Liberty Links 1/29/16

Below are links to some of the more interesting and important reads I came across today, but will not be publishing on in detail.

Chicago Police Deliberately Sabotaging Recording Devices (Must read of the day, Reason)

Ted Cruz Abandons Criminal Justice Reform on His Way to the White House (The guy has zero principles, a pure opportunist, Reason)

Four Billionaire Donors Help Cruz Rise in GOP Bid (Associated Press)

Ha Ha: Hillary Clinton’s Top Financial Supporter Now Controls “The Onion” (The Intercept)

Paul Krugman Unironically Anoints Himself Arbiter of “Seriousness”: Only Clinton Supporters Eligible (The Intercept)

continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/1RRBqhE
via IFTTT

Meanwhile In Canada, A Real Estate Bargain Emerges…

We’ve long known that Canada, like Sweden and Denmark, is sitting on a giant housing bubble.

Indeed we took a close look at the issue back in March of last year and have revisited in on several occasions since. Put simply, the divergence between crude prices and the country’s housing market simply isn’t sustainable a you can see from the following chart:

And while the boom is rapidly turning to bust in places like Calgary, things are humming right along in Waterloo, where Napoleon was defeated in 1815. No, wait – wrong Waterloo. This is Waterloo, Ontario, a town of 140,000 that’s being billed as “Canada’s Silicon Valley.”

As Bloomberg reports, “the town revolves around two universities and a burgeoning technology sector that’s attracted companies such as Google Inc. and dozens of startups.” Here’s a look inside the Kitchener-Waterloo Google office:

The buzz has created a “land grab” and now, condos are renting for nearly C$2,000 per month while one-bedroom units are selling for more than a quarter of a million dollars.

Vacancy rates are at 13-year lows and Google’s country manager for Canada calls the city “lightning in a bottle.”

If that sounds like a bubble to you, you’d be correct but some investors don’t see it that way.

Take Bill Ring for instance, head of operations for a property management company who Bloomberg notes drove two hours to Toronto to attend a rowdy sales pitch for condos in Waterloo put on by a Bay Street trader turned-tech investor, turned-real estate mogul. “Students are coming in and need a place to live, tech companies are opening. It’ll all drive the value up,” he says. “I don’t want to invest in stocks because they’re crazy and real estate is a solid, safe investment.

Yes, Bill wants a “solid, safe investment” that isn’t “crazy.”

Like Canadian real estate.

Which definitely isn’t a bubble.

After all, if the housing market in Canada were overheating, you wouldn’t be able to get “bargains” like the listing shown below from Vancouver.

Good luck Bill.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1P2Geel Tyler Durden

Weekend Reading: Mental Floss

Submitted by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

Over the last couple of week’s most of the weekend reading list has been attributed to the market’s stumble since the beginning of this year. Importantly, as we rapidly head into January’s close, there seems to be little to reverse the negative tide sweeping through the market.

As I wrote earlier this week, this isn’t a good thing.

“It would seem logical that a weak performance in January would lead to some recovery in February. Markets are oversold, sentiment is bearish and February is still within the seasonally strong 6-months of the year. Makes sense.

 

Unfortunately, the historical data suggests that this will likely not be the case. The chart below is the historical point gain/loss for January and February back to 1957. Since 1957, there have been 20 January months that have posted negative returns or 33% of the time.”

SP500-Jan-Fed-Loss-Gain-012616

“February has followed those 20 losing January months by posting gains 5-times and declining 14-times. In other words, with January likely to close out the month in negative territory, there is a 70% chance that February will decline also.

 

The high degree of risk of further declines in February would likely result in a confirmation of the bear market. This is not a market to be trifled with. Caution is advised.”

In other words, there is a real probability that if the markets don’t get a lift between now and the end of the month, February could be the beginning of a technical bear market decline.

But were could that lift come from? The first is month-end window dressing by fund managers after a brutal start to the new year. After much liquidation, fund managers will need to rebalance holdings.

The second is the potential for Central Banks to intervene which could embolden the bulls as further support could temporarily delay the onset of a bear market and recession. Note: I said temporarily. Pulling forward future consumption is not a long-term solution to organic economic growth. 

