Another Central Bank Throws In The Towel: Czech National Bank Ends Currency Cap, Floats Koruna

Four months ago we showed that according to 6 month EURCZK forwards – driven by a recent surge in Czech inflation – the market was convinced the Czech central bank would end its Koruna peg to the Euro some time before the summer.

As ING stated at the time, “It shows that the market is positioning against the CNB floor more intensively, as accelerating inflation is increasing the odds of the approaching exit. The Dutch bank said it expected the currency regime to be scrapped around April or May, with annual inflation forecast to climb from 1.5 per cent to 1.9 per cent in December – close to the central bank’s 2 per cent target.

“If the intensity of interventions saw during the first days in January continues in the first quarter of 2017, total interventions in the quarter might easily overcome the whole 2016-levels”, he added.

* * *

Moments ago all those traders who bet heavily on an end to the currency peg were rewarded when the Czech National Bank announced that just like the SNB over two years earlier, it ended its regime limiting koruna appreciation, in the process setting in motion one of this year’s biggest currency trades which according to Bloomberg has attracted as much as $65 billion in estimated capital. The announcement caught some by surprise as it came during a non-rate setting meeting, diverging from the original view of it being done at a scheduled monetary policy meeting in May

In anticipation of the peg’s end, investors betting on koruna gains had poured into Czech assets, boosting foreign capital inflows in multiples of the levels normally seen in the country’s balance of payments. But, as Bloomberg adds, at least some of the speculative capital fled the koruna after the central bank stopped providing guidance at the end of March on the likely timing of the exit. The koruna has since shown volatility not seen in years.

The central bank’s board voted to exit the Swiss-inspired intervention regime at a meeting in Prague on Thursday, removing a policy that kept the koruna weaker than 27 per euro for more than three years. The decision, announced in a statement on the bank’s website, came a week after its pledge to keep the one-sided peg in place expired in March. It triggered moves sending the koruna both above and below the level of the cap.

 “The CNB stands ready to use its instruments to mitigate potential excessive exchange rate fluctuations if needed,” the bank said in the statement. The monetary authority will hold a news conference at 2:15 p.m. in Prague.

The seven-member monetary-policy panel abandoned the limit in response to rising inflation and ahead of the ECB scaling down its own unconventional stimulus. As Bloomberg notes, the Czech decision highlights a diverging approach to resurgent inflation in central Europe’s economies, with Hungary continuing easing without touching its benchmark rate and Poland forecasting stable borrowing costs in the coming quarters. The Czechs originally imposed the cap in 2013 to avert deflation.

According to the latest official data, the central bank bought €47.8 billion ($51.3 billion) in the four years through January to prevent the koruna from gaining beyond the limit. Adjusted for natural inflows seen in the balance of payments, the overall speculative position was about 50 billion euros to 60 billion euros as of March. ING Groep NV puts the intervention volume at about 36 billion euros so far this year.

Ironically, central bankers had cautioned that the accumulated speculative position is so large that investors hoping for a quick payoff from koruna appreciation may struggle to find counterparties for their positions in the currency after the exchange-rate limit is removed. The koruna swung between 26.81 per euro and 27.17 per euro, trading at 26.90 as of 12:36 p.m. in Prague.

Indeed, as shown in the chart below, the initial response to the peg removal has been relatively modest.

Not so much other Czech assets, however, as Czech bonds slumped, with shorter maturities leading declines:

  • 2-year yield +20bps to minus 0.18%, highest in 8 months
  • 10-year yield +8bps to 0.91%

Elsewhere in central Europe, in reaction to the Czech central bank announcement, the Polish zloty gained 0.1% to 4.2282 per euro and Hungarian forint appreciates 0.2% to 309.72/Eur.

Governor Jiri Rusnok said after the March 30 policy meeting that the bank will be ready to mitigate excessive koruna swings after the exit. But he also said earlier in March that policy makers won’t be “overly sensitive” to initial swings, which could be in either direction, and will let the market find a new equilibrium.

After the initial calm, we expect the EURCZK to drift steadily lower as market forces normalize.

In the aftermath of the announcement, Nomura said it sees the Czech central bank intervening only if EUR/CZK gets well below 25, or on the upside if going over 27.5. He added that the central bank is looking for a monetary tightening and wants a currency rally, and “if not, they will have to start hiking rates later in the year.”

via http://ift.tt/2oMtkvE Tyler Durden

Global Stocks Rebound From Overnight Lows, On Edge Ahead Of Trump-Xi Meeting

S&P futures are little changed at 6am ET, trading at 2347.55 and paring an earlier 0.4 percent drop, on the back of the USDJPY ramp which for the second day in a row has emerged alongside the European open, just as the key 110 support level appears in danger, soothing concerns about the Fed’s balance sheet reduction and “some” Fed officials warning that stocks have gotten expensive.

The S&P plunged in the last 90 minutes of trading on Wednesday led by banks and energy companies. While Asian stocks fall in early trading, European bourses rebounded from session lows alongside the S&P and USDJPY. In Europe, media, bank and insurers lead the decline but have since cut their losses as the market’s attention shifts to the upcoming summit between Trump and Xi.

Ahead of Mar-A-Lago meeting, central banks remained the dominant theme for markets on Thursday, with traders troubled by the prospect of a shrinking Fed balance sheet and the euro briefly tumbling then recouping much of its losses after Mario Draghi reaffirmed ECB monetary policy. Specifically, the ECB’s President warned Thursday that it was too early to reduce the bank’s massive monetary stimulus, despite signs of strength in the eurozone economy, and pushed back against suggestions that the ECB might raise interest rates soon. Top ECB officials have sent out mixed messages in recent days on whether the central bank is ready to wind down sweeping stimulus measures such as its EUR2.3 trillion ($2.5 trillion) bond-purchase program and subzero interest rates. As a result, market expectations for an ECB rate hike in one year have declined sharply over the past two weeks.

Investor expectations that the ECB could raise the cost of borrowing as early as January 2018 had increased after Draghi’s March 9 press conference. Governing Council members from Austria’s Ewald Nowotny to the Netherlands’ Klaas Knot and Italy’s Ignazio Visco, as well as Executive Board member Benoit Coeure, had voiced to different degrees openness to a change in sequencing.

