Zoom Is Keeping Pandemic-Stricken America Connected. Cue Congress’s Tech Panic.

Videoconferencing technology has been helping to keep people connected, employed, and semi-sane in these unprecedented times. Zoom has emerged as a crowd favorite since the COVID-19 pandemic’s start, quickly gaining ground on old-school competitors like Skype, Google Hangouts, and Apple’s FaceTime.

So, of course, tech-panicky politicians want to interfere. This time, the theatrics are coming courtesy of congressional Democrats and state attorneys general—two groups skilled at taking social ills and science problems and turning them into self-promotional opportunities.

“Virtual conferencing platform Zoom is facing the prospect of mounting legal threats in Washington after a slew of prominent Democratic lawmakers urged federal regulators Tuesday to investigate its privacy and security lapses,” reports Politico‘s Cristiano Lima.

Those calling for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate Zoom include Democratic Sens. Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), Michael Bennet (Colo.), Sherrod Brown (Ohio), Richard Blumenthal (Conn.), Frank Pallone (N.J.), and Jan Schakowsky (Ill.).

In statements to Politico, spokespeople for Bennet and Klobuchar expressed vague concerns about Zoom user “privacy and security.” Brown put his thoughts in a letter last week.

Stories about lax data privacy practices, leaked videos, and hacked meetings have made the news recently, and these are certainly worth keeping a media and privacy watchdog spotlight on. But the political impulse we’re witnessing—broadly accuse first, find evidence later (maybe)—is a dangerous one.

In Washington, independent and supposedly neutral investigations by federal regulators have a way of turning into congressional witch hunts when bureaucrats bring back results legislators don’t like.

An FTC spokesperson told Politico the agency shares “concerns about the need to ensure the privacy and security of videoconferencing systems in light of their central importance during this crisis” but could not comment on specifics with regard to Zoom.

Attorneys general in Connecticut, Florida, and New York are also part of a group effort seeking information and company data from Zoom.

For its part, Zoom notes that it “was built primarily for enterprise customers—large institutions with full IT support,” and that “usage of Zoom has ballooned overnight,” from a maximum of 10 million daily meeting participants in December 2019 to more than 200 million per day in March. In the shift, “we recognize that we have fallen short of the community’s—and our own—privacy and security expectations,” wrote CEO Eric S. Yuan in a post laying out steps the company is taking to fix that.

Certainly, government officials and anyone conducting sensitive business should avoid free Zoom calls and other insecure communications platforms (which includes, of course, Skype, FaceTime, Google Hangouts, and their ilk, too). And if Zoom proves incapable of keeping its promises to do better, consumers can, should, and will move on.

But scaring up too much fear about Zoom privacy issues at the moment is silly. Those of us using the service for cross-country family hangouts, idle chats with old friends, exercise classes, virtual happy hours, and other mundane purposes face little significant threat, and certainly no more than we do on other mass-use social media and communications services.

The bottom line: Calls to investigate Zoom right now are being driven by a need for politicians to seem like they’re “doing something” (anything) in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. But while officials are right to be wary of using Zoom for government business, they’re probably just being melodramatic busybodies about the rest.

See Also: Eugene Volokh on “Zoombombing and the Law.”

FOLLOWUP

A federal court has upheld Texas’ temporary ban on surgical abortion:

FREE MINDS

Eight in 10 Americans support stay-at-home orders. From a HuffPost/YouGov survey conducted last weekend:

An 81% majority of the public says it’s currently the right decision for states to tell residents to stay at home unless they have an essential reason for going out. Just 8% say it’s the wrong decision. An even broader 89% say they are personally trying to stay home as much as possible, with only 6% saying they’re not making any such effort.

More here.

FREE MARKETS

Doctors, not politicians, should decide whether hydroxychloroquine is appropriate for COVID-19 patients, writes Jeffrey A. Singer, who has been a practicing clinical physician for more than 35 years. Adds Singer:

What I’ve seen about hydroxychloroquine makes me cautiously optimistic. Doctors should not be prohibited from using their best clinical judgment and recommending it to patients—especially considering the fact that these drugs have been around for a long time, which means we are familiar with their risks and complications. The government should stay out of this and let clinicians practice medicine, provided they get their patients’ informed consent. Patients have a fundamental right to try drugs they think may save their lives. Doctors they consult must be free to give patients their best advice, unencumbered by government overseers.

Read the whole thing here.

QUICK HITS

  • In New York, “the state budget that leaders are now finalizing would allow judges to ban individuals convicted of some sex crimes in mass transit from using the system for up to three years,” Politico reports.
  • An update from Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.), who was diagnosed with COVID-19 last month:

  • Hillbilly Elegy author J.D. Vance tackles common-on-the-right coronavirus myths here:

  • LOL/sigh:

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2Xg3uDX
via IFTTT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *