Weekend Reading: Fiscal Irresponsibility

Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

Without much fanfare or public discussion, Congress has decided to push the U.S. into deeper fiscal responsibility. Earlier this week, the House passed another Continuing Resolution (CR) to keep the government from “shutting down” prior to the mid-term elections.

“The House on Wednesday passed an $854 billion spending bill to avert an October shutdown, funding large swaths of the government while pushing the funding deadline for others until Dec. 7.

The bill passed by 361-61, a week after the Senate passed an identical measure by a vote of 93-7.”

For almost a decade, Congress has failed to pass, and operate, underneath a budget. Of course, without any repercussions from voters in demanding that Congress “does their job,” the path to fiscal insolvency continues to grow.

The Committee For A Responsible Federal Budget made the following statement:

“We’re pleased policymakers have likely avoided a shutdown and actually appropriated most of this year’s discretionary budget on time. But let’s not forgot that Congress did so without a budget and had to grease the wheels with $153 billion to pass these bills. That isn’t function; it’s a fiscal free-for-all.”

Of course, with trillion-dollar deficits just around the corner, the negative impact from unbridled spending and debt increases will begin to reverse the positive effects from deregulation and tax reform.

The bigger problem with the $854 billion CR just passed by the House, and awaiting the President’s signature, is that it only covers spending from now until December. Such means that by the time we get the full 2019 budget funded, with the annual automatic increases still in place, we will be looking at more than $2 Trillion in annual spending. Such will require further increases in debt issuance at a time when there are potentially fewer buys of Treasuries readily available.

As shown in the chart below, with the major Central Banks reducing their balance sheets simultaneously, some of the more major buyers are being removed from the market.

“Central bank balance sheets have shrunk by over half-a-trillion dollars since March. This decrease in global liquidity – in the face of a global slowdown – raises the risk of policy mistakes much higher than is commonly assumed.” – ECRI

More importantly, next year, sequester-level budget caps will return. The last time budget-caps came into play Ben Bernanke launched QE-3 to offset the economic drag from reduced government spending. Given Central Banks are effectively “out of the game” for now, it is most likely Congress will just bust the budget and then spin it as a “Conservative victory” as they did this year.

As the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget previously stated:

  • Debt Is Rising Unsustainably

  • Spending Is Growing Faster Than Revenue

  • Recent Legislation Will Substantially Worsen the Long-Term Outlook if Extended. 

  • High And Rising Debt Will Have Adverse and Potentially Dangerous Consequences (Will lead to another financial crisis.)

  • Major Trust Funds Are Headed Toward Insolvency. 

  • Fixing the Debt Will Get Harder the Longer Policymakers Wait. 

While the CRFB suggests that lawmakers need to work together to address this bleak fiscal picture now so problems do not compound any further, there is little hope that such will actually be the case given the deep partisanship currently running the country.

As I have stated before, choices will have to be made either by choice or force.

The CRFB agrees with my assessment.

“CBO continues to remind us what we’ve known for a while and seem to be ignoring: the federal budget is on an unsustainable course, particularly over the long term. If policymakers make the tough decisions now – rather than wait until there’s a crisis point for action – the solutions will be fairer and less painful.”

Just something to think about as you catch up on your weekend reading list.

Economy, 2008 & Fed

Markets

Most Read On RIA

Research / Interesting Reads

“There is only one side to the stock market, and it is not the bull side or the bear side, but the right side.” – Jesse Livermore

via RSS https://ift.tt/2OhFigq Tyler Durden

Victory for Low Expectations! New California Housing Bill Isn’t Terrible!

California has passed a half-decent housing bill, if you can believe it. I wouldn’t call it libertarian bill, but it at least evinces an awareness that it’s a problem when local officials to block housing projects they don’t like.

S.B. 829—sponsored by Sen. David Chi (D–San Francisco) and signed into law yesterday by Gov. Jerry Brown—denies state funding and federal tax credits administered by the state to any city that requires local elected officials to sign a “letter of acknowledgement” before a subsidized housing project can move forward.

The target of the bill is Los Angeles, where city councilmembers must issue just such a letter before any new affordable housing funded by the recent Proposition HHH can go up in their districts. This veto power has unsurprisingly been used to wither keep unwanted housing out or to demand various perks and concessions from developers.

