“Make America Great Again” Listed On Cali College’s “White Supremacy” Pyramid

“Make America Great Again” Listed On Cali College’s “White Supremacy” Pyramid

Authored by Fiona Moriarty-McLaughlin via Campus Reform,

San Diego City College hosted a white supremacist seminar in early October, distributing flyers claiming that cultural appropriation, “racist mascots,” and “Make America Great Again” are instances of white supremacy.

The event, “Confronting White Supremacy through the Arts” was hosted by co-directors of the World Cultures program at SDCC, professors Michelle Chan and Maria-Jose Zeledon-Perez.

“Come join us in confronting White Supremacy through students’ performances,” read a promotional flyer for the event, photographed by Campus Reform. “Prior to the performances, guest speakers will set the stage and contextualize what white supremacy is, its areas of activity, and how rampant it is in our society, curriculum, mindsets, and media.”

Event attendees received multiple worksheets, supposedly visualizing white supremacy.

One pyramid ranked white supremacy on a scale of “Overt White Supremacy (Socially Unacceptable)” to “Covert White Supremacy (Socially Acceptable).” Items on the former side of the pyramid included the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, and the n-word.

But “covert white supremacy,” according to SDCC, includes “Make America Great Again,” cultural appropriation, Columbus Day celebration, and “racist mascots.”

Another white supremacy pyramid classified “Euro-centric curriculum” and “claiming reverse racism” as “veiled racism” and “funding schools locally” as “discrimination.”

SDCC sophomore Daimeon Rodriguez attended the event and suggested to Campus Reform that he was worried about being threatened.

“I had my MAGA hat on campus and had to hide it in worry of being threatened or targeted with speech or allegations again by another student,” Rodriguez said.

“I attended the end of the event to see that they had multiple students performing acts such as rapping, poems, singing that were directed towards the current administration and people who either support or follow the current president/administration. Some of the topics included some of the misinformation about people like me (Trump supporters).”

SDCC also distributed a white supremacy wheel. It broke down the origins of white supremacy on a global scale, tying the concept to fields ranging from economics and education to sex and religion.

SDCC did not return a request for comment in time for publication.


Tyler Durden

Wed, 10/09/2019 – 13:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/35gIyOx Tyler Durden

Strong 10Y Treasury Sold At Lowest Yield Since August 2016

Strong 10Y Treasury Sold At Lowest Yield Since August 2016

While yesterday’s 3Y auction was strong if not spectacular, today’s 10Y auction was a bit more impressive.

Printing at a high yield of 1.590%, the auction stopped through the When Issued 1.591% by 0.1bps. It was the lowest stop out for a 10Y auction – technically a 9-year 10-month reopening – since August 2016, and only the 3rd highest stop out for a 10Y auction on record with the 1.459% July 2012 yield the lowest recorded print. It was also the first 10Y auction since May that did not tail.

Just like in yesterday’s 3Y auction, the Bid to Cover was almost unchanged at 2.43, down from 2.46 in September, but above the 2.38 six auction average.

The internals were ever so slighly on the weak side, with the Indirects taking down 58.5%, down from 62.6% last month and below the 61.1 recent average, and with Directs taking 12.8%, largely in line with recent auctions, it left Dealers holding 28.7% of the auction, slightly above last month’s 24.7% and the 26.2% recent average.

Overall, a strong auction largely the result of the selloff in the 10Y ahead of 1pm, which dragged the yield on the benchmark paper from 1.53% to a high of 1.59% just before the auction.

And now we look to tomorrow’s 30Y auction which closes this week’s coupon calendar.


Tyler Durden

Wed, 10/09/2019 – 13:15

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2nAB8EY Tyler Durden

“Ghost Town” – Russian Crew Films Hastily-Abandoned US Base In Syria As Turks Move In

“Ghost Town” – Russian Crew Films Hastily-Abandoned US Base In Syria As Turks Move In

While limited groups of Turkish infantry forward deployments have crossed into northeast Syria, seeking to move US-allied Kurdish forces away from its border, as Bloomberg reported this morning, we now have the first on the ground visual confirmation of a US troop exit from key border posts

A Russian film crew with RT appears to have gained access to the now abandoned US military base in Tel Arqam, near the town of Ras al-Ain along the Syrian-Turkish border.

Describing it as appearing like a “ghost town” after American special forces have moved, presumably further inland to another US base east of the Euphrates, the base which lies but a few kilometers away from the Turkish border has been “completely abandoned” of US forces, with a few Kurdish fighters left. 

