Chesapeake Founder Aubrey McClendon Dies In Car Crash One Day After Federal Indictment

Just one day after the DOJ unveiled its had indicted Chesapeake Founder and former CEO Aubrey McClendon on federal charges of conspiring to rig bids for oil and natural gas leases, moments ago the Oklahoma Police announced that he was found dead in a car accident, when while traveling in a 2013 Chevy Tahoe at a high rate of speed he crashed while driving on a two-lane highway and was engulfed in flames.

  • FORMER CHESAPEAKE CEO MCCLENDON DEAD AFTER CAR ACCIDENT: CNBC
  • OKLAHOMA CITY POLICE SAY AUBREY MCCLENDON DEAD
  • MCCLENDON WAS GOING FASTER THAN SPEED LIMIT: POLICE
  • MCCLENDON WAS ALONE IN 2013 CHEVY TAHOE WHEN HE CRASHED
  • MCCLENDON’S VEHICLE ENGULFED IN FLAMES AFTER CRASH

The police adds that it responded at 9:12 am to a fatality accident involving McClendon, and that he was traveling south on Midwest Blvd., between Memorial and 122nd St.. The scene of the crash:

Oklahoma Police reveals more details on the crash in the CNBC clip below:

 

Earlier today, McClendon released the following statement regarding the DOJ indictment:

“The charge that has been filed against me today is wrong and unprecedented. I have been singled out as the only person in the oil and gas industry in over 110 years since the Sherman Act became law to have been accused of this crime in relation to joint bidding on leasehold.  Anyone who knows me, my business record and the industry in which I have worked for 35 years, knows that I could not be guilty of violating any antitrust laws.  All my life I have worked to create jobs in Oklahoma, grow its economy, and to provide abundant and affordable energy to all Americans. I am proud of my track record in this industry, and I will fight to prove my innocence and to clear my name.” – Aubrey McClendon

And now let the speculation begin whether this was a suicide.

More details to come.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1OQPgd3 Tyler Durden

“How To Move To Canada” Searches Spike 1,000% After Trump Super Tuesday Rout

Super Tuesday sure was “super” for Donald Trump.

The billionaire – who has gone from “joke” to “frontrunner” in the span of just 9 months – is now the presumed pick for the GOP nomination.

That’s rattled the Republican establishment and sent shockwaves through Washington where no one – and we mean on one – can figure out how this happened.

And while citizens clearly believe Trump is preferable to America’s entrenched political aristocracy, there are quite a few people who have very real reservations about the prospects of a Trump presidency. As we noted earlier this week, readers will likely disagree with a number of Larry Summers’ points, but the bottom line is that some Americans are concerned about the direction the coutnry will take under a Trump presidency.

As The Telegraph notes, searches by Americans for “how can I move to Canada” were up more than 1,000% at their peak after Trump’s Super Tuesday victory.

And so, while this would seem to indicate a bit of national disaffection for the Trump bid, it’s worth noting that the billionaire’s supoort base is unwavering. In fact, the GOP frontrunner’s dominating performance on Tuesday evening indicates that for every American who wants to move to Canada should in the event he wins the presidency, there are just as many (or many more) Americans who think Trump is just what the country needs. 

“While analysts were already aware of Trump’s popularity among less-educated workers, his landslide win in Massachusetts with 49 per cent of the vote was particularly surprising, since the state has the most educated population in the U.S,” The Telegraph goes on to note. 

At his victory speech in Florida, he said: “I’m going to get along very well with the world. You’re going to be very proud of me as president.”

Well, unless you move to Canada. In which case you’ll have to be “very proud” of Justin Trudeau.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1OQPdxS Tyler Durden

How to Beat the DMV Bureaucracy

ProPublica‘s tagline declares the site’s mission You're just a number to us.as “Journalism in the Public Interest,” and what could be more in the public interest than helping the citizenry beat the unnecessary roadblocks imposed by public employees?

In a recently published article, web producer Hannah Birch describes her quest to secure a New York state driver’s license despite being medically unable to complete the Department of Motor Vehicle’s (DMV) vision exam.

Birch suffers from oculocutaneous albinism, an eye condition which allows her to see well enough to drive safely but which prevents her from making out the small-printed text of an eye exam. She writes, “even though I can’t read those tiny little letters on the sheet of paper they hold up, doctors in three states now have concluded my vision is good enough for me to safely drive.”