Needless to say, publicly funded housing is not the libertarian approach to sheltering low-income Californians. Nevertheless, it is the solution California is sticking to for the moment, and these arbitrary and politicized letters of acknowledgement have only made the process more sluggish and bureaucratic.

A recent Los Angeles Times investigation found examples of city council members refusing to issue these letters of acknowledgement because they felt their district had already accepted its “fair share” of affordable housing projects, or because they did not like the façade of planned apartment buildings. One councilman, Curren Price, even developed his own set of guidelines for what affordable housing developers would have to do in order to earn his letter of acknowledgement, including a requirement that projects on commercial corridors provide pocket parks.

Essentially allowing every member of the city council to write their own rules for new development has been incredibly frustrating for L.A.-area developers.

“With no standards to govern when the letter is issued, in one district a developer could get a green light; in another, the exact same project meeting objective criteria could be killed for no stated reason,” Shashi Hanuman tells the Times. Hanuman, an attorney for the nonprofit law firm Public Counsel, is helping to sue the city of Los Angeles over these letters.

Using the carrot that is state affordable housing funding to get localities to drop one small part of their byzantine rules for approving new housing is thus welcome. But it’s hardly sufficient, says Faizah Malik, another attorney with Public Counsel.

“We welcome the Governor’s signature on this important bill,” said Malik in a statement. But S.B. 829 “hasn’t removed any other processes that permit backroom vetoes, and it hasn’t taken steps to remediate for the harm that this illegal policy has caused.”

Indeed, even when affordable housing projects have the full-throated support of their local representative, California’s voluminous regulations give neighborhood NIMBYs ample opportunity to stall, shrink, or stop unwanted development.

One need only look at the controversy surrounding a planned apartment building for formerly homeless people in East Los Angeles, where a decade-long battle has been waged between local residents and Los Angeles County’s main transit agency, which is trying to get approval to build a below-market rate apartment building on a vacant lot it owns.

Despite having secured the support of Councilman Jose Huizer—whose district includes the proposed building—in early 2016, the project has gone nowhere, stalled first by appeals from angry neighbors who wanted a park on the site instead, later by a lawsuit from business owners worried about shadow and construction dust. The Los Angeles Times has called that suit “NIMBYism at its worst.”

S.B. 829 does nothing to address these kinds of roadblocks. Nor do they tackle some cities’ informal practices that impose a letter of acknowledgement requirement in all but name.

Take bill sponsor Chui’s own city of San Francisco, where a practice known as “supervisorial prerogative” has seen individual supervisors (San Francisco’s version of city council members) exercise an effective veto over new housing projects in their district.

Back in July, the Board of Supervisors bowed to this prerogative in voting to further delay approval of business owner Robert Tillman’s plans to convert a laundromat into a zone-compliant apartment building in the city’s Mission District after Supervisor Hillary Ronen—who represents the Mission—demanded a third shadow study be conducted on proposed building.

Tillman is now suing Ronen and the City of San Francisco over this delay.

In response in S.B. 829, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and members of the city council have begrudgingly said that they’ll repeal the “letter of acknowledgement” requirement for the approval of new housing projects.

To reiterate, publicly funded construction is hardly the ideal way end California’s housing woes. But absent some sort of free market revolution, making the approval of such housing subject to fewer political roadblocks, however marginal the change may be, is a small step toward sanity. This is California we’re talking about. It’s a miracle when anything gets built.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2N8HrX4
via IFTTT

Trade Tantrums & Trump Turmoil Spark Best Quarter For US Stocks In 5 Years

Summing the quarter up nicely…

The World Is Down In 2018…

STOCKS

US stocks are outperforming the world still in 2018 with China worst…

 

US equity markets close the quarter at their most-expensive in history…

 

Best quarter for US stocks in 5 years… (S&P is up 11 of the last 12 quarters)… Dow Transports (green) and Industrials (blue) were best in Q3, Small Caps (red) were worst…

World Stocks (Ex-US) eked out a modest 1.3% gain in Q3 – the first quarterly gain since 2017 – but Chinese stocks fel lfor the 4th quarter in a row…

 

European Stocks were very mixed in Q3 with France’s CAC outperforming and Italy’s FTSEMIB the worst (collapsing in the last few days as budget headlines struck)…

