Dear Recently Graduated Millennials: Prepare To Work Until You Are 73

Our advice to recently graduating Millennials? Live long.

Because according to a just conducted analysis by NerdWallet, looking at the future of the average recent college graduate, and more importantly looking at the mountain of student loans each graduate will be saddled with and the implications for the earliest possible retirement age onset, Millennials may well have no choice but to postpone their retirement by about a decade, to the ripe old age of 73.

The reason for this, of course, is the magic of compounded interest: that “manageable” debt load grows and grows and grows even assuming one dutifully pays interest on time. And with unemployment at graduation running at 18%, that is a rather generous scenario. Still, even under base case assumption, the median student loan of $23,300 will end up costing students over $115K by the time they retire.

What does that mean in practical terms? “When will students be able to retire given that many are spending the first ten years (or more) of their careers paying off their hefty loans? NerdWallet… found that while retirement is certainly not impossible, for most it will have to wait until their early to mid 70s— over 10 years later than the current average retirement age of 61.” It goes without saying that all else is assumed equal. Alas, in the America’s welfare state future, few things will be equal, and most things will be far worse.

Which, one wonders, may be the secret plan after all: since by now everyone knows that the US’ welfare state is unsustainable for the mid- and certainly long-term future, what better way to avoid draining it, than to force those who would otherwise benefit into at least ten more years of work to pay off debts accumulated over 50 years earlier.

Quite a brilliant strategy when one thinks about it. And to think, all that was required was record low interest rates, fooling everyone into believing all those tens of thousands of dollars of debt, was cheap.

From NerdWallet

Key Takeaways:

  • Most of today’s college grads won’t be able to retire until 73 due to high debt load —12 years later than the current average retirement age
  • Given a life expectancy of 84, grads will only have 11 years to enjoy retirement
  • The median debt load of $23,300 will cost students over $115,000 (in today’s dollars) by the time they retire
  • Employer 401(k) matches are crucial, and will compose 50% of retirement savings

Student Debt Will Follow Graduates To Retirement

With the total amount of outstanding student debt approaching $1 trillion, the plight of debt-straddled college students is more important than ever. In the past 30 years, not only has the number of high school graduates enrolled in four-year universities increased by 11%, but college tuition has also soared over 200%. As more students attend college at a cost higher than ever before, Millennials have increasingly turned to loans to help finance their education. While much of the college debt dialogue is over immediate issues like employment and repayment, there is another glaring challenge that graduates will have to deal with for years to come: retirement.

When will students be able to retire given that many are spending the first ten years (or more) of their careers paying off their hefty loans? NerdWallet conducted a study that examined the financial profile of a typical college graduate and found that while retirement is certainly not impossible, for most it will have to wait until their early to mid 70s— over 10 years later than the current average retirement age of 61.

Quick Facts On Students And Their Debt

Here are some quick facts to give context on exactly what students are grappling with:

  • Median debt for a student upon graduation: $23,300
  • Percentage of students who are unemployed at graduation: 18%
  • The median starting salary for those who do have jobs: $45,327
  • Standard loan repayment plan: 10 years
  • Average yearly loan repayment: $2,858
  • Number of college graduates currently estimated to be in default: Over 7 million

$23,300 In Loans Ends Up Costing $115,096 By Retirement

The goal of the study was to find realistic retirement projections for the typical college graduate and create projections that applied to a broad range of students. The study compared three different financial profiles: the median graduate, with median debt and salary; the struggling graduate, with high debt and a below average salary; and well-off graduate, with low debt and an above-average salary.

Graduate Retirement Outcomes

Clearly, student debt has an impact on retirement outcomes. Currently, the average retirement age is 61. But for most of today’s college grads, the realistic retirement age will be closer to their mid-70s. Given an average life expectancy of 84, this will leave only 10-12 years for people to spend in retirement. The main reason for this is that although the median college graduate leaves with a seemingly manageable $23,300 debt load, 7% of a student’s earnings go toward yearly loan payments of $2,858 for the first ten years of his or her career. This prevents any meaningful contributions toward retirement. In fact, by the age of 33, when the typical college grad has finally paid off their standard 10-year loans, he or she can only be expected to have saved $2,466 for retirement—over $30,000 less than if the student had graduated with no debt. Even worse, the foregone savings carry a serious opportunity cost, as this money would have been earning a compounded rate of return every year until retirement. At the projected retirement age of 73, the lost savings directly attributable to student debt is $115,096, nearly 28% of total retirement savings.

