Deflation Comes Knocking On The Door

Submitted by Alasdair Macleod via GoldMoney.com,

There is little doubt that deflationary risks have increased in recent weeks, if only because the dollar has risen sharply against other currencies.

Understanding what this risk actually is, as opposed to what the talking heads say it is, will be central to financial survival, particularly for those with an interest in precious metals.
The economic establishment associates deflation, or falling prices, with lack of demand. From this it follows that if it is allowed to continue, deflation will lead to business failures and ultimately bank insolvencies due to contraction of bank credit. Therefore, the reasoning goes, demand and consumer confidence must be stimulated to ensure this doesn't happen.

We must bear this in mind when we judge the response to current events. For the moment, we have signs that must be worrying the central banks: the Japanese economy is imploding despite aggressive monetary stimulation, and the Eurozone shows the same developing symptoms. The UK is heavily dependent on trade with the Eurozone and there is a feeling its strong performance is cooling. The chart below shows how all this has translated into their respective currencies since August.

 

Major CCYs vs USD 07112014

Particularly alarming has been the slide in these currencies since mid-October, with the yen falling especially heavily. Given the anticipated effect on US price inflation, we can be sure that if these major currencies weaken further the Fed will act.

Central to understanding the scale of the problem is grasping the enormity of the capital flows involved. The illustration below shows the relationship between non-USD currencies and the USD itself.

 

Total World Money 07112014

The relationship between the dollar's monetary base and global broad money is leverage of over forty times. As Japan and the Eurozone face a deepening recession, capital flows will naturally reverse back into the dollar, which is what appears to be happening today. Economists, who are still expecting economic growth for the US, appear to have been slow to recognise the wider implications for the US economy and the dollar itself.

The Fed, bearing the burden of responsibility for the world's reserve currency, will be under pressure to ease the situation by weakening the dollar. So far, the Fed's debasement of the dollar appears to have been remarkably unsuccessful at the consumer price level, which may encourage it to act more aggressively. But it better be careful: this is not a matter susceptible to fine-tuning.

For the moment capital markets appear to be adapting to deflation piece-meal. Analysts are revising their growth expectations lower for Japan, the Eurozone and China, and suggesting we sell commodities. They have yet to apply the logic to equities and assess the effect on government finances: when they do we can expect government bond yields to rise and equities to fall.

The fall in the gold price is equally detached from economic reality. While it is superficially easy to link a strong dollar to a weak gold price, this line of argument ignores the inevitable systemic and currency risks that arise from an economic slump. The apparent mispricing of gold, equities, bonds and even currencies indicate they are all are ripe for a simultaneous correction, driven by what the economic establishment terms deflation, but more correctly is termed a slump.

 




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1AWwy2P Tyler Durden

Trannies Trounce Small Caps As Bullion, Bonds, & Black Gold Get Battered

Two words tell you all you need to know about today's equity trading… no volume (lowest since Aug27th). The main theme of today – away from stock markets – was to unwind some or all of Friday's moves on the dismal Italy/Greece data: Treasury yields jerked almost 10bps off their lows with 30Y almost retracing the entire Friday rally; The USD rallied, recovering some of its losses from Friday (led by CAD and JPY weakness – which were both stronger Friday); gold and silver were slammed today – almost retracing Friday's gains; and oil prices gave up all their intraday gains to close notably lower. USDJPY and bonds decoupled from stocks which appeared led by a VIX-smashing day, sending the fear index below 12.5. The Dow and S&P closed at all-time highs.

 

 

Spot the volume trend…

 

On the day, Trannies won…

 

But note the reactions in futures… The selloff into the Asian close, the dump-and-pump on the Greece/Italy data (bad news – sell!, wait that's great news – it forces the ECB to act – buy!)… then the US Open was exciting. This is performance from Friday's payroll print… Note – The Nasdaq is red post-Payrolls!

 

VIX dropped below 12.5 and was in charge of stocks today… some tomfoolery at the bell though

 

Quite a roundtrip from Payrolls.