But in September, Italy was best – despite this week’s collapse – and DAX worst…

 

But September was much more mixed in the US…

But Nasdaq closed September red – breaking its 5 month win streak. Small Caps also closed red in Sept, the first down month since February. S&P, however, eked out gains in September for its 6th straight monthly gain in a row…

 

On the week, only Nasdaq closed green (notice the plunge midweek that was caught perfectly at unch)…

 

“Most Shorted” stocks ended lower in September (first monthly drop since Feb) but soared in Q3…

 

US Tech stocks outperformed financials for the 5th quarter in a row, soaring for 7 straight days (relative to financials) into month- and quarter-end…

 

Despite surging rates, banks were battered in September. Only Citi managed to hold on to any gains in September among the big banks with Wells Fargo down almost 10%…

 

FANG Stocks managed to cling to a gain on the quarter – the 7th quarterly gain in a row – and a small loss on the month, but barely…

Tesla stood out in the month and quarter…

Tesla is down 15% today…

 

US Stocks are in a world of their own…

BONDS

Thanks to a bloodbath in September, bonds ended the quarter notably higher in yield…

 

September saw the biggest 10Y bond yield spike since April…

 

The US yield curve flattened for the 7th month in a row (and 12th of the last 13)…

 

And flattened for the 17th quarter in the last 19…

 

On the week, all but 2Y ended the week lower – especially post-FOMC…

 

HY bonds outperformed IG bonds notably for the 4th month in a row (and 3rd quarter in a row)…

 

FX

The Dollar Index ended Q3 unchanged for all intents and purposes – having traded in a very narrow range basically controlled by the ECB spike in Q2 (narrowest since Q2 2014)…

 

Among the majors, Yen was weakest; cable, aussie, and loonie were strongest (marginally though), however, despite its weighting, it was yuan that warranted most attention… PBOC fixed the Yuan at its weakest since Aug 17th and offshore yuan sits right at critical support from its cycle lows…

 

Emerging Market FX fell for the second quarter in a row led by Argentine Peso, Turkish Lira, Indian Rupee, and Russian Ruble (Mexican Peso was best in Q3)…

Emerging Market FX in September was its best month since January, but was mixed under the surface with Argentine Peso worst (down over 10%) and Turkish Lira best (+7.5%)

Cryptos were mixed in Q3 with Bitcoin and Ripple managing gains and Ethereum crashing 45%…

 

Bitcoin is up on the quarter (first quarterly gain since Q4 2017) but down in September…

 

COMMODITIES

WTI dominated commodity-land in Q3 and silver was slammed (but there was some maniacal bid into the quarter-end)…

 

Gold fell for the second quarter in a row (biggest drop since Q4 2016 and first quarterly close below $1200 since Q4 2016)

 

Silver was ugly too – but bounced off its lowest levels since Jan 2009…back up near its 50DMA…

 

And as Gold and silver drop, specs have plunged to unprecedented positioning…

 

Oil headed for its longest string of quarterly gains in more than a decade as impending supply disruptions threaten to fracture a global market with little margin for error. The current front-month (Nov 18) contract is now up 5 quarters in a row…

 

On the month, Copper and Crude surged (China stimulus hopes?) and Silver spiked into the close to end green…

 

Gold/Silver was crushed on the last day on the month/quarter – the biggest daily drop since Nov 2017…

On the week, Silver and Crude were the best performers…

 

The real PhD in economics – Dr. Lumber – collapsed in Q3 – the biggest drop since 1993! (and September was its worst month since April 2011)

 

Finally, US ‘hard’ economic data fell for the 3rd straight quarter – but stocks don’t care…

via RSS https://ift.tt/2IomExO Tyler Durden

Kavanaugh Nomination Hits Snag After Republicans Agree To FBI Probe

Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination has been stalled on the Senate floor after GOP leadership agreed Friday afternoon to an FBI investigation into allegations of sexual harassment against the Supreme Court nominee. Earlier in the day, the Judiciary Committee approved Kavinaugh’s advancement by a vote of 11-10 along party line. 

Immediately before the Committee voted, GOP Senator Jeff Flake of Arizona – who is not running for reelection – attempted to push for a delay pending an FBI investigation, however he was unsuccessful after Chairman Grassley rushed the vote. 

