After Leading School Closures, Berkeley Teachers’ Union Chief Busted Taking His Kid To In-Person Private Preschool

After Leading School Closures, Berkeley Teachers’ Union Chief Busted Taking His Kid To In-Person Private Preschool

Authored by Ryan Ledendecker via The Federalist Papers (emphasis ours)

The fight for the return of millions of schoolchildren to in-person learning continues to rage on, with various teachers unions wielding their political power to seemingly quash the idea, leaving America’s parents and students in a constant state of limbo while their academic progress continues to decline with remote learning.

That’s why Berkeley Federation of Teachers president Matt Meyer, who has incessantly preached about how unsafe it is for students to return to the classroom, came under fire from a local group of concerned moms after he was spotted dropping off his two-year-old daughter at a private learning institution for in-person learning, according to Fox News.

Guerilla Momz, a California group of concerned parents who are pushing for a return to in-classroom learning, captured video footage of Meyer dropping off his child, holding nothing back as they criticized his hypocrisy.

Meet Matt Meyer. White man with dreads and president of the local teachers’ union,” the group tweeted. “He’s been saying it is unsafe for *your kid* to be back at school, all the while dropping his kid off at private school.”

 After the video went viral around the country, Meyer was contacted by Fox News and, not surprisingly, attempted to justify his reason for taking his young child to in-person classes at a private institution while public school students remain in the dark.

There are major differences in running a small preschool and a 10,000 student public school district in terms of size, facilities, public health guidance and services that legally have to be provided,” Meyer said. “We all want a safe return to school. The Berkeley Federation of Teachers is excited that Berkeley Unified will be reopening soon with a plan, supported by our members and the district, to get our students back in classrooms starting later this month.

Meyer also took issue with the group of concerned mothers taking the video and posting it, calling it “very inappropriate” and remarked that it was a clear violation of his child’s privacy.

Some, like former PTA Berkeley Council president Mara Kolesas, said that Guerilla Momz took their attempts to expose Meyer too far and suggested that it’s an issue that needs to stay in the political realm.

“For me, you don’t need to attack people personally, you need to address it politically. When you start getting personal, you mix up dimensions, and you don’t get to discuss the real thing,” Kolesas said. “Here, the real thing is [Meyer] put fear before science, and the right of teachers before the right of kids. That’s the issue.”

While the idea of addressing the issue “politically” sounds good on paper, unfortunately, it’s not working. That’s ostensibly why the group of moms did what they did, to expose those who publicly insist on keeping kids home while quietly ushering their own children off to swanky, private institutions.

And Kolesas is simply flat wrong about Meyer “putting fear before science.” The “science” is clear — it’s absolutely acceptable and and completely safe to return children to the classroom, “politics” is what’s keeping that from happening.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 03/01/2021 – 18:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3sIvaxt Tyler Durden

“Major Flooding” Submerges Parts Of Kentucky As Gov. Beshear Declares State Of Emergency

“Major Flooding” Submerges Parts Of Kentucky As Gov. Beshear Declares State Of Emergency

After a weekend of torrential rain, Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear declared a state of emergency on Monday. State officials activated the State Emergency Operations Center to aid with rescue efforts as major flooding was observed, according to Lexington Herald-Leader

The declaration activated the Kentucky National Guard to assist first responders in water rescues, deliver supplies, and aid municipalities. 

“The impact of extremely heavy rainfall and flash flooding across the commonwealth led to numerous emergency rescues and evacuations in counties from west to east,” said Michael Dossett, director of the Kentucky Division of Emergency Management.

Three-day precipitation totals ending Mar. 1 show from Bowling Green to Somerset to Jackson to Pikesville at least 4 inches of rain was seen, in some areas, the totals are much higher. Bowling Green saw 5 to 7 inches, according to Meteorologist Ron Steve. Casey County had 6 inches, Boyle County had 5 inches and Madison County had 5 inches.

“Moderate flooding is expected along the Kentucky River, and could approach major flood thresholds in some locations,” tweeted National Weather Service (NWS) Louisville.

In Estill County, emergency management officials expect the Kentucky River near Ravenna to crest on Monday. They labeled it as a “historical flood.” According to emergency management, the projected crest was set at 36.9 feet, less than 3 feet higher than the record high. The stage for major flooding in the county is 31 feet.

Here are some scenes across the state showing devastating floods. 

Johnson County Judicial Center in Paintsville has sustained flood damage. 

Mudslides and washed-out roads in Pike County. 

