If Democrats Seek to “Rally Blacks” Against Police Militarization, They Might Start with the Congressional Black Caucus

The New
York Times
reports that, “At
Risk in Senate, Democrats Seek to Rally
Blacks.”
 Specifically, the Times says

Democrats are trying to mobilize African-Americans outraged by
the shooting in Ferguson, Mo., to help them retain control of at
least one chamber of Congress for President Obama’s final two years
in office….

“Ferguson has made it crystal clear to the African-American
community and others that we’ve got to go to the polls,” said
Representative John Lewis, Democrat of Georgia and a civil-rights
leader. “You participate and vote, and you can have some control
over what happens to your child and your country.”

Lewis might want to start with his colleagues in the
Congressional Black Caucus, many of whom were blase about police
militarization as recently as June. As
Ed Krayewski has noted
, in June, Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.)
sponsored an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act
(H.R. 4355) that would have prevented federal giveaways of military
equipment to local police departments around the country. “My
amendment,” explained Grayson, “would prohibit the Department of
Defense from gifting excess equipment, such as aircraft—including
drones—armored vehicles, grenade launchers, silencers, and bombs to
local police departments. Those weapons have no place in our
streets, regardless of who may be deploying them.” 

The amendment went down to spectacular defeat, with just
62 votes in
favor and 355 against
. Lewis voted for the amendment, but he
was joined by just seven (out of a total of 41 House members with
voting privileges) of his Congressonal Black Caucus colleagues:
relatively few members of the Congressional
Black Caucus
 voted against the amendment: John Conyers
(MI-13), Donna Edwards (MD-04), Keith Ellison (MN-05), Mike Honda
(CA-17), Barbara Lee (CA-13), Bobby Scott (VA-03), Maxine Waters
(CA-43).

As Krayewski noted, among the African-American
members of Congress voting against the amendment (and thus in favor
of continued federally aided militarization of police: Rep. Lacy
Clay (D-Mo.), who represents Ferguson.

As I wrote at
The Daily Beast
recently, events in Ferguson have done far
more than bring the scandal of police militarization (finally) to a
national audience. They also open up a space for new possibilities
in politics that break with the exhausted categories of Republican
and Democrat, conservative and liberal, white and black, and so
many other seemingly intractable antagonisms. The outspoken
response of libertarian-leaning Republicans (such as Rep. Justin
Amash, who voted in favor of Grayson’s amendment, and Sen. Rand
Paul) belied a congruence of interests that is rarely acknowledged
by contemporary political discourse:

What Ferguson demonstrates is how tightly related abstract
concerns libertarians have about the government’s power and the
very real-life fears of police harassment that many African
Americans have really are. So too are other issues of interest to
both groups, ranging from school choice to sentencing reform to
occupational licensing. As these sorts of newly recognized common
causes filter through the culture, all sorts of new coalitions and
possibilities can come to fruition. Glimpses of this are already
visible in actions such as the
nearly successful effort
 by Republican Rep. Justin Amash
and Democratic Rep. John Conyers to defund National Security Agency
surveillance programs last summer.

We should add eminent domain abuse to the list, and I’m sure
there are more shared issues that warrant inclusion. Does anyone
seriously doubt that standard-issue politics are as played out as
the Comstock Lode, which just like the Democratic and Republican
parties, predates the Civil War?


Read the whole Beast piece, “The Libertarian Moment in Ferguson,
here.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/W2nyXc
via IFTTT

Labor Day Replay: The Sharing Economy

As we celebrate Labor Day, the annual
holiday dedicated to the American labor movement, it’s worth
considering how the sharing economy is changing the workforce
and rebranding
capitalism

Earlier this year, Reason TV’s Jim Epstein released
a four-part series exploring various facets of this trend. The
series, along with the companion article “All
Hail the ‘Sharing Economy!’ A Mushy Phrase Gives Liberals Cover to
Join the Fight Against Big Government
,” were originally
released on May 13, 2014. You can watch the full series above
or click the the link below for text, links, and more.  

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1q3w8AV
via IFTTT

What It’s All About: Russia, China Begin Construction Of World’s Largest Gas Pipeline

If after months of Eurasian axis formation, one still hasn’t realized why in the grand game over Ukraine supremacy – not to mention superpower geopolitics – Europe, and the West, has zero leverage, while Russia has all the trump cards, then today’s latest development in Chinese-Russian cooperation should make it abundantly clear.

