Martin Armstrong Fears A Looming “Dark Age”

Submitted by Martin Armstrong via ArmstrongEconomics.com,

Feudalism did not take place because of the greedy rich.

Government collapsed with the Roman Empire following Romulus Augustus. People abandoned their property in Rome and fled away from taxation to the suburbs. With no government, there was no rule of law. People thereby agreed to be serfs to work the land in return for security. This system lasted until the Black Death of the 14th century.

medieval-agriculture

So it was not the “rich” that created the system or the collapse of government.

The rich have no power or desire to compel society to accept such a system. For that to emerge, we need a Dark Age with losses of probably 50% of the population through disease/plague, and in turn the collapse of government. Then the landscape would break up into small units for safety. Major corporations would collapse for they need a coherent society to sell products.

The danger of “socialism” is stepping in the direction of communism where it is the government that consumes everything for they have the army, guns, police, whatever.

Government seeks to sustain itself and thus consumes everything, which ultimately leads to revolution. The police are already moving toward being the enemy against the people by supporting the state rather than protecting the population. This was the PRECISE complaint Thomas Jefferson included in the Declaration of Independence — protecting the agents of the king with mock trials.

So the danger (absent a drak age) is we move toward a totalitarian state, and ultimately toward revolution whereby we create a real democracy for once rather than a republic that devolves into an oligarchy with career politicians.

No Republic has ever resisted the path to oligarchy and that is the real danger we face. The question becomes how far down this historical path do we go? The path is well worn. The markers are clear and never change.

cntrl_alt_del

A Dark Age is a control-alt-delete; reboot and start all over again. The problem: Dark Ages have existed numerous times and they tend to last 600 years. When we look at such things, it is important to dig to the foundation to reveal how such trends emerge.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1Urisw2 Tyler Durden

State Agents Investigate Yoga Instructor Because She Was Accused of Giving Bird Feathers to Kids

Renee BierbaumThe trouble isn’t quite over for Renee Bierbaum—the widow, mother, and martial artist whose home-based yoga studio was threatened by her county government and a Native-American activist accusing her of cultural appropriation. Two officers from Florida’s Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) recently visited Bierbaum at her house to investigate whether she was illegally selling migratory bird feathers.

The FWC received an anonymous tip—it’s not clear who sent it—that Bierbaum was “dealing in illegal bird feathers” by giving them to children during her yoga and art workshops for kids. She was also accused of possessing headdresses with wrongfully-acquired feathers in them.

“I don’t own those hats,” Bierbaum says. “I just model them.”

State and federal laws prohibit people from, possessing, trading, or selling migratory bird feathers. Native Americans, however, can apply for special permits to sell feathers from hawks and eagles.

Bierbaum told Reason—and the officers who questioned her—that she wasn’t peddling feathers.

“I said, ‘You’re welcome to search my house,'” Bierbaum says. “[The officer] goes, ‘No, that’s not necessary. It is illegal to deal, sell, or give away migratory bird feathers.’ I already knew that, but thank you so much. They were nice gentleman.”

The anonymous nature of the accusation makes it impossible to know for sure who sicced the authorities on Bierbaum. But a thread at newagefraud.org—a website for Native Americans to call out people who sell Native American ceremonies and memorabilia, in violation of their spiritual beliefs—provides a clue. One of the posts speculates that Bierbaum is “providing kids with illegal feathers.” Other posts in the same thread were written by user “White Horse,” whose real name is Sal Serbin.

Serbin is in fact the very same Native American activist who alerted county officials to the fact that Bierbaum’s at-home yoga studio was in violation of a zoning ordinance. He did so because he resented the fact that she planned to host a sweat lodge retreat. Sweat lodges are a part of Native American culture, and Serbin objects to anyone using them to turn a profit.

“I’m over this guy,” says Bierbaum. “This is war.”

Serbin did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

As for Bierbaum’s yoga studio, she has already raised the money necessary to apply for a permit—thanks to a wealth of donations from sympathetic people all over the world. She also obtained legal assistance to help her finally get it up and running.

