China Slams US Over Russian Sanctions; Warns “Will Escalate Tensions”

Having previously called Russia a “good neighbor, good partner, and good friend,” it seems increasingly clear that the West faces not just Russia but China too as it brings more sanctions to bear. As The BRICS Post reports, Beijing announced its support for a beleaguered Moscow, calling on all parties to resolve the crisis, and warning that they “believe that sanctions are inconducive to the solution of problems. On the contrary, they will escalate tensions.”

 

As The BRICS Post reports,

Beijing announced its support for a beleaguered Moscow after the US and Canada announced fresh sanctions against Russia for it’s alleged “inaction” in easing tensions in Ukraine.

 

In a public signal of increasing Sino-Russian cooperation, China called on all parties to resolve the Ukrainian crisis through dialogue rather than sanctions, Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said Monday.

 

“We believe that sanctions are inconducive to the solution of problems. On the contrary, they will escalate tensions,” he said.

 

It is not in line with any side’s interests to impose sanctions, he added. “We call on all parties concerned to continue dialogue and negotiations so to resolve the crisis in a political way.”

 

Qin told a daily press briefing that China has been in touch with all relevant nations, including G7 nations, since the Ukrainian crisis erupted, and made clear the nation’s stance on the issue.

Hardly reassuring for all those ‘believers’ that US businesses will remain unaffected as sanctions are ratcheted up

Beijing’s support for its ally comes ahead of a strategic visit by Russian President Vladimir Putin to Shanghai next month where he will hold talks with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1pKt5Pj Tyler Durden

Of Spilled Milk, Water over the Dam and Reality Intrusions

Of Spilled Milk, Water over the Dam and Reality Intrusions

By

Cognitive Dissonance

 

 

To subscribe to ‘Dispatches’, a periodic newsletter from Cognitive Dissonance and TwoIceFloes Creations, please click here.

 

When I am in the middle of a righteously indignant “I’ve been wronged” temper tantrum the last thing I want to hear is the phrase “There’s no sense crying over spilled milk”. Or that other classic, “It’s just water over the dam/under the bridge.” Hearing those while stamping my feet and blowing my top sure does ruin a good self indulgent rant.

Whilst in the midst of a particularly satisfying emotional rant the other day a twenty year old memory flashed in my mind that immediately took all the fun out of my naval gazing and promptly brought me back to Earth. The only thing worse than having a fresh dose of humility stuffed in your face is when you are doing your own stuffing. It really is a shame we cannot un-remember select items and must resort to denial to purge the mind of uncomfortable truths and other disturbing miscellanea.

I was four years into my new career as a ‘financial adviser’, more accurately described as a financial ‘products’ salesman. One of my clients, a husband and wife hovering around retirement age, had been with me from nearly the beginning and I knew them well. He had just recently retired since his company pension could not be increased by working additional years, and she was two years removed from her own work retirement. All she wanted to do was reach the ‘official’ company retirement age so she could take her full pension. While waiting out the clock she was putting nearly everything she earned into her company 401(k) as well as her own personal retirement investments.

The wife, let’s call her Anne, called me a few minutes after I walked into the office. She was extremely excited and agitated, and for the first minute or so I could not understand her at all. Once I was able to get her to slow down and fill in some background her excitement became quite understandable. It seemed she had won the lottery and wanted my advice before heading down to the headquarters to claim her one million dollar plus prize. 

Once I could get a word in edge wise I suggested she immediately come down to my office so we could talk about her options. I also suggested she engage a lawyer before claiming the prize because I was certain I was not the expert here in some of the legal matters she would eventually wish she had considered. Unfortunately she would have none of that and informed me that as soon as she hung up the phone she was headed to the lottery office with her husband Harold. All she wanted to know was if she should take the ‘lifetime’ twenty annual payments or the lump sum after taxes. I suggested the lump sum, knowing full well that the twenty ‘annuity’ payments were based upon a below market interest rate.

Just after lunch Anne (with Harold in tow) showed up at my office looking like she had been run over by a Mack truck. Distraught and anguished were not sufficient enough terms to describe her state of mind or physical demeanor. Within a minute of sitting at my desk she was in tears and sobbing, with poor Harold completely lost and unable to console his wife. I rushed to close my office door as her explanation spilled out.

