Peter Schiff: The Worst Pre-Election Stock Market Ever

Peter Schiff: The Worst Pre-Election Stock Market Ever

Tyler Durden

Mon, 11/02/2020 – 11:15

Via SchiffGold.com,

The US stock market is coming off its worst week since March. It was also the worst pre-election stock market in history. In his latest podcast, Peter talked about the market, the election and what’s likely ahead.

A weak stock market right before election day doesn’t bode well for President Trump’s reelection, given that he’s touted the stock market as his great accomplishment. Peter has said he doesn’t think Trump will win and that the stock market would ultimately sell off on the reality of a Biden presidency – that it would be “buy the rumor, sell the fact.”

Well, apparently they’re not waiting for the fact and they’re selling on the rumors. They bought on the rumor Biden was going to win and now they’re selling on the rumor that he’s going to win, because a Biden victory is not good for the stock market. It means much higher taxes and that is not going to be offset by the Federal Reserve.”

Most people seem to think that regardless of who wins, even if we have a contested election and don’t know a winner for days or weeks, it really won’t be a problem for the markets because the Federal Reserve will step in and backstop it. Everybody seems confident that the Fed has their back.

The only leg that this market is standing on is the Federal Reserve and money printing. But ultimately, that’s not going to be enough. The market is not going to be able to survive when that is the only support.”

Tech stocks were hit particularly hard during last week’s sell-off. The NASDAQ had the biggest decline on Friday and is down over 11% from its September high. But even with the drop, many tech stocks still have sky-high valuations.

Typically, a big selloff in stocks means a strong bond market, but last week, the bond market was also relatively weak. Long-term interest rates were up. Normally, when you see people running to get out of stock, they move into bonds.

There was no refuge this week because even if you had a diversified portfolio, you were down on your stocks and you were down on your bonds. Yes, your bonds went down less than stocks, but everything went down and nothing went up.”

Peter said he thinks this will compound problems in the stock market. Typically, a surging bond market during a stock market selloff helps mitigate the pain. When bonds rise as stocks fall, the lower interest rates help stock valuations. Rising bond prices also offset stock losses for those with diversified portfolios. But if both stocks and bonds are falling at the same time, you have no gains to offset losses. You just have losses on top of your losses.

So, I think this is going to be particularly brutal, because not a lot of people have hedges that are outside of traditional US stocks and bonds. There’s not a lot of investors that have gold or gold stocks that are hedging their portfolio. I think eventually they will. As I’ve been saying for a while, I think gold is going to be the last safe haven standing and ultimately that’s where all the safe-haven money is going to flow.”

Gold also sold off this week. As we have reported, it looked an awful lot like early March with everything selling off. But gold wasn’t down significantly and it rallied a bit on Friday. Peter doesn’t think we’re going to see a significant drop in gold this time around, even if stocks really crash.

Given where the Fed is, given how much money has already been printed, given how much money is going to be printed, I just don’t think you’re going to see any kind of significant weakness in the price of gold. So, any weakness that you get is going to be a buy signal.”

Meanwhile, the Fed has already thrown out one lifeline, lowering the limit on its Main Street lending program to small businesses to $100,000. Peter asked a key question: why does the Fed even need to run such a program? Why can’t small businesses just get these loans from their banks? Answer: they aren’t credit-worthy.

They know they’re not going to get the money back because these companies are bad credit risks and so private lenders don’t want to make the loans. Now, why should the government do that? If these businesses can’t repay the loans, why is the government lending them any money? And it’s not really a loan. If you’re loaning money to businesses that can’t repay it, it’s not really a loan, it’s a grant, or it’s a gift. But you know it sounds a lot better if you can pretend it’s a loan. But this is all pure inflation. The Fed is just printing up money and handing it out to small businesses.”

Peter said he thinks this explains the number of small businesses being created in the midst of an economic collapse. They can take advantage of this giveaway and get money from the government.

