One-Chart Update Of Global Manufacturing

Following today’s crash in the US Manufacturing ISM, we now have the following snapshot of global manufacturing: only three countries are currently in contraction (sub 50 PMI) mode: Australia, Russia and France. Look for many more to join them if today’s US print is a harbinger of things to come to the global manufacturing space.

We already commented on the US manufacturing tracker. Here is Bank of America discussing the rest of the world.

On the first workday of a new month, global PMI manufacturing surveys are released around the world. That gives us an early read on the state of manufacturing. As the nearby table shows, out of the 22 countries that have reported so far, 13 reported improvements in their manufacturing sectors in January, while 8 recorded a weakening in their manufacturing sector and 1 was unchanged. A reading above 50 reflects expansion while below 50 indicates contraction. In this regard, there were only 3 countries in negative territory and 19 in positive. Of particular mention, Greece shifted from contraction to expansion.

Yeah, that Greek print: fade it, because the country which so many expect to enter a Grecovery in 2014, may already be in Grecession: “In contrast to expectations of a 0.6 percent recovery after six years of recession, the Greek economy may in fact not grow this year and could even post a small contraction, the Foundation for Economic and Industrial Research (IOBE) claims in its latest quarterly report that was made public on Thursday.”


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1kFcBSK Tyler Durden

A. Barton Hinkle Says Gay Marriage Is Loving v. Virginia All Over Again

Foes of gay marriage — a shrinking cohort — do
not like comparisons to interracial marriage. The reason is
obvious: Everyone now recognizes that prohibitions against
interracial marriage, which the Supreme Court struck down in the
aptly named Loving v. Virginia, were completely
irrational and thoroughly unjust. If the analogy with gay marriage
is valid, A. Barton Hinkle asserts, then that debate is over.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1k43YTO
via IFTTT

“Paranoid Libertarianism” Is Just As Mainstream As Modern Liberalism

The specter of “paranoid libertarianism” continues to haunt
American liberals. Hot on the heels of Sean Wilentz’s
recent fretting
in The New Republic that Edward
Snowden, Glenn Greenwald, and Julian Assange have undermined the
case for big government by drawing too much attention to various
instances of big government malfeasance, former Obama
administration official Cass Sunstein has now weighed in with his
own contribution to the genre, an op-ed titled “How
to Spot a Paranoid Libertarian
.”

According to Sunstein, paranoid libertarianism is characterized
by such pathologies as “a presumption of bad faith on the part of
government officials–a belief that their motivations must be
distrusted,” as well as “a belief that liberty, as paranoid
libertarians understand it, is the overriding if not the only
value, and that it is unreasonable and weak to see relevant
considerations on both sides.”

Sunstein tries very hard to make that sound like dangerous and
exotic stuff, but in fact what he’s really describing is mainstream
American jurisprudence when it comes to such vast areas of the law
as free speech, voting, abortion, privacy, and gay rights. In those
areas, our judicial system basically operates exactly as Sunstein
describes: it subjects government regulations to what lawyers call
strict (or intermediate) scrutiny. In essence, judges presume that
the government has acted illegitimately when it legislates in such
areas, and therefore forces the government to shoulder the burden
of proof and justify its actions with extremely convincing
rationales. Why do the courts place these government actions under
the microscope? To protect the people’s liberty to speak, vote,
associate, and enjoy various forms of privacy. One more thing:
American liberals overwhelmingly favor this approach in such
cases.

Here’s a recent example. During the March 2012 oral argument
over the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage
Act in United
States v. Windsor
, Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan
openly questioned the motives of each and every member of Congress
who voted in favor of that law. “We have a whole series of cases
which suggest the following,” Kagan told Republican lawyer Paul
Clement, who was arguing in favor of DOMA. “That when Congress
targets a group that is not everybody’s favorite group in the
world, that we look at those cases with some…some rigor to say,
do we really think that Congress was doing this for uniformity
reasons, or do we think that Congress’s judgment was infected by
dislike, by fear, by animus, and so forth?”

