Fed Releases Taper’d POMO Schedule – Allows 3 Days For Shorting In April

As expected, the Federal Reserve has released its Permanent Open Market Operations (POMO) non-monetizing-of-the-debt schedule for April with $30 billion of Treasury purchases (and $25 billion MBS). This is a 33% reduction from the ‘normal’ $45 billion Treasury purchase of last year. The POMO schedule very generously allows traders 3 days of non-money-printing potential shorting opportunities (Friday 4th, Thursday 17th, and Wednesday 30th)… however, this Friday is non-farm payrolls day and we will not be allowed a red day after that…

 

 

Source: The Fed


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1gUI9VX Tyler Durden

Massachusetts Tackles an ‘Epidemic of Opiate Abuse’ by Banning One Version of Hydrocodone

Last week Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick
imposed an
emergency ban
on Zohydro, an extended-release version of the
narcotic painkiller hydrocodone that was approved by the Food and
Drug Administration last year. Patrick
said
 Zohydro “poses a significant risk to individuals
already addicted to opiates and to the public at large.” Zohydro’s
manufacturer, Zogenix,
complains
that the “unprecedented” state ban on a specific
FDA-approved product “only serves to unfairly restrict patient
access to the only hydrocodone pain reliever available for
long-term, daily, severe chronic pain patients who are obtaining
relief with short-acting hydrocodone combination products, but who
are at risk for potentially fatal liver toxicity due to their daily
intake of acetaminophen.” As Reuters
explains
, Zohydro’s detractors view the absence of that risk as
a dangerous drawback:

The company has defended the drug as a necessary option for pain
patients who cannot tolerate acetaminophen, a nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drug linked to liver damage and stomach
bleeding.

But critics worry that with no built-in abuse deterrents,
Zohydro will be a draw for addicts looking for an easy fix.

You might have thought that hydrocodone products such as Vicodin
and Lortab contain acetaminophen with the goal of achieving a
synergistic analgesic effect that reduces the amount of hydrocodone
required for a given level of pain. But in truth the acetaminophen
functions more like the methanol that the government required
manufacturers to put in industrial alcohol during Prohibition: as a
poison aimed at deterring abuse. In the case of acetominophen,
there is no direct mandate, but “combination products”
traditionally have been less restricted than straight hydrocodone,
placed on Schedule III rather than Schedule II of the Controlled
Substances Act because they were deemed to have a lower potential
for abuse. Now that the FDA wants to
eliminate
that distinction, there is not much advantage to
mixing hydrocodone with acetaminophen, especially for patients with
severe chronic pain who take the pills every day for an extended
period of time. But Patrick is basically telling Zogenix that it
cannot sell Zohydro to those patients unless it agrees to slowly
poison them with acetaminophen or comes up with a tamper-resistant
formulation that is harder to crush for snorting or
injecting. 

Zogenix argues that its product has become a scapegoat for what
Patrick calls “an epidemic of opiate abuse”:

Contrary to some recent media reports, most other opioid
medications on the market today are [either] equal to or more
potent than Zohydro ER (e.g., oxycodone, fentanyl, hydromorphone
and oxymorphone), and all are available in higher strengths per
unit-of-use than Zohydro ER. Claims that Zohydro ER is “more
powerful” or “more addictive” than other commonly prescribed
opioids are not supported by scientific data.

Over the last 12 months, more than 360,000 prescriptions for
extended-release opioids were dispensed in Massachusetts, and
a significant majority did not have FDA-approved abuse
deterrent claims. We fail to see how banning the sale of a single
new product will achieve the governor’s policy objectives when all
of the products that are currently part of the epidemic remain
available for sale in the state….The [Drug Enforcement
Administration] quota for Zohydro ER is less than one percent of
the total allotted hydrocodone product that will be manufactured in
the U.S. this year.

Even if Zohydro were especially attractive to addicts, that
consideration should not override the needs of legitimate patients.
As usual with attempts to “balance
drug control and pain control, Patrick’s ban sacrifices the
interests of patients to protect addicts from themselves, a
tradeoff that is not morally justified.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1iT3JIS
via IFTTT

Flying Out of NYC, Gun Owners? Not So Fast. The Locals Want To Bust You and Steal Your Firearms.

Gun lock boxesThe tale of a 65-year-old engineer,
flying home to Alabama through LaGuardia Airport, and then dragged
off in handcuffs after following all of the Transportation
Security Administration’s extensive rules
for getting his .22
pistol from Point A to Point B, features in an Associated Press
story.

