CT School District Apologizes For Blocking Conservative Websites

On the website of Connecticut’s Regional
School District 14 is a commendable, but somewhat out-of-context,

commitment to relative Internet freedom for public school
students, dated June 20.

Regional School District 14 takes the position that while it is
obviously critical to block specific categories of websites as
required by law (e.g., pornography, etc.), the blocking of
otherwise appropriate websites, regardless of political or
religious viewpoints, is WRONG.

The statement goes on to note that “On Region 14’s computers,
some websites were blocked, while others were not,” and it was all
a big technical error.

A letter dated the previous day gives us a little of the

awkward background in this story.

In recent weeks, a student conducting research on the district’s
network came upon a pattern of information access through the
district’s content filtering service…

the district has pressed Dell SonicWall for more information
about how websites are assigned to categories and why there are
apparent inconsistencies, as discovered by the student, in
classifications particularly along conservative and liberal lines.
Many of the liberal sites accessible to the student fell into the
“not rated” category, which was unblocked while many of the
conservative sites were in the “political/advocacy group” which is
accessible to teachers but not to students. The district is trying
to determine the reason for the inconsistency and if the bias is
pervasive enough to justify switching to another content filtering
provider.

Uh huh. As it turns out, high school student Andrew Lampart was
assigned to do a report on gun control, and quickly discovered that
the school Internet connection allowed him access to only one side
of the debate. Then he found that the school permitted access to
only one side of many debates—permitting access to gun
control groups and liberal organizations, but not their
counterparts. Whoops.

On Facebook, he wrote:

Earlier in the semester, our law class was promised to hold a
debate closer to the end of the year on the issue of gun control.
To prepare, I decided to do some research and gather resources
during study hall. However, I immediately found it difficult to
find resources that were opposed to stricter gun-control as most of
these websites were blocked by the firewall. Most of these websites
were blocked under the category of “Political/Advocacy Groups.” Out
of curiousity, I decided to perform a brief investigation and
search to see what other websites were blocked under this listing.
What I discovered was appalling.

As you can see from the list that I have provided you, the
firewall at the high school offers a very biased viewpoint towards
not only the issue of gun-control, but also abortion, religion, and
political parties. Even in this crucial election year for not only
the state of Connecticut, but the entire nation, the firewall has
selectively blocked candidate websites.

Bias in public schol classrooms is nothing new, but this was
especially blatant. And Lampart wasn’t prepared to let it rest. His
Facebook complaint quickly caught
media attention. And that explains Connecticut’s Regional
School District 14’s new, publicly proclaimed devotion to Internet
freedom.

Lampart’s list of blocked and unblocked sites is below.

–Blocked–
-National Right To Life
-ctmirror.org
-debate.org
-Second Amendment Foundation
-National Rifle Association
-Paul Ryan for Congress
-liberallogic101.com
-The Black Sphere
–rightwingnewscom
-ctfamily.org
rightwingwatch.org
redstate.com
townhall.com
sarahpac.com
teaparty.org
National Right To Life Foundation
Protectmarriage.com
vatican.va
christianity.com
nationalgunrights.org
ctgop.org
liberallogic101.com

-Unblocked-
ctdems.org
newtownactionalliance.org
momsdemandaxtion.org
islam-guide.com
lgbtqnation.com
plannedparenthod.org
prochoiceamerica.org
americanprogress.org
conservativelogic101.com
wsws.org
hillaryclintonoffice.com
danmalloy2014.com
nationalgrassrootscoalition.org
banhandgunsnow.org