Is Elena Kagan a “paranoid libertarian?” Judging by Sunstein’s
definition, the answer is yes. Welcome to the brave new world.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1bVLEE9
via IFTTT

Banks Wary of Marijuana Money Say a New DOJ Memo Won't Be Enough to Make Them Comfortable

A couple of weeks ago, when Attorney General Eric
Holder said the Justice Department and the Treasury Department will
be issuing guidance “very soon” to banks wary of dealing with
state-licensed marijuana producers and distributors, I
wondered
whether it would be enough to make cautious financial
institutions comfortable with taking deposits from businesses that
federal law still treats as criminal enterprises. A recent
Politico article
suggests not:

Financial firms must comply with a slew of anti-money-laundering
rules enforced by bank regulators, and the risk of violations could
be big for banks that choose to do business with companies that are
breaking federal laws.

Also, the DOJ directive wouldn’t be binding, and there have been
past examples of prosecutors who disagree with similar guidance
ignoring the directive. The next administration could also wipe it
off the books. All it takes is one U.S. attorney to file criminal
charges, and a bank could lose its charter and be forced to shut
down.

With this in mind, for many banks—even with assurances from
Justice as well as Treasury’s anti-money-laundering division—the
risks still outweigh the rewards.

“From my conversations with bankers, I don’t see that there’s
anything they can do that’s going to give a bank the comfort they
need until Congress changes the law,” said Rob Rowe, senior counsel
at the American Bankers Association….

Don Childears, the president of the Colorado Bankers
Association, which has pushed hard for changes to the rules, said
he is not convinced that an opinion from the executive branch is
enough.

“It’s a murky area,” Childears said. “It literally will take an
act of Congress.”

One Colorado bank, Pueblo Bank & Trust, does not even allow
its ATMs to be placed in or near marijuana businesses, presumably
because it does not want customers to use cash from the machines to
buy cannabis. “Marijuana remains an illegal drug under federal
law,” PB&T President Mike Seppala told
The Pueblo Chieftain last week, “and that’s the bank’s
policy.”

Because growing and selling marijuana remain federal felonies,
providing financial services to businesses engaged in those
activities can be viewed as money laundering or aiding and abetting
drug trafficking. Holder can announce that such prosecutions should
not be a high priority for U.S. attorneys, but they won’t
necessarily listen, and the policy can be changed at any moment, by
this administration or the next. Without new federal legislation,
banks accepting marijuana money will always be taking a legal
risk.

The Respect State
Marijuana Laws Act
, introduced last spring by Rep. Dana
Rohrabacher (R-Calif.), would address the problem by declaring that
the provisions of the Controlled Substances Act dealing with
cannabis “shall not apply to any person acting in compliance
with state laws.”  The Marijuana
Businesses Access to Banking Act
, introduced last summer by
Reps. Ed Perlmutter (D-Colo.) and Denny Heck (D-Wash.), takes a
narrower approach, protecting banks that deal with state-legal
marijuana businesses from criminal investigation or prosecution and
from regulatory repercussions, including loss of federal deposit
insurance.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1k3ZDQu
via IFTTT

Banks Wary of Marijuana Money Say a New DOJ Memo Won’t Be Enough to Make Them Comfortable

A couple of weeks ago, when Attorney General Eric
Holder said the Justice Department and the Treasury Department will
be issuing guidance “very soon” to banks wary of dealing with
state-licensed marijuana producers and distributors, I
wondered
whether it would be enough to make cautious financial
institutions comfortable with taking deposits from businesses that
federal law still treats as criminal enterprises. A recent
Politico article
suggests not:

Financial firms must comply with a slew of anti-money-laundering
rules enforced by bank regulators, and the risk of violations could
be big for banks that choose to do business with companies that are
breaking federal laws.

