Stocks, Yuan Extend Losses As Kudlow Confirms “No” China Trade Progress

It seems Bloomberg’s sources are ‘fake’ as Larry Kudlow confirms to CNBC that the President did not ask the cabinet to draw up any trade deal with China and that there has been no responses from China on trade.

“…there is no massive movement between US and China on trade…”

Additionally, Kudlow confirmed that more tariffs on China are possible and that he is “not as optimistic” on a deal as he once was.

Stocks extended losses on the news…

Erasing all of Bloomberg headlines gains…

And Yuan is dropping back further…

via RSS https://ift.tt/2AHvggI Tyler Durden

“Only A Serious Economic Shock”: ECB Said To Consider New T-LTRO; Euro Tumbles

2012 was a seminal year for Europe and the ECB: that was the year when tensions in Euro markets receded in the second half of 2012, following Mr. Draghi’s seminal “whatever it takes” intervention in July of that year. The resulting containment of re-denomination risk in the Euro area and the wider improvement in market sentiment that followed helped re-establish a basis for better functioning of private markets. As a result, the need for central bank intermediation of intra-Euro area cross-border financial flows diminished.

But just as importantly, that was also the year when the ECB’s balance sheet had peaked shortly after the first 3-year Longer-Term Refinancing Operation (LTRO) was conducted…

… and whose runoff resulted in a major shrinkage in the ECB’s balance sheet, ultimately forcing Mario Draghi to launch QE as yields blew out.

Fast forward to today, when it is “deja vu” all over again for the ECB’s T(argeted)-LTRO.

But first, some background: At his press conference following the October 25 Governing Council meeting, ECB President Mario Draghi mentioned that “the TLTRO was raised by two speakers … but not in any detail”. And subsequently in a speech given in Paris, Banque de France Governor François Villeroy de Galhau remarked that “the question of TLTROs will need to be considered”.

Apparently, the targeted long-term refinancing operations (T-LTROs) initiated by the ECB in mid-2014 are coming back into policymakers’ focus, as one of the range of policy instruments available to manage the evolution of Euro area monetary policy.

Part of this renewed focus results from the first wave of 4-year T-LTROs starting to run off the ECB’s balance sheet. The first such operation was conducted in June 2014. The second was announced in March 2016. And, as Goldman points out in a recent note, to the extent that these operations maturing is associated with better market access for banks that had funded through the T-LTROs, this is a healthy sign of the re-booting of the credit system following the travails of the crisis years.

However, policymakers revisiting T-LTROs may also be a symptom of less benign developments. In particular, it may be symptomatic of the funding situation of banks that remain reliant on ECB operations to finance their balance sheets.

And, with the Italian sovereign debt/bank crisis once again on the radar at a time when the central bank is about to end its QE, any suggestion that the ECB will soon experience a period of significant balance sheet shrinkage will likely be met with even more dread by the market.

Here is the problem in a nutshell: Euro-area lenders are facing a cliff edge for their funding, and, as Bloomberg notes, some are hoping the European Central Bank will help them out. Around €722 billion ($832 billion) of long-term loans granted to banks by the ECB will start maturing from 2020, and new regulatory standards mean replacement funds could be needed as soon as next year. Adding to the concerns of balance sheet reducation is that lenders could be forced to refinance just as market rates rise, spurred by tighter U.S. policy and tensions such as Brexit and Italian politics.

As a result, some banks have been in contact with the ECB to discuss the risk of letting those four-year loans expire without affordable alternatives being in place, Bloomberg sources report, with some discussions taking place on the sidelines of the International Monetary Fund meeting in Bali this month.

And now, according to MarketNews, the ECB has responded to these concerns and is indeed considering a fresh T-LTRO.

That the ECB is considering this, or merely “trial ballooning” the concept, suggests that the ECB is getting nervous about a confluence of events, one of which is the sharp slowdown in the Eurozone economy, which just printed the lowest GDP in 4 years…

…even as the standoff between Rome and Brussels over Italy’s deficit continues with zero progress, resulting in sporadic episodes of bond market turbulence and threatening not only Italian sovereign bonds, but also Italian banks (due to the doom loop), and by implication, contagion into the broader Eurozone.

According to MNI, a new T-LTRO could be discussed as soon as December, but notes that “only a serious economic shock could prompt the move.

