Pentagon Confirms US Warship, Commercial Ships Under Attack In Red Sea

Pentagon Confirms US Warship, Commercial Ships Under Attack In Red Sea

In a significant development, AP News has reported that a US Arleigh Burke-class destroyer and two commercial vessels were targeted in the Red Sea. This incident is part of a growing trend of maritime attacks in the waters of the Middle East, which have been linked to the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas. 

“We’re aware of reports regarding attacks on the USS Carney and commercial vessels in the Red Sea and will provide information as it becomes available,” the Pentagon said.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, a US official told AP that the attack was around Sanaa, Yemen, and said Carney, an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, repelled at least one drone during the attack.

Despite no confirmation from the Pentagon on who exactly were the attackers, one might suspect Yemen’s Iran-supported Houthi rebels, who have frequently attacked ships in the Red Sea, could be responsible. The terror group has also launched drones and missiles at Israel. 

Let’s remember the Red Sea is one of the world’s most heavily traveled commercial shipping lanes. 

Meanwhile, “Gulf of Tonkin” is trending on X in the US. 

The latest data from intelligence firm Stratfor shows two US aircraft carriers are in the region:

  • CVN 69: The USS Dwight D. Eisenhower is underway in the Persian Gulf. 
  • CVN 78: The USS Gerald R. Ford is underway in the Mediterranean Sea. 

With an amphibious group in the Red Sea

  • LHD 5: The USS Bataan is underway.

This comes weeks after the “Galaxy Leader,” a vehicle carrier vessel, was hijacked in the Red Sea

*Developing… 

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/03/2023 – 12:37

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3iFteX0 Tyler Durden

NATO Chief: West Should Brace For More ‘Bad News’ From Ukraine

NATO Chief: West Should Brace For More ‘Bad News’ From Ukraine

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg in a fresh interview warned the Western alliance to brace for more “bad news” from Ukraine, according to Saturday remarks given to Germany’s national ARD television.

He was asked whether he thinks the situation will worsen for Ukrainian forces in the future, after the counteroffensive has been widely acknowledged as a failure. “We should also be prepared for bad news,” he responded. “Wars develop in phases. But we have to support Ukraine in both good and bad times.”

He said that in response to the current “critical situation” the West must boost ammunition production. “I will leave it to the Ukrainians and military commanders to make these difficult operational decisions,” Stoltenberg explained.

“One of the issues we should address is the fragmentation of the European defense industry,” he said. Countries have gone from being enthusiastic supporters and donors of Ukraine’s cause to more lately sounding the alarm over dwindling or tapped defense stockpiles, as ammo production also can’t keep up. 

AFP/Getty Images

A week ago, a German official raised eyebrows by speculating that if Germany was forced to enter a major war its troops would only last “two days in battle” due to severe shortages of defense supplied and ammunition as a result of giving them to Ukraine. Below are the German politician’s words, according to a translation

The combat capacity of the German Armed Forces, the Bundeswehr, has been seriously weakened by the shortage caused by the continuous supplies of material and ammunition to Kiev, said Johann Wadephul, German deputy of the opposition Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party. His comments come as it was discovered nearly half of Germans want to see the coalition government dissolved.

“Crucial [German] troop units can only last a maximum of two days in a battle [due to these shortages]. And that is a catastrophic finding overall,” Wadephul said. “Anyone who even talks about being ready for war, but expects the Bundeswehr to be at least ready to defend itself, should have ensured that such a bad situation does not occur. Unfortunately, the opposite is the case.”

Wadephul argued that the process of improving the combat capacity of the country’s armed forces was slow and blamed the German defence minister, Boris Pistorius, for the current state of things. He added that he sees high-sounding statements but little real action to change the current situation.

According to the politician, “the turning point” for the Bundeswehr has not yet arrived. 

“Even when it comes to replacement procurement, the Bundeswehr is actually making a loss. As correct as the donations to Ukraine are in terms of material and ammunition, in the current security situation, it is unacceptable that there is no compensation,” Wadephul said. “We need much more [weapons] than we have had.”

All of this is also part of the ‘war fatigue’ echoed in media headlines. Still, Stoltenberg and the Biden White House are pressing European leaders to double and triple down. Stoltenberg also recently tried to swat down assertions that fatigue has finally set in even among NATO leadership.

And in his latest interview, the NATO chief emphasized that “Wars are inherently unpredictable” – but that “we know that the more we support Ukraine, the faster the war will end.” Yet this strategy hasn’t worked out so far.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/03/2023 – 12:15

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/xMJpEDQ Tyler Durden

Elon Musk Vs. Dark Forces

Elon Musk Vs. Dark Forces

Submitted by QTR’s Fringe Finance

Both Elon Musk and Tesla are entering an era that I think is going to define their respective legacies. Today I wanted to explain what I support about Mr. Musk, what I don’t support, where my questions about him and Tesla lie and why I think 2024 will be the year that determines his life story.

By now, everybody has seen Musk’s appearance at the New York Times DealBook conference yesterday, where he proudly told advertisers who were boycotting X to go f*ck themselves.

It’s obvious to me that Musk is making a carefully placed bet that the support he will get from figures on the right, and the anti-censorship crowd, will offset the scrutiny and boycotts from his critical crowd on the left — advertisers, social justice warriors and regulators working for the Biden administration.

In other words, Musk has likely seen the pushback on brands like Bud Light and Target and believes that the environment is ripe to take a stand against woke culture.

The real question is whether or not this ideological war that Musk is fighting against censorship and the left is something he’s coming by honestly.

To the best of my recollection, this inverse version of Musk was born sometime during the COVID pandemic, when Musk became upset that his Fremont factory was going to have to shut down for pandemic restrictions at a critical time for Tesla’s public performance metrics.

Remember, Musk said on an early 2020 conference call that the lockdown was an “outrage” and that it was “forcibly imprisoning people in their homes against all of their constitutional rights,” which is “not why people came to America and built this country.”

While it turns out he was right, the question is why he was freaking out to begin with: real ideological difference of opinion, or because it was “put up or shut up” time for Tesla stock publicly, and it would be hard to hit the numbers with Fremont shut down.

It was after this incident – and as government scrutiny of Musk and Autopilot increased – that Musk appeared to start down the path of supporting conservative causes. In the months that followed, he moved Tesla’s headquarters from California to Texas and in the years that followed, he has become one of the most prominent anti-censorship voices in American culture.

It’s funny because this conservative-leaning attitude seems to stand at stark odds with Musk’s initial reasons for starting Tesla, namely, to create affordable mass market electric vehicles that would help fight climate change. At the beginning of the company’s history, Tesla was buoyed by the support of the same global warming obsessed lunatics and woke ideologues that Musk is now spending his days fighting against.

While there’s an argument that Musk may have simply just had enough of government regulation, there’s also an argument that Musk is making a strategic power grab for support from the right wing when he might need it most.

As of now, Musk, X, and Tesla are under investigation by no less than three government agencies, including the Department of Justice. The question is whether or not those agencies are targeting Musk as retaliation for his anti-left-wing government stances, or if Musk has strengthened his anti-left-wing stances to try to prepare for whatever the fallout will be from these investigations, led by a left-wing administration.

Regardless of whether or not his intentions are pure, I will give him credit for being a largely followed figurehead that is (perhaps for the wrong reasons) furthering discourse about stopping the woke mind virus and protecting our First Amendment rights. Whether his actual intentions are ever to be revealed is another story. I take his actions at face value for the time being even though, to use the parlance of Edward R. Rooney, Dean of Students, I don’t “trust this kid any further than I can throw him.”

And so, it’s up to investors to decide whether or not Musk’s outburst at the DealBook conference yesterday was the chicken – pandering to the right because he’s going to need their support as X’s advertising revenue collapses, or the egg – a true disdain for the “woke” and a genuine “GFY” attitude.


💥 50% OFF FOR LIFE: For those that aren’t paid subscribers yet, you can take 50% off an annual plan, for life: Get 50% off forever


What I do know is that time is running out before Musk personally, and possibly both X and Tesla, hit inflection points.

Musk has already come out and admitted that the launch of the Cybertruck is going to be extremely difficult and so it’s my guess that this week’s launch of the new vehicle is mostly going to be an exercise in hot air, marketing and gimmicks instead of actual production (see also: roof tiles, solar).

I don’t believe that Tesla is going to get a meaningful amount of Cybertrucks produced or delivered anytime soon, and I also don’t believe that the build quality or the appeal of the vehicle is going entice people to buy it or create demand that lasts for any prolonged amount of time. In other words, I don’t believe the Cybertruck is going to be the success that Tesla needs to keep its raging growth narrative going. And of course, we all know this growth narrative is the only thing that keeps Tesla’s valuation as robust as it is compared to peers.

With rates at 5%, it becomes increasingly difficult to justify Tesla’s absurd valuation compared to other automakers.

Tesla sits at a PE of 77x and a price to sales of 8.8x. Ford and GM have PEs of 6x and 4.4x, and price to sales of 0.25x and 0.26x, respectively.

Why the gap so big you could land a jumbo f***ing jet in it? What is the only difference between the three names? They all make cars.

The difference is the idea that Tesla is somehow more than a car company and has some type of growth trajectory that these other companies don’t have.

And if the Cybertruck becomes an abject failure, it’s going to be extremely difficult for anyone to continue to justify Tesla’s valuation. Tesla’s other projects, like its AI and robotics, are both worlds behind industry leaders like OpenAI and Boston Dynamics. Full self driving is worlds behind GM’s Cruise — and Cruise just severely cut back on much of its testing due to safety concerns. The company’s touted future services, pick one from the hat — insurance, energy, solar roof tiles, “Tesla Mobility”, Dojo, robotaxis, etc. — have all not come to meaningful fruition. They’ve all been Potemkin Villages of sorts.

With no other “outs”, it means that if demand continues to slow for Tesla vehicles, as we have seen over the last year, and growth prospects don’t pan out but the company’s valuation somehow “magically” stays where it is, it’ll be time to ask further critical questions about trading in the name that I don’t want to even broach right now. Let’s just say that for now, I don’t think the “fundamentals” are going to carry the story.

Chart: Zero Hedge

For those of you looking for my comprehensive thoughts on why I think Tesla has peaked, you can read this article I wrote a little more than a year ago.

But the long and short of it now is that time has passed, and with rates at 5%, the market’s penchant for bullshit shrinks more and more on a daily basis. Every day, with rates where they are, the market demands a little bit more substance and a little less fluff. And I’m not sure that the Cybertruck launch is going to meet that requirement.

Sure, the starting price tag looks good, and sure, the video of the Cybertruck winning a race against a Porsche 911 looked good — and the models rolling off the assembly line this week probably look fantastic. But photos of the build quality online have been terrible, and there have been many points in Tesla’s history where they have not kept their promises when it comes to pricing and production targets. I think now, more than ever, the market is not going to be in the mood for taking Tesla’s word for things and missed targets — and Tesla’s valuation hangs in the balance.

Moving from Tesla back to Musk, the CEO’s transformation reminds me of Ryan from The Office. Musk has officially gone to the dark side: from the geeky intern, just scraping and looking for a little bit of recognition, to the egotistical and potentially unhinged CEO that has been showered with adoration for his accomplishments, yet may not know exactly how he is going to replicate his previous successes.

The one thing about having a valuation like Tesla’s is that there always has to be a carrot on a string if you’re not going to deliver the explosive growth and cash flow that the market has priced you for. And so far, Tesla still only remains a car company. And Cybertruck production targets and compressing margins due to price cuts on legacy models isn’t what the company needs to sustain a valuation of 77x sales.

Only time will tell what role Musk’s comments this week will play in the longer canon of his and Tesla’s history, but you can’t say they don’t come at an interesting time.

I know many people on the right would swear right now that Musk is in the midst of battling dark forces – the forces of government, the forces of regulation, and the forces of censorship, to name a few – but it feels to me like Musk is becoming somewhat of a dark force of his own.

Photo: Getty Images/Bloomberg

This makes me wonder if (1) Musk already has an indication that ugly things are ahead for him and Tesla, or if (2) Musk’s actions will wind up being the bricks laid to ground on a darker path going forward.

Either way, Tesla is a name that I in no way would want financial exposure to right now on the long side.