Overnight, following a grand ceremony in the Siberian city of Yakutsk, Russia and China officially began the construction of a new gas pipeline linking the countries. The bottom line to Russia – nearly half a trillion after China’s CNPC agreed to buy $400bn in gas from Russia’s Gazprom back in May. In return, Russia will ship 38 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas annually over a period of 30 years. The 3,968 km pipeline linking gas fields in eastern Siberia to China will be the world’s largest fuel network in the world.

As BBC reports, “the deal will lessen Russia’s dependence on European buyers, who have imposed economic sanctions because of the crisis in Ukraine.” That is not news and has been known for months ever since the long-anticipated Holy Grail deal was signed in May. More importantly, as Zero Hedge reported last week, one awaits as the invoices become increasingly less denominated in USD, and more in CNY or RUB. Most importantly, and confirming the significance of Russia’s pivot away from Europe, which ultimately can have Qatar’s gas it so very desires, irrelevant how many thousands of innocent people have to die, the construction ceremony was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese Vice-Premier Zhang Gaoli.

China will start work on the construction of its side of the pipeline in the first half of 2015, Mr Zhang said.

 

The first gas will be pumped from Siberia to north-east China in early 2019.

 

Over the past 10 years, China has used other gas suppliers. Turkmenistan is now China’s largest foreign gas supplier. Last year, it started importing piped natural gas from Myanmar.

Increasingly it appears that China will defer to Russia when it comes to cementing bilateral commodity deals, especially if it means further distancing both sides from what has emerged as a natural foe to both aspirational nations: the United States.

Here is what Putin had to say about the latest gas pipeline, soon to be the world’s largest, during the groundbreaking ceremony outside the city of Yakutsh, via RT: “The new gas branch will significantly strengthen the economic cooperation with countries in the Asia-Pacific region and above all – our key partner China.”

Once we create a gas pipeline network here in the Far East and Siberia, we will be able to connect European pipeline system to the East. And this, in terms of export opportunities and expanding Russia’s ‘gasification’, is very beneficial. Depending on the situation in world markets, we can more effectively implement gas flows- either more to the West or to the East,” Putin told students at North-Eastern Federal University earlier on Monday.

More:

 Both President Putin and Vice Premier Zhang Gaoli signed the freshly-welded pipeline in a time-honored Russian tradition. The ‘Power of Siberia’ was welded together by workers from Chayanda gas field, overseen by CEO Aleksey Miller.

 

“Gazprom is always a reliable supplier of gas to its customers – which also applies to the ‘Power of Siberia,” Miller said.

 

The 3,968 km pipeline linking gas fields in eastern Siberia to China will be the world’s largest fuel network in the world. Both Putin and Vice Premier Zhang Gaoli have called the project the world’s largest construction project, as investment from both countries will be more than $70 billion.

 

“The gas pipeline ‘Power of Siberia’ will increase energy security and ensure Russia’s ability to fulfill export obligations,” Putin said in the opening remarks.

 

Starting in 2019, Power of Siberia will pump gas from Siberia to China’s populous northeast region as well as to Russia’s Far East. The Chinese side will start the construction of its part of the pipeline in the first half of 2015, the Vice Premier of China said.

 

Last year, China consumed about 170 billion cubic meters of natural gas and expects to consume 420 billion cubic meters per year by 2020. Europe still remains Russia’s largest energy market, buying more than 160 billion meters of Russian natural gas in 2013.

So while the west is no longer able to find any growth opportunities, with the marginal free cash flow dollar increasingly going in stock buybacks, Russia has no such problems: running from the Chayanda gas field in the Republic of Yakutia, the cost of construction is estimated at more than $20 billion (770 billion rubles), which includes other investment in the region of $7.5 billion (283 billion rubles). Russia’s largest steel pipeline manufacturer, TMK, will provide materials for the project.

The gas pipeline will become a common transit center for gas production centers in the Yakutia and Irkutsk regions.

 

The first stage of the project will be to transport gas from the Chayanda deposit in Yakutia and connect to the town of Blagoveshchensk on the Chinese border. The 968 km pipeline should be completed by 2018.

 

The Chayanda field, which will begin production in 2015, is estimated to have reserves of 1.2 trillion cubic meters in gas and 93 million tons of liquid hydrocarbons. Each year the field is expected to produce up to 25 billion cubic meters of gas and at least 1.5 million tons of oil.

 

Putin also said that China can become a shareholder in the Vankor oil and gas fields in the Krasnoyarsk region in Eastern Siberia. China will enter into a strategic relationship with Rosneft, Russia’s largest oil company, which owns the field.

