US Embassy In Baghdad’s Green Zone Under Attack

It appears that a new sectarian civil war is beginning to erupt in Iraq during a sensitive government transition phase, and the United States and its local allied forces in the Baghdad government are targets. 

According to early breaking reports tonight at least three mortars have struck near the US embassy’s gate in the protected ‘green zone’ at the heart of the Iraqi capital.

Unconfirmed photo of tonight’s attack circulating on Iraqi social media. 

Though there’s currently no reports of injuries or significant damage, Western journalists on the ground say the embassy was specifically targeted by Iran-backed Shia militias

And elsewhere in Basra, to the south, there are reports that Iran’s consulate is under siege and further that more than a dozen local Shia militia HQ offices have been torched

In Baghdad, regional sources indicate loud sirens are blaring at the American embassy in the aftermath of the attack

 

Tonight’s targeted attack comes two days after ten pro-Iran Shia militias in the country published a statement vowing to expel foreign troops and advisers by force if they didn’t immediately leave Iraq. 

“We will deal with them [foreign troops in Iraq] as occupying forces, and we will use our legitimate rights by employing all possible means to force them out of the country,” the Iraqi factions warned, adding that foreign troops were “in their sights”.

The Tuesday statement further declared there was an “Anglo-American-led dirty and dangerous conspiracy to impose a devilish coalition” on the people of Iraq which seeks to weaken the government and make it Baghdad a puppet Brett McGurk, who is the White House appointed special envoy for the anti-ISIL coalition. 

Currently a tense tug-of-war is underway as the United States and Iran struggle to influence the formation of the next national government in Baghdad. Elsewhere in Iraq popular protests and riots are springing up in response to lack of basic services like electricity and clean water. 

Over the past days Iraqi Prime Minister Haider Abadi has further stirred tensions by sacking key government ministers a move interpreted by many as sectarian driven. 

Developing… 

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Cr1tfb Tyler Durden

Federal Employees Have Higher Pay, More Job Security Than Private Sector

Submitted by Daniel Mitchell of Mises Wire

President Trump has proposed a one-year pay freeze for federal bureaucrats, which has reinvigorated the debate over whether compensation levels for the civil service are too lavish.

The Washington Post opines this is nothing but “government bashing,” but this chart from my former colleague Chris Edwards should be more than enough evidence to show that federal bureaucrats have a big advantage over workers in the economy’s productive sector.

And there is plenty of additional evidence that federal employment is very attractive. For instance, it’s just about impossible to get fired from a bureaucracy.

Though defenders of the civil service sometimes make the preposterous claim that nobody gets fired because bureaucrats are such good employees.

The low rate at which federal employees are fired for poor performance doesn’t prove the government accepts it but instead “could actually be a positive sign,”… A report from the Merit Systems Protection Board in effect responds to members of Congress and others who contend that federal managers don’t care, or don’t dare, to take disciplinary action because of civil service protections. “…If the agency is successful in preventing poor performance…, a small number of performance-based removals could actually be a positive sign,” MSPB said. …Of the 2.1 million federal employees in a government database…, about 10,000 are fired for either poor performance or misconduct each year. …That low rate of firing has been cited in proposals to force agencies to take action… Individual employees, too, commonly express dissatisfaction with how agencies handle poor performers among their co-workers.

I have to confess that my jaw dropped when I read this article. Maybe we should ask veterans whether they think all federal bureaucrats do a good job?

Or we can ask non-profit groups whether they think IRS bureaucrats are top-quality workers? Or ask anyone who has ever tried to navigate the federal government?

We also know that the counties where most federal bureaucrats reside are now the richest region of the entire nation.

The three richest counties in the United States with populations of 65,000 or more, when measured by their 2016 median household incomes, were all suburbs of Washington, D.C., according to data released today by the Census Bureau. Eight of the 20 wealthiest counties with populations of 65,000 or more were also suburbs of Washington, D.C.–as were 10 of the top 25. …With Falls Church City included in the 2015 data, the nation’s four wealthiest counties were D.C. suburbs.