QTR’s Disclaimer: I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. These positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/03/2023 – 11:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/wTgy7AO Tyler Durden

Hammer-Wielding Man Shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ Kills Paris Tourist, Wounds 2 More

Hammer-Wielding Man Shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ Kills Paris Tourist, Wounds 2 More

A knife- and hammer-wielding French national killed a German and wounded two more people close to the Eiffel Tower on Saturday night, French interior minister Gérald Darmanin announced

The attack unfolded around 8 pm local time on the Quai de Grenelle, a tourist-magnet thoroughfare along the Seine River close to the Eiffel Tower. The assailant reportedly first approached a couple and fatally stabbed a Philippines-born German citizen in his back and shoulder.

As police gave chase, he managed to attack two more people with a hammer before cops mercifully subdued him with a Taser. At least one of those additional victims was an English tourist strolling with his wife and child, according to Le Parisien.

Investigators place evidence markers along a sidewalk in the aftermath of the fatal knife and hammer attack in Paris

“The assailant was neutralized very quickly by police. We tried to save the life of this man. It’s a man who died and they (the people who were attacked) were tourists,” Dr Patrick Pelloux tells BFM TV. The Englishman is hospitalized in stable condition. The other survivor is said to have been “badly hurt.” 

Police say they’ve arrested the 26-year-old attacker. However, demonstrating a lack of government transparency reminiscent of last week’s stabbing spree in Dublin by an Algerian immigrant, French authorities have not yet identified him or released details about his ethnicity. To their credit, however, they have said he is a radical Islamist who was born in Neuilly-Sur-Seine, an exclusive western Paris suburb, and who lives with his parents in the Esonne region south of the city.

They also said the individual had already been on a police watch list, having been sentenced in 2016 to four years in prison for planning a different terror attack. Authorities say that, on Saturday evening, he shouted “Allahu Akbar” — Arabic for “God is greatest” — and later told cops that he was angry that “so many Muslims are dying in Afghanistan and in Palestine.” 

An estimated 15,000 residents of Gaza have been killed by the Israel Defense Forces since the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks on southern Israel. More women and children have been killed there than in the entire Ukraine war that began in February 2022. 

With the Eiffel Tower illuminated behind them, French police cordon off an area after Saturday night’s attack (Stephanie Lecocq/Reuters via New York Post)

Darmanin also said the man had been previously diagnosed with psychiatric disorders. The investigation into Saturday’s bloodshed will be led by France’s anti-terrorism prosecutor’s office. 

“He [suspect] said to the police who arrested him that he could no longer accept that Muslims die in Afghanistan and Palestine,” the official said. 

Paris has endured many attacks fueled by Islamist extremism, most notably the November 2015 suicide-bombing and shooting attacks that killed 130 people — including 90 attending a concert at the Bataclan Theater — and injured another 400. In October, the French government raised the terror alert to the highest threat level after an Islamist radical stabbed a teacher to death. 

Paris will host the 2024 Summer Olympiad in July and August, starting with an unusual and ambitious opening ceremony that will present unique challenges for counterterrorism efforts. Unlike previous opening ceremonies, which take place within the confines of a secured stadium, Paris will host a parade of boats along the Seine, with hopes of attracting some 600,000 spectators along miles of river banks. 

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/03/2023 – 11:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/DSs1RKN Tyler Durden

Just Admit You Were Wrong!

Just Admit You Were Wrong!

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via DailyReckoning.com,

The answer to the question “Will they ever admit to being wrong?” is of course: no. I’m speaking in particular of the architects of the lockdown and mandate policies that wrecked the rights and liberties of billions worldwide.

Now they want to pretend like it never happened or that someone else is responsible. And they do this even as they hammer out policies and treaties that normalize that exact response – OK, some tweaks here and there – in the future, while forging institutions that crush dissent.

Those people we know about. They are rather hopeless.

Let’s address a different case, the run-of-the-mill pundit who got it wrong and just cannot admit it. These are the people who should trouble us more because saying sorry in this case is completely cost-free. In fact, the opposite is true.

Readers would cheer their humility and congratulate them for honesty. The only cost would be psychological in some measure. They are supposed to be these great opinion leaders and cannot bring themselves to admit that they were so bloody wrong on such a huge topic.

