Bitcoin Crashes After China Bans New Deposits; PBOC Gets DDOSed In Retaliation

Yesterday it was the Us Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network that tightened its grip on businesses that accept Bitcoin. Today, it is China, where the world’s largest Bitcoin exchange by trading volume, BTCChina announced that he had received word from “above” that his platform would no longer be able to accept renminbi from BTC buyers. “As of right now, we have received notice from our third-party payment company that they will disallow customers from making deposits into our exchange,” Bobby Lee, a former Yahoo developer who co-founded BTCChina this year, told the Financial Times.  The result, not surprisingly, is an overnight crash in BTC, which crashed by 50% from $900 two days ago to just $455 hours ago.

More from the FT:

With its booming market for commerce, China had been seen by Bitcoin enthusiasts as fertile ground for the virtual currency. However, regulators were concerned that people could use Bitcoins to skirt the country’s capital controls. They also grew alarmed at the rampant speculative demand for Bitcoins, warning it had the makings of a bubble.

 

The Chinese central bank took a hard line two weeks ago, banning the country’s financial institutions from handling Bitcoin transactions.

 

Although the People’s Bank of China said individuals were still free to trade it at their own risk, the ban on third-party payment service providers from doing Bitcoin business effectively makes new purchases of the virtual currency impossible.

 

“I’m not that surprised,” said Hong Hao, chief China strategist at Bank of Communications. “Even if the amount of Bitcoin in circulation wasn’t that large yet, it was a potential threat to the monetary system.”

 

Mr Lee of BTCChina said the emphasis of the notice was on deposits, meaning that customers with existing renminbi balances would still be able to withdraw their cash from the exchange. “They are completely safe,” he said, adding that people with money already deposited on the exchange still had the option of buying Bitcoins.

 

 

China’s capital controls mean it takes time for investors to arbitrage the difference between prices in and outside the country.

In a world where the central banks are actively engaged in gold capital controls (and have been for over 40 years), and the BIS has its own in-house gold prices suppression team, nobody could have possibly seen this coming.

We are, of course, joking. But some who apparently were angry and did not see this coming, were the computer hackers of the world. As @george_chen reports, the PBOC reported it was promptly DDOSed in retaliation for China’s overnight crackdown on Bitcoin.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/rIGD9qmMfLw/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Santa Yellen Or Scrooge McBen

Of the 8 “most important ever” FOMC decisions in 2013, this one is undisputedly, and without doubt, the 8th. As Jim Reid summarizes, what everyone wonders is whether today’s decision by the FOMC will have a bearing on a few last-minute Xmas presents around global financial markets. No taper and markets probably breathe a sigh of relief and the feel-good factor might turn that handheld game machine into a full-blown PS4 by Xmas day. However a taper now might just take the edge off the festivities and leave a few presents on the shelves. Given that the S&P 500 has pretty much flat-lined since early-mid November in spite of better data one would have to say that some risk of tapering has been priced in but perhaps not all of it. Alternatively if they don’t taper one would expect markets to see a pretty decent relief rally over the rest of the year. So will it be Santa or Scrooge from the Fed tonight at 2pm EST?

Heading into today’s FOMC, Asian equities have recovered from a soft opening to trade with a fairly upbeat tone. S&P 500 futures are trading 0.2% higher as we type, and the Nikkei is outperforming (+2.0%) helped by a higher USDJPY. Japanese export data for November was better than expected (+18.4% YoY vs +18.0% expected) which is helping sentiment there, even if imports soared too, leading to the biggest Japanese trade deficit ever. China’s seven-day repo rate is up 124bp today to 6.4%, in its biggest jump in six months which also takes the rate to its highest level since June 2013. The rate spike has been attributed to a number of factors including the approaching end of year, recent acceleration of rate liberalization reforms and the PBoC who did not add liquidity to the banking system earlier this week. Elsewhere the Reserve Bank of India held rates constant at its policy meeting, against expectations of a third successive rate hike to fight inflation.

The latest German IFO number yielded little surprises with the headline coming in as expected but bund futures saw a brief move higher after the German debt agency announced that the federal government plans to issue just EUR 205bln in debt, ex-linkers, compared to EUR 247bln this year. Also of note the 3-month Euribor Interest rate fixed at 0.298% vs. Prev. 0.298% after seeing consecutive rises in recent sessions. Today, as was the case yesterday, the Euribor strip has been bull flattening, as the rising trend noted since the beginning of December has dissipated, with yesterday seeing the first rise in Eurozone excess liquidity for some weeks.

Turning to the day ahead, the German IFO survey, UK employment data and the BoE’s minutes will be the main focus in Europe. November Housing starts will be released at the start of the US session before the FOMC’s policy announcement at 2pm EST. Bernanke’s final scheduled press conference follows half an hour later.

Finally, there is no POMO today, but there is a double POMO tomorrow.

 

Overnight news bulletin summary from RanSquawk and Bloomberg

  • All eyes and ears await Bernanke’s penultimate FOMC meeting due later and whether or not the Fed will opt to commence the beginning of tapering or wait until Q1 2014. For a full Fed preview please click here.
  • The latest German IFO release provided markets with very little as it came in alongside expectations.
  • GBP is the outpeformer for this morning’s session following the UK ILO data which came in at 7.4% against expectations of 7.6% and resulted in an aggressive steepening of the UK curve.
  • Looking ahead for the session there is the release of the US Housing Starts, Building Permits, weekly DoE inventories, US 5y note auction and the widely anticipated Fed rate decision.
  • Treasuries steady as market waits FOMC decision on interest rates and possible tapering at 2pm in Washington; Bernanke’s last press conference as Fed chief scheduled for 2:30pm.
  • 10Y yields near levels seen at Sept. meeting, when Fed chose not to scale back asset purchases; expectations for such a move today are split
  • The Fed has decided to delay imposing limits on leverage at eight of the biggest U.S. financial institutions until a global agreement is completed, according to two people briefed on the discussions
  • Bank of Japan officials see significant scope to boost JGB purchases if needed to achieve their inflation target, according to people familiar with the discussions
  • U.K. unemployment fell to 7.4% in the three months through October, lowest level since April 2009 and moving toward 7.0% threshold at which BOE said it will consider raising rates
  • Policy makers said further appreciation of pound could hamper Britain’s economic recovery, according to minutes of BOE’s Dec. meeting
  • Germany’s Ifo institute’s business climate index rose top 109.5 in Dec., strongest in 20 months, from 109.3 in Nov.
  • Australia’s central bank Governor Glenn Stevens said the board has maintained an “open mind” on whether it needs to cut interest rates further as it sees signs low  borrowing costs are supporting spending
  • Ukrainian anti-government protesters demanded to know what President Viktor Yanukovych had ceded to seal $15b of Russian financial aid and a one-third discount on energy imports.
  • Sovereign yields mixed. EU peripheral spreads widen. Nikkei gains 2% while Shanghai Composite little changed. European stocks and U.S. equity index futures rise. WTI crude and gold little changed, copper falls