As has often been the case, Draghi’s commentary was quickly defused by comments from the Bundesbank’s own Jens Weidmann who said “given the prospect of a continuous, robust economic recovery in the euro area and an increase in price pressure, the discussion on when the Governing Council should consider monetary policy normalization and how it could adjust its communication accordingly in advance is legitimate.”

Weidmann adds that “there is agreement within the Governing Council that an expansive monetary policy stance is currently appropriate” yet one can “be of different opinions about the correct degree of monetary policy expansion. I could have imagined a less expansive monetary policy, especially as many economic indicators are developing positively.”

The currency impact was as follows:

Europe’s Stoxx 600 Index headed for its first retreat in three days as S&P 500 futures steadied. Treasury yields pared some of Wednesday’s drop, which was triggered by the Fed’s warning it would reduce its balance sheet before year end, damping the need for interest-rate hikes.

As Bloomberg notes, the Fed minutes did little to alter market views on the bank’s assessment of the economy, but the discussion on shrinking the $4.5 trillion balance sheet later this year underscored prospects for a drop in global liquidity. The message once again contrasted with that of the central bank in Europe, where Draghi said on Thursday “continued support for demand remains key.”

“Most portfolio managers think equities are the most overbought in 20 years and so anything that creates some kind of concern, well, it is an excuse to take profits,” said Pictet Asset Management’s chief strategist Luca Paolini. He was referring to minutes of the Fed’s last meeting that showed most of the U.S. central bank’s policymakers thought it should begin trimming its $4.5 trillion balance sheet later this year, earlier than many had expected.

Some Fed members also “viewed equity prices as quite high relative to standard valuation measures,” a rare comment on asset levels that also caught investors off guard.

“If near-zero rates and central bank buying of bonds have been the fundamental driver of global capital towards higher-yielding assets, then reversing both parts of this can’t be helpful,” Kit Juckes, a global strategist at Societie Generale, wrote in a note. “Which is how markets have reacted overnight.”

Broader sentiment had also been bruised overnight when U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Paul Ryan said there was no consensus on tax reform and it would take longer to accomplish than healthcare.

Markets have risen in recent months in part on speculation fiscal stimulus would boost U.S. growth and inflation. “Trump’s agenda is falling to pieces,” said Pictet’s Paolini. “And that is probably the main concern (for stock market investors).”

The Stoxx Europe 600 Index fell 0.2 percent after closing little changed on Wednesday. Futures on the S&P 500 were modestly in the green adter declining 0.4% earlier in the session.

The whiplash in sentiment saw Japan’s Nikkei hit its lowest since early December.  Australia’s index also lost 0.5 percent. Shanghai .SSEC made marginal gains as a private survey of China’s service sector showed activity expanded at its slowest pace in six months in March.

“We were hit by a bucket of cold water,” said Norihiro Fujito, senior investment strategist at Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities. “Signs that the Fed could pare its balance sheet are shocking enough, but the mood was exacerbated as the Fed touched upon stock valuations, which is very rare.”

Today the focus turns to President Trump’s two-day meeting with China President Xi Jingping at Trump’s estate in Florida. There don’t appear to be any scheduled press conferences just yet but it’s worth keeping an eye on the headlines as the next two days progress. Clearly North Korea will be a subject near to the top of the agenda. Importantly though the meeting is the start of a new China-US bilateral relationship so the rhetoric which follows from the leaders will be closely scrutinised and debated one would imagine.

Topping the agenda at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida will be whether he makes good on his threat to use U.S.-China trade ties to pressure Beijing to do more to rein in its nuclear-armed neighbor North Korea. Nerves were not helped when U.S. Pacific Fleet Commander Admiral Scott Swift said any decision on a pre-emptive attack against North Korea would be up to Trump.

Investors also remain focused on health care and tax policy in Washington, with House Speaker Paul Ryan saying the chances for a vote on a revised repeal of Obamacare this week were dwindling. Ryan also said tax reform could take longer, Reuters reported.

The Bloomberg Dollar Index returned to gains as gold and oil pared declines and the euro was little changed.

Initial jobless claims data due.

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 futures little changed at 2,346.00
  • STOXX Europe 600 down 0.5% to 378.30
  • MXAP down 0.8% to 146.21
  • MXAPJ down 0.7% to 479.56
  • Nikkei down 1.4% to 18,597.06
  • Topix down 1.6% to 1,480.18
  • Hang Seng Index down 0.5% to 24,273.72
  • Shanghai Composite up 0.3% to 3,281.01
  • Sensex down 0.4% to 29,865.57
  • Australia S&P/ASX 200 down 0.3% to 5,856.29
  • Kospi down 0.4% to 2,152.75
  • German 10Y yield fell 0.5 bps to 0.253%
  • Euro down 0.09% to 1.0653 per US$
  • Brent Futures unchanged at $54.36/bbl
  • Italian 10Y yield fell 0.5 bps to 1.976%
  • Spanish 10Y yield rose 2.4 bps to 1.644%
  • Gold spot down 0.1% to $1,254.65
  • U.S. Dollar Index little changed at 100.58

Top Overnight News

  • Unilever Revamps to Protect Independence After Kraft Bid
  • It’s Fed Versus Market as Traders Bet Balance Sheet Slows Hiking
  • Cohn Said to Back Wall Street Split of Lending, Investment Banks
  • House Speaker Ryan Meets With Finance Executives at Capitol
  • Trump’s Tax Overhaul Keeps Congress Waiting as Questions Pile Up
  • Trump Warns Syria Poison Gas Attack Goes ‘Beyond Red Lines’
  • Deutsche Bank Said Near Full Takeup for $8.5 Billion Offer
  • Euro Declines as Draghi Sees No Need for ECB to Change Course
  • BlackRock Is ‘Tactically Adding’ to South African Bond Holdings
  • HNA Said to Be in Advanced Talks for $1 Billion CWT Takeover
  • Costco March Comp. Sales Beat Estimates
  • Gartner Sees Higher Mobile Device Spending on Chinese Upgrades
  • Ford to Introduce Two New Electric Vehicles to China
  • GM India Says Continues to Progress Toward Sale of Halol Plant
  • Barrick Says Shandong to Buy 50% of Veladero Mine for $960m
  • Google Invests in INDIGO Undersea Cable in Southeast Asia