People in Lexington along the Kentucky River are traveling by boat to scoot around town. 

More devastation in Johnson County.

A Twitter user tweeted their area was wiped out by flooding.

Water rescue operations. 

Major flooding between Lexington and Jackson.

A small town is nearly submerged. 

“I gotta say, I have never seen the flooding this bad in this region!” said Twitter user Dahboo7.

Drone captures flooding along the Red River. 

Tyler Durden
Mon, 03/01/2021 – 17:39

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3sJdMcf Tyler Durden

Punish Politicians for the Right Reasons

Matt Welch, Katherine Mangu-Ward, Peter Suderman, and Nick Gillespie gather on this week’s Reason Roundtable to reflect with fresh fury on the latest bureaucratic bottle-necking and duty dereliction. And they find some bits of good news for you too.

Discussed in the show:

0:24: New York is…not well.

23:56: What’s the takeaway of comparing Democrat- and Republican-run states in the face of pandemic management? (Look forward to a feature piece diving even deeper into this by Matt Welch.)

31:23: Weekly Listener Question: What does the Roundtable suggest to replace the current vaccine approval process?

46:45: Biden bombed Syria, and we’re reminded that behind the “he’s not Trump” hype, he’s still just a “status-quo institutionalist.”

49:13: Media recommendations for the week.

This week’s links:

Send your questions either by email to roundtable@reason.com or by voicemail to 213-973-3017. Be sure to include your social media handle and the correct pronunciation of your name.

Audio production by Ian Keyser.
Assistant production by Regan Taylor.
Music: “Angeline,” by The Brothers Steve.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2OdPSXn
via IFTTT

U.N. Human Rights Officials Call For Investigation of Navalny Poisoning

dreamstime_xl_42309336

Two United Nations human rights officials pressed today for an international investigation into the August 2020 poisoning of Russian political dissident Alexei Navalny. Only state actors, they claim, could have carried out the attack.

Navalny fell into a coma while on a domestic flight in Russia last summer. He was medically evacuated to Germany, where a novel form of the nerve agent Novichok was found to be in his system. Novichok is a banned neurotoxin developed by the Soviet and then Russian governments.

Agnès Callamard, the U.N.’s special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary, or arbitrary executions, and Irene Khan, the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, released a statement today calling for a “credible and transparent” investigation into Navalny’s poisoning. They expressly accused the Russian government of culpability.

“We believe that poisoning Mr. Navalny with Novichok might have been deliberately carried out to send a clear, sinister warning that this would be the fate of anyone who would criticise and oppose the government,” the statement says. “Novichok was precisely chosen to cause fear.”

The officials claim that the use of the nerve agent and the attackers’ expertise in handling the dangerous substance point to the Kremlin’s complicity.

“Mr. Navalny was under intensive government surveillance at the time of the attempted killing, making it unlikely that any third party could have administered such a banned chemical without the knowledge of the Russian authorities,” they wrote in a December letter to the Russian government.

After spending several months recovering in Germany, Navalny was arrested upon his return to Russia for violating the terms of his parole for a 2014 fraud conviction. The arrest sparked weeks of protests throughout the country.

Despite Navalny’s argument that he had been taken to Germany while comatose, left the country as soon as he was medically able, and informed prison officials of his whereabouts, a judge still sentenced him to more than two and a half years in a penal colony.

Last week, Amnesty International revoked Navalny’s status as a prisoner of conscience because of past comments the organization claimed “amounted to advocacy of hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, violence or hostility.” (Navalny has used a derogatory term for ethnic Georgians, and he called for their expulsion from the country during Russia’s war with Georgia in 2008. Navalny has since apologized for the epithet but has stood by several nationalist positions he has taken.) Amnesty International’s definition of “prisoner of conscience” excludes those who have “advocated violence or hatred,” and it has concluded that Navalny no longer makes the cut.

Nonetheless, the group continues to support Navalny’s release. “There should be no confusion: nothing Navalny has said in the past justifies his current detention, which is purely politically motivated,” the organization declared in an official statement. “Navalny has been arbitrarily detained for exercising his right to freedom of expression, and for this reason we continue to campaign for his immediate release.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3q0kpoI
via IFTTT

Punish Politicians for the Right Reasons

Matt Welch, Katherine Mangu-Ward, Peter Suderman, and Nick Gillespie gather on this week’s Reason Roundtable to reflect with fresh fury on the latest bureaucratic bottle-necking and duty dereliction. And they find some bits of good news for you too.

