Deutsche Bank: Central Banks Simply Can’t Afford Higher Rates With Global Debt So High

Deutsche Bank: Central Banks Simply Can’t Afford Higher Rates With Global Debt So High

By Jim Reid, chief credit strategist at Deutsche Bank

My theme this year has been that it’s going to be very complicated for financial markets with volatility high. The forces working in both directions (high growth and stimulus versus inflation and higher yields) are huge and both sides will dominate for periods causing us to move between extremes. There is little doubt that US growth is going to be very strong with our economists upgrading Q4/Q4 2021 growth to 7.5% last week.

With inflation this could mean nominal GDP getting close to 10%. The last time we were in double digits was the early 1980s. With these sort of numbers it has always seemed unlikely that bonds would have a calm low yield, low vol year. Even if growth and inflation eventually roll over in 2022 and 2023 we are not going to know for a few quarters yet. In addition without knowing who is going to win the mid-terms we can’t be sure that the Democrats aren’t going to dip into the fiscal well a few times more before the next Presidential election. When I talked about the inflation picture slowly turning before the pandemic, the major reason was that I thought we were moving more towards a helicopter money / MMT world and away from fiscal austerity. The pandemic has accelerated this and a Blue Wave has picked up the baton in its crest.

In risk, while many sectors and areas will benefit more from strong growth than lose out from higher yields, there is no doubt that some areas (eg US equities) are more exposed to secular growth (eg tech) than before and these have massively benefited from ultra low yields. This is a sizeable and influential part of the market.

Having said all this, there is little doubt in my mind that central banks will eventually lean quite hard against a sustained rise in yields. They simply can’t afford to see it happen with debt so high.

So far though, Fed officials have been largely relaxed over the recent moves, suggesting that it reflects more positive economic growth. But as it all happened so fast last week they will have had a chance to regroup and align their message for this week.

I’ll end this yield discussion by quoting my colleague Francis Yared (head of rates strategy) who said that the recent move had probably “happened too fast, but did not go too far”. He thinks that the (mildly so far) dysfunctional nature of the repricing should lead to some level of central bank intervention. It would make sense for the Fed to push back against front-end (up to Dec-22) pricing and the ECB to lean against the rise in longer-term real rates. However, from a medium-term perspective, the absolute level of yields is not too high given reflation proxies, the prospects for reopening and US fiscal policy

Tyler Durden
Mon, 03/01/2021 – 18:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3kyDfSR Tyler Durden

After 5 Relists, SCOTUS Grants Cert in Puerto Rico Case Biden SG Will Probably Switch Positions On

In September, Acting Solicitor Jeff Wall filed a cert petition in United States v. Vaello-Madero. This appeal from the First Circuit presented the question of whether Congress violated the Fifth Amendment by excluding Puerto Rico from a social security program. At the time, then-candidate Biden tweeted that “This ends when I’m elected President.” In other words, his administration would not take this position.

The briefing concluded on November 24, and the petition was distributed for conference on December 11. The case was then relisted five times. Finally, it was granted on February 26. Usually when a case is relisted several times, a Justice is working on a dissent from denial of cert. But here, after percolation, there was apparently enough support for a grant.

It is also possible that the Court was waiting for Acting SG Elizabeth Prelogar to withdraw the cert petition. Amy Howe observed at SCOTUSBlog:

Last month, Democratic lawmakers and religious leaders urged President Joe Biden to withdraw the lawsuit and give Puerto Rico residents access to SSI benefits, but Biden’s acting solicitor general, Elizabeth Prelogar, did not take any action in the case after replacing Wall. The justices granted the government’s petition on Monday; absent any further developments, the case will likely be scheduled for oral argument in the fall.

But that petition was not withdrawn. And the Biden administration will now have to reverse its position.

In rare cases, the Solicitor General will decline to defend a lower-court judgment. But usually in those cases, the losing party petitioned the Court for review. Here, the SG of one administration petitioned the Court for review, then the SG of another administration will agree with the lower-court decision.

As a result, the Court may appoint an amicus to defend the position taken by the SG’s former cert petition. Or the Court could DIG the case altogether.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3uJZnOJ
via IFTTT

After 5 Relists, SCOTUS Grants Cert in Puerto Rico Case Biden SG Will Probably Switch Positions On

In September, Acting Solicitor Jeff Wall filed a cert petition in United States v. Vaello-Madero. This appeal from the First Circuit presented the question of whether Congress violated the Fifth Amendment by excluding Puerto Rico from a social security program. At the time, then-candidate Biden tweeted that “This ends when I’m elected President.” In other words, his administration would not take this position.