In the meantime, Bierbaum is allowed to teach yoga—on her own property—but only if she doesn’t try to make any money from it.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1VsD6w9
via IFTTT

Computers as Oracles: True Answers We Won’t Understand

DeepMindThe AlphaGo program devised by DeepMind has beaten a human master of the game of Go and is set to play the world’s leading player of the game in March. Nearly two decades ago, IBM’s Deep Blue beat world chess champion Gary Kasparov using basically brute force computation. The AlphaGo program is different. In an article in Nature, the artificial intelligence researchers at DeepMind explain how they developed the system.  From the abstract:

The game of Go has long been viewed as the most challenging of classic games for artificial intelligence owing to its enormous search space and the difficulty of evaluating board positions and moves. Here we introduce a new approach to computer Go that uses ‘value networks’ to evaluate board positions and ‘policy networks’ to select moves. These deep neural networks are trained by a novel combination of supervised learning from human expert games, and reinforcement learning from games of self-play. Without any lookahead search, the neural networks play Go at the level of state-of-the-art Monte Carlo tree search programs that simulate thousands of random games of self-play. AlphaGoBoardWe also introduce a new search algorithm that combines Monte Carlo simulation with value and policy networks. Using this search algorithm, our program AlphaGo achieved a 99.8% winning rate against other Go programs, and defeated the human European Go champion by 5 games to 0. This is the first time that a computer program has defeated a human professional player in the full-sized game of Go, a feat previously thought to be at least a decade away.

An accompanying editorial notes that AlphaCo’s play is “intuitive” and that the folks at DeepMind do not know what the AlphaGo system is “thinking” when it makes a move. This observation provokes the editors to speculate about how we humans will have to deal with the advent of artificial intelligences whose workings we don’t (and can’t) understand:

As shown by its results, the moves that AlphaGo selects are invariably correct. But the interplay of its neural networks means that a human can hardly check its working, or verify its decisions before they are followed through. As the use of deep neural network systems spreads into everyday life — they are already used to analyse and recommend financial transactions — it raises an interesting concept for humans and their relationships with machines. The machine becomes an oracle; its pronouncements have to be believed.

When a conventional computer tells an engineer to place a rivet or a weld in a specific place on an aircraft wing, the engineer — if he or she wishes — can lift the machine’s lid and examine the assumptions and calculations inside. That is why the rest of us are happy to fly. Intuitive machines will need more than trust: they will demand faith.

Just as reminder, Hebrews 11:1 declares: “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.”

Is the age of computational  about to dawn?

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1VsD3Ak
via IFTTT

When Barry Met Sandy, Obamacare for Millionaires, Jets Settle Cheerleader Lawsuit: P.M. Links

  • Bernie Sanders met with President Obama at the White House today, saying he had a “constructive” conversation with the president.
  • Millionaires who retire early can take advantage of Obamacare subsidies.
  • The United Nations has invited representatives of the Syrian government and the opposition to peace talks at Geneva.
  • China has come out in support of a U.N. attempt to condemn North Korea for its most recent nuclear tests.
  • The New York Jets settled a wage suit filed by their cheerleaders.
  • Joseph Fiennes will play Michael Jackson in a British TV comedy about Jackson, Marlon Brando, and Elizabeth Taylor going on a road trip from New York City to California after 9/11.

New at Reason.com:

Theft-by-Government Continues Through Eminent Domain: Governments ignoring the constitutional limitations to eminent domain. By A. Barton Hinkle

Brownstone Brooklyn’s Racial Divide: Why Are the Schools So Segregated?: How residential assignment keeps kids who are black and white, rich and poor, apart. By Jim Epstein

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1VsD3jV
via IFTTT

“Let Them Eat CaQE”: Yellen Abandons Markets; Stocks Plunge

"F'ed Up"

 

 

 

Let's start with the obvious – The Fed f##ked up… as September is now the next meeting when rates are evenb "maybe" expected to hike.

 

Post-Fed – things did not go well…

 

Nasdaq was the worst today, crushed by AAPL but The Dow was double-whammied by Boeing also… Dow lost 121 points from BA (-77) and AAPL (-44)

 

Absolute chaos in the volatility complex as The Fed statement hit…

 

It's not over yet…

 

Apple was a de-brainer disaster… biggest single day drop sicne Jan 2014 and lowest close since July 2014… AAPL lost over 3 TWTRs today

 

And Boeing was battered – we're gonna need more Ex-Im Bank…

 

FANGs are FUBAR – NFLX and TSLA are now down 20% year-to-date… FANGs are now down 12.6% from their highs in December

 

Seriously! – once again stocks followed crude… until The fed broke it… Good news – fundamentals matter again, oh wait!