As it turns out, Mike Connolly was arrested simply because he
owned a firearm and was within the grasp of New York City
authorities. City officials used the opportunity to mug him and
steal his gun.

From
Jake Pearson at Associated Press
:

Mike Connolly thought he was doing everything by the book after
a vacation last fall when he packed his handgun for the flight home
from New York’s LaGuardia Airport.

Following Transportation Security Administration guidelines, the
65-year-old Alabama engineer locked his unloaded Ruger .22 in a
hard-sided container, put it in a checked bag, handed it to the
ticket agent and told the agent the weapon was inside.

That’s when he was slapped with handcuffs, arrested on a felony
weapons possession charge and hauled off to jail.

Such incidents—travelers passing through New York City with
locked, unloaded firearms and being arrested just
because
—are sufficiently common that at least one Queens
Attorney maintains a page on his website devoted to his expertise
in such matters. According to
Martin Kane
:

If you have been arrested for possession of a firearm or other
weapon at JFK or LaGuardia airports in Queens County, NY, you
probably share several traits with almost all of my airport gun
arrest clients:

1) You are a law-abiding citizen who is careful to follow the
law.

2) You recognize the responsibilities of gun ownership and are
careful to handle, store, and transport your handgun in the safest
way possible.

3) When you flew to New York, you carefully checked with both
your airline and the TSA as to whether it was legal to transport
your firearm in your luggage. You also learned and followed the
strict requirements such as unloading and segregating ammunition,
using a TSA approved lockbox, and submitting a TSA Declaration
form.

The Associated Press agrees, saying of the 25 travelers arrested
at New York City airports last year, “They were hardly nefarious
gun runners. Most were otherwise law-abiding gun-owners who
mistakenly thought they had appropriately packed their heat for
travel.”

For their troubles, if they don’t fight, the “offenders” get
their charges reduced to non-criminal violations with hundreds of
dollars in fines—and city officials steal their guns. That’s in
addition to the time the travelers spent in jail for trying to do
things by the rules.

If they fight, they face felony charges.

Why has New York City become such a trap for gun owners who are
trying to follow the rules to get out of the place? Writes Kane,
“The short answer is that New York has the toughest gun control
laws in the world and does not recognize the legitimacy of any out
of state licenses as conveying any rights in New York. To make
matters worse, our current mayor has made gun law enforcement a
signature issue and accordingly, the Queens District Attorney has
set up a separate bureau headed by a high ranking official just for
gun cases.”

Queens Executive District Attorney Robert J. Masters,
who sounds like quite the jerk, puts the blame on the arrestees.
“There is, frankly, an element of irresponsibility. They’ve
traveled. They realize that licenses are different around the
country.”

Remember, these travelers were trying to get out of New
York City, so there’s no pretense of keeping residents safe from
(**gasp**) unloaded, locked guns. So licenses may be “different,”
but this is just a game of gotcha.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1iT3JIM
via IFTTT

$242 Billion: That Is How Much Record “Window Dressing” Banks Got Today Thanks To The Fed

The last time banks scrambled to pad their books into the quarter end, and come begging at the front door of the NY Fed’s Liberty 33 office, was on the last day of Q4 and 2013, when nearly $200 billion in Treasurys were handed out by the Fed to over 100 counterparties in what was the largest reverse repo operation conducted by Ben Bernanke, and his brand new Fixed-Rate Reverse Repo operation, in history.

That was the record until today, when just over an hour ago the Fed disclosed that as part of its most recent reverse repo operation, it had handed out to 93 dealer banks and other financial intermediaries, both foreign and domestic, some $242 billion in Treasurys in what is now the biggest reverse repo operation in history, a privilege for which the collateral-starved banks paid the Fed the king’s ransom of 0.05% in annual interest, i.e., nothing.

So while hedge funds, speculators and assorted vacuum tubes are rushing all day to bid up all the overvalued stocks they can find in order to make their quarter end P&Ls appear more attractive to LPs even as the early ramp and late selloff is again set to resume tomorrow, the megabanks too were rushing to the “window dressed” safety of Treasurys in order to make their balance sheets appear more attractive to regulators and supervisors, in a world in which high quality collateral is much more valuable than the Fed’s fungible reserves, and which helps indicate much higher capitalization ratios than otherwise would be observed at the collateral-starved banks.

