An Indictment Accuses Three Cops and Two Paramedics of Killing Elijah McClain With a Cascade of Legal, Tactical, and Medical Errors


Elijah-McClain-selfie

On a Saturday night in August 2019, Elijah McClain was walking home from an Aurora, Colorado, convenience store, where he had just bought three cans of iced tea, when he was accosted by police, who ultimately killed him. McClain, a 23-year-old massage therapist, could not understand what he had done to provoke this confrontation—which is not surprising, because there was no legal justification for stopping, frisking, arresting, or assaulting him.

Yesterday, Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser announced that a statewide grand jury had indicted three officers and two paramedics who were involved in this baffling incident. The officers (Nathan Woodyard, Jason Rosenblatt, and Randy Roedema) and paramedics (Jeremy Cooper and Peter Cichuniec) face a total of 32 charges, including manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide, and second-degree assault.

“We have the solemn duty to prosecute this case and recognize that it will be difficult to prosecute—these types of cases always are,” Weiser said. “Our goal is to seek justice for Elijah McClain, for his family and friends, and for our state. In so doing, we advance the rule of law and the commitment that everyone is accountable and equal under the law.”

The rule of law was violated from the moment when Woodyard, responding to a 911 call from a teenager who thought McClain “look[ed] sketchy,” ordered McClain to stop. McClain, who was listening to music on earbuds, evidently did not hear Woodyard, and the situation immediately escalated.

Woodyard grabbed McClain, and he and Rosenblatt forced him to a grassy area, where they tackled him, applied a “carotid control” twice, handcuffed him, and pinned him to the ground as he temporarily lost consciousness, repeatedly vomited, and repeatedly complained that they were hurting him and that he could not breathe. Roedema joined the assault, using a “bar hammer lock,” which involved pulling McClain’s arm behind his back. Roedema later said he “cranked pretty hard” on McClain’s shoulder and heard it pop three times. In response to what they perceived as “excited delirium,” Cooper and Cichuniec, the paramedics, injected McClain with an overdose of the anesthetic ketamine.

By the end of this encounter, McClain had no pulse and had to be resuscitated in the ambulance with an injection of epinephrine. He never regained consciousness, and he was declared brain dead three days later. According to the indictment, McClain “suffered hypoxia, cerebral hypoxia, hypoxemia, metabolic acidosis, aspiration, [and] respiratory arrest.” The Adams County Coroner’s Office said the cause of McClain’s death was “undetermined” but added “it may be a homicide if the actions of officers led to his death.” A forensic pathologist cited in the indictment concluded that McClain died due to complications from his violent treatment and the ketamine. He said the manner of death was homicide.

Now let’s go back to the beginning of the encounter. What grounds did Woodyard and the other officers have for stopping McClain, let alone violently subduing him?

Despite the warm weather, McClain was wearing sweat pants, a jacket, a knit cap, and a ski mask, reportedly because he had anemia, one symptom of which is cold extremities. The 911 caller thought the ski mask was suspicious. He also reported that McClain was making “all these kinds of signs” with his hands. The caller added that “he might be a good person or a bad person.” He said no one was in danger and he had not seen any weapons.

In a report issued last February, an independent panel of legal, law enforcement, and medical experts concluded that none of this amounted to “reasonable suspicion” of criminal activity, the standard for an involuntary street stop. “Officer Woodyard’s decision to turn what may have been a consensual encounter with Mr. McClain into an investigatory stop—in fewer than ten seconds—did not appear to be supported by any officer’s reasonable suspicion that Mr. McClain was engaged in criminal activity,” the report said. “This decision had ramifications for the rest of the encounter.”

After grabbing McClain, Woodyard decided to frisk him, a step that is legally justified only if police reasonably suspect the subject is armed. Yet the 911 caller had not reported any weapons (a point that was noted in the police dispatcher’s message), McClain was plainly holding nothing but his phone and the plastic bag from the convenience store, and Woodyard himself later said he “felt safe making an approach” because McClain “didn’t have any weapons.” The panel’s report said “we were not able to identify sufficient evidence that Mr. McClain was armed and dangerous in order to justify a pat-down search.”