Asia equity markets traded negative following a similar downbeat US close amid weakness in the energy sector and in the wake of the Fed minutes, which showed that the Fed discussed normalization of the balance sheet and that some officials viewed stock prices as quite high. ASX 200 (-0.5%) suffered from losses in the financial sector, while Nikkei 225 (-1.4%) was the laggard in the region on JPY strength as USD/JPY failed to maintain 111.00. Hang Seng (-0.7%) and Shanghai Comp. (+0.1%) were mixed as participants digest the latest Chinese Caixin Services and Composite PMI figures which printed at 6-month lows, but remained in expansionary territory. 10yr JGBs traded marginally higher amid a subdued risk tone in stocks, while today’s enhanced liquidity auction super-long JGBs drew greater interest with the b/c increasing from prior. Chinese Caixin Services PMI (Mar) 52.2 (Prey. 52.6); 6-month low. (Newswires) Chinese Caixin Composite PMI (Mar) 52.1 (Prey. 52.6); 6-month low. PBoC refrained from conducting open market operations for the 8th consecutive day.

Top Asian News

  • Mobius Says China Stocks Are Too Expensive After Tech-Led Surge
  • Hongqiao Tycoon Sought China Help on Auditor Talks, Short Seller
  • Yum China 1Q Rev. Beats Est.; Shares Rise
  • South Korea Tests Long-Range Ballistic Missile, Yonhap Reports
  • ADB Keeps 2017 Growth Forecast for Developing Asia at 5.7%
  • Japan Stocks to Watch: Yamato, McDonald’s, Honda Motor, Toyota
  • China Bear Has Change of Heart on Bet for New Business Cycle
  • Yes, Axis Bank Shares Overshoot Analyst Targets; Hedging Cheap

European equities initially traded with a risk-off bias following the decline in US and Asian bourses after the FOMC minutes showed that members were concerned over the strength in stock markets as some participants viewed equity prices as “quite high”. While the minutes also showed that officials were split on whether higher inflation warranted faster hikes now or a more gradual pace. As such,  financial names have been hardest hit across Europe, while the weakness in crude futures has weighed on the energy sector. The flight to quality trade has been felt in credit markets, with bond yields trending lower this morning. However, the gains in Eurozone bond prices have been curbed by supply from Spain and France. In terms of how the supply was digested, both were received well by the market with French paper managing to survive any political concerns in the region as the usual buyers managed to step up to the plate as expected.

Top European News:

  • German Factory Orders Recover as Economic Momentum Strong
  • EU Steelmakers Win 5-Year Tariffs on Chinese Hot-Rolled Coil
  • These ’Anomalous’ Spreads Show the ECB Distorting Bond Markets
  • Vlieghe Says Faster U.K. Inflation Alone Won’t Nudge Him to Hike
  • Seadrill at Mercy of Day Traders as Biggest Funds Dump Stock
  • German Banks Call for ECB to Scale Back Bond Purchases This Year
  • Vivendi Said to Seek Two-Thirds of Telecom Italia Board Seats
  • Amundi Sees Stock Bulls Return to Europe as France Concerns Fade
  • PPG May ‘Slightly’ Increase Its Bid for Akzo Nobel, KBC Says

In currencies, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index added 0.1 percent at 10:45 a.m. in London following a 0.1 percent drop Wednesday. The euro erased earlier gains to trade little changed. The South African rand regained some ground after recent declines to trade 0.1 percent higher. USD/JPY has again tested down into the low 110.00’s, but we continue to run into buyers ahead the figure, and will likely do so as long as the key 10yr yield holds off 2.30%. This will rest on Wall Street to a notable degree, with European bourses modestly lower so far this morning. We have also seen EUR/JPY dip under 118.00 again, but the recovery looks temporary as does the pullback off the EUFt/USD lows this morning, where sub 1.0650 has been retested. We have the ECB  inutes later today, but president Draghi has already reassured the market that there further evidence/confidence required before altering the current monetary policy stance, but the EUR dip was short lived. This impact on EUR/GBP also, testing down to 0.8500 but holding off the figure and rebounding sharply to suggest some sizeable buy orders ahead. Cable is caught between 1.2400 and 1.2500 as a result, but the tight trade in GBP near term is perhaps also reflective of the lack of gauge in UK-EU negotiations to come.

In commodities, WTI crude erased an earlier drop to trade little changed at $51.17 a barrel; data on Wednesday showed U.S. output rose for a seventh week and inventories expanded to a fresh record. Gold fell 0.2 percent to $1,253.38 an ounce.  Commodity markets have much to contend with amid the political backdrop, heightened by the meeting between respective presidents Trump and Xi Jinping. Nevertheless, fresh hopes of Chinese demand continue to bolster base metals near term, with Copper edging higher but tentatively so as USD2.70 nears. On the day, Zinc is outperforming, but few specific drivers to point to with the overhang of the ‘above. Oil prices have managed to stabilise after the surprise DoE build reported yesterday, having dipped below USD51.00. A tentative recovery as yet. Precious metals continue to move with Treasuries, and in line with this, risk sentiment adds some support which ties in with the dip in US yields.

Looking at the day ahead, we will get the latest ECB minutes followed by US data which includes the latest weekly initial jobless claims report. The other important event today is the earlier mentioned meeting between President Trump and China President Xi Jinping.

US Event Calendar

  • 7:30am: Challenger Job Cuts YoY, prior -40.0%
  • 8:30am: Initial Jobless Claims, est. 250,000, prior 258,000
  • 8:30am: Continuing Claims, est. 2.03m, prior 2.05
  • 9:30am: Fed’s Williams Speaks on a Panel in Frankfurt
  • 9:45am: Bloomberg Consumer Comfort, prior 49.7

DB’s Jim Reid summaries the overnight wrap

Where did it all go wrong for US equities last night after a strong session before the last 2 hours? Well the FOMC minutes and comments from House Speaker Ryan seemed to turn a +0.76% gain to a closing -0.31% loss in the S&P 500. The sections of the minutes that concerned the market were “some participants viewed equity prices as quite high relative to standard valuation measures” and also that “prices of other risk assets, such as emerging market stocks, high yield corporate bonds, and commercial real estate, had also risen significantly in recent months”. The more talked about subject in the market leading into the minutes was what Fed officials were thinking about the balance sheet debate. The minutes revealed that “provided that the economy continued to perform about as expected, most participants anticipated that gradual increases in the federal funds rate would continue and judged that a change to the committee’s reinvestment policy would likely be appropriate later this year”. Meanwhile the discussion around fiscal policy suggested that stimulus expectations have been pushed out by some officials to 2018 which matches what the Fed’s Evans had said last week. Indeed the minutes showed that “participants continued to underscore the considerable uncertainty about the timing and nature of potential changes to fiscal policies as well as the size of the effects of such changes on economic activity”. The text then went on to say that “however, several participants now anticipated that meaningful fiscal stimulus would likely not begin until 2018” and that in light of this “about half of the participants did not incorporate explicit assumptions about fiscal policies in their projections”.