Surprisingly, for the struggling graduate, the retirement outcome isn’t dramatically different. Despite being in nearly twice as much debt and starting with 10% less pay, the expected retirement age is still just 75, only two years later than the median case. The main reason for this is social security. Much has been discussed about whether or not social security will be around by the time Millennials retire. To be conservative, social security benefits are factored into the study at $11,070 (75% of current average) per year beginning at age 67. That said, a substantial reduction in benefits or the disappearance of the program altogether would significantly alter the retirement equation. If the current social security payouts were to remain unchanged for the next 50 years, the benefits would provide future retirees a significant boost by covering nearly 15% of their required yearly income in retirement.

Well-off Grads Retire 7 Years Earlier

The retirement prospects for the well-off grad are significantly better than the others as illustrated in the graph above.  By graduating with a reduced debt load and landing a job that pays 22% more, the well-off grad can expect to retire at age 67. This is a huge departure from the other cases, and demonstrates the importance of contributing to a retirement
plan early on in one’s career. Compared to the median grad, the extra $40,406 that the well-off graduate is able to contribute during the first ten years of his or her career results in a $446,452 difference in retirement savings by age 73.

So How Do You Beat The Odds?

Given these circumstances, should students resign themselves to an eternity of work with little to look forward to in their latter years? Not necessarily. Though an increasing retirement age does appear to be an inevitable economic reality, being conscious of this problem and tailoring financial and career planning accordingly can go a long way toward achieving retirement objectives. There are many factors that influence the ultimate age at which people are able to retire, but there are a few variables that have a particularly large impact. Making above-average yearly contributions to a retirement account, working for an organization with a decent 401(k) match, and making sure to invest money in index tracking mutual funds are three ways to help add years to retirement.

Employer 401(k) Match Is Crucial

As fewer and fewer companies offer defined benefit plans, Millennials will have to depend upon employer 401(k) plans to save for retirement. According to a recent Fidelity survey, the current median yearly matching contribution is $3,420. As shown below, these employer contributions are expected to make up roughly 50% of the retirement equation for Millennials. By working for a company that offers a yearly matching contribution of $4,420 ($1,000 more than the median), potential retirees can reduce their expected retirement age by up to three years.

 401(k) Match Composes Half of Retirement Savings

Make Above-average Contributions To Retirement Accounts

While working for a generous employer can do wonders for retirement, not everyone is in a position to be overly selective about whom to work for. Another important component of retirement planning is the yearly contribution rate. Making above-average contributions can significantly improve retirement outcomes. Though the study projects a 6% annual post-tax contribution (the average personal savings rate for Americans), increasing that number to 10% reduces the expected age of retirement from 73 to 69.

Invest In Index Funds

Contributing money towards retirement won’t be helpful if the money is simply left in a savings account or a CD. To earn a return, Millennials need to be willing to take some risk and construct an equity-oriented portfolio. This may be difficult for today’s grads who have seen the stock market seemingly implode every five years, but unfortunately, retirement will be impossible if people invest too conservatively. The study assumed a 6% yearly return on retirement savings which is a conservative figure given the historical performance of the market. That said, it is a rate of return that can’t be achieved by completely avoiding equity exposure. The best way for an individual to overcome this problem is by investing in index tracking mutual funds, which will offer a market return with low fees.

Retirement Isn’t Hopeless, But It Will Be Difficult

Far more than their parents, Millennials will have to rely upon proactive financial management to achieve their retirement goals. Each generation is afflicted with distinctive financial ills, but the challenge of college debt is unique to Millennials. The decline of pension plans, the uncertainty surrounding social security and the college debt epidemic have placed the onus on graduates to make conscious, forward-thinking decisions about their retirement.

Methodology

Future retirement statistics were projected by profiling three potential situations that students might find themselves: the median graduate, with median student debt and median starting salary; the struggling graduate, with a high debt load and a below-average salary; and the well-off graduate, with a low debt load and an above-average salary. The study factored in a range of other relevant variables to create the projections: average 2012 social security benefit, average 2012 401(k) match, 30 year average national salary growth rate, 30 year average inflation rate, 30 year annualized S&P 500 returns, life expectancy, 30 year average personal savings rate, 2012 Stafford loan interest rates, and standard loan repayment terms.