 

Treasury yields collapsed after The Fed statement…

 

The USD Index dropped on The FOMC Statement, extending losses on the week

 

Commodities all rose on the USD weakness but crude and copper slipped after The Fed and PMs rallied…

 

Russia-OPEC discussion pumped oil higher to run stops above yesterday's highs – despite surging inventories…

 

Gold jumped once again, nearing its 200DMA…

 

So in summary – if you have any questions about buying the dip or what to do next…

Charts: Bloomberg

 


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1Sk1y3h Tyler Durden

Alberta Loses Most Jobs In 34 Years As Oil Crunch Cripples Labor Market

Times are tough in Alberta and to be sure, we’ve piled it on heavy when it comes to cataloguing the long list of pitiable outcomes that have accompanied crude’s steep slide.

The province is at the center of Canada’s dying oil patch and as crude extended its seemingly endless decline last year, Alberta saw oil and gas investment plunge by a third. That’s bad news for authorities who count on resources for 30% of provincial revenues.

Rig activity fell by half in the first seven months of 2015 and as the job losses mounted, the sorrow deepened – literally. Suicide rates jumped by 30% and in Calgary commercial break-ins almost doubled from a year earlier, while bank robberies were up 65% and home invasions increased 52% (read more here).

Meanwhile, food bank usage spiked as those who used to be donors found themselves depending on the free meals for subsistence.

And speaking of food, prices for fresh fruit and vegetables are seeing double-digit inflation thanks to the plunging loonie.

All in all, a very bad situation indeed and on Tuesday we learned that the picture was actually materially worse than an initial round of statistics led us to believe.

“Statscan’s annual revisions of its national Labour Force Survey data ratcheted up Alberta’s net job losses last year to 19,600, from the 14,600 the statistical agency originally reported in its final 2015 survey released in early January,” The Globe And Mail reports, adding that the losses “exceed the 17,000 jobs Alberta shed in the Great Recession in 2009.”

In fact, 2015 was the worst year for job losses in the province since 1982.

By the end of last year, Alberta’s unemployment rate had risen to 7.1% from just 4.8% at the end of 2014. As The Globe And Mail goes on to note, that’s the highest level in two decades. And it’s projected to get worse. Alberta could see unemployment rise to 7.5% in H1.

Most of the positions lost were breadwinner jobs. The province shed 51,000 full-time positions for the year, up notably from Statcan’s initial read of 44,000. 

“The latest figures are also in stark contrast to 2014, when Alberta added 63,7000 positions, more than half of all jobs created in Canada that year,” The Calgary Sun adds, underscore just how sharp the reversal of fortunes has been. 

“Alberta is, in effect, ground zero when it comes to absorbing a commodity price shock,” National Bank said last week. “More than any province, it will take the brunt of the expected drop-off in business investment.”

Right. And that means more hardship ahead for O&G sector employees like Sean O’Reilly, 46, who, until last November, was a senior manager at Enbridge Inc. 

O’Reilly, who spoke to The Globe And Mail, says he’s “embarrased and ashamed”, but with a wife and two small children he may be forced to change career paths and move out of the province.

“Southern Ontario manufacturing looks pretty good right now,” he says. “I just need one job.”

*  *  *

For those who missed it, below are a few excerpts from “The Death Of The Alberta Dream,” by Jason Markusoff as originally published at Macleans

Late last year, Brandon MacKay listed his Kawasaki dirt bike for sale on Kijiji, the online classifieds site. It was the only treat the 25-year-old had given himself in three years living in Fort McMurray. The rest he’d spent on supporting and visiting his wife and kids in Pictou County, N.S. But in crafting the ad for the bike—$4,400 or best offer—MacKay did what any sales agent would advise against: he revealed his desperation to sell. “I lost my job and am in need of money for my wife and kids for Christmas.”