Flake then vowed to vote no on the full floor decision, and was joined by GOP Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, just one day after Dianne Feinstein cornered her in a hallway for an apparent “talking to.” 

While walking into Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s office, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, a key vote, said “yes,” when asked if she supports Sen. Jeff Flake’s proposal for a delay.

CNN asked: And do you think it should be limited to Ford’s accusations or should it include an investigation into other allegations?

Murkowski responded: “I support the FBI having an opportunity to bring some closure to this.” –CNN

With a slim majority in the Senate of 51-49, the GOP would have been unable to push ahead with a Kavanaugh vote without at least Flake or Murkowski’s support, as Vice President Mike Pence could break a tie in a deadlock. 

The move by Flake, a frequent Trump critic who is retiring from the Senate after this year, was cheered by several Democrats, including Sen. Chris Coons (Del.), a fellow member of the Judiciary Committee.

“He and I dont share a lot of political views but we share a deep concern for the health of this institution and what it means to the rest of the world and the country,” said Coons, who huddled with Flake before he announced his position. –WaPo

When asked Friday afternoon what he thought about the delay, President Trump said “I’m going to let the Senate handle that,” insisting that he would not get involved in pressuring the dissenting GOP senators to vote either way. 

Developing…  

via RSS https://ift.tt/2xJBxqe Tyler Durden

Small Caps Fail To Break Out

Authored by Steven Vanelli via Knowledge Leaders Capital blog,

Among the major groups of stocks around the world that we follow, US small-cap stocks have been the best performer over the last decade as the USD experienced a strong bull market. US small caps have outperformed our mid/large group of developed companies by almost 40% over the last 10 years.

The relative performance has been highly correlated to the movement of the USD. US small caps made an intermediate high in April 2015 after the USD soared from about 80 to 100. They then tested this high in December 2016 as the USD once again reached new highs. Recently, as the USD was on the rise once again, small caps again tested their decade-long relative highs.

However, over the last few weeks, as the USD slowly rolled over, small caps are down about 3.5%.

When I tune the time-frame in to just this year’s, the relationship with the USD is even more clear. With an 83% correlation, roughly two-thirds of the performance of small caps this year can be attributed to the rise in the USD.

An interesting picture emerges when I compare US small caps to US mid/large cap stocks. All of the relative performance lead that US small caps have on mid/large caps was achieved from November 2008 through April 2011. For the most part, small caps have traded in a 15% band around mid/large caps for seven years. Small caps have actually been underperforming mid/large cap stocks for four years now, tracing out a sequence of lower highs (April 2015, December 2016 and July 2018).

Small caps have underperformed mid/large caps by about 5% since making a relative high June 21, 2018. There is support nearby, but if small caps underperform US mid/large caps by another 5%, then the technical picture could change for the worse.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Qbg5kM Tyler Durden

Upside Down World: Junk Bonds Set For Record Winning Streak As High Grade Suffers Worst Year Since 2008

For the latest confirmation of the upside down market, look no further than corporate bonds where the riskiest, CCC-rated junk bonds are set to make a positive return for the 3rd consecutive year, the longest winning streak since records began in 1997.

Not only have the lowest quality junk bonds, those rated CCC or lower, generating respectable absolute returns of 5.8% YTD, they have also outperformed higher quality debt with a 1% total return so far this month, according to Bloomberg and ICE data. Additionally, the lowest rated junk bonds have also outperformed the broader junk bond index, which has returned 1.9% YTD.

And while the key contributor to the outperformance of lowest-rated bonds is demand for, well, higher yielding paper as investors continue to chase returns, a key structural issue has been the lack of HY supply, which at $150 billion YTD is the lowest since 2009.

Meanwhile, as investors scramble for any paper that promises a material yield, regardless of underlying fundamentals, investment grade corporate bond returns have, in the worlds of Bloomberg’s James Crombie “fallen from darling to deadbeat.”

Continuing a theme we first highlighted in June, when we showed the “odd divergence” of IG bonds spreads widening even as junk bond spreads touched record lows…

… junk bonds have continued to enjoy unprecedented demand (and the abovementioned record winning streak) while high grade corporate bonds are set for their worst year since 2008, with returns for the space down 2.34% so far in 2018.