 

Spilled Milk

 

In a nut shell she had not won a million dollars. There had been a mistake last night when the local TV outlet had broadcast the winning lottery numbers, the norm along with newspapers for dispersing lottery announcements before the Internet age had bloomed. One of the numbers displayed had been incorrect (though interestingly I found out later the voice over had given the correct number) which meant one of the numbers on her ticket was not a winning number. That was the ‘bad’ news. The ‘good’ news was that she had been the sole second place winner, the prize of which was a not so paltry one hundred thousand dollars after taxes in one lump sum.

However for Anne this was not good news at all. For sixteen short hours she had been a millionaire and had mentally spent all that money on retirement vacations, new automobiles, gifts for the children etc. As she handed over a check for a little more than one hundred thousand, to be deposited into her investment account, if you were watching her body language you would have thought she was handing Satan her engraved one way ticket to hell.

Long story short it was all downhill from there. While the lottery winnings enabled Anne to retire early rather than wait for her full pension payment (it was only a matter of 4% and she still received full health benefits) and as a bonus pay off the remaining balance on her mortgage, she rapidly slipped into despondency and despair. A few years later she and Harold divorced and she became somewhat of a recluse, drinking heavily and running through what remained of the divorce proceeds in a few short years. I lost touch with her shortly thereafter until I read her obit a few years further down the road. It was sad, so very sad indeed.

This was the memory that flashed across my mind while in the middle of my delicious rant. Talk about rant interruptus. The impression the memory cemented in my mind, both back then in real time and now upon reflection, was to always examine what is ‘real’ and what is not. While my anger or upset was most certainly ‘real’ it was not actually based upon anything real, but rather a sense of outrage that I had been harmed, either directly or indirectly just like Anne.

For those keeping score at home let us revisit what was ‘real’ with the situation Anne found herself in and how she reacted to her windfall. Anne never actually won the million dollars; it was never hers to begin with. It was her perception of a fictitious ‘reality’ that had defined her ‘belief’ that she had won. She never ‘realized’ the winning ticket, but she did possess the winning second place ticket.

What would have been her reaction if, instead of thinking she had won a million, she correctly understood she had ‘only’ won one hundred thousand? I suspect she would most likely have been ecstatic; possibly as excited as she was when she called me with the ‘news’ of winning one million.

In other words in her mind, and to a lesser extent in her husband’s, she made ‘real’ something that was not actually a fact or truth mostly because she ‘believed’ it to be real. And her belief was formed primarily because the information came from an authority….in this case the local television station. If her neighbor had told her she had won a million bucks I suspect she would have treated the news with a great deal more skepticism. Let the buyer of the belief beware.

 

Let the Belief Buyer Beware

 

Worse, because she had been emotionally and psychically imprinted in a significant manner with the false ‘news’ that she had won a million dollars, when her belief was proven wrong even the truth that she was in fact one hundred thousand dollars richer, was of little to no consolation. It cannot be overstated how deeply and completely Anne believed she was a millionaire and the degree of emotional trauma that was self inflicted when she discovered she was not.

I must warn the reader not to dismiss this story as immaterial to you or your loved ones because what happened to Anne happens to you and me on a daily basis, only for us the discovery and assimilation time frame is greatly stretched out compared to Anne’s sixteen hour trip from normalcy to millionaire to Satan’s hell. On a daily basis we emotionally deal with truths that are no longer true….or more accurately in many cases were never true to begin with. Slowly but surely ‘reality’ intrudes into our mind numbing denial, and soon enough another castle rampart falls to the inevitable decay of the truth invasion.

While Anne may be perceived as emotionally unstable and even intellectually dishonest, and there is no doubt that her inability to cope with the emotional letdown of reality intruding upon her believed fantasy certainly suggests deeper emotional issues, are we not all to some degree or another clinging to past ‘truths’ that never were and might never be?

Because I most certainly was clinging to mine when I exercised my freedom to act emotionally childish and wallow in my own self-indulgent rant. Just like Anne I believed something that was not actually true, though in my case it was more a conglomerate of conditioned concepts rather than just one simple belief. I was done wrong by a ‘system’ that promised truth and justice for all. Yet when the Calvary was supposed to gallop in and save the day none appeared, and I was indignant. How dare they forget about poor little me?