Of course, none of this is constitutional. And it’s bad economics. Peter said the craziest thing is nobody even seems to care.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/35Y7Oug Tyler Durden

Kamala Harris Says Equal Outcomes Should Be the Goal of Public Policy

polspphotos735211

Democratic vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris provided narration for a short animated clip that appeared on her Twitter feed Sunday. In the clip, Harris gives voice to a leftist-progressive narrative about the importance of equity—equal outcomes—rather than mere equality before the law.

“There’s a big difference between equality and equity,” says Harris. “Equality suggests, ‘Oh, everyone should get the same amount.’ The problem with that, not everybody’s starting in the same place.”

Harris contrasted equal treatment—all people getting the same thing—with equitable treatment, which means “we all end up at the same place.”

This may seem like a trivial difference, but when it comes to public policy, the difference matters. A government should be obligated to treat all citizens equally, giving them the same access to civil rights and liberties like voting, marriage, religious freedom, and gun ownership. The government cannot deny rights to certain people because they are black, female, Muslim, etc.—this would be unequal treatment.

A mandate to foster equity, though, would give the government power to violate these rights in order to achieve identical social results for all people. In accordance with this thinking, the authorities might be justified in giving some people more rights than others. Indeed, this would arguably be strictly necessary, in order to create a society where everyone ends up in the exact same situation.

Conservatives swiftly condemned Harris’s tweet in characteristically dramatic fashion: Rep. Liz Cheney (R–Wyo.) accused Harris of sounding “just like Karl Marx.” Harris probably isn’t a committed Marxist—if anything, her core ideology seems to be whatever the current political moment calls for—but it’s probably true that the people on her staff who helped make this video are well-informed about the sort of lingo that appeals to young progressive activists. This cohort is certainly interested in radical ideas like using wealth redistribution to engineer leftist social outcomes.

If the Biden-Harris ticket triumphs on Election Day, expect some of these people to find themselves staffing the vast federal bureaucracy, taking jobs in the Departments of Education, Labor, Housing, and elsewhere. There are a million different ways for these bureaucrats to make marginal, under-the-radar policy changes that support an equity-over-equality worldview. That’s a far greater danger than Harris’s earnest and clumsy attempts to woo the wokest of the woke.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3kT6yyF
via IFTTT

“This Is Huge”: World’s Biggest IPO Trades 50% Higher In Gray Market After $3 Trillion In Retail Orders

“This Is Huge”: World’s Biggest IPO Trades 50% Higher In Gray Market After $3 Trillion In Retail Orders

Tyler Durden

Mon, 11/02/2020 – 10:55

Last week we reported that thanks to what may be the world’s most sophisticated check kiting scheme, Chinese and Hong Kong banks were giving local retail investors a mindblowing 33x margin leverage with which they could then turn around and purchase stock in what is now the world’s largest IPO China’s fintech Ant Financial, which is set to raise $34.5BN in new capital for its dual listing in Hong Kong and Shanghai ahead of its trading debut on Nov. 5, surpassing the former champion, Saudi Aramco.

As a result, the retail portion was a ludicrous 870 times oversubscribed as bidding was so intense in Hong Kong that one brokerage’s platform briefly shut down after becoming overwhelmed by orders. This in turn gave confidence to institutions that there is no way the stock would drop, leading to a mindblowing 284x oversubscription for institutional investors (this is real money).

Demand for Hong Kong shares was so strong that Ant stopped taking orders from professional investors a day earlier than scheduled. Institutions and strategic investors may take up about 97.5% of the offering in Hong Kong, according to Ant’s prospectus, though the figures may change due to clawback and greenshoe provisions.

Putting these numbers in context, last Thursday, the Chinese financial-technology giant said individual investors in mainland China had placed the equivalent of more than $2.8 trillion of orders for their slice of Ant’s record-breaking initial public offering, which is listing simultaneously in Shanghai and Hong Kong.

