Why Fracking Will Never Be Banned In The US

Why Fracking Will Never Be Banned In The US

Authored by Julianne Geiger via OilPrice,com,

Several democratic presidential candidates have proposed fracking bans, but oil companies have room to breathe easily knowing that killing off fracking in the US is a bit too big of a bite for any political party to handle.

But as environmental issues continue to remain front and center in the media, fracking has become a rather easy target that offers political candidates a juicy platform from which they can woo voters. 

But is their plan to ban fracking really feasible? And doesn’t the American shale patch already have enough – and bigger – enemies?

Fracking Explained

Fracking–also called hydraulic fracturing–is a drilling process that involves injecting a high-pressure mixture containing water, sand, and chemicals into shale rock, which fractures the rock and releases the oil and gas that is trapped inside. The process often involves horizontal drilling.

The Benefits of Fracking

The benefits of fracking are numerous. In the United States, the introduction of fracking has completely turned the energy industry upside down, increasing the amount of oil and gas produced in the US “faster than at any time in its history,” according to the EIA, and increasing America’s energy independence in the process. Fracking has also brought down energy prices. Environmentally speaking, fracking has managed to lower carbon emissions by displacing a fair amount of carbon-intensive coal, which is now on the skids. 

The entire country is a beneficiary of the fracking boom, without question. And today, 95% of all wells drilled in the US are fracked, according to the API.

The Problem with Fracking

Nevertheless, fracking has its drawbacks, and environmentalists–and the Democratic party that serves them–have singled out fracturing as a one-dimensional evil that must be stopped, at all costs.

The argument against fracking is that the process of fracturing the earth to release tight oil causes earthquakes. The other argument is that injecting chemicals into the earth is polluting nearby aquifers. Both issues have long been debated.

All Aboard the Anti-Fracking Movement!

If you’re a Democrat of the far-left leaning variety, you’re likely already on the anti-fracking train. Political candidates such as Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren–the latter of whom is no longer in the running for President–jumped on board early and were extremely vocal against fracking. 

That leaves Sanders, who is also having a bit of trouble in the polls, as the anti-fracking movement’s best champion. 

“Any proposal to avert the climate crisis must include a full fracking ban on public and private lands,” Sanders tweeted last September. 

Sanders even teamed up with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and others to propose a federal bill to “phase out” fracking nationwide, known as the Ban Fracking Act. The act would start with banning new federal permits for fracking-related infrastructure immediately. Then, by 2021, fracking within 2500 feet of homes and schools would be banned. By 2025, the act would ban fracking in the United States completely, according to Sanders’ website

But some have argued that neither Sanders nor Warren understands the issue of fracking.

It is also possible that neither Sanders nor Warren fully understands the implications of standing on a platform that would seek to ban fracking.

But what would a fracking ban mean?

The Wrath of the States

A nationwide ban aside, which federally would be problematic as the states are the ones that regulate fracking, fracking-dependent states may not be too excited to endorse a candidate–democratic or not–who opposes fracking outright.

First, Pennsylvania, an important swing state, has enjoyed sucking off the fracking teat, much like it sucks off the coal teat. Democrats tried to take an anti-coal stance there during the last presidential election, but failed to win over the swing state, with Pennsylvania residents opting instead for the more fiscally minded “Trump digs coal” stance. Any anti-fracking candidates will struggle to swing this state back into blue territory. 

Colorado, too, may prove challenging for candidates heralding the benefits of a fracking ban. Although a purple state, Big Oil has managed to do quite well here with quashing anti-oil ballot proposals in the past. Voters were asked in 2018 to weigh the merits of increased setbacks for oil and gas wells, which would have taken a significant portion of land off the table for oil and gas drilling. The environmentally friendly measure, however, was defeated.

But Sanders managed to win the Democratic primary in Colorado taking this unforgiving stance, despite the fact that the American Petroleum Institute said a fracking ban would mean a loss of more than 350,000 jobs in Colorado. 

New Mexico, too, would take a severe beating from any ban on its bread and butter activity of fracking. According to a study from the US Chamber of Commerce’s Global Energy Institute found that a fracking ban could cost the state nearly 16% of its workforce and cut away $86 billion in cumulative GDP through 2025. 

Is it Even Feasible?

CNN recently provided a fracking ban “fact check”, pointing out that banning fracking would require an act of Congress. A president without Congress could maybe ban it on federal lands, but private-land fracking would take more oomph than a president has. 