This comes to mind because of an effusive and even absurdist article by Peggy Noonan in The Wall Street Journal. It was about how and why Taylor Swift is the greatest thing America has to offer.

The language here is intentionally over the top and she knows it. It’s a fun way to write. I know this because I used to write this way all the time, celebrating the glories of vending machine chicken salad or the McDonald’s cheese stick or what have you.

My argument here is not with the hyperbole as such. The problem comes deep into the article where she says the following:

“Downtowns across the country — uniquely battered by the pandemic and the riots and demonstrations of 2020 — are, while she is there, brought to life, with an influx of visitors and a local small business boom. Wherever she went it was like the past three years didn’t happen.”

Battered by the pandemic? Seriously? The pathetic pathogen never closed a single business, school, church, country club, arts theater, mall, stadium or public park. Governments did that, on the advice of crazed experts who pushed for this nonsense with no concern for public well-being.

Media got involved cheering the lockdowns and denouncing anyone who doubted their glories. Big Tech censored dissident voices.

Noonan could have fixed that sentence with the addition of one word: response. The pandemic response. It would be easy enough to type that word. Sure, that’s a bit lame but at least it is accurate.

Why does she refuse? You know the answer. She was among the panic-mongers who thought the lockdowns, masks and vaccine mandates were just fine. She wrote about it constantly.

I don’t know why, but she did. She has assiduously avoided admitting this for years now, even to the point of writing about the “great resignation” without ever mentioning lockdowns or vaccine mandates.

She mentions in passing that “at the height of the pandemic more than 120,000 businesses temporarily closed” but does not mention they were closed by force! She continually refers to the “shock of the pandemic” without mentioning that it was the shock of the pandemic response.

Her penchant here runs far back even to the vaccine rollout, which she called a “human and scientific miracle.” Whoops.

Even at the onset of lockdowns, she was all in:

“We should go forward with a new national commitment to masks, social distancing, hand washing. These simple things have proved the most valuable tools in the tool chest. We have to enter each day armored up.”

OK, Peggy, we get it. You bought all the propaganda. Many did. We corresponded at the time and it was very cordial… until you realized that I was on the anti-lockdown side. It didn’t matter after that whatever evidence I presented to you that the government was up to no good. I sent link after link and was very friendly.

At that point, you stopped replying, despite having many mutual friends. I was not being antagonistic. I was simply hoping that you would get ahead of the curve. You didn’t want to get ahead of the curve. You wanted to thread the needle of opinion very carefully.

The trouble is that the needle changed or went away completely. Now you are stuck with your old opinions of the past, which you keep trying to justify in the least auspicious way possible. The article I cited was the latest example. I assume that you are going to keep this up so long as the WSJ affords you the space.

I cannot say that I fully understand this way of thinking. But this much is clear: Peggy is hardly alone. Nearly every writer in every venue talks this way. Finally, the media is talking about ill health, learning loss, shut businesses, demoralized population, angry voters, loss of trust, inflation, you name it. Finally there is talk about all of this.

But universally, the prattle is the same. It’s always the pandemic, never the government’s response:

  • “9 Ways the Pandemic May Have Led to Precocious Puberty” ~ Psychology Today

  • “Kids Played Team Sports Less In 2022 Than Before COVID-19 Pandemic” ~ Forbes

  • “Walking Trips Fall Sharply in Portland Post-Pandemic” ~ Axios

  • “Mesilla Restaurant Owner Navigates Pandemic Recovery” ~ Fox

And so on it goes, as if to wipe out the history of the worst public health policy in the history of humanity. Plenty of people want to do that. Certainly most governments in the world would like that.

Regardless, pundits should not help them. Even if they were wrong in the past, nothing is stopping them from admitting the truth now.

It would be nice if we would get some truth from politicians too rather than this strange silence. No one has had the guts to grill Trump in particular on the details of why he green-lighted the mess.

That aside, the pundit class is paid not to be government propagandists but tellers of truth. In this case, it simply would not take much, only a bit more than claiming that a single pathogen among trillions floating around caused the whole world to fly into upheaval.