Meanwhile the Ryan comments emerged in a Reuters article in which he was quoted as saying that tax reforms will take longer to accomplish than the repeal and replacement of Obamacare. Ryan also said that “the House has a (tax reform) plan but the Senate doesn’t quite have one yet” and “so even the three entities aren’t on the same page yet”. Separate to this Ryan also confirmed that the House will not reach a deal on healthcare before the start of the two week break with a Congressman official also confirming that “we are going to go home tomorrow without a deal”.

Treasury yields had topped out at 2.382% for the 10y just prior to the minutes and Ryan comments yesterday before falling sharply into the close to end the day down 2.5bps at 2.336%. It was a similar story at the front end too with 2y yields ending the day down 1.8bps at 1.236%. The Dollar index finished more or less unchanged after paring a move higher of as much as +0.30% while Gold bounced all the way back after being down as much as -1.00%. The other big mover in the commodity complex was Oil where WTI Oil had at one stage traded as high as $51.88/bbl and over +1.50% higher intraday. However the latest EIA data revealed that crude stockpiles rose to another record high last week which sent Oil prices sharply lower with WTI back below $51/bbl this morning.

Today the focus turns to President Trump’s two-day meeting with China President Xi Jingping at Trump’s estate in Florida. There don’t appear to be any scheduled press conferences just yet but it’s worth keeping an eye on the headlines as the next two days progress. Clearly North Korea will be a subject near to the top of the agenda. Importantly though the meeting is the start of a new China-US bilateral relationship so the rhetoric which follows from the leaders will be closely scrutinised and debated one would imagine.

Ahead of that markets in Asia this morning appear to be largely following the lead from that weaker momentum into the Wall Street close last night. The Nikkei (-1.40%) has been the big mover this morning, not helped by a slightly stronger Yen (which has touched the highest since mid-November), while the Hang Seng (-0.50%), ASX (-0.62%) and Kospi (-0.53%) are also down. Bourses in China are however flat as we go to print. That is despite the Caixin PMI in China falling 0.4pts to 52.2 in March and the lowest level since September. US equity futures are also currently in the red.

Moving on. While the FOMC minutes and Ryan comments largely dominated the focus for markets yesterday there was also some important data to digest. Indeed helping to support the initial positive sentiment in markets was the March ADP employment report which revealed a significant 263k gain in private payrolls. That was well above the consensus forecast for 185k and although there was a 53k downward revision to the February reading the three month average has still risen to a healthy 259k which paints a positive picture ahead of payrolls tomorrow.

In contrast there was some disappointment in the ISM non-manufacturing print for last month which declined 2.4pts at the headline to 55.2 (vs. 57.0 expected) and the lowest since October while the final services PMI was also revised down 0.1pts to 52.8. In the details of the former the employment component tumbled 3.6pts to 51.6 which is actually the lowest reading since August while new orders dipped 2.3pts, albeit to a still solid 58.9.

Over in Europe the main focus was also on the final PMI revisions. The final services reading for the Euro area was revised down half a point to 56.0 which as a result saw the composite scaled back 0.3pts to 56.4. That softer services reading was largely as a result of a 1pt downward revision in France to 57.5 with Germany left unchanged at 55.6. In Italy the services PMI declined 1.5pts to 52.9 (vs. 54.3 expected) while in Spain the PMI came in at 57.4 and marginally down on February. All told our economists in Europe noted that notwithstanding the slight retreat in the reading the Euro area PMIs still suggest clear upside to their moderate growth forecasts in Q1. Indeed they note that the data points to growth of 0.6% to 0.7% qoq versus their 0.3% to 0.4% projection which reflects more mixed hard data of late. For completeness the services PMI in the UK yesterday was solid at 55.0 for March which represents an uplift of 1.7pts. That helped the FTSE 100 to close up +0.13% while the Stoxx 600 finished +0.02% after paring gains into the close.

Staying with Europe for a second, it’s worth noting the comments from ECB Governing Council member Weidmann yesterday. In an interview with Die Zeit, Weidmann said that it is getting closer to a time when the ECB should “not have the foot pressed down on the gas pedal, but to lift it slightly”. The article also suggested that Weidmann would welcome bond purchases stopping in one year and that the economic recovery in the Euro area is robust and will continue. So fairly hawkish, although not too dissimilar to the timing implied by the ECB. Interestingly there was no comment or mention about depo policy which has been more topical of late.

Looking at the day ahead, this morning in Europe it’s fairly quiet with factory orders data in Germany the only release of note. ECB President Draghi is also due to speak in Frankfurt at 8am BST when he makes opening remarks at the annual ‘ECB and its Watchers Conference’ so that might be worth keeping an eye on. The ECB’s Praet will also speak at the event as will the Fed’s Williams at 2.30pm BST. Away from that we will then get the latest ECB minutes just after midday followed by US data which includes the latest weekly initial jobless claims report. The other important event today is the earlier mentioned meeting between President Trump and China President Xi Jinping.

via http://ift.tt/2p4zarB Tyler Durden

Cudmore: “It’s Now A Matter Of When, Not If, Markets Break Down”

After yesterday’s sudden last hour swoon, in which the market tumbled some 200 points after the FOMC Minutes, the biggest intraday slide in 14 months, suddenly the bears – especially those who until recently were on the fence – are getting more vocal, such as Mark Cudmore, Bloomberg’s former FX trader who this morning writes that “it’s now a matter of when, not if, markets break down into a proper bout of risk-aversion.” As for timing, he sayd that “we’re debating the hour rather than the week.”

His full note:

The Markets Have Made Their Negative Feelings Clear

It’s now a matter of when, not if, markets break down into a proper bout of risk-aversion. As for timing, we’re debating the hour rather than the week.