 

 

Treasuries look normal today.. off the Greece/Italy data lows…

 

And The USD surged… off the Greece/Italy data lows

 

And commodities all turned notably lower after the Greece/Italy data…

 

Copper is marginally lower than its pre-payrolls level but WTI is notably lower having tumbled hard today. Gold and Silver sold off but held on to some gains from Friday…

 

Charts: Bloomberg

Bonus Chart: The Decoupling of exuberance…




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1swKgAl Tyler Durden

Banks Rig Gold and Silver Prices? Never !!

Gold Rigging Settlement With UBS – Other Banks To Follow

Suspicions that the price of precious metals are frequently manipulated by a few international banks were further confirmed over the weekend. UBS agreed to settle with various international regulatory bodies investigating rigging in foreign exchange and precious metals markets.



While failing to admit wrongdoing one person familiar with UBS’s internal probe said that the bank found “a small number of potentially problematic incidents at its precious metals desk,” reports the Financial Times:
 

UBS is expected to strike a settlement over alleged trader misbehaviour at its precious metals desks with at least one authority as part of a group deal over forex with multiple regulators this week, two

people close to the situation said. They cautioned that the timing of a precious metals deal could still slip to a date after the forex agreement.

Regulators around the world have alleged that traders at a number of banks have colluded and shared information about client orders to manipulate prices in the $5.3 trillion a day forex market. UBS has previously disclosed that it launched an internal probe of its precious metals business in addition to its forex investigation. It declined to comment for this article.

Unlike at other banks, UBS’s precious metals and forex businesses are closely integrated. The business units have joint management and the bank’s precious metals staff – who mainly trade gold and silver – sit on the same floor as the forex traders.


A small number of problematic incidents in precious metals trading, a small number of problems in forex trading, some problems in LIBOR … It seems that major banks have quite a large amount of small numbers of rigging problems.

While UBS have agreed to settle with regulators, the victims of price manipulation- mining companies and people who have bought precious metals in recent years and incurred financial losses – will receive not a penny. Nor is there any way for them the get to the bottom of what actually occurred.


It is important to remember the context of this settlement. Those who have voiced concerns that precious metals markets are being rigged have been dismissed as conspiracy theorists for years.

The Gold Anti Trust Action Committee or GATA have been very vocal and most prominent in this regard.



Yet, the so called conspiracy ‘theories’ are being proven to be real conspiracies by banks.

Former advisor to President Reagan and Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts pointed out over the weekend how the smashes on precious metals, similar to what happened last week, are executed.


Futures contracts representing vast quantities of gold, up to forty tonnes worth, are dumped onto the electronic futures market over the course of a few minutes. This frequently happens after trading in Asia has finished and Europe is not yet open for business. In other words – at a time when the least amount of traders are available to buy. This guarantees a precipitous fall in the price.


Dr. Roberts quite reasonably surmises that this is an act of blatant manipulation to force prices down.



It smacks of either arrogance or desperation that even as the outcome of investigations by regulatory bodies into the manipulation of gold and silver prices are beginning to be made public such displays of manipulation should occur.

Manipulation can be effective in the short term. However, prices will eventually be dictated by real world forces of supply and demand for physical precious metals. This has been seen throughout history and was seen as recently as the 1960’s and the failure of the London Gold Pool which gave rise to the bull market of the 1970’s.


Acclaimed writer of the Dow Theory letters, Richard Russell observed the strong surge in precious metals prices on Friday and saw it as a positive indicator suggesting further gains are likely.

The sage ninety-year-old and respected writer of one of the oldest investment newsletters in the world, wrote that he thinks “big money sees QE4 ahead and is protecting itself.”


Given the significant macroeconomic, systemic, geopolitical and indeed monetary risks of today, owning physical gold coins and bars as insurance remains prudent and will again reward those who take a long term view.


Access 7 Key Bullion Storage Must Haves here



MARKET UPDATE

Today’s AM fix was USD 1,172.00, EUR 938.20 and GBP 737.25 per ounce.