Yes, a president could make fracking on private lands a far more difficult endeavor, but Big Oil (and the API) has already proven a worthy foe over other anti-oil legislation, and Big Oil’s win is near certainly. Warren and Sanders are unlikely to be in the dark on this near-certain outcome.

Fracking regulations on federal lands have already been proposed in the past but were consequently ruled unlawful. 

Like Sanders and Warren, surely the API must know that any full-on fracking ban proposal is a no-go. Still, the API is already putting on the gloves to go another round, with a passionate campaign to bring to light what it considers to be a devastating effect on the US energy industry and the whole economy. 

A Far Greater Nemesis

A far greater foe to fracking than any political candidate would be the market itself–the coronavirus and OPEC’s complete failure to reach a deal with Russia over production cuts have sent oil prices falling to scary lows. These low prices are likely the only immediate thing that the US fracking industry has to worry about at the moment. 


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/13/2020 – 11:49

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2w3JoS3 Tyler Durden

Unprecedented NAV Discounts In Credit ETFs Underscore “Dash For Cash” Panic

Unprecedented NAV Discounts In Credit ETFs Underscore “Dash For Cash” Panic

Less than two months ago, Ray Dalio came out with what may have been the worst market “hot take” in history when he said that “cash is trash” just weeks before the biggest market crash in generations and the biggest scramble into the safety of cash on record.

And besides risk assets themselves, noweher was this dash for cash more evident than what we saw over the past few days in ETFs. SaxoBank’s Peter Garnry explains:

Summary: ETFs tracking credit are trading at large discounts to NAV showing the intense stress and breakdowns in one of the key markets for retail investors and large financial institutions doing asset allocation. If confidence rises enough due to the Fed’s liquidity provisions yesterday and several short selling bans, and market makers have the risk capital available then we could see a big rise in credit today as these discounts are being close. So far equities have responded to policy action with Euro STOXX 50 futures up 7% from the recent lows. 

* * *

Events in markets are dramatic and in one corner underpinning main retail portfolios the stress is extreme. Passive investment vehicles such as ETFs are seeing disorderly price action with market makers posting wide bid-offer spreads but more importantly the traded prices are significantly below the actually NAV (net-asset-values) of the ETF fund. One of the ETFs we use in our tactical asset allocation is tracking global inflation-linked government bonds. The ETF closed yesterday with a 4.2% discount between the NAV and the last traded price. Almost every credit ETF in the US and Europe shows same stress. These discounts reflect that market makers cannot commit risk capital to arbitrage way this spread, but also risk aversion and general precautionary principles due to the massive uncertainty around those NAV values. The seeds are there for a massive rebound in credit bonds and the ETFs tracking them. But it requires more two-way flow by investors (one-side right now) and market makers willing to commit risk capital to close the discount.

Yesterday’s events will go down in the history books as one of the most violent trading days with clear liquidity disappearing from markets and a historic policy mistake in Europe. The S&P 500 cash index closed down 9.5% and the Europe STOXX 600 cash index closed down 11.5%. It all started with Trump’s horrible speech and travel ban Wednesday night which was followed up by probably one of the worst ECB meetings ever on par with Trichet’s massive rate hike blunder in 2011.

Yesterday was supposed to have been the big rescue day but ended up with Europe failing to deliver in terms of speed and size as we have gotten used to over the years. All eyes are now on Germany to open up the purse and allow deficits to increase dramatically to offset the economic pain from COVID-19 and credit market stress which will hit economic growth. The world needs a global coordinated action but the chance is little so policymakers and markets will be in a tug-of-war for some time, but eventually the policy response will equate the economic impact and markets will find its low.

The Fed did on the other hand deliver yesterday to save the money market and indirectly the hedge funds doing relative arbitrage with high leverage in the US Treasury market which uses the repo market for these strategies. The Fed’s liquidity provisions will hopefully stabilize credit markets and convince financial firms to commit risk capital to close obvious gaps across Treasuries and credit bonds. In addition several countries such as the UK, Spain, Italy and South Korea have all issued short selling bans which seems to be working today to increase confidence. Euro STOXX 50 futures are up 7% from the recent lows. But be aware that its Friday and many active funds don’t want too much risk into the weekend as these have proven bad for risk with Monday gaps as the market is digesting incoming COVID-19 numbers.