But, Obama keeps repeating Russia is isolated by the entire world… Is he once again simply, gasp, lying?

To summarize all of the above: while Europe will continue to depend on Russia for its gas imports indefinitely, Russia will no longer depend on Europe for its experts.

Finally, a video of today’s festivities if only for Russia, not so much the countries which are “isolating” it…




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1u9xwlS Tyler Durden

The Great Deformation

From the Slope of HopeThis is going to be a review of David Stockman’s 768-page tome The Great Deformation, and 

0831-deform
although I never thought it was possible, it makes me angry to write this book review.

I’m not angry because I don’t like the book. On the contrary, this is the best economics book I’ve ever read. Indeed, it may be the best and most influential book I’ve ever read in my life. I only wish I had read it the moment it was published in April 2013. I only finished reading it today, and for the entire time I’ve been plowing through it, I’ve been trying to think of what I would say in this review.

Why am I angry, then, to write this? Bluntly stated, because nothing I can say will make what I want a reality. And what I want is for every literate person in the United States to read this book, cover to cover. I want them to read it. I want them to understand it. I want them to agitate for the changes that it recommends.

But I know at the outset that none of that is going to happen. The vast majority (I’ll pull a number out of the air and declare it as 90%) are too lazy, dim-witted, or apathetic to bother. And that 90%, I daresay, is a kind estimate. I would also wager that another 1% – – and that would be the fabled 1% which enjoy a storied existence at the top of the socioeconomic heap – – would be wholly irrational to embrace any of the core shifts that the book recommends. These elites, after all, are the beneficiaries of the madness elucidated therein.

Reagan’s Stockman

0831-stockmanLet’s back up. As those of you born before 1970 hopefully recall, David Stockman became nationally famous when, still in his mid-30s, he was made the budget director of the newly-elected Reagan White House. Stockman was front and center in national news for years, and I clearly remember, even as a young teenager, reading about Stockman and the battles he was waging to invoke the so-called Reaganomics. My general impression from that time was that he was smart, capable, and committed. Then, as of the mid-1980s, just like most of the rest of the nation, I stopped hearing about him.

I consider myself well-read, and I have the luxury of time to stay abreast of most financial and economic news. In spite of this, if you had asked me several months ago what had ever happened to David Stockman, I would have had absolutely no idea. I daresay most of you are in the same boat, so in brief, I’ll bring you up to speed:

After leaving the Reagan administration, Stockman joined Salomon Brothers and later was one of the earliest partners of the Blackstone Group. Years later, he went on to found his own private equity firm, Heartland Industrial Partners, for which he initially raised well over a billion dollars.

Heartland executed over twenty deals, one of which – Collins & Aikman – filed for bankruptcy. Stockman served as CEO at Collins, and early in 2007, he became the target of federal prosecutors in Manhattan as well as the SEC. From the little I’ve read about this period, the charges were completely ludicrous, and after wrecking nearly two years of Stockman’s life (as well as those of many others), the prosecutors dropped the entire fleet of charges well before a trial could even commence.

From what I can gather, Stockman’s mounting of his defense during the period of his prosecution his come-to-Jesus moment, since it dawned on him the nature of the business game he had been playing for so many years. Specifically, the hazards of the debt-saturated private equity world and, much more broadly, the entire globe that had become utterly besotted by debt. Stockman writes:

At length, I saw the light, and it had nothing to do with Paulson’s apparent illiteracy on the precepts of sound fiscal policy. The bailouts, the Fed’s frenzied money printing, the embrace of primitive Keynesian tax stimulus by a Republican White House amounted to something terrible: a de facto coup d’etat by Wall Street, resulting in Washington’s embrace of any expedient necessary to keep the financial bubble going – and no matter how offensive it was to every historic principle of free markets, sound money, and fiscal rectitude.

Stockman thus endeavored to put together this book that is fervent, passionate, articulate, and remarkable in scope. And I kept wondering to myself, if the villains in the book (Paulson, Bernanke, Obama, the corpse of Richard Nixon, Larry Summers, Yellen, etc.) actually read it, would they think to themselves (A) “Oh my God, what have I done?????” or (B) “Crap, they’re on to us.”