To be fair, this data is also driven by all the high-paid lobbyists. contracts, consultants, and others who have their snouts buried in the federal trough. So the incredible wealth of the DC region is really an argument for shrinking the size and scope of the federal government.

But the bureaucracy is part of the problem.

Interestingly, even the Congressional Budget Office concluded that bureaucrats are overpaid. And CBO almost certainly understated the gap, as noted in congressional testimony.

The CBO report’s headline figure is that, on average, federal salaries and benefits are 17 percent above private-sector levels. … I would consider the CBO’s reported federal compensation premium to be on the low end… when I analyze federal employee wages using the methodology that the progressive-leaning Economic Policy Institute has used in numerous studies of state and local government salaries, I find an average federal salary premium of not 2 percent but of about 14 percent. … The CBO chose to value federal employees’ pension benefits using a 5 percent discount rate. Using that discount rate, the federal employee retirement package was found to be substantially more generous than is received by comparable private-sector employees. But…corporate pensions are not nearly as safe as federal pensions, as witnessed by pending benefit reductions for “multiemployer” defined benefit plans. Valuing federal pension benefits using a lower discount rate to better reflect their safety would find a higher overall federal compensation premium.

Notwithstanding all this evidence, the unions representing bureaucrats nonetheless try to crank out numbers showing federal employees are underpaid.

To be sure, overall compensation levels don’t tell us everything. It is important to adjust for education, skills, and other factors.

Which is why the most useful, powerful, and revealing data in this debate is produced by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which measures voluntary quit rates by industry. If there is a lot of turnover in a sector of the economy, that suggests workers are underpaid. But if there are very few voluntary departures, that suggests workers in that part of the economy are overpaid.

And the numbers from BLS clearly show that federal bureaucrats are far less likely to leave their positions when compared to employees in the private sector.

This five-fold gap is staggering. I have lots of friends who work for the federal government. Most privately confess that they know that are making out like bandits. I think I’ll send this chart to the few holdouts.

By the way, I shared the numbers about quit rates for state and local bureaucrats back in 2011. Same story, though the compensation gap isn’t quite as large and may be driven mostly by unfunded fringe benefits.

P.S. I’m much more interested in shrinking government rather than shrinking pay levels. The correct pay for bureaucrats at the Departments of TransportationHousing and Urban DevelopmentEducationEnergy, and Agriculture is zero. Why? Because those bureaucracies shouldn’t exist.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2M2Kb7D Tyler Durden

1 In 4 Facebook Users Delete Facebook App As Millennial Exodus Continues

Americans’ relationship with Facebook has shifted to “It’s Complicated.”

Facebook bears have been having a fantastic third quarter as the stock has wiped out more than $130 billion in market cap. And for anybody brave (or foolhardy) enough to short the FAANG heavy weight, their year was only made better by Wednesday’s Congressional testimony by Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg. During the hours-long ordeal (Unlike Sandberg, Dorsey attended two hearings), Senator Mark Warner’s threats of looming regulation – “Congress will have to set social media regulation” – weighed on the Nasdaq as Facebook and other major constituents sunk like a stone.

Nasdaq

While Sandberg projected an aura of poise for the duration of her grilling by the Senate Intelligence Committee, she made several notable flubs (particularly her clumsy handling of Kamala Harris’s prodding questions about Facebook’s efforts to contain hate speech), which only furthered the market’s distress. And in the latest sign that the furor ignited earlier this year by the Cambridge Analytica scandal has yet to die down (and indeed may have permanently damaged Facebook’s brand), the Pew Research Center made the bombshell claim that one in four Facebook users have now deleted the company’s mobile app from their phones. The claim was made in a study published Wednesday.