US Calendar Event Calendar

  • MBA mortgage applications, cons n/a (7:00)
  • Housing starts, cons 954k (8:30)
  • FOMC rate decision, cons 0.25%; pace of bond purchases, unch at $85bn (14:00) followed by press conference (14:30)
  • Sale of US$35bn 5y notes (11:30)

Market Re-Cap

All eyes and ears await Bernanke’s penultimate FOMC meeting due later and whether or not the Fed will opt to commence the beginning of tapering or wait until Q1 2014. This has led to somewhat cautious trade once again in Europe with volumes reflecting the fact that few are willing to take a position into the final main event of 2013. None the less a 2.0% gain overnight in the Nikkei 225, supported by news that the BoJ is said to see significant room for ramping up its bond purchases has resulted in higher stocks in both UK and Europe with technology names leading the advance.

The latest German IFO number yielded little surprises with the headline coming in as expected but bund futures saw a brief move higher after the German debt agency announced that the federal government plans to issue just EUR 205bln in debt, ex-linkers, compared to EUR 247bln this year. Also of note the 3-month Euribor Interest rate fixed at 0.298% vs. Prev. 0.298% after seeing consecutive rises in recent sessions. Today, as was the case yesterday, the Euribor strip has been bull flattening, as the rising trend noted since the beginning of December has dissipated, with yesterday seeing the first rise in Eurozone excess liquidity for some weeks.

Meanwhile, the UK curve has steepened aggressively after the UK ILO unemployment rate for December came in at 7.4%, below expectations, and moving ever closer to the BoE’s threshold for an adjustment to monetary policy, this in turn has led to GBP out performing its counterparts in the forex market. The actual BoE minutes were broadly in-line showing once again that the MPC voted unanimously for rates and the APF to remain unchanged.

Asian Headlines

Chinese FDI (Nov) Y/Y 2.4% vs. Exp. 1.1% (Prev. 1.2%); Jan-Nov FDI rose 5.48% Y/Y.

China’s Mofcom said retail sales are to grow by around 13% this year from a year ago and that it sees exports maintaining relatively steady growth in December, but added that they can’t be overly optimistic about Dec. exports. (Newswires)

Japanese Trade Balance (JPY)(Nov) M/M -1292.9bln vs.
Exp. -1351.1bln (Prev. -1090.7bln, Rev. -1092.7bln)
– The largest deficit on record for the month of November.

RBI Repurchase Rate (Dec 18) 7.75% vs. Exp. 8.00% (Prev. 7.75%)
– RBI Reverse Repo Rate (Dec 18) 6.75% vs. Exp. 7.00% (Prev. 6.75%)
– RBI Cash Reserve Ratio (Dec 18) 4.00% vs. Exp. 4.00% (Prev. 4.00%)

EU & UK Headlines

German IFO Business Climate (Dec) M/M 109.5 vs Exp. 109.5 (Prev. 109.3)
– IFO Current Assessment (Dec) M/M 111.6 vs Exp. 112.5 (Prev. 112.2)
– IFO Expectations (Dec) M/M 107.4 vs Exp. 106.5 (Prev. 106.3)

IFO economist Wohlrabe says expects German Q4 growth of 0.3% and growth could accelerate to 0.5% in Q1 2014.

UK ILO Unemployment Rate 3-Months (Oct) 7.4% vs. Exp. 7.6% (Prev. 7.6%) – lowest since Feb. 2009

UK Claimant Count Rate (Nov) M/M 3.8% vs Exp. 3.8% (Prev. 3.9%)
UK Jobless Claims Change (Nov) M/M -36.7K vs Exp. -35.0K (Prev. -41.7K, Rev. -42.8K)
– Average Weekly Earnings (Oct) 3M/Y 0.9% vs Exp. 0.8% (Prev. 0.7%, Rev. 0.8%).
– Weekly Earnings ex Bonus (Oct) 3M/Y 0.8% vs Exp. 0.9% (Prev. 0.8%)

UK Employment Change (Oct) 3M/3M 250K vs Exp. 165K (Prev. 177K)

The BoE December minutes showed the MPC voted 9-0 to leave rates and bond purchases unchanged, alongside expectations.

The Italian economy chief at the centre left coalition PD, Taddei says working on plan for EUR 16bln of spending cuts.

German Chancellor Merkel said Germany won’t agree to shared debt and Euro Bonds. Merkel said solid Eurozone finances remain priority and cannot spur Eurozone growth with stimulus alone.

US Headlines

Fed Watcher Hilsenrath said a 60% chance of a taper as forecast by PIMCO is in the right ballpark. Hilsenrath added the Fed is likely to do something today and that he sees tapering more likely today than it was ahead of the Sept meeting, commenting that the economy is in a better place than in September.

Goldman Sachs is now reining in riskier activities, shrinking its balance sheet and steering clear of trades that don’t produce the double-digit-percentage returns its shareholders crave, according to sources. The reason for this is because new rules and lacklustre markets have curbed profit, making it too expensive for the Co. to operate as it had during the boom years.

Moody’s said the outlook for US government’s Aaa rating remains stable and that the conclusion of the Senate debate reinforces US government creditworthiness.
Republican Senator Rand Paul threatens to delay Janet Yellen vote.

Equities

European equities are seen up across the board amid thin volumes following on from positive sentiment in the Asian session which saw the Nikkei 225 trade with gains of 2.02% after news that the BoJ is likely to expand its low-interest lending facility for industries by about JPY 1trl. The DAX is the outperforming index this morning following gains seen across German blue-chip companies. In terms of out equity specific news from the session so far, Endesa are the outperformer in the Stoxx 600 after being raised to buy vs hold at Kepler, whilst Technip are down over 8% following a broker move for CGG and a TEC FP pre-market update.