Notable Quotes

My copy of the book is highlighted as heavily as the Bible of a Southern Baptist preacher, so it’s hard for me to “boil down” the book to anything less than a fifty page review. I will just share a few morsels that I think help capture some of the points Mr. Stockman wants to make and the elegant fashion in which he presents them:

“This was a blatant miscarriage of governance. As will be seen, at that late stage of the delirious financial bubble which had overtaken America, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley had essentially become economic predators. Their bankruptcy would have resulted in no measurable harm to the Main Street economy, and possibly some gain. It would have also brought the curtains down on a generation of Wall Street speculators, and sent them packing in disgrace and amid massive personal losses – the only possible way to end the current repugnant regime of crony capitalist domination of the nation’s central bank.” (p. 22)

“In a healthy capitalist economy, income distribution reflects the economic justice of the marketplace, not the political engineering of the state, and properly so.” (p. 68)

“Policy measures like Fannie Mae, deposit insurance, social insurance, the Wagner Act, the farm programs, and monetary activism share a common disability: They fail to recognize that the state bears an inherent flaw that dwarfs the imperfections purported to afflict the free market; namely, that policies undertaken in the name of the public good inexorably become captured by special interests and crony capitalists who appropriate resources from society’s commons for their own private ends.” (p. 169)

“The Thomas Amendment was a nascent version of today’s delusion that economic setbacks, shortfalls, and disappointments are caused by too little money. The true cause, both in the early 1930s and today, was actually an excess of debt. This explanation is never appealing to politicians because there is no real cure for the liquidation of excess debt, except the passage of time and the forfeiture of the ill-gotten gains from the financial bubbles preceding it.” (p. 183)

It was around this time that I realized even sharing the very best of the best quotes, there would just be far too many, so I jumped toward the end of the book……

“The social insurance system is now entering an era of permanent funding crisis and chronic political turmoil. And, as detailed in chapter 32, the Bernanke stock market bubble is heading for a thundering meltdown which will vastly eclipse that of September 2008. So what lies ahead is endemic fiscal crisis, wrenching financial market dislocations, and relentlessly rising fear about financial security on Main Street.” (p. 648)

“Only a financial system addicted to and whipsawed by central bank money printing can produce such erratic, capricious, and correlated results. What is implicated here is not the doings of the free market but the corruption of free money. For that reason, the Greenspan axiom that financial bubbles can’t be prevented but only punctured and then bailed out afterward is downright perverse. Now in its third iteration, this policy is, in fact, the backstage mechanism by which society’s income and wealth are being redistributed to the top 1 percent.” (p. 656)

“While this is seemingly ironic given that Obama was reelected essentially on a platform of “fairness” for the middle class, that was content-free campaign rhetoric. The true irony is that political progressives are so indentured to Keynesian theories of demand stimulus that they have eagerly turned the nation’s central bank over to Wall Street lock, stock, and barrel.” (p. 657)

“The cruel corollary is that free market capitalism cannot help, either. It has been abused, burdened, demoralized, and impaired by decades of central bank money printing and the speculative raids and rent-seeking deformations which it fosters. Now the White House has a vague mandate that the 1 percent should pay more, but it’s too late. The coming crash will leave a lot less to tax.” (p. 671)

The Rogue’s Gallery

There are some definite “bad guys” (and bad events) skewered in these nearly 800 pages. The names are all known to you, but the deeds, and their details, are articulated in ways I didn’t understand well until now. These misfits include:

+ Richard “Tricky Dick” Nixon;
+ FDR (particularly his debasing of the dollar and confiscation of gold);0831-fatpig
+ Alan Greenspan’s LTCM bailout in 1998;
+ Alan Greenspan’s panicked, rate-plunging response to the Internet bubble collapse;
+ Alan Greenspan’s deliberate inflation of the housing bubble (sense a trend here?);
+ Larry Summers, pictured here;
+ The military-industrial complex, wholly and utterly bloated beyond need;
+ Medicare/Medicaid/Obamacare and the breathtaking price inflation in the medical racket;
+ The “timorous” math professor Benjamin Bernanke;
+ The GM bailout, TARP package, and smorgasbord of “relief” programs in late 2008/early 2009
+ And, of course, President Obama

There are a few heroes mentioned in these pages, such as Fed chairman William McChesney Martin, Paul Volcker, Eisenhower, and Herbert Hoover (the last most particularly for the well-meaning, but aborted, efforts Hoover invoked to aid the nation as it entered Depression, only to be nefariously thwarted by a breathtakingly cynical FDR).

The Gospel?

Is this book absolutely perfect? Of course not. There are a smattering of typos and misspellings here and there, as one might expect of any book so large that could be used as a weapon of self-defense. It also is peppered with some phrases and expressions that get a bit overused or could be replaced with simpler language (for instance, “it cannot be gainsaid” could just as easily, and more clearly, be expressed by the word “undeniable.”)