I suspect “We the People” will be suffering endless disappointment and emotional trauma as we descend the social and financial ladder to Satan’s place. And while this fall from grace might be stretched out over a period of ten, twenty, even thirty years, similar to the fall of the Soviet Union both before and after the actual dissolution of the Communist bloc, a decline they are only now beginning to recover from, a fall it most definitely will be.

The key here is not what you and I can do to stop the inevitable. The key is what are you and I doing to prepare emotionally, then physically and financially, to weather the storm already on the horizon. For me the self indulgent rants must stop as I turn my face towards reality and the gathering storm clouds.

 

04-29-2014

Cognitive Dissonance

www.TwoIceFloes.com is unlike anything you will find on the web, a truly unique destination. There you will find distinctive Premium Members only articles as well as discussions on wellness and health, homesteading, spirituality & philosophy, and most importantly ‘safe’ forums not found anywhere else. Come by for a peek and stay a while.

 

Water Over the Dam




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1mWoLrO Cognitive Dissonance

Does it Matter That British Teen Suspected of Stabbing Teacher to Death Played Violent Video Games?

The
Daily Mail
is reporting that the teenager in England who
is suspected of recently stabbing a teacher to death in front of
students played “ultra-violent video games,” “experimented with
drugs,” and threatened to commit suicide after he complained about
bullying. The Mail also mentions that the 15-year-old
boy’s peers regarded him as a loner who mostly did well in school
but “seemed increasingly troubled in recent months.” The Grand
Theft Auto
series and Dark Souls are all mentioned as
games played by the suspect in the Mail‘s reporting.

Most readers will remember that after the Sandy Hook Elementary
shooting in December 2012 it was reported that Adam Lanza enjoyed
violent video games such as those in the Call of Duty
series. In March 2013
The New York Times
reported that according to one
witness Lanza was a “shut-in and an avid gamer who plays ‘Call of
Duty,’ amongst other games.” According to The Daily Mail,
Lanza also played
Gears of War
.

However, while it might be the case that many of those who
commit violent crimes also played violent video games it is not
clear that there is a causal relationship between playing violent
video games and violent crime.

In the March 2014 issue of Reason
Jacob Sullum points out that Lanza played Dance Dance
Revolution
every Friday, Saturday, and Sunday in the months
before the Sandy Hook massacre. No one is suggesting that Lanza’s
obsession with dancing as being causally related to his murder of
27 people.

Reason‘s Jesse Walker notes in the June 2014 issue
of Reason that in the wake of the Sandy Hook
massacre there was support for action to be taken against video
games across the political spectrum, with Donald Trump tweeting
“Video game violence & glorification must be stopped—it is
creating monsters!” and Vice President Joe Biden proposing a tax on
video games.  

It was not only Lanza’s penchant for violent video games that
some thought could in some way be linked to his violence; others
pointed out that he had Asperger syndrome although, as Sullum
points out, The New York Times noted that “there is no
evidence that people with Asperger’s are more likely than others to
commit violent crimes.”

Last year, Kotaku
published an article on what 25 years of research on violence and
video games has come up with. Kotaku notes that, “While there are
no documented scientific links between video games and criminal
violence, the question of whether violent video games lead to
aggression has been hotly debated.”

The article goes on to point out that “there have been two major
meta-analyses” done on data relating to video games and violence
and that the two groups that did studies on the data came to
different conclusions.

Scientists such as
Brad Bushman and Craig Anderson believe that there is “a definitive
causal link between games and aggressive behavior.” The Kotaku
article notes that there is a distinction between aggression and
criminal violence:

That distinction between criminal violence and aggression is
critical. Science has yet to show any links between video games and
violence, but violent games may have a more subtle effect on
children: for example, they could make a child more inclined to
bully or spread rumors about his peers.

However, researchers Chris Ferguson and Cheryl Olsen, who
examined the same data as Bushman and Anderson, believe that there
is no conclusive evidence between violence and video games.
Ferguson told Kotaku:

I think anybody who tells you that there’s any kind of
consistency to the aggression research is lying to you, quite
frankly… There’s no consistency in the aggression literature, and
my impression is that at this point it is not strong enough to draw
any kind of causal, or even really correlational links between
video game violence and aggression, even, no matter how weakly we
may define aggression.