The briefing concluded on November 24, and the petition was distributed for conference on December 11. The case was then relisted five times. Finally, it was granted on February 26. Usually when a case is relisted several times, a Justice is working on a dissent from denial of cert. But here, after percolation, there was apparently enough support for a grant.

It is also possible that the Court was waiting for Acting SG Elizabeth Prelogar to withdraw the cert petition. Amy Howe observed at SCOTUSBlog:

Last month, Democratic lawmakers and religious leaders urged President Joe Biden to withdraw the lawsuit and give Puerto Rico residents access to SSI benefits, but Biden’s acting solicitor general, Elizabeth Prelogar, did not take any action in the case after replacing Wall. The justices granted the government’s petition on Monday; absent any further developments, the case will likely be scheduled for oral argument in the fall.

But that petition was not withdrawn. And the Biden administration will now have to reverse its position.

In rare cases, the Solicitor General will decline to defend a lower-court judgment. But usually in those cases, the losing party petitioned the Court for review. Here, the SG of one administration petitioned the Court for review, then the SG of another administration will agree with the lower-court decision.

As a result, the Court may appoint an amicus to defend the position taken by the SG’s former cert petition. Or the Court could DIG the case altogether.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3uJZnOJ
via IFTTT

Biden To Impose Navalny & SolarWinds Related Sanctions On Russia This Week

Biden To Impose Navalny & SolarWinds Related Sanctions On Russia This Week

Biden is expected to roll out with sanctions this week penalizing Putin’s government for the alleged poisoning of Kremlin opposition leader Alexey Navalny. CNN cited two admin officials to say it will “happen in coordination with the European Union” but is still being “fleshed out by US and EU officials in the coming days.”

The officials said it’s part of Biden seeking to send a “strong message” to Russia as well as China and others that they can’t violate human rights with impunity.

Last month cities across Russia were hit by large, well organized and closely reported mass demonstrations in support of the jailed Kremlin critic, recently sentenced to 2.5 years in prison on a prior probation violation.

Currently all “options” for sanctioning Russia are said to still be under review ahead of the impending announcement, which can include the following:

The package proposed three types of sanctions: Magnitsky Act sanctions on the individuals who detained Navalny; sanctions under the Chemical and Biological Weapons Control and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991 (CBW Act); and sanctions under Executive Order 13382 — which is “aimed at freezing the assets of proliferators of weapons of mass destruction and their supporters,” according to the State Department.

And further according to the latest CNN reporting, “One option being discussed is an executive order focused on Russia which would trigger sanctions on the country for multiple assaults on US democracy and American personnel — including the SolarWinds hack and the bounties put on US soldiers in Afghanistan — in one package, one official explained.”

Via Reuters

White House press secretary Jen Psaki previously said that Biden’s “intention was also to make clear that the United States will act firmly in defense of our national interests in response to malign actions by Russia.”

Both the administration and the media are also now hyping that Biden’s “tough” stance on Russia stands in contrast to Trump’s handling of Moscow – despite the fact that Trump controversially ended cooperation on things like landmark arms control agreements, and further opened up Washington’s ability and that of US companies to send arms to Ukraine. 

Tyler Durden
Mon, 03/01/2021 – 18:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2PkFFsx Tyler Durden

After Leading School Closures, Berkeley Teachers’ Union Chief Busted Taking His Kid To In-Person Private Preschool

After Leading School Closures, Berkeley Teachers’ Union Chief Busted Taking His Kid To In-Person Private Preschool

Authored by Ryan Ledendecker via The Federalist Papers (emphasis ours)

The fight for the return of millions of schoolchildren to in-person learning continues to rage on, with various teachers unions wielding their political power to seemingly quash the idea, leaving America’s parents and students in a constant state of limbo while their academic progress continues to decline with remote learning.

That’s why Berkeley Federation of Teachers president Matt Meyer, who has incessantly preached about how unsafe it is for students to return to the classroom, came under fire from a local group of concerned moms after he was spotted dropping off his two-year-old daughter at a private learning institution for in-person learning, according to Fox News.

Guerilla Momz, a California group of concerned parents who are pushing for a return to in-classroom learning, captured video footage of Meyer dropping off his child, holding nothing back as they criticized his hypocrisy.