Energy companies are preparing for a grim 2016. Analysts predict budgets will get slashed further, and that more energy firms may have to cut staff, having already laid off thousands. Ongoing oil sands construction projects will continue to wind down with little to replace them, hitting both the residential and commercial real estate sectors hard. For instance, in nearly one-sixth of all the office space in downtown Calgary, the fluorescent lights now shine on empty cubicles, and it’s forecast to get worse. Reports of the symptoms pop up almost daily: more insolvencies, more business for moving trucks and repo crews, even a noticeable uptick in suicides. The Calgary Stampede itself has been forced to lay off staff, as its offseason event bookings dried up. In November, the Alberta unemployment rate came within one-tenth of a percentage point of the national average, the closest it’s been since 1989. Those trend lines are expected to cross over next year, making it more clear to Canadian job-seekers that the Alberta dream is in decline.

The rest of the country isn’t immune from those ominous grinding sounds coming from Canada’s longtime economic engine. Canadian GDP dipped into recession territory in the first half of 2015 on the oil shock, and though the country managed a rebound in the third quarter, Alberta’s troubles—as well as slumps in other oil-rich provinces like Saskatchewan and Newfoundland—have left a gaping wound. The energy sector had long driven Canada’s trade surplus, papering over weakness elsewhere while soaking up large numbers of unemployed and underemployed people from regions like the Maritimes and hard-hit southwestern Ontario.

But even average growth seems a ways off, as troubles keep filtering through the province. In Alberta’s southeast, Medicine Hat drew international acclaim in the spring of 2015 after it became the first city in Canada to eliminate homelessness, having pursued an ambitious five-year agenda to put people into subsidized housing within 10 days of them landing in emergency shelters. After so much progress, Medicine Hat’s Salvation Army shelter is back to averaging 17 clients a night, up about one-third since 2014—too many to promptly find them all affordable housing. Local demand for donated clothing and household items also rose by more than a quarter over the last year, says manager Murray Jaster. But donations slumped too, and he had to reduce staff.

To Jaster’s point, there is much his province used to have that now seems gone. Most noticeable is Alberta’s eroding status as the Promised Land for so many Canadians from other parts of the country. Over the last decade, net interprovincial migration by 18- to 44-year-olds, the key working demographic, swelled Alberta’s population by 200,000, according to a report by a rather envious Business Council of British Columbia. (That province netted fewer than 40,000 over that stretch, while all other provinces were net losers.) The momentum has shifted. While 1,200 more Canadians still moved to the province than left it during the third quarter of 2015, that was the smallest gain since 2010—when the province was recovering from the 2009 oil price collapse—and less than half the average of the last 50 years.

“Seeing that there’s no real light at the end of the tunnel right now, more [companies] are turning to job cuts,” says Wendy Giuffre, the president of Wendy Ellen, a human resources consultancy. “It seems that there’s another wave right now. I think people were kind of hopeful things were going to pick up sooner, but it’s not looking too promising.”

Statistics Canada’s payroll survey shows Alberta shed 63,500 jobs over the year leading up to October. That doesn’t account for lost potential—the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers estimates 40,000 jobs that were expected to be created never materialized.

It’s no secret that Alberta’s economy is closely linked to the peaks and craters of oil prices—nominal GDP (not adjusted for inflation) swings in tandem with crude prices. It’s why Fort McMurray is like a wounded beast these days. MacKay’s neighbour got laid off this fall. “I watched the bank come and take his truck,” he recalls—it was that or not feed the kids. Home prices in November were 20 per cent below last year’s average, with even townhouses and duplexes losing $100,000 in value. According to reports, a number of people who used to regularly donate to the city’s food bank have become clients.

What happens in the oil fields directly affects one of Canada’s largest business cores. Elevator trips to Beaver’s small ninth-floor Calgary office have gotten lonelier. Nearly one-third of the office space in the 32-storey highrise is listed for lease or sublease. The asking rate to rent downtown Calgary’s “Class A” office space is down nearly 42 per cent from last year, the result of “a complete lack of demand,” according to a report by real estate advisers Jones Lang Lasalle. 

The hollowing out of Calgary offices has decimated the corporate lunch crowd. Regulars who would come to Jalapeno’s Mexican Grill three times a week now visit once, or not at all, owner Doug Hernandez says. “We’re not making any money; we’re just floating right now,” he says. “The problem would be when I’m not wearing my lifejacket anymore. Then I’d drown.” 