Discussed in the show:

0:24: New York is…not well.

23:56: What’s the takeaway of comparing Democrat- and Republican-run states in the face of pandemic management? (Look forward to a feature piece diving even deeper into this by Matt Welch.)

31:23: Weekly Listener Question: What does the Roundtable suggest to replace the current vaccine approval process?

46:45: Biden bombed Syria, and we’re reminded that behind the “he’s not Trump” hype, he’s still just a “status-quo institutionalist.”

49:13: Media recommendations for the week.

This week’s links:

Send your questions either by email to roundtable@reason.com or by voicemail to 213-973-3017. Be sure to include your social media handle and the correct pronunciation of your name.

Audio production by Ian Keyser.
Assistant production by Regan Taylor.
Music: “Angeline,” by The Brothers Steve.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2OdPSXn
via IFTTT

U.N. Human Rights Officials Call For Investigation of Navalny Poisoning

dreamstime_xl_42309336

Two United Nations human rights officials pressed today for an international investigation into the August 2020 poisoning of Russian political dissident Alexei Navalny. Only state actors, they claim, could have carried out the attack.

Navalny fell into a coma while on a domestic flight in Russia last summer. He was medically evacuated to Germany, where a novel form of the nerve agent Novichok was found to be in his system. Novichok is a banned neurotoxin developed by the Soviet and then Russian governments.

Agnès Callamard, the U.N.’s special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary, or arbitrary executions, and Irene Khan, the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, released a statement today calling for a “credible and transparent” investigation into Navalny’s poisoning. They expressly accused the Russian government of culpability.

“We believe that poisoning Mr. Navalny with Novichok might have been deliberately carried out to send a clear, sinister warning that this would be the fate of anyone who would criticise and oppose the government,” the statement says. “Novichok was precisely chosen to cause fear.”

The officials claim that the use of the nerve agent and the attackers’ expertise in handling the dangerous substance point to the Kremlin’s complicity.

“Mr. Navalny was under intensive government surveillance at the time of the attempted killing, making it unlikely that any third party could have administered such a banned chemical without the knowledge of the Russian authorities,” they wrote in a December letter to the Russian government.

After spending several months recovering in Germany, Navalny was arrested upon his return to Russia for violating the terms of his parole for a 2014 fraud conviction. The arrest sparked weeks of protests throughout the country.

Despite Navalny’s argument that he had been taken to Germany while comatose, left the country as soon as he was medically able, and informed prison officials of his whereabouts, a judge still sentenced him to more than two and a half years in a penal colony.

Last week, Amnesty International revoked Navalny’s status as a prisoner of conscience because of past comments the organization claimed “amounted to advocacy of hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, violence or hostility.” (Navalny has used a derogatory term for ethnic Georgians, and he called for their expulsion from the country during Russia’s war with Georgia in 2008. Navalny has since apologized for the epithet but has stood by several nationalist positions he has taken.) Amnesty International’s definition of “prisoner of conscience” excludes those who have “advocated violence or hatred,” and it has concluded that Navalny no longer makes the cut.

Nonetheless, the group continues to support Navalny’s release. “There should be no confusion: nothing Navalny has said in the past justifies his current detention, which is purely politically motivated,” the organization declared in an official statement. “Navalny has been arbitrarily detained for exercising his right to freedom of expression, and for this reason we continue to campaign for his immediate release.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3q0kpoI
via IFTTT

What “Normal” Are We Returning To? The Depression Nobody Dares Acknowledge

What “Normal” Are We Returning To? The Depression Nobody Dares Acknowledge

Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

Perhaps we need an honest national dialog about declining expectations, rising inequality, social depression and the failure of the status quo.

Even as the chirpy happy-talk of a return to normal floods the airwaves, what nobody dares acknowledge is that “normal” for a rising number of Americans is the social depression of downward mobility and social defeat.

Downward mobility is not a new trend–it’s simply accelerating. As this RAND Corporation report documents, ( Trends in Income From 1975 to 2018) $50 trillion in earnings has been transferred to the Financial Aristocracy from the bottom 90% of American households over the past 45 years.

Time magazine’s article on the report is remarkably direct: The Top 1% of Americans Have Taken $50 Trillion From the Bottom 90% — And That’s Made the U.S. Less Secure.

“The $50 trillion transfer of wealth the RAND report documents has occurred entirely within the American economy, not between it and its trading partners. No, this upward redistribution of income, wealth, and power wasn’t inevitable; it was a choice–a direct result of the trickle-down policies we chose to implement since 1975.