But what today’s off the charts reverse repo really shows us, aside from the fact that all the reverse repo operation really is, is a way for the Fed to make bank balance sheets appear far better than in reality (for all those still confused), is that the collateral shortage we have been warning about for the past several years, and which is getting only more acute the longer the Fed soaks up all 10 year equivalents from the Treasury market (of which it now holds 35% and rapidly rising), is getting worse for banks.

And in related news, one should consider that tomorrow – with their books well padded for the March 31 daily security “holdings” – the banks will almost certainly unwind over $100 billion if not more of today’s reverse repo, an amount that is now equal to nearly two full months of QE. Where that money will go, only the (NY) Fed and a few bank CEOs know.

Then again none of this should come as a surprise – we said precisely this during our last such window dressing observation, to wit:

In short: collateral window dressing on; collateral window dressing off, all with the blessing of the banks’ overarching regulator, the Federal Reserve. What is most disturbing is that both the world’s largest financial firms, and by implication the Fed, just admitted there is a massive collateral shortage currently if banks are forced to pad their books to the tune of nearly $200 billion in “high quality collateral” just to pass year-end auditor muster.

Today’s record quarterly window dressing merely confirmed precisely this.

So while the Fed can provide on both an orderly and on an emergency basis up to the total amount of Treasurys it holds on its entire balance sheet amounting to $2.3 trillion (as of today), what will happen if banks find themselves needing to urgently satisfy $2.4 trillion, or $2.5 trillion, or $5 trillion, or more in Treasury deliverable demands, as collateral chains suddenly collapse on themselves as they did the day after Lehman’s bankruptcy and rehypothecated Treasurys, not to mention re-re-re-rehypothecated Treasurys have to be delivered once those infamous “off the books” repo and reverse-repo operations suddenly find they aren’t quite netting each other off, as we have also been warning for years.

We hope not to have to find out, at least not for some time, because the outcome would make the Lehman aftermath seem like a walk in the park.


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1ghjWmI Tyler Durden

Mark Faber: The Old World Order Is Over

Via Callum Denness of Money Morning blog,

In the gilded ballroom of Hyatt’s Savoy ballroom, World War D‘s opening speaker Dr Mark Faber delivered a blunt message: the old world order is over.

The US reached a peak in prosperity and influence in the world in the 1950s or 1960s,’ said Faber. But since the 70s the superpower has been locked into a cycle of bubbles, busts and growing debt.

Debt, and the way it has manipulated the global economy, was the main theme of Faber’s address.

There are some people who claim to be economists who will tell you debts do not matter,’ Faber told the packed ballroom.

But the real story is different….

Faber explained the flaw at the heart of expansionary monetary policy (such as QE). ‘When you drop dollar bills into the economy…it won’t lift all prices and assets equally at the same time,’ he said. In the 60s and 70s, extra money flowing through the economy inflated wages; in the early 2000s, money printing inflated commodities. But, Faber points out, this price and asset growth is never equal.

In other words, money printing creates more bubbles. Some assets go up, they overshoot, collapse and cause significant damage which necessitates, in the view of the US Federal Reserve, more money printing. It is a vicious cycle we’ve seen since the 70s: each time there was an economic problem, the Fed printed money and created more distortions.

Bernanke’s tenure saw this trend continue, and when it came to assessing the former Fed chairman, Faber didn’t mince his words.

 ’He’s been a disaster,‘ Faber said drily. Faber pointed out that not only did Bernanke not notice the subprime disaster, he actually helped create it. ‘Under his tenure at the Federal Reserve and under his intellectual influence when working for Mr Greenspan they created the gigantic housing bubble,‘ he said.

At the heart of this expansion in debt, and cycle of bubbles and busts is the reliance of the US economy on consumption. For the last century, policy makers have encouraged consumption on all levels of society including government, and discouraged savings.

But according to Faber, consumption doesn’t create a strong economy. ‘Wealth doesn’t come from consumerism, it comes from capital spending,‘ he said.

And the problem for the US economy is that while debt has continued to rise, capital investment hasn’t. In fact, it’s been falling sharply for a long time.

If we have growing debts, there’s a difference in quality of those debts, he said.  Japan, South Korea and Taiwan used their debts to invest in factories, plants…investments that generated wealth. According to Faber however, the US has just acquired debt to fuel consumption. ‘Where’s the future income?‘ he asked.

Faber used this as an opportunity to strike a note of caution for Australia, warning the room that one day Australia’s indebted housing sector won’t be able to borrow much more. It will then enter a period of contraction or very slow growth.

