Robert Gates Says UK Military Cuts Could Harm Its Ability To Be "Full Partner"

Former U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates

has said that cuts to the British military will mean that,
“With the fairly substantial reductions in defence spending in
Great Britain, what we’re finding is that it won’t have full
spectrum capabilities and the ability to be a full partner as they
have been in the past.”

Prime Minister
David Cameron responded to Gates’ comments saying “We are a
first-class player in terms of defence and as long as I am Prime
Minster that is the way it will stay.”

According to the BBC, the British
government is planning to cut “30,000 armed forces personnel by
2020, leaving 147,000.”

It is worth considering the size of the U.K.’s military given
its size.

The U.K. is smaller than Wyoming and has a population roughly
one fifth that of the U.S. Despite its small size, the U.K. is the
fourth largest
military spender in the world.

Of course, the British have fought with the U.S. in a number of
military conflicts, most recently in Iraq and Afghanistan. Given
how those conflicts worked out, perhaps it would be better for the
U.K. not “to be a full partner” with the U.S. in future
conflicts.

The British military will be able to defend the U.K. and its
territories (which is what it should be used for) even if the
planned reductions are accounted for. See graphic on the planned
reductions from the BBC below:

Even with a drop in the number of military personnel planned, it
is worth remembering that the U.K. is one of the world’s few
nuclear powers. The U.K.’s military, even post reductions,
will be more than capable of deterring attack. That is what British
policy makers should be concerned about, not the British military’s
ability to be a “full partner” in future U.S.-led foreign
adventures.