Also, the DOJ directive wouldn’t be binding, and there have been
past examples of prosecutors who disagree with similar guidance
ignoring the directive. The next administration could also wipe it
off the books. All it takes is one U.S. attorney to file criminal
charges, and a bank could lose its charter and be forced to shut
down.

With this in mind, for many banks—even with assurances from
Justice as well as Treasury’s anti-money-laundering division—the
risks still outweigh the rewards.

“From my conversations with bankers, I don’t see that there’s
anything they can do that’s going to give a bank the comfort they
need until Congress changes the law,” said Rob Rowe, senior counsel
at the American Bankers Association….

Don Childears, the president of the Colorado Bankers
Association, which has pushed hard for changes to the rules, said
he is not convinced that an opinion from the executive branch is
enough.

“It’s a murky area,” Childears said. “It literally will take an
act of Congress.”

One Colorado bank, Pueblo Bank & Trust, does not even allow
its ATMs to be placed in or near marijuana businesses, presumably
because it does not want customers to use cash from the machines to
buy cannabis. “Marijuana remains an illegal drug under federal
law,” PB&T President Mike Seppala told
The Pueblo Chieftain last week, “and that’s the bank’s
policy.”

Because growing and selling marijuana remain federal felonies,
providing financial services to businesses engaged in those
activities can be viewed as money laundering or aiding and abetting
drug trafficking. Holder can announce that such prosecutions should
not be a high priority for U.S. attorneys, but they won’t
necessarily listen, and the policy can be changed at any moment, by
this administration or the next. Without new federal legislation,
banks accepting marijuana money will always be taking a legal
risk.

The Respect State
Marijuana Laws Act
, introduced last spring by Rep. Dana
Rohrabacher (R-Calif.), would address the problem by declaring that
the provisions of the Controlled Substances Act dealing with
cannabis “shall not apply to any person acting in compliance
with state laws.”  The Marijuana
Businesses Access to Banking Act
, introduced last summer by
Reps. Ed Perlmutter (D-Colo.) and Denny Heck (D-Wash.), takes a
narrower approach, protecting banks that deal with state-legal
marijuana businesses from criminal investigation or prosecution and
from regulatory repercussions, including loss of federal deposit
insurance.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1k3ZDQu
via IFTTT

The Money World Is Losing Faith In The Illusion Of Control

Submitted by Howard Kunstler via Kunstler.com,

The rot moves from the margins to the center, but the disease moves from the center to the margins. That is what has happened in the realm of money in recent weeks due to the sustained mispricing of the cost of credit by central banks, led by the US Federal Reserve. Along the way, that outfit has managed to misprice just about everything else  — stocks, houses, exotic securities, food commodities, precious metals, fine art. Oil is mispriced as well, on the low side, since oil production only gets more expensive and complex these days while it depends more on mispriced borrowed money. That situation will be corrected by scarcity, as oil companies discover that real capital is unavailable. And then the oil will become scarce. The “capital” circulating around the globe now is a squishy, gelatinous substance called “liquidity.” All it does is gum up markets. But eventually things do get unstuck.

Meanwhile, the rot of epic mispricing expresses itself in collapsing currencies and the economies they are supposed to represent: India, Turkey, Argentina, Hungary so far. Italy, Spain, and Greece would be in that club if they had currencies of their own. For now, they just do without driving their cars and burn furniture to stay warm this winter. Automobile use in Italy is back to 1970s levels of annual miles-driven. That’s quite a drop.

Before too long, the people will be out in the streets engaging with the riot police, as in Ukraine. This is long overdue, of course, and probably cannot be explained rationally since extreme changes in public sentiment are subject to murmurations, the same unseen forces that direct flocks of birds and schools of fish that all at once suddenly turn in a new direction without any detectable communication.