Chart

What’s worse, that number becomes much more significant when the focus is on 18-29-year-olds – 44% of that demographic say they’ve deleted the app. Declines among older users were much lower (12%). But of course young people are the most treasured demographic for social media firms because of their reputation as trend-setters. In another sign that Cambridge Analytica has made Americans more privacy-conscious (and thus more likely to deprive Facebook of valuable user data), the study claimed that just over half of Facebook users age 18 or older – 54% – said they have adjusted their privacy settings in the past 12 months, according to Pew, which collected the survey data between May 29 and June 11. Meanwhile, 42% of users say they’ve taken a break from checking the platform for a period of several weeks or more.

Chart

All told, some 74% of Facebook users say they have taken at least one of these three actions in the past year. And while Republicans and conservatives are (justifiably) more skeptical of bias exhibited by Facebook and other social media giants, the data show that both Democrats and Republicans were equally likely to have deleted Facebook’s app or slowed or stopped their usage of the platform.

To be sure, Facebook’s problems began even before the user-privacy scandal: User-engagement data collected by Cowen’s showed a significant drop in engagement during the first quarter – a sign that users are spending less and less time using Facebook. Of course, the teens have long since migrated to Snapchat and (Facebook owned) Instagram. This latest study is just another discouraging sign that one of the pioneers of the social media landscape is finally seeing its luster fade.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2wNJ3ze Tyler Durden

Social Justice Books Your Kids Are Reading For College

Authored by Grace Gottschling via Campus Reform,

Each year, hundreds of colleges and universities across the United States assign incoming freshmen a “summer reading” book that is discussed throughout the year. 

Campus Reform reviewed the summer reading assignments from over 400 schools. While many selections focused on motivation and self-help, Social Justice was the overarching theme this year, including topics on immigration, racism, and sexuality.

While not every book assigned was overtly left-leaning, several books chosen this year explore explicitly liberal themes. This has been an ongoing trend among liberal colleges, who create mandatory programs like summer readings to communicate social justice themes to students.

The Kiss: Intimacies from Writers, edited by Brian Turner, is a collection of short stories written by several authors who recall romantic encounters from a variety of situations and locations. The Kiss has been assigned to incoming freshmen at Sierra Nevada College.

“From Sioux Falls to Khartoum, from Kyoto to Reykjavik; from the panchayat forests of India to the Giant’s Causeway on the coast of Northern Ireland; in taxis and at bus stops, in kitchens and sleigh beds, haystacks and airports around the globe—people are kissing one another,”  the description from publisher W.W. Norton reads. “The sublime kiss. The ambiguous kiss. The devastating kiss.” 

“A deliciously diverse anthology of essays, stories, poems, and graphic memoirs, where writers explore the deeply human act of kissing,” the description continues.

The Hate U Give, by Angie Thomas, follows the fictional aftermath of an unjustified police shooting of an unarmed black boy. The novel has been assigned by six schools, including the State University of New York at Brockport and Kansas State University. 

“The novel goes on to raise cogent and credible counter-arguments to the flattening narratives often presented by authorities and echoed by many media outlets in shooting cases involving young black males,” declares a review by The Atlantic. “Thomas’s novel keenly understands the dangers of defaulting to the cop/vigilante versus ‘thug’ framing device: The deceased get put on trial, rather than their killers.”

The Handmaid’s Tale, by Margaret Atwood, is a fictional account of a near-future society in which the United States has been replaced by a patriarchal theocratic regime where women’s primary focus is replenishing the waning population.

“Women are the main target of the regime’s brutality,” a review from The Guardian surmised. “Their rights and personal freedoms have been abolished. They are no longer allowed to work, to own assets or to be in relationships not sanctioned by the state. They are now categorised according to marital status and reproductive ability.”

The Handmaid’s Tale was assigned by four schools, including the University of California, Berkeley and Northwestern University.

Octavia’s Brood: Science Fiction Stories from Social Justice Movements, edited by Walidah Imarisha and Adrienne Maree Brown, is a collection of short stories by a variety of authors involved in social justice and activism. The book was created and named in honor of award winning author Octavia Butler. 