All projected figures are inflation adjusted and discounted back to 2013 dollar-terms.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/0hOUYJxZulo/story01.htm Tyler Durden

JPMorgan Settles With FHFA For $5.1 Billion

It’s Friday afternoon, do you know where your fortress-balance-sheet bank’s massive settlement deal with the government is…

  • *JPMORGAN TO PAY $5.1 BILLION OVER FHFA MORTGAGE CLAIMS
  • *FHFA SAYS JPM TO PAY ABOUT $2.74B TO FREDDIE, $1.26B TO FANNIE
  • *JPMORGAN PAYS $1.1B TO RESOLVE REPRESENTATION, WARRANTY CLAIMS
  • *FHFA SAYS IT’S SETTLED FOUR OF THE 18 PLS SUITS IT FILED IN ’11

$4 billion of this appears to be part of the $13 billion settlement ‘agreed’ last week; but still leaves the criminal cases from what we can tell… Full statement below…

JPMorgan Chase has reached an agreement to resolve all of its mortgage-backed securities (MBS) litigation with the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) as conservator for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae for $4 billion. This settlement resolves the firm’s largest MBS case and relates to approximately $33.8 billion of securities purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from J.P. Morgan, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual. The firm has also simultaneously agreed to resolve Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s repurchase claims associated with whole loan purchases from 2000 to 2008, for $1.1 billion.

 

Today’s settlements totaling $5.1 billion are an important step towards a broader resolution of the firm’s MBS-related matters with governmental entities, and reflect significant efforts by the Department of Justice and other federal and state governmental agencies.

 

 

FHFAJPMorganSettlementAgreement.pdf


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/PEyWCU1QWV8/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Guest Post: 4 Things To Ponder This Weekend

Submitted by Lance Roberts of STA Wealth Management,

It has been a very interesting week as the Government shutdown/debt ceiling debate debacle moves into the background.  The focus has now turned back towards the fundamentals of the market, economic environment and the ongoing Federal Reserve interventions.  What is becoming increasingly evident is that market participants are once again potentially throwing "caution to the wind" betting on a belief that the Fed's ongoing Q.E. programs will continue to trump valuations and economics.  After all, that has seemingly been the case up to this point.  The problem is that no one really knows how this will turn out.  However, as I discussed earlier this week, it is likely that we are close to finding out answer.

In the meantime, I will leave you with my weekly list of "things to ponder this weekend."

1) What An 81% Increase In Food Stamp Usage Means For The U.S. Economy

My good friend Doug Short, who is a daily must read, recently posted an article by Mohammad Zulfiqar on the impact of welfare, specifically food stamps, on the U.S. economy.  He states:

"Each day, there's growing evidence that suggests the American economy isn't experiencing any economic growth. Unequal job creation is just one of the main topics discussed in the mainstream, but sadly, there are many other facts and figures that show a gruesome image of the U.S. economy.

 

Consider this: since the financial crisis struck in the U.S. economy, the number of people using food stamps has been increasing. In 2007, there were 26.3 million Americans who were using food stamps; fast-forward to July 2013, and that number had enlarged to 47.6 million, an increase of almost 81% at the rate of roughly 13.5% per year."

Food-Stamps-1012513

"Considering all this, one must wonder what's going to happen to the key stock indices that continue to rise in value. Will the companies that sell consumer goods be able to earn revenue at the same pace as they did before?

 

The conditions in the U.S. economy are suggesting that consumers are struggling. One thing investors have to keep in mind is that when consumers are facing hardships, they tend to pull back on the spending that they don't necessarily have to incur. For example, a person who has lost a job and has very little savings will shy away from buying a new gadget, car, and/or house."

Read Entire Post

2) Where Did All The Bears Go?

In asking the question "Is A Major Correction Coming?" one my concerns have been the extreme complacency, or lack of fear of a market correction, by investors in the markets.  The good folks at Bespoke Investment Group recently pointed to this same issue.

"This morning's release of the individual investor sentiment figures from the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) showed that bullish sentiment increased from 46.28% up to 49.2%.  This is the highest weekly reading since January and represents the fourth straight week of increases.  At the same time that bullish sentiment is rising, bearish sentiment plummeted to 17.6%, which is the lowest reading since January 2012!  With all the hype in the media regarding the shutdown in October, it is pretty amazing to see that individual investors were unfazed by all the hysteria."

AAII-Bull-Bear-102513

As Bob Farrell's Rule #9 States:  "When all experts and forecasts agree; something else is bound to happen"

3) Markets More Exuberant Than In 1996

Tyler Durden recently posted an excellent piece of commentary by Damien Cleusix about valuations now versus when Greenspan uttered his infamous phrase of "irrational exuberance."