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/13/2020 – 11:31

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/38L59n6 Tyler Durden

First Emergency POMO Oversubscribed As Fed’s “Whatever It Takes” Moment Arrives

First Emergency POMO Oversubscribed As Fed’s “Whatever It Takes” Moment Arrives

The result of the Fed’s first emergency POMO is out.

Less than half an hour after the NY Fed announced it would conduct six emergency POMOs staggered across the entire day on Friday, and amounting to a total of $37 billion in securities across the curve from 0 to 30 years, as per the following schedule:

  • 20 to 30 year sector at 10:30 – 10:45 am and 2:15 to 2:45 pm for around $4 billion each
  • 7 to 20 year sector at 11:15 – 11:30 am  for around $5 billion
  • 4.5 to 7 year sector at 12:00 – 12:15 pm for around $8 billion
  • 2.25 to 4.5 year sector at 12:45 – 1:00 pm for around $8 billion
  • 0 to 2.25 year sector at 1:30 – 1:45 pm for around $8 billion

… moments ago we got the result of the first POMO which targeted TSY bonds in the 20-30 year sector, and which not surprisingly was oversubscribed with $5.384BN in securities submitted for sale to the Fed, of which the maximum, or $3.999 billion was accepted.

Expect five more POMOs today, with another 20-30 year operation concluding at 2:45pm today – that much is known. What is not known is whether the Fed will be successful in calming the unprecedented lack of liquidity that is haunting what until this week was the world’s deepest and most liquid market in the world. 

If it can’t, it will get awkward especially since as BMO Capital Markets’ rates strategist Jon Hill says, the Fed’s move to buy bonds all the way out to the 30-year maturity is the central bank’s “whatever it takes” moment.

“The Fed is obviously deeply concerned about Treasury market functioning and is willing to do whatever it takes to try to backstop,” Hill told Bloomberg in a call, pointing out that including cheapest-to-deliver securities – i.e., those which are targeted by RV funds, is notable as it shows policy makers adapting to circumstances on the fly to provide support.

What he really meant, is that what the Fed is doing is bailing out those macro funds which have put on Treasury basis trades on, and which without the Fed’s liquidity, would end up a catastrophic cascade of LTCM-like disasters, something we first explained in December in “”The Fed Was Suddenly Facing Multiple LTCMs”: BIS Offers A Stunning Explanation Of What Really Happened On Repocalypse Day.”


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/13/2020 – 11:10

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3aMGZKa Tyler Durden

Will The Coronavirus Kill The New World Order?

Will The Coronavirus Kill The New World Order?

Authored by Patrick Buchanan via Buchanan.org,

Dr. Brian Monahan, attending physician of Congress, told a closed meeting of Senate staffers this week that 70 million to 150 million Americans – a third of the nation – could contract the coronavirus. Dr. Anthony Fauci testified that the mortality rate for COVID-19 will likely run near 1%.

Translation: Between 750,000 and 1.1 million Americans may die of this disease before it runs its course. The latter figure is equal to all the U.S. dead in World War II and on both sides in the Civil War.

Chancellor Angela Merkel warns that 70% of Germany’s population — 58 million people — could contract the coronavirus. If she is right, and Fauci’s mortality rate holds for her country, that could mean more than half a million dead Germans.

Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis called Merkel’s remark “unhelpful” and said it could cause panic. But Harvard epidemiologist Marc Lipsitch seemed to support Merkel, saying between 40% and 70% of the world’s population could become infected.

Again, if Fauci’s 1% mortality rate and Lipsitch’s estimate prove on target, between 3 billion and 5 billion people on earth will be infected, and 30 million to 50 million will die, a death toll greater than that of the Spanish Flu of 1918.

There is, however, some contradictory news.

China, with 81,000 cases, has noted a deceleration in new cases and South Korea appears to be gradually containing the spread of the virus.

Yet, Italy, with its large elderly population, may be a harbinger of what is to come in the West.

As of Thursday, Italy had reported 12,000 cases and 827 deaths, a mortality rate of nearly 7%. This suggests that the unreported and undetected infections in shutdown Italy are far more numerous.

In the U.S., the death toll at this writing is 39, a tiny fraction of the annual toll of tens of thousands who die of the flu.

But the problem is this: COVID-19 has not nearly run its course in the USA, while the reaction in society and the economy approaches what we might expect from a boiling national disaster.

The stock market has plunged further and faster than it did in the Great Crash of 1929. Trillions of dollars in wealth have vanished. If Sen. Bernie Sanders does not like “millionaires and billionaires,” he should be pleased. There are far fewer of them today than there were when he won the New Hampshire primary.

