If You Don’t Vote, You Can Still Complain As Much As You Want

It’s that time again, when cheerful boosters of political
participation start chirping a familiar Election Day tune:

If you don’t vote, you can’t complain!

This sentiment has become such a cliché you probably barely
notice it anymore, right? But it’s popping up everywhere from the
Santa Monica
Daily Press
to random New
Jersey signboards
.

In everyday life the admonition makes sense, of course: I asked
you what you wanted for dinner earlier today and you didn’t have
any good ideas, so now you’d better sit down, shut up, and eat your
tofu stroganoff, thankyouverymuch.

But this same notion, when applied to behavior at the ballot box
is actually a troubling perversion and conflation of the concepts
of consent and free speech. 

reason coverFrom my November 2012 Reason cover
story, “Your
Vote Doesn’t Count
“:

For someone who complains about politics, policy, and
politicians for a living, the prohibition on complaining by
nonvoters strikes close to home. Again, this Election Day cliché is
intuitively appealing. If someone invests in an enterprise, we
generally recognize that he has more right than an outsider to
determine the course of that enterprise. And voting feels like an
investment: It takes time and perhaps costs money.

In his 1851 book Social Statics, the English
radical Herbert Spencer neatly describes the rhetorical jujitsu
surrounding voting, consent, and complaint, then demolishes the
argument. Say a man votes and his candidate wins. The voter is then
“understood to have assented” to the acts of his representative.
But what if he voted for the other guy? Well, then, the argument
goes, “by taking part in such an election, he tacitly agreed to
abide by the decision of the majority.” And what if he abstained?
“Why then he cannot justly complain…seeing that he made no
protest.” Spencer tidily sums up: “Curiously enough, it seems that
he gave his consent in whatever way he acted—whether he said yes,
whether he said no, or whether he remained neuter! A rather awkward
doctrine this.” Indeed.

Whether there is a duty to be civically engaged, to act as a
good citizen, is a separate question from the issue of voting. But
if such a duty exists, there are many ways to perform it, including
(perhaps especially) complaining. According to Mankiw’s argument,
the ignorant voter is a far less admirable citizen than the
serial-letter-writing Tea Partier who can’t be bothered to show up
on Election Day.

The right to complain is, mercifully, unrelated to any
hypothetical duty to vote. It was ensured, instead, by the
Founders, all of whom were extraordinary bellyachers
themselves. 

Read
the whole piece
for handy replies to other Election Day
commonplaces, such as “every vote counts!” and “voting is a civic
duty” and “voting is fun.”

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1rTQrx8
via IFTTT

Japan’s Monetary Pearl Harbor

Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith of OfTwoMinds blog,

Trying to "fix" a sclerotic, inefficient state-cartel economy by boosting inflation–the ultimate goal of Japan's Monetary Pearl Harbor– is a self-liquidating path to destruction.

The Bank of Japan's surprise expansion of financial stimulus strikes me as the monetary equivalent of Pearl Harbor –not in the sense of launching a pre-emptive war (though the move does raise the odds of a global currency war), but in the sense of a leadership pursuing a Grand Strategy to the point of self-destruction because they have no alternative within their intellectual and political framework.
 

In the years before Japan's December 7, 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor, the Imperial government's Grand Strategy was simple: bring the entire Asian-Pacific region under the control of the Japanese Empire.

 

That this Imperial Project would necessarily lead to conflict with the United States was baked into the project from the moment of its inception.

The Japanese military had embraced the notion of the Decisive Battle as its core war-fighting doctrine. The goal is to draw the opponent's main force into a battle where that force could be decisively destroyed. With their military power shattered, the opponent would be forced to sue for peace.
 
Just as the logic of Imperial expansion made the attack on Pearl Harbor inevitable, the logic of the Decisive Battle led to the crushing defeats at the Battle of Midway and Leyte Gulf.
 
It is this stubborn allegiance to a self-destructive strategy that reminds me of Imperial Japan's devotion to expansion. In the 25 years since the 1989 apex of Japanese credit-bubble triumphalism, these same policies–monetary easing, zero interest rates and fiscal deficits to fund Bridges to Nowhere–have only exacerbated the stagnation of Japan's economy and social adaptability.
 
If this massive expansion of debt is the Decisive Monetary Battle that is supposed to defeat deflation and stagnation, it will inevitably result in defeat and capitulation.
 
What is needed is structural reform of the real causes of that stagnation–real political and financial reform that dismantle the structural causes of Japan's failure. But such a strategy is not even discussed, much less actively considered, because it would upend the powerful elites and vested interests who benefit from the status quo Grand Strategy.
 