As shown in the chart above, while high-grade bond returns have been mostly positive since the financial crisis, the increasingly hawkish Fed has taken its toll this year, and with three rate hikes in the rear-view mirror and more to come, investors are getting out of low-yielding fixed-rate bonds  – which traditionally underperform in rising rate environments as yields increase across the board – choosing either junk bonds or floating rate loans. No surprise then that the best performing asset classes in credit include high-risk, high-yield CCC debt and floating-rate leveraged loans.

Curiously, the negative returns for IG bonds – which have been largely used to finance another year of record mergers – haven’t resulted in lower demand or slowed new issuance: according to Bloomberg, September was the highest volume month of 2018, with $122.7 billion pricing so far.

As Crombie summarizes these trends, “investors are like all others – they pursue returns. That means more money chasing a limited supply of increasingly risky bonds, and probably an uglier end to this credit cycle.

His Bloomberg macro commentator partner, Seb Boyd adds that “if the Fed halts rate rises, and corporate decision makers collectively take a sober decision to invest in long-term organic growth, then investment-grade corporates will benefit.”

However, if extra Treasury sales push up yields, or late-cycle CEOs look at PE valuations and decide this is a good moment to go shopping, then high-rated bonds are best avoided.

Meanwhile, as junk bond supply remains subdued, the ongoing record wave of mergers, most of which are funded with IG debt, will see no shortage of lower-yielding paper; additionally high grade bonds will increasingly face a lot of competition, especially if the Fed keeps hiking rates and shrinking its balance sheet. This will continue until, eventually, the Fed triggers an “event” that forces a broad market repricing, one which see staggering losses in junk, and forces yield chasers into more safe places along the capital structure.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2xKjOz8 Tyler Durden

BofA Bans Penny Stocks; Customers No Longer Allowed To Buy Or Sell Securities Below $5

Bank of America is cracking down on penny stocks – securities which trade for less than $5, after the bank’s Merrill Lynch initially restricted their purchase in late July, according to CNBC

The bank’s Merrill Lynch division banned purchases of the risky securities in late July, according to the people, who declined to be identified speaking about the move. About six weeks later, the bank abruptly said it was restricting clients’ sales of penny stocks, then amended that policy to give financial advisers more time to exit positions, the people said.  –CNBC

BofA clients received letters this month notifying them that stocks priced under $5 per share with a market cap under $300 million will be subject to regulatory review, according to a copy obtained by CNBC – while clients who wish to sell penny stocks “will experience a delay in execution” due to the review, according to the firm. 

The new policy was enacted “to ensure we are complying with Securities and Exchange Commission regulations and protecting the interests of our clients,” according to spokesman Jerry Dubrowski. “As a result, certain transactions may be subject to restrictions, trading prohibitions or other limitations.” 

Regulators have increasingly made their views of penny stocks known. The SEC’s Division of Economic and Risk Analysis published a white paper in 2016 highlighting the risks of investing in over-the-counter markets. The majority of investors lose money in the trades, and losses worsened for stocks that were the subject of promotional campaigns and those that had weaker disclosures, the SEC said. –CNBC

According to talking points distributed to Merrill brokers, penny stocks are illiquid and can be easily manipulated for fraudulent purposes, while the asset class is “rife with companies with shaky businesses,” according to CNBC

the high volatility of the asset class — in which shares worth a few pennies can rocket in value — invariably lures retail investors. 

That happened in July 2014 with Cynk Technology, when a company with no discernible assets, revenue and a single employee surged from 6 cents a share to $21.95, or a market cap of more than $6 billion. The next year, a Canadian citizen named Philip Kueber was accused by U.S. authorities of engaging in a $300 million stock manipulation fraud. –CNBC

The firm’s 17,442 Financial Advisers have been left scratching their heads. 

“We were told to get rid of them by a certain date,” said one Merrill Lynch broker via CNBC. “I called compliance today to say my client doesn’t want to do that. Now they’re telling me he doesn’t have to sell, but it could be hard to get rid of it down the road.

After their initial ban of most penny stocks, BofA paused the new policy for review, with only the riskiest penny stocks labeled with a “skull-and-crossbones” icon by the firm’s OTC Markets Group, labeling it unavailable for sale. Clients who wish to trade the restricted penny stocks will need to transfer them to another brokerage in order to liquidate the positions. 