The NY DMV provides a form which allows a person to submit a doctor’s evaluation of their ability to drive. Even though Birch had that form, as well as a doctor’s thumb’s up, she knew she was in for a long hard slog at the most loathed of state bueraucracies because as she notes, “government workers can still make it difficult for you to get what you’re qualified for under the law.”

She provides helpful tips for success in a place where you are literally just a number to the people who work there:

  • Know As Much As You Can in Advance
  • Figure Out As Much As You Can Quickly
  • Use Keywords
  • Speak Directly and Stand Your Ground
  • Follow Up With the People Who Helped You Out

Her mantra for slaying the beast can be summarized as “Be nice, know your shit, but don’t take any shit.” But Birch puts it much more politely here:

Bottom line: Don’t get pushed around. As much as you can, know what you are and aren’t obligated to do in a given situation. Be open to talking something through, but don’t get bullied into unnecessary hassles.

Read the whole thing here

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1RHSJyZ
via IFTTT

Ayn Rand Warned Us About the Dangers of a President Like Trump

Tyler Cowen, George Mason University economist and chief of the Mercatus Center, warns us at his blog Marginal Revolution that:

if you own a large company, it is virtually impossible to be in accordance with all of the regulations all of the time.  If there were a President who wished to pursue vendettas, the regulatory state would be the most direct and simplest way for him or her to do so.  The usual presumption of “innocent until proven guilty” does not hold in many regulatory matters, nor are there always the usual protections of due process….

Philip Hamburger’s book Is Administrative Law Unlawful? occasioned some critical reviews [and] by no means do I agree with everything he said. But these days, the notion that the regulatory state could prove dangerous to individual liberties, and not just to economic growth, needs to be taken more seriously, and he has written the “go to” book on that topic. 

Cowen goes on to point out the special dangers Donald Trump running the executive branch might pose in such a world.

Lots of libertarians, and normal humans as well, learned the overarching basics of that lesson many years ago from Ayn Rand in her novel Atlas Shrugged. (Yes, the same Rand who most anti-Trump crusaders consider a terribly dangerous and ignorant menace.)

In the context of her terrifying tale of a nation and an economy brought to practical and moral ruin by an overpowerful government driven by a veneer of phony altruism, her character Dr. Floyd Ferris tells metal magnate Henry Rearden:

The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws….just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers…”

And a nation of law-breakers’ freedom depends entirely on when or whether the government decides to crack down. No decent person wants a system like that at all. But one might think someone with Trump’s demonstrated sense of raw id would be especially alarming. It’s an important argument against Trump, and alas we’ll have plenty of need to bring it up over and over again as this election year crawls toward it’s terrifying climax.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1Lypdwn
via IFTTT

Welcome to the Dark Net: New at Reason

The most paranoid fantasy about what happens in the darkest corners when humanity is unsupervised online might look something like the assassination markets described in Jamie Bartlett’s new book The Dark Net: Inside the Digital Underworld. The idea, hatched by the anarchist Jim Bell, is to allow anonymous digital cash donations toward the slaying of public figures. Correctly predicting the death date wins the bettor a payoff, based on the sly presumption that the reason you got it right was that you caused the death. The idea, Bartlett explains, was to exert “a populist pressure on elected representatives to be good.” This grim technofantasy for angry dissidents has not, as far as we know, ever paid off.

Bartlett directs the Centre for the Analysis of Social Media at the British think tank Demos (not to be confused with the liberal American think tank of the same name). He began his breezy and humane book expecting to find more clear-cut cases of people and behaviors to condemn and proscribe. But what he ended up finding, reports Senior Editor Brian Doherty, was just human beings: dedicated, troubled, incendiary, funny, craving to be heard and understood. Welcome to the Dark Net. Welcome to the human race.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1LypdfO
via IFTTT

How The U.S. Government And HSBC Teamed Up To Hide The Truth From A Pennsylvania Couple

Submitted by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

The reason both the Democratic and Republican establishments are in full on panic mode about the rise of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders is a deep seated fear that the plebs have finally woken up.

Democrats rail against big corporations, while Republicans rail against big government. This scheme has been used to successfully divide and conquer the public for decades while big government and big business successfully schemed to divert all wealth and power to an ever smaller minuscule segment of the population — themselves.

