100 billion reasons to have non-reportable assets

In early March 1938 in a dusty corner of the Arabian desert, Max Steineke finally had the breakthrough he was hoping for.

Steineke was the chief geologist for the California Arabian Standard Oil Company (CASOC), a venture owned by what we know today as Chevron.

And he hadn’t had a lot of success despite years of effort.

Steinke was convinced that massive oil reserves were beneath the sands. He just couldn’t find any.

His prized oil well, what was called Dammam #7, had been riddled with mishaps, accidents, and delays, and it was costing the company a LOT of money.

Steinke was about to be shut down when, finally, on March 4, the well started gushing. And Saudi Arabia was never the same.

Today oil constitutes more than half of Saudi Arabia’s GDP and more than 90% of government revenue… and it is the reason why Saudi Arabia is one of the world’s richest nations as measured by per-capita GDP.

But all that success also comes with risk: what happens when the wells run dry? Or when the oil price falls?

That’s what they’re dealing with now.

Saudi Arabia has been in and out of recession over the past few years due to the steep decline in oil prices. And the government is desperate to raise revenue.

Last year the Saudi government announced “Vision 2030,” a long-term plan to diversify its economy and reduce dependence on oil revenue.

The plan includes developments like a new beach resort on the Red Sea where women will be allowed to wear bikinis. This is pretty forward thinking, folks.

The government also announced that it will sell a portion of the national oil company, Saudi Aramco, through an IPO on a major stock exchange– a move they believe will generate $100 billion for the government.

But none of these options fixes the short-term problem. Saudi Arabia needs cash. Now.

So over the past few weeks they’ve found their source: theft.

Under the guise of a ‘corruption crackdown’, the government of Saudi Arabia has arrested hundreds of its wealthiest, most prominent citizens, and frozen more than 1700 bank accounts.

The government claims that these men illegally acquired their wealth through graft and corruption.

Now, to be fair, it’s true that there’s an enormous amount of corruption in Saudi Arabia.

I lived in Riyadh years ago when I was a young intelligence officer, and the corruption was obvious from Day 1.

For example, I remember mid-level Saudi army officers explaining how they would accept bribes and kickbacks to award small contracts to local suppliers.

These were military commanders who were essentially stealing from their own units.

For us it was unthinkable. But for them it was normal. They discussed it openly with each other, as if they were trading tips on how to steal even more.

Saudi billionaire Prince al Waleed (one of the people who has been arrested) also used to speak quite candidly about how he made his initial fortune through bribes and kickbacks.

So it’s clear that a lot of people in Saudi Arabia have made money in illicit ways.

It does strike me as a farce, though, to see extremely corrupt bureaucrats and politicians arresting corrupt businessmen… and then confining them to the very swanky Ritz Carlton hotel in Riyadh.

The timing is also suspect– the Saudi government needs the money and cannot afford to wait for their long-term plans to generate income.

They’ve already started borrowing pretty heavily, issuing close to $40 billion of debt in a single year– that’s a big chunk for a country with a $650 billion GDP.

But they know they can’t keep borrowing forever… hence the ‘anti-corruption purge.’

They’re now telling their captives that they’ll be free to go if they ‘voluntarily donate’ 70% of their wealth to the government.

Estimates vary for the amount of money the government will bring in through this theft; the lowest amount I’ve seen is $100 billion (again, an enormous sum in Saudi Arabia).

The Wall Street Journal reported that the Saudi government is targeting as much as $800 billion… an amount that’s larger than the entire Saudi economy.

To put that number in context, it would be like the US government seizing $22+ trillion of Americans’ wealth– more than the value of every company listed on the New York Stock Exchange combined.

All of this, naturally, is taking place without any trial or due process. They’re just seizing and freezing assets.

If you’re thinking, “Thank goodness I live in a free country where that would never happen,” think again.

This is really no different than Civil Asset Forfeiture in the Land of the Free, the legal framework where countless federal, state, and local agencies have the authority to seize and freeze every asset you own without even so much as charging you with a crime.

(They can even take your kids away!)

I think there’s a pretty big lesson here: desperate governments almost invariably resort to stealing from their own citizens.

And that’s why one step in a Plan B is to have some non-reportable assets.

The government knows about every local bank account you’ve opened. They know what’s in your domestic brokerage account. Or what real estate you own.

And they can seize it all in a heartbeat.

So it’s a good idea to have a few assets that they don’t know about… assets that you’re not legally required to tell them about– like an offshore bank account.

This includes things like physical cash, precious metals, and yes, cryptocurrency.

You won’t be worse off for having some non-reportable assets– especially cash.

Think about it– it won’t make a difference if there’s $20,000 in your bank account or in your safe. It’s not like the banks pay interest anyhow.

But if the worst happens, this emergency savings could be a life-saver.

Source

from Sovereign Man http://ift.tt/2AXlLr8
via IFTTT

Gold Drops To Key Technical Support After $2 Billion Purge

After surging above its 50-day moving-average on Friday, it appears someone is keen for that key technical level not to hold as they dumped almost $2 billion notional in seconds this morning, testing down to the 50DMA (but holding for now).

15,000 contracts dumped in under two minutes… but for now the 50DMA is holding…

 

The Dollar Index has been flying around after the Merkel headlines over the weekend…

via http://ift.tt/2AWKE6q Tyler Durden

George Responds To Hungary’s “Massive Anti-Soros Propaganda Effort”

Over the past several months we’ve frequently noted the devolving relationship between Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and billionaire financier George Soros.  Tensions escalated last month when Orban took it upon himself to mail a Soros-related questionnaire to all 8 million Hungarian voters (see: Hungary Launches Anti-Soros Political Campaign) and then followed that up with an announcement that Hungary’s intelligence services had been instructed to “map” Soros’ network of influence.

As Orban’s ruling party gears up for parliamentary elections in April – where it is the prohibitive favorite to win largely thanks to its refusal to accept refugees under a plan devised by the European Commission – the prime minister has instructed his intelligence services to map what he described as the networks run by the billionaire financier’s “empire” targeting his country, Bloomberg reported.

 

Intelligence agencies will help evaluate what he sees as efforts by Soros to get Hungary punished by EU institutions pursuing a “mixed-population” continent, Orban said in an interview with Kossuth Radio on Friday.

 

The Associated Press added that the investigation will also focus on alleged Hungarian members of the network.

 

Intelligence agencies will help evaluate what Orban sees as efforts by Soros to get Hungary punished by EU institutions pursuing a “mixed-population” continent, Orban said in an interview with Kossuth Radio on Friday.

Today, Soros has decided to strike back with a scathing “rebuttal” posted to his website blasting Orban for his “anti-Soros, anti-Muslim, anti-Semitic propaganda effort.”

On October 9, 2017, the Hungarian government mailed a national consultation to all eight million eligible Hungarian voters purporting to solicit their opinions about a so-called “Soros Plan.” The statements in the national consultation contain distortions and outright lies that deliberately mislead Hungarians about George Soros’s views on migrants and refugees. Hungarian government officials also falsely claim that George Soros is somehow controlling the European Union decision-making process. In fact, decisions on how to address the migration crisis are made by EU member states and institutions, including the Hungarian government.

 

With Hungary’s health care and education systems in distress and corruption rife, the current government has sought to create an outside enemy to distract citizens. The government selected George Soros for this purpose, launching a massive anti-Soros media campaign costing tens of millions of euros in taxpayer money, stoking anti-Muslim sentiment, and employing anti-Semitic tropes reminiscent of the 1930s. The national consultation is part of an ongoing propaganda effort that has been underway since May 2015 that included the “Stop Brussels” consultation in the spring of 2017 and the referendum that vilified migrants and refugees in 2016.