FX

GBP is the outpeformer for this morning’s session following the UK ILO data which came in at 7.4% against expectations of 7.6% and therefore, approaching the threshold set by the BoE for an adjustment to monetary policy. Elsewhere, as was the case yesterday there is said to be a very large option expiry in USD/JPY at 103.00 ahead of the NY cut with a size of USD 3bln.

RBA governor Stevens said AUD is still uncomfortably high and that AUD/USD above 0.9000 is not sustainable for the economy.

Commodities

WTI and Brent crude futures are trading flat after the recent modest gains were pared as the overnight US API data was seen lower than expected. However, natural gas is seen marginally higher as colder weather is expected in the US Midwest next week.

Iraq’s October crude exports rose 8.8% to 2.25mln b/d, according to Joint Organisations Data Initiative. They added that Nigeria’s October crude exports fell 8.6% to 2.05mln b/d and Kuwait Oct crude shipments fell 6.4% to 1.95mln bpd.

An oil refinery in Eastern Libya restarted production on Tuesday and oil exports from its related terminal is now set to follow suit according to a top oil official.

Saudi Arabia pumped 9.75mln bpd of crude oil in October and exported 7.71mln bpd of Crude in October, according to JODI.

The strikes at the three main refineries in France have now entered day six, with a majority of their producing units now closed, according to a CGT union official.

* * *

DB’s Jim Reid recaps the rest of overnight events

One wonders whether today’s decision by the FOMC will have a bearing on a few last-minute Xmas presents around global financial markets. No taper and markets probably breathe a sigh of relief and the feel-good factor might turn that handheld game machine into a full-blown PS4 by Xmas day. However a taper now might just take the edge off the festivities and leave a few presents on the shelves. Given that the S&P 500 has pretty much flat-lined since early-mid November in spite of better data one would have to say that some risk of tapering has been priced in but perhaps not all of it. Alternatively if they don’t taper one would expect markets to see a pretty decent relief rally over the rest of the year. So will it be Santa or Scrooge from the Fed tonight at 2pm EST?

For the record, the view from DB’s chief US economist Peter Hooper is that today’s FOMC will be a very close call, but he is leaning towards a taper-light of $5-15 bn, skewed towards Treasuries. He also thinks that the taper, if it does come, will be accompanied by a dovish statement that reinforces the low for longer message on policy rates. These “soft” statements will most likely come through either a re-emphasis of existing forward guidance; by noting that market expectations on the Fed funds rate do not look unreasonable; or by pointing out that their actions could be reversed if markets react negatively enough to put the economic expansion at risk. Meanwhile DB’s US economist Joe Lavorgna is looking for a $10 billion Treasuries-only taper. This is a view that he has held since the much stronger than expected October employment data (which came in at +200k versus consensus of +120k), which was subsequently matched by a similarly strong November employment report (+203k vs consensus of +185k). Joe makes the point that there should be much less concern on behalf of monetary policy makers about a taper given that the budget sequester was loosened, and 10yr treasury yields are at the same level as just before the September FOMC. Joe also thinks that the Fed will move to soften the taper effect by strengthening forward guidance. He thinks that the easiest and most efficient way to do that is to lower the unemployment rate threshold to 6.0% (or possibly even 5.5%).

While our economists are tipping a December taper, the view from the rest of the street is more mixed. Indeed, a Reuters poll conducted last week had 32 economists predicting a taper in March, 22 respondents said January and only 12 expected it this week. A December 6th survey by Bloomberg showed only one-third of economists said the Fed will begin reducing monthly bond purchases today. These numbers might have edged slightly higher over the past week though.

So aside from the tapering vs no taper cliffhanger, the other potential variable today is the multitude of ways in which the Fed could augment its forward guidance (if at all). Apart from the aforementioned “soft” statements and changes to the unemployment thresholds, there has been lots of market talk of reducing interest on excess reserves, the addition of an inflation floor and lowering fed funds rate projection
s for the coming years. Related to this point, today will also see the Fed update its economic projections. The key points of interest will be if and how the Fed changes their unemployment and inflation forecasts which may have an impact on how the market views the strength of the Fed’s forward guidance and the timing of rate hikes. Last but not least, this will be Ben Bernanke’s last scheduled press conference after eight years at the helm of the Fed. He may use this as an opportunity to reflect on his tenure as Fed Chairman. Whether his final press conference increases the odds in favour of a major policy announcement is debatable, but it certainly adds another element to an already fascinating FOMC. As we head into the final days of Bernanke’s tenure, the media are already reflecting on Bernanke’s tenure, including the WSJ’s Hilsenrath who wrote overnight that the Fed Chair successfully avoided a meltdown in 2008-2009 but failed to engineer a robust recovery.

Yesterday’s US November CPI number appeared to do little to settle the tapering debate. The headline number was exactly flat (0.0% MoM) and less than the market consensus of +0.1%. But many noted that this outcome was driven by softness in energy prices and absent this effect, core inflation was stronger than expected at 0.2% MoM (vs 0.1% expected and 0.1% previous). We should note that this number only just rounded up from 0.1% to 0.2%. The market reaction to the CPI print saw strengthening initially across equities, treasuries and major currencies against the USD (including EURUSD and GBPUSD). However this was quickly pared and the S&P 500 ended the day at -0.31%, erasing half of Monday’s gains in the process. In Europe, the Stoxx 600 had a fairly weak session (-0.74%) despite the strongest German ZEW reading since 2006. Perhaps the weakness in equities was driven by the higher than expected US core inflation print, but the intra-day low in equities came shortly after the better than expected NAHB homebuilder confidence print which picked up in December after a two-month lull (58 vs 54 previous and 55 expected). The NAHB said that the uptick was due in part to the release of pent-up demand caused by the uncertainty generated by the October government shutdown. There was little sign of FOMC nervousness in treasury markets with 10yr UST yields closing 4bp lower at 2.835% supported by a relatively solid 2yr auction.

Heading into today’s FOMC, Asian equities have recovered from a soft opening to trade with a fairly upbeat tone. S&P 500 futures are trading 0.2% higher as we type, and the Nikkei is outperforming (+1.5%) helped by a higher USDJPY (+0.25%). Japanese export data for November was better than expected (+18.4% YoY vs +18.0% expected) which is helping sentiment there. China’s seven-day repo rate is up 124bp today to 6.4%, in its biggest jump in six months which also takes the rate to its highest level since June 2013. The rate spike has been attributed to a number of factors including the approaching end of year, recent acceleration of rate liberalization reforms and the PBoC who did not add liquidity to the banking system earlier this week. Elsewhere the Reserve Bank of India held rates constant at its policy meeting, against expectations of a third successive rate hike to fight inflation.