Truly, these writers discredit themselves with their contorted attempts to pretend that the microbial kingdom and not government itself is responsible for disaster.

The truth is nonetheless getting out there, even if you cannot read about it often in mainstream news. We have to get this history correct.

Everything depends on it.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/03/2023 – 10:30

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/h5D34yB Tyler Durden

Jeff Ubben’s “Socially Responsible” Inclusive Capital Is Winding Down After Just Three Years

Jeff Ubben’s “Socially Responsible” Inclusive Capital Is Winding Down After Just Three Years

Activist Jeff Ubben in calling it quits with his Inclusive Capital Partners just three years after setting up the firm with a focus on social investing. 

In a memo, he told investors he would be “winding down some funds and returning capital”, two people familiar with the matter told Reuters/Yahoo Finance

InCap’s shutdown reflects the broader struggles hedge funds are facing in attracting new investment. Rates, inflation concerns, and geopolitical instability all played a role in more hedge funds closing than opening last year, the report says. 

The 61 year old former Fidelity employee was the founder of ValueAct Capital in San Francisco and was known as a discreet activist. Ubben preferred working quietly with companies rather than seeking public attention, the report said.

ValueAct, with investments up to $20 billion, took positions in diverse firms, including Microsoft and Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. Ubben, among other executives, held positions on various corporate boards.

In 2020, after planning a smooth transition at ValueAct and at an age when many consider retirement, Ubben founded InCap. The firm aimed to be an environmental and social impact investor, targeting companies that meet societal needs.

As one of his first high profile investments, Ubben became an investor in electric truck company Nikola, which saw its founder indicted on fraud charges less than 5 years after going public. 

Initially, Ubben aimed to raise up to $10 billion, believing that focusing on environmental and social issues could yield significant returns. As we have written about over the last year, it turns out that ESG investing/clean energy and producing actual returns are like oil and water

Recall, we wrote that a year after President Joe Biden’s significant climate legislation pledged substantial funding for the U.S.’s transition to clean energy, the sector has seen a sharp $30 billion decline in the value of its stocks over the past six months.

In 2021, InCap invested in Exxon, with Ubben joining its board during a challenging period for the company, marked by a board dispute with Engine No. 1, a new hedge fund.

Recently, InCap announced the sale of two million Exxon shares, valued at $216 million, indicating major portfolio adjustments.

Despite Ubben’s respected status, sources say InCap struggled to attract funds, especially as investor preferences shifted, particularly regarding ESG. With last year’s market downturn, investors prioritized returns over ESG considerations, the Reuters report said – go figure. 

 

Eric Scheriff, senior managing director at Capstone, told Bloomberg about ESG investing earlier this week: “We’re in the moment of realization now where some of the euphoria has worn off and we’re starting to realize it’s still not going to be easy.”

“In the final analysis, green investing has to be based on economic realities,” Jerome Dodson, the now-retired founder of Parnassus Investments concluded.

Vaya con dios, Jeff.  

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/03/2023 – 09:55

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/dRPsw6O Tyler Durden

Germany Infiltrated By ‘Economic Migrants’ Abusing An Asylum System, Claims Country’s Former Top Judge

Germany Infiltrated By ‘Economic Migrants’ Abusing An Asylum System, Claims Country’s Former Top Judge

Authored by Thomas Brooke via ReMix News,

European Union asylum laws are not fit for purpose and Germany is being abused by an influx of economic migrants with the luxury of handpicking which European nation they’d like to settle in, Germany’s former most senior judge has claimed.

Prof. Hans-Jürgen Papier, who served as president of the Federal Constitutional Court for eight years until 2010, accused successive federal administrations of acknowledging the shortcomings in the EU asylum policies but failing to do anything about it and called for fundamental reform to address the issue.

“We have another migration crisis,” Papier wrote in an op-ed for the Bild newspaper, claiming that “essentially nothing has changed” from the previous crisis of 2015.

“Many people come to our country from all parts of the world for clearly non-asylum reasons. The right to asylum is therefore being misused and, in many cases, applied for improperly in Germany,” he noted.

The former top German judge criticized the insufficient nature of the European asylum system as a whole, but further lamented the fact that this “is then reduced to absurdity at the internal borders when people who have entered Europe illegally can also choose where they ultimately want to settle, traveling through several EU states in order to get to Germany.”