For more from Reason on video games click here, and be sure to check
out Reason‘s June 2014 video game-themed issue.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/QYTV6m
via IFTTT

Gene Healy Says Obama Is Right on Clemency for Non-Violent Drug Offenders

Last week, leading
conservatives raised the alarm about yet another terrifying
instance of “presidential lawlessness” from President Obama.
What is it this time? New revelations of dragnet spying? Targeting
more American citizens with flying robot assassins? Nope: He’s
going to let more nonviolent drug offenders out of prison. Some
conservatives are caterwauling, but Gene Healy says that after more
than a trillion dollars and incalculable human costs, and a
four-decade war on drugs has helped give us an incarceration rate
that’s unrivaled—and unenvied—in the Western world, the president’s
decision is the right one.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1hNuCP0
via IFTTT

Department of Education Says Tufts University Sexual Assault Policy Violates Title IX

The U.S. Department of Education (ED) has found
Boston-based Tufts University
to be out of compliance with Title IX
due to its handling of
student sexual assault on campus. The case highlights what’s become
a common and controversial
application of Title IX
—the statute designed to prevent
sex-based discrimination in education—as well as the ED’s increased
meddling in
matters of campus sexual assault
 and harassment. 

The ED’s Office for Civil Rights, which handles Title IX
enforcement, is currently investigating
the Univesity of Chicago
,
Harvard
,
Columbia University
, and Tufts for allegations of mishandling
sexual assault cases. The Tufts case stems from a complaint filed
by a female student in September 2010. From
The Boston Globe

The unnamed Tufts undergraduate … (said) that the school had
discriminated against her on the basis of gender in how it
responded to her report that she was sexually assaulted by her
boyfriend at that time. She also said the university retaliated
against her by threatening to remove her from a selective
leadership program if she refused to attend weekly seminars with
her alleged attacker, according to a letter the Office for Civil
Rights sent Monaco Monday.

Ultimately, in June 2011, Tufts found there was insufficient
evidence to sustain her allegations. She was put on probation after
a finding that she had fabricated a letter about her medical
conditions and had not been truthful with university officials,
according to the Office for Civil Rights.

The accused student was also put on probation for having
misrepresented himself as a Tufts medical student to obtain
confidential medical information about his accuser.

In a Monday ruling, the ED did not fault Tufts’s ultimate
decision in the case, nor did it find that Tufts retaliated against
the accusing student. But it did decide that Tufts is not complying
with federal guidelines on how schools should address sexual
assault cases.

Specifically, it faulted Tufts for waiting six months to launch
an investigation into the student’s assault complaints, not issuing
a decision for another 12 months, and allowing potentially
prejudicial information in the disciplinary case. That’s no doubt
inexcusably shoddy handling of the situation from the
university—but a form of “gender discrimination?” 

Routine bureaucratic incompetence and oversight could also fit
the bill.

Failure to “reach an agreement” with the Office for Civil Rights
could result in Tufts losing all federal funding. But though Tufts
listed an array of improvements it had made in sexual assault
policies since 2010 (and agreed to compensate the student), it
objected to the ED’s finding that it’s in violation of Title
IX.

“Tufts’ refusal to go along with the Office for Civil Rights may
be the beginning of a backlash from universities against what some
see as excessive government intervention,” The Globe
notes. 

Terry W. Hartle, senior vice president at the American Council
on Education, said many colleges believe that the Office for Civil
Rights often fails to negotiate in good faith, with Washington
officials frequently vetoing agreements hammered out by regional
government lawyers.

He saw the action against Tufts as posturing prior to a White
House event planned for Tuesday, when the findings of a task force
on sexual assault are expected to be released.

Since 2011, the ED has investigated dozens of American
colleges—including
Yale
, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and

Occidental College
—on allegations of Title IX violations based
on handling of sexual assault cases. 

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1nCIpLK
via IFTTT

America’s Nine Classes: The New Class Hierarchy

Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith of OfTwoMinds blog,

Eight of the nine classes are hidebound by conventions, neofeudal and neocolonial arrangements and a variety of false choices.

There are many ways to slice and dice America's power/wealth hierarchy. The conventional class structure is divided along the lines of income, i.e. the wealthy, upper middle class, middle class, lower middle class and the poor.

I've suggested that a more useful scheme is to view America through the lens not just of income but of political power and state dependency, as a Three-and-a-Half Class Society(October 22, 2012):

The three-and-a-half class society is comprised of: the "entrenched incumbents" on top (the "half class"), the high-earners who pay most of the taxes (the first class), the working poor who pay Social Security payroll taxes and sales taxes (the second class), and State dependents who pay nothing (the third class).