It’s also on the long side, and it needn’t be quite so lengthy. I personally found a few of the chapters, particularly those oriented toward leveraged buyouts and private equity, to not add much to the polemic. Stockman knows these topics so deeply, it was probably tempting to spend extra time espousing them, not unlike the way I prattled on in my own recent book about the Silicon Valley’s Internet bubble.

But these trifles shave a hundredth of a point off the 100.00 score I would otherwise give the book. It is written with such clarity, fervor, and well-intentioned intellect that, even forty pages into it, I could hardly wait to climb go my rooftop to tell the world to go buy it. Mr. Stockman’s days at the Harvard Divinity School have eased their way into the pages, because the prose has reads like the fiery gospel of a true believer.

It goes without saying that these ideas and arguments are not the scribblings of a lunatic standing on the soapbox in Central Park. Stockman occupied the highest levels of government and finance for his entire working life, and he is a wealthy, famous, and well-connected man who could easily, along with the rest of his 1% brethren, rest comfortably on his laurels for the rest of his days. He chose instead to bring to the truth – – the bare, detailed, and important-to-understand truth – – to the rest of us.

What Needs to Be Done

The final chapter of Great Deformation is the powerful money-shot to the entire tome, but the potency is instantly and honestly neutered by the reality – which Stockman proclaims at the outset – that none of the stated cures will see the light of day. In a word, it’s simply too late, and only after a wrenching, worldwide financial cataclysm (that will make 2008 look like a gentle stroll with a lovely lass on a sunlit day) will humanity have the opportunity to get it right.

The last real opportunity to set things straight was presented – as Stockman writes – “on a silver platter” – but Washington doesn’t have an iota of the political will that would have been required to seize that opportunity. The America today, and particularly the 1%, are far too fat, happy, and accustomed to the easy way out to undergo such a thing.

Having said that, even though it will break your heart (or should break your heart) to read what has happened, what probably will happen, and what might have been, you owe it to yourself to read this book. America is too flabby to buck up and face reality, but you as an individual should at least take it upon yourself to understand better than 99% of your compatriots how we got here and what road lies ahead. Thank you, Mr. Stockman.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/W28Xe8 Tim Knight from Slope of Hope

Biden: “Unions Built The Middle Class In America”

You didn’t build that… Unions did. Vice President Joe Biden gave a ‘rousing’ Labor Day speech this morning explaining that “Unions did, in fact, build the middle-class… and that built The United States of America as we know it.”

 

 

Seems like the policies since the crash have not been helping…

 

FACT: There is a record divergence between the exuberant ‘rich’ and crushed ‘middle class’




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1vEAIsw Tyler Durden

Who Said It? Chairman Mao Or President Obama

“Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.” While some quotes are indelibly linked with certain politicians – in this case, Mao Zedong – in many other cases, what leaders say can sound the same, no matter what end of the political spectrum they sit on. WSJ Real Time China blog asks can you tell some of his other musings apart from those of U.S. President Barack Obama? Or current Chinese President Xi Jinping?

 

Green is the correct answer; the numbers are respondents guesses.

 

Full interactive quiz here…




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1pAySqj Tyler Durden

A. Barton Hinkle on How Handouts Corrupt All Governors

Former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell is under fire
for doing special favors on behalf of Jonnie Williams and his
nutritional-supplement company Star Scientific. McDonnell’s defense
essentially boils down to this: “So what? He did the same for lots
of other companies, too.” But as A. Barton Hinkle observes, that
defense is not only an indictment of the former governor, it’s an
indictment of Virginia politics generally.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1sV1poe
via IFTTT

Looks Like Michael Sam Might Not Be First Out NFL Player

At least we were spared tired jokes about "tight ends."Defensive end Michael Sam got
huge amounts of media attention earlier in February for coming out
of the closet as his college football career came to an end. The
big deal was that he was good enough to play in the National
Football League (NFL). If he were drafted and took to the field, he
would be the first openly gay, out to the public, professional
football player. There have been players that had come out after
they had retired, and there are likely players in the league right
now that are gay (and teammates know), but Sam was the first to
come out to the larger public.

He was drafted by the St. Louis Rams and played in the
preseason, got positive responses and some good numbers (including
some sacks).
But the Rams cut Sam Saturday
in favor of another rookie (and
they cut the rest of their seventh-round draft picks as well). He
has not been picked up by another team yet, nor has he been asked
to join the Rams’
practice squad
.

