Spot The Spanish Reality

Having recently pointed out Draghi’s worst nightmare, we thought the anti-thesis of hope over reality that is occurring in European “markets” was worth pointing out. Spanish sovereign bond spreads have collapsed this week to their lowest (least risky) in 30 months at a mere 229bps. The total and utter disconnect of this supposed ‘free market’ based measure in the face of nothing but terrible Spanish data is entirely without precedent…

 

 

Today’s retail sales beat is the latest ‘outlier’ being heralded as supporting the disconnect – of course, that is until seasonal adjustments remove all the gains and reality sets back in.

 

While many expect Spain to emerge from recession in Q3 2013 (and we assume that is the ‘hope’ trend being extraploated), it is clear, as SocGen notes, that internal consumption is expected to stall through H2 2013 and push Spain back into recession in Q1 2014…

 

Via SocGen,

…despite the small improvement in unemployment in Q3, to 25% vs. a previous 26%, the labour market situation is still too poor to stimulate domestic demand in the short term. As before, we see the 2013 real GDP in negative territory at -1.0%, with more amendments to government expenditure items expected.

 

 

 

As the Bank of Spain pinpointed in its latest economic report, government consumption and specifically employee compensation is yet to be adjusted. We thus expect the impact on GDP to kick in early 2014 and bring Spain back to recession.

Chart: Bloomberg


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/oOJbhXh7Cm4/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Santelli Stunned As Nobel Winner Fama Explains Fed Unwind “Is No Big Deal”

If ever there was a few minutes of television to confirm the deep-seated disconnect between reality and the ivory-tower academics pulling the levers behind the curtain, CNBC’s Rick Santelli just exposed it. For once, simple questions were enough to allow none other than Nobel-Prize-winning economist Eugene Fama to show Santelli (who did his best not to explode in incredulity) that the “smartest people in the room” just don’t get it (just as they didn’t get it in 2007). Santelli was gracious and polite as he asked what the great professor’s thoughts were on QE… (and the entire brief clip is worth watching in its entirety) but his conclusion is perhaps the most stunning (and left Santelli almost silent)… when asked the impact of the Fed ‘Tapering’ or even selling down its $4 trillion in assets, Fama calmly says “it’s basically a neutral event… It’s No Big Deal!” Indeed, professor, that is so clear…

 

“What the Fed is doing now… is kind of a nothing activity.”

 

 

Or the Hollywood version…


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/E5kNzBDKNg4/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Santelli Stunned As Nobel Winner Fama Explains Fed Unwind "Is No Big Deal"

If ever there was a few minutes of television to confirm the deep-seated disconnect between reality and the ivory-tower academics pulling the levers behind the curtain, CNBC’s Rick Santelli just exposed it. For once, simple questions were enough to allow none other than Nobel-Prize-winning economist Eugene Fama to show Santelli (who did his best not to explode in incredulity) that the “smartest people in the room” just don’t get it (just as they didn’t get it in 2007). Santelli was gracious and polite as he asked what the great professor’s thoughts were on QE… (and the entire brief clip is worth watching in its entirety) but his conclusion is perhaps the most stunning (and left Santelli almost silent)… when asked the impact of the Fed ‘Tapering’ or even selling down its $4 trillion in assets, Fama calmly says “it’s basically a neutral event… It’s No Big Deal!” Indeed, professor, that is so clear…

 

“What the Fed is doing now… is kind of a nothing activity.”

 

 

Or the Hollywood version…


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/E5kNzBDKNg4/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Spot The Difference

As the investing public looks around for reasons why US equities are rallying, the harsh reality is highlighted in the following chart… all that matters is what JPY carry is doing. While correlation is not causation, we suspect you’d be hard-pressed to suggest we are not on to something here…

 

 

What is perhaps most worrisome is that the vertical ramp in both USDJPY and S&P 500 both began as NASDAQ imploded… at 1253ET


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/jxKL0XlsCO0/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Head Of World’s Largest Asset Manager Says “Imperative” For Taper To End “Bubble-Like Markets”

JPMorgan, Pimco, and now BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, all join the bubble warning chorus. From Bloomberg:

  • FINK SAYS IT’S “IMPERATIVE” THAT THE FED BEGIN TO TAPER
  • FINK CALLS MARKET `OVER-ZEALOUS’ 
  • FINK SAYS THERE ARE “REAL BUBBLE-LIKE MARKETS AGAIN”

So… when the three largest banks/asset managers in the US say that Ben Bernanke has blown the largest asset bubble in history and that the time to taper has come, will Janet Yellen once again turn a blind ear to warnings that come not just from the blogosphere but the respected legacy financial institutions, and afterward admit that, just like last time, she “never saw it coming?”