Sorros

Soros went on to offer a “rebuttal”, which in several cases read more like a confirmation, of Orban’s “propaganda”:

National Consultation Statement 1: George Soros wants Brussels to resettle at least one million immigrants per year onto European Union territory, including in Hungary.

 

Soros Response: FALSE.  In a 2015 opinion piece, George Soros said that because of the war in Syria, the European Union would have to “accept at least a million asylum-seekers annually for the foreseeable future. And, to do that, it must share the burden fairly” (“Rebuilding the Asylum System,” Project Syndicate, September 26, 2015). A year later, when circumstances had changed, he suggested that the EU should make a “commitment to admit even a mere 300,000 refugees annually” (“Saving Refugees to Save Europe,” Project Syndicate, September 12, 2016).

 

National Consultation Statement 2: Together with officials in Brussels, George Soros is planning to dismantle border fences in EU member states, including in Hungary, to open the borders for immigrants.

 

Soros Response: FALSE. George Soros has clearly stated his belief that “the EU must regain control of its borders.” He believes that “the EU must build common mechanisms for protecting borders, determining asylum claims, and relocating refugees.” (“Saving Refugees to Save Europe,” Project Syndicate, September 12, 2016).

 

National Consultation Statement 3: One part of the Soros Plan is to use Brussels to force the EU-wide distribution of immigrants that have accumulated in Western Europe, with special focus on Eastern European countries. Hungary must also take part in this.

 

Soros Response: FALSE. In his most recent commentary on the refugee crisis, George Soros endorsed “a voluntary matching mechanism for relocating refugees.” He made clear that “the EU cannot coerce member states to accept refugees they do not want, or refugees to go where they are not wanted.” (“Saving Refugees to Save Europe,” Project Syndicate, September 12, 2016).

 

National Consultation Statement 4: Based on the Soros Plan, Brussels should force all EU member states, including Hungary, to pay immigrants HUF 9 million (€28,000) in welfare.

 

Soros Response: FALSE. George Soros did not say that Hungary should be forced to pay HUF 9 million in welfare to immigrants. He did say, “Adequate financing is critical. The EU should provide €15,000 per asylum-seeker for each of the first two years to help cover housing, health care, and education costs—and to make accepting refugees more appealing to member states.” (“Rebuilding the Asylum System,” Project Syndicate, September 26, 2015). This would clearly be a subsidy from the EU to the Hungarian government. Last year George Soros announced that he would contribute to the financial effort by earmarking €430 million of his personal fortune “for investments that specifically address the needs of migrants, refugees and host communities.” (“Why I’m Investing $500 Million in Migrants,” The Wall Street Journal, September 20, 2016).

 

National Consultation Statement 5: Another goal of George Soros is to make sure that migrants receive milder criminal sentences for the crimes they commit.

 

Soros Response:  FALSE. Nowhere has Soros made any such statement. This is a lie.

 

National Consultation Statement 6: The goal of the Soros Plan is to push the languages and cultures of Europe into the background so that integration of illegal immigrants happens much more quickly.

 

Soros Response: FALSE. Nowhere has Soros made any such statement. This is a lie.

 

National Consultation Statement 7: It is also part of the Soros Plan to initiate political attacks against those countries which oppose immigration, and to severely punish them.

 

Soros Response: FALSE. Nowhere has Soros made any such statement. This is a lie.

Of course, as we’ve noted before, three decades ago, billionaire financier George Soros paid for a young Viktor Orbán to study in Britain. And as recently as 2010, Soros donated $1 million to Orbán’s government to help the cleanup effort following the infamous “red sludge” disaster.

But the once-warm relationship between the two men has deteriorated substantially over the past seven years, as Orban has drifted further to the right. In 2014, the leader of Hungary’s Fidesz party declared he would seek to model Hungary’s government after “illiberal” democracies like the government of Russian President Vladimir Putin. In response, Soros this summer denounced his former protege and accused him of creating a “mafia state” in Hungary.

One of dozens of billboards around Hungary bearing anti-Soros messaging…

Orban responded by accusing Soros’s network of using the European Union to achieve its own aims, including the promotion of mass migration into Europe.

Orban was no doubt provoked to launch the probe by reports Soros has donated $18 billion from his family office to his “Open Society” foundation, his primary tool for influence policy throughout the west. The group funds a network of dozens of organizations that fund liberal, globalist causes throughout Europe and the US. At times, recipients of funding have included Black Lives Matter groups, and even Antifa.

But will Orban’s investigation morph into a full-on, Turkey-style purge of anyone with ties to Soros’ linked organizations, regardless of their actual complicity? That, of course, remains to be seen.

via http://ift.tt/2z3pS4x Tyler Durden

Key Events In The Coming Holiday-Shortened Week

It’s a relatively quiet, holiday-shortened (in the US) week, in which volumes are expected to grind lower as we head into the Thanksgiving holiday.

In the US, existing home sales will be reported on Tues, expected to edge up to 5.4mn saar in Oct from 5.39mn in Sep. One day later, we get the durable goods orders (exp. increase to 0.3% in Oct, slowing from 2.0% in each of the previous two months). Also on Wednesday, the FOMC minutes should reveal a committee that is preparing for another hike before year-end with a generally upbeat assessment of the economy. Chair Yellen will offer remarks in a conversational setting with former Governor of the BOE Mervyn King on Tues.

Elsewhere, on Wed, U.K. Chancellor Hammond presents the UK budget to parliament. A worsening fiscal outlook in the Budget on productivity forecast downgrades and pressure to ease austerity will likely mean an early end to the BOE’s tightening plans. BofA forecasts a cumulative increase of £46bn in borrowing between 2017-2021. In the short term the news on borrowing should be positive, reflecting recent resilient tax revenues. In the medium term productivity misery dominates. Risks are skewed to more fiscal worsening in future budgets.

Here is a breakdown of key global events on a day to day basis, courtesy of DB’s Jim Reid

  • Monday: The main focus on Monday will likely be the EU foreign and European affairs ministers discussing Brexit, followed by a briefing from the bloc’s chief negotiator Michel Barnier. The location for the European Banking Authority is also to be decided. Away from that, ECB President Mario Draghi is scheduled to attend a hearing at European Parliament in the afternoon, while the ECB’s Nowotny, Lautenschlaeger and Constancio are also due to speak through the day. The only data release of note is the US conference board’s leading index for October.
  • Tuesday: Central bank speakers will likely be the centre of attention again with Fed Chair Yellen due to speak late in the evening as part of a series with former BoE governor Mervyn King, while the ECB’s Coeure chairs a panel in Frankfurt in the afternoon. Datawise, UK public sector net borrowing and CBI trends data for October and November is due, while in the US the Chicago Fed national activity index and existing home sales data for October is due.
  • Wednesday: The big focus on Wednesday in the UK will be Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond’s Budget statement in Parliament, due at midday. In the evening we will also receive the FOMC minutes from the latest monetary policy meeting. Datawise, the most significant release of note is the flash October durable and capital goods orders data in the US. The latest weekly initial jobless claims data is also due along with the final November University of Michigan consumer sentiment reading.
  • Thursday: With it being Thanksgiving in the US, both bond and stock markets will remain closed across the pond. It’s a fairly packed schedule in Europe however, highlighted by the release of the November flash PMIs for the Euro area, Germany and France. The final Q3 GDP report is also due in Germany while in the UK we’ll get the second reading. ECB speakers on Thursday include Villeroy and Coeure while the ECB minutes from the last policy meeting are also due.
  • Friday: A quiet end to the week. The flash November manufacturing PMI in Japan will be out overnight, while in Germany we’ll receive the November IFO survey. In the US we’ll receive the flash November PMIs. Black Friday also marks the traditional start of the US holiday shopping season. One other event potentially keeping an eye on is S&P and Moody’s scheduled sovereign rating reviews of South Africa, with the country at risk of losing its investment grade status. The ECB’s Supervisory chair Ms Nouy will also speak today.