Octavia’s Brood is described by NY Journal of Books as an exploration of “current social issues such as capitalism, climate change, gentrification, immigration, etc. through the lens of science fiction and with the goal of social change.”

The stories, as described by the Journal, “suggest that science fiction or speculative fiction is indeed the ideal venue for imagining a world without war, violence, prisons, or capitalism.”

Octavia’s Brood was assigned by Western Washington University.

No Apparent Distress: A Doctor’s Coming-of-Age on the Front Lines of American Medicine, by Rachel Pearson, documents the author’s medical experiences, including her time at an abortion clinic. The book has been assigned to the incoming class at Lehigh University.

“Pearson’s inspired collective of illuminating clinical episodes immediately sparks to life with anecdotes from her early work in a female-owned and -operated abortion clinic in her 20s,” a Kirkus review states. “Her experience there as a young, bilingual patient advocate counseling Spanish-speaking women greatly broadened her perspective on women’s issues, ‘the suffering that women go through,’ and it solidified her decision to pursue a career in medicine.”

In The Country We Love: My Family Divided, by Diane Guerrero, documents Guerrero’s experience after she illegally immigrated to the United States with her family as a child. The book explores how Guerrero went from an undocumented immigrant to a famous actress serving as an Ambassador for Citizenship and Naturalization under the Obama administration. 

“Like many of the more than 11 million undocumented immigrants in this country, her parents worked in countless low-paying menial jobs while in constant fear, knowing that they could be snatched away any time,” Publisher’s Weekly noted in its review. “They tried to obtain green cards and citizenship through legal channels, but were scammed by a con artist.” 

The autobiography was assigned by the University of Houston and the University of South Carolina, Beaufort.

USC-Beaufort explains that it assigned the book to “provide opportunities for students to gain cultural competence and understand different perspectives.”

Becoming Nicole: The Transformation of an American Family, by Amy Ellis Nutt, was assigned by three schools, including California State University, Northridge and CSU-Sacramento. The fictional novel is based on a real family’s experience raising twin boys, one of whom decided to transition to female as a child. 

“When trying to illuminate the possible biological origins of transgenderism, Ms. Nutt explains that genital formation and sexual differentiation of the brain are distinct processes that may not always correspond,” a New York Times review details. “When theorizing about this particular, beguiling case—transgenderism in one of two identical twins—she notes that even a fetus’s position in the womb can affect its hormone intake.”

The New Jim Crow by Michelle Alexander breaks down the relationship between mass incarceration of black Americans and Jim Crow laws. Alexander is currently a visiting professor of Social Justice at Union Theological Seminary

“[Alexander] wrote this book for liberals like her to alert them that this system—in which people are being targeted, criminalized, stereotyped to support popular complacent consent for criminalization, incarcerated, and then denied full citizenship upon release—is a legacy to the racial caste system that was Jim Crow,” according to The New Orleans Review.

Alexander’s book has been assigned by two schools this summer, including the University of Missouri Law School, which describes the book as “controversial and provocative, arguing that the war on drugs and unequal enforcement of criminal laws have legalized old forms of discrimination regarding employment, housing, voting rights, educational opportunities, and other public benefits.”

The most commonly assigned book this year is Between the World and Me, by Ta-Nehisi Coates, which explores a black father’s advice to his young son regarding race and living as a black man in modern America. The book explores different periods of American history in which race played a key factor, such as the American Civil War, the development of historically black colleges, and modern Chicago.

“Americans have built an empire on the idea of ‘race,’ a falsehood that damages us all but falls most heavily on the bodies of black women and men—bodies exploited through slavery and segregation, and, today, threatened, locked up, and murdered out of all proportion,” according to Coates’ publisher, Penguin Random House

The book asks several questions, such as “What is it like to inhabit a black body and find a way to live within it? And how can we all honestly reckon with this fraught history and free ourselves from its burden?”

Topping the list, Between the World and Me has been chosen for the summer reading by eight colleges this summer, including the University of Vermont, Pacific College, Augustana University, and Westfield State University.