While it is hardly a surprise that investors, when given free 33x leverage, will go insane this number is simply staggering: according to the WSJ, it exceeds the value of all the stocks listed on the exchanges of Germany or Canada. Mom-and-pop investors in Hong Kong have also clamored to buy into this IPO, betting that Ant will soar in value after it goes public next Thursday.

While the number of orders is in itself mind-blowing, it is even more impressive given the high hurdles for participating in IPOs on Shanghai’s new STAR Market, a Nasdaq-style technology-focused board that launched last year where Ant will trade: Individuals must have at least two years of stock-trading experience and brokerage-account assets totaling at least 500,000 yuan, the equivalent of $74,300. The IPOs are routinely heavily oversubscribed and stocks often soar after listing, which is to be expected: with retail investors putting down just 3% equity, anything less than a surge could lead to a historic crash.

In any case, with unprecedented, record demand for Ant shares, it is hardly a surprise that as Bloomberg reports overnight, institutional investors have been buying Ant’s shares at a 50% premium in the gray-market, signaling the Chinese fintech giant is poised to soar in its debut this week following the world’s largest initial public offering, as some trades were executed as high as  HK$120 ($15.50) in gray-market trading Monday, compared with the listing price of HK$80.

According to Bloomberg, in the so-called gray market, investors can bid for new shares before they officially start trading on a stock exchange.

The over-the-counter mechanism is often seen as an early indicator of investor demand for an IPO. Retail buyers will be able to trade through a similar channel a day before Ant’s Thursday debut.

“This is huge: the largest IPO ever, priced at the top end and now this huge premium in the gray market,” said Gary Dugan, chief executive officer of the Global CIO Office in Singapore, which didn’t take part in the IPO. “It’s pretty extraordinary given the backdrop and it shows you how much Asia is decoupling from the United States.”

“The market’s infatuation with growth stocks is very strong at the moment,” said Arnout van Rijn, chief investment officer for Asia-Pacific at Robeco. With many investors betting China’s domestic economy will be sheltered from the trade war with the U.S., “it’s not surprising that there’s more demand than supply for a stock like this.”

Of course, with retail going all in the stock, it makes the margin of risk for institutions even more attractive as Beijing will not allow Ant to drop, crashing retail sentiment. As a result, the IPO is also attracting interest from some of the world’s biggest money managers.  T. Rowe Price Group Inc., UBS Asset Management and FMR LLC, the parent of Fidelity Investments, are among the money managers angling for a piece of the deal, a Bloomberg source said.

All this foreign interest means that more than HK$252 billion has flowed into the city since September 14, forcing the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the de facto central bank, to intervene almost 50 times to try to weaken the Hong Kong dollar.

This is also why contrary to the expectations by China skeptics such as Kyle Bass, Hong Kong’s fund flows continue to flood into the territory rather than out, because China has figured out that the simplest way to ensure it never has a dollar shortage is to guarantee that foreign investors will always make money on such massive equity offerings.

And as long as China has companies that go public – and are 1000x oversubscribed – the foreign capital inflows will continue. Which is the Ant IPO is about so much more than the world’s biggest IPO – it explains how HK, and by extension China, funnels foreign (mostly dollar) capital to make sure that there is never a full-blown run on the world’s reserve currency.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/384iZUU Tyler Durden

Michigan Gun Stores Cleaned Out Over Fears About Election Unrest

Michigan Gun Stores Cleaned Out Over Fears About Election Unrest

Tyler Durden

Mon, 11/02/2020 – 10:35

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

Gun stores in Michigan are being “cleaned out” by people buying firearms for the first time over fears that there could be massive civil unrest following tomorrow’s presidential election.

Detroit gun shop owner Bill Kucyk told Sky News that his store was being inundated by people who don’t really know how to purchase or handle weapons but are desperate to acquire them.

“They don’t even know the process,” said Kucyk.

“They just want to buy guns – and I’m getting about a hundred calls a day about it,” he added.