This class structure has political ramifications. In effect, those paying most of the tax are in a pressure cooker: the lid is sealed by the "entrenched incumbents" on top, and the fire beneath is the Central State's insatiable need for more tax revenues to support the entrenched incumbents and its growing army of dependents.

A recent Foreign Policy article on China's New Class Hierarchy: A Guide inspired me to assemble America's nine classes.

1. The Deep State. Mike Lofgren offered this description of the Deep State in Anatomy of the Deep State:

The Deep State is a hybrid association of elements of government and parts of top-level finance and industry that is effectively able to govern the nation without reference to the consent of the governed as expressed through the formal political process.

I describe the U.S. Deep State as the National Security State which enables a vast Imperial structure that incorporates hard and soft power–military, diplomatic, intelligence, finance, commercial, energy, media, higher education–in a system of global dominance.

The key feature of the Deep State is that it makes decisions behind closed doors that the surface government ratifies and implements.

The number of people in the Deep State class is small: senior Federal officials (NSA, Pentagon, State, Treasury, etc.), Executive Branch officials and key private-sector players.

Membership in the Deep State class is not dependent on wealth so much as on relationships and power.

2. The Oligarchs. Oligarchy is in the news–for example We're Headed for Oligarchy–and a number of descriptors are somewhat interchangeable: corporatocracy, plutocracy, etc. I have used Financial Aristocracy to invoke the neofeudal structure of our economy.

Whatever word you prefer, this small class is more or less the top .01% who owns a majority of the nation's financial wealth. They essentially own the political machinery of the nation, writing the rules of legislation that is supposedly regulating their industries, taxes, etc.

3. New Nobility. This is the super-wealthy class just below the Oligarchs. They own a singificant percentage of all assets but do not directly manage the political process like the Oligarch class. They hire lobbyists to protect their interests and constitute an influential political-financial class with global connections.

4. Upper Caste. I use this term to describe the technocrat/professional class that manages the Status Quo for the upper classes. They serve in both government and the private sector.

5. State Nomenklatura. In the Soviet Union, the Nomenklatura were the key administrators in all sectors. In the U.S., the Nomenklatura are well-paid government administrators with security and power. Collectively, they administer their own share of the swag, gaming the system to maximize their pensions, benefits, etc.

Together, the Upper Caste and the Nomenklatura comprise about 9% of the 121 million households in the U.S.: roughly 8.7 million households who earn between $145,000 and $250,000 annually. This class is the bulk of the top 7%, i.e. the top 90% to 97%.Household income in the United States.

The top level of the Upper Caste (2.8 million households) earns more than $250,000 annually. The Nomenklatura and Upper Caste number in total about 11.5 million households.

6. The Middle Class. While others attempt to define the middle class by income alone (many see a household income of around $50,000 as qualifying), I define the middle class not by income alone but by purchasing power, benefits and assets owned. What Does It Take To Be Middle Class? (December 5, 2013).

By this definition, the middle class is the cohort between 70% and 90%–households earning $80,000 or more. Even this is problematic, because in high-cost cities $80,000 is not enough to sustain middle-class conventions (owning a home, two vehicles, etc.) while it may be ample in lower-cost regions.

This 20% comprises about 24 million households.

The lower middle class–what I define as having some but not all of the attributes of full middle class membership–is the cohort between 50% and 70%–households earning more than $55,000 annually.

This class also comprises about 20% (24 million) of all households.

If you think this is too restrictive, please read my above analysis of middle class membership. It may change your view of what constitutes middle-class.

7. The Working Poor. Roughly 38 million households have earned income but it is not sufficient to secure the basics of middle class life. Many qualify for social welfare programs such as food stamps and Medicaid.
This class is about 30% of all households.

8. State Dependents. Though often labeled "poor," those with minimal legal employment may be living better than the working poor, due to generous social welfare benefits such as Section 8 (housing), Medicaid (healthcare), child care, food stamps, disability, etc., and black-market sources of cash income. This class is comprised of the bottom 20% of households.