“Coates’s book offers a timely exploration of both the lived experience of race and the structural consequences of racism, weaving together individual experiences and broad insights,” the University of Vermont explains. “As such, the book models critical inquiry, offering students and all of us at UVM an example of what it means to pursue ideas and their consequences, drawing on multiple disciplinary perspectives.”

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Co2uVr Tyler Durden

FBI Hid Fact That Russia Thought Carter Page Was An “Idiot” Unworthy Of Recruiting: Sperry

The FBI, in its ham-handed FISA application on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, somehow forgot to include the fact that Russian spies thought Page was an “idiot” who was unworthy of recruiting, according to Paul Sperry of RealClear Investigations

The FBI was aware of Russians’ skepticism that Page knew anything of value or was a significant player because the bureau had recorded them voicing such doubts in a wiretap, from an earlier espionage case involving three Russian spies working undercover for the Kremlin in New York. –RCI

The FBI of course used that 2013 case as part of the FISA application – claiming to have evidence of Page’s recruitment by the Kremlin, however the “idiot” part was deliberately withheld. 

They have been made public only in redacted form, professing evidence that Page was “recruited” by Russian intelligence and had “coordinated” with the Russian government. But “that’s a mischaracterization of the facts in the case,” a congressional source said. –RCI

This vital detail was also omitted from three subsequent renewals of the wiretap warrant, at least one of which Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein signed off on. The warrants from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) enabled the DOJ/FBI to spy on Page and others he was in contact with for almost a year, according to Sperry’s sources. 

As Sperry notes, when the FISA warrants are viewed in totality, it’s clear that “the court was not alerted to this seemingly critical information,” according to congressional sources, which happened despite the FBI and DOJ officials having full access to the 26-page court filing.

The FISA applications omit the fact that a Russian intelligence officer called page ‘an idiot,’ ” one congressional source said. The official spoke only on condition of anonymity due to the still-classified nature of the information. –RCI

What’s more, former FBI officials as well as agents familiar with FISA warrants say that the DOJ’s affidavits for Page appear to be “material misrepresentations” which fail to adhere to so-called Woods Procedures which require the accuracy of facts from sworn declarants – procedures which were strengthened in 2003 by Robert Mueller, then director of the FBI

Withholding material and exculpatory evidence from the FISA applications may also have violated Page’s Fourth Amendment protections against omissions of material facts that would undermine or negate probable cause to search.

It is illegal,” said veteran FBI agent Michael Biasello. “The affiant” — the person swearing to the affidavit — “cannot cherry-pick only information favorable to the case.” –RCI

Who’s exposed?

According to Sperry, if the DOJ ever prosecutes itself for this and other FISA abuses, senior officials who swore out the Page warrants could be subject to perjury and conspiracy charges, incluging James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Sally Yates and Rod Rosenstein – who could all be barred from appearing before the FISA court as well. 

Read the rest here

via RSS https://ift.tt/2wRIMfn Tyler Durden

It’s A Dollar-Based Boom Shortage More Than Anything

Submitted by Jeff Snider of Alhambra Investments

Liquidity preferences are one of the least discussed economic concepts. There are several channels into which monetary instability can hamper the real economy. A “dollar” squeeze doesn’t just impact banks, they often pass it along further down the economic chain.

In its most extreme form, we had something like 2009. Some of the best companies all over the world found themselves stranded through nothing they had done. The Great “Recession” was bad, meaning even the best businesses suffered on revenue and profits. But even sure-survivors were shut off from cash, abandoned by banks and funding markets at the worst possible time.

I’m talking about companies like McDonalds which needed (and always needs) to fund working capital regardless of health, ill or not, on its top or bottom lines. Banks withdrew liquidity backstops and credit lines, and then commercial paper became impossible to negotiate on reasonable terms.

Some like McDonalds, Verison, and Caterpillar were forced to almost beg. In one of the more absurd aspects of the 2008 panic, there was the global fastfood chain knocking at the door of the Federal Reserve getting it to buy commercial paper the market wouldn’t on any terms. Big Macs had become Too Big To Fail, too.

