The Bubble Bursts: Vancouver Home Prices Plunge 8.5%, Biggest Annual Drop Since 2009

Authored by Steve Saretsky of VancityCondoGuide

The sudden shift in the Vancouver housing market has been well documented. In November, home sales across all property types sank to a ten year low for the month. The drop is rather unprecedented considering the current economic backdrop suggests unemployment across Canada has plunged to a 42 year low. And while unemployment may be a lagging indicator, the housing market is certainly not. Of the components of GDP, residential investment offers by far the best early warning sign of an oncoming recession.

So too does the yield curve, which continues to flatten. Earlier this week the Canada 2 and 5 year bond yields inverted, for the first time since 2007. A flat or inverted yield curve is when short term rates exceed long-term rates. This is often taken as a signal that investors are more optimistic about short-term prospects versus the long term, suggesting a lack of confidence in continued economic growth. This can also impact bank profitability, as banks pay short-term rates on deposits and take in long-term rates on loans. A flat or inverted yield curve, therefore, could lead to negative net interest margins.

In simpler terms, this can cause bank lending to further tighter, leaving borrowers high and dry when market liquidity is most needed.

While the resulting slowdown from bank lending can most easily be seen in the decline of sales volumes, it is now more noticeably reflecting in home prices. As shown below, the detached home price has now dipped 8.5% from last year, the largest decline since late 2009.

Meanwhile, the resilient condo market has finally dipped into negative territory as well, dropping 1.8% year-over-year in November, the first negative reading since October 2013.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2UEDTAF Tyler Durden

Trump Slams Cohen: “I Never Directed Him To Break The Law”

One day after President Trump’s former attorney, Michael Cohen, was sentenced to three years in prison for a variety crimes, Trump took to Twitter to address alleged campaign finance violations Cohen says he engaged in at Trump’s direction. 

Cohen flipped on Trump after federal agents raided his office and home in April, later making the remarkable claim that Trump directed him to pay off two women who claimed to have had affairs with the president in order to prevent their allegations from influencing the 2016 US election. The payments included $130,000 to porn star Stephanie Clifford (Stormy Daniels), while Cohen also orchestrated a $150,000 payment to a former Playboy playmate through the National Enquirer’s parent company, American Media Inc. (AMI). 

Trump, who initially denied knowing about the payments but later acknowledged that he had known about them, insisted this week that they were “a simple private transaction,” and not related to the election – and therefore would not be subject to campaign finance laws. 

On Thursday, Trump took to Twitter to defend himself and lash out at Cohen in a three-part tweetstorm – claiming Cohen had an obligation to know the law, and that his former personal attorney had pleaded guilty in order to embarrass him and receive a reduced sentence.

“I never directed Michael Cohen to break the law,” Trump said. “He was a lawyer and he is supposed to know the law. It is called “advice of counsel,” and a lawyer has great liability if a mistake is made. That is why they get paid. Despite that many campaign finance lawyers have strongly stated that I did nothing wrong with respect to campaign finance laws, if they even apply, because this was not campaign finance. Cohen was guilty on many charges unrelated to me, but he plead to two campaign charges which were not criminal and of which he probably was not guilty even on a civil bases [sic]. Those charges were just agreed to by him in order to embarrass the president and get a much reduced prison sentence, which he did-including the fact that his family was temporarily let off the hook. As a lawyer, Michael has great liability to me!”

Hours after Cohen’s guilty plea, American Media Inc. admitted responsibility for its role in a $150,000 “catch-and-kill” hush money payment to former Playboy model Karen McDougal, which Cohen negotiated, to keep the story out of the public sphere “and prevent it from influencing the election.” 

According to AMI’s cooperation agreement with federal prosecutors, Cohen and another campaign official met with AMI Chairman and longtime Trump friend David Pecker about the payment around August 2015. 

The company initially said they paid McDougal $150,000 for two years’ worth of her fitness columns, magazine covers and exclusive life rights to any relationship she has had with a then-married man, only to walk that back Wednesday afternoon. 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2SLplgW Tyler Durden

Top 10 Worst Helicopter Parenting Moments of 2018

Sad childKidnapping, Halloween, and snowballs—in 2018, we freaked out about each of these things and many others. Here are the year’s ten most vexing moments for the free-range parenting movement:

1). After a passerby witnessed a man seemingly abducting a little girl in a shopping mall parking lot in Brighton, England, all hell broke loose. Helicopters were scrambled. Cops went door to door. The mall aired the closed-circuit footage over and over again until the man was finally found. No, he wasn’t an abductor: He was the girl’s father. Cops confirmed this. Sorry for the fuss.

2). When Ohio 5-year-old Braylen Carwell started having seizures after trick or treating and tested positive for meth, parents were warned to check for poisoned candy. A few days later, Braylen’s dad, a former drug user, was charged with meth possession and evidence tampering. Said the local police chief, “We are extremely confident that [Braylen] did not ingest any candy from Trick or Treat that was tainted.”