Much more in the full article here


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1Sk1xMX Tyler Durden

Rand Paul’s New Hampshire Campaign Office Burglarized, Computers Stolen

UPI reports a burglary at Sen. Rand Paul’s New Hampshire campaign office:

Michael Biundo, national adviser for Paul’s campaign, tweeted in the morning about the break-in.

“Going to Iowa today for the final caucus push and now I am dealing with our New Hampshire for .@RandPaul office being broken into,” he wrote, though didn’t specify what, if anything, was taken.

Manchester police confirmed reports of a burglary at the office, but said a full report would not be available until at least Thursday.

Truth in Media had more:

Brandon Ross, a local attorney and volunteer with the Paul campaign, told Truth In Media that other businesses in the same building reported attempted burglaries earlier in the week.

Matt Chisholm, Paul’s New Hampshire communications director, claimed that the items stolen included “four iPads, two laptop computers, two cell phones and some other small electronic devices, including cameras and headphones.” 

Paul’s campaign had not yet responded for a request for comment or context as of time of posting. Will update if they do.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/205IbBe
via IFTTT

Wall Street Economists React To The Fed’s Statement

After the Fed’s statement, one thing was clear: the career economists at the Marriner Eccles building are very confused, admitting to hiking rates for the first time in nine years “even as economic growth slowed late last year“. But more confused are the Wall Street economists who follow the Fed and are expected to interpret what the Fed says, means and hints, especially when said Fed has no clue what is going on, like right now – the same people who a month ago said, for example, predicted that a rate hike was bullish; the same people who blamed the economic slowdown in the winter of 2014/2015 due to China on… snow in the winter.

So while their opinions are utterly worthless, for the record, here is what the economisseds see in today’s 558 words of sheer Fed confusion:

“When it comes to the statement, what’s most obvious is the absence of content, not the presence. Nowhere did Yellen & Co. reference ‘market volatility,’ a euphemism for the global equity declines experienced in 2016….There’s only one thing to learn from this barrel-of-oil-sized hole in the rather terse [Federal Open Market Committee] statement: March depends on job markets (still running strong) and inflation theory (no data, but the Fed believes).”

– Guy LeBas, Janney Montgomery Scott

 

“The first line of the statement leads with ‘labor market conditions improved further even as economic growth slowed late last year,’ a clear reminder of what drives the Fed at this stage in the cycle. Yes, they have to watch market and global developments, but when wages are beginning to accelerate and the Fed expects ‘some additional decline in underutilization of labor resources,’ following ‘strong job gains,’ it is clear that the bar for market turmoil to deflect them from ‘gradual’ tightening has been raised.”

– Ian Shepherdson, Pantheon Macroeconomics

 

“Policy makers are indicating that it is too soon to gauge the impact from the sharp fall in global equity and oil prices and because of that they are not prepared to offer an assessment on the risks to the economic outlook, labor markets and inflation. Clearly by not offering a risk assessment on the outlook the FOMC is indicating that at this time there is a low probability of them raising official rates at the March meeting. ” –

Joseph Carson, AllianceBernstein

 

“The FOMC statement was reworded to signal increased concern about ‘global economic and financial developments,’ but, overall, the tweaks to the statement were limited enough to be consistent with no major change yet to the policy outlook. In the end, decisions will depend on the data and market developments.”

– Jim O’Sullivan, High Frequency Economics

 

” The statement highlighted the potential downside risks from what is transpiring in global financial markets and in many economies around the world….This replaced previously used phrasing stating a belief that the risks to the outlook for economic activity and the labor market were balanced even taking into account domestic and international developments. All in all, the relevant changes to the policy statement tilt in the dovish direction, consistent with our forecast of just two additional tightening moves this year.”

– Joshua Shapiro, MFR Inc.