What does the future hold?

It may one day be said that the coronavirus delivered the deathblow to the New World Order, to a half-century of globalization, and to the era of interdependence of the world’s great nations.

Tourism, air travel, vacation cruises, international gatherings and festivals are already shutting down. Travel bans between countries and continents are being imposed. Conventions, concerts and sporting events are being canceled. Will the Tokyo Olympics go forward? If they do, will all the anticipated visitors from abroad come to Japan to enjoy the games?

Trump has issued a one-month travel ban on Europe.

As for the “open borders” crowd, do Democrats still believe that breaking into our country should no longer be a crime, and immigrants arriving illegally should be given free health care, a proposition to which all the Democratic debaters raised their hands?

The ideological roots of our free trade era can be traced to the mid-19th century when its great evangelist, Richard Cobden, rose at Free Trade Hall in Manchester on Jan. 15, 1846, and rhapsodized:

“I see in the Free Trade principle that which shall act on the moral world as the principle of gravitation in the universe — drawing men together, thrusting aside the antagonism of race, and creed, and language, and uniting us in the bonds of eternal peace.”

In the pre-Trump era, Republicans held hands with liberal Democrats in embracing NAFTA, GATT, the WTO and most-favored-nation trade privileges for China.

In retrospect, was it wise to have relied on China to produce essential parts for the supply chains of goods vital to our national security? Does it appear wise to have moved the production of pharmaceuticals and lifesaving drugs for heart disease, strokes and diabetes to China? Does it appear wise to have allowed China to develop a virtual monopoly on rare earth minerals crucial to the development of weapons for our defense?

In this coronavirus pandemic, people now seem to be looking for authoritative leaders and nations seem to be looking out for their own peoples first. Would Merkel, today, invite a million Syrian refugees into Germany no matter the conditions under which they were living in Syria and Turkey?

Is not the case now conclusive that we made a historic mistake when we outsourced our economic independence to rely for vital necessities upon nations that have never had America’s best interests at heart?

Which rings truer today? We are all part of mankind, all citizens of the world. Or that it’s time to put America and Americans first!


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/13/2020 – 11:10

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2WaoZVX Tyler Durden

BMO: “The Disconnect Between Treasuries And Stocks Is The Most Widely Debated Topic At The Moment”

BMO: “The Disconnect Between Treasuries And Stocks Is The Most Widely Debated Topic At The Moment”

Authored by Ian Lyngen, Ben Jeffery and Jon Hill, rates stretegists at BMO Capital Markets

A sense of uncomfortable calm has fallen on financial markets overnight following the Fed’s announcement of additional liquidity measures and the PBOC’s drop of the RRR. This isn’t to suggest the price action has been nil; in fact, the curve is steeper with 30-year yields bouncing as high at 1.788% in a sharp reversal of the long bond’s outperformance. Rather, the move might best be characterized as a continuation of the profit-taking and cash-raising trend which has emerged in recent days. In a return to the traditional response to an easing Fed, the steepening of the curve appears to finally be taking hold as 2s/10s reached 45.5 bp overnight and the technical profile shows ample room for further extension. With 10-year yields at 85 bp this morning, the disconnect between the massive selloff in domestic equities and incrementally bearish tone for Treasuries is one of the most widely debated topics at the moment.

It’s far too glib to conclude that ‘markets are broken’ despite how tempting such an observation may be; Treasuries are faced with constrained liquidity and an unwillingness on the part of market makers to step-up risk-taking. This is the exact type of environment in which one would expect investors to step back and allow the repricing to run its course. The anomaly is the magnitude of the dislocations; volatility has spiked as evidenced by the MOVE index which is once again above 150. In more liquid times, we would have anticipated the price discovery process to be more orderly and observe that the longer end of the curve (10s and 30s) has historically traded off global macro expectations of growth and inflation. Flows and supply have become uncharacteristically large drivers in determining the outright level of yields.

Our expectations are for the elevated relevance of positioning to ultimately prove a temporary nuance of a much larger overall repricing; however, for the moment it would be folly to dismiss the liquidity constraints recently revealed in Treasuries as simply noise. As with the movements in global equities, the price action in US rates could transition from ‘reflecting’ a change in investor sentiment to ‘causing’ a material adjustment of macro expectations. Said differently, enough carnage and uncertainty in markets will create the degree of financial losses that can materially define the banking sector – and not in a good way.