"'It is really going to end badly,' is the ominous warning that Damien Cleusix has issued to his clients as he believes we are now reaching the top of the secular bull market. Crucially, he sees US stock markets as 'grossly over-valued' but that it is hidden from most people's perceptions because (just as in 2000 and 2007) there are marginal sectors that make the 'aggregate' seem reasonable (not to mention the dreams of forward earnings.)

 

His novel approach of a point-in-time Price-to-Sales comp shows the median valuation its highest in 23 years.. and Alan Greenspan's infamous 'exuberance' valuations in 1996 were 40% below current levels of elation. Today, the significant difference with 2000 and 2007 is that government and central banks have already spent a lot of firing power to 'make believe' that everything is fine again. He concludes; 'there will be no place to hide when the tide turns.'"

 Zero-hedge-102513

Read The Entire Piece

4) The High Cost Of A Cheap Dollar

For the last several months in the weekly missive, I have been discussing that the strength of the dollar earlier this year was fleeting.  Furthermore, the real danger to the U.S. economy has been an ongoing "weak dollar" policy.

This past week R. David Ranson of the NCPA (National Center For Policy Analysis) wrote an excellent brief on the impact of a weak dollar on the U.S. economy.

"Milton Friedman demolished this argument more than 30 years ago:

 

'Another fallacy seldom contradicted is that exports are good, imports bad. The truth is very different… Exports are the price we pay to get imports. As Adam Smith saw so clearly, the citizens of a nation benefit from getting as large a volume of imports as possible in return for its exports, or equivalently, from exporting as little as possible to pay for its imports.'

 

Those who advocate 'export-led growth' often assert that cheap currency policies will increase exports and national output (gross domestic product) over time. However, there is a 40-year history to the contrary since President Richard Nixon ended fixed exchange rates between the dollar and other countries and allowed the dollar to 'float.'

 

The question at issue is not whether currency depreciation benefits the United States relative to other economies but whether it benefits the U.S. economy in absolute terms."

NCPA-102513

"Exports are part of the cost side of the economy; imports are the benefit the country gains in return for that cost. Economic policies that promote exports at the expense of imports, such as currency depreciation, reduce the growth of GDP over time. That shift substantially lessens long-term gains in the real value of exports produced by a cheap dollar. Public policy can manipulate the currency and the economy to increase the amount that exports contribute to national output (GDP). But a country that succeeds in this effort has impoverished itself. The phrase 'beggar my neighbor' is an understatement."

Read The Entire Piece

What I'm Thinking About

Next week is once again loaded with economic, and earnings, reports as we head into the end of the year.  I believe that the impact of the Affordable Care Act on the U.S. economy is being greatly underestimated as the associated costs are hitting consumers where it hurts the most. 

I received an email this week from a listener, Tony in Florida, who stated:

"I have a pre-condition which means that Blue Cross would not give me anything more than their 'Go Blue Plan.'  The new plan I am buying from them is plan #1419, which has an annual deductible of $6250.  This is the high end 'Silver Plan.'

 

I have to pay for all doctors visits in full, and only basic wellness is free, including a colonoscopy. I even have to pay for my own blood work. 

While I am okay with paying the high deductible; what I have a problem with is that the monthly premium is $613.06.  I'm 57, do not smoke and live in South Florida and only have a finite amount of income to live on."

If his story is accurate, the economic drag that will come from the ACA in 2014, and beyond, could be larger than currently expected.  What concerns me is that few individuals have given thought about what the financial/economic costs will be by trying to give everyone else something for free.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/AnWvS5PzjSI/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Stocks & Gold Soar As Macro Slumps

With US Macro slumping to 3-month lows, is it any surprise that markets everywhere traded with a decidedly Taper-off confidence this week. USD was sold (-0.6% on the week) though commodity currencies (CAD/AUD) were sold also. Stock 'traders' bought every dip, lifting the Russell 2000 for the 8th straight week (first time since 2003). Gold completed its best 2-weeks (+6.4%) in 23 months. Treasuries have been very quiet since Tuesday, ending the week 5-8bps lower in yield. Growth hope faded as Copper (-1%) and Oil (-3%) fell on the week and earnings overall tumbled. Of course, it wouldn't be Friday if we didn't melt-up into the close (helped by a VIX slammer) and sure enough the S&P tagged its all-time highs as panic buying ensued with just minutes left in the week. Headlines will crow of new all-time-highs for the S&P (but credit remains a non-believer, not buying the rip).