The panel said the decision to tackle and pin McClain “likewise cannot be justified by the record.” At this point, Woodyard’s unjustified investigatory stop became an arrest, which is constitutionally permissible only when police have probable cause to believe someone has committed a crime. That is a higher standard than reasonable suspicion, a test the cops had already failed to meet. “Since Officer Woodyard’s order to him to stop, the only facts that had changed were Mr. McClain’s attempt and stated intention to keep walking in the direction he had been going and his ‘tensing up,'” the report said. “In the Panel’s view, none of these facts would be sufficient to establish probable cause of a crime.”

While the officers were manhandling McClain, Roedema exclaimed, “He grabbed your gun, dude.” That statement, Woodyard claimed, “changed the situation.” Roedema later said he was referring to Rosenblatt’s gun. But according to the indictment, Rosenblatt “stated that he did not feel any contact with his service weapon.”

In any case, the independent panel noted, “Once he was lying on the ground, Mr. McClain’s ability to reach an officer’s gun or other weapons was limited by the fact that Officer Woodyard was on the ground behind him, with his gun and pepper spray pinned beneath him.” If McClain “was no longer presenting a threat of harm to the officers, there would have been no justification for Officer Woodyard to apply a carotid hold.” The body camera footage is unclear at this point, because the cameras were dislodged during the struggle. But the available record “does not provide evidence of the officers’ perception of a threat that would justify Officer Woodyard’s carotid hold, which caused Mr. McClain to either partially or fully lose consciousness.”

A carotid hold involves pressing on the sides of the neck to induce temporary unconsciousness by cutting off blood flow to the brain. Woodyard’s use of a carotid hold followed Rosenblatt’s unsuccessful attempt at the same maneuver. “The risk of hypoxia and cerebral hypoxia was exacerbated by applying two carotid control holds,” the indictment says. The three officers “had all been trained that the carotid hold posed dangers and should never be administered more than once.”

The indictment notes that McClain “vomited multiple times while being restrained.” Some of that vomit was found inside his ski mask, which he could not remove while he was restrained but “ultimately came off” after he was handcuffed. “Gurgling sounds by Mr. McClain were audible in body-worn camera video footage,” which was “evidence of potential aspiration.” McClain’s breathing “further indicated he had hypoxia following the police restraint and use of the carotid control hold.”

McClain was 5 feet, 7 inches tall and weighed 143 pounds. But the officers, who said McClain’s strength was “crazy” and “incredible” because of “whatever he’s on,” claimed their violence was justified because he resisted their unlawful attack on him. Providing further evidence of how everyone at the scene exaggerated the threat posed by McClain, Cooper gave him too much ketamine because he estimated that the short, slender man weighed 200 pounds, which was off by 57 pounds, or 40 percent.

After about two minutes on the scene, the indictment says, Cooper and Cichuniec “both concluded that Mr. McClain was suffering from excited delirium.” As three medical experts note in a 2020 Brookings Institution article, “law enforcement officers nationwide are routinely taught that ‘excited delirium’ is a condition characterized by the abrupt onset of aggression and distress, typically in the setting of illicit substance use, often culminating in sudden death.” But “this ‘diagnosis’ is not recognized by the vast majority of medical professionals. In fact, ‘excited delirium’ is not recognized by the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, or the World Health Organization.”

The indictment says Cooper and Cichuniec reached their conclusion about McClain’s condition “after receiving some information from officers and observing Mr. McClain for about one minute.” The cops were convinced that McClain was “definitely on
something,” and they repeatedly grilled him about what drugs he had taken. “Weed,” he said, but they did not believe him. Toxicology tests later found nothing psychoactive in McClain’s blood except for THC and the ketamine.

The indictment notes that neither paramedic “ascertained Mr. McClain’s vital signs, nor did either of them talk to or physically touch Mr. McClain before diagnosing him with excited delirium.” Based on body camera footage, “an emergency room physician with expertise in paramedic protocols concluded that excited delirium was an inaccurate diagnosis born of the paramedics’ failure to adequately assess Mr. McClain’s symptoms, and further concluded that ketamine should never have been administered.”

No one at the scene questioned that decision. “Yep, sounds good,” Rosenblatt said when Cooper announced that he planned to inject McClain with ketamine. “Perfect, dude, perfect,” Roedema agreed.