In other headlines, the Financial Stability Oversight Council’s Office of Finance Research released its prototype financial stability monitor yesterday, which is designed to provide a heatmap tracking threats to market stability. The heatmap suggests that threats to financial stability have generally abated in 2013 compared to 2012. Interestingly but unsurprisingly, the key underlying indicator that has increased in risk over the past 12 months is “interest rate risk” – here the OFR says that duration risk is at recent historical highs, portfolio allocation to fixed income remains above historical trend and “there may be mispriced credit risk amid weakening standards for loan underwriting, as reflected in looser covenants and bank lending conditions”. This is the kind of thing that makes us think that removing bond buying will ultimately be much more difficult than central banks think.

Turning to the day ahead, the German IFO survey, UK employment data and the BoE’s minutes will be the main focus in Europe. November Housing starts will be released at the start of the US session before the FOMC’s policy announcement at 2pm EST. Bernanke’s final scheduled press conference follows half an hour later.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/ZVxhYWrNL1w/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Housing Market Setting Up for Another Crash

By EconMatters  

 

 

All that Glitters, is not Gold

 

 

 

The housing market appears to be in better shape than it really is and investors should be wary regarding investing in Housing stocks, investing in property not as a primary residence, and should conduct a thorough analysis of their own financial obligations with regards to their primary residence.

 

In many parts of the world real estate prices have risen quite substantially due to several factors, one is foreign buyers trying to move money out of their home countries for security purposes. Another is institutional investors hoping to buy low and sell high in an investment strategy, and then there are the small to medium size professional flippers who buy properties, make some cosmetic changes, and hope to sell these properties into an improving market because supply is artificially tighter, and the broader economy is better than when they originally purchased the properties. 

 

Macro Headwinds

 

However, there are a couple of macro dynamics that are going to provide significant headwinds for the housing market. One is taxes, and all the financial obligations that are rolled up into property taxes. As governments continue to spend more and more, local as well as state, jurisdictional, and federal the fundamental result is that property taxes continue to rise on real estate.

 

The property taxes are the real killers in real estate because a homeowner can even diligently pay off their mortgage and owe nothing on their home (which is becoming rarer these days), but still even in these best of circumstances the future property tax obligations are going to catch up to the homeowners as their income shrinks once they retire. 

 

Subsequently these individuals incomes shrink drastically, but the property taxes continue to escalate as these local and state jurisdictions need to get more money to support poor fiscal spending policies, and eventually homeowners have to sell their homes because they cannot afford a decade`s worth of property taxes. 

 

Fortunes Acquired Elsewhere Often Get Lost in Real Estate Market Crashes

 

The more expensive the real estate the higher the taxes which when the tide goes out in the economy, and people become overextended, then they have to start dumping real estate, and inevitably there is a huge margin call that runs through all financial assets, and hits real estate especially hard. 

 

Many multi-millionaires have lost most of their net worth mainly due to an overextension on real estate when times are good to find that the haircut on these properties when they need to sell via a fire sale just cripples them financially. 

 

The dynamic is as follows: They need to sell, but there are many people in this boat, the few buyers out there get spooked, prices fall sharply, but they still need to sell, so these sellers are forced to take 50 to 60% losses on these properties. There goes all the stored wealth like a vanishing mirage that the investors were trying to protect by investing in hard assets – it is really a vicious, pernicious cycle that repeats itself over and over in the real estate market.

 

Foreigners Not Exempt

 

This applies to foreign buyers as well, when they need the money during a reset in other financial areas, they are not going to be able to afford the property taxes on these properties, and local jurisdictions constantly needing more money, and effectively raising these property taxes every year, only makes the problem worse, and sets up the future drivers for the inevitable crash in real estate. Ironically, this results in the local jurisdictions not collecting any taxes at all on the properties for substantial time periods. 

 

Therefore, many foreigners who think that real estate in first world countries are safe and secure wealth storage vehicles when they buy at the top of the market with these offshoring strategies can lose 60% and more of their net worth in a market crash. 

 

This is one of the downfalls of all cash transactions when buying real estate at elevated market levels. Investors can walk away from mortgages like they did in 2007, but with 20 and 30% down payments to secure loans these days from banks; it is still a substantial loss for investors on any market re-set.

 

Foreigners all hiding money away in these properties are in for a rude surprise when they calculate their future tax obligations over just a ten year period. These people may or may not be able to afford the real estate on a long-term basis, but most of these people will definitely not be able to afford the property taxes on these purchases on a long-term basis without a consistent, perpetual revenue stream.

 

Likewise, since many of these financial resources were acquired in less than legitimate ways, these revenue streams are not consistently perpetual in nature which is required to meet perpetually consistent tax obligations at elevated levels on expensive real estate. 

 

Affordability Issues

 

 

The other problem is that property prices in several parts of the country are too high relative to incomes, think in terms of the two coasts, but there are many other areas as well. This means consumers are paying too high a percentage of their disposable income on housing. 

 

This always means that the market will eventually have to reset, or be forced to reset because any small change in the local labor market causes disproportionate reverberations in the real estate values, and substantially increases the likelihood of add-on contagion which severally makes these markets susceptible to large price drops in value for these expensive real estate markets. In short, you get a market crash in real estate values like we had in 2007. 

 

 

 Demographic Shifts 

 

The final worry is that with the large population of baby boomers now retiring, many of these individuals will soon realize that they don’t have the nest egg they thought they had once their incomes are reduced because they are no longer working full time.  

 

 

 Once they start factoring in property taxes for 15 years on higher appraised values for their homes, and they always go up for tax purposes, and the fact that comps are artificially high because home owners have to make major investments in their homes to market these properties, thereby raising taxable obligations on all homeowners in the process eve
n though most homes haven`t been upgraded. Many of these baby boomers are going to be forced to sell their homes, and turn to the rental market so that they can live off the home equity that they have built up over the years. 

 

This dynamic and macro driver would be very bearish for the real estate market, more supply means market saturation, and this leads to lower prices, which just reinforces the deflationary cycle causing other deflationary outcomes in the overall local economy. The baby boomer demographics are not favorable for the housing market, and this is a negative for the industry as a whole.