The report describes of the US abandoned Tel Arqam base:

Constructed of wood, metal and plastic, the base houses several barracks and command facilities, while its barbed wire defenses and watchtowers remain erected around the perimeter. Yet, all the US troops have already withdrawn, leaving what once were battle positions and the surrounding area empty. A handful of Kurdish fighters are the only people seen in the footage, who now solemnly watch guard over the base.

This as the full Turkish assault has begun, with Turkish F-16s now bombing targets in northeast Syria’s Ras al-Ayn and Sarekaniye, and as SDF leaders are making a last ditch appeal to Washington for a ‘No Fly Zone’. 

The White House’s Sunday night statement essentially giving the ‘green light’ for Erdogan’s invasion, dubbed ‘Operation Peace Spring’, has angered current and former US defense officials involved over the past few in partnering with and training the SDF.

RT/Ruptly shot of abandoned US military base in Tel Arqam, near the town of Ras al-Ain along the Syrian-Turkish border.

Trump, however, rejected the charge that he has “abandoned” the Kurds, saying on Monday they are a “special people and wonderful fighters”.

He warned Turkey of “economic devastation” if implementation of their proposed ‘safe zone’ led to any “unnecessary fighting” — despite Erdogan and other top Turkish officials vowing to “correct the demographics,” which many have taken to mean ethnic cleansing and mass relocation of the region’s Kurdish community. 

Clearly Erdogan has remained unmoved by such White House warnings, however, it appears the Pentagon is thus far going along with Ankara’s ‘safe zone’ narrative.


Tyler Durden

Wed, 10/09/2019 – 13:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2osfWBp Tyler Durden

The Global Pastime Of Kicking The Can Down The Road

The Global Pastime Of Kicking The Can Down The Road

Authored by Bruce Wilds via Advancing Time blog,

Nowhere is the trend of kicking the can down the road more prevalent than in government. Consider this a tribute to politicians and governments everywhere that postpone and delay taking necessary actions. Frequently for politicians, the goal of being reelected takes priority over doing the right thing. This is why  those in office often surrender their better judgment as they go seeking jobs and economic growth at any cost. The idea of paying later for a hamburger today is very seductive for those in this state of mind.

This explains why we constantly see government bargaining with, and making concessions to companies like Amazon to locate facilities in their State. This is done to gain a few jobs with little thought to the long-term consequences. Sometimes it is exempting sales tax, sometimes it is giving the company free utility build-outs, forgiving property taxes, or seeing they are granted special pricing and privileges when it comes to delivering their goods. I use Amazon as an example because it uses all these methods to gain an advantage and exploit its competitors. Sadly, the toll Amazon takes on the brick and mortar stores that line the streets of our cities and neighborhoods is just now becoming apparent.

The sweet allure of getting and receiving the benefits while setting back the negatives is not new or is the desire from which it flows. Getting something for nothing is often the catalyst for bad policy. This is apparent in our healthcare system when it comes to the Affordable Care Act or what is still commonly known as Obamacare. After promises the ACA would lower healthcare costs while extending coverage to millions of Americans the decision was made to phase it in.  In just a few years we have seen healthcare cost soar moving Obamacare towards the brink of failure. As usual, those handed the task of cleaning up such a mess are faced with the unpopular job of making many people unhappy so they do nothing.

When politicians give one company an advantage over another you could say the government has entered the game of choosing winners and losers. States are also lowering the ability of some companies to compete and in the long run can lose more jobs than are created in the short term. In Fort Wayne, Indiana years ago the city backed a bond and the loan to build a massive hangar at the airport for an air-freight company named Kitty Hawk. In return the company promised a slew of new jobs when they located their hub in the city, Kitty Hawk is now bankrupt and the jobs are gone. With the taxpayers of Fort Wayne now paying for an empty hanger that they are trying to lease at an aggressively low price. this means private investors and property owners that lease building space are taking a hit as they are forced to compete against the government to which they are forced to pay taxes. This goes past the issue of fairness and into an area where companies are disincentivized to invest.

National Debt Now Almost 23 Trillion Not 12!