Piling error upon error, Cooper administered 500 milligrams of ketamine. Even if McClain actually weighed 200 pounds, that was too high a dose. “At that weight,” the indictment says, “in accordance with the standing order from [the paramedics’] medical director, Mr. McClain should have been administered 453 mg of Ketamine.” The correct dose for a 143-pound man would have been 325 milligrams, so McClain was given 175 milligrams too much, or 54 percent more than he should have received, even assuming that an involuntary ketamine injection was appropriate to begin with. The indictment notes that “the paramedics did not ask Mr. McClain how much he weighed.”

The cascade of legal, tactical, and medical errors that led to McClain’s death is especially appalling because all he wanted to do was go home, as he had every right to do. “Let me go,” he told Woodyard after the officer grabbed him. “I am an introvert! Please respect the boundaries that I am speaking. Stop. Stop! I’m going home!” The cops responded to McClain’s perfectly understandable objections by telling him to “relax,” “stop tensing up,” and “please cooperate.” To which McClain replied: “No. Can you leave me alone?” For reasons only they can fully understand, they could not.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3mX9M89
via IFTTT

US Auto Sales Crash As Dealer Inventory Hits New Record Low

US Auto Sales Crash As Dealer Inventory Hits New Record Low

US light vehicle sales tumbled in August, sliding to just 13.1 million (SAAR) per both Wards and Motor Intelligence, down in the mid-teens percent range from about 15.3 million in August 2020 and down sharply from the July SAAR of about 14.6 million. As last month, the collapse in sales was widely attributed to the ongoing collapse in auto inventory levels.

Some more details from Goldman:

  • Car sales were down about 18% yoy, SUV sales were down about 15% yoy, and pickup truck sales were down about 24% yoy. Pickups and SUVs as a percent of total units were 19% and 53%, respectively (vs. 20% and 51% in August 2020).

  • Per Motor Intelligence, Ford sales were down about 33% yoy and GM sales were down about 39% yoy in August. Ford’s market share in August declined yoy to 11% from 14%, and GM’s market share declined yoy to 12% from 17%. We believe that Ford and GM have faced more difficult supply chain challenges than some of their competitors YTD.

But while legacy auto sales tumbled, EVs and hybrids continued their recent ascent, and in August EV sales were up about 39% yoy, and hybrid sales were up about 63% yoy, per Motor Intelligence. In part this was due in part to growing consumer demand for EVs and hybrids, in addition to more EV/HEV models on the market. It is worth noting that Tesla does not report monthly sales, and given its dominant EV market share in the US, the EV data has a greater degree of estimation than the other monthly datapoints.

Next, looking at incentives, it is hardly a surprise that with cars flying off the lots,there were barely any. According to Motor Intelligence, August’s industry incentive spending per vehicle was down about 40% yoy and down about 4% sequentially to about $2.4k per vehicle. Goldman expects industry pricing to remain strong as components shortages continue to weigh on production in the short term, and dealer inventory remains low.

Finally, the elephant in the room remains the inventory level at dealer lots, or rather lack thereof: Inventory at US dealers, already all time low, declined even more and sank sequentially to below 1.0 mn from just above 1.0 mn in July 2021, and down from 2.5 mn in August 2020. Industry DOI came in at 23 days compared to 22 days in July 2021 and 50 days in August 2020. Pickup truck DOI was 32 days (vs. 31 in July 2021 and 50 in August 2020), SUV DOI was 21 days (vs. 20 in July 2021 and 48 in August 2020), and car DOI was 18 days (vs. 19 in July 2021 and 52 in August 2020).

Inventories at dealers continued to fall from already historically low levels, and according to Goldman, it will take time for inventory at dealers to return to normalized levels given the strong demand for vehicles coupled with ongoing supply chain challenges (particularly with semiconductor chip shortages, but also due to shipping constraints).

What are the implications? According to Goldman’s auto analyst, “August sales results were well below our preview” as historically low inventory levels (below 1MM units vs. historically in the 3-4MM range) continued to weigh on industry sales but by more than even Goldman had expected. Goldman concludes that the August sales level, coupled with the reduced volumes in recent months and very low inventory, implies downside risk to its full-year CY21 SAAR view, driven by very limited supply “given that inventory declined by about ~50K units mom despite the weaker sales level.”