It took awhile, but the people are finally starting getting it and they are royally pissed off. One of the primary mechanisms for this historic elite theft has been the creation of a two-tiered justice system in which the rich, powerful and connected are never prosecuted for their criminality. Instead, the government actively protects them by pretending corporate entities commit crimes as opposed to individuals. Of course, this is impossible, but yet it’s how the government handles white collar crime. The Orwellian named “Justice Department” casually utilizes deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs), in which companies pay a little fine and the criminals themselves walk away with not just their freedom, but ill gotten monetary gains as well.

Nowhere is this most apparent than when it comes to the big banks. The individuals who work at these criminal cartels can literally do anything they want with total impunity. One of the most egregious examples of this was the $1.9 billion settlement arranged with HSBC for laundering Mexican drug cartel money and dealing with sanctioned countries. If you or I did this we’d be sitting in a concrete box eating porridge through a straw for the rest of our lives, but when “masters of the world” at big banks do it, the parent company just pays a slap on the wrist fine and life goes on. That’s how oligarch justice works.

Although the Department of Justice and HSBC thought the money laundering case was settled ancient history, a determined chemist from Pennsylvania is throwing a wrench into their plans and it could have major implications.

The Wall Street Journal reports:

WEST CHESTER, Pa.—When Dean Moore ran into roadblocks with a request for mortgage relief, he did what many people do: He sat down at his kitchen table to bang out an angry letter.

 

The letter has thrust Mr. Moore, a chemist, and his wife, Ann Marie Fletcher-Moore, a part-time bookstore manager, into a high-stakes battle over whether HSBC Holdings PLC must release a secret report on its compliance with a $1.9 billion money-laundering settlement.

A “secret” report. You’ve got to be kidding me.

The disclosure would be the first ever for this type of case and would shine a light on an increasingly common practice for banks accused of breaking the law. Instead of being prosecuted, banks typically enter into settlements under which they often agree to be overseen by monitors whose detailed judgments are kept secret. Judge Gleeson’s order has the potential to dial back that confidentiality, opening a new channel of information that prosecutors say could threaten the viability of such settlements in future cases.

If you don’t get by now that America is a banana republic, there’s little hope for you.

HSBC and Justice Department prosecutors have opposed the release, saying it wouldn’t do much to help Mr. Moore with his mortgage predicament. Judge Gleeson, in his order to unseal the report, said that was irrelevant.

Big banks and the U.S. government are simply 100% in bed together. Constantly scheming to prevent citizens from learning the truth.

The bank is appealing the ruling, but already it may be having an impact. HSBC disclosed last week that the January report by independent monitor Michael Cherkasky found instances of potential financial crime and had “significant concerns” about the bank’s pace of progress in complying with the money-laundering settlement.

A legitimate government that cared about the people would want the public to know this, but not the U.S. government.

The Moores say the experience has been surreal. The couple lives in this Philadelphia suburb with their four children, two dogs and a 15-year-old rabbit and had never spent much time in court other than for jury duty. They have nevertheless held their own against a phalanx of lawyers from the British bank and the Justice Department. A recent hearing in a Brooklyn federal court “was like ‘Law and Order,’” said Mrs. Fletcher-Moore, who is 50 years old.

HSBC admitted in its 2012 settlement that it failed to catch at least $881 million in drug-trafficking proceeds laundered through its U.S. bank and that its staff stripped data from transactions with Iran, Libya and Sudan to evade U.S. sanctions.

 

The mortgage was administered by HSBC, and the Moores say they wrote to the bank starting in 2008 asking it to temporarily lower the 7% interest rate. They said the lender appeared receptive, only for its representatives to misplace documents needed to complete their application for a loan modification several times.

 

Frustrated, the Moores researched the bank online last year and stumbled upon news of the money-laundering settlement and the monitor’s secret report. The Moores say they believe the report details faulty internal controls like those they encountered when trying to modify their loan.

 

If his ruling stands, it would be “the first time we get to see what happens after a bank settles a prosecution,” said Brandon Garrett, a professor at University of Virginia’s law school who has studied the monitor system.

Which is exactly what the U.S. government doesn’t want people to see.