The Devil is in the details when these so-called “pay you later” deals are crafted. When dealing with the Devil we often pay a price far greater than anticipated. It is not uncommon to find promises broken and estimates way off the mark as to the final costSadly, the National Debt Clock is rapidly moving towards the 23 trillion dollar mark. The chart to the right predicted that by 2019 the national debt would top 12 trillion dollars, boy they really missed that one! Projections made by the government or any group predicting budgets based on events that may or may not happen at some future date are simply predictions and not fact. This means that such numbers are totally unreliable.

Another place the effort to obtain a free lunch or at least to get a big discount on it can be seen in the explosion of Public-private partnerships. Over the years we have been hearing a lot of good things about “Public-Private Partnerships” and how they can propel forward needed projects by adding an incentive for the private sector to undertake projects they might choose not to do alone. Often this is because the numbers often simply don’t work. These collaborations between government and a private-sector company while touted as our salvation tend to create boondoggles and white elephants.

These projects are often haunted by problems that go from one extreme to another ranging from over-engineering to shoddy work with little oversight. Risks are frequently distributed between the public and private partners according to the ability of each to assess, control and cope with them. The risk-sharing may be in the form of “guaranteeing” a certain occupancy such as was the case of a hotel recently constructed where I live, or the government may pick up part of the cost of the project by providing low-cost loans or supplying part of the infrastructure needed for the project to proceed.

Expensive studies paid for by the government to determine whether a project is viable or needed by a community is often the first step down this slippery slope. Public officials constantly promote and undertake glorious and unsustainable projects to better their communities at little or no cost. This can be seen in situations where the public partner agrees to guarantee a minimum occupancy or income if it turns out that there are fewer users or demand for the service or infrastructure than expected. Fortunately for the public officials involved it generally takes years before anyone notices how toxic many of these projects are and voters seldom are focused enough to hold them accountable.

The lesson is that there is no such thing as a free lunch. Delaying payment should be viewed as sidestepping reality rather than a solution. Short-sighted attempts to sidestep real structural failures and problems are usually doomed to fail. Real problems must be addressed with real solutions not just promises of future action or put off until a later date. Not taking the proper steps to set things right often causes more problems down the road.

Winston Churchill said, “The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place, we are entering a period of consequences.”

My point is that sooner or later the piper always demands his due. 


Tyler Durden

Wed, 10/09/2019 – 12:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2Vwyr3F Tyler Durden

Chaos On Wall Street: Ex-Nasdaq CEO Warns IPO Implosion Reminds Him Of “Dot Com Era”

Chaos On Wall Street: Ex-Nasdaq CEO Warns IPO Implosion Reminds Him Of “Dot Com Era”

As we’ve been reporting in the last several months, the proverbial tide has gone out – and those institutions exposed to overvalued technology unicorns are the ones swimming naked.

Shares of Lyft, Uber, Slack, Peloton, to name a few, have imploded after debuting on the public markets. Even WeWork, who couldn’t even get listed, saw valuations collapse after its IPO was shelved. 

The turmoil on Wall Street has been highlighted in a recent interview with former Nasdaq CEO Bob Greifeld, whose new warning about the IPO market reminded him of the days of the dot-com era. We all know what happened shortly after that.

In a CNBC “Squawk Box” interview Monday, Greifeld warned that the 2019 IPO market reminds him of the dot-com bubble. 

“It’s important to recognize that the IPO market was getting quite bubbly [nowadays],” said Greifeld. 

He said technology unicorns with multi-billion-dollar valuations had some of the worst IPO debuts in quite some time. 

As seen below, shares of Uber, Lyft, and Peloton have been huge flops this year.  

 

 

“In a sense, it reminded me back of the dot-com era, when you had companies going public that had no known path to profitability,” said Greifeld. 

Greifeld also referenced the WeWork implosion, which saw its IPO shelved and valuation collapse in a spectacular fashion.

“That to me was in some ways a parody of some of the hubris you see in the start-ups,” he said.

Greifeld said the IPO market is still open this year, despite the recent blow-ups.

In the last several weeks, we’ve documented how the global IPO and M&A markets are starting to falter.

Greifeld’s latest warning suggests that 2020 could be an absolute bloodbath for technology companies. 