The Fed’s primary objective in easing monetary policy in response to the coronavirus was always to provide a bridge of accessible funding to banks and businesses during a period in which corporate profitability will undoubtedly be strained. By pushing down borrowing costs, the objective is to allow/incentivize firms to avoid layoffs as the go-to tool for shoring up the bottom line. This week’s price action has been especially concerning in the context of what it implies for the financial sector as a whole; there are only so many losses that can be papered-over by cheap funding. The labor force will sustain damage from the events of the first quarter, Powell’s objective now is surely to limit the fallout and avoid longer-lasting declines in consumer confidence.

The Fed funds futures market has convincingly priced in another 100 bp of FOMC cuts by next Wednesday’s meeting as the April 2020 contract is trading with an implied rate of 16.5 bp. Technically, this isn’t completely pricing in a 100 bp (that would require a 9 bp rate); nonetheless, it’s close enough for government bond work. There is a contingent in the market anticipating that yesterday’s drop in domestic equities will prove sufficient to warrant another intermeeting ease; this round a full point. This is a distinct possibility as concerns continue to migrate from stocks into credit products as the coronavirus leads to greater state and local government responses. We’re unwilling to dismiss the prospects for an emergency cut ahead of the weekend, after all it’s Friday the 13th, what could go wrong?


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/13/2020 – 10:52

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2Qe4zaR Tyler Durden

NYC Mulls Unprecedented Scaling Back Of Subway Service As Ridership Plummets 

NYC Mulls Unprecedented Scaling Back Of Subway Service As Ridership Plummets 

As of mid-week New York City Subway ridership sank about 20% over coronavirus fears, prompting the Metropolitan Transportation Authority to begin consider scaling back operations which see 5.5 million people ride each weekday. Depending on the potential extent, it would be a historic first: “Subway service in New York City could be scaled back as the novel coronavirus outbreak leads to falling ridership, a Metropolitan Transportation Authority official said Thursday,” WSJ reports.

Simultaneously cyclists and people walking to their jobs on foot have been on a noticeable rise though much of New York is grinding to a halt, with public event cancellations coming fast and furious on Thursday, after Gov. Andrew Cuomo issued an edict banning large gatherings across the state (of 500 people or more). And in NYC everything from Broadway to the Metropolitan Museum of Art and other frequented spots have been shuttered, though controversially most high schools remain open – with closures based on confirmed or suspected Covid-19 cases, after Mayor Bill de Blasio officially declared a state of emergency Thursday.

Crowded Grand Central subway station, file image via AP.

Currently, the subway system is running as normal, despite the mayor previously comparing the outbreak to a ‘war-time’ situation. “We are getting into a situation where the only analogy is war,” he said.

The mayor is reportedly committed to keeping public transit open, despite growing criticism over the choices being made:

New York will look to keep those vital institutions running at all costs, the mayor said, though he continues to face calls to shutter schools.

For now, MTA officials have simply urged subway commuters to avoid crowded cars and to stagger their rides. And yet with the plummeting numbers they could eventually be forced to begin reducing operations, facing greater pressure from the public.

At the start of the week Metropolitan Transportation Authority chairman and CEO Pat Foye said the trains “remain safe” but still recommended for those with underlying health issues, “If you can get around without riding the subway, do it.”

With the overall 20% drop in ridership, some lines have seen a staggering near half drop in riders, per the WSJ:

The spokesman said ridership on the MTA’s two commuter rail systems, the Long Island Rail Road and Metro-North Railroad, was down 31% and 48%, respectively, during Thursday morning’s rush hour, compared with a similar rush hour last year. The state had 328 confirmed cases of the virus as of Thursday afternoon, including 95 in the city, state officials said.

The MTA is considering service reductions for buses and some commuter railroads, however, to give an idea of just how monumental a subway closure or even reduction would be, it must be remembered that it hasn’t closed in over a century.

The WSJ points out: “The subway system has never shut down because of a health scare. But its 100-plus-year history is scattered with dayslong closures because of storms, labor strikes and blackouts.”

So if we do reach the point to where the MTA actually moves toward unprecedented reductions or even closure, this would most certainly be a ‘canary in the coal mine’ moment signalling to the rest of the country just how bad this could get – as in China and Italy levels of outbreak.


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/13/2020 – 10:50

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3cPdRDU Tyler Durden

President Bolsonaro Tests Positive After Dining With Trump Saturday: Brazilian Press

President Bolsonaro Tests Positive After Dining With Trump Saturday: Brazilian Press

It’s official: Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro has tested positive for coronavirus, making him the highest ranking political leader in the world to get Covid-19 thus far.