The catalyst might be headlines from the Trump-Xi summit, or the ECB’s comments, or it might be the labor report tomorrow, or something else entirely. It doesn’t matter. Markets have made clear which way they want to go, they just haven’t picked which catalyst they’ll blame.

It’s not about where assets are priced today — the key levels have still not broken — it’s the path they followed to arrive there. After the strong ADP jobs report, equities rallied, Treasuries fell, the yen slumped, etc. The moves were powerful enough to squeeze out weak risk-asset bears and breed complacency among bulls.

Then the Fed minutes were delivered. The reversals were sharp and just at the moment when nobody was thinking of the downside to risk assets. This means the market will have to chase these moves. But not aggressively quite yet — most traders will now be nervously watching the ranges and counting on them to hold again.

The key remains the 2.3% yield level in 10-year Treasuries. With the Fed intimating that balance sheet reduction may come sooner than investors expected, thereby potentially reducing the pace of rate hikes, that market is fundamentally fragile as well.

It’s tempting to argue that, no matter all that has been thrown at markets in recent months — from a Fed hike to the failure of the health-care bill — the ranges still hold. It’s this attitude that has only raised their relevance and increased the likely volatility when they cleanly break.

I’d be surprised if the levels survive Thursday, let alone until the weekend. The tide has already turned and we’re soon going to see who is swimming naked.

via http://ift.tt/2oM7BE3 Tyler Durden

The Miami Condo Implosion Is Much Worse Than Aggregate Industry Numbers Reveal

Authored by Wolf Richter via Wolf Street,

Condo sales in Miami-Dade County have plunged. Condos on the market have surged. Supply has hit 14 months. Developers are sitting on completed units they can’t sell, and months’ supply in their projects has reached several years.

With this kind of supply-and-demand imbalance – sales down 25% from February 2014, inventory up 90% since early 2013 – you’d expect prices to head south. But the median price of condos in February, according to the Miami Association of Realtors, increased 6.3% year-over-year. This is the mystery we’ll shed some light on (chart by StatFunding):

 

StatFunding conducted an analysis of sales price per square foot in four condo projects with 2,634 units in Brickell, an area of Miami that is part of the “condo corridor.” These projects – 1050 & 1060 Brickell, Axis Brickell, Plaza Brickell, and Jade Brickell – are representative of the overall condo market. Turns out, per-square-foot prices in those four projects peaked in 2014 and 2015 and have since dropped between 10% and 16%.

So what’s going on?

One of the projects was completed in 2004, the other three in 2008. Hence there is a sales history. They’re “newer” and well-maintained projects in the aspiring-luxury and luxury categories of the market. Each project was built by a different developer (pricing data as of March 2017, based on the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) and the Miami-Dade Recorder).

The three projects completed in 2008 got caught up in the foreclosure crisis when these units were liquidated at prices as low as $200 a square foot. Whoever bought them at this price more than doubled their money by 2014! But that party has now ended.

1050 & 1060 Brickell (2008), “aspiring-luxury” category; two towers, none on the waterfront; 576 units, with studio, 1-bedroom, 2-story 1-bedroom loft, 2-bedroom, and 3-bedroom penthouse units; 55 units (9% of total) for sale on the MLS, or 26 months’ supply (25 units sold in 12 months). Average price per square foot (blue line) has dropped 16% since the peak in 2014.

 

In this particular project, studios, lofts, and units below the 14th floor were excluded. Here’s why:

The layout of the building is peculiar: The parking pedestal is shared by both towers, and the amenities and the pool deck are on the 12th floor. The units below the 12th floor are squeezed in leftover spaces of the project, and are almost all 1-bedroom 2-story lofts. Given their proximity to parking, they have a street-level feel, and according to Andrew Stearns, CEO of StatFunding, “the pricing on the units is all over the place and not representative of the project as a whole.”

Studios were excluded because the 1050/1060 is the only project of the four with studios, and there is no comparable data from the other projects.

Penthouses were excluded for all four projects since are all unique and sales don’t occur with enough frequency.

Axis Brickell (2008), aspiring-luxury category, two towers, neither on the waterfront; 718 units, with 1-bedroom, 2-bedroom, 3-bedroom, and penthouse units; 89 units (12% of total) listed for sale on the MLS, or 45 months’ supply (24 units sold in 12 months). The average price per square foot (excl. below 10th floor and penthouse units) has dropped 11% since the peak in 2014.

 

Plaza Brickell (2008), two towers, neither on the waterfront, aspiring-luxury category; 1,000 units, with 1-bedroom, 2-bedroom, 3-bedroom, and penthouse units. 84 units (8% of total) listed for sale, or 26 months’ supply (36 units sold in 12 months). Average price per square foot (excl. below 11th floor and penthouse units) has dropped 10% since the peak in 2014.

 

Jade Brickell (2004), waterfront luxury category; 340 units, with 1-bedroom, 2-bedroom, 3-bedroom, 4+ bedroom, “townhouse,” and penthouse units. Completed in the middle of the prior condo bubble, the project “became a hotbed of mortgage fraud and subsequent foreclosure activity.”

Currently 37 units (11% of total) are listed for sale, or 22 months’ supply (20 units sold in 12 months). The average price per square foot (excl. below 8th floor and penthouse units) has dropped 16% since the peak in 2015.

 

This chart shows the average sales price per square foot for all four projects’ averages combined:

 

Among the reasons prices have declined:

  • The strengthening dollar makes real estate more expensive for foreign purchasers, a big force in Miami.
  • Foreign purchasers could also be chased off by the efforts of the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network to target hotspots of money laundering in real estate, and cash sales in February plunged 18% year-over-year… How Much Money Laundering is Going On in the Housing Market? A Lot
  • The change in pricing momentum could be making prospective purchasers skittish.
  • New supply from the pre-construction condo boom that now too is running into trouble competes with existing condos.
  • The surge in resale inventory.

Why do the numbers not add up? But they do add up

Why do these price declines not show up in the median prices published by the Miami Association of Realtors? Stearns explained:

The realtor’s aggregate data is flawed because from 2009-2016 the data was full of sub $150k sales of bombed-out foreclosure borderline worthless properties – and those properties have worked their way through the system and are the weak comps that make the reported year-over-year average or median gains “true” but entirely meaningless.