The US economy is likely to decelerate through 4Q19, as inflation, manufacturing, and employment are in growth rate downturns. We’ve noted how a manufacturing recession has successfully transmitted into services and employment, indicating that a much broader slowdown is ahead. All of this signals that a recession could be imminent, and explains why tech unicorn valuations are imploding, anyone overexposed to tech is swimming naked


Tyler Durden

Wed, 10/09/2019 – 12:26

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/35noslF Tyler Durden

AOC Suddenly Flip-Flops, Now Thinks Pulling Out Of Syria Is Terrible Idea

AOC Suddenly Flip-Flops, Now Thinks Pulling Out Of Syria Is Terrible Idea

Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,

Trump Derangement syndrome on full display…

After months and months of criticizing US involvement in ‘forever wars’, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has had a sudden change of mind, tweeting Tuesday that pulling US troops out of Syria could have ‘catastrophic  consequences’.

Of course, her only reason for adopting this position now is that she will oppose literally anything President Trump does.

Last year AOC ran for Congress on a promise of working to remove troops from  Syria and elsewhere:

“Alexandria believes that we must end the “forever war” by bringing our troops home, and ending the air strikes that perpetuate the cycle of terrorism throughout the world,” her 2018 campaign website noted.

She has repeatedly criticized ‘endless war’:

But now suddenly, AOC is OK with US troops staying in Syria, because… ORANGE MAN BAD.

The response was swift:

Meanwhile, some administration officials are already trying to walk back Trump’s withdrawal statements.

An anonymous senior administration official told reporters Monday “the U.S. is not removing its forces from Syria in the face of a Turkish incursion.”

Rather, the president ordered roughly 50 special operations troops in northern Syria to relocate to a different part of the country after he learned that Turkey has planned an offensive against U.S.-backed Kurdish forces in Syria. The official said that offensive had not yet begun.

Furthermore, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper tweeted then deleted the following:

It seems as if the deep state is once again papering over Trump’s promises, and the media is in lockstep.


Tyler Durden

Wed, 10/09/2019 – 12:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2MkVRVq Tyler Durden

The next big investment trend is on sale right now

In July 1994, an ex-hedge fund VP left his cushy Wall Street job and started a new company called Cadabra, Inc.

He wanted to capitalize on an emerging trend that was called the “Information Superhighway” back then, what we now know today as the Internet.

Cadabra was an early ‘dot-com’ company. But as more and more people started accessing the Internet in the mid-1990s, the number of dot-com companies exploded.

Before long, there were countless entrepreneurs raising billions of dollars and taking their dot-com companies public.

Most of these companies were losing tons of money and had no hope of ever turning a profit.

But investors didn’t care. The Internet was the next big thing, and the stock prices of even the stupidest dot-com companies were soaring to record highs.

The bubble eventually burst. Investors collectively lost more than $5 trillion as the share prices of dot-com companies plummeted. Most dot-coms went out of business altogether.

Cadabra was one of the few dot-com businesses that survived the crash. But by then, of course, it had already changed its name to Amazon.

This is the nature of just about every major emerging investment trend.

It starts in a quiet stealth phase where only a handful of people even know the opportunity exists.

It then slowly builds momentum as savvy investors and fund managers catch on. And then it eventually becomes mainstream and turns into a giant frenzy.

Finally, just like investor euphoria sent prices to irrational highs, the bubble ultimately bursts, investors panic, and prices crash to irrational lows.

At the end of the cycle, sanity is finally restored, and a handful of Phoenixes rise from the ashes.

That’s what happened with the dot-com bubble. And we saw this play out recently with crypto as well.

Ten years ago, nobody even knew what Bitcoin was. Only a handful of very technical people had heard of it, let alone understood it.

Over time, as the price of Bitcoin grew and as more people started learning about it, crypto became mainstream.

Retail investors piled in and bid crypto prices up to record highs. And soon after, the market collapsed by 80%, wiping out countless phony crypto businesses that had no chance of success.

Yet there are a number of crypto companies that did survive the crash– companies which are presently working on financial technology that could radically change the way we do business.

Right now we’re seeing another bubble burst in the cannabis industry.

There’s been a thriving black market in cannabis for as long as anyone can remember.

But several years ago a nascent industry was born based on an emerging legalization trend in places like Colorado and Canada.

Tons of companies started applying for government-issued licenses to cultivate and sell cannabis, and investors threw billions of dollars at these businesses.

Many cannabis companies even went public, commanding market valuations as high as $15 billion.

But that bubble has started to burst; some of the biggest players in the industry have seen their share prices decline by as much as 80% after releasing pitiful financial results.

Just like any other bubble, many of these companies are going to get wiped out. They’ve spent the last few years creating hype, rather than working diligently to build a real business.