HSBC and the Justice Department are still fighting to keep the report private and have appealed Judge Gleeson’s ruling to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. An appeals court ruling could be months away. “I feel like a very small boat in a very large ocean,” Mr. Moore wrote at one point, in a letter responding to some of their arguments.

For more on the corrupt U.S. justice system, see:

How the Department of Justice is Actively Trying to Prevent Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform

Is the Justice Department Finally Ready to Jail Corporate Criminals?

Florida Man Sentenced to 2.5 Years in Jail for Having Sex on the Beach

Some Leaks Are More Equal Than Others – Hypocritical D.C. Insiders Line up to Defend General Petraeus from Prosecution

Some Money Launderers are “More Equal” than Others

Some Money Launderers are More Equal than Others Part 2 – CEO of BitInstant is Arrested

Just another day in the…

Screen Shot 2015-09-24 at 5.05.26 PM


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1oZnMNU Tyler Durden

And Then There Were 4 – Ben Carson Says “No Path Forward” In Presidential Bid

After a disappointing Tuesday, Ben Carson is out…

I have decided not to attend the Fox News GOP Presidential Debate tomorrow night in Detroit.  Even though I will not be in my hometown of Detroit on Thursday, I remain deeply committed to my home nation, America.

 

 

I do not see a political path forward in light of last evening’s Super Tuesday primary results. However, this grassroots movement on behalf of “We the People” will continue. Along with millions of patriots who have supported my campaign for President, I remain committed to Saving America for Future Generations. We must not depart from our goals to restore what God and our Founders intended for this exceptional nation.

 

I appreciate the support, financial and otherwise, from all corners of America.  Gratefully, my campaign decisions are not constrained by finances; rather by what is in the best interests of the American people.

 

I will discuss more about the future of this movement during my speech on Friday at CPAC in Washington, D.C.

*  *  *

Kasich?


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1QM0yQX Tyler Durden

Beige Book: Fed Confused By Impact Of Low Gas Prices, Blames Stock Market, Sees Rising Wage Pressures

In addition to noticing the diminishing impact of the weather (there were 26 instances of “weather” in the January beige book, down to 17 in March), one thing that caught our eyes about the Fed’s March Beige Book was three odd mentions of the “stock market”(compared to zero in January) which was blamed for everything from concerning business responses, to slowing new leasing activity, to lack of activity, to wit:

  • Some contacts mention concerns about business response to stock market fluctuations, the strong dollar, and political uncertainty due to the upcoming elections.
  • In Providence, new leasing activity slowed somewhat and deals in progress proceeded at a slower pace, developments attributed to heightened uncertainty stemming from stock market volatility and the national election cycle.
  • Some suggested that uncertainty and stock market volatility may have contributed to the lack of activity.

Another thing that the Fed was confused by was the mixed response to lower gas prices:

  • There were mixed reports about the effects of lower gasoline prices on consumer spending, with contacts in Cleveland, Philadelphia, and St. Louis attributing some increased spending to lower gas prices and contacts from Boston and Chicago expressing disappointment about the extent to which lower gas prices were increasing other spending.
  • Contacts expressed disappointment in the extent to which lower gas prices and improvements in the labor market were translating into sales growth.

But what was most notable is that while the Fed clearly is focusing on the stock market and the gas pump, it may have run out of “data dependent” hedges to use to avoid hiking rates. Recall this from the January beige book, when the Fed clearly was worried about “subdued” wage pressures:

Overall, wage pressures remained relatively subdued, as evidenced by reports from Philadelphia, Atlanta, Chicago, and Kansas City. Just two Districts–New York and San Francisco–indicated some acceleration in upward wage pressures. Cleveland, Richmond, and Dallas cited mixed reports, ranging from flat to moderate wage pressures. Seven Districts mentioned greater wage pressures for skilled workers in a variety of industries, including construction, manufacturing, financial, professional, technology, and health-care sectors. However, wage pressures among low-skilled positions were almost as pervasive, with six Districts citing pressure stemming from state minimum wage increases and from labor shortages or turnover among entry-level positions in banking, retail, and hospitality.