 

 

US Macro has collapsed at its fastest pace in 8 months over the last 3 weeks… (notice the continual lower highs of US Macro since the recovery…)

 

and as we have now been indoctrinated into the "bad news is good news" mantra, that means buy stocks… (with Trannies leading the way off the lows…)

 

Discretionary, Industrials, and Homebuilders lead the pack off the lows across sectors…

 

And on the basis that the Fed wil never step away, Gold has seen its best 2 weeks in 23 months…

 

and gold and silver recoupled perfectly in the week as Copper and Oil (growth?) slide…

 

Treasuries have been very dull as stocks soared the last 3 days…

 

and despite notable dispersion (CAD/AUD weakness – global growth?) the USD has sunk on the back of more EUR buying…

 

 

and of course the ubiquitous VIX-slam, ES melt-up into the Friday close…

 

 

and credit markets remain the great non-believers…

and this was NOT a short squeeze – as "most shorted" names sold off very rewardingly for the shorts… (doubling the markt's move to the downside)…

 

Charts: Bloomberg


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/jinpoYFnxD4/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Stocks & Gold Soar As Macro Slumps

With US Macro slumping to 3-month lows, is it any surprise that markets everywhere traded with a decidedly Taper-off confidence this week. USD was sold (-0.6% on the week) though commodity currencies (CAD/AUD) were sold also. Stock 'traders' bought every dip, lifting the Russell 2000 for the 8th straight week (first time since 2003). Gold completed its best 2-weeks (+6.4%) in 23 months. Treasuries have been very quiet since Tuesday, ending the week 5-8bps lower in yield. Growth hope faded as Copper (-1%) and Oil (-3%) fell on the week and earnings overall tumbled. Of course, it wouldn't be Friday if we didn't melt-up into the close (helped by a VIX slammer) and sure enough the S&P tagged its all-time highs as panic buying ensued with just minutes left in the week. Headlines will crow of new all-time-highs for the S&P (but credit remains a non-believer, not buying the rip).

 

 

US Macro has collapsed at its fastest pace in 8 months over the last 3 weeks… (notice the continual lower highs of US Macro since the recovery…)

 

and as we have now been indoctrinated into the "bad news is good news" mantra, that means buy stocks… (with Trannies leading the way off the lows…)

 

Discretionary, Industrials, and Homebuilders lead the pack off the lows across sectors…

 

And on the basis that the Fed wil never step away, Gold has seen its best 2 weeks in 23 months…

 

and gold and silver recoupled perfectly in the week as Copper and Oil (growth?) slide…

 

Treasuries have been very dull as stocks soared the last 3 days…

 

and despite notable dispersion (CAD/AUD weakness – global growth?) the USD has sunk on the back of more EUR buying…

 

 

and of course the ubiquitous VIX-slam, ES melt-up into the Friday close…

 

 

and credit markets remain the great non-believers…

and this was NOT a short squeeze – as "most shorted" names sold off very rewardingly for the shorts… (doubling the markt's move to the downside)…

 

Charts: Bloomberg


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/jinpoYFnxD4/story01.htm Tyler Durden

The Last Time “This” Happened, Stocks Fell 15%

As we head into the vinegar strokes of 2013 with the world awash with liquidity and ever ready to BTFATH, we note that the last time the S&P 500 saw two consecutive years when the index did not go negative year-to-date was 1975-1976. As Bloomberg notes, just as in 2012 and 2013, we have not seen one day close below the previous year’s closing level but as Marketfield’s Michael Shaoul comments “eventually circumstances will change sufficiently to make the equity market a treacherous place,” and if history is any guide, just as 1977 saw stocks drop 15%, then 2014 may reacquant investorsd with what “risk” and “volatility” means in US equities.

 

 

Of course, a 15% drop in today’s environment would be crushing… with margin at record levels and the world rehypothecated to the nth extreme…

 

Source: Bloomberg


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/CiDWoX-YmZ4/story01.htm Tyler Durden

The Last Time "This" Happened, Stocks Fell 15%

As we head into the vinegar strokes of 2013 with the world awash with liquidity and ever ready to BTFATH, we note that the last time the S&P 500 saw two consecutive years when the index did not go negative year-to-date was 1975-1976. As Bloomberg notes, just as in 2012 and 2013, we have not seen one day close below the previous year’s closing level but as Marketfield’s Michael Shaoul comments “eventually circumstances will change sufficiently to make the equity market a treacherous place,” and if history is any guide, just as 1977 saw stocks drop 15%, then 2014 may reacquant investorsd with what “risk” and “volatility” means in US equities.