So the median price is up 6.3% year-over-year, but it’s meaningless because the prior-year data was pushed down by nearly worthless foreclosed old condos working their way through the process. These units are still not totally gone (Miami Realtors Association lists them as under $50,000 on page 8 of its report).

The consequences when Realtor-published data shows median prices are rising though in reality prices of good condos are declining? Stearns:

What is driving real estate agents crazy is that the local and national real estate associations keep on putting rosy reports out there saying “prices up 7% this month, etc.” but then the agent has to explain to their client that the pricing in their condo building is actually down 20% over the last 18 months with a 5-year supply of units listed for sale.

 

Most people who make the decision to sell cannot wait five years to find a buyer, which means they have to price the unit at the low end of the market to get their unit sold, which explains a lot about why prices are falling in this market with surging inventory.

 

The rosy reports might be true in the aggregate, but they mask the distress in certain segments of the market, which makes for painful conversations between real estate agents and their clients.

Miami-Dade’s spectacular condo flipping mania is once again in turmoil. Read… Condo Flippers in Miami-Dade Left Twisting in the Wind

via http://ift.tt/2oLWISL Tyler Durden

Germany Passes Bill To Fine FaceBook, Twitter Up To $50MM For “Fake News”

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has apparently decided she’s not willing to take the chance of becoming the latest politician to fall victim to the same “Russian hacking” and “fake news” campaigns which ‘undoubtedly’ caused the downfall of America’s liberal darling, Hillary Clinton (forget those pay-for-play scandals, federal record retention violations and willful non-compliance with Congressional subpeonas…total non-factors in the 2016 election). 

And since they can’t really control the actions of those pesky ‘Russian hackers,” Germany’s cabinet has instead decided to pass legislation that would impose serious fines of up to 50 million Euros on any social networks that fail to swiftly remove content that could be deemed “hateful” or “fake news.”  Per Yahoo News:

Germany’s Cabinet on Wednesday approved a new bill that punishes social networking sites if they fail to swiftly remove illegal content such as hate speech or defamatory fake news.

 

Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Cabinet agreed on rules that would impose fines of up to 50 million euros (53.4 million dollars) on Facebook, Twitter and other social media platforms.

 

German Justice Minister Heiko Maas said that the companies offering such online platforms are responsible for removing hateful content. He said the new bill would not restrict the freedom of expression, but intervene only when criminal hatred or intentionally false news are posted.

Of course, all of this begs the question of exactly how German officials define “fake news” as the lines between what is pure ‘fact’ versus ‘opinion’ often grow very blurred in politics.  Moreover, politicians themselves are often the biggest purveyors of “fake news”…so if someone quotes the erroneous comments of a German politician on FaceBook is the social network then liable?  All questions that would have seemed silly just a year ago…

Masas

 

Nevertheless, German Justice Minister Heiko Maas is convinced that “verbal radicalization” of snowflakes over twitter and Facebook is often a precursor to “physical violence.”

Social networks need to ensure that obviously criminal content — as defined by German law — will be deleted within 24 hours and other illegal content after seven days.

 

“Just like on the streets, there is also no room for criminal incitement on social networks,” Maas said.

 

“The internet affects the culture of debate and the atmosphere in our society. Verbal radicalization is often a preliminary stage to physical violence,” he added.

But nevermind the actual ‘radicalization’ occurring in migrant communities throughout Europe at the moment…that is also just “fake news.”

As we noted last week, Assemblyman Ed Chau (D-Monterey Park) recently introduced a similar piece of legislation in California, the so-called “California Political Cyberfraud Abatement Act” or AB 1104 for short, that would have effectively made it a crime to be wrong on the Internet.  The text of the bill implicated anyone who writes, publishes or even shares news stories that could be false, if those news stories are later found to have had an impact on an election.  From the bill:

This bill would modify the definition of the terms “political cyberfraud” and “political Web site” to include Internet Web sites that urge or appear to urge the support or opposition of candidates for public office. The bill would also make it unlawful for a person to knowingly and willingly make, publish or circulate on a Web site, or cause to be made, published, or circulated in any writing posted on a Web site, a false or deceptive statement designed to influence the vote on any issue submitted to voters at an election or on any candidate for election to public office.

And even though author Ed Chau described AB 1104 as “an important step forward in the fight against ‘fake news’ and deceptive campaign tactics”, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a digital-rights advocacy group, said the bill was “so obviously unconstitutional, we had to double check that it was real.”

Memo to California Assemblymember Ed Chau: you can’t fight fake news with a bad law.

 

On Tuesday, the California Assembly’s Committee on Privacy and Consumer Affairs, which Chau chairs, will consider A.B. 1104—a censorship bill so obviously unconstitutional, we had to double check that it was real.

 

This bill will fuel a chaotic free-for-all of mudslinging with candidates and others being accused of crimes at the slightest hint of hyperbole, exaggeration, poetic license, or common error. While those accusations may not ultimately hold up, politically motivated prosecutions—or the threat of such—may harm democracy more than if the issue had just been left alone. Furthermore, A.B. 1104 makes no exception for satire and parody, leaving The Onion and Saturday Night Live open to accusations of illegal content. Nor does it exempt news organizations who quote deceptive statements made by politicians in their online reporting—even if their reporting is meant to debunk those claims. And what of everyday citizens who are duped by misleading materials: if 1,000 Californians retweet an incorrect statement by a presidential candidate, have they all broken the law?

 

At a time when political leaders are promoting “alternative facts” and branding unflattering reporting as “fake news,” we don’t think it’s a good idea to give the government more power to punish speech.

But, unlike in Germany, California actually realized how idiotic their bill was before passing it into law…

via http://ift.tt/2oGAmou Tyler Durden

Brickbat: God Bless You

football fieldAn anonymous group wanted to donate $50,000 for a new turf field at the high school in Indiana’s Greenfield-Central Schools. But school board members balked at the group’s one request: to use the hashtag #BlessTheWorld to acknowledge their gift. School board members were afraid of using the word “bless.” “There was some apprehension about if that was a gray area. If that was a breach of the separation of church and state that is often quoted from the first amendment,” said Superintendent Harold Olin. The group withdrew its donation.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2nekGcd
via IFTTT

Visualizing The Buying Power Of The U.S. Dollar Over The Last Century

Submitted by Jeff Desjardins of Visual Capitalist,

The value of money is not static. In the short term, it may ebb and flow against other currencies on the market. In the long-term, a currency tends to lose buying power over time through inflation, and as more currency units are created.