And the cannabis industry undoubtedly comes with additional complications.

It’s important to remember that cannabis is a commodity product; for the most part, there’s very little difference between one company’s cannabis and another company’s cannabis.

Think of it like flying from New York to London; consumers just want a cheap ticket and don’t really care whether they fly British Airways, Delta, Virgin, etc.

Buying cannabis is not like buying Gucci bag where consumers are willing to fork over a LOT more money specifically to own that brand.

People just want good quality and a great price, regardless of who grows the product.

Commodity businesses are highly competitive and tend to result in price wars. It’s great for consumers, but it squeezes profit margins for the producers.

It’s even worse in the cannabis industry, because there are still plenty of unlicensed (illegal) producers out there who don’t have to jump through the same regulatory hoops.

This means that the illegal producers can offer their products cheaper, taking revenue away from many licensed growers.

But there will be Phoenixes rising from the ashes of this bubble as well.

I’ve seen a number of headlines lately about the ‘death of cannabis,’ which to me is totally ridiculous.

The Internet didn’t go away after the dot-com bubble burst in 2000. Neither did Blockchain or Distributed Ledger Technology vanish after the crypto crash of 2018.

Cannabis isn’t going away either.

This is an enormous trend with hundreds of millions of consumers worldwide. And big corporations in a variety of industries– tobacco, biotech, beverages, consumer products– want a piece of this.

It’s not just recreational use. Non-psychoactive CBD oil has an astonishing number of consumer applications, from anti-aging to physical therapy to cancer treatment.

And once sanity has been restored, some clear winners will emerge… companies with credible, profitable, long-term visions who have been building professional, scalable businesses with low-cost, consistent, high quality production.

The “low cost” part is critical. The key to being profitable in a commodity business is high quality, inexpensive production.

Canada, Colorado, and California are incredibly expensive places to grow cannabis (not to mention the Netherlands and Luxembourg).

So the handful of fully licensed companies who are legally producing high quality product in low cost equatorial regions in Latin America have an enormous advantage.

Most likely the ‘Cadabra of cannabis’ already exists. It’s going to survive this burst, and go on to thrive.

And the enormous potential in the cannabis industry is definitely not going away. It’s just getting started.

So this is definitely an investment trend worth paying attention to– and in some respects, it’s on sale right now.

Source

from Sovereign Man https://ift.tt/35lZovF
via IFTTT

WeWork Competitors Are Dancing On Its Grave After Historic IPO Collapse

WeWork Competitors Are Dancing On Its Grave After Historic IPO Collapse

The WeWork fairy tale has obviously come to an end for the time being, as the company was forced to pull its IPO amidst a chorus of skepticism and outright ridicule after filing its IPO prospectus earlier this year.

And now, the little companies that WeWork trampled on to make its mad dash into becoming the unprofitable behemoth it is today are all ready to strike back, according to Bloomberg

“Happy birthday to me, happy birthday to me,” sang a senior executive of another co-working company who asked not to be identified.

After WeWork’s historic collapse at the doors of the public market, competitors like IWG Plc, Convene, Industrious and Knotel are now all pitching themselves as far more stable options for rental office space. 

In fact, three large U.S. landlords have even reached out to Novel Coworking to see if the company would be interested in buying or managing buildings leased to WeWork. 

Novel Chief Executive Officer Bill Bennett said: “Everyone is having conversations behind closed doors. People are trying to find their plan B and plan C.”

It’s a far cry from when WeWork employees would visit competitors, posing as customers, and perform business intelligence recon by photographing their tenant lists and contacting customers with incentives to move. WeWork would also sometimes set up outside of competitors offices with games and couches to try and pitch customers as they walked by. Up until this summer, WeWork was adding more than 1 million square feet per month and had become the biggest private-sector tenant in London, New York and Washington.

WeWork employees told Bloomberg they hadn’t even heard of the IPO troubles (yeah, sure), while customers say that the company’s day to day feels normal. 

According to the Wall Street Journal, Nori Gerardo Lietz, a senior lecturer at Harvard Business School said of WeWork’s IPO:

 “Their whole approach is at best sloppy, because a lot of the important numbers don’t tick and tie, and at worst it could be obfuscation. I prefer to think it’s just sloppy.”

The company’s bizarre IPO prospectus wasn’t even taken seriously by the company’s own employees, according to the WSJ:

Numerous current and former We employees believe the IPO prospectus was poorly written and delivered a muddled message about their business. They cite the document’s dedication, “to the energy of we—greater than any one of us but inside each of us.”