We chose to cut taxes on billionaires and to deregulate the financial industry. We chose to allow CEOs to manipulate share prices through stock buybacks, and to lavishly reward themselves with the proceeds. We chose to permit giant corporations, through mergers and acquisitions, to accumulate the vast monopoly power necessary to dictate both prices charged and wages paid. We chose to erode the minimum wage and the overtime threshold and the bargaining power of labor. For four decades, we chose to elect political leaders who put the material interests of the rich and powerful above those of the American people.”

I’ve been digging into downward mobility and social depression for years: Are You Really Middle Class?

The reality is that the middle class has been reduced to the sliver just below the top 5%–if we use the standards of the prosperous 1960s as a baseline.

The downward mobility isn’t just financial–it’s a decline in political power, control of one’s work and ownership of income-producing assets. This article reminds us of what the middle class once represented: What Middle Class? How bourgeois America is getting recast as a proletariat.

This reappraisal of the American Dream is also triggering a reappraisal of the middle class in the decades of widespread prosperity: The Myth of the Middle Class: Have Most Americans Always Been Poor?

Downward mobility excels in creating and distributing what I term social defeat: In my lexicon, social defeat is the spectrum of anxiety, insecurity, chronic stress, fear and powerlessness that accompanies declining financial security and social status.

Downward mobility and social defeat lead to social depression. Here are the conditions that characterize social depression:

1. High expectations of endlessly rising prosperity instilled as a birthright no longer align with economy reality.

2. Part-time and unemployed people are marginalized, not just financially but socially.

3. Widening income/wealth disparity as those in the top 10% pull away from the bottom 90%.

4. A systemic decline in social/economic mobility as it becomes increasingly difficult to move from dependence on the state or one’s parents to financial independence.

5. A widening disconnect between higher education and employment: a college/university degree no longer guarantees a stable, good-paying job.

6. A failure in the Status Quo institutions and mainstream media to recognize social depression as a reality.

7. A systemic failure of imagination within state and private-sector institutions on how to address social depression issues.

8. The abandonment of middle class aspirations: young people no longer aspire to (or cannot afford) consumerist status symbols such as luxury autos or conventional homeownership.

9. A generational abandonment of marriage, families and independent households as these are no longer affordable to those with part-time or unstable employment.

10. A loss of hope in the young generations as a result of the above conditions.

The rising tide of collective anger arising from social depression is visible in many places: road rage, violent street clashes between groups seething for a fight, the destruction of friendships for holding “incorrect” ideological views, and so on.

A coarsening of the entire social order is increasingly visible: The Age of Rudeness.

Depressive thoughts (and the emotions they generate) tend to be self-reinforcing, and this is why it’s so difficult to break out of depression once in its grip.

One part of the healing process is to expose the sources of anger that we are repressing. As psychiatrist Karen Horney explained in her 1950 masterwork, Neurosis and Human Growth: The Struggle Towards Self-Realization, anger at ourselves sometimes arises from our failure to live up to the many “shoulds” we’ve internalized, and the idealized track we’ve laid out for ourselves and our lives.

The article The American Dream Is Killing Us does a good job of explaining how our failure to obtain the expected rewards of “doing all the right things” (getting a college degree, working hard, etc.) breeds resentment and despair.

Since we did the “right things,” the system “should” deliver the financial rewards and security we expected. This systemic failure to deliver the promised rewards is eroding the social contract and social cohesion. Fewer and fewer people have a stake in the system.

We are increasingly angry at the system, but we reserve some anger for ourselves, because the mass-media trumpets how well the economy is doing and how some people are doing extremely well. Naturally, we wonder, why them and not us? The failure is thus internalized.

One response to this sense that the system no longer works as advertised is to seek the relative comfort of echo chambers–places we can go to hear confirmation that this systemic stagnation is the opposing ideological camp’s fault.

Part of the American Exceptionalism we hear so much about is a can-do optimism: set your mind to it and everything is possible.

The failure to prosper as anticipated is generating a range of negative emotions that are “un-American”: complaining that you didn’t get a high-paying secure job despite having a college degree (or advanced degree) sounds like sour-grapes: the message is you didn’t work hard enough, you didn’t get the right diploma, etc.

It can’t be the system that’s failed, right? I discuss this in my book Why Our Status Quo Failed and Is Beyond Reform: the top 10% who are benefiting mightily dominate politics and the media, and their assumption is: the system is working great for me, so it must be working great for everyone. This implicit narrative carries an implicit accusation that any failure is the fault of the individual, not the system.