Who can otherwise explain the amazing placidity of the sore beset American public, beyond the standard trope about bread, circuses, and superbowls? Last night they were insulted with TV commercials hawking Maserati cars. Behold, you miserable nation of overfed SNAP card swipers, the fruits of wealth and celebrity! Savor your unworthiness while you await the imminent spectacles of the Sochi Olympics and Oscar Night! Things at the margins may yet interrupt the trance at the center. My guess is that true wickedness brews unseen in the hidden, unregulated markets of currency and interest rate swaps.

The big banks are so deep in this derivative ca-ca that eyeballs are turning brown in the upper level executive suites. Notable bankers are even jumping out of windows, hanging themselves in back rooms, and blowing their brains out in roadside ditches. Is it not strange that there are no reports on the contents of their suicide notes, if they troubled to leave one? (And is it not unlikely that they would all exit the scene without a word of explanation?) One of these, William Broeksmit, a risk manager for Deutsche Bank, was reportedly engaged in “unwinding positions” for that that outfit, which holds over $70 trillion in swap paper. For scale, compare that number with Germany’s gross domestic product of about $3.4 trillion and you could get a glimmer of the mischief in motion out there. Did poor Mr. Broeksmit despair of his task?

Physicist Stephen Hawking declared last week that black holes are not exactly what people thought they were. Stuff does leak back out of them. This will soon be proven in the unwinding derivatives trades when most of the putative wealth associated with swaps and such disappears across the event horizon of bad faith, and little dribbles of their prior existence leak back out in bankruptcy proceedings and political upheaval.

The event horizon of bad faith is the exact point where the credulous folk of this modern age, from high to low, discover that their central banks only pretend to be regulating agencies, that they ride a juggernaut of which nobody is really in control. The illusion of control has been the governing myth since the Lehman moment in 2008. We needed desperately to believe that the authorities had our backs. They don’t even have their own fronts.

Is the money world at that threshold right now? One thing seems clear: nobody is able to turn back the plummeting currencies. They go where they will and their failures must be infectious as the greater engine of world trade seizes up. Who will write the letters of credit that make international commerce possible? Who will trust whom? When do people seriously start to starve and reach for the pitchforks? When does the action move from Kiev to London, New York, Frankfurt, and Paris?


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1foLxUa Tyler Durden

Thousands Stuck in Obamacare Appeals Limbo

You may have heard that HealthCare.gov,
which powers the federally run health insurance exchange for 36
states, is, after its disastrous rollout last year, all fixed up
and working basically fine. Obamacare is on track. But that’s not
true, it seems, for anyone who wants to file an appeal regarding
insurance coverage obtained through the system.

Some 22,000 people have already filed appeals, saying that the
system made a mistake with their application. But those appeals
have gone nowhere, because the computer system meant to handle them
has not been built,
according to The Washington Post
, which obtained
access to internal government data on progress completing the
website. Telephone help doesn’t work either, because call center
employees can’t access the appeals system either. 

The Post had to rely on leaked government data and
anonymous insiders for its report because the Obama administration
never disclosed the exchange’s lack of appeals functionality. When
asked about the appeals mechanism, an administration spokesperson
responded with a weasely half-admission that, yes, the appeals
system isn’t finished, saying, “We are working to fully implement
the appeals system.” Progress! Always progress. Except that there’s
no indication that the administration is making any. Insiders tell
the Post that they have no idea when the system
will be complete.

If anything, the administration has worked to mislead people
about the status of the appeals functionality, setting up a system
that allowed someone to file an appeal that, after being sent off,
entered a sort of digital limbo.

The appeals system appears to be one of many components of
Obamacare’s technology that has not been built yet. At the end of
last year, a senior tech official for Medicare, which manages the
health exchange,
told members of Congress that 30-40 percent of the system had yet
to be completed
, including crucial payment systems. Those
payment systems, which include various money-shuffling
risk-mitigation schemes that the administration
says are critical
to keeping the whole law afloat, still
haven’t been completed. The administration recently fired its old
tech contractor brought on a new firm to complete the remaining
work.

