If St. Louis Fed’s James Bullard is the Fed’s hawk who infamously flipped to uberdove several months ago, than Boston Fed’s Eric Rosengren has become his mirror image: a former dove who has become increasingly hawkish, and who is warning that keeping rates low for long is “not without risks.” Yet, in a speech overnight at the Shanghai Advanced Institute of Finance, Beijing, China titled “Observations on Financial Stability Concerns for Monetary Policymakers“, Rosengren voiced the same concerns about a building asset bubble as Bullard did last Friday just before Yellen’s speech, when he said that “I think we are on the high side of fairly valued, I could see the process getting away from us, maybe tech stocks, maybe others.”
Rosengren started off cautiously with a warning that Fed’s mandated goals – stable prices and maximum sustainable employment – are likely to be achieved relatively soon, and “keeping interest rates low for a long time is not without risks.” As a result, important questions confront monetary policymakers in the United States, including when and how quickly to continue normalizing interest rates.
He then took his warnings up a notch, warning that central banks must think about attaining their mandates “not only at the current time, but also through time”, weighing the benefits of low interest rates now against the potential costs in the future of possibly spurring instability.
However, unlike Bullard who focused on tech stocks as indicative of bubbly forthiness, Rosengren noted that in the United States, a potential side effect of very low interest rates has been rapid price appreciation in the commercial real estate sector, adding that if the U.S. economy were to weaken, and underlying occupancy rates and rents became less favorable, a large decline in commercial real estate collateral values could lead to losses for banks. This scenario, while not his prediction, would have downstream effects on credit availability to firms and households.
Rosengren warned that “investors may be engaged in
excessive risk-taking” in the commercial property sector, which if coupled with an economic shock would set
off events that threaten financial stability.
He toned his earning back modestly saying that “in my view, commercial real estate is, by itself, unlikely to trigger financial stability problems.However, he admitted that “should prevailing economic conditions change in response to a large negative economic shock, commercial real estate prices could decline relatively quickly, leading to large losses at leveraged firms.”
Firms and households faced with long periods of low returns may react by “reaching for yield” – buying riskier assets than one would otherwise in order to archive a desired profit or savings goal, Rosengren said. “Should a large negative shock occur, firms and households would be exposed to greater losses through their holdings of riskier assets than they would be if they were not reaching for yield.”
Rosengren said that because commercial real estate debt is widely held by depository institutions, commercial real estate losses could erode banks’ capital ratios and lead to a contraction of credit availability for firms and households – similar to the credit crunch experience in the early 1990s.
As a result, revaluation of commercial real estate during a downturn could make a recession worse than if Fed had raised rates more rapidly. “Somewhat faster move to rate normalization” may delay how quickly Fed reaches dual mandate, yet it could also reduce risk of a “larger divergence” from mandate in next downturn
“The financial stability concerns that could arise from a low interest rate policy continuing for an extended period of time should be considered in conjunction with how best to achieve” the central bank’s full employment and price stability goals, “now and over time,” Rosengren concluded.
Putting all of the above in one simple chart, here is what keeps Rosengren up at night:
Just like Bullard’s warning, we expect Rosengren’s cautious forecast about a worst case scenario to be promptly ignored by Janet Yellen.
* * *
His entire presentation is below
via http://ift.tt/2bVuYWG Tyler Durden