 

“It seems clear to me that the Fed is shading the economic risk to the downside. I’m reading this a touch more dovishly than the market appears to be. “Big takeaway” is FOMC’s description of slower economic growth in late 2015, near-term inflation remaining low. Statement was “negative” on economic growth, yet “not so much as to signal greater accommodation ahead”

– B. Hunter Hill , SunTrust Robinson Humphrey

 

“We find ourselves in the odd position that the Fed is almost certain to hike if markets stabilize in the next month and half, but might not hike if markets continue to slide”

– Chris Low, FTN

 

Two important changes in statement were acknowledgment that FOMC is “closely monitoring” global economic, financial developments and disappearance of sentence that said FOMC “reasonably confident” inflation will rise to objective.Omission of “reasonably confident” sentence doesn’t mean FOMC thinks it won’t hit inflation target but it not longer wants to “pound the table.” FOMC has backed off a little on how confident it is with regard to inflation and the ability of economy to weather global headwinds

– Ethan Harris, Bank of America

* * *

However, without doubt the best comment of the day was this one:

Source: Dow Jones, Bloomberg


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1noCxIz Tyler Durden

Why Lower Gasoline Prices Are Not Stimulating The Economy

Submitted by Tom McClellan via MCOscillator.com,

Fed officials and financial news reporters are collectively wondering why the economy seems to be slowing down, even though lower oil and gasoline prices ought to be a stimulative factor.  If consumers are spending less of their money on gasoline, then they ought to have more to spend on other stuff, or so goes the reasoning.  So why is it not working? 

The problem is one of magnitude, and most analysts fail to take the time to do the math.  So at the risk of boring you with arithmetic, let’s look at some important numbers, with a bit of back-of-the-envelope math.

The EIA publishes data on consumption for a variety of energy products, including gasoline.  In November 2015 for example (the most recent month for which there are data), Americans consumed gasoline at a rate of 358 million gallons per day.  The 12-month average is 360 million gallons.  That sounds like a really large number, but when you realize that there are roughly 322 million resident Americans, that works out to 1.11 gallons per day for every American. 

 

The chart above shows the trend for that data.  The high prices of just a couple of years ago sent people into dealerships to buy Priuses, Volts, Teslas, and other electrified cars to avoid paying high gasoline prices.  But the falling prices for automobile fuel are making consumers eschew those more efficient choices, and consume more gasoline.  They are also consuming more diesel, which is not part of these computations, but it is nevertheless a real factor. 

Looking at the math, if the price of gasoline drops from $3.00 to $2.00 (round numbers to make the math easier), that means an extra $1.11 in your pocket every day, assuming you are the average man, woman, and child in America. 

If you find a dollar on the sidewalk, pick it up and put it in your pocket, are you going to go out and adjust your spending patterns?  Probably not.  But if you found a dollar on the sidewalk every day for a month, or for several months, maybe you will start supersizing your Happy Meal, buying more Pokemon cards, or making other adjustments to your consumption.  This is the point that former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke made in his famous speech about dropping money from helicopters, a point he borrowed from Milton Friedman. 

Aggregating all of those savings, a $1 drop in gasoline prices amounts to around $10.8 billion of supposed stimulus in the form of consumers keeping more of their own money.  That’s $1 multiplied by an average of 360 million gallons per day, times 30 days in an average month.  Now, $10.8 billion per month is a pretty big number, but it is nowhere near the $85 billion per month that the Fed was pumping into the banking system during QE3, for example.  

Still, $10.8 billion per month ought to do something for stimulus, right?  Yes, of course, but that is unless it gets eaten by monsters.  Mwahh, hah hah!!  The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) estimates that the average price of healthcare premia will rise by 12.56% in 2016, a figure way above the estimate of 5.8% per year as modeled by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for the 2014 to 2024 period. 

The National Conference of State Legislatures estimates a US-wide cost for a “Silver” plan medical insurance for a 40-year-old non-smoker at $314 for 2015.  So if we apply a 12.56% growth rate from RWJF, that amounts to a jump to $353, or $39/month.  That pretty well eats up the $1.11 per day savings on gasoline. 

Ergo, the stimulus of lower gasoline prices has been eaten by monsters. 

One other monster eating the gasoline stimulus is that the federal government is now soaking up 18.1% of GDP in the form of federal taxes.  Going above 18% has a proven track record of pushing the U.S. into a recession.  So the bottom line is that whatever stimuli the lower prices of gasoline are giving us are getting swallowed by darker forces.  And the magnitude of the savings is just not enough to outweigh those stronger forces.  It would not even be enough if gasoline was free.  And that’s the big takeaway message. 


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1noyv2O Tyler Durden