 

Final Thoughts

 

There are opportunities in the real estate market, but unfortunately most people don`t understand the importance of having cash on the sidelines waiting for these inevitable market crashes to buy at fire sale prices. Most investors get tied up in investments trying to get a return that they get stuck, and when the market crashes and properties are 70% off of their highs; this is the time to buy real estate. 

 

However, the trick is have the cash available, and not tied up in other illiquid investments. And investments can be illiquid for a myriad of reasons, such as usually liquid investments being heavily underwater due to the same market forces that are causing the housing market to crash. 

 

Cash truly on the sidelines is an undervalued investment principle, and one of the hardest long-term investment strategies to learn. Investors are always thinking about returns on an annual basis instead of sitting on cash and being in the position to buy when there are no buyers in markets.

 

Investors need to factor in the value of market timing in an investment strategy that focuses on long-term returns over a 10-year time period. Investors are so worried about 5% returns on their portfolios and beating inflation that they miss the 70% returns in 16 months type investments because they had no cash on the sidelines available for these market crash opportunities.

 

© EconMatters All Rights Reserved | Facebook | Twitter | Post Alert | Kindle


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/Llizxa-EQQg/story01.htm EconMatters

We're Building Stasi 2.0

 

I wrote this in early November. A US District Court decision yesterday (Dec 16, 2013) found that parts of the NSA’s mass data gathering are unconstitutional. It’s a small victory but a step in the right direction. In light of this decision, this article takes on renewed importance.

 

Before the Edward Snowden story broke, I watched a movie about East Germany. It was set in the time when East Germany was a communist dictatorship walled off from the world, like a huge maximum-security prison. The Lives of Others is a gripping drama that shows what that life was like. To say it was dehumanizing, that there was no justice, that people lived in constant terror of the secret police—the Stasi—does not even begin to describe it. For example, the Stasi had forensic information on every typewriter in the country. They could find the author of anything they didn’t like, and disappear him.

See the movie. By the way, the lead actor was hated in East Germany after the movie came out. Even years after communism collapsed, many of its victims are so scarred that they would prefer to blank it out. This is testimony to how horrific it was.

I normally write about gold and economics, but Edward Snowden has brought to the attention of America—and the whole world—a different issue. We advocates of the gold standard are, at root, fighting for freedom. So we should pay attention to this front in the same battle. There are many similarities with the fight for a free market in money, the unadulterated gold standard.

One of them is that the old notions of “liberal” and “conservative” seem almost inapplicable. It used to be that “conservatives” in the U.S. were in favor of more freedom and less government, at least nominally. But today, that’s not necessarily so. Wall Street is generally “conservative” and they are for a central bank, and its endless acts of Quantitative Easing.

Similarly, Republicans and “conservatives” are now coming out in favor of the National Security Agency, and defending its spying on American citizens. They do this in the wake of pervasive abuses that Snowden has disclosed. The Stasi could never have dreamed of some of the capabilities used against every American every day by the NSA, such as mass scanning of emails and phone calls, much less automatically building a list of contacts for each citizen or tracking everyone’s whereabouts in realtime.

Support for the NSA fits with conservatives’ strong support for “homeland security”. This term has been completely perverted, in a way that would make George Orwell proud. It is now about subjecting citizen-serfs to every conceivable inconvenience and intrusion, especially when they dare to travel by airplane, talk on the phone, send an email, get health care, or pay taxes. Instead of protecting the rights of the people, security agencies now exist to attack them.

Those who would defend the security establishment and the nascent police state may be “conservative” but they are no friends of man’s rights or of freedom. Some are blind ideologues, others are ignorant dupes, and many are just profiteering government contractors. It doesn’t matter; they are defending the indefensible.

It is shocking that people who grew up in a free country would staunchly support “fundamentally transforming” America into tyranny. And that’s what it’s about, tyranny and ultimately murder. There is no other reason to build a surveillance machine capable of watching everyone constantly, a healthcare system in which government bureaucrats make every life or death decision, a tax agency that knows what you think and who you voted for—and a militarized police force.

It’s a good thing that information disclosed by Edward Snowden has roiled the American electorate. He just may have gotten through to people with a wake-up call. I hope it is in time to change course.

The fight against surveillance, censorship, and pseudo-security has another similarity with the fight against fiat currency. If we lose the battle, it’s lights out. Our civilization will collapse into a new Dark Age.

The fight for honest money is linked to the fight against the police state. A police state will destroy the productivity that still props up the debt that backs the dollar. Alternatively, a dollar collapse will drive desperate, hungry people into the streets. This would provide cover for a crackdown and dictatorship.

Liberty had better achieve victory on both fronts!

 

 

Keith Weiner is the president of the Gold Standard Institute USA


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/5UBMYAOmy3c/story01.htm Gold Standard Institute

We’re Building Stasi 2.0

 

I wrote this in early November. A US District Court decision yesterday (Dec 16, 2013) found that parts of the NSA’s mass data gathering are unconstitutional. It’s a small victory but a step in the right direction. In light of this decision, this article takes on renewed importance.

 

Before the Edward Snowden story broke, I watched a movie about East Germany. It was set in the time when East Germany was a communist dictatorship walled off from the world, like a huge maximum-security prison. The Lives of Others is a gripping drama that shows what that life was like. To say it was dehumanizing, that there was no justice, that people lived in constant terror of the secret police—the Stasi—does not even begin to describe it. For example, the Stasi had forensic information on every typewriter in the country. They could find the author of anything they didn’t like, and disappear him.

See the movie. By the way, the lead actor was hated in East Germany after the movie came out. Even years after communism collapsed, many of its victims are so scarred that they would prefer to blank it out. This is testimony to how horrific it was.

I normally write about gold and economics, but Edward Snowden has brought to the attention of America—and the whole world—a different issue. We advocates of the gold standard are, at root, fighting for freedom. So we should pay attention to this front in the same battle. There are many similarities with the fight for a free market in money, the unadulterated gold standard.

One of them is that the old notions of “liberal” and “conservative” seem almost inapplicable. It used to be that “conservatives” in the U.S. were in favor of more freedom and less government, at least nominally. But today, that’s not necessarily so. Wall Street is generally “conservative” and they are for a central bank, and its endless acts of Quantitative Easing.

Similarly, Republicans and “conservatives” are now coming out in favor of the National Security Agency, and defending its spying on American citizens. They do this in the wake of pervasive abuses that Snowden has disclosed. The Stasi could never have dreamed of some of the capabilities used against every American every day by the NSA, such as mass scanning of emails and phone calls, much less automatically building a list of contacts for each citizen or tracking everyone’s whereabouts in realtime.