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/4hD4Ar_6Y-8/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Head Of World's Largest Asset Manager Says "Imperative" For Taper To End "Bubble-Like Markets"

JPMorgan, Pimco, and now BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, all join the bubble warning chorus. From Bloomberg:

  • FINK SAYS IT’S “IMPERATIVE” THAT THE FED BEGIN TO TAPER
  • FINK CALLS MARKET `OVER-ZEALOUS’ 
  • FINK SAYS THERE ARE “REAL BUBBLE-LIKE MARKETS AGAIN”

So… when the three largest banks/asset managers in the US say that Ben Bernanke has blown the largest asset bubble in history and that the time to taper has come, will Janet Yellen once again turn a blind ear to warnings that come not just from the blogosphere but the respected legacy financial institutions, and afterward admit that, just like last time, she “never saw it coming?”


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/4hD4Ar_6Y-8/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Bill Gross: “All Risk Asset Prices Artificially High”

First it was JPMorgan, now it is PIMCO’s turn.

Alas, by now everyone but the Fed realizes there is a bubble in practically every asset class. As such, Gross’ tweeter time may be better spent engaging in smack talk with Carl Icahn: it is far more entertaining and engaging.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/-0mAdwwkDrs/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Bill Gross: "All Risk Asset Prices Artificially High"

First it was JPMorgan, now it is PIMCO’s turn.

Alas, by now everyone but the Fed realizes there is a bubble in practically every asset class. As such, Gross’ tweeter time may be better spent engaging in smack talk with Carl Icahn: it is far more entertaining and engaging.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/-0mAdwwkDrs/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Guest Post: System Reset 2014-2015

Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith of OfTwoMinds blog,

Resets occur when the price of everything that has been repressed, manipulated or obscured is repriced.

The global financial system will reset in 2014-2015, regardless of official pronouncements and financial media propaganda hyping the "recovery." Despite the wide spectrum of forecasts (from rosy to stormy), nobody knows precisely what will transpire in 2014-2015, so we must remain circumspect about any and all predictions– especially our own.

Even as we are mindful of the risks of a forecast being wrong (and the righteous humility that befits any analysis), it seems increasingly self-evident that financial systems around the world are reaching extremes that generally presage violent resets to new equilibria–typically at much lower levels of complexity and energy consumption.

John Michael Greer has described the process of descending stair-step resets (my description, not his) as catabolic collapse. The system resets at a lower level and maintains the new equilibrium for some time before the next crisis/system failure triggers another reset.

There is much systems-analysis intelligence in Greer's concept: systems without interactive feedbacks may collapse suddenly in a heap, but more complex systems tend to stair-step down in a series of resets to lower levels of consumption and complexity–for example, the Roman Empire, which reset many times before reaching the near-collapse level of phantom legions, full-strength on official documents, defending phantom borders.

In the present, we can expect the overly costly, complex, inefficient, fraud-riddled U.S. sickcare (i.e. "healthcare") system to reset as providers (i.e. doctors and physicians' groups) opt out of ObamaCare, Medicare and Medicaid; like the phantom armies defending phantom borders of the crumbling Empire, the vast, centralized empire of sickcare will remain officially at full strength, but few will be able to find caregivers willing to provide care within the systems.

Just as much of the collateral supporting the stock, bond and housing bubbles is phantom, many other centralized systems will reset to phantom status. As local and state governments' revenues are increasingly diverted to fund public union employees' sickcare and pension benefits, the services provided by government will decline as the number of retirees swells and the number of government employees actually filling potholes, etc. drops.

Local government will offer services that are increasingly phantom, as stagnating tax revenues fund benefits for retirees rather than current services. On paper, cities will remain responsible for filling potholes, but in the real world, the potholes will go unfilled. In response, cities will ask taxpayers to approve bonds that cost triple the price of pay-as-you-go pothole filling, as a way to dodge the inevitable conflict between government retirees benefits and taxpayers burdened with decaying streets, schools, etc. and ever-higher taxes.

As for phantom collateral–the real value of the collateral will be undiscovered until people start selling assets in earnest. As long as everyone is buying, the phantom nature of the collateral is masked; it's only when everyone tries to get their money out of asset bubbles is the actual value of the underlying collateral discovered.

When assets go bidless, i.e. there are no buyers at any price, the phantom nature of the supposedly solid collateral is revealed. Price discovery is one way of describing reset; transparent pricing of risk is another way of saying the same thing.

When risk has been mispriced via state guarantees, fraud, willful obfuscation, complexity fortresses, etc., then the repricing of risk also resets the system.

Resets occur when the price of everything that has been repressed, manipulated or obscured is repriced. The greater the manipulation and financial repression, the more violent the reset. What been manipulated, obscured or repressed? Virtually everything: risk, credit, assets, labor, currency, you name it. Everything that has been manipulated by central banks and central states will be repriced.

Trust is difficult to price. Every reset erodes trust in the capacity of the centralized status quo to manipulate/repress price to its liking. Once trust in the system is lost, it cannot be purchased at any cost.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/3MvYptdNzTQ/story01.htm Tyler Durden