The Bipartisan Urge to Suppress Dissent: New at Reason

The University of California at Berkeley’s inhospitality to conservative speakers, the subject of a federal lawsuit filed on Monday, prompted a Twitter rebuke from President Trump a few months ago. Yet his administration seems determined to demonstrate that suppression of opposing views is a bipartisan impulse, writes Jacob Sullum.

After the Milo melee in February, Trump suggested on Twitter that Berkeley risks losing federal funds if it “does not allow free speech.” But if the president were sincerely committed to protecting First Amendment rights, notes Sullum, he would issue similar warnings to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which recently demanded that Twitter reveal the identity of a DHS gadfly, and the Justice Department, which is considering criminal charges against people who share classified information leaked by others.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2q5IdK0
via IFTTT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.