As John Kenneth Galbraith observed: "People of privilege will always risk their complete destruction rather than surrender any material part of their advantage."This describes Japan's Status Quo of cartels and central state technocrats perfectly. Unfortunately, everybody else gets destroyed along with the Elites when the system implodes.
 
The political resistance in Japan to meaningful reform is immense. The inflexible sclerosis of Japan's economy is described in Voodoo Abenomics: Japan's Failed Comeback Plan (Foreign Affairs):
To lift productivity, Japan needs serious structural changes to promote creative destruction, the process of replacing decaying firms with vibrant ones. The sectors of Japan’s economy that face international competition, such as the auto industry, enjoy high productivity. But the lion’s share of the economy is domestically oriented, and much of it is shielded from both international and domestic competition by domestic regulations and cartel-like business practices.
 
Japan’s milk market isn’t even open to domestic competition. The powerful farm cooperative known as Japan Agriculture uses its stranglehold on distribution to protect inefficient farmers in the main part of Japan by hindering shipments of milk from the larger, more efficient farms in the northern island of Hokkaido. Tokyo turns a blind eye because Japan Agriculture is a powerful electoral ally of Abe’s political party and because rural voters are disproportionately represented in the Diet. A real reformer would scrap Japan Agriculture’s exemption from the Antimonopoly Act, a law passed in 1947 designed to encourage competition, and use the act to crack down on such practices.
The net result of protecting cartels and fiefdoms by lowering interest rates to zero and flooding the financial sector with "free money" is social depression, characterized by the erosion of employment, and a hollowing out of the economy's core strengths:
Since Japan’s rigid labor laws make it nearly impossible to lay off permanent employees in downtimes, companies now tend to fill open slots with part-time or temporary workers, and they typically pay them a third less. Today, 17 percent of Japanese men aged 25 to 34 hold such second-class jobs, up from four percent in 1988. Low-paid temps and part-timers now make up 38 percent of Japanese employees of all ages and both sexes — a stunning figure for a society that once prided itself on equality.
Trying to "fix" a sclerotic, inefficient state-cartel economy by boosting inflation–the ultimate goal of quantitative easing and the Monetary Pearl Harbor– is a self-liquidating path to destruction:
Since 1997, wages in Japan have fallen by nine percent in real terms. They are expected to continue falling, despite highly advertised wage hikes by a few hundred giant firms whose profits from overseas sales have been artificially boosted by the weaker yen. Abe claims that wages will rise once workers and firms come to expect inflation. In reality, deflation is not the cause of Japan’s problems but a symptom. Trying to cure Japan’s malaise by generating inflation is like trying to cure a fever by putting ice on the thermometer.
The same devotion to a self-destructive Grand Strategy characterized Japan's Imperial High Command: dissent was suppressed, lest the truth step on powerful toes. And so the voices of experience within the Establishment who recognized the enormous risks of the Grand Strategy were ignored or silenced.
 
Admiral Yamamoto, architect of Pearl Harbor and Japan's early victories in the Pacific, provided one such voice of caution: "In the first six to twelve months of a war with the United States and Great Britain I will run wild and win victory upon victory. But then, if the war continues after that, I have no expectation of success."
 
Despite his reputation and rank, his influence within the Power Elite was limited. The Grand Strategy of self-destruction played out with all the hubris and inevitability of a classic tragedy.
 

Now the Bank of Japan is pursuing its own self-destructive tragedy, and all the world can do is watch from afar and hope the eventual collapse of this Grand Strategy doesn't take the entire global financial system down with it.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/10l5vxu Tyler Durden

Head Scratcher: Connecticut Gov. Dan Malloy Raised Taxes, Increased Spending, Demonized Guns. So Why Isn’t He More Popular?

Dan
Malloy Is Progressives’ Dream Governor. So Why Isn’t He
Winning?


From immigration to gun control and the minimum wage, Connecticut’s
Dan Malloy signed into law a wish list of lefty priorities. But
he’s locked in a tie with his Republican challenger.

That’s the actual headline and sub-head to a Daily
Beast
piece about Dan Malloy, the incumbent governor of
Connecticut whose re-election
is looking pretty shakey
.

Higher taxes on the rich? Check. A state earned income tax
credit for the poor? Check. A higher minimum wage? Connecticut was
the first state to raise it to $10.10 an hour after President Obama
called for it. There is more: mandatory paid sick leave, repeal of
the death penalty…strict new gun control laws, and massive new
spending on public education, higher education, and
infrastructure.