Papier noted that under the Dublin II Regulation, which codified the requirement for asylum seekers to make their applications in the first European country they enter, this shouldn’t be allowed to happen.

“Nevertheless, Germany allows these people to enter the country anyway,” he wrote.

He called for the German government to resolve the matter “as quickly as possible” by introducing regulation “that works quickly and provides clarity.”

“It is not about affecting the right to asylum for people who are actually being persecuted, it is about protecting this right from being abused for reasons that are clearly unrelated to asylum.

“It cannot be the case that every man or woman in the world, even if there is obviously no reason for asylum, can illegally and ultimately make their way first to the European Union and then to Germany using the asylum law inappropriately,” he added.

Papier proposed a number of possible solutions to be discussed, including the third-country solution involving offshore processing, which has been considered in other European nations including Denmark and the United Kingdom.

 

Read more here…

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/03/2023 – 09:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2sYQyJ7 Tyler Durden

Occidental Private Jet Visits Buffett’s Hometown Twice Amid Speculation Of Major Shale Deal

Occidental Private Jet Visits Buffett’s Hometown Twice Amid Speculation Of Major Shale Deal

In a move that is raising eyebrows across the energy industry, Occidental Petroleum Corp.’s private jet made not one but two stops at a local airport in Omaha, Nebraska, in November.

The plot thickens when you consider Omaha is where Warren Buffett, Occidental’s top shareholder, resides.

These visits come as Occidental is gearing up for a new oil patch shale deal reportedly worth billions of dollars. 

Bloomberg reports Occidental’s jet took off from Houston, where the company’s headquarters is located and landed at Eppley Airfield in Omaha on Monday.

The plane was on the ground for three hours, flew to New York, and returned to Houston by midnight.

Tracking of the jet was made possible by the flight tracking website ADS-B Exchange, which monitors advanced surveillance technology embedded in planes that fly in highly regulated airspace. 

News of Occidental’s jet zigzagging around the county came days before Bloomberg reported Occidental was in talks to buy shale driller CrownRock LP for $10 billion. ADS-B Exchange data showed the jet visited Omaha two times last month. 

The latest data from Bloomberg shows Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. owns 25.90% of Occidental.

The recent activity of Occidental’s jet reminds us of when hedge funds were tracking the plane in 2019 when the company outbid Chevron Corp. to buy Anadarko Petroleum Corp. for $55 billion. 

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/03/2023 – 08:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/uALImj7 Tyler Durden

King Charles Delivers Highly-Politicised Speech To Support Collectivist Net Zero Project

King Charles Delivers Highly-Politicised Speech To Support Collectivist Net Zero Project

Authored by Chris Morrison via The Daily Sceptic,

It could have been worse. King Charles could have ascended to his desert dais and pronounced that we had just 96 months to avert “irretrievable climate and ecosystem collapse”. But that was the Right Charlie back in 2009, giving us the benefit of his sandwich-board scientific wisdom. These days it is all fashionable bad weather and undefined “tipping points”. The man is now King, and at COP28 he threw away his irksome politically-neutral constitutional role, wrapped himself in Guardianista pseudoscience, and punched down hard on the poor who will be forced to pay for the collectivist madness that is the Net Zero project.

King Charles is no friend of general humanity. Speaking at COP28, he said: “The Earth does not belong to us, we belong to the Earth.” As with many know-your-place elitists, he appears to abhor the impacts that humans have on the planet. He exhibits, sadly on a world stage, a snobbish distain for capitalism – what used to be dismissed in British aristocratic circles as ‘trade’. This capitalist trend over the last 200 years has harnessed the power of natural hydrocarbons to raise billions to a standard of living and health unimaginable to previous generations. In 2009, Charles said we can no longer afford consumerism and the “age of convenience” was over.

Not for the new British King, it need hardly be observed. He lives a life of pampered indulgence where no expense is spared to ensure his every comfort. On his accession to the throne, he added considerably to his Palace Portfolio. To spread his malevolent Net Zero fantasies, he has a fleet of cars, private planes and even a personal train at his command. He uses these to call for “transformational action” to be taken to save the planet. In his COP28 speech, he called for the restoration of nature, the need for sustainable agriculture, and co-operation between the public and private sectors.