Meet Matt Meyer. White man with dreads and president of the local teachers’ union,” the group tweeted. “He’s been saying it is unsafe for *your kid* to be back at school, all the while dropping his kid off at private school.”

 After the video went viral around the country, Meyer was contacted by Fox News and, not surprisingly, attempted to justify his reason for taking his young child to in-person classes at a private institution while public school students remain in the dark.

There are major differences in running a small preschool and a 10,000 student public school district in terms of size, facilities, public health guidance and services that legally have to be provided,” Meyer said. “We all want a safe return to school. The Berkeley Federation of Teachers is excited that Berkeley Unified will be reopening soon with a plan, supported by our members and the district, to get our students back in classrooms starting later this month.

Meyer also took issue with the group of concerned mothers taking the video and posting it, calling it “very inappropriate” and remarked that it was a clear violation of his child’s privacy.

Some, like former PTA Berkeley Council president Mara Kolesas, said that Guerilla Momz took their attempts to expose Meyer too far and suggested that it’s an issue that needs to stay in the political realm.

“For me, you don’t need to attack people personally, you need to address it politically. When you start getting personal, you mix up dimensions, and you don’t get to discuss the real thing,” Kolesas said. “Here, the real thing is [Meyer] put fear before science, and the right of teachers before the right of kids. That’s the issue.”

While the idea of addressing the issue “politically” sounds good on paper, unfortunately, it’s not working. That’s ostensibly why the group of moms did what they did, to expose those who publicly insist on keeping kids home while quietly ushering their own children off to swanky, private institutions.

And Kolesas is simply flat wrong about Meyer “putting fear before science.” The “science” is clear — it’s absolutely acceptable and and completely safe to return children to the classroom, “politics” is what’s keeping that from happening.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 03/01/2021 – 18:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3sIvaxt Tyler Durden

“Major Flooding” Submerges Parts Of Kentucky As Gov. Beshear Declares State Of Emergency

“Major Flooding” Submerges Parts Of Kentucky As Gov. Beshear Declares State Of Emergency

After a weekend of torrential rain, Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear declared a state of emergency on Monday. State officials activated the State Emergency Operations Center to aid with rescue efforts as major flooding was observed, according to Lexington Herald-Leader

The declaration activated the Kentucky National Guard to assist first responders in water rescues, deliver supplies, and aid municipalities. 

“The impact of extremely heavy rainfall and flash flooding across the commonwealth led to numerous emergency rescues and evacuations in counties from west to east,” said Michael Dossett, director of the Kentucky Division of Emergency Management.

Three-day precipitation totals ending Mar. 1 show from Bowling Green to Somerset to Jackson to Pikesville at least 4 inches of rain was seen, in some areas, the totals are much higher. Bowling Green saw 5 to 7 inches, according to Meteorologist Ron Steve. Casey County had 6 inches, Boyle County had 5 inches and Madison County had 5 inches.

“Moderate flooding is expected along the Kentucky River, and could approach major flood thresholds in some locations,” tweeted National Weather Service (NWS) Louisville.

In Estill County, emergency management officials expect the Kentucky River near Ravenna to crest on Monday. They labeled it as a “historical flood.” According to emergency management, the projected crest was set at 36.9 feet, less than 3 feet higher than the record high. The stage for major flooding in the county is 31 feet.

Here are some scenes across the state showing devastating floods. 

Johnson County Judicial Center in Paintsville has sustained flood damage. 

Mudslides and washed-out roads in Pike County. 

People in Lexington along the Kentucky River are traveling by boat to scoot around town. 

More devastation in Johnson County.

A Twitter user tweeted their area was wiped out by flooding.

Water rescue operations. 

Major flooding between Lexington and Jackson.

A small town is nearly submerged. 

“I gotta say, I have never seen the flooding this bad in this region!” said Twitter user Dahboo7.

Drone captures flooding along the Red River. 

Tyler Durden
Mon, 03/01/2021 – 17:39

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3sJdMcf Tyler Durden

Punish Politicians for the Right Reasons

Matt Welch, Katherine Mangu-Ward, Peter Suderman, and Nick Gillespie gather on this week’s Reason Roundtable to reflect with fresh fury on the latest bureaucratic bottle-necking and duty dereliction. And they find some bits of good news for you too.

Discussed in the show:

0:24: New York is…not well.