Support for the NSA fits with conservatives’ strong support for “homeland security”. This term has been completely perverted, in a way that would make George Orwell proud. It is now about subjecting citizen-serfs to every conceivable inconvenience and intrusion, especially when they dare to travel by airplane, talk on the phone, send an email, get health care, or pay taxes. Instead of protecting the rights of the people, security agencies now exist to attack them.

Those who would defend the security establishment and the nascent police state may be “conservative” but they are no friends of man’s rights or of freedom. Some are blind ideologues, others are ignorant dupes, and many are just profiteering government contractors. It doesn’t matter; they are defending the indefensible.

It is shocking that people who grew up in a free country would staunchly support “fundamentally transforming” America into tyranny. And that’s what it’s about, tyranny and ultimately murder. There is no other reason to build a surveillance machine capable of watching everyone constantly, a healthcare system in which government bureaucrats make every life or death decision, a tax agency that knows what you think and who you voted for—and a militarized police force.

It’s a good thing that information disclosed by Edward Snowden has roiled the American electorate. He just may have gotten through to people with a wake-up call. I hope it is in time to change course.

The fight against surveillance, censorship, and pseudo-security has another similarity with the fight against fiat currency. If we lose the battle, it’s lights out. Our civilization will collapse into a new Dark Age.

The fight for honest money is linked to the fight against the police state. A police state will destroy the productivity that still props up the debt that backs the dollar. Alternatively, a dollar collapse will drive desperate, hungry people into the streets. This would provide cover for a crackdown and dictatorship.

Liberty had better achieve victory on both fronts!

 

 

Keith Weiner is the president of the Gold Standard Institute USA


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/5UBMYAOmy3c/story01.htm Gold Standard Institute

Former Top NSA Official: “We Are Now In A Police State”

Bill Binney is the high-level NSA executive who created the agency’s mass surveillance program for digital information.  A 32-year NSA veteran widely regarded as a “legend” within the agency, Binney was the senior technical director within the agency and managed thousands of NSA employees.

Binney has been interviewed by virtually all of the mainstream media, including CBS, ABC, CNN, New York Times, USA Today, Fox News, PBS and many others.

Last year, Binney held his thumb and forefinger close together, and said:

We are, like, that far from a turnkey totalitarian state.

But today, Binney told Washington’s Blog that the U.S. has already become  a police state.

By way of background, the government is spying on virtually everything we do.

All of the information  gained by the NSA through spying is then shared with federal, state and local agencies, and they are using that information to prosecute petty crimes such as drugs and taxes. The agencies are instructed to intentionally “launder” the information gained through spying, i.e. to pretend that they got the information in a more legitimate way … and to hide that from defense attorneys and judges.

This is a bigger deal than you may realize, as legal experts say that there are so many federal and state laws in the United States, that no one can keep track of them all … and everyone violates laws every day without even knowing it.

The NSA also ships Americans’ most confidential, sensitive information to foreign countries like Israel (and here), the UK and other countries … so they can “unmask” the information and give it back to the NSA … or use it for their own purposes.

Binney told us today:

The main use of the collection from these [NSA spying] programs [is] for law enforcement. [See the 2 slides below].

 

These slides give the policy of the DOJ/FBI/DEA etc. on how to use the NSA data. In fact, they instruct that none of the NSA data is referred to in courts – cause it has been acquired without a warrant.

 

So, they have to do a “Parallel Construction” and not tell the courts or prosecution or defense the original data used to arrest people. This I call: a “planned programed perjury policy” directed by US law enforcement.

 

And, as the last line on one slide says, this also applies to “Foreign Counterparts.”

 

This is a total corruption of the justice system not only in our country but around the world. The source of the info is at the bottom of each slide. This is a totalitarian process – means we are now in a police state.

Here are the two slides which Binney pointed us to:

A slide from a presentation about a secretive information-sharing program run by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's Special Operations Division (SOD) is seen in this undated photo (Reuters / John Shiffman)

A slide from a presentation about a secretive information-sharing program run by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's Special Operations Division (SOD) is seen in this undated photo (Reuters / John Shiffman)

(Source: Reuters via RT)

We asked Binney a follow-up question:

You say “this also applies to ‘Foreign Counterparts.’”  Does that mean that foreign agencies can also “launder” the info gained from NSA spying?  Or that data gained through foreign agencies’ spying can be “laundered” and used by U.S
. agencies?

Binney responded:

For countries like the five eyes (US, Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand) and probably some others it probably works both ways.  But for others that have relationships with FBI or DEA etc.,  they probably are given the data to used to arrest people but are not told the source or given copies of the data.

(See this for background on the five eyes.)

View past discussions between Washington’s Blog and Binney here, here, here and here.

Bonus:


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/DeEUcGqS2L4/story01.htm George Washington

The Hangover From China’s Urbanization Boom

Authored by Andrew Batson and Tom Miller of Evergreen Gavekal,

As China’s leaders in recent weeks have laid out an ambitious agenda for market-driven economic reforms, one element has been strangely lacking: urbanization. Premier Li Keqiang made this his signature issue during his years as deputy to the former premier, and has frequently talked up the potential for urbanization to drive China’s future growth. Yet, a coherent urbanization policy has been nowhere to be found, as Li’s desire for a healthier, more “people-focused” mode of urban growth clashed with local governments’ desire to keep spending on infrastructure and real estate.

This logjam looks to have finally broken over the weekend, when top Chinese leaders held both the annual Central Economic Work Conference to set policy goals for 2014, and a Central Urbanization Work Conference to lay the groundwork for an urbanization plan to be published next year. On balance, the news from these events is good for current and future residents of Chinese cities—but bad for those investors who may still be bullish on commodity prices.

As the chart below shows, the acceleration in urbanization over the last decade was accompanied by a rise in global commodity prices, thanks to a surge in raw material demand from construction. However, the pace of physical urbanization is far more likely to slow than to accelerate—a trend already reflected in the flat performance of global commodity prices. Rather than dreaming up new ways of driving urban expansion, the leadership in Beijing has become increasingly concerned about the excesses committed by city governments who all want to be the next Shanghai. “Not every city can become a giant,” warned the statement released from the urbanization conference. It emphasized that urbanization is a natural economic process, and that the government should be removing artificial barriers rather than trying to force urban growth through administrative decrees.