BofA is reportedly the first major wirehouse to restrict the purchase of new penny stocks, while their competitors have processes in place for riskier trades. Morgan Stanley and UBS, for example, still allow the purchase of penny stocks. 

In February, BofA banned clients from using credit cards to buy bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, while the firm’s investment banking head, Christian Meissner, reportedly left BofA earlier this month over clashing with CEO Brian Moynihan over the division’s risk appetite. Moynihan has been curtailing the firm’s risky activities after spending much of his tenure doling out billions of dollars in settlements with regulators. 

According to the SEC’s 2016 white paper – low income, retired and less-educated investors were hurt the most by penny stocks. The agency assessed 1.8 million trades by 200,000 investors, finding that the typical return from penny stocks is “severely negative.” 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2N9I826 Tyler Durden

Is Trump Eyeing A Coup In Venezuela?

Authored by Nick Cunningham via Oilprice.com,

The Trump administration and some others in the U.S. government have sent some not-so-subtle hints lately that they are open to a military invasion of Venezuela to oust President Nicolas Maduro.

“It’s a regime that frankly could be toppled very quickly by the military, if the military decides to do that,” President Trump told reporters on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly on Tuesday.

The words seem to offer some encouragement for a coup, which may not come as a surprise because the New York Times published an investigation in early September that found that the Trump administration met secretly with Venezuelan military officers over the last year to discuss an overthrow of Maduro.

Venezuela is in tatters and there have been previous signs that Maduro’s grip is tenuous, including the renegade helicopter pilot earlier this year and the bizarre scene in which drones exploded during a military parade in August near Maduro.

In other words, the threat of a coup has been rising for some time.

But more recently, there have been louder murmurings in Washington and beyond. Bloomberg noted that Fernando Cutz, a former member of the National Security Council, said that a multilateral military invasion of Venezuela might be the best solution. Also, some prominent Venezuelan dissidents and former officials have supported regime change. Florida Senator Marco Rubio said there is a “very strong argument” for such a move. Then there were Trump’s comments in New York at the UN.

Some cautious, but notably receptive comments to an invasion or coup came from officials at the Organization of American States and in the Colombian government, Bloomberg pointed out. Also, Trump is expected to bring in some officials to his government that are notably hawkish in regards to Venezuela.

For now, the U.S. has only officially tried sanctions as a tool of pressure on Maduro. The latest round of sanctions came this week.

“[W] ask the nations gathered here to join us in calling for the restoration of democracy in Venezuela,” Trump said at the UN General Assembly. “Today, we are announcing additional sanctions against the repressive regime, targeting Maduro’s inner circle and close advisors.”

The sanctions once again notably stop short of targeting Venezuela’s oil sector. There has been speculation about whether or not the Trump administration would go as far as to try to disrupt more of Venezuela’s oil supply, since it is already in a steep decline. Cutting off imports from Venezuela or barring the export of U.S. diluent to Venezuela would likely contribute to an acceleration of supply losses. That would surely put more pressure on the Maduro regime, but it would also deepen the existing misery in Venezuela.

But a coup or a military invasion is a whole different matter. The U.S. has a long and sordid history intervening in Latin America, playing a role in the overthrow of governments in Chile, Argentina, Brazil, El Salvador, Guatemala, among others. In fact, much of the legitimacy of Maduro’s Chavista government comes from the political narrative of opposing U.S. imperialism. Maduro’s regime is isolated at this point, due to the horrific humanitarian disaster and the brutal repression. But a U.S. invasion would be highly unwelcome in much of Latin America and could bolster support for Maduro, while potentially shifting the responsibility of Venezuela’s crisis from Maduro to Trump.

The Lima Group, a group of 17 Latin American countries formed in 2017 in order to form a collective response to the Venezuelan catastrophe, issued a declaration in August stating that “only Venezuelans can find a solution to the grave crisis affecting their country,” a diplomatic way of stating their opposition to outside military intervention.

Moreover, an invasion would not necessarily end the chaos.

“You need to have a very strong group of people who can credibly take over, and it’s not clear that there’s a faction in the Venezuelan military or security services that wants that,” Anthony Cordesman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies told Bloomberg.

“So you’re talking about essentially going in and somehow replacing the entire structure of governance and hoping that somehow somebody is going to back you.”