Kucyk said he was struggling to keep up with demand as people clamor to stock up on guns before what many fear could be weeks of intense rioting should the election result be contested.

“Normally I’d have about a hundred guns in this cabinet but they’ve been sold twice over. The store has been cleaned out several times,” he commented.

Lexus Lewis, a young mother of two, was attempting to buy a shotgun but “was struggling to hold up to her shoulder” according to the report, with Kucyk remarking, “She’s going to need some serious training to use that.”

Lewis said that she was scared of what people were capable of doing given recent events.

“All of this is new,” she said. “I’ve always been a little insecure living in Detroit, Michigan, but it’s all new to me… people are doing things that we’ve never even thought about doing before… taking it to limits that we never thought about going before.”

The rest of the article goes on to blame the emergence of “militia groups” as the reason for why people are buying guns, completely ignoring the real reason, which is the fact that left-wing extremists representing Antifa and Black Lives Matter have been rioting in American cities for the last 5 months.

*  *  *

New limited edition merch now available! Click here.

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here. Also, I urgently need your financial support here.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3jUfsL0 Tyler Durden

If you’re thinking about leaving…

Canada has been busy for weeks creating contingency plans for tomorrow’s US Presidential election.

A lot of Canadians seem worried that their country will be inundated by violent, plague-infested Americans fleeing the election results.

That’s probably a bit of a stretch. But this does seem to be a recurring theme.

Every four years there are always a bunch of people– usually very out of touch celebrities– who threaten to leave the US if their candidate doesn’t win.

And Canada is a perennial favorite destination among these famous American would-be political refugees.

I never really quite understood this; sure, Canada’s great. But the world is a big place. And, especially now, with so many people no longer constrained by geography due to Covid, it makes sense to expand one’s escape plan beyond just a single country.

Consider Mexico, for example.

Mexico is the country that the US federal government has tried so hard to block for immigration purposes. Yet in an ironic twist of fate, Mexico is one of the only countries still welcoming to Americans.

Right now US citizens have limited options for international travel. But Mexico is still open, including to Americans.

You can enter Mexico without a visa, and stay for up to 180 days, no questions asked.

One of our Sovereign Man team members did this recently, enjoying a great deal of freedom on Mexico’s Gulf coast, as well as a fantastic lifestyle at minimal cost.

He told us recently that he went to a barber and paid just $4 for haircut (including a generous tip), then treated his family to a delicious lunch at a great restaurant for less than what McDonalds would have cost in the US.

Safety was not a concern; this region of Mexico is about as ‘dangerous’ as Wyoming in terms of crime incidents.

So, Mexico presents an opportunity to spend 6 months on the beach, avoid strict lockdowns, distance yourself from politics and riots, and save a ton of money.

Probably the only other places that rival Mexico’s low cost of living in the Western Hemisphere are Colombia, Argentina, and Ecuador.

(Panama and Costa Rica, for example, are also great expat destinations, but both have become costlier in recent years.)

Sure, you could easily pay New York prices for dinner at a world-class restaurant in Mexico City, or even in Cancun.

But if you are willing to venture beyond the typical tourist traps, you’ll be pleasantly surprised.

Playa Del Carmen is touristy, and therefore not very cheap by Mexican standards. And still, a family of four could live comfortably on $3,000 a month, rent included.

Temporary residency in Mexico is easy to acquire for anyone who can prove they have sufficient savings or income– you’ll need at least $1,700 per month after taxes, plus $700 for each dependent.

After four years of temporary residency, you can upgrade to permanent residency. That is a great asset that gives you another option to live and work (or escape) outside of your home country.

Retirees have a shortcut to permanent residency in Mexico, as long as you can prove you are officially retired and have a pension or Social Security income of at least $2,800 per month.

After five years of legal residency, you can apply for naturalization, which means becoming a Mexican citizen, and obtaining a Mexican passport.