Finally, Goldman focuses on key US events, alongside consensus forecasts.

The key economic releases this week are the minutes from the October 31-November 1 FOMC meeting and the durable goods orders report, both on Wednesday. There is one speaking engagement with Chair Yellen this week.

Monday, November 20

  • There are no major economic data releases.

Tuesday, November 21

  • 10:00 AM Existing home sales, October (GS +1.5%, consensus +0.2%, last +0.7%): We estimate existing home sales rose 1.5% in October (mom sa), adding to the 0.7% post-hurricane rebound that began in September. Our forecast reflects a further improvement in regional housing data tracking closed homes sales. Existing home sales are an input into the brokers’ commissions component of residential investment in the GDP report.
  • 06:00 PM Fed Chair Yellen (FOMC voter) speaks: Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen will participate in a moderated conversation with Mervyn King at an event hosted by New York University’s Stern School of Business. Audience Q&A is expected.

Wednesday, November 22 :

  • 8:30 AM Initial jobless claims, week ended November 18 (GS 240k, consensus 240k, last 249k); Continuing jobless claims, week ended November 11 (consensus 1,879k, last 1,860k): We estimate initial jobless claims declined 9k to 240k in the week ended November 18 after rising to a six-week high in the previous week. Our forecast reflects a likely pullback in California and New York from elevated levels, partially offset by a further rise in Puerto Rico tied to the aftermath of Hurricane Maria. Continuing claims – the number of persons receiving benefits through standard programs – fell sharply in the previous week, and are trending lower.

    08:30 AM Durable goods orders, October preliminary (GS -1.0%, consensus +0.4%, last +2.0%); Durable goods orders, ex-transportation, October preliminary (GS +0.5%, consensus +0.5%, last +0.7%); Core capital goods orders, October preliminary (GS +0.3%, consensus +0.6%, last +1.7%); Core capital goods shipments, October preliminary (GS +0.3%, consensus +0.3%, last +0.9%): We expect durable goods orders to pull back 1.0% in the October report (mom sa), reflecting a drop in commercial aircraft orders and a moderate increase in core measures. Industrial production of business equipment rose a firm 0.5% in the month, and broader manufacturing trends remain solid on net, despite some modest deterioration in manufacturing surveys November-to-date. Accordingly, we forecast a 0.3% increase in both orders and shipments of core capital goods, and we estimate a 0.5% rise in durable goods orders ex-transportation.

  • 10:00 AM University of Michigan consumer sentiment, November final (GS 98.3, consensus 98.0, last 97.8): We expect a modest rebound in the final reading of the University of Michigan consumer sentiment index for November (+0.5pt to 98.3), reflecting sequential improvement in higher frequency consumer surveys. The preliminary report’s measure of 5- to 10-year ahead inflation expectations remained stable at 2.5% in the preliminary reading, near the middle of its 12-month range.
  • 02:00 PM Minutes from the October 31- November 1 FOMC meeting: The November FOMC meeting upgraded the growth assessment to “solid” for the first time since January 2015, but it did add that core inflation “remained soft”. In the minutes, we will look for further discussion of the growth and inflation data.

Thursday, November 23

  • Thanksgiving holiday. NYSE closed. SIFMA recommends bond markets also close.

Friday, November 24

  • NYSE will close early at 1:00 PM. SIFMA recommends an early 2:00 PM close to bond markets.
  • 09:45 AM Markit Flash US Manufacturing PMI, November preliminary (consensus 55.0, last 54.6)
  • 09:45 AM Markit Flash US Services PMI, November preliminary (consensus 55.4, last 55.3)

Source: BofA, DB, Goldman

via http://ift.tt/2AflPq5 Tyler Durden

Turkish Lira, Bonds Crash As ‘Secret Gold Trade’ Trial Begins, Implicates Leaders

For the first time in history, Turkish 10Y bond yields topped 13% this morning and the currency just plunged to a new record low against the dollar as the trial of the gold-trader at the center of the "secret gold trade" with Iran begins today and looks set to implicate Turkish leadership as we warned.

For full background on this stunning case, read here.

As Bloomberg reports, Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Bekir Bozdag is furious…

The U.S. case against Turkish-Iranian gold trader Reza Zarrab “has no legal basis."

 

The trial is nothing more than an execution through the U.S., of the “unsuccessful Dec. 17-25 coup attempt in Turkey,” by Fetullah Gulen’s organization, referring to a corruption probe in 2013 that was quashed

And according to Ilnur Cevik, a senior adviser to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, U.S. attorneys and the judge overseeing the trial have accepted illegally obtained and tampered information as evidence.

There is an attempt to implicate Turkish leaders in the case, Cevik says in remarks on state-run TRT news radio.

 

Cevik then stated that Preet Bharara, the former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, “is the one who prepared this plot” and he is linked to Gulen, who is accused of masterminding last year’s failed coup attempt in Turkey, adding that Bharara’s successor Joon H. Kim is now continuing case in same manner.

 

Both prosecution and judge are linked to FETO, Cevik says (referring to the Turkish govt’s term for people affiliated with Gulen’s network that it considers a terrorist organization).

The case is an effort by Gulenists to come after Turkish govt after last year’s failed coup attempt, he added, saying:

U.S. Justice Dept. should immediately intervene in the case if it wants to “avoid disgrace.”

 

“The court of the Southern District of New York is seized by the people of FETO. Where is justice in this trial?”

Quite some accusations for innocent men?

And the impact of this uncertainty is clear. The Lira is tumbling to new record lows against the dollar – extending losses following Erdogan's anti central-bank-independence comments last week…

 

And Turkish 10Y Bond Yields topped 13% for the first time in history…

It seems time's up for delaying this…

“The Zarrab case is the one to watch in terms of U.S.-Turkey relations,” Tim Ash, a London-based strategist for BlueBay Asset Management LLP, said in an email to clients.

 

“Zarrab is thought to have been close to the Erdogan family and, indeed, he was given Turkish citizenship, alongside Iranian. This is a real stress point."

As Bloomberg notes, Erdogan tried to pressure U.S. officials during the Barack Obama and Donald Trump administrations to drop the prosecution of the trader and has complained in public comments that prosecutors were trying to extract a confession from Zarrab and turn him into an informant. He also claimed President Trump apologized for the prosecution in a phone call.

via http://ift.tt/2j9vfrT Tyler Durden

Inflation and Counterfeit Credit, Report 19 Nov 2017

Let’s take a look at an often-repeated idea that is popular in the gold and alternative investing communities. The government possesses a printing press. Therefore, it will never default. It will just inflate its way out of the debt. It will devalue the dollar.

The government does not set the value of the dollar. And it has no mechanism to set it. So, logically, it has no mechanism to reset it. It cannot devalue it. In the same way, you cannot lower yourself down by your bootstraps since you are not lifting yourself up by them in the first place.

We must emphatically state that the government does not print. It borrows. Congress does not have a printing press, to create greenbacks. It has a Treasury that can sell bonds to cover whatever payments the government is obligated to make that it has not got tax revenues for. Over the past year, for example, the government increased its debt by over 630 billion dollars.