Tyler Durden
Thu, 09/02/2021 – 15:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3kUMjCa Tyler Durden

China Declares a Culture War on Androgyny


shanghaipride_1161x653

China’s latest round of authoritarian fearmongering isn’t just targeting gamers. The government is going after celebrity culture and in particular young men they deem to be too effeminate.

The Associated Press reports:

China’s government banned effeminate men on TV and told broadcasters Thursday to promote “revolutionary culture,” broadening a campaign to tighten control over business and society and enforce official morality.

Broadcasters must “resolutely put an end to sissy men and other abnormal esthetics,” the TV regulator said, using an insulting slang term for effeminate men—”niang pao,” or literally, “girlie guns.”

The Wall Street Journal notes that this, like the video game restrictions, is part of cultural obsession with the masculine aesthetics that is common under authoritarian regimes, from the Soviet left to the fascist right. This often involves attempts purge anything that doesn’t fit those narrow gender roles.

China has historically had a complicated relationship with gay and trans issues. LGBT folks have historically been prosecuted there as mentally ill undesirables, but the government eventually started to ease up. China decriminalized homosexuality in 1997, and in 2001 removed it from their official list of mental disorders.

Subsequent polling shows that Chinese citizens, like their counterparts across much of the world, were becoming more and more comfortable with LGBT folks. Soon Shanghai was having gay pride marches and officially recognized gay bars.

But as Brian Wong recently reported in SupChina, the past five years have seen a backlash. The pride march has been canceled (though most were last year, due to COVID). Movies with LGBT gay themes are often censored or outright banned. Shanghai University is making a list of students who publicly identify as LGBT, and activists aren’t sure why. Earlier in July, the government ordered the Tencent-owned messaging app WeChat to delete accounts connected to LGBT groups.

China’s leadership certainly seems to be setting up LGBT folks and “non-masculine” men as social scapegoats. These moves may also be an indication that the younger generation is not on board with the Chinese government’s goals, and that leaders are struggling to rein them in. Working-age adults are starting to rebel against the heavy workloads being demanded to maintain a population that is growing older. A cultural movement called “lying flat” has developed, where young adults are rejecting long work schedules and living simpler lives in defiance of the ruling party’s pressures.

In that context, these new commandments seem to blames video games, entertainment, and androgyny for making men “soft” when a lot of them are just burned out. Pointing a finger at China’s version of Drag Queen Story Hour is a dodge—a way to redirect attention away from a top-heavy and corrupt regime that is far from the socialist fantasy where the government provides for its citizens.

If you want to grasp what’s really behind this suddenly blaming of video games and androgyny in China, read this piece in The Christian Science Monitor that describes what these “lying flat” workers are actually feeling:

Official data show China’s economic output per person doubled over the past decade, but many complain the gains went mostly to a handful of tycoons and state-owned companies. Professionals say their incomes are failing to keep up with soaring housing, child care, and other costs….

Thousands vented frustration online after the Communist Party’s announcement in May that official birth limits would be eased to allow all couples to have three children instead of two. The party has enforced birth restrictions since 1980 to restrain population growth but worries China, with economic output per person still below the global average, needs more young workers.

Minutes after the announcement, websites were flooded with complaints that the move did nothing to help parents cope with child care costs, long work hours, cramped housing, job discrimination against mothers, and a need to look after elderly parents.

If China’s response to these frustrations seems tone-deaf, remember: This is a country that tried to ban all representations of Winnie the Pooh to protect President Xi Jinping’s ego, just because people had been mocking him by saying he looked like the bear. Is it really young people who are “soft” and “weak” here?

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3teqSiX
via IFTTT

China Declares a Culture War on Androgyny


shanghaipride_1161x653

China’s latest round of authoritarian fearmongering isn’t just targeting gamers. The government is going after celebrity culture and in particular young men they deem to be too effeminate.

The Associated Press reports:

China’s government banned effeminate men on TV and told broadcasters Thursday to promote “revolutionary culture,” broadening a campaign to tighten control over business and society and enforce official morality.

Broadcasters must “resolutely put an end to sissy men and other abnormal esthetics,” the TV regulator said, using an insulting slang term for effeminate men—”niang pao,” or literally, “girlie guns.”