Friday’s AM fix was USD 1,145.00, EUR 923.39 and GBP 723.17 per ounce.


Gold climbed $31.80 or 2.8% to $1,175.30 per ounce Friday and silver rose $0.29 or 1.88% at $15.74 per ounce. Gold finished up 0.25% for the week and silver finished down 2.60%.


Gold in U.S. Dollars – 1 Year (Thomson Reuters)

Gold surged 3.2% on Friday as market participants adjudged the recent sell off excessive and bought the dip. The gains may have also been due to a short covering rally.

Spot gold was down 0.7% at $1,168.80 an ounce at 1200 GMT. Gold bullion has built on Friday’s gains and is marginally lower this morning after Friday’s sharp gains. Friday’s U.S. payrolls data was slightly lower than expectations and may contributed to safe haven buying and the gains .


Gold in U.S. Dollars – 10 Year (Thomson Reuters)

Silver was down 0.6% at $15.68 an ounce, spot platinum was down 0.2% at $1,210.25 an ounce, and spot palladium was down 0.1% at $766.97 an ounce.

Futures trading volume was double the average for the past 100 days for this time of day, Bloomberg data showed.

Possibly the single most important benchmark of global gold demand today remains gold withdrawals from the Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE).



Last week saw a very robust week for Chinese demand despite talk of weak demand and low premiums in China. For the week ending October 31, there were withdrawals of 47.5 tonnes for the week. This means that the world’s largest gold buyer continues to be headed for annual gold demand of some 2,000 tonnes.

Manipulation of markets can work effectively in the short term (see above). However, in the long term prices will be dictated by the global supply and the global demand of 7 billion people, many in Asia who believe in gold as a store of wealth.

Not to mention, sovereign central banks such as the People’s Bank of China and the Russian central bank – who also believe in gold as an important monetary asset.  

Get Breaking News and Updates on the Gold Market Here
 




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1swKgQU GoldCore

Surprise: Obamacare Enrollment 30% Less Than Previously Expected; Spike In 2015 Premiums Imminent

While the small business scourge that is Obamacare may not last very long now that the GOP has full control of Congress, and a scourge it is according even to the Philly Fed itself as per “Obamacare Is A Disaster For Businesses, Philly Fed Finds“…

… there is some hope that its disastrous impacts on the US economy (one has to find the irony that the economic slam in late 2013 and early 2014 was blamed on snow in the winter and not on the US president), may be finally fading.

The reason: according to the WSJ, moments ago the Obama administration revised its estimate for Obamacare enrollment, now saying – with the bruising midterms safely in the rearview mirror – that it expects some 9.9 million people to have coverage through the Affordable Care Act’s insurance exchanges in 2015, millions fewer than outside experts predicted.

Only it’s not even 9.9 million:

Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell said Monday the administration was aiming for 9.1 million paid-up enrollees for 2015, though the range could extend to 9.9 million, according to the agency’s analysis. Ms. Burwell said she respected the work of the Congressional Budget Office and its projections but that she believed HHS figures were based on the best and most up-to-date information.

So really 8 million, or less? Which is great news for the economy as it means less forced wealth redistribution, if less than great news for the administration’s propaganda. Recall that as recently as two months ago this number stood about 30% higher: according to a projection by the Congressional Budget Office, some 13 million Americans were expected to enroll in Obamacare in the coming year. But what’s some 30% between friends? Just blame it on seasonal adjustments. And don’t forget: the US budget deficit needs to soar in the coming years to open the much needed capacity for the Fed to monetize even more debt because everyone who lived through October 15 saw what will happen if the Fed continues to monetize more than 100% of net issuance.

It gets worse, or if one is the US economy, better:

Also diminished is the number of Americans who had private coverage under the law’s marketplaces for 2014. The administration said Monday that around 7.1 million people across the country who picked plans during the current year’s open-enrollment period were still paid up for their coverage. That’s down from the eight million who the administration said had picked plans as of this spring.

