Stocks & Bond Yields Puke Amid ‘Most Volatile Earnings Season’ Since GFC

Stocks & Bond Yields Puke Amid ‘Most Volatile Earnings Season’ Since GFC

…well that escalated quickly…

Bad (macro) news was bad news today as jobless claims surged, manufacturing surveys slumped, and construction spending tanked, sending rate-cut expectations higher…

Source: Bloomberg

…but apparently prompting growth-scare anxiety that punched US equity markets in the face.

Small Caps crashed 4%, Nasdaq 3% and The Dow and S&P down 2%…

This was the S&P 500’s worst start to August since 2002.

The S&P broke back below its 50DMA…

…and the Nasdaq dumped back to its 100DMA…

Yesterday’s short-squeeze on The Fed was eviscerated as ‘most shorted’ stocks crashed 8% from yesterday’s highs…

Source: Bloomberg

Mag7 stocks lost $430BN in market cap today – a stunning swing from the 2.5% rally out of the gate thanks to META to then dropping almost 5% from the morning highs….

Source: Bloomberg

Semis were slaughtered today, erasing all of yesterday’s bid surge and then some – dropping to their lowest since mid-May…

Source: Bloomberg

Treasury yields also plunged today – led by the short-end (2Y -9bps, 30Y -3bps) – dragging yields down around 20bps overall on the week so far…

Source: Bloomberg

Notably, the 10Y yield broke back below 4.00% for the first time since February…

Source: Bloomberg

The yield curve steepened dramatically…

Source: Bloomberg

Bitcoin was clubbed like a baby seal again, testing down to $62,000 before bouncing a little…

Source: Bloomberg

Oil tanked after WTI tested up near $79 on MidEast tensions…

Source: Bloomberg

Gold was relatively quiet today, finding support at $2440…

Source: Bloomberg

Finally, if it has felt like a volatile earnings season, that’s because it is…in fact, as Goldman Sachs trader Brian Garrett noted earlier, this has been the most volatile earnings season since the financial crisis…

…by the end of this week we will largely be through earnings and onto a hopefully quiet August (and then the chaos of the lead-up to the election)…

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/01/2024 – 16:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/Tc0v32Q Tyler Durden

Hezbollah Chief Vows ‘New Phase’ Of War During Slain Commander’s Funeral

Hezbollah Chief Vows ‘New Phase’ Of War During Slain Commander’s Funeral

Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah in a Thursday speech coming on the same day as the funeral of Hezbollah military commander Fuad Shukr – who was slain in an Israeli airstrike on south Beirut on Tuesday – warned that Israel has crossed all “red lines” and thus the war has entered a “new phase”.

“The enemy, and those who are behind the enemy, must await our inevitable response,” he said in a speech video link broadcast at Shukr’s funeral. Nasrallah starting years ago broadcasts his messages from secret, high-secure locations, given Israeli intelligence has long sought to track his whereabouts.

“You do not know what red lines you crossed,” the Hezbollah leader said in reference to the separate strikes in Beirut and Tehran, the latter which killed Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh on Wednesday.

European Pressphoto Agency

Hezbollah had only in the last 24 hours belatedly confirmed Shukr’s death, considered Nasrallah’s “right-hand man” – after his body was pulled from under the rubble of a destroyed building in a south Beirut neighborhood on Wednesday.

Israel had boasted that it had “eliminated” the Shia paramilitary group’s “most senior military commander” – while initially Lebanese sources had denied it while seeking confirmation.

“We, on all the support fronts, have entered a new phase,” Nasrallah said, also in reference to Iran-linked ‘resistance’ groups across the Middle East. 

It didn’t take long for Hezbollah to unleash its first big salvo of rockets in past 48 hours against Israel’s Galilee region:

Overall, the speech while stern still suggested that Hezbollah wishes to keep the war ‘limited’ and contained, which has been the case over the past ten months of war. Still he vowed that vengeance is coming:

Nasrallah said unnamed countries had asked his group to retaliate in an “acceptable” way – or not at all. But he said it would be “impossible” for the group not to respond.

“There is no discussion on this point. The only things lying between us and you are the days, the nights and the battlefield,” Nasrallah added in a threat to Israel.