The inability to express our despair and anger generates depression. Some people will redouble their efforts, others will seek to lay the blame on “the other” (some external group) and others will give up. What few people will do is look at the sources of systemic injustice and inequality.

Perhaps we need an honest national dialog about declining expectations, rising inequality and the failure of the status quo that avoids polarization and the internalization trap (i.e. it’s your own fault you’re not well-off).

We need to value honesty above fake happy-talk. Once we can speak honestly, there will be a foundation for optimism.

*  *  *

If you found value in this content, please join me in seeking solutions by becoming a $1/month patron of my work via patreon.com.

*  *  *

My recent books:

A Hacker’s Teleology: Sharing the Wealth of Our Shrinking Planet (Kindle $8.95, print $20, audiobook $17.46) Read the first section for free (PDF).

Will You Be Richer or Poorer?: Profit, Power, and AI in a Traumatized World (Kindle $5, print $10, audiobook) Read the first section for free (PDF).

Pathfinding our Destiny: Preventing the Final Fall of Our Democratic Republic ($5 (Kindle), $10 (print), ( audiobook): Read the first section for free (PDF).

The Adventures of the Consulting Philosopher: The Disappearance of Drake $1.29 (Kindle), $8.95 (print); read the first chapters for free (PDF)

Money and Work Unchained $6.95 (Kindle), $15 (print) Read the first section for free (PDF).

Tyler Durden
Mon, 03/01/2021 – 17:21

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3uJYoxV Tyler Durden

Texas AG Hits Electricity Provider Griddy For ‘Deceptive Practices’

Texas AG Hits Electricity Provider Griddy For ‘Deceptive Practices’

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit against power company Griddy, LLC for “violating the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act through false, misleading, and deceptive advertising and marketing practices,” according to a statement released by Paxton’s office.

“Griddy passed skyrocketing energy costs to customers with little to no warning, resulting in consumers paying hundreds or even thousands of dollars each day for electricity,” the statement said. 

“Griddy misled Texans and signed them up for services which, in a time of crisis, resulted in individual Texans each losing thousands of dollars. As Texans struggled to survive this winter storm, Griddy made the suffering even worse as it debited outrageous amounts each day. As the first lawsuit filed by my office to confront the outrageous failure of power companies, I will hold Griddy accountable for their escalation of this winter storm disaster,” said Paxton. “My office will not allow Texans to be deceived or exploited by unlawful behavior and deceptive business practices.”

Here’s the lawsuit:

Griddy, which debuted in 2017, allowed people to opt into variable-rate electricity plans – essentially paying wholesale prices for electricity instead of a fixed rate. But when the February winter freeze and multiple storms resulted in power rates to skyorcket – some Texans were slapped with thousands of dollars in energy bills

The lawsuit seeks relief from Griddy to ensure that “the Texans it serves will receive truthful and accurate energy service in the future, and to have the Court order refunds from available sources,” the statement concluded. 

Paxton’s lawsuit was inevitable as we noted last week, variable-rate electricity plans would come under intense scrutiny

The good news is that most Texans don’t have variable plans, according to Catherine Webking, a partner at Austin-based law firm Scott Douglass & McConnico. 

Unfortunately, when energy demand is high, the wholesale price of power can be quite expensive. Certainly, scrutiny is building across multiple state governments about how some energy companies charge their customers. 

One Texas resident was slapped with a multi-thousand dollar power bill. She said:

“I’m not exactly sure what I’m supposed to do – should I take from my 401K? Should I get a loan?”

Maybe customers with variable-rate plans should get into the game of hedging? Or perhaps, for starters, at least keep an eye on power rates… 

Tyler Durden
Mon, 03/01/2021 – 17:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3b3PSSI Tyler Durden

Supreme Court Rejects Sidney Powell’s Lawsuits Challenging Election Results In Wisconsin, Arizona

Supreme Court Rejects Sidney Powell’s Lawsuits Challenging Election Results In Wisconsin, Arizona

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The Supreme Court on Monday formally rejected two of Sidney Powell’s lawsuits that challenged the results of the Nov. 3 election.

The Supreme Court didn’t offer any comment on dismissing the lawsuits on Monday. One lawsuit was filed in Wisconsin and the other in Arizona.

The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied,” the court said.