That was his warning to Australia: then came the opportunity.

We live in a new word. We live in a world where the balance of power has shifted to emerging countries,’ said Faber.

He was of course, talking about China. While China’s growth story is well known, Faber gave the audience an important geopolitical sub story.

China’s massive growth triggered massive commodity export booms in emerging economies. China’s real success was exporting the products it produced back to emerging economies. This has created a significant shift in the global economy: exports from China to emerging countries are higher than exports to the US or Europe.

‘This is the new world, where the old world is largely bypassed,’ said Faber.  While most of the media debates whether the US will grow, Faber argues it will have no impact on the world, as China has a much greater influence now than the US.

Faber is no bull on China however, and warned he would be very careful about investing there. Faber sees conditions at the present time as much worse than many people realise. There are also geopolitical concerns that are often left unexamined.

Take oil. Oil consumption in China – most of which comes from the Middle East – will rise.The Middle East in my opinion will go up in flames at some point, that will be an unpleasant event, predicted Faber in his typically apocalyptic but still understated way.

For Australia, he sees opportunities in the huge numbers of Chinese tourists travelling abroad, but he believes Australia has made a huge mistake by tolerating US bases on its continent. China will not sit by and let themselves be bossed around by the US,‘ he said.

His final message reiterated the failure of the US Federal Reserve. Corporate profits had been boosted by artificially low interest rates; wealth inequality is on the rise; and to compound it all, he says the Fed won’t raise interest rates anytime soon.

Punctuated by flashes of humour and dire warnings, it was a sober message that the attentive audience lapped up.


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1jQQQCE Tyler Durden

Philly Artist Fights City Hall Over Eminent Domain Abuse

Artist James Dupree
bought a dilapidated warehouse in Philadelphia’s Mantua
neighborhood and worked to turn it into a studio that
hosts his personal workshop, art classes, and even
visitors through Airbnb.

But that’s all being threatened by the Philadelphia
Redevelopment Authority (PRA), a local government agency that is
supposed to revitalize distressed neighborhoods.

PRA made
plans
with Aquinas Realty Partners to convert the block that
Dupree’s studio is on into a multi-use area with retail shops and a
high-end grocery store.

Watch above or click on the link below for video, full text,
supporting links, downloadable versions, and more Reason TV
clips.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1hVnfRM
via IFTTT

Cop in Kelly Thomas Beating Death Wants Immunity from Federal Prosecution

Who wouldn't want these two around their kids?Homeless schizophrenic Kelly
Thomas, 37, was beaten to death by police in Fullerton, California,
in 2011. Two officers, Manuel Ramos and Jay Ciccinelli, were
charged in Thomas’ death, but were found not guilty by a jury in
January.

Thomas’ father, Ron, has filed a
wrongful death suit
against the Fullerton police for Thomas’
death, alleging assault and battery, negligence, and civil rights
violations.

But there’s a new problem. The federal government is
investigating the beating as well, and now Ramos is asking for
immunity from federal prosecution before being deposed in Ron
Thomas’ civil suit. From the
Los Angeles Times
:

Because of the potential for being prosecuted by the federal
government, Ramos filed a motion on March 20 asking for immunity
regarding any statements he made during the deposition about his
violent confrontation with Kelly.

If Ramos isn’t granted immunity, he likely will ask a judge to
limit the scope of questioning.

Ramos’ attorney said that subjecting Ramos to questioning about
what happened the night of Thomas’ death would essentially violate
the former officer’s 5th Amendment rights.

To sum up, Ramos doesn’t want anything he says in a civil trial
to be used against him in a possible federal trial because it would
be a roundabout way of getting around his right not to incriminate
himself. As loathsome as we may find Ramos, is it hard to disagree
with that logic?

Katherine Mangu-Ward noted recently that in the wake of the
acquittal, Ramos attempted a visit to
Denny’s
only to discover the community not very hospitable.
Ciccinelli has also been tracked down coaching
Little League
baseball.

Below: Reason TV’s report on the Thomas case and the power of
filming police abuse. Needless to say, the video was produced
before Ramos and Ciccinelli were found not guilty:

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1jQLgjM
via IFTTT

Who You Gonna Trust?

Given the pump-and-dump revelations of last night (that we have been vocierfously explaining to an unwilling to hear public for five years), the question today is – who you gonna trust? The bond market or the stock market…

 

Did Yellen really just go full dove-tard? If so why is the USD rallying and gold fading?