9. Mobile Creatives. This is an emerging class that ranges across many income classifications and thus cannot be described by income alone. Some earn Upper Caste incomes, others are Working Poor. This class is self-employed, free-lance, entrepreneural, sole proprietors with adaptive skills. They may collaborate with other Creatives rather than have employees, and may have part-time jobs.

There are roughly 5.5 million incorporated self-employed people in the U.S.; these tend to be professionals such as attorneys, engineers and physicians. These self-employed are generally members of the Upper Caste.

The Mobile Creatives (which include small farmers, craftspeople, independent programmers, etc.) number around 10 million, or 8% of the workforce. I use the word mobile here not to suggest mobility between physical places (though that is one factor in this class's flexibility) but mobility between sectors and ways of earning income.

Members of this class might take a short-term paying gig if the pay and circumstance is attractive, and then return to self-employment. They tend to foster multiple income streams and in general operate by the principle trust the network, not the corporation or the state.

Some members of this class joined the cohort involuntarily, as the result of layoffs; others pursue this livelihood for its freedom, flexibility (important to parents of young children or those caring for elderly parents) and potential for self-expression.

This is the "wild card" class that falls outside all conventional class/income hierarchies. It includes those seeking outlier wealth and those who have chosen voluntary poverty.

Though this class wields little conventional financial or political power, it has a potentially large leadership role in social and technical innovations. This is the 4% Pareto Distribution that can exert outsized influence on the 64%.

The other eight classes are hidebound by conventions, neofeudal and neocolonial arrangements and a variety of false choices and illusions of choice, including democracy itself.

I will end this examination of the Nine Classes of America with this question: which class is having more fun? Your answer may say more about your aspirations and worldview than the class hierarchy itself.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1iCGfcq Tyler Durden

Study: One Out of Twenty Five Death Row Inmates Is Innocent

"i've seen them come and go and i've seen them die, and long ago I stopped asking why"How many American prisoners
have been wrongfully convicted of the crimes they’re serving time
for? Answering that question would help measure the effectiveness
the criminal justice system.

Researchers of a
study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences
tried to get to this answer by reviewing death
penalty cases. Because of the life-or-death stakes involved, a lot
more effort is exerted to exonerate death row inmates than any
other cohort of inmate.

In fact, according to the research, 1.7 percent of all death row
inmates are eventually exonerated. It’s a higher number than the
one quoted by Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in Kansas v.
Marsh
, a case about the death penalty. He claimed the error
rate was .027 percent. The researchers dismissed that number; they
say it was arrived at by extending the exoneration rate of a small
subgroup of inmates (capital cases) to the wider American prison
population.

Instead, the researchers used the exoneration rate on death row
and extended it to inmates whose capital punishment is replaced by
life imprisonment, at which point efforts to exonerate them largely
subside. Based on that idea, they estimate 4.1 percent, or one in
25, of all death row inmates are innocent, meaning that they would
be exonerated if they remained on death row.

In that context, laws like Florida’s recently enacted “Timely
Justice Act,” which aims to shorten the average time between a
sentence of death and the execution, only serve to increase the
likelihood an innocent person is executed by cutting the amount of
time the inmate has to use the courts to argue for his freedom.
It’s a bugaboo of capital punishment aficionados, this time death
row inmates spend trying not to be killed instead of actually being
killed. The entire appeals process associated with death row
drives the
cost of the death penalty
well above the cost of imprisoning
someone for life. This week’s new study shows the importance of
giving death row inmates adequate time to mount an appeal. It also
calls into question efforts inmates may make to get off death row
but remain in prison, as their chances of being successfully
exonerated drop precipitously once their life isn’t at stake.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/POcgCd
via IFTTT

Relax! SEC’s Mary Jo White Says “Markets Are Not Rigged” – Live Feed

During her testimomy to the House Financial Services Committee, SEC’s Mary Jo White confidently proclaimed (despite her questioner doubting her beliefs):

US SEC CHAIR MARY JO WHITE RESPONDS TO MICHAEL LEWIS BOOK IN TESTIMONY, TELLS CONGRESS “THE MARKETS ARE NOT RIGGED”

“Investors should be protected from shisters,” blasted the committee member, as he took White to task..

 




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1pKeLXd Tyler Durden

Toyota Says Sayonara (Sort Of) to the Golden State

Driving away with a brand new government subsidy!Texas Gov. Rick Perry is
probably looking a bit smugger than usual, if that’s at all
possible. In the latest commerce-war news between Texas and
California—a battle which California appears to be losing
badly—Toyota has announced it’s moving its headquarters from the
Golden State to the Lone Star State.