At the Central Economic Work Conference held a year ago, the top six priorities included a call for “actively promoting” urbanization since it has “the most potential for expanding domestic demand.” At this year’s conference, promoting urbanization did not make it into the list of priorities at all; in its place was a call to control the risks of the debts accumulated by local governments in their heedless drive for expanding cities. The change in direction could not be clearer. Rather than try to launch a new round of urbanization-led growth, the new leadership is instead focused on cleaning up the social and financial consequences of the past decade’s urbanization boom. The issues that need tackling include: a marginalized population of rural migrant workers; high local government debt; an oversupply of housing in many cities.

As we have long argued, the issue that China faces is not that urbanization is too slow and needs to accelerate, but that the urbanization that is happening is incomplete. Ineligible for core urban services like education and healthcare, most rural migrants find it hard to settle down permanently in cities or advance into higher-paying white-collar jobs. The “new-style” and “people-focused” urbanization that Premier Li has been promoting is essentially about better integrating existing migrants into the urban economy and society. Ultimately this is a question of money: allowing rural migrants to access the same benefits as existing urban residents will require new sources of and structures for public spending. The details of how this change will work are still unclear, but will likely involve both the central government taking more fiscal responsibility for public services, and local authorities getting more fund-raising powers.

As these problems are sorted out, the pace of urbanization will decelerate—a natural consequence of the slowdown in overall economic growth, and therefore of the job creation that drives rural-urban migration. The urban population has grown by about 21mn people a year since the late 1990s. Some scholars at the Development Research Center, a government think tank, expect the rate of urbanization is unlikely to exceed 17mn a year over the next decade—though we are somewhat more optimistic. In any case, the “people-focused” urbanization strategy will show up more as gains in urban incomes and consumption than as another surge in urban population growth and construction.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/8s5mN3oaMO8/story01.htm Tyler Durden

US Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network "Reaching Out" To Bitcoin Businesses

Recently some of the more naive, not to mention top-ticking, financial commentators assumed that just because US regulators had not snapped shut a trap surrounding Bitcoin and other digital currencies yet, that this state of blissful cohabitation would continue indefinitely. Unfortunately, as we warned back in March during the initial leg higher in BTC following the Cyprus deposit confiscations, the well-known “honeypot” strategy was meant to draw out as many digital currency fans and participants as possible – who after all were warned by none other than the ECB that the current regime will never adopt a parallel, and quite threatening monetary unit – only to see the regulatory and enforcement fist of the nation that (still) hosts the reserve currency slowly but surely start to clench around the binary currency.

 Because, finally, after testing the ground long enough, the fist is starting to not only close but squeeze tight. And as Reuters reports, it is the U.S. Treasury Department’s anti money-laundering unit that is now warning businesses linked to Bitcoin that they “may have to comply with federal law and regulation as money transmitters, a Treasury spokesman said. ” Specifically, the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has sent “industry outreach” letters to about a dozen firms, regarding potential anti-money laundering compliance obligations related to Bitcoin businesses, FinCEN spokesman Steve Hudak told Thomson Reuters’ regulatory information service Compliance Complete.

What is interesting is that unlike in traditional cases of money laundering, where the law is cut and dry, in the case of digital currencies, nobody really knows what the Treasury’s jurisdiction – if any – or the law is. Which is why FinCEN is not only treading lightly but effectively giving so-called offenders a warning in advance of potential future action.

According to Reuters, a legal expert with years of experience representing digital currency firms said FinCEN seemed to be establishing a new regulatory enforcement precedent by warning individual businesses of compliance obligations before taking action. “Is this setting a new standard that in the future if there are any questionable business models there will be notice given before any action is taken?” said Carol Van Cleef, a partner with the Washington law firm Patton Boggs LLP. In response, Hudak said the letters are an attempt at gathering information. He likened them to the letters that banks sometimes send to customers seeking information about the customer’s transactions in an effort to determine whether suspect transactions are truly linked to illicit activity.

Actually no: this is not a standard, new or otherwise, but is merely meant to telegraph the authorities displeasure with ongoing digital monetary activities, with an intent of halting all major activity before an enforcement mandate is handed down.

In the meantime, FinCEN’s letters have had a “chilling effect” on Bitcoin businesses, which are intimidated by the threat of civil and criminal sanctions for non-compliance, said Jon Matonis, executive director of the Bitcoin Foundation, an advocacy group. The firms, he said, may effectively be “put out of business in an extrajudicial manner.”

Which, basically, means the US government wants you to shut down regardless of what the law says. Which is precisely what happened with Utah’s digital-to-coin converter Casascius as we reported previously.

And, as Reuters further adds, the fist grab is almost ready to pulverize:

While some Bitcoin businesses reject FinCEN’s assertion that they are money transmitters, a number have still registered with the agency, a search of the Treasury bureau’s website shows.

FinCEN sent letters to Bitcoin-related businesses on the Internet that appeared to fall under its definition of money transmitters but had not registered, Hudak said. He said FinCEN will keep sending letters to unregistered Bitcoin businesses.

“As we come across them, and as people tip us off, we’ll make inquiries. That is part of what we do,” Hudak said.

Perhaps this explains why at last check Bitcoin was now under $700 and gradually drifting lower. After all Uncle Sam is no longer shy about his true intentions regarding the digital currency.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/IWLmo3bD4zQ/story01.htm Tyler Durden

US Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network “Reaching Out” To Bitcoin Businesses

Recently some of the more naive, not to mention top-ticking, financial commentators assumed that just because US regulators had not snapped shut a trap surrounding Bitcoin and other digital currencies yet, that this state of blissful cohabitation would continue indefinitely. Unfortunately, as we warned back in March during the initial leg higher in BTC following the Cyprus deposit confiscations, the well-known “honeypot” strategy was meant to draw out as many digital currency fans and participants as possible – who after all were warned by none other than the ECB that the current regime will never adopt a parallel, and quite threatening monetary unit – only to see the regulatory and enforcement fist of the nation that (still) hosts the reserve currency slowly but surely start to clench around the binary currency.

 Because, finally, after testing the ground long enough, the fist is starting to not only close but squeeze tight. And as Reuters reports, it is the U.S. Treasury Department’s anti money-laundering unit that is now warning businesses linked to Bitcoin that they “may have to comply with federal law and regulation as money transmitters, a Treasury spokesman said. ” Specifically, the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has sent “industry outreach” letters to about a dozen firms, regarding potential anti-money laundering compliance obligations related to Bitcoin businesses, FinCEN spokesman Steve Hudak told Thomson Reuters’ regulatory information service Compliance Complete.