Not to be disappointed, the BOJ announced a move into NEGATIVE interest rate territory to try and boost economic growth in Japan. (Interestingly, however, was the lack of increase in QE.) The announcement was a shock to the markets as the BOJ had just stated last week that negative interest rates were not being considered. Here are some early takes on the BOJ’s move:

  • World shares heat up as Bank of Japan goes sub-zero (Reuters)
  • Stocks Rally With Bonds as BOJ Ends Grim January on High Note (BBG)
  • Japan Follows Europe Into Negative Interest Rate Territory (WSJ)
  • BOJ Move Resulting In Currency Wars & Global Slowdown (ZeroHedge)

That move, on top of the latest FOMC meeting, more market turmoil and bond yields flip-flopping around 2%, has made this a most interesting week. Here are some of the things I am reading this weekend.


1) Why Junk Bonds Will Sink Stocks Further by Yves Smith via Naked Capitalism

“Investment lore is full of sayings as to how the bond markets can send false positives about lousy prospects for the real economy and the stock market. However, as Wolf sets forth below, a new Moody’s article makes a compelling case as to why the high risk spreads in the junk bond market bode ill for the stock market.”

 

US-high-yield-spreads-2007-2016-01-21

But Also Read:  Credit Cycle In Full Collapse Mode by Myrmikan Research

And Read: We Should Be Terrified By Junk Bonds by Rana Foroohar via Time

2) If It’s A Bear Market, It Ain’t Over by Joe Calhoun via Alhambra Partners

“The real enemy of investors is not these fairly routine 10 or 20% downturns. The real enemy is the bear market that is associated with a recession or crisis, the one that knocks your equity block down by 40 or 50%. And actually it isn’t even the depth that is the real enemy. For most investors the enemy is time.”

But Also Read: El-Erian: Day Of Reckoning Coming by Mohamed El-Erian via CNBC

 

Opposing View: Don’t Do Anything, Just Stand There by Wade Slome via Investing Caffeine

And Also: What Investors Shouldn’t Do In A Bear Market by Peter Hodson via Financial Post

3) 34 Charts: This Time Is Different by Will Ortel via CFA Institute

“In October, I asked whether the market could have its cake and eat it too. The hope was for persistent low interest rates and consistently appreciating securities.

Somebody seems to have remembered cake doesn’t work that way.

 

According to some, this buying opportunity is brought to you by the letter “C”: China, commodities, and the now questionably healthy consumer. Reaching towards risk feels sensible. It’s been nearly 10 years since it wasn’t.

 

But today, growth, like certainty, is hard to come by. We hear the word “recession” again. There have been more Google searches for the phrase “sell stocks” this month than at any time since October 2008. And January is not over.

 

To some strategists, the writing is on the wall. I wrote recently that anyone who says they know exactly what will happen is wrong, cheating, or both. I still think that. So before getting into what I see, I want to tell you what to do: your homework. Now is the time to distinguish yourself as an investor. So as you read through everything below, remember: I’ll be disappointed if you wind up agreeing with everything I say.”

zero-hedge-012816

Also Read: Why Dip Buyers Will Get Clobbered by David Stockman via Contra Corner

Watch: Recession Fears Grow Louder by Heather Long via CNN Money

4) The Time To Sell Has Passed by Doug Kass via Yahoo Finance

“The time to sell has likely passed. Those opportunities had been in place since last spring and were the outgrowth of a deteriorating fundamental and technical backdrop that many investors ignored.

 

But while I have a more-constructive market view for the short term my confidence level isn’t high. In a fragile-growth setting, too much can upset the apple cart.”

Also Read: Sellers Are Still In Control by Michael Kahn via Barron’s

Further Read: It Wasn’t Oil, China Or The Fed by James Juliand via RTW

5) Feldstein: Let Markets Fall, Fed Should Hike Rates by Greg Robb via Market Watch

“In an interview with MarketWatch, Feldstein said stocks are overvalued. Any signal from the U.S. central bank that it may pause from its plans to continue raising interest rates would only create the impression that there is a “Fed put” on the market. A put is an option that protects an investor from losses.”