As a result, 3,000 jobs will be transferred to California to
Texas. Not everybody will be going, though. According to the
Associated Press, 2,300 jobs will remain in California after the
move. But before we mock high-tax, high-regulation California for
getting another kick in the moneybasket,
let’s see how Perry lured Toyota there
:

Perry, who made two visits to California to lure employers to
his state, said Texas offered Toyota $40 million in incentives from
the taxpayer-funded Texas Enterprise Fund. The Republican governor
said Toyota is expected to invest $300 million in the new
headquarters.

Guess I’ll put the streamers and confetti away. Here’s a

list
(pdf) of all the poor, desperate companies that needed
Texas’ help to find a new home, to the tune of about $465 million
in taxpayer funds so far. Besides such mom-and-pop shops like
Toyota, Texas Enterprise Fund (TEF) awards have gone to needy folks
like Bank of America, Home Depot, Lockheed Martin, and Samsung.

Yes, California is indeed a
terrible, awful, high-tax, high-regulation place
to do
business. The mayor of Torrance spells it out:

“When you look at the whole package, it’s difficult to be a
business here,” lamented Torrance Mayor Frank Scotto, whose
community on the edge of the Pacific will suffer as the jobs
migrate to Texas.

“If all these great, high-end jobs are leaving California, then
we are going to turn into a place that’s a retirement community”
with low-paying service-sector jobs, Scotto said. “We can’t have
that,” he added, warning that unless the state has a change of
attitude, “it’s going to be way too late.”

The system that Texas is using to win this fight should give
small government supporters pause, though. This method writ large
feeds the existing cold war-style battle where states use tax
dollars to lure in businesses from other states. That’s the entire
purpose of the TEF program. Many of the businesses who have gotten
money from the program were also donors to Gov. Perry. But as the
Fort Worth Star-Telegram
noted in 2011
, leaders in Texas feel as though they have to
engage in this sort of competition because other states do it, too.
This method may bring home the votes, but arguably it delays real
wealth generation and economic growth due to the costs of the
program. It’s part of the same mistaken belief that publicly funded
sports facilities “generate” commerce when they really just shift
it from one community to another (if that). Even states with
conservative reputations are afraid to stop, though, unless all the
other states stop, too.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1iCp7Dr
via IFTTT

The New Normal American Dream: Homeownership Rate Plunges To 19 Year Low; Asking Rents Soar To Record High

Each quarter, when we perform our regular update on trends in US homeownership and rents using Census Bureau data, we say that “The American Homeownership Dream is officially dead. Long live the New Normal American Dream: Renting.” One thing we added in 2013 is that the American Dream has now officially became a full-blown nightmare after mortgage rates exploded, even if declining modestly afterward, and in the process pummeling the affordability of housing as well as grounding any new mortgage-funded transactions to a complete halt (don’t believe us – just ask the tens of thousands of mortgage brokers let go by the TBTF banks in the past 6 months) while sending mortgage origination activity to record lows. Which is why it was not at all surprising to find that the just updated Q1 homeownership rate was 64.8% – the lowest in 19 years!

 

Furthermore, even as household formation has continued to implode (more on that in a subsequent post) despite the shrill promises of housing bulls who still have to realize that the transitory pick up in home prices has nothing to do with organic growth or a stable consumer, and all to do with the Fed’s balance sheet, the now effectively finished REO-To-Rent program, and illegal offshore cash parked in the US, Americans have to live somewhere. That somewhere is as renters of Wall Street and other landlords. As the next chart shows, the median asking rent has soared to fresh records and hitting an all time high of $766 as of the first quarter.

 

Luckily Owner Equivalent Rent is largely adjusted (hedonically) by the Fed in its CPI calculation making it seem quite friendly, or else its all time highs may give the impression that inflation is not quite as dead as the Fed portrays it. Although don’t tell that to renters in the Northeast, where the average rent just soared to $1,043, a record increase of 16%, or $147 compared to a year ago.

At least one entity is enjoying this wealth extraction from the middle class which no longer being able to afford buying a home is forced to hand over an ever greater portion of its paycheck to America’s largest landlord – Wall Street’s very own BlackRock.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/QYIA6k Tyler Durden