Goldman Sachs, the 3rd Bank Spewing Fear, Loathing & Hatred At Bitcoin: The Paradigm Shift That Makes Bankers Quake

thumb Slide7http://ift.tt/18FYeW3); background-color: transparent; vertical-align: baseline; display: block; width: 503.9772644042969px; height: 284.8863525390625px; position: absolute; z-index: 1; bottom: 0px; left: 0px; background-position: 100% 100%; background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat;">thumb Slide7

Let's quote some of the last lines of my last article on Bitcoin: "Witness the drivel that comes out of the the analyst's reports (and yes, I thoroughly ridiculed each one):

  1. Theres' Something Fishy In The House Of Morgan, Pt. 2: Bitcoin Fear, Envy & Loathing
  2. Does the Mainstream Media Assist Wall Street In Hypocritical Hypothesis For Fear Of The Next Paradigm Shift?"

You see, first JP Morgan threw baseless fear tactics, then Citibank jumped into the fray. Well, guess whose next? Goldman Sachs, of course. Everybody's favorite fair game player. As excerpted from Business Insider today:

"Dominic Wilson and Jose Ursua of the firm's markets research division are first up. They argue that Bitcoin fails to meet both basic criteria of a viable currency: while there remains an outside chance for widespread acceptance as a medium of exchange, as a stable source of value, it has so far failed. That undermines the premise that Bitcoin could serve as a way of short-circuiting exchange rates in inflation-prone countries."

 And Reggie, Chief of Bullshit Patrol & Related Crimes Division chimes in with a Google search on promintent "failed" currency processors:

Bitpay user growth google searchhttp://ift.tt/18FYeW3); background-color: transparent; vertical-align: baseline; display: block; width: 322.96875px; height: 403.9772644042969px; position: absolute; z-index: 1; bottom: 0px; left: 0px; background-position: 100% 100%; background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat;">Bitpay user growth google searchcoinbase user growth google searchhttp://ift.tt/18FYeW3); background-color: transparent; vertical-align: baseline; display: block; width: 377.96875px; height: 403.9772644042969px; position: absolute; z-index: 1; bottom: 0px; left: 0px; background-position: 100% 100%; background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat;">coinbase user growth google search

But wait a minute! Goldman's business business is growing at a fraction of this pace, and actually negative in some areas. So, if Bitcoin as a currency and payment system is a failure, what the hell is Goldmam? Of course, Business Insider goes on to report…

For most users what matters is not the comparison with other currencies, but a comparison with the volatility of the currency that they hold (dollars in the US for instance) in terms of the things that they need to buy. The volatility of consumer prices (in dollars) has been even lower than FX rates, even if measured over a period including the 1970s. Put simply, if you hold cash today in most developed countries, you know within a few percentage points what you will be able to buy with it a day, a week or a year from now.  

This is Bullshit! Say it to the more mathematically challenged, my bonus hungry friends. Let's run the math using theusinflationcalculator.com:

Dollar as a store of valuehttp://ift.tt/18FYeW3); background-color: transparent; vertical-align: baseline; display: block; width: 321.97442626953125px; height: 403.9772644042969px; position: absolute; z-index: 1; bottom: 0px; left: 0px; background-position: 100% 100%; background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat;">Dollar as a store of value

As you can see, if you measure things from the '70s as the esteemed, erstwhile Wall Street aficiaondo from Goldman recommended, then you would have less than 17% of your buying power left. Yes, bitcoin is volatile, but its volatility stems from the price going up and down, while the USD has primarily just went down. You know that saying about the frog in the slowly heated boiling pot of water, right?

In addition, both of the largest Bitcoin payment processors absorb the exchange rate volatility for their customers, or did the best of breed Goldman analysts somehow overlook this pertinent fact?

 

Eliminate the bitcoin volatility risk with BitPay's guaranteed exchange rates. … Import your BitPay sales into QuickBooks, to report and reconcile your bitcoin  …

 

In addition, there are cutting edge products being introduced by tall, handsome, charsimatic and highly intelligent entrepeneurs who have a long track record of out gunning Goldman et. al. that allow anyone to hedge Bitcoin volatlity against any prominent fiat currency.