But Also Read: The Fed Doesn’t Understand Liquidity by Louis Woodhill via Real Clear Markets

And: Did The Fed Make A Huge Mistake? by Matt O’Brien via WaPo


MUST READS


“I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people” – Sir Issac Newton


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1nDCfyd Tyler Durden

Hillary’s Emails Were Top Secret, Melissa Click Gets Community Service, Kicking Richard Dawkins Out of the Club: P.M. Links

  • ClintonMizzou Professor Melissa Click will serve 20 hours of community service in lieu of jail time. That seems fair.
  • Atheist Richard Dawkins was banished from a conference for skeptics. His crime? Sending a tweet that made fun of feminists. (He later deleted it.)
  • Amherst College has gotten rid of its problematic mascot, “Lord Jeff.” But Lord Jeff is Jeffrey Amherst—and the college is still named after him, National Review points out.
  • Once again, yes, Hillary Clinton shared “top secret” emails.
  • Watch the full footage of the FBI shooting one of the people involved in the Oregon standoff.
  • From The Onion: “Dazed Marco Rubio Wakes Up in Koch Compound to Find Cold Metal Device Installed Behind Ear.”
  • Tucker Carlson’s take on the Trump phenomenon is a must-read. (Okay, take what this former Daily Caller staffer says with a gain of salt. But it contains this gem: “It’s true you have better hair than I do,” Trump said matter-of-factly. “But I get more pussy than you do.”)

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1PnSl9m
via IFTTT

WTF Just Happened Here?

Early in the day, VIX spiked ‘oddly’ and instanly broke the options market

 

Prompting the start of an epic ramp in stocks:

 

Which was all good and fine, until the last minute of the US day-session today, when, as a follow up question, we have just this to ask: WTF just happened here?

 

Here is Central Bank XYZ’s VIX fat finger, zoomed in.

When Citi warned earlier to “Be Prepared For All Sorts Of Insanity Today“, it wasn’t kidding.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1ntEkfz Tyler Durden

Despite What Her Campaign Wants You to Believe, Hillary Clinton Did Send Top Secret Emails on Her Homebrew Server

Hillary Clinton’s campaign has repeatedly pushed back on the idea that any of the emails she sent using her personal email system while serving as Secretary of State were classified top secret.

Back in November, for example, campaign spokesperson Brian Fallon tweeted out a link to a Politico report suggesting that early findings that some of her emails contained highly classified material were wrong. Maybe Fallon was just sharing, not endorsing, and the exclamation points he included in his tweet were just there to demonstrate his surprise at the story.

In any case, it turns out that the report was wrong, and Clinton did indeed send at least 22 emails classified as top secret, according to an Associated Press report this afternoon.

These emails were classified as “special access programs,” according to Politico, which means they were compartmentalized within the top secret designation; even top secret clearance wouldn’t necessarily be enough to get someone access to these communications.

The State Department has slowly making Clinton’s emails public over the last few months, following a court order, but not complying with it fully: A federal judge had ordered the emails to be completely released by the end of today, but instead, only about 1,000 of the 9,000 remaining pages of email will be released later tonight.

So far, about 1,300 of Clinton’s emails have been labeled classified at some level. Today was the first time, however, that any had been confirmed to be classified top secret. So far, classified emails have been redacted for release. The top secret emails revealed today won’t be released in any way; they’ll simply be withheld.

On the campaign trail, both Clinton and her team have sought to downplay the issue and her responsibility for the matter.  “I did not send classified material, and I did not receive any material that was marked or designated classified,” she said. Fallon has defended Clinton by saying “was, at worst, the passive recipient of unwitting information that subsequently became deemed as classified.”

That remains to be seen. As the Associated Press reports today, the State Department “wouldn’t disclose if any of the documents reflected information that was classified at the time of transmission, but indicated that the agency’s Diplomatic Security and Intelligence and Research bureaus have begun looking into that question.”

And whether or not the emails were marked as classified is not the entire issue. As a Reuters report noted in August, “the government’s standard nondisclosure agreement warns people authorized to handle classified information that it may not be marked that way and that it may come in oral form.” 