Full Beast piece here.

Here’s a hint as to why Malloy is in a pickle: Most of the
things he did, especially when it comes to taxing and spending
more, are genuinely unpopular. Indeed,
just 23 percent
of Americans (a recent high, by the way) see
themselves as liberal.

He’s not in a tight race despite his legislative
victories but because of them. You know, kind of like the
way Barack Obama’s first two years of complete free run led to a
GOP-controlled House.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1DUdNJr
via IFTTT

Ed Krayewski on the Libertarian Case for Voting

I VotedVoting is important, writes Ed Krayewski, who’ll
be voting in his 39th consecutive election tomorrow. There are a
lot of shitty reasons to vote, and there’s reason to think
low-information voters can be dangerous. Being a low-information
voter is one of several great reasons not to vote. And
trying to intimidate people into voting, as some groups around the
country are doing, is ridiculous. True, individual votes matter
very little. They almost certainly never tip an election.
Nevertheless, writes Krayewski, voting is important, because in a
democratic system the absence of a vote enforces the illusion of
the consent of the governed.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1DUdHBD
via IFTTT

WTI Tumbles To 29-Month Lows After Saudi Price Cut

After initially jerking higher after Saudi Arabia released its new ‘lower-prices-for-the-US’ strategy, it appears the market began to realize that in fact – as we warned – Saudi Arabia may be willing to accept prices “lower for longer.” WTI futures are trading below $78.50 – the lowest since June 2012 (and its dragging Trannies lower today)…

 

 

As Bloomberg reports, confirming our note over the weekend,

Saudi Arabia, the world’s biggest oil exporter, is telling the market it won’t cut output to lift crude back to $100 a barrel and that prices must fall further before it does so, according to consultant FACTS Global Energy.

 

Swelling supplies from non-OPEC producers drove Brent crude into a bear market on Oct. 8 amid waning demand from China, the world’s second-largest importer. The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries meets Nov. 27 to consider changing its production target in the face of the highest U.S. crude output in almost 30 years.

 

“Production of shale oil in the U.S. will not be hit as hard as the Saudis think” by the price decline, FGE Chairman Fereidun Fesharaki said at a conference today in Doha, Qatar. Producers in the U.S. “can withstand a lot of pressure” by reining in their operating costs before they curb investment in new wells and production, he said.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/10OWv4y Tyler Durden

Symbolic “Arbeit Macht Frei” Gate Stolen From Dachau

If “work set you free” in the Nazi concentration camps of WWII, then it appears in this consequence-less society in which we live, stealing is the new normal. As CBS reports, 5 years after a Swedish neo-Nazi was found gulity of stealing the symbolic concentration camp sign from Auschwitz; a wrought-iron gate bearing the Nazis’ cynical slogan “Arbeit macht frei,” or “Work sets you free,” has been stolen from the former Dachau concentration camp, police said Sunday. “The theft of such a symbolic object is an offensive attack on the memory of the Holocaust,” said Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial.

 

 

As CBS reports,

Security officials noticed early Sunday morning that the gate measuring 75 by 37 inches — set into a larger iron gate — was missing, police said in a statement. Whoever stole it during the night would have had to climb over another gate to reach it, they added.

 

Police said they found nothing in the immediate vicinity of the camp and appealed for anyone who noticed any suspicious people or vehicles to come forward.

 

Dachau, near Munich, was the first concentration camp set up by the Nazis in 1933. More than 200,000 people from across Europe were held there and over 40,000 prisoners died before it was liberated by U.S. forces on April 29, 1945. The camp is now a memorial.

 

Memorial director Gabriele Hammermann condemned the theft of the gate, which she described as “the central symbol for the prisoners’ ordeal,” news agency dpa reported.

 

She said a private security service supervises the site but officials had decided against surveillance of the former camp with video cameras because they didn’t want to turn it into a “maximum-security unit.” That decision may now have to be reviewed, she added.

 

A blog posted by Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial wrote that “while we do not know who is behind the theft of the sign, the theft of such a symbolic object is an offensive attack on the memory of the Holocaust.”

 

In December 2009, the infamous “Arbeit macht frei” sign that spanned the main gate of the Auschwitz death camp, built by the Nazis in occupied Poland, was stolen. Police found it three days later cut into pieces in a forest on the other side of Poland.