What is interesting is that unlike in traditional cases of money laundering, where the law is cut and dry, in the case of digital currencies, nobody really knows what the Treasury’s jurisdiction – if any – or the law is. Which is why FinCEN is not only treading lightly but effectively giving so-called offenders a warning in advance of potential future action.

According to Reuters, a legal expert with years of experience representing digital currency firms said FinCEN seemed to be establishing a new regulatory enforcement precedent by warning individual businesses of compliance obligations before taking action. “Is this setting a new standard that in the future if there are any questionable business models there will be notice given before any action is taken?” said Carol Van Cleef, a partner with the Washington law firm Patton Boggs LLP. In response, Hudak said the letters are an attempt at gathering information. He likened them to the letters that banks sometimes send to customers seeking information about the customer’s transactions in an effort to determine whether suspect transactions are truly linked to illicit activity.

Actually no: this is not a standard, new or otherwise, but is merely meant to telegraph the authorities displeasure with ongoing digital monetary activities, with an intent of halting all major activity before an enforcement mandate is handed down.

In the meantime, FinCEN’s letters have had a “chilling effect” on Bitcoin businesses, which are intimidated by the threat of civil and criminal sanctions for non-compliance, said Jon Matonis, executive director of the Bitcoin Foundation, an advocacy group. The firms, he said, may effectively be “put out of business in an extrajudicial manner.”

Which, basically, means the US government wants you to shut down regardless of what the law says. Which is precisely what happened with Utah’s digital-to-coin converter Casascius as we reported previously.

And, as Reuters further adds, the fist grab is almost ready to pulverize:

While some Bitcoin businesses reject FinCEN’s assertion that they are money transmitters, a number have still registered with the agency, a search of the Treasury bureau’s website shows.

FinCEN sent letters to Bitcoin-related businesses on the Internet that appeared to fall under its definition of money transmitters but had not registered, Hudak said. He said FinCEN will keep sending letters to unregistered Bitcoin businesses.

“As we come across them, and as people tip us off, we’ll make inquiries. That is part of what we do,” Hudak said.

Perhaps this explains why at last check Bitcoin was now under $700 and gradually drifting lower. After all Uncle Sam is no longer shy about his true intentions regarding the digital currency.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/IWLmo3bD4zQ/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Guest Post: Starvation And Military Keynesianism: Lessons From Nazi Germany

Submitted by Julian Adorney of the Ludwig von Mises Institute,

Many Americans, from the Glenview State Bank of Chicago to author Ellen Brown assume that the Nazi economic regime was successful, but closer examination tells a tale of rationing, shortages, and starvation. Learning why their economy failed can teach us how to avoid the same fate.

 

Background

The myth endures that after Hitler inherited a country ravaged by the Great Depression in 1933, his aggressive policies turned the nation around and created an economic powerhouse. But the truth, as Professor Evans of the University of Cambridge argues in his seminal history The Third Reich Trilogy, is something far different.

Evans, a Marxist sympathetic to Keynes and state intervention, nonetheless tells a story of rationing, shortages, and misery in the Third Reich. The Reich Food Estate, the state-controlled corporation responsible for agricultural production, regularly failed to feed its people. Agricultural output rarely surpassed 1913 levels, in spite of 20 years of technological advancement. Demand outstripped supply by 30 percent in basic foodstuffs like pork, fruit, and fats. That meant that for every ten German workers who stood in line to buy meat from the state-owned supply depots, three went home hungry.

The same story was retold when it came to cars, clothing, and iron. New houses had to be built with wooden plumbing, because iron was so scarce. Nationalized iron depots couldn’t produce enough for the army, let alone civilians. Clothing was rationed. Fuel and rubber shortages led to what one US observer called, “drastic restrictions on the use of motor vehicles.” Of course, because the state dictated which car and truck models could be produced, there weren’t very many motor vehicles to begin with.

The overall tale is one of misery for the average German citizen. So how did the Nazis so hurt their people, and what lessons can we learn?

 

Lesson 1: Military Keynesianism Produces Austerity

Hitler’s rearmament program was military Keynesianism on a vast scale. Hermann Goering, Hitler’s economic administrator, poured every available resource into making planes, tanks, and guns. In 1933 German military spending was 750 million Reichsmarks. By 1938 it has risen to 17 billion with 21 percent of GDP was taken up by military spending. Government spending all told was 35 percent of Germany’s GDP.

Many liberals, especially Paul Krugman, routinely argue that our stimulus programs in America aren’t big enough, so when they fail it’s not an indictment of Keynesianism. Fair enough. But no-one could say that Hitler’s rearmament program was too small. Economists expected it to create a multiplier effect and jump-start a flagging economy. Instead, it produced military wealth while private citizens starved. Employed on the largest scale ever seen, military Keynesianism created only ruin.

 

Lesson 2: Production, Not Jobs

Economist Joan Robinson wrote that, “Hitler had found a cure against unemployment before Keynes finished explaining it.” And indeed, rearmament and nationalized industry put every available German to work. There were so many jobs that the Nazis complained of a labor shortage and brought women in to the workplace, even though they were ideologically opposed to it. Unemployment had been cured. And yet, the people routinely suffered shortages. Civilian wood and iron were rationed. Small businesses, from artisans to carpenters to cobblers, went under. Citizens could barely buy pork, and buying fat to make a luxury like a cake was impossible. Rationing and long lines at the central supply depots the Nazis installed became the norm.

Nazi Germany proves that curing unemployment should not be an end in itself. No doubt, jobs are important. But they are important for what they produce, not just by virtue of existing. Real growth means production of what people demand. It means making cars, growing food, building laptops, or commercial planes. Private production grows the economic pie and helps everyone to prosper. Without production, all that a job does is change a man from starving and unemployed to starving and employed.

 

Moving Forward

There are a thousand lessons to be learned from the Third Reich, from the evils of totalitarianism to the dangers of racial thinking. A key economic lesson is that, rather than curing the Great Depression, Hitler’s military Keynesianism on a massive scale left the German people starving and short of goods. It’s a lesson advocates of building tanks to make us rich, from John McCain to Paul Krugman (and now Shinzo Abe), would do well to learn.


    




via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/kmJ3oJQy0I8/story01.htm Tyler Durden