It was first reported Thursday that Bolsonaro was being monitored and tested, after his press secretary Fabio Wajngarten had tested positive for the virus.

Crucially Bolsonaro along with his aide met with Donald Trump when the Brazilian delegation traveled to Mar-a-Lago on 7 March, with Bolsonaro reportedly having more contact with Trump than this aide, including a Saturday evening dinner at the resort.

Presidents Trump and Bolsonaro dining last Saturday at Mar-a-Lago, via the AP.

Local Brazilian media reports Bolsonaro will undergo a second COVID-19 test to confirm the first.

On Thursday some unconfirmed local reports began saying Bolsonaro had tested positive, but other sources denied what appeared premature speculation.

Journalist Glenn Greenwald writes of Friday’s breaking Brazilian newspaper reports: “A reasonably reliable Brazilian newspaper is reporting, based on sources with first-hand knowledge inside the presidential palace, that Bolsonaro’s first test was positive for COVID-19.” He added that “A second more reliable test was performed; results available today.”

The Brazilian president’s office has yet to comment on or confirm the new reporting early Friday.

Likely this means the US president himself will now be closely monitored and tested, if not already.

developing…


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/13/2020 – 10:37

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2IIlTAH Tyler Durden

‘Rohrkrepierer’ – How The Fed’s Giant Bazooka Misfired

‘Rohrkrepierer’ – How The Fed’s Giant Bazooka Misfired

Via GoldMoney.com,

The Germans – as always – have a word for it: Rohrkrepierer. Literally translated it means “[projectile] that explodes in the barrel before it exits the weapon”. This is a perfect analogy for what happened when the Fed took out what it felt was the financial Bazooka, just to see equities implode on the close (see Exhibit 1). More specifically, the NY fed today announced a massive expansion of its repo facility by a staggering 1.5 trillion $ over 2 days. The Fed also announced it would start purchasing coupon Treasuries as part of its POMO operations.

As of today, the S&P500 is down 26.7% from the peak, surpassing the -20% threshold that is usually associated with a bear market. What is staggering though, is the speed at which this happened. It took the S&P500 just 16 trading days to do so. The previous record was set by no other stock market crash than that of 1929 with 30 trading days. In other words, the current equity market crash has been twice as fast as the mother of all crashes in 1929.

The below chart shows the S&P500 performance of every bear market since 1929. There are three events that stand out: 1929, 1987 (the infamous Black Monday on 19 October 1987) and now 2020.

The chart is not exclusive to US equity markets, stock indices around the world are showing a similar picture. Asian markets have shown similar declines over the past 3 weeks, but because they have been in decline for a while, the peak to bottom time has been significantly increased.

So why are we seeing such a rapid decline in stock prices? One could easily point to the Coronavirus outbreak and determine that this causes an unprecedented economic impact to a highly interlinked global economy. Ultimately, this may be true. We don’t know yet.

We would argue however, that equity markets have been ripe for a significant correction for a long time and that the Coronavirus is just the event that triggered it. We expect markets to continue to correct even if  the Coronavirus threat were to dissipate over the coming weeks, be it because lockdown measures globally show results, or be it because hotter summer temperatures mean that the spread of the virus is slowed down dramatically.

The root of the current market crash lies much deeper. Central bank interventions have propped up asset markets to record valuation, by almost any measure. At the same time, it has hollowed out the real economy. Artificially low interest rates have led to massive capital misallocation. The US shale oil industry is one such example, where producers with very high operating costs and no means of generating sustainable profits have been showered by inventors and banks with money, which kept them going for much longer than what should have been possible in a normal investment environment. With the oil market crash, this comes suddenly to an end. Investors and creditors will have to write down hundreds of billions of dollars over the coming months. We expect other industries to follow. There are serious consequences for credit markets on the horizon.

One thing we think is certain: Despite today’s misfire, central banks will continue to try to solve the problem by flooding the market with money. Interest rates will be slashed to even more negative territory. Quantitative easing will accelerate and central banks will likely come up with new ideas how to prevent a credit meltdown and stimulate demand. All that will be good for gold prices.

Fortunately, gold prices have been held back, by rapidly declining energy prices…

…rapidly declining inflation expectations…

…and what we believe is liquidation to cover margin calls on long asset positions. We say fortunately, because it allows savers around the world to still buy gold despite the asset meltdown over the past week. We expect much higher gold prices over the medium term and will write about this in an upcoming report.