What do you do if as a C-Suite officer you found yourself in such a situation? The first thing is that you vow never to be so vulnerable again. As a company, you make it a policy, informal or otherwise, to self-insure on liquidity. That means any number of things, up to and including holding large cash balances far greater than you ever would have before August 2007.

It also means managing your cost structure down the tenth of a penny in search of hidden future liquidity risks. Hiring new workers and building new facilities are in terms of cash huge, huge commitments beyond today. The standards for undertaking them just added a new chapter.

And if the overall economy is at best lackluster on top of all this?

You can begin to appreciate why so many corporations have said, “screw it, buy back the stock instead.” On the surface, it appears to be a Catch 22 but only if you don’t see the underlying issue for what it really is. The economy doesn’t grow because no one will seriously invest in anything but stock price growth.

According to the BLS, productivity has picked up a little once again. Since the downturn in 2015-16, productivity has increased a bit on average from those lows. This isn’t surprising. Instead, it reinforces one of the most insidious aspects of the lack of real economic growth these last eleven years.

This current “boom” is little more than the usual low-grade upswing that always follows each and every “unexpected” downturn. Companies know this in a way Economists never will. Buy back the stock, since even when it’s one step forward inside boardrooms they know what they will never say publicly; the return of “dollar” volatility will mean two steps back. Liquidity risks all over again.

Total hours have picked up since the beginning of 2017 but not nearly as fast as the peaks of the prior two upturns. At an average of 2.2% in Q2 2018, that’s substantially less than 3.0% figured for Q4 2014 and 2.8% in Q1 2012. That’s why output, real GDP, in what has been the best quarter since 2014 was materially less than 2014. Even the “best” of times aren’t so good anymore.

Companies that are overly attuned to liquidity risks and therefore overmanage costs aren’t going to be heavily competing for new workers – no matter how many times the Wall Street Journal or Washington Post may come up with some wild story about how one HR department or another is attempting to handle a purportedly shocking, nationwide labor shortage.

The simple and easy answer to any difficulties finding and securing new workers, especially during a true economic boom, is to pay them.

There continues to be, unequivocally, absolutely no evidence whatsoever that there is a labor shortage to even the smallest degree. None. According to yet another labor force data point, Unit Labor Costs, wage pressures for still another quarter/year remain historically subdued.

In fact, since Q3 2017, Unit Labor Costs have been decelerating on a year-over-year basis. In Q2 2018, they rose by less than 2%. It doesn’t matter how low the unemployment rate goes, there is no relationship with wages, pay, therefore income and economic recovery. NONE.

In early 2007, when the unemployment rate was last about as low as it has been over the last year, Unit Labor Costs rose by just about 4% – more than twice the pace of the current quarter in which the unemployment rate is testing the threes. In 2000, when the unemployment rate had dipped below 4%, Unit Labor Costs gained more than 4.3%. There is just no case for a tight labor market, let alone any shortage.

Companies aren’t paying for workers because they don’t actually want a lot of new labor. That’s way too much commitment without the credible prospects for sustained economic growth. At least with share repurchases they can use funds for something that will raise the share price (executives get paid) and not risk sending it into a tailspin with future cash commitments they can’t easily shed if things go wrong again – which they do every few years. They are not focused at all on growth but on risk.

There is no boom. If there was, productivity would be surging as companies heavily invested in productive capacity and bought loads of new labor at whatever price the market will demand.

This updated employment data is more than consistent with the construction figures. In terms of major potential outlays, those that feature not just demands on current cash but also entangle any business in future sustained liabilities, companies are reluctant to do the very things that the economy needs to grow; the so-called supply side.

Historically low productivity isn’t some myth, call it R* or even a negative neutral interest rate if you want. The problem continues to be eurodollar. With another “rising dollar” in the works, thus another potential global downswing becoming more and more visible each passing month, is it more or less likely this is all going to change so that a real boom can happen? In other words, are companies finally about to throw caution to the wind, or are they going to batten down the hatches for a fourth time?