He stressed that “The response will come, whether spread out or simultaneously.” He described that the “enemy” has “opened a problem with everyone” and they do not know where the response will come from.

Iran too, is mulling a direct response. Nasrallah alluded to this in the following at one point in the address: “Do they imagine that they will kill Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran and that Iran will remain silent?

Al Jazeera has described the following scenes in Iran’s capital on Thursday:

Thousands have poured into the streets of Tehran to join the funeral procession of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh as Iran weighs its options after promising to avenge his assassination.

The bodies of Haniyeh and his bodyguard, who was killed alongside him in a strike blamed on Israel, were marched amid chants in the capital. Flags of Palestine, Lebanon’s Hezbollah and Hamas were seen as organizers handed out posters of Haniyeh.

Banners honored the Palestinian leader and the late Iranian general Qassem Soleimani, who was assassinated by a United States strike in 2020, among others.

“Avenging the blood of the guest is with the host, the world is waiting,” read the headline of the ultraconservative Keyhan newspaper, whose editor-in-chief is appointed by Iran’s supreme leader.

Israeli leadership has in response warned of all-out war if Iran attacks Israel, and yesterday Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin said that the US military would help Israel defend itself if it came under attack by Tehran. Presumably this would involve anti-air intercept assistance and the scrambling of fighter jets.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/01/2024 – 15:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/SF92gLB Tyler Durden

70% Of Students ‘Believe Speech Can Be As Damaging As Physical Violence’: Survey

70% Of Students ‘Believe Speech Can Be As Damaging As Physical Violence’: Survey

Authored by Daniel Isfresne via Campus Reform,

A new Knight Foundation-Ipsos study shows a decline in students’ views concerning the state of free speech on college campuses.

The study, released on Tuesday, reveals several key findings, including that 70 percent of students “believe that speech can be as damaging as physical violence,” as two in three students report “self-censoring” on some topics during classroom discussions. 

Republican students self-censor more, with 49 percent self-censoring on three or more topics versus 38 percent of Democrats and 40 percent of independents. “Republicans also tend to be more likely to report self-censoring on gender or LGBTQ+ issues (55%), racial issues (44%), and diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) issues (33%) than Democrats (32%, 30%, 15%) or independents (41%, 37%, 26%),” the results show.

1,678 currently enrolled college students aged 18 to 24 participated in the poll from March 7-28. Only 43 percent of these students feel that freedom of speech is very secure or secure today — that’s down from 73 percent of students who felt the same in 2016. 

Democrat students are also fueling the decrease in the percentage of those who believe free speech is secure. In 2021, 61 percent of Democrats said free speech was secure; that figure is 51 percent. 

Only about half of students (54 percent) believe colleges should “allow students to be exposed to all types of speech even if they may find it offensive or biased” — that percentage has decreased from 78 percent in 2016. 

60 percent of college students strongly or somewhat agree with the statement, “[t]he climate at my school or on my campus prevents some people from saying things they believe, because others might find it offensive.” 

Students want to participate in healthy debates, but only 32 percent say their college has programs specifically designed to promote constructive conversations among those who disagree. 

Eight percent of students report they would engage in disruptive actions—“either trying to stop a speech ahead of time or disrupt it during – to halt a speaker they oppose.”

In response to a request for comment from Campus Reform, the Knight Foundation shared a statement from Director of Impact and Learning, Kayla Gabriel: “It is our hope that campus leaders consider the opinions of students, as elevated in this research, as they cultivate their campus cultures this upcoming academic year.” 

Follow Daniel Idfresne on X and Instagram.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/01/2024 – 15:30

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/vDqiwdF Tyler Durden

New York Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Gag Order Challenge

New York Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Gag Order Challenge

Authored by Tom Ozimek via The Epoch Times,

A New York state appeals court has denied former President Donald Trump’s request to lift a gag order imposed in his business records falsification case, with the order remaining in place until the former president’s sentencing.

The Appellate Division, First Department issued an opinion on Aug. 1, stating that it had reviewed Trump’s challenge to the gag order, which was imposed in March by New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan, but opted to keep it in place until Trump’s sentencing in September.

A jury found the former president guilty in May on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

The court reasoned that the sentencing phase is a critical part of the criminal process and the gag order is needed to protect the individuals involved from potential threats, intimidation, or harassment. The judges wrote that maintaining the gag order was within their authority given the fact that there were ongoing threats after the jury returned a guilty verdict.

“Contrary to petitioner’s contentions, the People’s evidentiary submissions in opposition to his motion in Supreme Court demonstrate that threats received by District Attorney staff after the jury verdict continued to pose a significant and imminent threat,” the judges wrote in the order, rejecting Trump counsel’s argument that the trial’s conclusion was a significant change in the circumstances.

Merchan terminated parts of the gag order on June 25, adding that the rest will expire once sentencing is complete. The judge freed Trump to comment about witnesses and jurors but kept trial prosecutors as well as court staffers and their families off limits until sentencing.

The judge broke the original gag order down into three categories: statements about witnesses; statements about jurors; and statements about court staff and counsel, which was later extended to include family members of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and Merchan, but not the judge and district attorney themselves.

“Circumstances have now changed. The trial portion of these proceedings ended when the verdict was rendered, and the jury discharged,” Merchan wrote, terminating parts of the gag order.

The New York state appeals court stated in its Aug. 1 order that it found Merchan’s decision to keep parts of the order in place to be reasonable.

“Since the underlying criminal action remains pending, Justice Merchan did not act in excess of jurisdiction by maintaining the narrowly tailored protections in paragraph (b) of the Restraining order,” they wrote.

A request for comment sent to Trump’s spokesperson and legal team were not immediately returned.

During the trial, Merchan fined the former president $10,000 for what he said were violations of the gag order. He also warned the former president that he might have to jail him if he continued to violate the order.

Trump and his attorneys repeatedly asked Merchan and other courts to terminate the gag order, arguing that it violated his constitutional right to free speech.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/01/2024 – 13:55

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/gl7YeV5 Tyler Durden

CEOs Discussing Fed Policy On Earnings Calls Soars To Record

CEOs Discussing Fed Policy On Earnings Calls Soars To Record

The July FOMC meeting confirmed Powell and company are inching closer and closer to embarking on the interest rate cutting cycle. Rate traders are pricing in the first 25bps cut for mid-September. The Fed will only move into a cut cycle if inflation data cooperates and economic activity deteriorates. 

The Fed’s interest rate hiking campaign over the last 2.5 years has dented consumer spending and corporate profits, with borrowing costs slowing down the overall economy to tame inflation.

While the first rate cut won’t meaningfully make a difference for consumers, some of whom (low/mid-tier) are in rough shape, it will lower borrowing costs for companies big and small. 

Bloomberg data shows corporate America’s interest in the highly anticipated rate-cut cycle has surged to new record highs in earnings calls. 

From S&P 500 and Stoxx 600 companies, management teams mentioning the words “Federal Reserve” on earnings calls hit a new high on data going back to 2001 this earnings season.

“Powell was dovish yday and I think it’s a clear message from the Fed they are ready to cut in September (that was already priced) and more pointedly ready to respond to any signs of economic deterioration. We’ve got nearly 3 cuts priced into 2024 and some optionality on moving 50bp in September. 30 yr rates are close to breaking down. Equities are pricing soft landing, from this level of accommodation it will either take another large scale inflation surprise (but fci now rapidly loosing) or disappointment in economic growth. It’s been good news on inflation and I don’t see that stopping. Bad news has been good news on growth because there was scope for a lot more accommodation…from here it’s a bit harder,” Goldman’s Will Xu wrote in a note to clients on Thursday. 

One primary concern that Goldman analysts have is the weakening consumer. 

One week ago, Goldman analyst Natasha de la Grense told clients, “Not a great start to earnings season in Consumer, with very few positive surprises so far. Both high-end consumption and the low-income consumer are weak.”

Neil Birrell, chief investment officer at Premier Miton Investors, told Bloomberg, “If we don’t get a rate cut soon, the balance of risks will shift from escaping inflation to avoiding an economic slowdown.”

Soaring interest in Fed policy on earnings calls comes as no surprise as the Fed’s 2.5-year hiking cycle could soon be reversed if rate traders are correct (as of this note, traders are pricing in 3 25bps cuts through EOY).

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/01/2024 – 13:35

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/T9wkaJK Tyler Durden

Rudy Giuliani Reaches Last Minute Deal To End Bankruptcy Case

Rudy Giuliani Reaches Last Minute Deal To End Bankruptcy Case

Authored by Katabella Roberts via The Epoch Times,

Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani has agreed to a last-minute deal in his bankruptcy case and will pay an estimated $400,000 in administrative fees to a financial adviser hired by his creditors, court papers show.

The agreement was filed on July 31 in federal court in White Plains, New York.

According to the court filing, Giuliani, 80, will give his lawyers $100,000 to help pay the creditors’ forensic financial adviser, New York-based Global Data Risk.

The rest of the firm’s expenses will be paid from the proceeds of Giuliani selling either his New York City apartment or his Florida condominium, which are worth an estimated $5.6 million and $3.5 million, respectively, according to court documents.

Global Data Risk may also put liens on both of those properties to ensure Giuliani—who once served as legal adviser to then-president Donald Trump—pays all its fees, the agreement states.

Global Data Risk will be granted permission to foreclose if the fees still have not been fully paid after six months, according to the agreement.

The agreement still needs to be signed off by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Sean Lane of the Southern District of New York, who is overseeing the case.

Judge Says Giuliani May Have to Testify

It comes just days after the judge said that Giuliani may have to testify during a hearing about his financial situation if a deal regarding his finances could not be reached.

That came after he dismissed the case against Giuliani in June, finding it was in the best interests of those owed money by the former lawyer because he had failed to meet obligations of financial transparency.

However, in his July 24 order, Judge Lane said he had been unable to officially dismiss the case against Giuliani in court because the estimated $400,000 in administrative fees, accumulated during litigation, had not been paid.

Giuliani’s lawyers said their client was unable to pay the fees to the creditors’ forensic financial adviser as required under bankruptcy laws because he did not have the money to do so.

As such, the judge said he was considering initiating proceedings to assess the details of Giuliani’s current financial circumstances so that a detailed dismissal order could be created ensuring full fee payment.

“Such a route will inevitably include disclosure of documents and might include testimony under oath by the Debtor,” Judge Lane wrote at the time.

The judge ultimately ordered both parties in the case to submit court filings to provide their views on the most appropriate path forward by noon on July 31.

The agreement was filed less than three hours before the deadline, court documents show.

Giuliani filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in December 2023 after he was ordered to pay $148 million for defaming Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss when he accused them of committing election fraud in 2020.

Judge Lane’s June decision to dismiss Giuliani’s bankruptcy allows Freeman and Moss to seek enforcement and payment of the $148 million awarded to them in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia case.

His bankruptcy had previously put a hold on those collection efforts.

The Epoch Times has contacted an attorney of Giuliani for comment.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/01/2024 – 13:15

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/amG1Drh Tyler Durden

Hershey Slides As CEO Warns: “Consumers Pulling Back On Discretionary Spending” 

Hershey Slides As CEO Warns: “Consumers Pulling Back On Discretionary Spending” 

US consumers are tightening their belts in the second half of the year as pandemic savings dry up, credit card debt maxes out, and employment growth slows. Elevated inflation and high interest rates further pressure households, leading to a shaky start to the corporate earnings season. 

One week ago, Goldman analyst Natasha de la Grense told clients, “Not a great start to earnings season in Consumer, with very few positive surprises so far. Both high-end consumption and the low-income consumer are weak.”

From McDonald’s to Nestle to Pepsi, major restaurants and food companies have issued softer guidance, thanks partly to a slowdown in consumption spending

The latest food company to warn about consumers pulling back is chocolate bar maker Hershey, whose shares fell in the premarket after reporting a second-quarter top and bottom line miss and slashing guidance for the year. 

Shares were lower by about 3.5% in premarket. Shares have also been oscillating in a tight trading range for ten months. 