And most of these options can be started now from your nearest consulate, before you even set foot on Mexican soil.

Although it is rare, there are other countries that offer easy residency, various paths to citizenship, and a low cost of living.

But Mexico remains one of the very few places on earth open to travelers from the United States and Europe; there are still plenty of nonstop flights between Mexico and cities like Houston, Paris, Miami, New York, Madrid, Los Angeles, Amsterdam, etc.

So you’re thinking about leaving… whether due to strict lockdowns, peaceful protests, inevitably higher taxes, or simply to retire in peace, Mexico might be worth considering.

Source

from Sovereign Man https://ift.tt/3233GrO
via IFTTT

Under a New Law, People Charged With Hate Crimes Are Disproportionately Black and Homeless

dreamstime_xxl_102386619

South Carolina is one of just a few states lacking a hate crime law, so in 2019, Columbia’s city council passed an ordinance to establish one locally. A year later, the results are in: Five of six people to face charges under the ordinance are black, and several are homeless.

“If that is happening, it is an unintended consequence,” Councilman Howard Duvall told The Post and Courier, which reported on the unanticipated results.

In at least two cases, police were called to the scene to deal with homeless people who then referred to the cops using slurs. The victims were the police, according to the paper:

Rickey Smith, another Black man who listed a homeless shelter as his address, was believed to be under the influence of drugs while begging on a street corner along North Main Street on May 12, according to police reports.

While on patrol, the officer saw Smith in the roadway, weaving between cars and slowing evening rush-hour traffic. Smith ran when he saw the officer, according to police reports.

When the officer caught him, the two wrestled to the ground, with Smith accused of balling his hands into fists while atop the officer, police reports say. Reports say he used unidentified racial slurs toward the officer, who is White, and threatened other bystanders. He also allegedly hurled similar slurs and threats at medical staff when taken to the hospital.

Columbia has inadvertently simulated one of the principal problems with hate crime laws: Their enforcement reflects existing societal inequities. Far from preventing some scourge of hate, these well-intended laws typically result in over-incarcerated populations receiving harsher sentences.

This happens by design. Contrary to the imaginations of those who do not understand the First Amendment, it is unconstitutional for the government to outlaw hateful expression on its own. Hate crime laws pass muster because they criminalize speech that maligns a specific protected category—race, sex, sexual orientation, etc.—while a crime is being committed. It is not illegal to use a racial slur, but under a hate crime law, using a racial slur while committing vandalism, assault, or robbery could result in additional charges.

As a result, people who have more encounters with the police in the first place are going to find themselves in situations where hate crime charges could be a factor. This means that hate crime laws, by and large, are not mounting some significant challenge to resurgent white nationalism. Instead, they are often additional penalties for communities that are already worse off. And remember, the authorities have no evidence that the existence of such laws deters hate crimes at all.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2HRVFP4
via IFTTT

Pennsylvania Election Officials Rattled After Trump Campaign Requests Names Of Ballot Transporters, Storage Locations

Pennsylvania Election Officials Rattled After Trump Campaign Requests Names Of Ballot Transporters, Storage Locations

Tyler Durden

Mon, 11/02/2020 – 10:15

Elections officials in Cumberland County, Pennsylvania were rattled last week after a Trump campaign aide requested ‘highly specific details’ about the county’s ballot security, according to The Sentinel.

Cumberland County Bureau of Elections Director Bethany Salzarulo demonstrates how the new voting machines work March 3 at the Cumberland County Bureau of Elections in Carlisle. (via The Sentinel)

A Tuesday email from Trump aide Leslie O’Shaughnessy requested the names of people transporting ballots from voting machines once polls close, the names of people with access to the ballots, and locations where ballots are stored – including room numbers.

County Commissioner Gary Eichelberger (R) called the request ‘intrusive,’ and suggested that it might disrupt the election process in the county of 253,000 residents.