So… 1 million down in 9 months: must be even more seasonal adjustments.

And just as everyone suspected in late 2013, the wildly overblown numbers by the administration were just that, because sooner or later, even those getting handouts would have to make a token payment or at least confirm they are legal US residents. They couldn’t.

HHS officials said they had cut off tax credits for December for 120,000 households that hadn’t responded to requests for more information about their income. Another 112,000 people have had their coverage terminated because the federal government couldn’t confirm they were legally residing in the U.S. That number is down slightly from an earlier announcement from the federal government that it was cutting off 116,000 people over immigration and citizenship status issues.

And with Obamacare’s punitive measures having been delayed through 2015 in hopes of “buying” the midterm elections, hopes which now lie crushed in a smoldering heap, next up is the real sticker shocked:

A new window-shopping tool on the federal insurance website that made its debut late Sunday is giving consumers the first glimpse of health-insurance prices for next year. Many people who bought insurance plans through HealthCare.gov will see their premium increase in 2015 unless they are willing to switch insurance carriers.

Changing plans to ones which have far worse deductibles and coverage, which of course is par for the course for anything the government gets its hands on. For everyone else, well: there are higher prices which will more than offset the temporary gas price drop holiday:

Proposed rates filed by insurers with state regulators over the past six months suggested that big carriers that snapped up a lot of customers last year are raising their rates for 2015, and new market entrants and plans that got fewer sign-ups in 2014 are slashing prices in a bid for more market share. The final rates, posted late Sunday on HealthCare.gov, have followed a similar pattern. As a result, most people who bought coverage through the site last year will see their premiums increase for 2015, at the same time that the lowest rate available on the site remains relatively steady.

 

In Tallahassee, Fla., the lowest-cost silver plan available to a 26-year-old nonsmoker for 2014 was sold by Florida Blue, or Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, with a premium of $228 a month. For 2015, the cost would rise about 20% to $273, according to the premium information displayed on HealthCare.gov. The same 26-year-old could pay a $236 monthly premium for a United Healthcare plan that wasn’t available for 2014.

The punchline:

“We are strongly encouraging people to come back to HealthCare.gov,” said Kevin Counihan, chief executive of the site, on Sunday.

And if people don’t come back, do they get an IRS audit?




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1Ema9Z3 Tyler Durden

Dutch ABN AMRO Demands Draghi Buy More, Faster As ECB’s Mersch Flip-Flops

Once again today we see spurious ECB members sending more mixed messages about ECB actions in the near future (and really only impacting precious metals by the look of it. Having said just a month ago that ECB QE would only be undertaken in strict adherence with mandates and treaties, and warning that QE would strain the ECB's risk-bearing ability; today Luxembourger announced that ABS QE would start next week and Sovereign QE is an option if things get worse. One bank, at least, will be overjoyed… as ABN AMRO wrote this morning that that the ECB needs to bid more aggressively for covered bonds to encourage the street to sell to them.

 

Mersche a month ago…

  • *MERSCH SAYS QE ONLY IN STRICT ADHERENCE WITH ECB MANDATE
  • *MERSCH: QE WOULD STRAIN RISK-BEARING ABILITY OF BALANCE SHEET

And today, his memory seems short…

  • *MERSCH SAYS ABS PURCHASES WILL START IN A WEEK
  • *MERSCH SAYS SOVEREIGN QE OPTION IF SITUATION DETERIORATES
  • *MERSCH SAYS GOVERNMENT-BOND PURCHASES ARE OPTION IF NEEDED
  • *MERSCH SAYS MONETARY POLICY CAN ONLY BUY TIME FOR REFORMS
  • *MERSCH SAYS ECB HAS EXHAUSTED ROOM TO CUT INTEREST RATES

 

And today, as Bloomberg reportsm, ABN demands the ECB pay up…

ECB needs to bid for covered bonds more aggressively in order to continue to buy significant amounts in secondary market, Joost Beaumont, analyst at ABN AMRO, writes in client note.