Wall Street banks, as well as top-tier law firms Skadden Arps Meagher & Flom LLP and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, were involved in preparing the prospectus. But Mr. Neumann often rejected the recommendations of bankers—he only selected lead book-runners JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in the runup to the planned IPO.

The IPO failed to mention the company’s $60 million private jet (which is now being sold) and numerous other simple questions that should be part and parcel with any comprehensive public company disclosure:

The document leaves unanswered some basic questions about the company’s finances. For example: How many new workstations did We deliver in the first half of this year? The prospectus filed in August said 273,000. Barely a month later, an amended version said 106,000. What was the total gross cost? In August, We said $1.3 billion. In September: $800 million. The reason for the dramatic changes is that the first version was wrong, people familiar with the matter said.

The document also wasn’t clear on some important governance issues. A draft prospectus filed last year said Mr. Neumann was on the We compensation committee in 2017, meaning he would have a say in his own compensation. The August prospectus never stated that Mr. Neumann was on the committee in 2018.

And should WeWork ever try to IPO again, it could wind up being even more difficult. Erik Gerding, a law professor at the University of Colorado said: “WeWork would be under a microscope with regulators in its next IPO go-round.”

In addition to WeWork’s IPO woes, its founder has stepped down and the company could run out of cash as early as next spring.

Landlords can’t help but notice this uncertainty: deals for two offices in London leased mostly to WeWork are in jeopardy and the company has pulled out of an agreement to rent space in Dublin. Landlords in New York and London are both bracing for “any drop in demand”. 

While landlords scramble to cover their asses, the company’s competitors view WeWork’s implosion as a great time to “grab market share”. 

Meanwhile, Ryan Simonetti, CEO of New York-based Convene, which specializes in flexible meeting, events and office space said: “WeWork was a competitor vying for space in Nashville, San Francisco, London and Boston but since filing their S-1, they’re no longer in the mix. This has created a tremendous opportunity for us to tell our story and show not just existing landlord partners, but potential ones, how different our model is.”

Laura Kozelouzek, CEO of Quest Workspaces, said: “I see this as a much-needed return to pragmatism for the industry. It’s going to be a rough ride for a number of owners and landlords as WeWork pulls back, but there will be some great opportunities as well.”

Industrious CEO Jamie Hodari said: “There’s no question it’s a good thing for Industrious. WeWork is still going to be a big formidable business, but they’re going to be a big formidable business that behaves more accordingly to the typical confines of how businesses behave, as they’re trying to march toward profitability and trying to sign prudent deals.”

His company has switched to management agreements with landlords instead of outright leases.

Simonetti continued: “We’re seeing landlords that are more committed to thinking about a partnership format instead of signing a new lease. The noise is forcing landlords to ask real questions, including ‘How profitable are you at a unit-level?’”

WeWork’s new CEOs are doing damage control, working to try and assure clients that this is just a “bump in the road”. And it’s again going back to its aggressive marketing roots. For example, Ed Schaepman, CEO of Tribes, said some of his prospective clients are being offered steep discounts by WeWork. Some prices offered have come in at just 30% of Tribes’ price points. 

Schaepman turned down WeWork as an investor in 2016. 

Eugene Lee, chief investment officer and global head of real estate at Knotel, said: “They’ve spent billions of dollars building out co-working facilities. The millions miles of glass partition that they used to be proud of, is now just something they have to deal with and you can’t make those partitions disappear.”


Tyler Durden

Wed, 10/09/2019 – 11:46

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2OByREv Tyler Durden

Five Questions That Frighten Impeachment-Focused Dems

Five Questions That Frighten Impeachment-Focused Dems

Authored by Graham Noble via LibertyNation.com,

As the phony impeachment investigation targeting President Donald Trump rumbles on, there really is no definitive list of questions that as yet remain unanswered. Were anyone to compile such a list, it would probably start with five questions that strike at the heart of the entire affair.

These questions clarify whether the current process is being conducted correctly or is colored by partisan hostility – and, indeed, whether the Russian “collusion” investigation was similarly tainted.