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/13/2020 – 10:36

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/39OVZHu Tyler Durden

Spain Declares National Emergency As PM Warns ‘We Could Have 10,000 Cases By Next Week’: Live Updates

Spain Declares National Emergency As PM Warns ‘We Could Have 10,000 Cases By Next Week’: Live Updates

Update (1030ET): A flashing-red headline from BBG just declared that Spain is announcing a national state of emergency over the outbreak, as the number of confirmed cases in Madrid soars amid a rash of deaths.

Socialist Spanish PM Pedro Sanchez said that he isn’t ruling out the possibility that there will be more than “100,000 cases of coronavirus in Spain” as early as next week.

Trudeau plans to address the nation at noon ET, presumably to discuss the situation with him and his wife. In the mean time, the Canadian Parliament has been suspended for the time being.

Brazil’s government denied these rumors last night, but reports have persisted, and now the Guardian is reporting that Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro has tested positive for Covid-19. His communications secretary tested positive earlier this week, raising questions about whether President Trump and VP Pence were exposed.

Switzerland is reportedly planning to reintroduce “checks” at all borders, after blocking Italians from entering earlier this week, as infections inside the country has started to accelerate.

*  *  *

Update (1022ET): The most prestigious golf tournament in America has just postponed play because of the coronavirus outbreak.

The 2020 Masters Tournament has been postponed due to “ever-increasing risks associated with the widespread coronavirus,” Augusta National Golf Club announced.

“Respecting the health and well-being of everyone associated with these events and the citizens of the Augusta community, the 2020 Masters Tournament, the Augusta National Women’s Amateur and the Drive, Chip and Putt National Finals have been postponed,” Chairman Fred Ridley said in a statement.

The tournament was initially scheduled for April 9-12. It’s not clear when play will begin.

The Boston Marathon has also been postponed until Sept. 14, according to a statement from its organizers.

*  *  *

It’s been another crazy morning around the world as more sports leagues suspended play and governments – most notably Germany  – pledged to whip out their credit cards and spend whatever might be necessary to soften the economic blow, a chorus of reassurance that has helped to drive markets back to limit-up.

Following reports last night that Arsenal’s manager and a Chelsea player had both tested positive for the virus, the Premier League decided during an emergency meeting Friday morning that it would suspend play. Now, the Champions League, Premier League and Europa League have all been suspended because of the virus.

Indian Public health authorities confirmed the first virus-related death in the world’s second-most populous country on Friday. Fewer than 100 cases have been confirmed across the country, and dozens who came into contact with the man have been quarantined. But the government’s inability to safely quarantine and treat the now-deceased patient was hardly encouraging.

After closing its border with Italy, Austria has cancelled international flights to/from Spain, France and Italy and is reportedly weighing a wider border closure. Nearby, the Czech Republic is planning to close its borders, and people won’t be allowed to leave the country. In the Balkans, Slovakia has closed its borders completely.

The FDA has launched a 24/7 hotline for patients worried about their infections status. In Washington, President Trump and VP Mike Pence have both decided not to be tested, in accordance with their physicians’ advice since neither are showing symptoms, despite both having come into contact with the infected or potentially infected.

After we reported yesterday that Trump shook hands and ate dinner with a Brazilian official who turned out to be infected, the Washington Post reports that an Australian government minister who just tested positive for the virus met with Ivanka Trump and AG William Barr, as well as a handful of other Washington officials.

In a statement, Aussie Minister Peter Dutton said that he woke up on Friday morning “with a temperature and sore throat” and was “subsequently tested for COVID-19.” Dutton was advised by Queensland Health that his tests returned positive on Friday afternoon. Dutton had met with Trump, Barr, Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway and Director of the Domestic Policy Council Joe Grogan in Washington a week ago when Aussie PM Scott Morrison visited the White House for the first time.

As individuals try to gauge their infection risk, scientists have found that the coronavirus can stay infectious for days on some surfaces. Researchers have also now confirmed that the coronavirus can be contagious in the body before symptoms appear.

Across the US, nearly every state has diagnosed at least one case of the virus, while more than 1,600 cases of the virus are being treated across the US, including at least one patient in nearly every state and the District of Columbia. At least 41 deaths have been reported in the country as public life appears to be grinding to a halt.