Estimates  suggest ECB bought just EU400m/day of covered bonds on secondary market last week vs EU600m daily avg in first two weeks of program.

Slowdown in secondary activity reflects scarce availability of paper due to negative net supply and difficulty in convincing investors to sell bonds

EU7.4b of purchases exceeds ABN’s initial expectations

If central bank becomes more aggressive, impact on spreads likely to become more pronounced

ECB may need to cut EU1t balance sheet expansion target, Credit Suisse analysts said earlier

*  *  *

Roughly translated is: "we front-ran your program based on entirely non-economic rationales and now it's "fuck you, pay me" time."

 Unintended consequence #34527, "whatever it takes" means buying everything at the worst possible prices and forcing EU taxpayers to carry that over-paying risk.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1ug6XwT Tyler Durden

Do The Lessons Of History No Longer Apply?

Excerpted from John Hussman’s Weekly Market Comment,

Is this time different? I’ve often characterized our approach to the financial markets as a value-conscious, historically-informed, evidence-driven discipline. In recent years, we’ve often been asked whether the world has changed in a way that makes historical evidence an inadequate guide to investing.

In some cases, those learnable regularities can be derived on the basis of clear theoretical relationships that describe how the world works with reasonable accuracy.

For example, every long-term security is fundamentally a claim on a very long-duration stream of cash flows that can be expected to be delivered into the hands of investors over time. For a given stream of expected cash flows and a given current price, we can quickly estimate the long-term rate of return that the security can be expected to achieve (assuming the cash flows are delivered as expected). Likewise, for a given stream of expected cash flows and a “required” long-term rate of return, we can calculate the current price that would be consistent with that long-term rate of return. The failure to understand the inverse relationship between current prices and future returns is why investors frequently argue that rich equity valuations are “justified” by low interest rates, without understanding that they are really saying that dismal future equity returns are perfectly acceptable.

We also observe the very regular tendency for profit margins to increase during economic expansions (presently corporate profits are close to 11% of GDP), and to contract during softer periods. Corporate profits as a share of GDP have always retreated to less than 5.5% in every economic cycle on record, even in recent decades. Since stocks are most reliably priced on the basis of long-term cash flows, and not simply Wall Street’s estimate of next year’s earnings, we find that valuation measures that are either relatively insensitive to profit margin swings, or that correct for their variation over the economic cycle, are much better correlated with actual subsequent market returns than measures such as price/forward operating earnings that don’t do so.

Our valuation concerns don’t rely on any requirement for earnings or profit margins to turn down in the near term. Valuations are a long-term proposition that link the price being paid today to a stream of cash flows that, for the S&P 500, have an effective duration of about 50 years. In evaluating whether “this time is different,” it should be understood that current valuations are “justified” only if 1) the wide historical cyclicality of profits over the economic cycle has been eliminated, 2) the average level of profit margins over the next five decades will be permanently elevated at nearly twice the historical norm, 3) the strong historical advantage of smoothed or margin-adjusted valuation measures over single-year price/earnings measures has vanished, and 4) zero interest rate policies will persist not just for 3 or 4 more years, but for decades while economic growth proceeds at historically normal rates nonetheless. Believe all of that if you wish. Without permanent changes in the way the world works, on valuation measures that are best correlated with actual subsequent market returns, stocks are wickedly overvalued here.

The chart below show several of the measures that have the strongest relationship (correlation near 90%) with actual subsequent 10-year S&P 500 total returns, reflecting data from the Federal Reserve, Standard & Poors, Robert Shiller, and valuation models that we have published over the years.

As of last week, based on a variety of methods, we estimate likely S&P 500 10-year nominal total returns averaging just 1.5% annually over the coming decade, with negative expected returns on every horizon shorter than about 8 years. The chart above shows the historical record of these estimates (in percent) versus actual subsequent 10-year S&P 500 total returns. What’s notable is not only the strong correlation between estimated returns and actual subsequent returns, but also that the errors are informative.