This leads us to inflation. We have a different view than the mainstream. We define inflation as the counterfeiting of credit. In legitimate credit, the borrower has both the means and intent to repay. But clearly in the case of perpetual government deficits, these elements are lacking. This is inflation. Not the changes that may result to consumer prices. Not the change in quantity of dollars. The fraud itself is the root of it, and therefore properly deserves the moniker inflation.

The Federal Reserve, of course, is a key participant in this monetary inflation scheme. Does the Fed have a printing press? Does the Fed print?

Like any bank, the Fed borrows to fund its purchases of interest-paying assets. It earns a spread between what it pays (currently about 1.25%) and what its asset portfolio pays (over 2%). The commercial banks currently deposit over $2.1 trillion in excess reserves, and the Fed’s total liabilities are over $4.4 trillion including Federal Reserve Notes (on which the Fed pays zero). Unlike any commercial bank, there is a law that obligates us to treat the Fed’s liabilities as if they were money.

This last fact is what makes the inflationary scheme so dangerous (not the possible effect on consumer prices). The Fed borrows to lend to the government (and manipulate the interest rate). This means: the Fed’s liability, the dollar, is only good so long as the Fed’s asset, which is the government’s liability, is good. Please re-read that and think. This one statement is the undoing of much of modern monetary economics.

Of course, with the Fed’s liability being treated as money by nearly everyone—including those who oppose the existence of the Fed, and who speculate on alternative monetary assets like gold and bitcoin—the Fed is in a unique position. Demand for its liability is unlimited. That is, whatever it wants to borrow, willing lenders are lined up. Not only that, it gets better!

Last week, we said:

So let’s say you are a farmer in Iowa. What can you do about your debt? Grow and sell more wheat. That is, sell wheat at the bid price.

Suppose you are a restaurateur with 5 burger joints. What can you do? Cook and sell more burgers. That is, sell burgers on the bid.

If you are a recent college graduate, with college loans to pay off, what can you do? Work and sell more of your labor. That is, dump labor on the bid.

And we wonder what supports the value of the dollar! It is the struggles of the debtors. Every debtor is busily working to increase the quantity of every kind of good and service, which is dumped on the bid. Dumping on the bid tends to push the bid down.

People are not merely lined up to lend to the Fed, they are outdoing each other, frantically bidding up the Fed’s paper! This is because they, themselves, have borrowed and obligated themselves to repaying their own debts in the same said paper. To service their debts, they must sell goods and services.

And people wonder why little to no inflation. They are thinking only of the quantity of dollars, and assuming that as quantity goes up so must prices. However, a system which is sinking deeper into debt has dynamics that cause a different outcome.

So this brings us to the premise where we started: the government will just inflate its way out of the debt. The government can borrow more, but will this devalue the dollar?

Instead of reiterating a point we have covered above and in previous parts of this series, let’s look at a seemingly unrelated observation about markets. When all participants count on the same outcome, when they are all all-in, when they are all on one side of the boat hoping for this outcome, then you can count on the opposite outcome that all the participants are counting on.

The government is in debt up to its eyeballs, the banks, the corporations, the small businesses, the homeowners, the students, the car owners, and even the consumers with credit cards and the former students who attended university in the last decade or two. Everyone owes. Everyone relentlessly bids on the dollar with whatever they have.

The outcome they all count on is: the dollar will go down. That is not the outcome they are getting, or will get.

We realize that many people think the good goes up and the bad goes down. That is why they expect gold to be $65,000. We are not saying the dollar is good. Quite the contrary. We do not use the words counterfeiting and fraud to mean anything good. We are saying that when government applies perverse incentives, then you get perverse outcomes.

A rising dollar is a perverse outcome.

We are working on the problem that all borrowing and lending uses the dollar. We offer gold financing, simplified and a yield on gold, paid in gold.


The price of gold went up $19, and the price of silver 42 cents. The price action occurred on Monday, Wednesday and Friday though so far, only the first two price jumps reversed. We promise to take a look at the intraday action on Friday.

But first, we want to clarify something in light of our ongoing commentary about the struggles of the debtors and the lack of drivers for rising consumer prices. Just because farmers and restaurateurs are frantically producing and selling like mad, which results in soft prices, does not mean that people cannot begin to buy gold in earnest again.

There is not a causal relationship between consumer prices and the price of gold. At times, they can be highly correlated, but then the correlation ends. For example, did you know that the age of Miss America correlated with the number of murders by steam and hot things for 10 years? Let’s look at a chart.

NB: we had to put the two numbers, change in consumer prices and change in gold price on two different axes. Though both are percentage changes, gold changes are so much larger that if plotted on the same axis, consumer prices look almost a flatline.

You can see a tantalizing relationship between the two traces, at least for a time. At first (we began the graph in 1971 when President Nixon cut the dollar loose from gold), there is a striking correlation.

But then there is a marked change post-1981, and if there is a correlation (we have not done the math), it looks much more tenuous. This is when Reagan and Volcker beat inflation (in the mainstream Narrative), or objectively when interest began to fall, when marginal productivity of debt began its uncanny correlation with interest (which we believe is causal), and when yield purchasing power begins to show a kind of hyperinflation.

Offhand, we can think of two reasons to buy and own gold: participate in speculative mania and avoid default risk. Right now speculative mania is occurring in crypto currencies so that may (but not necessarily, beware correlation!) shunt such capital flows away from gold. As to default risk, there are signs of rising stress in high yield credit markets, but it’s early yet.

Here are the charts of the prices of gold and silver, and the gold-silver ratio.

Next, this is a graph of the gold price measured in silver, otherwise known as the gold to silver ratio. The ratio fell.

In this graph, we show both bid and offer prices for the gold-silver ratio. If you were to sell gold on the bid and buy silver at the ask, that is the lower bid price. Conversely, if you sold silver on the bid and bought gold at the offer, that is the higher offer price.

For each metal, we will look at a graph of the basis and cobasis overlaid with the price of the dollar in terms of the respective metal. It will make it easier to provide brief commentary. The dollar will be represented in green, the basis in blue and cobasis in red.

Here is the gold graph showing gold basis and cobasis with the price of the dollar in gold terms.

We switched from the December to February contracts.

The cobasis (our measure of scarcity) of the Feb contract does not show much. Let’s take a look at the continuous basis.

Here, we do see a tracking with the price of the dollar (inverse of the price of gold, in dollar terms). So what’s going on? Why does the near basis not show what the continuous basis does?

Here is a graph of all the contracts.

We see a noticeable widening of the spread between near and far contracts. This is a steepening of the forward curve. At the end of August, there was less than 20bps difference between the Feb 2018 and Feb 2019 contracts. Now, there is 65bps, and 35bps between Apr 2018 and Feb 2019 contracts.

When a price changes, it may or may not be significant (which is rather the meta-point of this Report). But one thing is for sure. When a spread changes, it is telling you something. What is this telling us?

Since bottoming about a month ago, farther-out contracts have a rising basis. The Feb contract, by contrast, does not. We think it’s a bit early for the contract roll dynamics (and this is gold, not silver, which generally waits longer).

The obvious answer is that speculators are bidding these contracts up. But in this case, it is not relative to spot but relative to the near contract. We are skeptical that speculators would suddenly switch their preference longer-dated contracts.