Inflation is a result of too much money chasing too few goods – and it is often influenced by government policies, central banks, and other factors. In this short timeline of monetary history in the 20th century, we look at major events, the change in money supply, and the buying power of the U.S. dollar in each decade.

Here is a visual guide to the buying power of $1 over the past century:

Courtesy of: Visual Capitalist

 

At the turn of the 20th century, the money supply was just $7 billion. Today there are literally 1,900X more dollars in existence.

While economic growth has meant we all make many more dollars today, it is still phenomenal to think that during past moments in the 20th century, a dollar could buy a pair of leather shoes or a women’s house dress.

The buying power of a dollar has changed significantly over the last century, but it’s important to recognize that it could change even faster (up or down) under the right economic circumstances.

via http://ift.tt/2oG69FQ Tyler Durden

Necons Demand Action in Syria, While Serious Questions Regarding the Chemical Attack Remain Unanswered

Today, President Trump ‘changed his mind’ about Syria and Assad, due to the horrific pictures showing victims of a chemical weapons attack that killed dozens in the ISIS controlled city of Idlib. The media has been plastering one dead child after the next — evoking emotional responses from people looking for a villain to bomb. On a much smaller scale, these are the same tactics that were used to draw us into the 9/11 wars, which still persist in all of their horrible, indecorous, calamity, 16 years hence.

Trump has changed his mind.

Before we start send sorties into Syria, trying to take out both Russian and Syrian forces, how about we first see evidence proving this was a government sponsored attack?

Thus far, according to the NY Times, this is all we have — this one flimsy attestation by ‘witnesses.’

Witnesses said the gas was delivered by a government airstrike. The attacks raised the possibility that the Syrian government used a banned nerve agent, like sarin, after it agreed in 2013 to eliminate its chemical weapons program.

Fox’s Geraldo ‘Al Capone Punk’d Me from the Grave’ Rivera offered his take, stating the obvious. It made no sense for Assad to use chemical weapons, especially after the US made overtures accepting his rule in the country.

The US Ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, gave an overly dramatic speech regarding the attacks — standing up and showing pictures of dead children, asking Russia ‘how many children have to die before Russia cares?’

Russian officials have a different account of the events in Idlib. They said Assad attacked an ISIS weapons depot, which had chemical weapons in it.

Can we be sure who is telling the truth? No.

But, thanks to social media, some serious facts have been presented, such as people receiving gas masks two days prior to the attacks and an anti-Assad reporter, writing about a chemical gas attack 24 hours in advance. How can we explain this? Personally, I think we’d be fools to believe anything ISIS or the ‘moderate rebels’ have to say on the matter.

Let’s examine the timeline and what has just transpired. The war that the neocons have wanted for the past half decade in Syria, displacing Assad for a ‘pro-western’ leader, was just greenlit by Trump. Bannon was booted from the NSC, amidst rumors that Trump’s son in law, Jared Kushner, was leaking info to the Morning Shill, Joe Scarborough. Nikkie Haley sabre rattled Russia, Syria and Iran at the UN. Trump ‘changed his mind.’ Rex Tillerson told Russia to ‘rethink Assad.’

And, lastly, Trump called Merkel to discuss the Ukraine.

This is either the best game of 10d waterpolo ever played or we’ve been had.

One last thing before I go. Motive.

Content originally published at iBankCoin.com

 

via http://ift.tt/2oLywjm The_Real_Fly

With Trump As President Prepping Is More Important Than Ever

Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,

I don’t believe it is as pervasive as certain people may think, but there is a notion among some in the liberty movement that with Donald Trump in the White House the need for crisis preparedness has subsided. Because preppers and survivalists tend to lean towards the conservative side of things, the urgency for prepping almost always explodes when the Democratic party is “in power.” As they say, for example, Barack Obama was perhaps the greatest gun salesman in history with the gun industry growing over 158% during his two terms.

Now with Republican dominance in Congress, Senate and White House, there is a possible temptation for conservatives to become complacent and comfortable once again. In 2017 so far, ATF background checks have dropped by at least half a million since this time last year, and gun company stocks are turning negative. There are also rumors floating around that survival food companies are suffering from a severe crunch in sales. Though I have not yet found this to be substantiated, I can verify that many preppers I deal with on a daily basis seem to have relaxed their guard.

I would point out that this is not necessarily all due to Trump. The gun market is likely saturated after eight years of Obama, and one must also consider that as the U.S. economy continues to decline, surplus cash used for prep gear is going to dry up. That said, I do think it is important to examine any assumptions liberty activists might have in terms of a Trump driven “recovery.”

When I began publishing my post-election analysis on what I felt was a predictable Trump win, I did find anger among some activists who decided I was being “too pessimistic,” and that I should join the movement in celebration. Being that I called a Trump presidency half a year in advance based on the premise that the globalists needed a conservative scapegoat for the next phase of the ongoing financial crisis, it was hardly a moment of celebration for me.

There is a common delusion among those that invest themselves in politics that all that is needed to reverse the course of any nation or situation is a “strong leader” with ample cheerleading from the populace. In reality, social and geopolitical disasters are usually far beyond the means of any one politician to change. Economic disasters are even more irreversible. I wish I could pretend to be optimistic, but I am rather well studied in the history of these kinds of events.

Conservatives are especially vulnerable to the idea of a “protector on a white horse” coming to their rescue; a God-fearing hero and statesman, a general and leader of men. But, such people do not exist. There are no supermen. There are no worldly saviors. There are only common men, with common failings, destined to face extraordinary obstacles. The great men of history are not born before hand — they are forged in the crucible of crisis. Great men are not great men until proven otherwise. To assume any political leader is a great man beforehand is foolish, to say the least.

This is why blind faith in a post-Trump renaissance is misplaced. It is something that has yet to be proven, and in the meantime, there are numerous and highly visible dangers on the horizon that demand continued vigilance and preparedness. I will examine one of these primary dangers now…

The Growing Threat Of Civil Unrest

As I noted in my post-election analysis, the political Left has been shell shocked by the rise of Trump and their emotional response would undoubtedly be to double down and become progressively more volatile and more violent. I predicted that this would be evident as winter broke and the cold weather subsided.