What continues to be most revealing about this story is not the particular contents of any of the emails, but the way that Clinton and her team have handled it.

At virtually every turn, she and her campaign staffers have misled and dissembled, repeatedly making statements that later turn out to be false. In general, her attitude is one of disdain and dismissiveness, as if transparency and truthfulness about her unorthodox decision to conduct her State Department email business exclusively on a homebrew email server was unnecessary, or beneath her. She has displayed both a willful disregard for the truth and as a generalized resistance to public scrutiny and oversight. And that may tell us more about her, and what kind of president she might be, than any email she’s sent.  

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1PZh1kG
via IFTTT

Bank of Japan Policy Panic Unleashes Stock, Bond Buying Pandemonium

Some soothing month-end meditation…

 

So let's start with today's idiocy… US equities driven by fundamentals!!

  • *S&P 500 EXTENDS GAIN TO 2.1%, HEADED FOR BEST DAY SINCE SEPT.8

 

But here is some context for January's moves…

For China…

 

Worst ever…

 

For US markets – apart from 2009's collapse, this is the worst January ever…

 

But bonds had a great one!!

This is Gold's 3rd January up in a row (and 8th of the last 11 years)…

 

Across asset-classes, Bonds & Bullion did well, stocks and crude not so much…

 

Small Caps underperformed while the S&P was the least bad performer…

 

FANTAsy stocks are all down aside from FB – with TSLA and NFLX down over 20%…

 

Bond yields are down across the curve… The belly (5Y and 7Y yield) outperformed – down a stunning 40-45bps on the month…

 

So not an awsesome month but hey… what a week right!!

*  *  *

On the week…even Nasdaq managed to get green despite AAPL and AMZN collapse…

 

Bonds & Stocks were bid…

 

With Treasury yields down 12-15bps on the week (though 30Y oddly underperformed)

 

The USDollar Index soared back to unchanged on the week after BoJ's idiocy…

 

Commodities all gained on the week with crude and copper best…

 

Finally today…

Total panic buying…

 

Yeah this really happened!!! 3000 points of swing in Nikkei 225

 

Creating a giant squeeze in US equities…

 

Well it is Friday after all…

 

Charts: Bloomberg

Bonus Chart: An awkward reality check…


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1OVboGE Tyler Durden

The BoJ “Gift” Is A One Day Reprieve – Use It Wisely

Via Scotiabank's Guy Haselmann,

By surprising markets with a move to a negative deposit rate, the Bank of Japan gave investors temporary reprieve, providing a much needed opportunity to pare portfolio risk at better prices.  Unfortunately, the improvement in financial asset prices will be short-lived; except, of course, for long-maturity Treasuries.

  • As I wrote on January 4th, “Investors should be careful not underestimating just how far long-maturity Treasury yields can fall”.  These conditions still exist. 

The BoJ action to drop its deposit rate from 0% to -0.10% will likely prove to be more symbolic than impactful.  However, it is understandable why the BoJ wanted to take action. In January, the TOPIX was down 10% and the traded-weighted Yen appreciated by 3.5%.  Currency strength and the fall in oil prices conspired to push Japan’s preferred inflation measure back into deflation.  However, if Japan (which only strips out food) stripped out energy from its measure (like other countries do), then its inflation measure would be above 1%.

The BoJ issued a highly informative and clear 4-page explanation of its action (China could use this clarity as an example of effective communication).  It introduced a three-tiered system for rates, similar to that used in some European countries. The BoJ made it clear that the negative rate is not applied to outstanding balances of current accounts, but rather applied only to marginal increases in current account balances.

Since the money base is growing at an annual pace of 80 trillion yen, outstanding balances of current accounts will increase on an aggregate basis.  However, in order to limit harm to earnings of financial institutions from the negative deposit rate, the BoJ will increase the tier thresholds accordingly.  In other words, the current balance to which thezero interest rate will be applied will increase, so that the threshold to which a negative interest is applied “will remain at adequate levels”.