We don’t know the answer but we suspect it may be the lifting of hedges either in the gold mining sector, or perhaps more likely, the bullion dealers. We know that retail product premia are low, due to low retail demand. It seems plausible that dealers would reduce their hedge positions. Since hedging involves buying physical metal product and selling futures (which tends to compress the basis), lifting a hedge involves selling the product and buying the futures. Which tends to push the basis up, and not necessarily the near contract basis. The basis of whichever contracts were used for hedging. It could be longer contracts.

We welcome reader input to explain this phenomenon.

Now let’s look at silver.

The story is the same in silver. The graph below of all the silver contracts shows some widening of the spread between near and far contracts but not to the same magnitude as gold.

In contrast to gold, the basis is flat across all the silver contracts with possibly some increase developing in the further out contracts from November onwards.

Now, on to Friday’s spike. Is it like last Friday’s crash, i.e. speculators repositioning?

In Part II of this article, we show intraday graphs for both metals.

 

© 2017 Monetary Metals

via http://ift.tt/2mKBNm3 Monetary Metals

“Merkel Will Have To Go”: Bill Blain On What’s Next For The Germans

“When you turn an election into a three-ring circus, there is the possibility the dancing bear will win..”

After Sunday night’s shocking failure by Merkel to from a government (triggered by the Free Democrats walking out due to irreconcilable differences on refugee policy, energy policy and tax policy) the FT was quick to conclude that “Merkel faces worst political crisis of her career.” And while Merkel is certainly in hot water, a more appropriate question is what’s next for Germany.

According to UBS – which has a clear interested in preserving the calm – there are four possible scenarios:

First, Chancellor Merkel could try to re-engage with the FDP and bring it back to the table and start coalition talks. Second, the CDU/CSU could try to approach the SPD to form a grand coalition, which would have an absolute majority. However, the SPD has repeatedly mentioned (again last night) that it is not willing to go for this option and prefers to be in opposition. If these two options do not work (which would be the first time in post-war Germany), either a minority government (Chancellor Merkel dismissed this option on election night) or new elections could follow. The procedure for new elections, however, involves several steps, as outlined below.

The current (grand coalition) government remains in place until a new government is formed, i.e. until parliament votes on a candidate for chancellorship proposed by the Federal President (for which there is no time limit). If no workable coalition can be found, the way towards new elections involves many steps as reported in the press. The Federal President Steinmeier must propose a candidate for chancellorship (normally, this is the candidate put forth by a majority coalition, but he is free to choose others) and parliament would vote on this candidate. If the Federal President’s candidate does not obtain an absolute majority (which has never happened before in post-war Germany), parliament has 14 days to propose and vote on a candidate in a second round. If in this second round of voting no candidate obtains an absolute majority, there is a third round of voting where a candidate can be voted as chancellor with only a relative majority. If a candidate is voted with only a relative majority, the Federal President can either appoint the candidate as chancellor (implying a minority government) or dissolve parliament. In the latter case, new elections have to take place 60 days after parliament has been dissolved. At this stage, however, it is unclear whether new elections would
produce a significantly different result compared to the last election.

To be sure, UBS’ view is that no matter how bleak Merke’s “crisis” looks like, the fallout will likely be limited, to wit:

“even though the EUR dipped on the breakdown of the Jamaica talks, the broader market reaction has been contained. With Merkel’s acting government remaining in place, big political decisions on Brexit and EU issues anytime soon appear more difficult, including at the December Euro summit. If the grand coalition no longer remains an option, this could, in our view, lead to some risk-off pressure, the negative fallout for periphery markets (and a wider risk-off) should be contained.”

Perhaps: for UBS’ “calm and collected” outcome, the ECB may be forced to become more actively engaged in micromanaging risk again, something few have discussed yet. 

Which is why for a more practical and unbiased take we turn to Mint’s Bill Blain, who back in September correctly predicted just this eventuality, when everyone else said the odds are negligible. Here is Bill Blain with his take on “What’s next for the Germans.”

Ha. Macron must be creasing himself with laughter… I bet he struggled to keep a straight face as he commiserated with the (soon to depart?) Angela… Funny how the good news is all French these days…

 

And in Harare/Berlin an elderly befuddled leader doesn’t know if they are coming or going.

 

Despite triggering of Gotterdammerung, market reaction to the German electoral talks collapse is curiously muted – the Euro taken a minor spanking, and stock markets a tad-let lower.

 

I’m not really surprised at the lack of fireworks. Markets have become blasé about political noise – understanding how easy it is to over-react. It’s going to be a short holiday week, its year-end and folk are protecting what they’ve made this year. As one heads westwards, interest or cares in German politics diminishes pretty quickly? It’s just something that happens – Isn’t it?

 

Er.. actually…. what’s going on in Berlin is pretty important stuff. Or, at least it should be…

 

I’m trying to get my head round what happened and what cracked – it’s important to understand the collapse to work out what happens next… Last week chums in Berlin assured me it was a just a matter of time before Muti Merkel signed a new coalition deal. Over the weekend it all came apart.

 

It would seem the Greens and the Liberals just didn’t fancy the compromises and potential electoral suicide pact that underlies being Merkel’s stooges.

 

Back in September I warned the coalition process was likely to be far more difficult and fraxious than the market expected. I even said the chances of an outright failure to agree were as high as 50% – check out Porridge Extra Sept 25th. I was told I was a know nothing idiot (not disputing it!). But, I didn’t expect crisis this soon. My worst case was a second election triggered early next year – and Merkel squeezed out.

 

I’m going to spend some time talking around contacts and putting together some new scenarios, but I’m struggling to find much upside.

 

I suspect Merkel will have to go. The outlook is for a complete re-jig in German politics; out with the old, and in with something new(er). New coalition discussions or an election will be equally drawn out. A new administration could be vulnerable, weak and uncertain as the “leader of Europe” is entirely inward focused in coming months/years.

 

Don’t underestimate the sentiment effects on Europe. Who is going to lead the agenda re closer union, banking union and reform of the ESM, bailout and QE policies? And what about dealing with Putin, Italian elections next year, the inevitable Greece bailout blow up, renewed immigration crisis, Brexit, a blow-up with Trump, and a Frenchman to replace Draghi at the helm of the ECB looking increasingly nailed-on.

 

And I reckon the young emperor in Paris, Macron, is going to be disappointed – if he see this as his chance to re-establish French leadership at the core of Europe, he may be well disappointed. If Berlin doesn’t care.. who’s interested?

 

Perhaps not – Yoorp is a long-game.

via http://ift.tt/2mLdG6H Tyler Durden

A “New Era” In Chinese Regulation Means Turmoil For $15 Trillion In China’s “Shadows”

The post-Party Congress attempts to deleverage and crack down on the worst abuses in China’s horrific credit bubble – especially the country's $15 trillion in wealth-management products – saw China’s authorities turn their sights on shadow banking and wealth management products (WMPs) specifically. On their way out are "guaranteed returns" and “capital pools”, which had turned the wealth management sector into a Ponzi scheme. In a radical and "shocking" departure from the historic norm, financial institutions will have to offer yields based on the risks and returns of the underlying assets.

As Citic' Ming Ming summarized China's shadow reform to Bloomberg, this is "the most comprehensive and most profound regulatory document ever. This marks the beginning of a new era in financial regulation as it implies the end of a ‘big leap’ in the asset management industry. Going forward, it means more compliance requirements, tighter risk control, and thus slower but better-quality growth."

This might go down like a cup of cold sick with Chinese savers who have become accustomed to circumventing financial repression via these products. However – and this is significant – the new regime doesn’t take effect until the end of June 2019. We can only guess the delay reflects the enormity of the problems discovered by China’s regulators when they finally looked under the hood.