WaPo

Washington DC has joined Seattle and Houston in closing its schools, while Michigan, Mexico and Oregon followed Maryland and Ohio by shuttering their schools. These closures will take effect Monday, and last until the end of March, or beginning on April.

“We are going to do what we have to do. We are in a crisis,” Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine said. Closures in Ohio will begin at the close of classes Monday and run through at least April 3, DeWine said. “It may be a lot longer.”

“This is a necessary step to protect our kids, our families, and our overall public health,” said Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in a statement released on Friday.

In New Mexico, Ryan Stewart, the state’s public education secretary, described the closures as a “proactive measure” to limit the potential community spread of the virus.

And while Oregon had worked hard to keep schools open, student absences and issues with staff have made it “impossible to functionally operate schools,” Gov. Kate Brown.

Kentucky stopped short of a mandatory order and “recommended” that schools should be closed. In California, Sacramento and San Francisco have also closed schools.

Meanwhile, back in China, all 42 Apple stores have reopened.

After Trump’s “misstatements” on Wednesday helped trigger one of the worst trading sessions on Wall Street since the crisis, the White House announced a series of steps on Friday aimed at boosting the availability of coronavirus testing, one of the most heavily-criticized aspects of the government’s response.

According to WSJ, a new, high-speed coronavirus test has been granted emergency approval by the FDA in a desperate attempt to expand testing capacity for the pathogen.

To facilitate testing, the FDA has created a 24-hour emergency hotline for laboratories having difficulty getting materials or finding other impediments to running tests, according to announcements early on Friday. The FDA has also authorized more private labs in NY State to conduct the tests, per CNN.

Officials also announced they would be doling out nearly $1.3 million in federal money to two companies trying to develop rapid Covid-19 tests that could have accurate results within an hour.

In Italy – not Iran – the president of the Medical Guild of Varese, Roberto Stella, has died of coronavirus at the age of 67. Stella died on Tuesday in Como, Italy, after being hospitalized following his diagnosis. He’s the first high-level public health official in Italy to succumb to the virus.

In a statement, Italy’s National Federation of Doctors and General Practitioners mourned Stella’s death. They added that they hope the government will take notice of the dangers Italian doctors and nurses are facing.

“He was the example of the capability and hard work of family doctors,” Silvestro Scotti, national secretary of the federation, said about Stella.

Spain has emerged as the strongest contender for 2nd-worst outbreak in Europe in what was until recently a three-way contest with France and Germany. Last week’s International Women’s Day March helped expedite the outbreak, according to city officials in Madrid, who are begging Spain’s federal government for some assistance.

In Boston, the JFK Presidential Library and Museum is closing immediately after two employees attended a conference last week where other attendees had confirmed cases of coronavirus, it said in a statement.

One of the largest livestock exhibitions and rodeos in the world will close early due to novel coronavirus fears, according to Houston city officials, who announced Friday that the city’s major Livestock Show and Rodeo will close earlier. It had been scheduled to run until March 22.


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/13/2020 – 10:27

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2QeYpYd Tyler Durden

NY Fed Announces Emergency QE, Will Buy $33BN In Bonds; Yields Tumble

NY Fed Announces Emergency QE, Will Buy $33BN In Bonds; Yields Tumble

US Treasury yields are plunging after The Fed announced what amounts to ‘Emergency QE’ to buy $33 billion in bonds at maturities up to 30 Years…

10Y yields have plunged 16bps on the headline…

And 30Y yields are now down 3bps on the day, after being up 35bps overnight…

FRBNY Statement Details:

The Desk will conduct purchases in each of five maturity sectors below at the times indicated, subject to reasonable prices. 

  • 20 to 30 year sector at 10:30 – 10:45 am and 2:15 to 2:45 pm for around $4 billion each

  • 7 to 20 year sector at 11:15 – 11:30 am  for around $5 billion

  • 4.5 to 7 year sector at 12:00 – 12:15 pm for around $8 billion

  • 2.25 to 4.5 year sector at 12:45 – 1:00 pm for around $8 billion

  • 0 to 2.25 year sector at 1:30 – 1:45 pm for around $8 billion

These purchases are intended to address highly unusual disruptions in the market for Treasury securities associated with the coronavirus outbreak.  These purchases are part of the $80 billion of planned monthly purchases, including both $60 billion of reserve management purchases and $20 billion of reinvestments of principal payments received from the Federal Reserve’s holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities.


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/13/2020 – 10:21

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2INxyy0 Tyler Durden