Given the full weight of the evidence, it should be clear that one can’t just say “well, look, the S&P 500 has done better than these models would have projected a decade ago,” and use that as a compelling argument that this time is different and historical regularities no longer hold. Quite the opposite – the overshoot in S&P 500 total returns since 2004 – relative to the prospective returns one would have estimated at the time – is highly informative that stocks are strenuously overvalued at present. That conclusion has strong statistical support. In fact, when we examine the historical evidence, we find that there’s a -68% correlation between the error in the projected return over the past decade and the actual subsequent total return of the S&P 500 in the following decade. That is, the more actual 10-year S&P 500 returns exceeded the return that was projected, the worse the S&P 500 generally did over the next 10 years. Notably, the “Fed Model” has a correlation of less than 48% with actual subsequent 10-year returns. It’s sad when a valuation measure that is so popular is outperformed even by the errors of better measures.

Last week, however, the market re-established conditions extreme enough to place the present instance among what I’ve often called the “who’s who of awful times to invest.” Importantly, and in contrast to a few similarly extreme conditions we’ve seen in recent years, we presently observe both widening credit spreads and – at least for now – deteriorating internals and unfavorable trend uniformity on our measures of market action.

In short, our views will shift as the evidence shifts, but here and now, the market has re-established overvalued, overbought, overbullish conditions that mirror some of the most precarious points in the historical record such as 1929, 1937, 1974, 1987, 2000 and 2007. That syndrome is now coupled with continued evidence of a subtle shift toward more risk-averse investor psychology, primarily reflected by internal dispersion and widening credit spreads. I’ve often emphasized that the worst market outcomes have historically been associated with compressed risk premiums coupled with a shift toward risk aversion among investors. In those environments, risk premiums typically don’t normalize gradually – they do so in abrupt spikes. We’ll continue to respond as the evidence changes, but under current conditions, we view the investment environment for stocks as being among a handful of the most hostile points in history.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1xmTinR Tyler Durden

BofA: “Change Your Thinking On Gold” Friday Marked The End Of A 4 Year Decline

For the week ahead, BofAML’s MacNeil Curry is focused on the plight of the USDollar, US Treasuries, and commodities; especially gold and oil. All of these markets, he warns, are showing signs of changes in trend. Most notably, Curry explains, we are switching gears on gold from bearish to bullish, “Friday’s gains are just the beginning.”

 

Via BofAML’s MacNeil Curry,

Gold: Friday’s gains are just the beginning

 

Change your thinking on Gold.

Friday’s Bullish Reversal / Bullish Engulfing Candle marks the end of a 4yr decline and the beginning of a medium term bull trend.

 

Initial targets are seen to 1241/55 ahead of 1345 and potentially as far as 1433.

Buy dips.

*  *  *

And positioning has shifted to a notable bearish position…

*  *  *

So far no good as gold and silver are giving back Friday’s gains…





via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1wbyi09 Tyler Durden

Broke, Living In A Basement, With “Negative Savings”: This Is What Millennials Spend Their Money On

When work is punished, homes are unaffordable, the American Dream is over, Milennials are burning through their assets or going into debt to survive… So just what is it that they are spending their hard-signed-up-for-benefits money on? We have the answer: Kim Kardashian: Hollywood, the freemium app in which you climb up to the A-list next to Kim Kardashian, made $43.4 million in Q3.

 

As Vulture.com reports,

She hasn’t hit the projected $200 million just yet (and might not), but Glu Games just announced that Kim K’s iPhone game, Kim Kardashian Hollywood, took in $43.4 million in Q3.

 

According to the earnings call, the infamous game has been downloaded almost 23 million times and played for almost 6 billion minutes.

*  *  *

Source: DailyDot

*  *  *

Is it any wonder, with all this ‘game-playing’ the average American needs to spend less time working and more time sleeping…

 

*  *  *

Distract, distract, distract…




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1tUYnCn Tyler Durden