Of course, since nothing has been fixed in the Eurozone, the ECB will have no choice but launch a new T-LTRO, one which merely allows existing debt to be rolled over, however by doing so it would confirm that the Eurozone has, in fact, triggered an “economic shock.”

Which is why it is no surprise why the Euro tumbled to session lows on the news…

… sent the dollar to highs, and pushed yields higher now that the sequence of events at the ECB appears to be T-LTRO first, and only then more QE, confounding those analysts who expected Draghi to give up on his plan to end QE and continue monetizing Eurozone debt.

In any case, and as is customary for the ECB, watch for a round of denials in the near-term, followed by another trial balloon to gauge the market reaction, before Draghi ultimately commits to a new, and massive T-LTRO some time around the turn of the new year.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2JBxCAw Tyler Durden

President Trump Sends His Most Direct Warning To Iran Yet…

Having reportedly ‘folded’ by agreeing to let eight countries – including Japan, India and South Korea – keep buying Iranian oil after it reimposes sanctions on the OPEC producer next week, it seems President Trump wanted to show how tough he is once again.

In what can only be described as a ‘Game Of Thrones’-style tweet, the president just tweeted an image of himself with the words “Sanctions Are Coming” (playing on the HBO show’s ‘Winter is Coming’ warning)…

The identity of the countries getting waivers is expected to be released officially on Monday, when U.S. restrictions against oil dealings with Iran go back into effect.

“We’re quite confident moving forward that the actions that are being taken are going to help us exert maximum pressure against the Iranian regime,” deputy State Department spokesman Robert Palladino said at a briefing on Thursday.

“This leading state sponsor of terrorism is going to see revenues cut off significantly that will deprive it of its ability to fund terrorism throughout the region.”

Still, reverting back to the Game of Thrones analogy, we hope Trump is not underestimating the ‘dragon’ that Iran has at its back.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2P6MKMv Tyler Durden

First Troops Arrive At US-Mexico Border For “Operation Faithful Patriot” 

The first 100 active-duty US military servicemembers have arrived at the US-Mexico border as part of Operation Faithful Patriot, as a caravan of Central American migrants winds its way north through Mexico after having rejected Mexico’s offer of “shelter, medical attention, schooling and jobs.” 

The US troops are doing initial assessments of the border crossing at McAllen, Texas according to Fox News, while a Defense Department official told the network that there are around 2,600 troops at staging bases “largely in Texas,” while several thousand more are anticipated to arrive this weekend to California and Arizona. 

The Pentagon has said that over 7,000 US troops are being sent to the border, while President Trump said on Wednesday that the number could reach as high as 15,000

Trump has drawn a hard line on immigration just ahead of the midterm elections.

Last week, officials indicated that 800 to 1,000 troops might be sent. On Monday, they announced that about 5,200 were being deployed. The next day, an Air Force general rejected a news report putting the figure at up to 14,000.

The troops going to the border areas of Texas, Arizona and California are a small fraction of the nation’s roughly 1.3 million active-duty service members, and the mission is set to last only 45 days. –Fox News

Troop movement has been documented over the last several days over social media:

The military operation is being headed up by Gen. Terrance O’Shaughnessy – head of the US Northern Command. He has argued that the caravan is a potential threat, though has not expanded on what he meant. 

“I think what we have seen is we’ve seen clearly an organization at a higher level than we’ve seen before,” O’Shaughnessy said. “We’ve seen violence coming out of the caravan and we’ve seen as they’ve passed other international borders, we’ve seen them behave in a nature that has not been what we’ve seen in the past.”

On Thursday following reports that members of the caravan were throwing rocks at Mexican forces, President Trump said that the US military would treat anyone throwing rocks as if they were “rifles,” implying that troops would fire on the caravan. 

Trump’s comments come on the heels of several clips featuring violent migrants, including this one of rocks being thrown at Mexican security forces on the Guatemalan border. 

Trump promised an executive order sometime next week which would ban migrants from being able to claim asylum if they cross the US border illegally. He has also promised to set up vast tent cities “all over the place” in order to house caravan members, as opposed to the longstanding policy of “catch and release” by which asylum seekers are given court dates before they are set free.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2P5Lj0V Tyler Durden

Crude’s Collapse & The ‘C’ Word: “Let’s Just Pretend This Isn’t Happening…Again”

Authored by Jeffrey Snider via Alhambra Investment Partners,

Why aren’t more people talking about this? It’s a huge development and nary a peep anywhere. The mainstream media is filled with baited expectations for 3% wage growth on Payroll Friday. All eyes are on the labor market, which is a lagging indication, instead of on the oil market, which is forward looking.