The first signs of this are surfacing as May Day is becoming a rally date for social justice mobs bent on disrupting any agenda the Trump administration might have for enforcing immigration laws. The largest of these protests is to be held in Los Angeles, but similar protests are planned nationwide as well.

From what we have seen from previous rallies, it would not be unfair to expect rioting in May. I say this because a tone shift in the left is taking place and extreme reactions are more frequent. The following video illustrates this clearly, I think…

Warning – Explicit

In case you missed it, this guy just pulled an AR-15 on someone simply because they had a MAGA flag on their truck. Not only that, but he FILMED HIMSELF doing it and and apparently posted it on social media. That is how brazen and insane these people are becoming.

Think of it this way — could you have even imagined something like this happening during the 2012 election? It is important not to become conditioned to such behavior as being “normal.”

To be sure, this sort of thing will not be happening in certain parts of the country. In my state of Montana, the assailant would have been shot two dozen times over by our highly armed population regardless of his politics just on the self defense principle. And frankly, I am fine with that. Citizens providing security for citizens is the American way.

What I do have a problem with, though, is the increasing potential for an extreme response from conservatives in the face of leftist lunacy. Meaning, I worry about martial law with conservative support, which in my view is more and more likely over the next two years.

Contrary to popular belief among tough-government champions, martial law often instigates more violence than it solves. The harsher the crackdown, the more vicious the push-back; the more vicious the push-back the more totalitarianism is rationalized by authorities. It’s a terrible cycle.

Preparedness in terms of self defense should be self-explanatory here. During widespread mob action the rule of law is usually the first casualty, even when martial law is instituted. You also never know when some nutcase might declare you a “Trump supporter” (whether you are one or not) as he reaches for a weapon.

It is fascinating to me the level of cognitive dissonance with some liberty activists who seem to think Trump’s first term will be anything other than pure chaos. George Soros, an elitist who often funds the very groups organizing mobs to protest Trump, said it plainly:

“I think Trump will fail.”

 

“What’s more Soros predicted that the market’s Trump high will soon turn into a hangover. He called Trump unpredictable and unprepared, and said that combination will end up bad for the market.”

Soros and his globalist colleagues do not need to field guesses; they ENGINEER the outcomes that they “predict.” Social unrest at this fragile time would result in the exact market instability Soros mentioned, among other problems.

Look, you may believe Trump is being threatened on all sides by the so-called “deep state,” or you may believe that he has willingly surrounded himself with global elitists because he is a Trojan horse. Either way, the diagnosis for the future is not rosy. It would be naive to think that the globalists would not do everything in their power to foment calamity in the near term. It would be equally naive to believe that such an agenda could be repelled through political means.

The answer, as always, is a prepared citizenry. This can act as a deterrent as much as a measure of comfort. The more prepared the public is for any eventuality, the less affected we will be by disaster. The less affected we are by disaster, the less fearful we will be when it strikes and the less likely we will be to make stupid decisions such as throwing our support behind martial law and the wholesale erasure of the constitution. The more prepared we are, the fewer options available to the establishment when attempting to lure us into poor collective decisions.

Prepping means freedom in the face of uncertainty, and times have never been more uncertain. To summarize: A Trump White House calls for more caution, not less.

via http://ift.tt/2oG0gc5 Tyler Durden

Lee Stranahan: ‘Ideological Coup’ By Kushner-Linked Goldman Globalists Destroying Trump White House

After Wikileaks revelations that Citigroup picked Obama’s cabinet, it appears the Trump administration is succumbing to ‘same globalism, different bank.’

Weeks after the Daily Mail exposed an internal struggle between Kushner-linked Goldman Sachs operatives and Trump advisor Steve Bannon, it has become clear that an “ideological coup” led by globalist bankers is well underway – claiming populist Steve Bannon as their latest victim. This ties in with Roger Stone’s warning that Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner has been leaking anti-Bannon information to MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough.

Well, it appears the Goldman globalists have won… for now. Wednesday evening, former Breitbart lead investigative reporter Lee Stranahan dropped an insightful Periscope video in which he laid out exactly what’s going on in the White House – pointing out who’s running the show, and imploring people to simply research the players for themselves.

In a nutshell: Weeks after meeting with Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein at the Four Seasons bar in DC, Jared Kushner-friendly Goldman alums have successfully maneuvered Trump’s top advisor Steve Bannon off the Natl. Security Council – further strengthening the globalist cabal’s influence over President Trump. Jared Kushner, it should be pointed out, has a well documented history of donating to Democrats; including Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and Robert Mendez (D-NJ).

Let’s look at the ex-Goldman operators within the Trump White House:

Gary Cohn – recently Goldman’s #2, is Trump’s chief economic advisor – who was granted an unprecedented accelerated payout of $285 Million in order to go work at the White House.

  • Staunch Democrat
  • Huge globalist, led Goldman delegation to restructure Greek debt during financial crisis, helping them hide debt from EU overseers in Brussels.
  • Head of the National Economic Council as of January 20th, 2017
  • Brought in Drew Quinn – lead negotiator of TPP

 

 


Dina Habib Powell, another top Goldman alum and former president of the Goldman Sachs foundation:

 

Instead of draining the swamp, Goldman alums Cohn, Powell, and Treasury Secretary Mnuchin are the swamp…

The populist, nationalist agenda that Donald Trump was elected on is getting pushed out of the White house.

 

The fact that Powell is in (who was in the Bush administration), as a Security advisor, is deeply troubling. She’s got Ben Rhodes’ old job.

Goldman Sachs has taken over…

We voted for the working people who have been taken advantage of by companies like Goldman Sachs. You’ve been screwed by Goldman Sachs. Look up TARP. You didn’t vote for Goldman Sachs.

 

We did not vote for Globalism.

And before you say “Wait, Steve Bannon is from Goldman!” – full stop… Bannon addressed how the megabank has changed and no longer shares his values.

What can Trump voters do?

Stranahan has one request for any and all who oppose this ideological coup by Goldman Sachs: CALL THE WHITE HOUSE!

See entire Periscope here:

  

Content originally generated at iBankCoin.com * Follow on Twitter @ZeroPointNow

via http://ift.tt/2nMCLdl ZeroPointNow