If there is anything that we have learned from the U.S-led military adventures, it’s that they almost never result in the rosy forecasts that war planners put forth.

But, even absent an invasion or a coup, Venezuela’s oil production is heading south. Venezuela’s oil production fell to 1.235 million barrels per day (mb/d) in August, down another 36,000 bpd from a month earlier, according to OPEC’s secondary sources. The losses likely have continued at a similar pace in September, and at this rate, Venezuela’s production could fall below 1 mb/d by the end of the year or in early 2019. “We are entering a very crucial period for the oil market,” the IEA said in mid-September. “The situation in Venezuela could deteriorate even faster.”

via RSS https://ift.tt/2NOojmn Tyler Durden

The Worst Defenses for Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Ford

|||Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/NewscomThe fight to confirm Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh turned into bloody political theater after research psychologist Christine Blasey Ford accused him of holding her down and forcefully groping her at a high school party in the 1980s. Since then, other women have come forward to accuse the judge of past misconduct.

I won’t speculate here about what did or did not happen. But while information is still coming out, we can be responsible in the way that we react to the situation. Here are some of the most nakedly partisan, disingenuous, or completely useless reactions to the confirmation process:

‘Lying skanks’

Fox News contributor Kevin Jackson chose to stand with Kavanaugh by issuing a fiery rebuke to feminism and Kavanaugh’s accusers. This took the form of an impassioned Twitter rant:

Fox has reportedly fired Jackson following the rant.

It doesn’t help anyone to accuse women of lying about sexual assault without explaining why you doubt them, and claiming that women who accuse men of sexual assault are just “skanks” contributes to an environment where victims decide not to report violence out of fear of retaliation.

‘Believe the victims’

Automatically believing women doesn’t make any more sense than automatically refusing to believe them. As Reason‘s Robby Soave has observed, Ford’s accusations have only refueled the mantra “believe the victims.” Mistakes happen; false accusations happen. If you weigh the evidence and conclude that neither has happened in this case, that’s fine. If you just leap to assuming they didn’t happen, that’s a problem. False accusations have stained the history of the American justice system, particularly in the case of white extrajudicial violence against black men. An untold number of black men have been convicted or even lynched after being falsely accused of sexual assault and misconduct.

Needless to say, my point isn’t that Kavanaugh is the victim of a modern-day lynching. It’s that it makes as little sense to assume someone must be guilty as to assume they must be innocent. Belief should never be automatic.

‘Tell me what boy hasn’t done this in high school’

On a CNN panel, a Republican woman said, “We’re talking about a 15-year-old girl, which I respect. I’m a woman, I respect. But we’re talking about a 17-year-old boy, in high school, testosterone running high. Tell me what boy hasn’t done this in high school. Please, I would like to know.”

This woman—and the others who have made arguments like that over the last couple of weeks—seem to be arguing that every high school boy has gotten drunk, pushed a teen girl into a bedroom, and forcefully groped her while keeping his hand over her mouth to prevent her from screaming. It’s one thing to doubt that this happened; it’s another to say that even if it happened it wasn’t a big deal.

A man can’t be a predator if he is supported by women

Kavanaugh was joined by his wife, former presidential aide Ashley Estes Kavanaugh, for a Fox News interview this week. There, she spoke to the character of the man she married.

The Kavanaughs are not the first to use this stand-by-your-man strategy. While several congratulated Kavanaugh’s wife for her outspoken support, others believed she was being used as a prop, especially in moments when her husband appeared to cut her off.

She made a point to say that “this is not at all characteristic. It’s really hard to believe. He’s decent. He’s kind. He’s good. I know his heart. This is not consistent with Brett.” And as his spouse, she’s certainly in a position have insight into his character. But a wife’s absolution of her husband’s alleged crimes isn’t exactly the final word. If it were, the same logic applies would apply to someone like Hillary Clinton, who also helped shield her husband from his accusers.

These defenses of Kavanaugh and Ford do not do justice to either. And they do more harm than good to sexual assault victims and the wrongly accused alike. At the end of the day, only actual evidence will either convict Kavanaugh or clear him.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2xL6daE
via IFTTT

US Intel Officials Publicly Contradict Netanyahu’s UN Speech On “New” Iran Atomic Facility

Netanyahu’s Thursday UN General Assembly speech predictably included the familiar props and visuals condemning Iran over what the Israeli prime minister says is a continuing nuclear program it is hiding from the world’s view. 