It’s almost kind of chilling the sort of data they wanted us to provide,” said Eichelberger. “This is basically the whole security plan. We’ve never received a request of this detail and I find it troubling that one of the interested parties [in the election outcome] feels they have a right to information that obviously could jeopardize the security of the ballots.”

Campaign spokeswoman Thea McDonald told the Washington Post that the request was for “standard election transparency details,” and that the campaign had been in touch with out counties – “some of which transparently provided answers to these important, reasonable questions via less formal requests.”

“As part of the Trump campaign’s efforts to ensure a free and fair election, we have asked county clerks for information so that we can gain a detailed understanding of voting processes — and the similarities and differences that may exist in different jurisdictions,” she told the Post in an emailed statement.

The email contained an attached, bullet-pointed list of the details requested, which O’Shaughnessy described as being pursuant to “your office’s compliance with existing statutes and law.”

“Please respond to these questions no later than 5:00 pm EST, tomorrow, Wednesday, October 28, 2020,” the email stated, asking for the response to be sent to a Gmail account bearing O’Shaughnessy’s name, and also including a phone number.

the details O’Shaughnessy asked for in her email do not concern ballot verification; rather, they are specific physical security details for ballots and voting machines.

These include information on “the location(s) that ballots are immediately sent to when polls close (including address and room number)” as well as “the individuals who transport the ballots to the location(s).

The campaign is also asking for “the time(s) when are ballots are transported to canvass site,” information on any security provided, and “the best point of contact for each storage location(s) of the ballots.” –The Sentinel

“Given that more than 500,000 mail ballots were tossed out in this year’s primaries, we must look into these critical issues ahead of November,” McDonald told the Sentinel, linking to a Washington Post article on the volume of vote-by-mail ballots which were disqualified in the spring due to missing signatures, illegible marks, late arrivals and other reasons.

Read the rest of the report here.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2GolExe Tyler Durden

Major Cities Spend Weekend Prepping for Possible Election Night Riots

zumaglobalten450990

With questions lingering over whether President Donald Trump will declare victory before all ballots are counted, an already tense election could be taking an especially dark turn. Whether justified or not, fears of official shenanigans and election night rioting have prompted people and businesses in big cities across the country to start freaking out, boarding up, and preparing for possible riots.

On the one hand, all the boarded-up businesses and at-the-ready riot cops seem a bit overwrought. Americans have disagreed passionately about candidates and even presidential election results before without taking to the streets and burning shit down.

But Trump and Republicans have spent the past several months telling their supporters that voter fraud would be widespread this year, and in the past week they’ve only kicked up attempts to delegitimize election results should Democrats prove victorious. If victory is called for Joe Biden, there could be a lot of folks genuinely convinced that the results are a sham—and ready to do something about it.

Meanwhile, Biden supporters (or those who at least consider him the lesser of two evils) have seen weeks of polls and pundits telling them their guy will almost definitely win, while watching the GOP try hard to cast any scenario where Trump doesn’t win as suspect. And, according to Axios, Trump told those close to him that he will declare victory if he happens to have a lead as election night closes—all those yet-to-be-counted ballots be damned—though he has also publicly denied this.

Should anything like that happen, a lot of Americans will be justifiably irate and ready to do something about it. But with anger over Trump as intense as it is, even a seemingly legitimate victory would be likely to produce suspicion and some protests.

If history is any indication, whichever group might take to the streets on Tuesday night will be filled largely with law-abiding Americans who merely want to make their voices heard. But a minority who want to use more than just their voices can still be a seriously destructive force.

Businesses near city centers and protest hot spots aren’t crazy to take precautionary measures. What’s worrisome is the extra law enforcement cities are allegedly enlisting. If there’s one thing that can turn a boisterous-but-peaceful protest violent very quickly, it’s overzealous cops amped up on premonitions of chaos and fate-of-democracy-in-our-hands fantasies.

Faced with excessive action by authorities, even otherwise peaceful people may feel like more extreme action is justified and perhaps even helpful.