23:56: What’s the takeaway of comparing Democrat- and Republican-run states in the face of pandemic management? (Look forward to a feature piece diving even deeper into this by Matt Welch.)

31:23: Weekly Listener Question: What does the Roundtable suggest to replace the current vaccine approval process?

46:45: Biden bombed Syria, and we’re reminded that behind the “he’s not Trump” hype, he’s still just a “status-quo institutionalist.”

49:13: Media recommendations for the week.

This week’s links:

Send your questions either by email to roundtable@reason.com or by voicemail to 213-973-3017. Be sure to include your social media handle and the correct pronunciation of your name.

Audio production by Ian Keyser.
Assistant production by Regan Taylor.
Music: “Angeline,” by The Brothers Steve.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2OdPSXn
via IFTTT

U.N. Human Rights Officials Call For Investigation of Navalny Poisoning

dreamstime_xl_42309336

Two United Nations human rights officials pressed today for an international investigation into the August 2020 poisoning of Russian political dissident Alexei Navalny. Only state actors, they claim, could have carried out the attack.

Navalny fell into a coma while on a domestic flight in Russia last summer. He was medically evacuated to Germany, where a novel form of the nerve agent Novichok was found to be in his system. Novichok is a banned neurotoxin developed by the Soviet and then Russian governments.

Agnès Callamard, the U.N.’s special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary, or arbitrary executions, and Irene Khan, the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, released a statement today calling for a “credible and transparent” investigation into Navalny’s poisoning. They expressly accused the Russian government of culpability.

“We believe that poisoning Mr. Navalny with Novichok might have been deliberately carried out to send a clear, sinister warning that this would be the fate of anyone who would criticise and oppose the government,” the statement says. “Novichok was precisely chosen to cause fear.”

The officials claim that the use of the nerve agent and the attackers’ expertise in handling the dangerous substance point to the Kremlin’s complicity.

“Mr. Navalny was under intensive government surveillance at the time of the attempted killing, making it unlikely that any third party could have administered such a banned chemical without the knowledge of the Russian authorities,” they wrote in a December letter to the Russian government.

After spending several months recovering in Germany, Navalny was arrested upon his return to Russia for violating the terms of his parole for a 2014 fraud conviction. The arrest sparked weeks of protests throughout the country.

Despite Navalny’s argument that he had been taken to Germany while comatose, left the country as soon as he was medically able, and informed prison officials of his whereabouts, a judge still sentenced him to more than two and a half years in a penal colony.

Last week, Amnesty International revoked Navalny’s status as a prisoner of conscience because of past comments the organization claimed “amounted to advocacy of hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, violence or hostility.” (Navalny has used a derogatory term for ethnic Georgians, and he called for their expulsion from the country during Russia’s war with Georgia in 2008. Navalny has since apologized for the epithet but has stood by several nationalist positions he has taken.) Amnesty International’s definition of “prisoner of conscience” excludes those who have “advocated violence or hatred,” and it has concluded that Navalny no longer makes the cut.

Nonetheless, the group continues to support Navalny’s release. “There should be no confusion: nothing Navalny has said in the past justifies his current detention, which is purely politically motivated,” the organization declared in an official statement. “Navalny has been arbitrarily detained for exercising his right to freedom of expression, and for this reason we continue to campaign for his immediate release.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3q0kpoI
via IFTTT

Punish Politicians for the Right Reasons

Matt Welch, Katherine Mangu-Ward, Peter Suderman, and Nick Gillespie gather on this week’s Reason Roundtable to reflect with fresh fury on the latest bureaucratic bottle-necking and duty dereliction. And they find some bits of good news for you too.

Discussed in the show:

0:24: New York is…not well.

23:56: What’s the takeaway of comparing Democrat- and Republican-run states in the face of pandemic management? (Look forward to a feature piece diving even deeper into this by Matt Welch.)

31:23: Weekly Listener Question: What does the Roundtable suggest to replace the current vaccine approval process?

46:45: Biden bombed Syria, and we’re reminded that behind the “he’s not Trump” hype, he’s still just a “status-quo institutionalist.”

49:13: Media recommendations for the week.

This week’s links:

Send your questions either by email to roundtable@reason.com or by voicemail to 213-973-3017. Be sure to include your social media handle and the correct pronunciation of your name.

Audio production by Ian Keyser.
Assistant production by Regan Taylor.
Music: “Angeline,” by The Brothers Steve.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2OdPSXn
via IFTTT