A submission directly to this Court seeking an extraordinary writ of mandamus is unusual, but it has its foundation. While such relief is rare, this Court will grant it ‘where a question of public importance is involved, or where the question is of such a nature that it is peculiarly appropriate that such action by this Court should be taken,’” one of Powell’s mandamus petitions said.

The Epoch Times has reached out to Powell for comment. Powell did not appear to have posted a comment about Supreme Court’s decision on her Telegram page on Monday.

A day before President Joe Biden’s inauguration on Jan. 20, Powell withdrew another lawsuit in the Supreme Court challenging Georgia’s election results.

And several weeks ago, Powell announced she launched a super PAC dedicated to freedom of speech, Constitutional rights, and “the sacred right of free and fair elections.”

Powell in late January said she created the Restore the Republic Super PAC, which is an independent expenditure-only political action committee that may receive unlimited contributions and may engage in unlimited political spending on initiatives, provided it does not coordinate directly with campaigns or candidates.

“The American people deserve a voice that exposes and rejects the self-interest of political parties, the control of tech giants, and the lies of the fake news,” she said.

Meanwhile, after the Jan. 6 Capitol breach, Twitter suspended the accounts belonging to a number of conservatives, including Powell. Powell, in a statement to The Epoch Times at the time, said there “was no warning at all” about her Twitter account being deleted, adding that “it is stunning.”

“Twitter’s actions and those of banks who shut down accounts of people who went to DC are fascism in its purest form … It is a communist coup that has been long and well-planned,” she said in an email in January.

Powell, who successfully defended retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, was introduced by the Trump legal team in November, although the team later distanced themselves from her and said she wasn’t working on their behalf.

Separately, Dominion Voting Systems filed a $1.3 billion lawsuit against Powell as well as similar lawsuits against Rudy Giuliani and Mike Lindell. Powell’s lawyer, Lin Wood, implied in statements last month that she did nothing wrong. “Sidney and I will not be intimidated,” Wood said, adding that he and Powell “will not go quietly into the night.”

Tom Ozimek contributed to this report.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 03/01/2021 – 16:41

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3kB6BA3 Tyler Durden

Zoom Rockets Higher After Smashing Expectations, Guides To Another Blowout Quarter

Zoom Rockets Higher After Smashing Expectations, Guides To Another Blowout Quarter

Zoom Video returned to its steamrolling ways, trading as if the pandemic will never end and people will work via Zoom call in perpetuity, when it reported Q4 earnings that smashed expectations, and projected Q1 revenue and EPS that blew away analyst estimates.

The company reported Q4 EPS of $1.22, almost 10x higher compared to a year ago, and more than 50% higher the consensus estimate of $0.79 on revenues of $882 million, up 369% Y/Y, and also well above analyst estimates of $812MM.

Zoom also reported:

  • Cost of revenue $267.3 million, estimate $259.5 million
  • Gross margin up to 69.7% from 66.7% in the prior quarter
  • FCF of $377.9 million, beating estimates of $202.2 million
  • Cash and cash equivalents $2.24 billion, nearly 10x higher than the $283.1MM a year ago, and more than double the consensus estimate of $1.05 billion

Zoom said it had 467,100 customers with over 10 employees at the end of the fiscal fourth quarter, up 470% on an annualized basis, compared with 354% growth in the previous quarter. During Q4, Zoom said it had accumulated more than 1 million seats paying for Zoom Phone, a service that allows people to virtually make and receive phone calls, route calls and accept voicemail.

The company’s guidance was even more impressive: ZM now expects Q1 revenue between $900.0MM and $905.0MM, blowing out sellside estimates of $829.5 million, if not quite above the high end of the $727.0 million to $948.0 million range. The company also expects adjusted EPS 95c to 97c, versus an estimate of 72c, and this time coming well above the higher end of the analyst range of 49c to 93c.

For the full year 2022, total revenue is expected to be between $3.760 billion and $3.780 billion and non-GAAP income from operations is expected to be between $1.125 billion and $1.145 billion.

Commenting on the results, Eric S. Yuan, Founder and CEO, said “as we enter FY2022, we believe we are well positioned for strong growth with our innovative video communications platform.”

The company, which has 11 buys, 15 holds, 3 sells (ratings which will be revised sharply higher tonight), initially dipped on what appeared to be another priced to perfection report, only to rip higher, and was last seen trading more than 10% higher than the Monday’s closing price of $409.66, which had brought the YTD move to +22%, and was trading most recently at $450.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 03/01/2021 – 16:38

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2Pg1IAA Tyler Durden