The shadow banking measures, announced after Friday’s close, hit Chinese equities when they opened Monday. However, the sharp fall in the Shanghai Composite miraculously turned around late in the day, closing up 0.3%. Either, “bargain hunters” saw a too-good-to-be-missed opportunity as Bloomberg TV implied, or the “National Team” was ordered off the bench late in the session. We think we know the answer and our sense is that the authorities are increasingly concerned about risk-taking in Chinese equity markets currently. On Friday we highlighted the warning from the state-owned Xinhua news agency that the share price of China’s largest liquor maker, Kweichow Moutai, was rising too fast.

This is Bloomberg's take on the market reaction to the new shadow banking rules.

China’s sweeping new plan to rein in its shadow banking industry rippled through the nation’s stock market on Monday, sending the Shanghai Composite Index to a two-month low. Investors pushed the benchmark gauge down as much as 1.4 percent amid concern that the government’s latest attempt to tighten supervision of $15 trillion in asset-management products will siphon funds from the market. Developers and brokerages paced losses. While analysts applauded the plan as an important step toward curbing risk in China’s financial system, they also warned of turbulence as markets adjust to outflows from popular shadow-banking products.

The government directives, which are set to take effect in 2019, add to signs that President Xi Jinping is willing to sacrifice growth as he tries to put the world’s second-largest economy on a more stable financial footing. “The rules dealt a blow to the market,” said Zhang Gang, a Shanghai-based strategist with Central China Securities Co. “A lot of such products had positions in the equity market, and those that don’t qualify under new rules may choose to exit some small and medium caps.”

In the midst of the sell-off, the major losers in the real estate sector were China Vanke Co. which fell 4.9% on the wild(er) Shenzhen exchange, Poly real Estate which fell 3.2% and Gemdale Corp. which fell 2.6%. Securities dealers tumbled to a five-month low with Citic Securities sliding 3.7% at one point. Meanwhile, trading in China’s government bond market was relatively civilized, with the benchmark 10-year yield rising 1 basis point to 3.97% – remaining on the “right” side of the psychologically important 4.0% level. That said, the benchmark has risen 24 basis point since the end of the Party congress on 24 October 2017. 

This was Reuters’ take on the new shadow banking measures.

The guidelines unified rules covering asset management products issued by banks, trust firms, insurance asset management companies, securities firms, funds and futures companies, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) said in a joint statement with the banking, insurance, securities and foreign exchange regulators…The new rules aim to close loopholes that allow regulatory arbitrage, reduce leverage levels to curb asset price bubbles and rein in shadow banking activity.

The new rules will set leverage limits for asset management products. They will cap the total assets to net assets ratio at 140 percent for open mutual funds and 200 percent for private funds. Investors will be prohibited from pledging their shares in asset management products as collateral to obtain financing, a practice that would increase leverage. The central bank also said financial institutions must break the practice of providing investors with implicit guarantees against investment losses.

Financial institutions will also be forbidden from creating a “capital pool” to manage funds raised through asset management products. The practice allows banks to roll over the products constantly. The investment losses will be implicitly covered by the new product issuance…Financial institutions will also be forbidden from creating a “capital pool” to manage funds raised through asset management products. The practice allows banks to roll over the products constantly. The investment losses will be implicitly covered by the new product issuance.

While the new shadow banking measures are obviously welcome, we fear that they are coming too late to prevent a catastrophic bursting of China’s debt bubble. As we said in “The Complete Idiot’s Guide To The Biggest Risks In China”.

we have said for the past 3 years, the next global crisis will start in China, and with Xi's role cemented for the next 5 years (if not for life) the smart thing would be to have the Chinese economic hiccup (because recession is clearly a taboo under central planning) as soon as possible, so the economy can recover by 2022.

As ever, it’s the timing of China’s “Minsky moment” which remains elusive. Having said that, we suspect that the Xinhua warning about Kweichow Moutai was a signal that the Chinese leadership is on high alert regarding a spike in equity volatility. As we said on Friday.

In retrospect, perhaps the Xinhua warning was not so strange: after China's debt-fueled stock market bubble burst in 2015, wiping out $5 trillion of value, Chinese policy makers have acted to restrain excessive speculation in equities. “Xinhua is concerned that a runaway rally in a heavyweight like Kweichow will hamper the stability of the overall market,” said Hao Hong, chief strategist at Bocom International Holding Co in Hong Kong.

And while one can wonder why China is suddenly so concerned about even the hint of potential vol spike in the stock market – suggesting that even a modest selloff could have dramatic consequences for the Chinese financial sector – it is certainly strange that whereas even China is acting to restrain the euphoria of its citizens over fears of what happens during the next bubble, in other "developed" countries, the local central bankers, politicians and TV pundits have no problem in forcing retail investors to go all risk assets when the market is at all-time highs.

As for China, it will have truly gone a full "180", if in a few months time instead of arresting sellers as it did in the summer of 2015, Beijing throw stock buyers in prison next.

Below Bloomberg summarises the key takeaways from the new rules followed by the reactions from several analysts and portfolio managers.

  • This adds to evidence that containing financial risks is a priority for President Xi Jinping after he cemented his grip on power at the Communist Party congress in October
  • The rules may bring an end to popular short-term investment products that offer fixed rates of return; returns from new products will fluctuate and more accurately reflect the risks of their underlying assets
  • Uniform guidelines for banks, trusts, insurers, fund managers and brokerages will help prevent regulatory arbitrage
  • The move to end implicit guarantees is welcome, but it could spur outflows and weigh on domestic securities markets
  • Smaller banks are more vulnerable to a loss of off-balance sheet funding than larger ones
  • A grace period through June 30, 2019, will help contain market fallout and give financial institutions time to prepare
  • Watch for follow-through; authorities have clamped down on shadow banking before, only to ease up because they feared an economic slowdown
  • David Loevinger at TCW Group

There’s no let-up post the party congress. They still have their foot on the brake and they will keep it there for a long time. Chinese leaders have realized that disorderly unwinding of financial leverage presents one of the biggest risks to the economy. The importance of this announcement is that the rule is being applied across financial sectors. Similar financial products are treated the same way, regardless of which financial institution offers it and who regulates it. That’s important because regulation arbitraging had been rampant. It looks like a signal that the new financial stability and development committee may mean business in terms of harmonizing financial regulations. You cannot just say there’s no longer guarantees. You have to show people that there’s no longer guarantees. The only way to show it is to force investors to take losses. They have to see it to believe it.

  • Patrick Chovanec at Silvercrest Asset Management

It’s a good move, and much overdue, but depends entirely on the follow-through. There have been plenty of less formal crackdowns before. They’ve broken down because Chinese authorities have been unwilling to face the consequences of truly cutting off questionable credit. The private wealth products are now thoroughly embedded in the heart of China’s financial system and play a key role in rolling over non-performing debt. Investors believe they will be paid regardless of whether the investment performs or not. If investors can lose their money, they will stop funding these sorts of assets. Is China willing to accept what that means?

  • Ming Ming at Citic Securities

It is the most comprehensive and most profound regulatory document ever. This marks the beginning of a new era in financial regulation as it implies the end of a ‘big leap’ in the asset management industry. Going forward, it means more compliance requirements, tighter risk control, and thus slower but better-quality growth.

  • Yang Ling at StarRock Investment Management

Banks, the industry’s big brother with 29 trillion yuan of WMPs, will bear the brunt of the new rules, which foreshadow the disappearance of products with less than three months maturity and those offering a promised rate of return. That means banks can no longer invest in long-term assets by rolling over short-term products to profit from the duration mismatch. To investors, banks’ WMPs will no longer be risk-free.