Whatever else one thinks about the law and its design, it’s
clear that the administration, as well as
several state governments
attempting to build their own
exchanges, wasn’t even close to sufficiently prepared for launch
last October. This looks like a project that needed another year or
more before going live. Instead, the administration chose to beta
test a faulty, incomplete product on the public while papering over
their own administrative failures and incompetence.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1j6Jyth
via IFTTT

Yen Breaks 102 Focal Point

As we already noted earlier today in our overnight recap “Alarms Going Off As 102 Dollar-Yen Support Breached“, all eyes are glued on the USDJPY 102, which moments ago decisively breached the 102 support level. We said that “if support below the USDJPY fail solidly, then watch out below.” Sure enough, here is Ben Hunt from Epsilon Theory with some follow up observations on this topic.

There was a clear short-term narrative developed in the financial media last week creating a focal point at 102 in the Yen/USD exchange rate. The short-Yen trade is perhaps the most crowded trade in the world right now, so a strengthening of the Yen to break below the focal point is a big deal for market game-playing behavior. The Yen broke below 102 today, which will put plenty of game-playing pressure on levered short-Yen positions in particular, and the entire equity market in general. Be careful out there.

Untaper time yet?


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1bVvY3R Tyler Durden

Whose Fake Outrage Are We Faking Being Outraged About Today?

Not quite as boring as the game, but close.Last night, during the annual
televised Department of the Interior round-up and execution of wild
horses (which took place in New Jersey this year for some odd
reason), Coca-Cola premiered a new commercial that included: 1)
part of “America the Beautiful” being sung in a language other than
English; and 2) a family with two dads.

People being outraged about everything under the sun has been a
theme on Twitter for a while. Media outlets hunting down the
outrage and publicizing it as a relatively cheap way to score hits
from people who like to be outraged about the outrage of other
people followed not long after. For the Coca-Cola commercial,
reaction tweets were posted at
USA Today
,
E! Online
, the
Daily Mail
,
Talking Points Memo
,
Mediaite
, and likely others.

In each case, a handful of tweets are intended to serve as
evidence as some sort of widespread attitude among a certain
demographic, which will then subsequently be used to judge a much
larger group of people. Thus, we had the infamous
MSNBC Cheerios tweet
that assumed right-wingers would hate an
advertisement that featured a biracial family.

But is there any substantive evidence that this outrage actually
existed to a degree large enough to justify multiple media reports?
It certainly doesn’t seem like it, but man, aren’t those easy
stories to put together? Toss a few search terms on Twitter and you
can find all sorts of opinions! Reporters can put together “man on
the street” stories without ever even leaving their desks or
actually interacting with any other human beings at all!

“Man on the Street” pieces were never all that interesting or
useful to begin with, but at least it involved an actual person in
an actual place who chose to share his or her opinions to a
reporter for our evaluation. This nearly contextless sharing of
random angry tweets illuminates even less. But it’s good for
stirring up a round of counteroutrage, isn’t it? And that
counteroutrage at some anonymous, undefined number of people
behaving badly on the Internet makes some others feel more
superior, doesn’t it?

Below, the ad:

I am outraged by how utterly pedestrian it is. This could have
been a Levi’s ad five years ago. It could be advertising
anything.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1fBnZ0u
via IFTTT

Dow Down 1000 Points From Highs, Nikkei Nuked

It’s not just Japanese stocks that are in trouble. The Dow Industrials futures just lost 15,500 – the lowest level since the debt-ceiling lows mid-November and down over 1000 points from 2013’s closing highs. The terrible ISM print triggerd wholesale buying in bonds and bullion and selling of stocks and the USD.

 

 

The Nikkei is getting nuked and now trades over 2,000 points from its highs and over 1100 points “cheap” to the Dow…

 

Bonds are well bid… as is bullion…

 

Charts: Bloomberg


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1cNlOqj Tyler Durden