 

A Swedish man who had a neo-Nazi past was found guilty of instigating that theft and jailed in his homeland. Five Poles also were convicted of involvement and imprisoned.

*  *  *




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1s8ZiMy Tyler Durden

Election 2014 – Why I Opt Out of Voting

Before I get to the Dissident Dad’s latest post, I want to provide my own perspective with regard to this very important debate. While I agree that voting is generally meaningless in our current system, this is because the two choices we are given are 99% of the time captured cronies of the two corrupt political parties.

So this begs the question, can we ever get real choices on the ballot? I believe we can, but we need a much larger percentage of the population aware and engaged. While I completely respect the decision to not vote for either false choice (for example, in Colorado both choices for Governor are horrific), I hope people who make this choice don’t altogether give up on grassroots activism and civil disobedience, but rather direct their energy elsewhere.

I hope that Liberty Blizkrieg readers will take to the comments section and discuss this very important debate…

The Ritual of Voting
by the Dissident Dad

Screen Shot 2014-11-03 at 12.43.53 PM

This year, my wife and I will – for the second time in our adult lives – not vote. Previously, I would have seen this stance as many people do: as an irresponsible act. The ritual of voting is very much like taking communion in church for half of this country.

continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/1tArITV
via IFTTT

Whatever Happened to Press Freedom and Free Speech? Nick Gillespie at Newseum on Wed

Attention, D.C. residents! On
Wednesday, I’ll be part of a great program at The Newseum being put
on by the great Brit site Spiked. Tickets are free and all are
welcome!

Details:

Across the Western world, it is no longer just governments that
see a free and rowdy press as a bad thing. So, increasingly, do
many ostensibly liberal campaigners, and even many writers and
journalists. There are many new threats to press freedom; not only
laws, but also conformism, pressure from reformers, and a tendency
to blame tabloid media in particular for every social and
intellectual ill of our age. The modern, democratic West was born
from the efforts of people who believed passionately in a free
press – from England’s Levellers to America’s founding fathers to
Europe’s men of the Enlightenment – yet today, it is often the
upper echelons of Western intellectual society who feel most
uncomfortable with the ideal of a free press.

Why has press freedom fallen so far out of favour? Why are some
people so riled by the existence of muck‐raking, trouble-causing
papers and other outlets, when that is the very business hacks have
been involved in for centuries? If the modern West sprung from a
renewed belief in freedom – including, crucially, press freedom –
does today’s discomfort with a free press tell us something about
the corrosion of Western values more broadly? Can we recover the
Jeffersonian view of press freedom being essential to democracy and
stability?

Joining me on the panel will be Spiked’s Brendan O’Neill, Al
Jazeera’s Ray Suarez, and the Committee to Protect Journalists’
Courtney C. Radsch.

10am – 4pm

Weds 5 November

The Newseum
555 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW Washington
DC 20001


RSVP here.

Here’s an interview I did with Spiked about the issues we’ll
discuss:
“The best answer to bad speech? More speech.”

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/13AocPL
via IFTTT

In (Partial) Defense of Rock the Vote’s Nonvoters

Rock the Vote trigger warning.Last month a bunch of celebrities appeared in an

unwatchably bad PSA
for Rock the Vote, the record industry’s
love
child
with the Democratic Party. The point of the video is that
viewers should participate in this year’s midterm elections, but
The Washington Post now
reports
that at least five of the clip’s stars—Lena Dunham,
Whoopi Goldberg, Natasha Lyonne, E.J. Johnson, and Darren Criss—did
not cast ballots in the last midterms.

For this the celebs are being
damned
as
hypocrites
. But really, it’s perfectly rational to urge large
blocs of people to vote while not bothering to do it yourself.
Casting one ballot isn’t likely to affect the outcome of any major
election. Getting a bunch of your fans to the polls, on the other
hand, might actually have an impact. If the stars have failed as
activists, it isn’t because they don’t always vote; it’s because
their video is more likely to inspire a wave of seppuku deaths than
a great march to the polling stations.

The PSA is embedded below. Here’s a great drinking game: Try to
watch it to the end, then tally up how much liquor you downed in a
desperate effort to blot out what you were seeing. The record was
set by Mrs. Bettina Leach of Albany, New York, who passed out
halfway through the three-and-a-half-minute ad. When she came to a
few hours later, she was surrounded by seven empty bottles of rum,
a half-empty flask of rye, and—this is the scary part—an “I Voted”
sticker. (*)

(* Full disclosure: That story is not actually
true.)

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/10kJ9w1
via IFTTT