As of this writing, the futures curve for WTI has expanded this current selloff. The level of alarming contango has continued to widen, in both amplitude as well as frequency, in just the past few days.

The question at the front was rhetorical. The reason everyone wishes to focus on the labor report is obvious. The wage data in particular outwardly though misleadingly conforms to the idea of an economic boom, at least in the US. The crude market isn’t just saying “wait a minute”, it completely refutes that very thing.

Furthermore, the oil curve had only been in backwardation less than a year. It flipped toward that positive economic signal, which was widely covered, exactly one year ago today.

We’ve seen this all before. The oil curve shifted to contango last on November 20, 2014. It was ignored then, too, and after catching some reluctant notice immediately dismissed as a supply glut in favor of data showing the “best jobs market in decades.” The payroll reports four years ago were just too lovely to set aside for this impossible, according to Economists, ugliness.

Guess which one proved more valuable in assessing the way the global economy was headed, US most definitely included:

Etc., etc.

That, too, was a rhetorical exercise. Expect to hear about another “supply glut”, OPEC and some such, when convention finally does address another futures curve leaning the wrong way. And then we will hear about how “unexpected” everything will be when the labor market data proves irrelevant (already being legitimately uninspiring) all over again.

Honest analysis would take the WTI futures curve, along with the yield curve and eurodollar futures curves, as the world economy and markets traversing deeper into the red (below). Here as well as overseas. 

The alarms grow louder and louder. 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2D0IQO7 Tyler Durden

College Grads Vs High School Dropouts: A Disturbing Observation

A surprising trends has emerged when comparing the labor force participation rate of those with a college degree or higher versus high school dropouts. As the chart below shows, over the past 2 decades, the participation rate of college graduates has been steadily declining.

At the same time, the LFPR of high school dropouts – those with less than a high school education – has been rising ever since the mid 1990s, and is now just why of all time highs hit during the peak of the financial crisis.

To be sure, there are many ways to analyze, or spin, this data: college grads are getting older and as a result of hitting their retirement years, are dropping out of the broader labor force at an accelerating rate. Meanwhile, high school dropouts, mostly younger people, do not face the same demographic pressures and continue to gain “market share.” Alternatively, high school dropouts are increasingly in demand due to their non-existent wage demand leverage while college grads are increasingly pricing themselves out of the job market; Or simply employers don’t need to hire as many college grads and would rather hire cheap, unqualified, easily accessible workers whom they then train for their specific needs.

Whatever the reason, the difference in the labor force participation between college grads and high school dropouts has never been lower.

Extending and extrapolating this trend suggests that some time over the next two decades, the labor force participation rate of high school dropouts in the US labor pool may be the same, if not higher, than that of college grads.

And while one can debate what is causing this troubling compression, the implications for future US productivity should the US labor force become increasing saturated with minimally skilled workers at the expense of qualified college grads, is rather dire.

Then again, Bloomberg has yet to start tracking the labor force participation rate of robots: something tells us that the growth rate in this category will soon be off the charts.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2PGF0As Tyler Durden

Whitey Bulger’s Killing May Have Been Result Of 38-Year-Old Revenge Plot

More underworld figures are stepping up to accuse the federal government of arranging the jailhouse murder of James ‘Whitey’ Bulger, the notorious boss of Boston’s Irish mob boss who was killed by a group of inmates at a West Virginia prison earlier this week mere hours after being transferred to the facility.

While the Federal Bureau of Prisons has refused to share any additional details regarding Bulger’s slaying, anonymous sources from inside the prison have already shared the brutal details with the press. A suspect in the murder has also been identified, a New England mafia hitman who may have killed Bulger due to Bulger’s notorious cooperation with the FBI.

Weichel

And late Thursday, the New York Post reported that the suspected killer, Fotios “Freddy” Geas, who was convicted in 2003 for participating in the murder of Springfield mafia leader “Big Al” Bruno, may have whacked Bulger as a gesture of revenge for Bulger framing a friend of Geas’s for a 1980 murder. Frederick Weichel, whom Geas befriended in prison, was released last year after spending 36 years in prison for the murder after a judge ordered a retrial and prosecutors declined to prosecute. The retrial order was precipitated by Bulger’s decision to turn over evidence that exonerated Weichel, though the Irish gangster refused to sign a sworn affidavit alleging Weichel’s innocence.