 

Of course what is really driving the Stock market is carry-fueled HFT momentum…

 

Charts: Bloomberg


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1jstQax Tyler Durden

Meanwhile At The Obamacare Website…

Despite months to plan and an early morning failure today already, the Obamacare wesbite Healthcare.gov is down once again…

  • *AP SAYS HEALTHCARE.GOV WEBSITE NOT ACCEPTING NEW APPLICANTS,
  • *TECHNICAL PROBLEMS PREVENTING HEALTHCARE.GOV APPLICATIONS: AP

Of course the frequency of visitors is having some effect and the adminstration has once again extended the deadline for enrolment as long as participants are in line today. Perhaps, Obama should ask the HFTs how they cope with the volume?

 

As Bloomberg reports, Healthcare.gov, the federal website for Obamacare, faltered for the second time today as a record number of people tried to buy health insurance on the last day of enrollment for 2014.

Starting about midday New York time, users weren’t able to create new applications because of the number of people trying to use the website. Visitors to the health insurance exchange are being directed to a queuing system that asks them to provide an e-mail address so they can be contacted when traffic slows.

 

"There are a record number of people trying to access healthcare.gov right now — more than 100,000 people concurrently in the system as of noon,” Aaron Albright, a spokesman for the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said in an e-mail. “The application and enrollment tools are unavailable to new users at the moment. The tech team is working to resolve the issue as quickly as possible. Users already in system remain able to complete enrollment.”

 

The agency pulled the website out of service earlier today after a software bug was discovered during the 1 a.m. to 5 a.m. regularly scheduled maintenance of the site.

We also remind those excited about a few hundred thousand enrollees on the last day that these are merely adding the healthcare to their 'Carts' and not actually paying for it yet… remember the average e-commerce shopping cart abandonment rate is 67%.


    

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1fH50Pp Tyler Durden

People Protest Police Brutality in New Mexico, Cops Tear Gas Them

Hundreds of people took to the
streets of Albuquerque, New Mexico, yesterday to protest police
brutality. The police responded by blocking the activists’ paths
and firing tear gas canisters at them.

The demonstration, which began in the early afternoon outside
the Albuquerque Police Department (APD) headquarters, came as a
response to the department’s frequent use of force.

“There has been excessive force lately—in the last couple of
years — and I think something has to be done,” one
participant told
a local news station. “The new police chief is not
doing his job. He spoke wrongly two weeks ago by justifying it,
before everything was out there.”

The Associated Press notes that
the APD has been involved in 37 shootings since 2010 and is
currently under federal investigation. In one recent incident,
officers shot
a homeless man
 for illegally camping on public
grounds.

By 5 p.m., an estimated 300 protesters were marching through the
streets and riot police armed with batons and wearing gas masks
(and some riding riot
gear-wearing horses
) arrived to disperse the crowds. The APD

declared
the gathering an “unlawful assembly,”
implying
that the protesters intended to use violence.

However, the Albuquerque Journal writes
that the situation didn’t become “unruly” until 8 p.m., after New
Mexico State Police arrived. The Journal reported at the
time:

A line of riot police have blocked about 200 protesters’ passage
west on Central Avenue near Girard, and protesters have thrown eggs
and water bottles at APD vehicles.

About 75 protesters are confronting police in front of the line
of officers, which includes those mounted on horses and empty
prisoner-transport vans.

[…]

“We want to ensure you have the right to protest in a lawful
manner,” police can be heard telling the protesters.

The nearby APD Monte Vista substation was also vandalized with
spray-painted expletives.

Soon after, the Bernalillo
County SWAT Team, operating armored vehicles, joined in and
officers arrested at least one protester.

After 9 p.m., Mayor Richard Berry warned that “individuals who
weren’t connected necessarily with the original protest [had] taken
it far beyond a normal protest,” when protesters reportedly injured
one officer and broke a patrol car window. So, law enforcement
began firing tear gas into crowds and according to Associated
Press, “Bernalillo County sheriff’s deputies charg[ed] at the
protesters.”

People regrouped two hours later, and the police fired more tear
gas at them. One attendee captured an
incident on camera.

State Sen. Joe Cervantes (D) wrote on Twitter that
“student housing [was] impacted” at the University of New Mexico
when “tear gas has drifted inside dorms”

The protests petered out late in the night.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1fH43Xk
via IFTTT