When a central bank hits the 0% lower bound in rates, the impact of any further unconventional easing actions is felt via a weaker currency. Therefore, the diverging policy actions between the hiking Fed and the easing BOJ and ECB, means that the upward pressure on the USD versus the Euro and Yen will continue.  The effect of a stronger dollar iscounter to the perceived and kneejerk market euphoria that arose today; and which seem to arise during easing actions.  A stronger USD will act like a magnet for global deflationary forces.  Investors beware.  

A strengthening USD has numerous consequences. The Yuan‘s peg to the USD has certainly damaged China’s competitiveness.  The trade-weighted Yuan has dropped by over 25% during the past three years.  Moreover, Chinese wages have risen considerably in the past decade, further lowering their competitiveness.  China is no longer viewed as the world’s low-cost producer.  China is currently trying to find the tricky balance between finding new sources of growth, remaining competitive, stabilizing financial markets, and limiting capital flight.

The move by the BoJ makes this balance more difficult. It increases the pressure on China to devalue its currency further.  However, with China’s rise as the world’s second largest economy and its acceptance into the IMF SDR basket, its global responsibility has escalated accordingly.   Currency devaluation by China (or by Japan for that matter) steals growth from the rest of the world; such action is clearly non-beneficial to US risk assets.

  • A strengthening US dollar has already damaged US corporate earnings – around 50% of S&P 500 earning comes from overseas (and global trade has dropped ominously).

China and Emerging economies were growing above 10% in 2010, but are growing at less than 4%.  Clearly, the global economy has lost an important engine of growth.  Moreover, the world has never been more indebted and the developed world demographics are simply terrible. For several years, China’s debt has been growing at the unsustainable rate of over 2 times its GDP.  Enormous indebtedness has borrowed too much from the future. High indebtedness and low rates globally means there is far less fiscal slack or monetary ammunition with which to respond.

The savings rate in China is 40% to 50%.  This is partially due to a lack of confidence in the future, but mainly due to China’s very poor retirement and health care programs. After several decades of the one-child policy, many Chinese are not just trying to save for their own retirements, and potential future health care costs, but are saving for two sets of grandparents who did not receive the benefits of recent wage hikes.

Low interest rates initially cause investors to desperately search for yield.  However, eventually risk assets become too mispriced (and thus skewed to the downside).  When this occurs, portfolio preferences switch to cash alternative or ‘return of capital’ strategies.  During such an environment, the pressure on savers to save more to reach retirement goals intensifies.  If, for example, interest rates fall from 4% to 3%, an investor would have to increase savings by more than 20% each year to reach the same goal over 30 years.

I maintain that central banks are miscalculating the non-linear cost-benefit equation of their policy actions.  Prudent investors should use today’s month-end BoJ gift to pare portfolio risks and to buy long-dated Treasuries.

“The change, it had to come / We knew it all along / We were liberated from the fold, that’s all…” – The Who


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/20bRcZx Tyler Durden

Former Citigroup Trader Explains How Wall Street Came to Own the Clintons and the Democratic Party

Screen Shot 2015-08-31 at 2.27.14 PM

Former FX trader at Citigroup, Chris Arnade, just penned a poignant and entertaining Op-ed at The Guardian detailing how Wall Street came to own the Democratic Party via the Clintons over the course of his career. While anyone reading this already knows how completely bought and paid for the Clintons are by the big financial interests, the article provides some interesting anecdotes as well as a classic quote about a young Larry Summers.

Here are some choice excerpts from the piece:

I owe almost my entire Wall Street career to the Clintons. I am not alone; most bankers owe their careers, and their wealth, to them. Over the last 25 years they – with the Clintons it is never just Bill or Hillary – implemented policies that placed Wall Street at the center of the Democratic economic agenda, turning it from a party against Wall Street to a party of Wall Street.

That is why when I recently went to see Hillary Clinton campaign for president and speak about reforming Wall Street I was skeptical. What I heard hasn’t changed that skepticism. The policies she offers are mid-course corrections. In the Clintons’ world, Wall Street stays at the center, economically and politically. Given Wall Street’s power and influence, that is a dangerous place to leave them.

continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/1P2yzg2
via IFTTT