These questions don’t just get asked of US businesses, obviously. We have an initial sense of how many globally are facing the dollar already.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Nj6hHV Tyler Durden

Goldman CFO Says Report That Bank Is Abandoning Plan To Trade Cryptocurrencies As “Fake News”

One day after bitcoin and other cryptos tumbled on a Business Insider report that Goldman Sachs was abandoning plans to open a trading desk for cryptocurrencies…

… the bank’s chief financial officer looked to “clear the air” what was really going on.

Speaking on stage at the TechCrunch Disrupt Conference in San Francisco, Goldman Sachs CFO Martin Chavez said “I never thought I would hear myself use this term but I really have to describe that news as fake news,” CNBC reported.

Chavez looked to knock down the report about the banking dialing back plans, but also make clear that there’s never been a timeline for this effort.

“When we talked about exploring digital assets that it was going to be exploration that would be evolving over time. Maybe someone who was thinking about our activities here got very excited that we would be making markets as principal and physical bitcoin, and as they got into it they realized part of the evolution but its not here yet.”

The price of bitcoin and other top cryptocurrencies tumbled after the initial report earlier this week, which however was never confirmed by Goldman. The Wall Street bank had been considering the launch of some sort of cryptocurrency option for clients for the past year. But it’s never been quite clear just what the bank was planning.

“In response to client interest in digital currencies, we are exploring how best to serve them in this space,” a Goldman spokeswoman told CNBC in October, when outgoing CEO Lloyd Blankfein tweeted that Goldman was “still thinking about bitcoin,” and that the bank was “not endorsing/rejecting.”

“Know that folks also were skeptical when paper money displaced gold,” Blankfein said at the time.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2NpLgv0 Tyler Durden

NJ Police Raid GoFundMe Scammers After Couple Spends $400K In Donations For Homeless Vet

Police in Florence Township, New Jersey executed a search warrant Thursday morning to comb through the home of a couple who raised over $400,000 for a Philadelphia homeless man, Johnny Bobbitt Jr, reports CNN

Florence Township Chief of Police Brian Boldizar said that the warrant was for a search of a property belonging to McClure and D’Amico. 

In a statement, Burlington County Prosecutor Scott A. Coffina confirmed a search warrant had been executed “in connection with a criminal investigation into the Johnny Bobbitt matter” but said the couple have not been charged with anything. –CNN

Last October, Bobbitt came across Kate McClure after she had become stranded on the side of I-95 in a bad section of Philadelphia.  Even though he was living on the streets, he used his last 20 dollars to buy her some gasoline so that she could get home.

To thank him, McClure and her boyfriend Mark D’Amico created a GoFundMe campaign to raise money to help Bobbitt get off the streets.  The original goal was to raise $10,000, but the story went mega-viral and the campaign ultimately raised a total of $403,000. But McClure and D’Amico never gave Bobbitt the money. Instead, they took charge of it and bought him the things that they thought he “needed”.

As we previously reported, Bobbitt lawyered up and has alleged that the couple committed fraud and conspiracy by taking large amounts of the donations to “enjoy a lifestyle they could not afford” and using the account as “their personal piggy bank.” Bobbitt’s attorney, Chris Fallon, asked a judge to appoint a supervisor to manage the money in the fundraising account.

And last Thursday a judge gave the South Jersey couple less than a day to hand over what’s left of the $400,000 they raised through a GoFundMe campaign for Johnny Bobbitt Jr.

On Tuesday, the Philly Inquirer reported that Fallon said he was told the money is all gone.

Fallon said he learned of the missing money in a conference call Tuesday morning with lawyers for Kate McClure and Mark D’Amico, the Burlington County couple accused of mismanaging the money raised for Bobbitt.

“It completely shocked me when I heard,” said Fallon. “It came as a complete surprise to me.”

