Which crime is the fault of my
political enemies? Take your pick.
The most recent crime attributed to somebody’s political enemies
is the Kansas
City Jewish community center shooting. Glenn Miller/Frazier
Glenn Cross, the alleged murderer in that incident, has very
distinct views of the sort that you might expect of a man who yells
“heil
Hitler” when arrested and is a
former Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan. That is, he’s
completely fucking out there with nothing more than an
opportunistic link to mainstream politics in this country (he ran
for office as
both a Democrat and Republican).
But why the hell not
lay his crime at the feet of former Rep. Ron Paul (and use that
as an excuse to dredge up old
attacks against the guy) because Miller said unsolicited (by
Paul) nice things about him?
The Southern Poverty Law Center’s Mark Potok, who has already
attributed opposition to President Barack Obama to racism, went
on MSNBC to link Miller’s crime to a supposed surge in hate groups
fueld by white fears over the “browning
of the American population.”
Or maybe the nutty neo-Nazi’s crime was
really the work of the lefty Nation‘s Max Blumenthal,
who is critical of Israel.
This kind of crazy has to be a one-off, right?
Nope. Hanging nasty crimes on political opponents is a popular
pastime, with conservatives and the Tea Party as the main
recipients in recent years of the most bogus links to shootings,
bombings, and the like.
The Boston bombing may have been the work of the the Tsarnaev
brothers, two Muslim extremists from Chechnya, but that didn’t stop
Michael Moore from
turning it into right-wing terrorism. “Tax Day.
Patriots Day,” he Tweeted.
NBC’s Luke Russert also
thought that was a fair conclusion.
Well, OK;
Infowars said the U.S. government did it. But really, that was
Infowars.
And Jared Loughner’s shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords
(D-Ariz.) was somehow the fault of
Sarah Palin and the
Tea Party. Those connections came even as some of those making
the charges, like Slate‘s
Jacob Weisberg, admitted the shooter was “crazy” and probably
suffered from “schizophrenia”—characteristics that would seem to
take political intentions out of the equation.
Occasionally, righties get to return the favor and link
their opponents to crimes—like the shooting at the Family
Research Council, which
Michelle Malkin hung around the neck of left-wing criticism of
the organization. Political opportunism, like crime, has no
intrinsic ideology of its own. But, as of late, this has mostly
been an intellectually lazy sport for liberals and progressives,
who see an opportunity to slam opponents without having to expend
too much brain sweat on actually examining ideas and arguments.
You know who was really responsible for those crimes? The
individuals who committed them, not some thoughts they may or may
not have shared with people who didn’t hurt anybody.
Below, see an excerpt from The Independents in which
Reason‘s own Matt Welch takes on political smears and
intellectual laziness.