This does not mean Sam’s NFL dreams are at an end, but it
certainly adds some challenges. His stats were analyzed in the
media probably more than any other defensive rookie in his
situation and ESPN ended up with some egg on its face over a
segment that essentially asked if Sam was staring at
other guys’ penises
in the showers.

Even if
Sam
isn’t ultimately the first out player, I give it a year,
tops. The media may have gotten weird about him, but
polls
and public reaction to Sam show that an athlete’s
homosexuality isn’t the big deal it would have been, say, a decade
ago.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/W1Woj6
via IFTTT

The ‘Wages-Fuel-Demand’ Fallacy

Submitted by Alasdair Macleod via GoldMoney.com,

In recent months talking heads, disappointed with the lack of economic recovery, have turned their attention to wages. If only wages could grow, they say, there would be more demand for goods and services: without wage growth, economies will continue to stagnate.

It amounts to a non-specific call to stimulate aggregate demand by continuing with or even accelerating the expansion of money supply. The thinking is the same as that behind Bernanke’s monetary distribution by helicopter. Unfortunately for these wishful-thinkers the disciplines of the markets cannot be bypassed. If you give everyone more money without a balancing increase in the supply of goods, there is no surer way of stimulating price inflation, collapsing a currency’s purchasing power and losing all control of interest rates.

The underlying error is to fail to understand that economising individuals make things in order to be able to buy things. That is the order of events, earn it first and spend it second. No amount of monetary shenanigans can change this basic fact. Instead, expanding the quantity of money will always end up devaluing the wealth and earning-power of ordinary people, the same people that are being encouraged to spend, and destroying genuine economic activity in the process.

This is the reason monetary stimulation never works, except for a short period if and when the public are fooled by the process. Businesses – owned and managed by ordinary people – are not fooled by it any more: they are buying in their equity instead of investing in new production because they know that investing in production doesn’t earn a return. This is the logical response by businesses to the destruction of their customers’ wealth through currency debasement.

Let me sum up currency debasement with an aphorism:

“You print some money to rob the wealth of ordinary people…

 

to give to the banks to lend to business…

 

to make their products…

 

for customers to buy with money devalued by printing.”

It is as ridiculous a circular proposition as perpetual motion, yet central banks never seem to question it. Monetary stimulus fails with every credit cycle when the destruction of wealth is exposed by rising prices. But in this credit cycle the deception was so obvious to the general public that it failed from the outset.

The last five years have seen all beliefs in the manageability of aggregate demand comprehensively demolished by experience. The unfortunate result of this failure is that central bankers now see no alternative to maintaining things as they are, because the financial system has become horribly over-geared and probably wouldn’t survive the rise in interest rates a genuine economic recovery entails anyway. Price inflation would almost certainly rise well above the 2% target forcing central banks to raise interest rates, throwing bonds and stocks into a severe bear market, and imperilling government finances. The financial system is simply too highly geared to survive a credit-driven recovery.

Japan, which has accelerated monetary debasement of the yen at an unprecedented rate, finds itself in this trap. If anything, the pace of its economic deterioration is increasing. The explanation is simple and confirms the obvious: monetary debasement impoverishes ordinary people. Far from boosting the economy it is rapidly driving us into a global slump.

The solution is not higher wages.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1u8QxoD Tyler Durden

Spain Sells First-Ever 50 Year Bonds At 4% Coupon

Perhaps in order to celebrate its manufacturing PMI dropping from 53.9 to a below expectations 52.8, refuting the “growth story” promoted by its definitionally re-revised GDP (where the long overdue boost from hookers and blow is finally leading the country to new and improved Keynesian growth curves), moments ago Spain joined the likes of Canada, Caterpillar and Goldman and just issued, for the first time in its history, 50 Year bonds in a private placement. From Bloomberg:

  • SPAIN SELLS EU1B 50-YR BONDS
  • SPAIN TREASURY SELLS FIRST-EVER 50-YR BONDS, COUPON 4%

And since there is no hope that Spain will ever repay this bond, whose rate is dictated by anything – mostly the ECB’s monetary policy – but the fundamentals it is functionally equivalent to Spain raising new equity without a maturity date and a 4% dividend.

The only question is whether the buyers of this syndication are the Elliotts of the world, who are happy to wait the 1-3 years until this too bond joins Argentina in the “trading flat” category, before they exercise their legal powers as yet another debt-for-equity conversion transfers billions in public assets into private hands.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1q2WfrU Tyler Durden