But as Weichel pointed out in an interview, a lot of factors had to fall into place for Bulger’s murder to have unfolded the way it did. And it would be naive to believe these were a string of coincidences.

“I think everybody in the world knew that Whitey screwed me,” Weichel told the Globe Wednesday.

Weichel couldn’t recall if he spoke about his theory with Geas. He added that he was shocked that Bulger, 89, was transferred to the same Hazelton penitentiary as Geas.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if this is a setup,” Weichel said about Bulger’s murder. “That’s a lot of coincidences there. I don’t believe in coincidences.”

Mob experts have also pointed out that two other New England gangland rivals of Bulger were also locked up in the Hazelton prison: “Cadillac Frank” Salemme and Paul Weadick, who were recently convicted for the killing in 1993 of a Boston nightclub owner.

But even if Bulger’s death was facilitated by federal law enforcement officials who were worried that Bulger might try to embarrass the bureau for a second time, it’s unlikely the world will ever know for sure.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2CVSvW6 Tyler Durden

Stocks Slammed Into Red As Apple Tumbles, Trade Deal Hopes Evaporate

After a brief bounce this morning, Apple is trading down over 7% and back below the trillion-dollar market cap level

(yes we know new shares outstanding are imminent)

This has weighed on an already weak market as hopes for a China trade deal evaporate…

Three senior administration officials now telling me there is no indication of an imminent trade deal with China. Options are always being discussed behind the scenes, but no significant progress, I’m told.

With cash markets finding some support…

As Yuan continues to leak lower…

via RSS https://ift.tt/2PzIeWc Tyler Durden

Lacalle: “The Question Is Not If, But When” The Next Financial Crisis Strikes

Authored by Daniel Lacalle via Dlacalle.com,

We have been reading numerous comments recently about a forthcoming recession and the next crisis, particularly on the tenth anniversary of the collapse of Lehman Brothers.

The question is not whether there will be a crisis, but when. In the past fifty years, we have seen more than eight global crises and many more local ones, so the likelihood of another one is quite high. Not just because of the years passed since the 2007 crisis, but because the factors that drive a global crisis are all lining up.

What drives a financial crisis? Three factors.

  • Demand-side policies that lead investors and citizens to believe that there is no risk. Complacency and excess risk-taking cannot happen without the existence of a widespread belief that there is some safety net, a government or central bank cushion that will support risky assets. Terms like “search for yield” and “financial repression” come precisely from artificial demand signals created from monetary and political forces.

  • Excessive risk-taking in assets that are perceived as risk-free or bullet-proof. It is impossible to build a bubble on an asset where investors and companies see an extraordinary risk. It must happen under the belief that there is no risk attached to rising valuations because “this time is different”, “fundamentals have changed” or “there is a new paradigm”, sentences we have all hears more times than we should in the past years.

  • The realization that this time is not different. Bubbles do not burst because of one catalyst, as we are told to believe. The 2007-2008 did not start because of Lehman, it was just a symptom of a much wider problem that had started to burst in small doses months before. Excess leverage to a growth cycle that fails to materialize as the consensus expected.

What are the main factors that could trigger the next financial crisis?

  • Sovereign Debt. The riskiest asset today is sovereign bonds at abnormally low yields, compressed by central bank policies. With $6.5 trillion in negative-yielding bonds, the nominal and real losses in pension funds will likely be added to the losses in other asset classes.

  • Incorrect perception of liquidity and VaR (Value at Risk). Years of high asset correlation and synchronized bubble led by sovereign debt have led investors to believe that there is always a massive amount of liquidity waiting to buy the dips to catch the rally. This is simply a myth. That “massive liquidity” is just leverage and when margin calls and losses start to appear in different areas -emerging markets, European equities, US tech stocks- the liquidity that most investors count on to continue to fuel the rally simply vanishes. Why? Because VaR (value at risk) is also incorrectly calculated. When assets reach an abnormal level of correlation and volatility is dampened due to massive central bank asset purchases, the analysis of risk and probable losses is simply ineffective, because when markets fall they fall in tandem, as we are seeing these days, and the historical analysis of losses is contaminated by the massive impact of monetary policy actions in those years. When the biggest driver of asset price inflation, central banks, starts to unwind or simply becomes part of the expected liquidity -like in Japan-, the placebo effect of monetary policy on risky assets vanishes. And losses pile up.