Back to those Goldman guys…

Wilson and Ursua include this graph showing volatility of Bitcoin versus the Argentine peso, the yen, the euro, the pound, and U.S. inflation. It's not even close. 

bitcoin volaitlityhttp://ift.tt/18FYeW3); background-color: transparent; vertical-align: baseline; display: block; width: 503.9772644042969px; height: 291.25px; position: absolute; z-index: 1; bottom: 0px; left: 0px; background-position: 100% 100%; background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat;">bitcoin volaitlity

But wait a minute! If the largest payment processors absorb the volatility and market risk of their customers, then Goldman must assuredly be referring to the currencies above from an investment perspective, no?

Yes! Bitcoin is truly volatile, indeed, but the guy at Goldman are cheating, hoping that the rest of us don't know our finance and/or basic common sense. You see, they are looking at just one side of the equation – the side that favors fiat currencies and disfavors bitcoin. You see, risk is the price of reward. For every reward you seek, you pay a price in risk. The goal, as a smart investor, is to pay little risk for much reward. Goldman is trying to make it appear as if you are paying nothing but risk for bitcoin and getting little reward in return. Let's see how that pans out when someone who knows what they're doing chimes in. From the BoomBustBlogresearch report File Icon Digital Currencies' Risks, Rewards & Returns – An Into Into Bitcoin Investing For Longer Term Horizons:

Bitcoin risk adjusted returnshttp://ift.tt/18FYeW3); background-color: transparent; vertical-align: baseline; display: block; width: 279.9715881347656px; height: 403.9772644042969px; position: absolute; z-index: 1; bottom: 0px; left: 0px; background-position: 100% 100%; background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat;">Bitcoin risk adjusted returns

You see, with high volatility (aka, risk), it's hard to earn your cost of capital, not to menton surpass it. Isn't that right, employess of Goldman Sachs? Let me jog your collective memories, as excerpted from the BoomBustBlog post on When the Patina Fades… The Rise and Fall of Goldman Sachs???

GS return on equity has declined substantially due to deleverage and is only marginally higher than its current cost of capital. With ROE down to c12% from c20% during pre-crisis levels, there is no way a stock with high beta as GS could justify adequate returns to cover the inherent risk. For GS to trade back at 200 it has to increase its leverage back to pre-crisis levels to assume ROE of 20%. And for that GS has to either increase its leverage back to 25x. With curbs on banks leverage this seems highly unlikely. Without any increase in leverage and ROE, the stock would only marginally cover returns to shareholders given that ROE is c12%. Even based on consensus estimates the stock should trade at about where it is trading right now, leaving no upside potential. Using BoomBustBlog estimates, the valuation drops considerably since we take into consideration a decrease in trading revenue or an increase in the cost of funding in combination with a limitation of leverage due to the impending global regulation coming down the pike.

gs_roe.jpghttp://ift.tt/18FYeW3); background-color: transparent; vertical-align: baseline; display: block; width: 503.9772644042969px; height: 353.9772644042969px; position: absolute; z-index: 1; bottom: 0px; left: 0px; background-position: 100% 100%; background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat;">gs_roe.jpg

 

 Now that we see how hard it is to truly produce Alpha, I query thee… What do you think would happen if a financial maverick, an out of the box thinker who's different from all of those other guys, got a seed round of funding for the most disruptive product to hit the finance world since the printing press? What if that seed round was for $8 million dollars, with a preferred A series coming right behind it? What would such a cash flush company do, being one of the most cash flush Bitcoin companies in the world? Hmmmnnn!!!

Speakin' of Goldman Sachs…

I anticipate being in the market very soon for (I'm not thier yet, but hopefully very soon):

CTO – Chief Technology Officer

COO – Chief Opertating Officer

General Counsel

CMO – Chief Marketing Officer 

CFO – Chief Financial Officer

As well as skilled Java and Blockchain developers.

Hit me via reggie at ultra-coin.com if you have an interest in coming on board.


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1cUXbKn Reggie Middleton

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *