In early March, Goldman’s John Marshall looked at the firm’s proprietary macro hedging indicator and found something peculiar: investors were buying stocks and discarding protection. As Marshall said at the time, this was a reflection of “How Trump Changed the Market”, and said added that “the cost of liquid long-dated hedges in equity and credit has collectively reached its lowest level in six years following the decline this week. The last time macro hedge costs were near this level across assets was in July 2015.”
He then warned that “while not likely the cause of the pullback in August of 2015 (the mini-flash crash), the lack of hedges in investor portfolios likely exacerbated the sell-off.”
Fast forward to today, when the most read piece of research on Goldman’s portal is the follow up piece from Marshall. Clearly, while the market has failed to sell off even modestly let along in a rerun of August 2015, Goldman has found a particularly “compelling” short-term divergence between credit and equity which it believes could lead to a quick and profitable convergence trade.
As Marhsall explains, credit has significantly outperformed equity over the past month on a risk-adjusted basis. More specifically, CDX IG 5Y has outperformed its corresponding equities by 1.8, 1.0, 1.3 and 2.0 standard deviations over the past 1, 2, 3 and 4 months, respectively. Marshall views this as an attractive entry point for relative value trades, i.e. a compression trade:
“For investors looking for a macro hedge, credit offers more attractive hedging opportunities. For investors adding to bullish positions, equity offers more attractive buying opportunities.”
The divergence in question:
And even more gaping divergence: between CDX HY and corresponding stocks:
Meanwhile, an example of where the trade does not show the above divergences, is in Europe where ITRAXX and equities have traded in line.
The reason why this trade is a continuation of his observations from a month ago discussing the collapse in hedging, is that according to Marshall, based on the instruments that have outperformed the most in recent days (credit derivative products), “this is part of the broader trend of institutional investors underpricing tail risk.“
This suggests that the main trade risk is that the divergence grows even bigger as investors continue to shun hedging, potentially stopping out anyone without a big enough balance sheet to eat the variation margin drawdown.
On the other hand, the upside is as follows:
we look back over the past 7 years at each time credit and equity have diverged by more than 1 standard deviation over a 1, 2 and 3-month rolling period. Divergences of this magnitude have occurred 10 times and lasted an average of 8 days. Over the subsequent 1 month, the lagging asset outperformed the leading asset by 2.5% with a standard deviation of 3.5%. Our study shows the “diverging asset” (the asset that drove the divergence) was responsible for 2/3rds of the convergence profit. This suggests that in the current divergence, hedging with credit may have a higher profit potential than long equity over the next month.
In short, buy IG and buy the corresponding equities for the upcoming compression. Alternatively, just buy IG which should account for nearly 70% of the potential upside. And, if the trade doesn’t work, just blame Trump, and not the Fed, who according to Goldman “changed the market.”
via http://ift.tt/2osH3ty Tyler Durden