dealing with suspected Ebola infected patient calls…

Who this is for: Managers of 9-1-1 Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs), EMS Agencies, EMS systems, law enforcement agencies and fire service agencies as well as individual emergency medical services providers (including emergency medical technicians (EMTs), paramedics, and medical first responders, such as law enforcement and fire service personnel).

 

What this is for: Guidance for handling inquiries and responding to patients with suspected Ebola symptoms, and for keeping workers safe.

 

How to use: Managers should use this information to understand and explain to staff how to respond and stay safe. Individual providers can use this information to respond to suspected Ebola patients and to stay safe.

 

Key Points:

• The likelihood of contracting Ebola is extremely low unless a person has direct unprotected contact with the blood or body fluids (like urine, saliva, feces, vomit, sweat, and semen) of a person who is sick with Ebola or direct handling of bats or nonhuman primates from areas with Ebola outbreaks.
• When risk of Ebola is elevated in their community, it is important for PSAPs to question callers about:
  • Residence in, or travel to, a country where an Ebola outbreak is occurring;
  • Signs and symptoms of Ebola (such as fever, vomiting, diarrhea); and
  • Other risk factors, like having touched someone who is sick with Ebola.
• PSAPS should tell EMS personnel this information before they get to the location so they can put on the correct personal protective equipment (PPE).
• EMS staff should check for symptoms and risk factors for Ebola. Staff should notify the receiving healthcare facility in advance when they are bringing a patient with suspected Ebola, so that proper infection control precautions can be taken.

The guidance provided in this document is based on current knowledge of Ebola.

*  *  *

And finally, the World Health Organization is warning about risk in East Asia… (China Daily)

East Asia, with its trade and transport hubs and armies of migrant workers, is at risk from Ebola but is improving its defenses and may be more ready than other areas to respond if cases are diagnosed, World Health Organization officials said Friday.

 

Shin Young-soo, the WHO regional director for the Western Pacific, said East Asia has been a "hotspot" for emerging diseases in the past and has dealt with SARS and avian flu, so it is more prepared than other regions to respond after learning the importance of public education, strong surveillance and transparency.

 

"All these travel, economic trade, and we have global hubs like Singapore, Hong Kong, and the Philippines is sending a lot of work forces all over the world," make it a possibility for the virus to reach East Asia, Shin said.

*  *  *

It is not contained…

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1yW5kbH Tyler Durden

In another well-funded research study, the New York Fed has, via its Liberty Street Economics blog, unveiled its explanation for why volatility is low (obviously missing the Kevin Henry-Citadel dark-pool VIX-slamming machinations that are so evident on an almost daily basis). Their findings are a little awkward for The Fed… the current volatility environment appears substantially different from what happened prior to the financial crisis. However, the Fed's conclusion, as Helen Thomas notes, is worrisome – low interest rates tend to mute volatility (something we already knew) – but if that is the case (from their findings) then implicitly: If low volatility is caused by low rates which in turn cause low volatility, what happens when rates go up?

 

As Liberty Street Economics blog notes,

Volatility, a measure of how much financial markets are fluctuating, has been near its record low in many asset classes. Over the last few decades, there have been only two other periods of similarly low volatility: in May 2013, and prior to the financial crisis in 2007. Is there anything we can learn from the recent period of low volatility versus what occurred slightly more than one year ago and seven years ago? Probably; the current volatility environment appears quite similar to the one in May 2013, but it’s substantially different from what happened prior to the financial crisis.

 

 

 

Broadly, our results confirm what has been reported in the press—namely that reduced uncertainty regarding the policy outlook, proxied by the dispersion of the three-month Treasury-bill forecast, as well as low levels of financial stress, are contributing to the recent low levels of volatility. Also, low interest rates tend to mute volatility, with the ten-year Treasury yield low by historical standards. These three variables were similarly low last May, contributing to the interpretation that current underlying fundamentals resemble those from a year ago. When thinking about what was happening back in 2007, there are some substantial differences. Uncertainty regarding short-term policy was higher, with survey forecast dispersion for the three-month Treasury bill being substantially greater than it was today or last year. Financial stress, as represented by the TED spread (the difference between the interest rates on interbank loans and Treasury bills), and the ten-year Treasury note yield were also higher. In contrast, households seemed much more certain in their outlook, based on the dispersion of forecasts from household surveys. This measure was substantially lower prior to the financial crisis, but is currently near average, as it was last May.

 

 

During times of relative market calm, like today, it could be that low financial market volatility is pushing these fundamental drivers lower, rather than the other way around. This note does not specifically address whether volatility is affecting or is being affected by these drivers.

*  *  *

So, as Blonde Money blog adds,

Since the financial crisis, there has been a heightened awareness of how markets interact, and how a signal from one market can suggest that positions in another should be covered.

 

hen markets watch one another, this can cause volatility to propagate.

 

…

 

[The research above] says: Volatility is low because Treasury yields are low and not moving around very much. It’s very different to Lehman, when household confidence was in disarray, credit spreads were high and random news was flying around.

 

You may discount this as telling you what you already know. The authors themselves conclude:

 

"During times of relative market calm, like today, it could be that low financial market volatility is pushing these fundamental drivers lower, rather than the other way around."

 

But the ongoing conclusion from that is dynamite. If low volatility is caused by low rates which in turn cause low volatility, what happens when rates go up? Even worse, what are these alleged indicators of volatility telling us? Precisely nothing.

 

You can no longer place your portfolio in risky assets, sit back, and wait for an exogenous factor to tell you when to hedge. There are no exogenous factors. Volatility is eating itself, and when the market realises, we will be in for one hell of a panic.

*  *  *

But then the Fed probably knows that…

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1sm0FMF Tyler Durden