  • James Stent, author and former director at China Minsheng

What’s important to me is there’s a lot of time given for actual implementation. That is to ensure that as they begin to bring the wealth management products under control, they will not be too disruptive on the economy. They will give people plenty of time to react. I think it is very favorable news. It again shows foreigners all their worries that these are going to bring down the Chinese economy are nonsense. The Chinese have been well aware of the risks. They have been planning this probably for at least a year and a half. Now they are implementing it very slowly and this is good news. I think wealth management products will still be there, but they will change the pricing to reflect the risks.

  • Stephen Jen at Eurizon SLJ Capital

Chinese investors also need to be conditioned to understand that investments have risks, and that corporate bonds should carry higher spreads than what we are seeing now. The real test of whether these implicit government guarantees are indeed lifted will only come when an important corporate defaults. Only time will tell.

  • Becky Liu at Standard Chartered Bank

The rules close many loopholes that had resulted from previously segregated regulatory frameworks. They have turned out to be tighter than a version leaked earlier this year and are likely to lead to slower asset growth in the foreseeable future. They will materially curb asset managers’ ability to increase leverage, both market and structural, in the long-term. In the near term, the bond market’s current defensive tone will likely continue. In the medium term, due to limitations on non-standard products and leverage, demand for standardized products such as bonds and equities will increase, while that for non-standard products will decrease.

  • Jiang Chao at Haitong Securities

The new rules will reverse the asset management industry’s aggressive expansion, leading to a drop in entrusted investments — which are funds that were farmed out by banks to external money managers. Demand for bond allocation is likely to be curbed, and money will return to lower-risk assets from high-yielding, non-standard assets with poor liquidity.

  • Pan Jie at Orient Securities

Money-market fund yields are likely to replace that of WMPs to become new risk-free rates. The new rules are negative to lower grades and will lead to wider credit spreads. This is because it will now be difficult for new WMPs to invest in such securities.
 

via http://ift.tt/2AWFvv2 Tyler Durden

Frontrunning: November 20

  • Merkel faces worst political crisis of her career (FT)
  • Europe Faces a Hamstrung Germany as Merkel’s Coalition Bid Fails (BBG)
  • Merkel’s Failure Is Bad News for May (BBG)
  • What’s Left For Noble Group Creditors: The Answer’s in Jamaica (BBG)
  • Bitcoin’s White-Knuckle Ride Continues as It Dashes Past $8,000 (BBG)
  • UK Preparing Enhanced Brexit Cash Offer (BBG)
  • Soros attacks ‘hate-mongering’ of Orban’s Hungary  (FT)
  • Soros Says Smear Campaign Is Based on Spies and Lies (BBG)
  • Putin plan to rejuvenate Russian politics makes slow progress (Reuters)
  • China Clampdown Signals ‘New Era’ for $15 Trillion in Funds (BBG)
  • Trump open to dropping healthcare provision in Senate tax bill: aide (Reuters)
  • Americans Will Have Their Cheapest Thanksgiving Since 2013 (BBG)
  • Czech Tycoon Faces Test in Parliament as Lawmakers Pick Leaders (BBG)
  • Canada, Mexico to question U.S. auto content demands at NAFTA talks (Reuters)
  • Should America’s Upper Middle Class Take the Biggest Tax Hit? (BBG)
  • Limits on Trump’s Power to Shape Courts Fall Away (WSJ)
  • Marvell Technology to buy Cavium for $6 billion (Reuters)
  • Toshiba gains breathing room with $5.4 billion share issue to overseas investors (Reuters)
  • Alibaba Bets $2.9 Billion It Can Take on Wal-Mart in China (BBG)
  • Top of the Market? That Could Be a Good Thing (WSJ)
  • Two Experimental Roche Drugs Succeed in Key Patient Studies (BBG)
  • How China’s Acquisitive HNA Group Fell From Favor (WSJ)

Overnight Media Digest

WSJ

– Maria Contreras-Sweet, who led the Small Business Administration under President Barack Obama, has submitted an offer to acquire Weinstein Co. Contreras-Sweet said she hopes to be executive chairwoman of a majority-female board heading the company. on.wsj.com/2j7Rn61

– Marvell Technology Group is nearing a deal to buy chip maker Cavium Inc for about $6 billion. The deal would comprises 50 percent cash and 50 percent stock and values Cavium at $80 or more a share. on.wsj.com/2j9yxeH

– Senator Susan Collins recited a list of concerns she had with the Republican tax bill barreling through the Senate, raising pressure on the party’s leadership to slow its progress and make changes to secure passage. on.wsj.com/2j9tjQl

– The Trump administration is adding hurdles and increasing scrutiny in the employment-visa application process, making it harder for businesses to hire foreign workers, and companies and immigration attorneys are bracing for more changes soon. on.wsj.com/2j7sIyE

 

FT

MPs will present draft legislation on Monday intended to end exploitation and close employment loopholes in the underbelly of Britain’s labour market.

Greece’s central bank governor is under investigation by an anti-corruption prosecutor over the alleged leaking of an auditor’s report on Piraeus Bank SA, a troubled Greek lender accused of violating capital controls imposed at the height of the country’s financial crisis.

Co-working start-up WeWork is ramping up efforts to sell office space to global banks as the uncertainties of Brexit weigh on institutions’ property plans.

Eight of the world’s largest banks are set to discuss financial settlements with the European Commission, drawing a line under a four-year probe into allegations they formed a cartel to rig the global foreign exchange market.

 

NYT

– The soccer club A.C. Milan is bleeding money after a spending spree on star players and is seeking new investors or a refinancing of the high-interest loan that Chinese businessman Li Yonghong took to buy the club. That loan comes due in a year. nyti.ms/2B4IkuI

– Honda motor Co said it would recall about 800,000 Odyssey minivans in the United States because of problems with locking adjustable seats into place. nyti.ms/2hEVAOw

– According to a new study based on a continuing national health survey, 60.7 percent of children and 50 percent of adults drank a sugary beverage on any given day in 2014, down from 79.7 percent of children and 61.5 percent of adults in 2003. nyti.ms/2hNhd2G

– Justice League collected a disappointing $96 million at North American theaters over the weekend, or 42 percent less than its franchise predecessor, “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice,” had over its first three days in March 2016. It was enough to top the weekend box office, but analysts had expected “Justice League” to take in at least $110 million based on surveys that measure pre-release audience interest. nyti.ms/2zQRY6v

 

Canada

THE GLOBE AND MAIL

** Negotiators are making progress on less contentious portions of the North American free-trade agreement – such as slashing red tape for exporters and standardizing food-safety regulations between Mexico, Canada and U.S. – while punting the more difficult ones to future rounds of talks. tgam.ca/2jHijh5

** U.S. investment bank JPMorgan Chase & Co has emerged as the biggest buyer of second-hand cargo freighters this year, after it bought 12 ships for $250-million (U.S.) according to VesselsValue Ltd. tgam.ca/2jF6o3k

** Canadian leisure-travel provider Transat AT Inc’s Chief Executive Jean-Marc Eustache says he plans to step down and hand the chief executive job to current operations boss Annick Guérard. tgam.ca/2jHlZiJ

NATIONAL POST

** Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is expected to announce he is heading to Beijing early next month to launch free trade talks with China.bit.ly/2hMRLKS

 

Britain

The Times

Accrol, which makes toilet rolls for Lidl and other retailers, is poised to unveil plans to raise new funds in an effort to escape a cash crisis. bit.ly/2j7PnL4