But “the first imperative of civil resistance is nonviolence—that is, maintaining the discipline not to strike out or strike back,” Judith Shulevitz reminds people at The Atlantic. And if the moral aspect isn’t enough, then think of practicality:

Nonviolence is effective for two reasons: The obvious one is that vandalism or fighting attributed to protesters, rightly or wrongly, will serve as an excuse for a crackdown. The less obvious but probably more important reason is that the ensuing chaos is sure to alienate the silent members of the public not yet sure which side to join.

In that sense, nonviolence undergirds the second rule of a winning protest strategy: It must pull in the mainstream. …. A prodemocracy movement’s most important constituencies are the institutions that keep society running: banks, businesses, the military, schools, the media, government bureaucracies, police, the judiciary.


FREE MINDS

More research disputes the conventional wisdom that the internet has led to people only consuming news that conforms to their biases. “The abundance of media options is a central feature of today’s information environment. Many accounts, often based on analysis of desktop-only news use, suggest that this increased choice leads to audience fragmentation, ideological segregation, and echo chambers with no cross-cutting exposure,” states the abstract of a new paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. And yet:

Contrary to many of those claims, this paper uses observational multiplatform data capturing both desktop and mobile use to demonstrate that coexposure to diverse news is on the rise, and that ideological self-selection does not explain most of that coexposure. We show that mainstream media outlets offer the common ground where ideologically diverse audiences converge online, though our analysis also reveals that more than half of the US online population consumes no online news, underlining the risk of increased information inequality driven by self-selection along lines of interest. For this study, we use an unprecedented combination of observed data from the United States comprising a 5-y time window and involving tens of thousands of panelists. Our dataset traces news consumption across different devices and unveils important differences in news diets when multiplatform or desktop-only access is used.


FREE MARKETS

Oregon will vote on lessening penalties for possession of all sorts of drugs. An initiative on the state’s 2020 ballot—Measure 110—would be a huge step forward, even if it’s not exactly the decriminalization measure many are making it out to be. If Measure 110 passes, Oregonians caught with small amounts of LSD, heroin, cocaine, and other “hard drugs” would no longer face incarceration or other harsh penalties, the Associated Press reports. But possession would still invite interaction with the cops and result in either a $100 fine or mandatory attendance at state-sponsored anti-drug classes.

“Oregon’s measure is backed by the Oregon Nurses Association, the Oregon chapter of the American College of Physicians and the Oregon Academy of Family Physicians,” A.P. notes.


ELECTION 2020

The Texas Supreme Court yesterday said no to an attempt to get nearly 127,000 ballots tossed. With no comment, the court rejected “a bid by three Republican candidates and a GOP activist to toss out almost 127,000 votes cast from drive-thru lanes in the emerging Democratic stronghold of Harris County,” reports the Austin American-Statesman. But these ballots are still in jeopardy:

A federal judge will hold an emergency hearing Monday morning — less than 21 hours before polls open on Election Day — to hear arguments on a similar challenge filed by the same group of Republicans, who say that state law prohibits drive-thru voting, so every vote cast from cars during the early voting period should be tossed out as illegal.

At the same hearing, U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen will weigh a request by Democratic organizations and the party’s U.S. Senate candidate, MJ Hegar, to join the case in defense of drive-thru voting — and the 126,911 votes cast that way.


QUICK HITS

• Actor Johnny Depp lost his libel suit against the British tabloid that called him a “wife beater.”

• Reproductive rights groups continue to report a rise in requests for at-home abortion pills.

• What we know about COVID-19’s long-term effects.

• There is no excuse for this:

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3ek45uE
via IFTTT

US Manufacturing Surveys Soar In October To 2-Year Highs

US Manufacturing Surveys Soar In October To 2-Year Highs

Tyler Durden

Mon, 11/02/2020 – 10:06

Following Europe’s continued Manufacturing PMI rebound, US manufacturing was expected to have stabilized at September’s  levels through October.