The Wall Street Journal notes that this, like the video game restrictions, is part of cultural obsession with the masculine aesthetics that is common under authoritarian regimes, from the Soviet left to the fascist right. This often involves attempts purge anything that doesn’t fit those narrow gender roles.

China has historically had a complicated relationship with gay and trans issues. LGBT folks have historically been prosecuted there as mentally ill undesirables, but the government eventually started to ease up. China decriminalized homosexuality in 1997, and in 2001 removed it from their official list of mental disorders.

Subsequent polling shows that Chinese citizens, like their counterparts across much of the world, were becoming more and more comfortable with LGBT folks. Soon Shanghai was having gay pride marches and officially recognized gay bars.

But as Brian Wong recently reported in SupChina, the past five years have seen a backlash. The pride march has been canceled (though most were last year, due to COVID). Movies with LGBT gay themes are often censored or outright banned. Shanghai University is making a list of students who publicly identify as LGBT, and activists aren’t sure why. Earlier in July, the government ordered the Tencent-owned messaging app WeChat to delete accounts connected to LGBT groups.

China’s leadership certainly seems to be setting up LGBT folks and “non-masculine” men as social scapegoats. These moves may also be an indication that the younger generation is not on board with the Chinese government’s goals, and that leaders are struggling to rein them in. Working-age adults are starting to rebel against the heavy workloads being demanded to maintain a population that is growing older. A cultural movement called “lying flat” has developed, where young adults are rejecting long work schedules and living simpler lives in defiance of the ruling party’s pressures.

In that context, these new commandments seem to blames video games, entertainment, and androgyny for making men “soft” when a lot of them are just burned out. Pointing a finger at China’s version of Drag Queen Story Hour is a dodge—a way to redirect attention away from a top-heavy and corrupt regime that is far from the socialist fantasy where the government provides for its citizens.

If you want to grasp what’s really behind this suddenly blaming of video games and androgyny in China, read this piece in The Christian Science Monitor that describes what these “lying flat” workers are actually feeling:

Official data show China’s economic output per person doubled over the past decade, but many complain the gains went mostly to a handful of tycoons and state-owned companies. Professionals say their incomes are failing to keep up with soaring housing, child care, and other costs….

Thousands vented frustration online after the Communist Party’s announcement in May that official birth limits would be eased to allow all couples to have three children instead of two. The party has enforced birth restrictions since 1980 to restrain population growth but worries China, with economic output per person still below the global average, needs more young workers.

Minutes after the announcement, websites were flooded with complaints that the move did nothing to help parents cope with child care costs, long work hours, cramped housing, job discrimination against mothers, and a need to look after elderly parents.

If China’s response to these frustrations seems tone-deaf, remember: This is a country that tried to ban all representations of Winnie the Pooh to protect President Xi Jinping’s ego, just because people had been mocking him by saying he looked like the bear. Is it really young people who are “soft” and “weak” here?

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3teqSiX
via IFTTT

Larry Forecasted To Become ‘Major Hurricane’ This Weekend

Larry Forecasted To Become ‘Major Hurricane’ This Weekend

Tens of millions of Americans woke up on the US East Coast Thursday to the aftermath of destruction left behind by remnants of Hurricane Ida. Now meteorologists are turning their attention to a hurricane in the Atlantic Basin that could be upgraded to a major hurricane (Category 3 or stronger) by this weekend. 

According to the National Hurricane Center (NHC), hurricane larry is packing 80 mph winds and strengthening as it travels west at 17 mph. The eye of the storm is about 660 miles west of the southernmost Cabo Verde Islands. 

NHC’s cone of uncertainty is tracking near Bermuda early next week. It’s still too early for the weather agency to project any further than next Tuesday, and landfall impacts are unknown at the moment. But as we move into the weekend, computer models will have a better idea of where the storm is headed next. 

If the storm tracks towards the East Coast and or the Northeast, it would be absolutely devastating for some areas that were terrorized by remnants of Hurricane Ida on Wednesday night. 

Statistically speaking, we should remind readers that the most active part of the Atlantic hurricane season is already underway, as the tropics are awakening. The peak of the season is Sept. 15. 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration forecasters recently bumped up their forecast to 21 named storms this season. 