1. Ukraine-DNC Connection?

It seems curious, to say the least, that neither the FBI nor former special counsel Robert Mueller discovered the successful 2016 efforts by the Democratic National Committee to reach out to the Ukrainian government to provide dirt on Trump and his campaign associatesConsidering that both of those investigations were focused on uncovering a possible conspiracy with a foreign power to influence the presidential election, why was the Ukraine-DNC connection not looked into? It can only be gross incompetence or a deliberate decision to overlook that vital piece of the puzzle.

2. Anonymous Witnesses?

The so-called whistleblower who came forward with a complaint about the nature of the president’s phone conversation with the new Ukrainian president is hardly a credible witness since he or she had no firsthand knowledge of the call. Democrats are already making elaborate but secretive plans to extract testimony from this individual. Can his or her identity be kept from the public – and from the president – indefinitely?

The president’s opponents cannot possibly believe that they can impeach Trump using secondhand allegations provided by an anonymous source. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has vowed that, if Democrats refuse to identify this “whistleblower,” then he will ensure that any Senate impeachment trial will do so. Further, it would be necessary for the identities of White House sources from whom the whistleblower claims to have obtained information to be exposed.

Regardless of laws and rules designed to protect whistleblowers, any formal impeachment cannot be based upon testimony from unknown persons. Given that Democrats, since day one of the Trump presidency, have made no secret of their desire to impeach the president, the entire credibility of such an effort would stand or fall on complete transparency. The American public and the president himself deserve nothing less than to know the identities of the accusers and the sources from which they drew their information.

3. Another Whistleblower?

At least one additional whistleblower has now come forward, according to reports, but does this fact change anything? Indeed, the outrage over the phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky appears even more fabricated the more that anonymous individuals come forward with complaints. Already, it is highly suspicious that almost three weeks passed between the phone call itself and the filing of a complaint about what was said. Additional complaints filed even later hardly bolster the credibility of the case against Trump.

4. Schiff’s Role?

How has Rep. Adam Schiff’s (D-CA) role in this latest assault upon the president compromised the entire process? Schiff has been less than forthcoming about his knowledge of events or the extent to which his own staffers worked with the whistleblower even before any complaint was filed with the intelligence community’s inspector general.

Adam Schiff

As if the congressman were not already looking foolish and dishonest, his performance at a recent hearing was reason enough for Schiff to be compelled to recuse himself. During the event, he read out his own version of what Trump said to Zelensky – which bore no resemblance to the now-public transcript. The very idea that Schiff has either the capability or the desire to conduct a fair and objective investigation is utterly laughable.

5. Window Of Opportunity?

Finally, how big is the window of opportunity for congressional Democrats to impeach the president? They may have so far avoided making the process official, but articles of impeachment must, at some point, be brought to the floor of the House for a vote.

Once the opposition party chooses its presidential nominee, the campaign for the White House begins in earnest, and impeaching Trump during an election campaign is going to be seen as purely an attempt to influence the 2020 election – even by those Americans who do not already see it as such.

Democrats, therefore, have around eight months to conclude their investigations, draw up articles of impeachment, and bring them up for debate and a vote. The holiday season will take a bite out of that time, so the clock is ticking. The chances of impeachment going before the Senate before the 2020 Democratic National Convention are slim to none.

These five basic questions, when answered objectively, determine whether there is any realistic chance of Trump’s enemies removing him from office before the next election or this entire exercise is, for Democrats, a political catastrophe.


Tyler Durden

Wed, 10/09/2019 – 11:25

Tags

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2Mus50u Tyler Durden

Pro-Hong Kong Sixers Fan Booted From Philadelphia NBA Game

Pro-Hong Kong Sixers Fan Booted From Philadelphia NBA Game

A Philadelphia 76ers fan says he was tossed out of a preseason game after showing their support for pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong, according to NBC Philadelphia

NBA commissioner Adam Silver

Sam Wachs and his wife brought signs which read “Free Hong Kong” and “Free HK” to Tuesday night’s game between the Sixers and the Guangzhou Loong-Lions of the Chinese Basketball Association. According to Wachs, he lived in Hong Kong for two years and supports the anti-government movement. 

“We were just sitting in our seats near the Chinese bench,” said Wachs. 

As they were sitting, Wachs said security confiscated their signs. He then said they were kicked out of the game during the second quarter by security after they yelled, “Free Hong Kong.”