This has now become the following:

Wages generally increased, as most Districts experienced slight to strong wage growth. However, the Kansas City, Richmond and Atlanta Districts reported flat wage growth. St. Louis noted strong wage growth as fifty-six percent of contacts, the highest in two years, reported that wages were above year-ago levels. Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St Louis, Minneapolis, and San Francisco reported positive wage growth among high-skilled workers, especially for occupations in the technology, high-skilled manufacturing, aerospace and defense, financial services, and professional technical sectors. Furthermore, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, and Kansas City reported wage growth among low-skill and entry-level positions. A contact in Chicago attributed the rise of entry-level wages in Michigan to an increase in the minimum wage. Staffing firms in the Boston District reported single-digit wage increases, but staffing services contacts in Dallas cited easing wage pressures, especially in Houston. Wage pressures moderated in the service sector in Richmond but continued upward pressure was cited in New York. Wages in the retail sector declined in the Kansas City District but increased in Cleveland.

In other words, while the Fed realizes that its actions are impacting the market, and that plunging gas prices are not the “unambiguously good” thing oil tourists expected one year ago, it now has to deal with not only the highest core inflation in years, but rising wages.

Said otherwise, the March FOMC meeting just went “rate hike” hot again.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1oZnMNI Tyler Durden

“The Libertarian Voice Is Gone” From GOP Prez Race, Says Thomas Massie (New at Reason)

Reason sat down with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) at the recent International Students for Liberty Conference in Washington, D.C. We talked about the 2016 election (“I don’t think there is a good outcome,” he says now that Rand Paul is out), his “gateway issue” into libertarianism (“I grew up in a rural area where everybody had guns. And then I went to college and realized people in college wanted to ban these things.”), and why he wants to write a “dating manual” for incoming representatives and senators:

Congressmen get led to a place they never want to go. And then they find themselves there and they find themselves trying to argue that that’s the right position. 

[I’d like to] explain to them how they’re going to get lead in those directions, how they’re going to get whipped into voting for things they never intended to vote for. It’s almost sort of like a dating manual for adolescents: Like, “When this happens, and you feel uncomfortable, there’s a reason you feel uncomfortable….” Just you know, say this. You sort of need that dating manual when they get there so they don’t end up in places they don’t want to be. 

About 7 minutes. Watch by clicking above or click below for transcript, downloadable versions, and more videos.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1TSKfHk
via IFTTT

Ben Carson Admits His Presidential Campaign Has No “Path Forward”

Technically, Ben Carson isn’t dropping out of the Republican presidential race. But for all practical purposes, he’s dropping out. 

Carson, a respected neurosurgeon who has struggled in primary election contests so far, won’t attend tomorrow night’s GOP debate on Fox News, and he will issue a statement today saying that he sees no “path forward” for his campaign, according to The Washington Post. 

“I do not see a political path forward in light of last evening’s Super Tuesday primary results,” the statement says. “However, this grassroots movement on behalf of ‘We the People’ will continue.”

So even with that admission, he’s not ending or suspending his campaign officially. At least not yet.

Carson will address his fans and friends on Friday at the Conservative Political Action Conference near Washington, D.C., and lay out plans for his political future. 

In other words, he’s quitting the race. He’s just not officially saying so quite yet. 

Carson never really had much of a chance to win the GOP nomination. As I wrote last year, his appeal was fundamentally apolitical, built on his personality, sensibility, and history of genuinely impressive accomplishments as a pediatric neurosurgeon. That he seemed to know little about the basics of politics and policy was, in some sense, a strength. Throughout the campaign he seemed almost surprised by his own success, by the fact that he was standing on stage with the other top tier contenders, of the GOP field, and that at times, he was beating most of them.

But for a candidate with little to no chance to win the Republican primary contest, Carson performed surprisingly well, rocketing to the top of the polls last fall. In November, Carson briefly closed the gap with Trump in national polls, drawing the frontrunner to an effective tie. For a moment, he was the co-frontrunner. That’s something that no other GOP candidate has even come close to managing. Carson just couldn’t hold onto his support for very long.

Carson’s campaign, then, serves as a secondary illustration of the mood of the Republican party and the strength of its desire for outsider candidates with little or no political experience and not a lot of preexisting knowledge about the particulars of policy. 

And yet his failed campaign is also a reminder of how difficult it is for someone to pull off a successful Trump-style outsider run, and how likely those campaigns are to surge briefly and then fail, even with an outsider as appealing and genial as Carson at the helm. 

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1SiLGPo
via IFTTT