Tyler Durden
Thu, 09/02/2021 – 15:22

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3gX38uG Tyler Durden

The Options ‘Tail’ Will Continue To Wag The Stock Market’s ‘Dog’… Until Mid-September

The Options ‘Tail’ Will Continue To Wag The Stock Market’s ‘Dog’… Until Mid-September

From “gamma hammers” to “gamma unclenching”, the cycles of pump, dump, and BTFD has been unrelenting this year, with the pattern around options expirations becoming more and more pronounced since May…

Nomura’s Charlie McElligott notes that the (options market) “tail” continues to wag the (cash equities market) “dog,” crunched by “yield enhancement” / “income generating” overwriting flows (that even The FT is starting to pay attention to).

The surge into these ‘overwriting’ funds…

…has stuffed dealers to the gills with gamma and delta exposures at extreme levels…

For some context on what this means, the Nomura strategist explains:

The cumulative flows from the “Gamma Hammer” strangle-seller alone (2 clips a day, ~3x’s a week in approximately 2-3 week expiration 20d strangles) has Dealers long ~$3B in Gamma (and at a cost of nearly ~5.0mm / day in decay) – which means that for a generic 100bps selloff, desks would in theory be in the mkt buying ~$2.5B of futures – which in-turn prevents any nascent selloff from developing thanks to said “insulation”

But, McElligott’s focus is on the mid-September period as the point where US Equities may locally “peak”:

as the now well-publicized Op-Ex cycle “volatility expansion” phenomenon (VIX 15th, index / ETFs 17th and set-up for another large “Gamma unclench” occurring while then too losing aforementioned Vanna- and Charm- supports into this large serial / qtrly expiration) coinciding with the “buyback blackout” kicking-off for US Financials in that 3rd week of September…and all ahead of the FOMC on the 22nd

Specifically, McElligott notes that The Fed timing here is particularly meaningful – not because the potential for an “official” announcement of “tapering” is some massive deal to markets (I believe we are well past that now) – but more because the potential for movement in the Committee’s economic projections and thus, the “dots,” which could cause some Rates upheaval after being firmly parked within their own range-trade hellscape for the past two months themselves (UST 10Y yields ~1.10-1.40).

And because of the potential for US Rates volatility around / after the 22nd Fed meeting as the market resets expectations on both the future path of hikes (off the new economic projections) and tapering, I think this “event risk” could then decrease the supply of “short vol” which has been conditioned to step-in the moment that volatility typically expands (i.e. around the Op-Ex cycle, which has finally gone “mainstream” and seemingly now trades like it too….see this past weekend’s write-up from Bloomberg “Options Turn Upheavals Into a Mid-Month Sure Thing for S&P 500”).

This could mean a longer period without the support that comes from said “short vol” flows reflexively swooping-in to save the day, which over the past decade + have acted to reset nascent spikes in volatility and stop the bleeding—IF this time we were to see those flows on hold due to the FOMC event risk a week later, their potential absence could allow for the “delta one” flow to hold more sway than usual of late (all that EPIC $Delta from index / ETF options as a source of de-risking flow, as well as Vol Control strategy de-allocation supply into an rVol move higher off of such an absolutely low base).

Tyler Durden
Thu, 09/02/2021 – 15:01

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3yCMXbZ Tyler Durden

“What Is Written with the Quill Can’t Be Cut Out with an Axe”

Two Russian sayings I was reminded of; in the original they are “Что написано пером, не вырубишь топором” (that one rhymes) and “Слово не воробей, вылетит—не поймаешь.”

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3yJM4OR
via IFTTT

“Hit The Pause Button”: Manchin Throws Democrats’ $3.5 Trillion Plan Into Disarray

“Hit The Pause Button”: Manchin Throws Democrats’ $3.5 Trillion Plan Into Disarray

Moderate Democratic Senator Joe Manchin (WV) has called on fellow Democrats to “hit the pause button” on their $3.5 trillion economic blueprint, throwing the tax-and-spending plan into disarray

According to Bloomberg, Manchin said this week that “runaway inflation” and uncertainty over Afghanistan-fueled national security risks warrants a ‘go-slow’ approach and a possible rethinking of the plan.