 

 

Of course, a 15% drop in today’s environment would be crushing… with margin at record levels and the world rehypothecated to the nth extreme…

 

Source: Bloomberg


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/CiDWoX-YmZ4/story01.htm Tyler Durden

US Foreign Policy SNAFU Deja Vu – US-Backed Rebels Lead Al-Qaeda Resurgence

It’s happening again. The US lack of intervention in Syria (and implicit and explicit support for the rebels) has apparently emboldened none other than Al-Qaeda. As the WSJ reports, a flurry of recent attacks by al Qaeda-linked militants in Iraq – strengthened by their alliance with jihadist fighters in Syria – is threatening to undo years of U.S. efforts to crush the group, widening sectarian conflict in the Middle East. Iraqi security officials say al Qaeda-linked fighters from the militant group Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham, or ISIS, are moving aggressively to re-establish a base of operations in Anbar province, the stronghold of the Sunni insurgency during the U.S.-led war in Iraq.

 

 

Via WSJ,

The chaos across the border in Syria and Iraqi Sunnis’ feeling of discrimination under the Shiite-led government has reignited the kind of intense sectarian strife that brought Iraq to the verge of civil war in 2006-2007. A security vacuum left by the withdrawal of American combat troops in December 2011 is also helping the fighters regain a foothold.

 

 

Iraqi security officials say al Qaeda-linked fighters from the militant group Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham, or ISIS, are moving aggressively to re-establish a base of operations in Anbar province, the stronghold of the Sunni insurgency during the U.S.-led war.

 

If the extremists succeed, they would undo one of the hardest-fought gains of U.S. forces and their Iraqi allies. By the time of the U.S. pullout at the end of 2011, the insurgency had been significantly weakened, in large part by a U.S. alliance with moderate Sunni tribesmen.

 

 

Following recent attacks in Anbar and the northern city of Mosul, Syrian and Iraqi jihadis openly congratulated ISIS operatives on jihadi Web forums.

 

Whereas attacks in the rest of the country tend to be isolated acts of terror such as car and suicide bombings, Anbar officials say attacks in the province look more like muscular efforts to gain and hold territory.

 

The growing instability in Iraq coincides with the strengthening of jihadist rebels in Syria, many of them foreign fighters, battling to unseat President Bashar al-Assad.

 

The fighters flow fluidly back and forth across the Iraq-Syria border, staging attacks on both sides, Iraqi intelligence officials said.

 

 

“The regional situation is applying huge pressure on us,” said Falih al Essawi, the deputy head of Anbar provincial council and a member in a prominent Sunni tribe. “ISIS is trying to control the borders to find a means to transport weapons, equipment and fighters between the two countries.”

 

 

While most local residents in Anbar don’t support al Qaeda, many see the group as a last bastion of resistance against Shiite domination.

 

“ISIS isn’t facing any refusal or resistance from the locals,” said Mr. Tou’ma, the Shiite legislator.

 

 

The Obama administration, in turn, has angered its Persian Gulf allies with its overtures to Iran and its decision not to intervene in Syria.

 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/GIv7muHu9HY/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Forget Lloyd and Jamie: Meet SEC Arch-Nemesis #1

Via Mark Cuban's Blog Maverick blog,

Its not fun being in the government’s crosshairs.  But there is comfort in knowing that the then Head of Enforcement at the SEC , Linda Thomsen (now of Davis & Polk law firm. I’m guessing her clients are proud !) went to the Nth degree to make sure she knew the smallest details of my case before moving forward !

SECemail1  

SEC Internal Email of MC Pictures 2

SEC Internal Email of MC Pictures 4

SEC Internal Email of MC Pictures 3

SEC Internal Email of MC Pictures 5

Internal Email of MC Pictures 5

SEC Internal Email of MC Pictures 1

 

ZH – What a sad state of affairs… when day after day we highlight (along with Nanex) the millions being stolen millisecond by millisecond tight under their ignorant noses…


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/hen_5mocX0Y/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Labor Dept. Says Furloughed Federal Workers Can’t Double-Dip On Unemployment Benefits

How anyone thought this made any sense in the first place was a little beyond us, but the Labor Department has ruled that the Federal employees who were furloughed while the government was shutdown were not eligible for unemployment benefits (as well as back-pay)…

  • *FEDERAL WORKERS DURING SHUTDOWN NOT ELIGIBLE FOR UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS: CNBC

So no double-dipwe await the union-based class action suit…


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/2qSZzLLYpsk/story01.htm Tyler Durden