Word of the missing money came on the same day Bobbitt’s lawyers asked a judge to impose sanctions on the couple after the pair missed a court-ordered deadline to hand over the remaining GoFundMe money.

The couple told the Inquirer and Daily News last month that about $200,000 of the money remained. The balance, they said, had been spent to help Bobbitt. Bobbitt’s attorneys say he has received closer to $75,000, including the cost of the camper and an SUV, both since sold.

D’Amico admitted spending $500 of the GoFundMe money to gamble at SugarHouse Casino, but he said he paid it back with his winnings.

Jacqueline Promislo, one of Bobbitt’s three pro bono lawyers, said in a phone interview as they mulled further legal action: “We’re really concerned about the flight risk.” The lawyers asked the judge to issue sanctions requiring D’Amico and McClure to remain in New Jersey, surrender their passports, post a bond, and be barred from spending any money in their bank accounts.

According to the application for sanctions, D’Amico and McClure failed to comply with the court’s 24-hour deadline “without explanation or request for extension.”

GoFundMe spokesman Bobby Withorne said Tuesday that the company had deposited $20,000 into the escrow account created by Bobbitt’s attorneys to provide assistance for him while an investigation into the case proceeds. The Inquirer reports that Fallon said the $20,000 will be used for six months of housing and food for Bobbitt.

“We are working with law enforcement officials to ensure Johnny receives all of the funds raised on his behalf,” Withorne said.

“While we assist law enforcement with their ongoing investigation, GoFundMe is also working with Johnny’s legal team to ensure he’s receiving support while the remaining funds are being recovered.”

As for donors, if GoFundMe determines that donations were misused, the company says it refunds individual contributions of up to $1,000.

Finally, some potentially good news is that Bobbitt’s legal team says that they were able to enroll their client in a 28-day residential detox program on Monday.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2wWBmXN Tyler Durden

Twitter Permanently Bans Alex Jones, Infowars

One day after Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey appeared before on Capitol Hill to tell lawmakers how his company doesn’t discriminate against conservatives, the company permanently banned Infowars host Alex Jones from the platform.

“Today, we permanently suspended @realalexjones and @infowars from Twitter and Periscope. We took this action based on new reports of Tweets and videos posted yesterday that violate our abusive behavior policy, in addition to the accounts’ previous violations,” the company posted on its Safety account.

Twitter added that it will continue to take further action “regarding other accounts potentially associated” with Jones or Infowars, and will “take action if content that violates our rules is reported or if other accounts are utilized in an attempt to circumvent their ban.” 

Twitter told the Daily Beast that the final straw was a video of Alex Jones berating CNN reporter Oliver Darcey on Wednesday, when he said “Those are the eyes of a rat” to Darcey’s face while accusing CNN of trying to police internet content. 

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2oJEmTv Tyler Durden

CDC Investigating After Multiple Passengers Fall Ill At Philadelphia Airport

One day after 19 passengers fell ill during a JFK flight from Dubai, CBS Philadelphia reports that multiple passengers fell ill on separate international flights coming into Philadelphia International Airport on Thursday. Officials said that 12 passengers arriving at the airport on American Airlines flights from Paris and Munich experienced flu-like symptoms, with multiple ambulances dispatched to the airport.

All 250 passengers and crew on the flights were held for a medical review and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was notified to investigate.

Furthermore, the CDC, Philadelphia Health Department and the Philadelphia Fire Department personnel performed medical evaluations on the passengers.

The passengers who did not fall ill are in the process of being released according to Fox 29. It’s not yet known what caused the people to become sick. No one was transported and no airport operations were impacted.

Airport spokesperson Diane Gerace released the following statement:

“As a precaution, all passengers on the two flights—totaling about 250 plus crew—were held for a medical review and the CDC was notified. CDC, the Philadelphia Health Department, and Philadelphia Fire Department personnel performed medical evaluations and assessments. The passengers—except for the 12 affected—are in the process of being released.”

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2wNamtp Tyler Durden