Few calls could be more political in tone. The restoration of nature and sustainable agriculture is shorthand for largely meat-free diets and massive reductions in nitrogen fertiliser. The latter, in particular, will lead to worldwide famine. COP28 seems set to announce new food and agriculture restrictions using the tactic of demonising methane, a gas emitted by animals and humans that is barely measurable in the atmosphere due to a very short lifecycle. Whenever the subject of ‘co-operation’ between public and private sectors is raised, there is an immediate dash to count the spoons, since it can only signal a large transfer of cash from productive industries to unproductive and inferior green operations.

At one point in his COP speech, King Charles veered into sandwich-board territory claiming that “we are seeing alarming tipping points being reached”. There was no evidence presented to justify this claim, often made by climate extremists using modelled data. In fact, he didn’t even refer to any actual ‘tipping’ event that has been reached. Many scientists have concluded that bad, or extreme, weather events are no worse than in the immediate past. Many categories of natural disasters such as floods, droughts and ecosystem productivity “show no clear positive trend of extreme events”, note a group of four Italian scientists. They argue that the data shows there is no “climate emergency”.

None of these facts seem to matter to a political King, who, like a stuck Guardian record, keeps on pressing on with made-up emotional stories of impending climate Armageddon. At one point he referred to repeated cyclones battering vulnerable islands, something that cyclones have always done.

The King can always cherry-pick individual storms but there is plenty of evidence to show that hurricane and cyclone frequency, along with intensity, has changed little over the recent historical record, as the above graph shows.

Wildfires are a bit of a dud when it comes to whipping up climate hysteria, not least because the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change notes that most conflagrations are started by humans. “Human activities have become the dominant driver,” it observes. But when there is political Net Zero work to be done, the King is only too happy to overlook the evidence. In common with many other countries this year, Canada experienced its worst wildfires for a century, he said.

Despite all the human involvement, the above graph shows the gradual decline of global emissions from wildfires over recent decades. In fact, wildfires are almost impossible to pin on any changes on climate since so many other factors, such as arson and land management, are in play.

Net Zero is rapidly becoming the dominant political issue of the age. Its obvious collectivist nature gathers support from mostly sectional interests in society. It has no significant grassroots support, since it aims to restrict human lifestyles and wealth on a scale never attempted before in history. It is awash with junk science, fake statistics and computer models.

The late Queen, in her infinite wisdom, never went anywhere near it.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

Stop Press: David Cameron at COP28 has said the U.K. will pay £60 million in climate reparations to developing countries. The Epoch Times has more.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/03/2023 – 08:10

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/YatFGT8 Tyler Durden

Bank Error In Your Favor: Woman Discovers $86 Million Unexpectedly In Bank Account

Bank Error In Your Favor: Woman Discovers $86 Million Unexpectedly In Bank Account

Malaysia’s biggest bank has one unhappy client to deal with. 

One client of the bank, Maybank, Hafidzah Abdullah checked her account in November to find that she had an astonishing 404 million ringgit ($86.3 million) in it. The only issue, according to a Bloomberg writeup, is that she couldn’t access it at the time. 

Instead, she took to LinkedIn to share the news. “Dear Maybank. I appreciate your making my banking experience memorable,” she wrote online, complaining that glitches were commonplace on the bank’s site.

She called the recurring issues “a comedy of errors that nobody finds funny” – and that always required visits to an in-person branch to resolve. 

She added: “They say money can’t buy happiness, but Maybank knows how to buy frustration.”

Bloomberg wrote that others chimed in to support her online. “They treat you like a ball, kick you here and there. Am wondering what’s wrong with banks in Malaysia,” one person wrote in response. 

Finally Maybank’s head of group customer experience management, Shaikh Munir Ahmad, reached out. He said in a comment online that he had spoken to Abdullah and that she could now access her account. Of course, without the extra $86 million. 

“It was not a system-wide issue and the customer account was not compromised,” a Maybank person said, according to the report

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/03/2023 – 07:35

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/01eIDNU Tyler Durden