Like pretty much all prior Netanyahu speeches focusing on Iran, he held up a physical “evidence” to illustrate his points as he spoke this time it was a “proof” that Iran has yet another secret warehouse holding nuclear-related material in the form of an aerial photograph of the Iranian capital marked with a red arrow pointing to a large building. 

Though this was perhaps a step up from the cartoon bomb performance at the UNGA in 2012, the act is now a fixture and entirely predictable after many others spanning years, barely eliciting much media excitement compared to six years ago. 

But unlike the last number of similar speeches, US intelligence officials have told Reuters that the claims are not true

Jerusalem Post: “Netanyahu has made a name for himself as the “prop master,” using visual aids to underline his message.”

“I am disclosing for the first time that Iran has another secret facility in Tehran, a secret atomic warehouse for storing massive amounts of equipment and materiel from Iran’s secret nuclear program,” Netanyahu said as if breathlessly leading a breaking news press conference. 

He said the site had previously held some 15 kilograms (33 pounds) of radioactive material that has since been moved in a curiously specific claim that would now seem very hard if not impossible to prove given that… well it’s all been moved according to the claims. He called on the UN atomic agency to initiative immediate inspection with Geiger counters. 

“Since we raided the atomic archive, they’ve been busy cleaning out the atomic warehouse. Just last month they removed 15 kilograms of radioactive material. You know what they did with it?” he said. “They took it out and they spread it around Tehran in an effort to hide the evidence.”

PM Netanyahu’s Thursday speech with one of the visuals be brought. UN photo

And on Twitter the Israeli prime minister began making a public appeal in parallel to his speech, asking people to “Google it” and offering the coordinates “35.5022 51.2997. It’s Iran’s secret nuclear warehouse in Tehran. Look for it and share it asking people to.”

Iranian officials were quick to seize upon his once again attempting to persuade through ample use of props and visuals, with Foreign Minister Javad Zarif mocking, “No arts & craft show will ever obfuscate that Israel is only regime in our region with a *secret* and *undeclared* nuclear weapons program – including an *actual atomic arsenal*. Time for Israel to fess up and open its illegal nuclear weapons program to international inspectors.”

And elsewhere foreign ministry spokesman Bahram Qassemi said, “The world will only laugh loudly at this type of false, meaningless and unnecessary speech and false shows,” according to Fars news.

Considering this usual run of events anytime Netanyahu address the UN, the only surprise came later in the day, when Reuters cited US intelligence officials who immediately contradicted the content of his speech.

Reuters called the claims of the freshly revealed purported atomic facility “nothing new” to the Americans, according to an unnamed intelligence source

A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the United States is aware of the facility Netanyahu announced and described it as a “warehouse” used to store “records and archives” from Iran’s nuclear program.

And further citing a second intelligence official, the report continued: 

A second U.S. intelligence official called Netanyahu’s comments “somewhat misleading. First, we have known about this facility for some time, and it’s full of file cabinets and paper, not aluminum tubes for centrifuges, and second, so far as anyone knows, there is nothing in it that would allow Iran to break out of the JCPOA any faster than it otherwise could.”

A separate Israeli media report also noted the contradiction between Netanyahu’s speech and US intelligence: “The claims gainsay the remarks made by Netanyahu, who said that the site, which sits a short distance from Shourabad, contained some 15 kg (33 pounds) of radioactive material that has since been moved.”

Thus it appears the media — including Israeli media aren’t so lockstep in uncritically repeating Netanyahu’s talking points anymore. 

Also on Thursday the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) made more claims connected with the UN speech, tweeting satellite images via its official account that claim Iran is establishing at least three missile factories inside Lebanon in partnership with Hezbollah, specifically in dense civilian neighborhoods of Beirut.

Israel has lately vowed to continue attacking Iranian forces stationed in Syria, and Thursday’s media information and propaganda blitz portend it is prepping for more rounds of strikes. 

With Russia threatening response and now set to deliver the S-300 air defense system to Syria, it could be that Israel sets its sites on these purported Hezbollah “missile factories” on Lebanese soil. 

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2zCIJ9g Tyler Durden