Here’s a snapshot of the second quarter earnings results (courtesy of Bloomberg): 

Adjusted EPS $1.27 vs. $2.01 y/y, estimate $1.44 (Bloomberg Consensus)

Net sales $2.07 billion, -17% y/y, estimate $2.31 billion

  • North America confectionery net sales $1.58 billion, -21% y/y, estimate $1.79 billion

  • North America salty snacks net sales $289.9 million, +6.4% y/y, estimate $279.1 million

  • International net sales $204.8 million, -8.9% y/y, estimate $227 million

Net sales at organic constant FX -16.8% vs. +5% y/y, estimate -7.52%

  • North America confectionery sales at constant FX -20.7% vs. +4.8% y/y, estimate -10%

  • North America salty snacks sales at constant FX +6.4% vs. +6.3% y/y, estimate +3.98%

  • International net sales at organic constant FX -10.4% vs. +6.2% y/y, estimate +2.28%

Adjusted gross profit $895.2 million, -20% y/y, estimate $959.9 million

Adjusted gross margin 43.2% vs. 45.2% y/y, estimate 41.7%

Organic volume/mix -18%

  • North America confectionery -22%

  • North America salty snacks +9%

  • International -16%

Hershey also lowered its 2024 guidance and expects net sales to slide 2%, compared with a previous outlook of 2% to 3% growth. The company expects a reported earnings per share drop of 1% to 3%, compared to its earlier outlook of flat earnings per share. On an adjusted basis, Hershey expects earnings per share to be “down slightly” from flat. 

“Today’s operating environment remains dynamic with consumers pulling back on discretionary spending,” Hershey Company President and Chief Executive Officer Michele Buck wrote in a statement, adding, “Our business has been impacted by these trends.” 

Add Hershey to the growing list of restaurants and food companies warning about a consumer slowdown.  

Goldman analysts have told clients to short low-income and mid-income consumer stocks. It’s only a matter of time before analysts start targeting upper-income consumer stocks. 

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/01/2024 – 12:55

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/eRYVh2j Tyler Durden

Matt Taibbi Uncensored: Kamala, Trump & The Death Of Objective Truth

Matt Taibbi Uncensored: Kamala, Trump & The Death Of Objective Truth

Submitted by QTR’s Fringe Finance

I had the great pleasure of interviewing Matt Taibbi this week. We talked about Kamala Harris’ fitness to be a Presidential Candidate, how Matt thinks it is ‘strange’ no questions are being asked about how Harris became the nominee, the failures of the Trump assassination attempt, why Matt thinks ‘profound’ changes are taking place in how Americans think about the world, and the future of government overreach in the U.S.

Taibbi is the head of Racket News and his reputation as a fearless investigative journalist precedes him. From his groundbreaking coverage of the 2008 financial crisis to his more recent explorations of censorship with the Twitter Files, politics, systemic inequality and the inner workings of Congress, Taibbi’s body of work reflects a deep commitment to uncovering truths and challenging conventional narratives.

On the recommendation of one of my readers, I first asked Matt how he finds the courage to do what he does. He told me: “I guess the sincere answer to that is I started my journalism career overseas in post-communist Russia. Some of my first mentors in journalism were actually Russian investigative journalists. They had just been given freedom of the press, free speech, sort of. But it was a very hazardous environment where if you wrote the wrong thing, people were getting blown up by exploding suitcases shot in their doorways, people jumping through windows with crowbars, that kind of thing.”

He continued: “So I watched those people work for like eight years. So anytime anybody talks about people like me being brave, I always kind of feel like rolling my eyes a little bit because, you know, in other parts of the world, journalists go through much tougher things and take much bigger risks. So the least we can do is what the job is. And I think, you know, journalists mostly, we’re not rocket scientists or doctors. The main job requirement is being, you know, willing to say obnoxious things to powerful people. I think, you know, that’s kind of the job baseline.”

From there, I asked Matt what unsuspecting countries people should know are now similarly censoring speech. His answer surprised me: “Well, in this new age of digital censorship, there’s a whole bunch of countries that you have to worry about now. I mean, I have a friend who got arrested in Germany. He’s a playwright who published a book. He was critical of the COVID policy, and he was trying to imply that the modern sort of health authorities were compared to, you know, he wanted to compare them satirically kind of to Nazis. So he, he, on the cover of his book is a mat, a white mask with a faintly visible white swastika. And you know, he gets, he’s up on charges now, you know, and there are a lot of these new digital censorship laws carry actual sentences that you can actually go to jail for, for, you know, putting the wrong social media post up, saying the wrong thing, but putting the wrong image in an advertisement or online.”

“This is happening in different places around Europe. Scotland just passed a very tough law. Canada is considering passing one of the more bizarre laws of I’ve actually seen in speech,” Matt told me. “It actually likely will pass and you can be convicted if they pass that they’ll be able to convict you for things you haven’t even done yet. So there’s all kinds of stuff that they’re doing in the West, which are really scary. And that’s one of the things that I think Americans don’t pay attention to because we only watch our own stuff and we don’t pay attention to what’s going on in our, you know, even our close allies.”

I then asked Matt about the bizarre swap of Joe Biden as the Democrats’ presidential candidate.

Matt told me: “Since 1968, we’ve had a system that has heavily relied on actual voters choosing those nominees. And they just decided kind of unilaterally to not do that this year. They did it twice. They did it in the primary season with Biden when they, for instance, Florida just canceled its primary and handed the delegates to Biden. New Hampshire did something even weirder where they held a primary. People went and cast votes. Then they canceled those results and held a second thing they called a nominating event on a Saturday night that was not open to the public, and they just had a bunch of party officials there who signed Joe Biden’s name to their delegates.”

I also asked Matt about the Trump assassination attempt, which I wrote about in my article Fearless. Matt explained why he thought something about the attempt simply didn’t add up. We talked about that, the methodology of Joe Biden being replaced by Kamala Harris, the loss of civil liberties and much, much more. 

You can read and listen to the full interview with Matt here

QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page hereThis post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have been hand selected by me, have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author, reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. These positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/01/2024 – 12:35

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/pERQmHG Tyler Durden

“The Descent Is Starting”: Stellantis’ CEO Has His ‘Back Against The Wall’ Trying To Sell Jeeps

“The Descent Is Starting”: Stellantis’ CEO Has His ‘Back Against The Wall’ Trying To Sell Jeeps

All of a sudden, Stellantis is having trouble selling Jeeps. And it comes at a time when SUV demand has never been greater.

Stellantis’ Ram pickup division has also slipped in sales rankings, and Chrysler now only produces minivans. This decline resulted in poor earnings and a 40% stock drop from March highs recently. Seven senior executives have also departed since January.

CEO Carlos Tavares, who recently secured a massive €36.5 million compensation package, has faced rapid setbacks. His strategy to protect profit margins led to higher prices for outdated products compared to competitors, resulting in lost market share and increased inventory, Bloomberg reported this week

Pierre-Olivier Essig, a London-based equities analyst at AIR Capital told Bloomberg: “The descent is starting and Tavares has his back against the wall. The cost cutting is exhausted and there isn’t enough innovation.”

The company is pulling out all of the stops to try and move metal, the report says. It reduced prices for the Jeep Compass and Grand Cherokee SUVs and added more features to adjust to higher interest rates. Despite this, Jeep’s US sales dropped 19% in the second quarter, the report said. 

However, Jeep will soon introduce two new electric models: the Wrangler-like Recon and the 600-horsepower Wagoneer S. But these introductions come at a time when interest in electric is starting to wane. 

On the other hand, Jeep also plans to reintroduce the Cherokee, which ceased production last year, affecting its competitiveness in the SUV market’s largest segment. Meanwhile, Ford has benefited from Stellantis’ struggles, selling over 400,000 SUVs in the first half, a record for the company.

From 2019 to spring 2024, Stellantis increased prices for Jeep by about 50% and Ram by 40%, compared to the industry average of 25%, driven partly by post-pandemic supply chain issues, according to Cox data.

Erin Keating, an executive analyst at market researcher Cox Automotive told Bloomberg: “Product mix and pricing are the two big challenges they have.”

Like Jeep, Ram saw a significant decline in the first half, with US sales of its pickups dropping 20% from the previous year. Ford’s F-Series also experienced an 8% decline, while GM boosted sales of the Chevy Silverado and GMC Sierra.

And Stellantis has faced significant executive turnover in North America. Mark Stewart, the COO, left in January to become CEO of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. Long-time Jeep and Ram executives Timothy Kuniskis and Jim Morrison retired within weeks of each other, and Jason Stoicevich resigned after two months as senior VP of US retail sales.

CEO Tavares told Bloomberg: “The transition that we are going through is immensely challenging. This is a bump. There will be other bumps. This will last for a few years — this is not a short-term turmoil — and the most resilient, the most focused, the most customer-focused, will survive.”

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/01/2024 – 12:15

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/fOzUYGP Tyler Durden

A $1 Million Starter Home Is Now The Norm In 237 American Cities

A $1 Million Starter Home Is Now The Norm In 237 American Cities

Authored by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times,

Hundreds of cities across the United States now have starter homes priced at $1 million dollars or more, as housing shortages push prices to record highs, according to real estate marketplace Zillow.

The typical starter home—or property in the lowest third of local home values—is worth at least $1 million in 237 cities, Zillow said in a July 25 report.

This is the highest number of cities with million-dollar typical starter homes in U.S. history, up from 84 cities five years ago.

Roughly half of the 237 cities are in California alone, followed on the list by New York, New Jersey, Florida, and Massachusetts.

By metropolitan area, the New York City metro area, which includes parts of New Jersey and Pennsylvania, leads with million-dollar starter homes in 48 cities. It’s followed by the San Francisco metro area (44 cities), Los Angeles metro area (35 cities), San Jose metro area (15 cities), and Miami and Seattle metro areas (eight cities each). Zillow attributed the price spike to “a housing shortage that worsened over the [COVID-19] pandemic.”

In June, 1.19 million homes were in inventory, far fewer than the 1.7 million properties in June 2019, according to data from real estate brokerage Redfin. The number of active listings also dropped during this period. The shortage of homes is keeping prices high.

The inventories dipped as mortgage rates shot up, giving many homeowners second thoughts about selling their properties for fear that they would have to buy a new home at higher rates. This helped tighten the housing supply and raise costs.

Zillow predicts that a “slightly more balanced market may be just over the horizon,” which would benefit buyers. The company stated that as the effects of the rate lock ease and builders continue to add more supply, more homes are coming on the market.

“With more homes [for sale], buyers have more time to weigh their options. Rising housing inventory is also helping the negotiating power swing in buyers’ favor as price cuts are at record highs for this time of year,” Zillow stated.

However, Rick Arvielo, head of mortgage firm New American Funding, disagrees that inventory could bring down prices.

“You’re not going to see house prices decline,” he said in an interview with Bankrate. “There’s just not enough inventory.”

Jessica Lautz, vice president of research at the National Association of Realtors, also doesn’t foresee home prices going down.

“We’re actually forecasting that home prices will continue to grow based on the lack of inventory and demand for home ownership,” she previously told The Epoch Times.

Election, Interest Rates

The cost of a typical starter home nationwide is just more than $196,600, according to Zillow, which called the price level “comfortably affordable for a median-income household.”

But as starter home prices have risen by more than half in the past five years, many prospective homebuyers have put off purchases. Last year, the median age of a first-time buyer was 35, a year older than in 2019.

Another factor contributing to buyer hesitancy is the upcoming election in November.

“I’m working with several buyers who are waiting for the election before they make a move,” Matthew Purdy, a Redfin real estate agent in northern Colorado, said in a July 25 statement.

“Some of them say they’ll only buy a home if their candidate wins. Others are waiting because they feel the economy and housing market are shaky, and hope it will improve after the election.

“I am working with a few foreign buyers who are wary about investing any more money in U.S. real estate before they see who takes office.”

After the election, mortgage rates will continue to play a key role in how willing buyers are to purchase a home. The mortgage rate on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage has declined by roughly 1 percentage point since the peak in late October 2023.

However, the rate remains more than double what it was three years ago. For mortgage rates to come down meaningfully, the Federal Reserve must bring down its interest rates.

The Fed has kept interest rates unchanged at a range between 5.25 percent and 5.50 percent since July 2023. Investors had expected rate cuts to kick off earlier this year, but that didn’t happen.

To make matters worse, rates could be pushed up further. Fed officials said during the agency’s June meeting that this was a possibility if inflation kept rising or remained elevated.

The longer the interest rates are kept at elevated levels, the longer mortgage rates will also remain higher, making things tougher for buyers.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/01/2024 – 11:55

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/BlwJXW2 Tyler Durden