“We were saying, ‘Free Hong Kong,’’ Wachs told NBC10. “What’s wrong with that?” –NBC Philadelphia

The alleged incident is the latest in a string knee-bending to communist China after the NBA lost nearly all of its Chinese sponsors after a now-deleted pro-Hong Kong tweet by Houston Rockets general manager Daryl Morey triggered Beijing

The National Basketball Association lost almost all of its major Chinese sponsors in the country, the league’s biggest market outside the U.S., as the government flexes its economic muscle after a tweet backing Hong Kong’s protesters triggered a backlash.

A local joint venture of Nissan Motor Co. was the latest to distance itself from the U.S. league, joining China’s largest sportswear maker, the second-biggest dairy firm and a smartphone brand who all said they were pulling out. State television CCTV and tech giant Tencent Holdings Ltd. said Tuesday they won’t show NBA’s pre-season games.

In the latest China controversy involving the basketball organization, Beijing is resorting to a time-tested strategy of targeting businesses it deems to challenge its political interests — especially those questioning its sovereignty over certain territories. The furor, triggered by last week’s tweet by an official with the Houston Rockets, has imperiled the NBA in a multibillion-dollar market. –Bloomberg

“Beijing takes a zero-tolerance attitude to any perceived foreign interference in its internal affairs,” said said Hugo Brennan, principal Asia analyst at global risk consultancy Verisk Maplecroft (via Bloomberg), adding “This explains why it is adopting such a hard-line stance.”

Perhaps that explains why Rockets star James Harden was forced to grovel for yuans profusely apologized in an awkward on-camera moment; proclaiming “we love China” while standing next to All-star teammate Russell Westbrook. “For both of us individually, we go there once or twice a year. They show us the most important love,” he added. 

Awkward?

The pro-Hong Kong controversy comes as the NBA embarks on what was supposed to be a key week for the organization in China – with exhibition matches scheduled for the Brooklyn Nets (recently bought by Alibaba co-founder Joe Tsai, notes Bloomberg), who will face the Los Angeles Lakers in an Oct. 12 exhibition match in Shenzhen – near the border with Hong Kong. 

At this point, the game may be off due to the controversy despite both teams already being in Shanghai. Scheduled Wednesday press conferences were postponed “given the fluidity of the situation,” according to the league. 

A Wednesday evening “fan night” featuring NBA players and Chinese pop stars was canceled after local celebrities decided to pull out of the event

Workers were seen stripping a giant NBA banner in a mall in downtown Shanghai, while state-run CCTV said the league should apologize to Chinese fans and withdraw its comments. Some users demanded refunds from Tencent for their NBA subscriptions after the blackout of the preseason games.

The backlash has intensified after NBA Commissioner Adam Silver defended Morey’s right to free speech. Silver refused to apologize and said the NBA doesn’t dictate what people can or can’t say, sparking further anger in a nation that restricts free speech. China’s Communist Party-backed Global Times fired back in a tweet saying “free speech is never free.” –Bloomberg

After Silver’s comments, China’s state television network CCTV said in a WeChat post that he should sincerely apologize for the Chinese fans for “false comments that offended China.”

Meanwhile, as The Onion satirically reports: 

Chinese Officials Respond To NBA Controversy By Moving Millions Of Citizens To NHL Re-Fanification Camps

BEIJING—On the heels of recent pro-Hong Kong comments by Houston Rockets GM Daryl Morey, Chinese officials responded to the criticism Tuesday by moving millions of Chinese citizens to NHL re-fanification camps. “To show that China will not tolerate this flagrant disrespect for our nation amongst the ranks of the NBA, we intend to enlighten our citizens in the ways of the National Hockey League,” said Vice Premier Han Zheng, overseeing the first of many re-fanification ceremonies in a detention center outside of Beijing where citizens were encouraged at gunpoint to throw NBA merchandise into bonfires and subsequently issued compulsory Sidney Crosby jerseys, posters of the Toronto Maple Leafs, and Blu-ray copies of The Cutting Edge. “With this action, we will undo the harmful legacy of basketball on our nation’s psyche, using unyielding exposure to the ways in which hockey aligns with the values of China, a dynasty not unlike that of the Boston Bruins. By the time our citizens board their trains back home, they will not remember that such a thing as the NBA ever existed. All they will know is the joy of a slapshot, the grace of a goalie, and the unlimited potential of the St. Louis Blues in the postseason.” At press time, sources confirmed that officials were forcing unpaid re-fanification camp labor to construct hockey arenas nationwide. 


Tyler Durden

Wed, 10/09/2019 – 11:07

Tags

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2MpvOwx Tyler Durden