“Hit the pause button,” he said during a West Virginia Chamber of Commerce event held Wednesday. “Let’s sit back. Let’s see what happens. We have so much on our plate. We really have an awful lot. I think that would be the prudent, wise thing to do.”

Manchin’s comments come as Democratic leaders and committee chairs in the Senate and House are working out the specifics of the economic package, with a goal of moving it through Congress in the weeks after lawmakers return from an extended August recess. Manchin is a linchpin vote because Republicans are united in opposition. All members of the Senate Democratic caucus would have to back the measure in order for it to get the 51 votes needed to pass, with Vice President Kamala Harris providing the tie-breaking vote. 

The spending package also is facing obstacles in the House. Democrats can only afford three defections in that chamber if Republicans are united in opposition, and some moderate Democrats also are balking at the size of the package being drawn up. -Bloomberg

Manchin also called for the House to pass the $550 billion bipartisan infrastructure bill, which House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has insisted must be passed along with the $3.5 trillion plan. 

Tyler Durden
Thu, 09/02/2021 – 14:43

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2Vb8ZoN Tyler Durden

“What Is Written with the Quill Can’t Be Cut Out with an Axe”

Two Russian sayings I was reminded of; in the original they are “Что написано пером, не вырубишь топором” (that one rhymes) and “Слово не воробей, вылетит—не поймаешь.”

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3yJM4OR
via IFTTT

DHS, CNN Scramble To Flip Biden Afghanistan Narrative Back To Domestic ‘White Supremacists’ Threat

DHS, CNN Scramble To Flip Biden Afghanistan Narrative Back To Domestic ‘White Supremacists’ Threat

President Biden had a disastrous August. His poll numbers tumbled to their lowest point of his presidency, and much of that had to do with the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan. 

In a bid to recapture the narrative and distract the minds of Americans from the Afghan farce, the Biden administration and liberal media appear to be attempting to shift the focus to who they believe the real enemy is…

“White supremacist and anti-government extremists have expressed admiration for what the Taliban accomplished, a worrying development for US officials who have been grappling with the threat of domestic violent extremism,” CNN reported on Wednesday.

For weeks, Americans on both sides of the political spectrum were shocked by the images coming out of Kabul Airport, resembling the Fall of Saigon in 1975. 

Nearly 100 retired generals and admirals have demanded US Defense Secretary (and former Raytheon board member) Lloyd Austin and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley resign immediately over the botched Afghanistan withdrawal by the Biden administration. 

All of which has prompted the White House and liberal media to find a way to come together again to remind Americans that far-right groups are the real enemy. 

John Cohen of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis at the Department of Homeland Security was on a conference call last Friday with various law enforcement agencies and warned that white supremacists groups were “framing the activities of the Taliban as a success,” according to CNN, who reviewed a transcript of the call. 

Cohen warned about the “the great replacement concept” theory that white supremacists groups believe they’re losing control of the country as immigrants from other countries, including Afghanistan, come in by the thousands. 

“There are concerns that those narratives may incite violent activities directed at immigrant communities, certain faith communities, or even those who are relocated to the United States,” he added.

CNN continued to hype the far-right extremist threat by citing a story from SITE Intelligence Group, an NGO run by professional “extremist tracker” Rita Katz.

Katz’s warned that “far-right group” Proud Boys allegedly said:

“These farmers and minimally trained men fought to take back their nation back from globohomo. They took back their government, installed their national religion as law, and executed dissenters … If white men in the west had the same courage as the Taliban, we would not be ruled by Jews currently.” 

The story also quotes two unnamed federal officials.

Matt Taibbi summed up the farcical ‘sourcing’ here very succinctly:

What the liberal media is doing is clear. They’re shielding Biden from the withdrawal debacle while attempting to change the narrative because presidential polling data is slumping ahead of the midterms. The goal is to refocus the masses once again on domestic white terrorists at home, which as a reminder are “the greatest threat to democracy” according to the Biden admin. 

The transparency of this move by the administration and its key allies is evident for all to see.

Is it any wonder, trust in the media is in the toilet?

    Tyler Durden
    Thu, 09/02/2021 – 14:20

    via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3DFeOw7 Tyler Durden