The chancellor Philip Hammond is poised to throw a tax lifeline to oil and gas producers this week in an attempt to unleash an estimated 40 billion pounds of new North Sea investment. bit.ly/2j9FRaf

The Guardian

Philip Hammond has dismissed calls from the head of the NHS for an emergency cash injection of 4 billion pounds, as he said people running public services always predict “Armageddon” before a budget. bit.ly/2j8osyI

The editor-in-chief of the Mirror titles has indicated that their parent group will face deeper job losses across its 5,000-plus workforce if it fails to seal a 130 million pound deal to buy Richard Desmond’s Express and Star newspapers and celebrity magazine OK! bit.ly/2j7r9AB

The Telegraph

House building is the “number one priority” in the Budget and the “powers of the state” will be used to force construction numbers up to 300,000 per year, Chancellor Philip Hammond said. bit.ly/2j8fEZW

The Government looks to have given a rival bid to develop Heathrow’s third runway a lift after stating for the first time it welcomed competition in the construction of the nation’s airports. bit.ly/2j9GxMP

Sky News

A consortium of bondholders is on the brink of gaining control of BrightHouse, the UK’s biggest rent-to-own retailer, as part of a 220 million pound restructuring of the troubled company. bit.ly/2j8SAdB

The Independent

Aled Jones has reportedly been taken off BBC broadcasts following an allegation about “inappropriate contact” by a female colleague. ind.pn/2j95wQx

Britain is poised to increase its Brexit “divorce bill” offer to Brussels, Philip Hammond has signalled, ahead of a fresh Cabinet clash on the issue. ind.pn/2j7Nyhl

via http://ift.tt/2jaacpj Tyler Durden

Money and Markets Infographic Shows Silver Most Undervalued Asset

Money and Markets Infographic Shows Silver Most Undervalued Asset

– Silver remains severely under owned and under valued asset
– Entire silver market worth tiny $100 billion shown in one tiny square
– “All of the World’s Money and Markets in One Visualization”

– Must see ‘Money and Markets’ infographic shows relative size of key markets: silver bullion, gold bullion, cryptocurrencies/ bitcoin, largest companies, 50 richest people, Fed balance sheet, currency, stocks, property, cash, debt & derivatives
– Small allocation by investors and world’s richest will see silver surge like bitcoin

 

Click to enlarge. Source: Visual Capitalist

by Visual Capitalist

Millions, billions, and trillions…

When we talk about the giant size of Apple, the fortune of Warren Buffett, or the massive amount of global debt accumulated – all of these things sound large, but they are actually extremely different in magnitude.

That’s why visualizing things spatially can give us a better perspective on money and markets.

HOW MUCH MONEY EXISTS?

This infographic was initially created to show how much money exists in its different forms. For example, to highlight how much physical cash there is in comparison to broader measures of money which include saving and checking account deposits.

Interestingly, what is considered “money” depends on who you are asking.

Are the abstractions created by Central Banks really money? What about gold, bitcoins, or other hard assets?

A NEW MEANING

However, since we first released this infographic in 2015, “All the World’s Money and Markets” has taken on a different meaning to us and many others. It’s a way of simplifying a complex universe of currencies, assets, and other financial instruments in a way that people can understand.

Numbers represented in the data visualization range from the size of the above-ground silver market ($17 billion) to the notional value of all derivatives ($1.2 quadrillion as a high-end estimate). In between those two extremes, we’ve added many other familiar measures, such as the GDP of California, the value of equities, the real estate market, along with different money supply metrics to give perspective.

The end result? A visually pleasing, but enlightening new way to understand the vast universe of global assets.

All of the World’s Money and Markets in One Visualization via Visual Capitalist


Related Content

Silver Very Undervalued from Historical Perpective of Ancient Greece

Silver Production Has “Huge Decline” In 2nd Largest Producer Peru

Silver Bullion Prices Set to Soar

 

News and Commentary

Gold holds near one-month peak despite firmer dollar (Reuters.com)

Euro Drops as German Talks Fail; Asian Stocks Slip (Bloomberg.com)

Fed readiness to raise rates next month and a wariness about next recession (MarketWatch.com)

Bitcoin Soars Past $8,000 as Technology Shift Concern Vanishes (Bloomberg.com)

Gold smugglers now prefer Europe over Gulf countries: Customs (IndiaTimes.com)


Source: Bloomberg

Prepare to bet against bitcoin as it becomes civilised – Tett (FT.com)

Gold Price Suppression – Zero Hedge invites Financial Times to heed GATA (ZeroHedge.com)

Gold Versus Bitcoin: The Pro-Gold Argument Takes Shape (GoldSeek.com)

Upsurge in big earthquakes predicted for 2018 as Earth rotation slows (ZeroHedge.com)

Arab League Holds Emergency Session: Iran And “Terrorist” Hezbollah Must Be Stopped (ZeroHedge.com)

Gold Prices (LBMA AM)

20 Nov: USD 1,292.35, GBP 974.82 & EUR 1,096.43 per ounce
17 Nov: USD 1,283.85, GBP 969.31 & EUR 1,088.19 per ounce
16 Nov: USD 1,277.70, GBP 969.01 & EUR 1,085.53 per ounce
15 Nov: USD 1,285.70, GBP 976.62 & EUR 1,086.29 per ounce
14 Nov: USD 1,273.70, GBP 972.47 & EUR 1,086.59 per ounce
13 Nov: USD 1,278.40, GBP 977.59 & EUR 1,097.89 per ounce
10 Nov: USD 1,284.45, GBP 976.44 & EUR 1,102.19 per ounce

Silver Prices (LBMA)

20 Nov: USD 17.15, GBP 12.94 & EUR 14.56 per ounce
17 Nov: USD 17.09, GBP 12.95 & EUR 14.49 per ounce
16 Nov: USD 17.04, GBP 12.92 & EUR 14.48 per ounce
15 Nov: USD 17.12, GBP 13.00 & EUR 14.45 per ounce
14 Nov: USD 16.94, GBP 12.92 & EUR 14.45 per ounce
13 Nov: USD 16.93, GBP 12.93 & EUR 14.53 per ounce
10 Nov: USD 17.00, GBP 12.92 & EUR 14.60 per ounce


Recent Market Updates

– Is New Fed Chief A “Swamp Critter Extraordinaire”?
– Deepening Crisis In Hyper-inflationary Venezuela and Zimbabwe
– UK Debt Crisis Is Here – Consumer Spending, Employment and Sterling Fall While Inflation Takes Off
– Protect Your Savings With Gold: ECB Propose End To Deposit Protection
– Internet Shutdowns Show Physical Gold Is Ultimate Protection
– Gold Coins and Bars Saw Demand Rise 17% to 222T in Q3
– Prepare For Interest Rate Rises And Global Debt Bubble Collapse
– Platinum Bullion ‘May Be One Of The Only Cheap Assets Out There’
– World’s Largest Gold Producer China Sees Production Fall 10%
– German Investors Now World’s Largest Gold Buyers
– Gold Price Reacts as Central Banks Start Major Change
– Why Switzerland Could Save the World and Protect Your Gold
– Invest In Gold To Defend Against Bail-ins

Important Guides

For your perusal, below are our most popular guides in 2017:

Essential Guide To Storing Gold In Switzerland

Essential Guide To Storing Gold In Singapore

Essential Guide to Tax Free Gold Sovereigns (UK)

Please share our research with family, friends and colleagues who you think would benefit from being informed by it.

via http://ift.tt/2zXb7S5 GoldCore