The fallacy of synchronized growth triggered the beginning of what could lead to the next recession. A generalized belief that monetary policy had been very effective, growth was robust and generalized, and debt increases where just a collateral damage but not a global concern. And with the fallacy of synchronised growth came the excess complacency and the acceleration of imbalances. The 2007 crisis erupted because in 2005 and 2006 even the most prudent investors gave up and surrendered to the rising-market beta chase. In 2017 it was accelerated by the incorrect belief that emerging markets were fine because their stocks and bonds were soaring despite the Federal reserve normalization.

What will the next crisis look like?

Nothing like the last one, in my opinion. Contagion is much more difficult because there have been some lessons learnt from the Lehman crisis. There are stronger mechanisms to avoid a widespread domino effect in the banking system.

When the biggest bubble is sovereign debt the crisis we face is not one of the massive financial market losses and real economy contagion, but a slow fall in asset prices, as we are seeing, and global stagnation.

The next crisis is not likely to be another Lehman, but another Japan, a widespread zombification of global economies to avoid the pain of a large re-pricing of sovereign bonds, that leads to massive tax hikes to pay the rising interests, economic recession and unemployment.

The risks are obviously difficult to analyse because the world entered into the biggest monetary experiment in history with no understanding of the side effects and real risks attached. Governments and central banks saw rising markets above fundamental levels and record levels of debt as collateral damages, small but acceptable problems in the quest for a synchronised growth that was never going to happen.

The next crisis, like the 2007-08 one, will be blamed on a symptom (Lehman in that case), not the real cause (aggressive monetary policy incentivising risk-taking and penalising prudence). The next crisis, however, will find central banks with almost no real tools to disguise structural problems with liquidity, and no fiscal space in a world where most economies are running fiscal deficits for the tenth consecutive year and global debt is at all-time highs.

When will it happen? We do not know, but if the warning signs of 2018 are not taken seriously, it will likely occur earlier than expected. But the governments and central banks will not blame themselves, they will present themselves -again- as the solution.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2DjqQiO Tyler Durden

Where The Jobs Were In October: Who’s Hiring And Who Isn’t

After a disappointing payrolls report last month, which was downward revised to 118K jobs mostly due to a hurricane impacting hiring and resulting in a sharp drop in retail and hospitality jobs, October was the payback month with many of the jobs “lost” in September coming back and headline payrolls printing at 250K, 50,000 more than the 200K expected.

Notably, it was not just last month’s hurricane which impacted the data, but also last year’s duo of Hurricanes which negatively impacted hourly earnings in Oct 2017 as SouthBay Research notes. It was this weakness that created the “base effect” wage spike this month, resulting in the artificially high 3.1% average hourly earnings print, the highest since April 2009.

Hurricanes aside, the job market continues to grow at a blistering pace with the following key highlights of greatest impact:

  • Manufacturing has soared with +296,000 jobs added this year
  • Construction wages +4.2%, beating overall 3.1% rate (best in nearly a decade)
  • Lowest Hispanic unemployment rate ever

To be sure, much of this overheating in the US labor market is the result of Trump’s fiscal stimulus, whose impact will soon begin to fade at a rapid pace as payback time comes. Until then, however, the labor market remains especially strong  – in fact not a single major category saw a drop in employment – with the following industries especially hot right now:

  • Employment in the well-paying professional and business services increased by 35,000.
  • Health care employment rose by 36,000 as hospitals added 13,000 jobs, and employment in ambulatory health care services continued to trend up, +14,000.
  • Employment in transportation and warehousing rose by 24,000. Job gains occurred in warehousing and storage (+8,000) and in couriers and messengers (+8,000).
  • Construction employment continued to trend up in October, up +33,000.
  • Employment in manufacturing continued to trend up in September, rising +18,000
  • Employment in mining, employment in support activities for mining rose by +5,000

And visually:

Looking over the past year, the following charts from Bloomberg show the industries with the highest and lowest rates of employment growth for the prior year. The latest month’s figures are highlighted.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2AGLNlc Tyler Durden