  • October US Manufacturing ISM BEAT 59.3 – vs 56.0 exp vs 55.4 prior

  • October US Manufacturing PMI BEAT – 53.4 vs 53.3 exp vs 53.2 prior

That is the highest Manufacturing PMI since Jan 2019, and highest ISM Manufacturing since Aug 2018, and these improvements happen as US macro data is serially disappointing…

Source: Bloomberg

Although domestic demand ticked higher, Markit reports that new export orders fell for the first time since July.

However, under the ISM hood, export orders improved…

And overall new orders rose at their fastest pace since Jan 2004…

Source: Bloomberg

And ISM respondents are a lot more positive than the mainstream media suggests…

Chris Williamson, Chief Business Economist at IHS Markit said:

“With clues being sought as to whether the economy can sustain its recovery after rebounding from lockdowns, the rise in the PMI in October is encouraging news. It’s inevitable that the pace of economic expansion will weaken after the surge seen in the third quarter, but the strength of the PMI hints at a recovery for which the underlying trend continues to strengthen at the start of the fourth quarter.

“Producers of investment goods such as business equipment and machinery are leading the upturn in a welcome sign of rising business confidence and corporate investment, but it was worrying to see consumer goods producers report weakened order book growth, reflecting rising virus-related worries. Going forward, much will naturally depend on the extent to which the economy can remain open and functioning in the face of rising virus case numbers.”

Finally, in case you agreed with government data that there’s no inflation…

Maybe tap the brakes Mr.Powell?

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3oLb6cZ Tyler Durden

Friendly’s Restaurant Files For Bankruptcy, Expect Many More

Friendly’s Restaurant Files For Bankruptcy, Expect Many More

Tyler Durden

Mon, 11/02/2020 – 10:00

Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk,

The Ice cream eatery has estimated liabilities of up to $100 million and no way to pay them.

Friendly’s Goes Under Again

Bloomberg reports Iconic Restaurant Chain Friendly’s Files for Bankruptcy

Friendly’s Restaurants LLC, an iconic chain on the East Coast of the U.S. known for its sundaes, became the latest dining institution to go bankrupt amid the pandemic.

The pandemic and lockdown have dragged down sales at restaurants around the world, and led many already-struggling eateries to buckle under debt loads. Pizza Hut franchisee’s NPC International Inc., the holding company of Chuck E. Cheese CEC Entertainment Inc. and the U.S. arm of Le Pain Quotidien have sought bankruptcy protection since the Covid-19 crisis started. 

This isn’t the brand’s first brush with bankruptcy. In 2011, Friendly Ice Cream Corp. and its subsidiaries, the operator of Friendly’s restaurants and a nationwide distributor of ice cream products, had entered Chapter 11.

More Lockdowns

COVID restrictions and lockdowns rise in US and Europe, as Trump’s rallies are blamed for cases.

Also note  Fauci, Warning of Bleak Winter, Draws White House Rebuke

As Mr. Trump toured the country assuring Americans that the U.S. has “turned the corner” on the coronavirus, Dr. Fauci looked ahead to the coming winter and declared that “you could not possibly be positioned more poorly.”

“We’re in for a whole lot of hurt,” Dr. Fauci said in an interview with The Washington Post published on Saturday.

Mr. Trump, in a battle for re-election and eager to portray the virus as tamed, has preferred the counsel of another pandemic adviser, Dr. Scott W. Atlas, who has questioned mask use and offered a number of other contrarian philosophies.

Ordinarily circumspect, Dr. Fauci directly criticized Dr. Atlas in the interview.

“I have real problems with that guy,” he said.

Agree with them or not, more lockdowns are coming.

This will be the final death bell for many chains and independents.

[ZH: In addition to Friendly’s, mall-owner CBL & Associates and Pennsylvania REIT also announced bankruptcy this morning.]

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2TPrgU4 Tyler Durden