3). Child Protective Services showed up at the home of Corey Widen, a mom in Wilmette, Illinois, after someone reported seeing her daughter, age 8, walking the dog alone. Investigators interrogated Widen, her daughter, other family members, and the girl’s pediatrician before coming to their senses and admitting that mom had not committed neglect.

4). Preschoolers in Nova Scotia were not allowed to play on their playground’s equipment because it was labeled for children ages 5-12. The fact that kids have always played on equipment without an age label (see, for instance, trees) matters not.

5). “A woman is giving a stark warning after she says two women and three men attempted to abduct her daughter at a rest stop on Interstate 74 in Indiana,” announced a TV station in Ohio. This info came from the woman’s Facebook page. In a post, she explained she had been at a rest stop when two ladies looked at her daughter as three men stood in front of a minivan with its door open. The fact that none of them actually attempted an abduction did not get in the way of this juicy non-story.

6). Penn State’s Outing Club can no longer go outside, since hikers typically venture beyond the limits of cell phone coverage. “Student safety in any activity is our primary focus,” said a university spokeswoman. The 98-year-old club is still allowed to hold film festivals host speakers, and explore the great indoors.

7). A school in East London, England, forbid its 1,500 students from touching snow because this could tempt them to make snowballs. To skeptics, headmaster Ges Smith said: “It only takes one student, one piece of grit, one stone in a snowball in an eye, with an injury and we change our view.”

8). Texas writer May Cobb was returning to the car with her autistic 5-year-old after a day in the park when they were stopped by the cops. Someone had reported a boy with messy hair and too-short pants. Even the cops were embarrassed to be following up on this. But follow up they did.

9). A documentary about Patriots’ quarterback Tom Brady showed him kissing his 11-year-old son on the lips. The media went wild. New York’s CBS TV station asked people what they thought. But as one local pointed out, ” Who doesn’t hate Tom Brady here?”

10). Busybodies waved down the police when they saw a boy, age 8 or thereabouts, walking by himself. He told the cops he was going to his grandma’s. He likes walking there. Grandma confirmed this. Police then spoke to his parents about the dangers of letting children walk alone to grandma’s. It is unclear whether they added anything about big bad wolves.

Thankfully, not all the news was bad. This spring, Utah passed America’s first Free-Range Parenting Law, which decreed that parents cannot be considered negligent simply for letting their kids run errands, play outside, wait briefly in the car (under some circumstances), or come home with a latchkey. It’s a start, at least. See you in 2019!

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2Qs12b8
via IFTTT

Euro Slides As Draghi Warns Of “Downside Risks”; Cuts GDP, Inflation Forecasts

As expected, Mario Draghi managed to deliver yet another dovish “end of QE”, because while in less than three weeks the European Central Bank will no longer engage in government bond QE (although it will reinvest maturities for an “unspecified” period of time), the reason the Euro tumbled is that, as previewed overnight by Bloomberg, Draghi not only uttered the magic, for algos, words that the “balance of risks is moving to the downside”, but also cut both the ECB’s GDP and inflation forecasts.

This is the sentence that pushed the Euro lower at first:

“Risks surrounding the euro area growth outlook can still be assessed as broadly balanced. However, the balance of risks [to the growth outlook] is moving to the downside owing to the persistence of uncertainties related to geopolitical factors, the threat of protectionism, vulnerabilities in emerging markets and financial market volatility”

… followed promptly by the cut to both 2018 and 2019 GDP and HICP inflation:

GDP forecasts:

  • 2018 at 1.9% (prev. 2.0%),
  • 2019 at 1.7% (Prev. 1.8%),
  • 2020 at 1.7% (Prev 1.7%),
  • 2021 at 1.5%

HICP forecasts:

  • 2018 at 1.8% (prev. 1.7%),
  • 2019 at 1.6% (Prev. 1.7%),
  • 2020 at 1.7% (Prev 1.7%),
  • 2021 at 1.8%

And visually:

On the other hand, the ECB’s inflation forecast has been roughly in range for the past year.

In kneejerk reaction, the EURUSD tumbled 40 pips and was trading at day lows.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2SMq2GD Tyler Durden

Is The ‘Milkshake Trade’ Finished?

Authored by Kevin Muir via The Macro Tourist,

Think back to this past summer.

The US dollar was rallying hard, having risen from 88 DXY in the spring to 97 as August drew to a close. At the same time, the American stock market was on fire, tacking on 400 S&P points in less than half a year. This was happening while the rest of the world’s stock markets were sucking wind. Europe was down a handful of percentage points, the MSCI world index ex-US was down a similar amount and emerging markets were being beaten like Marvin Nash at the hands of Mr. Blonde. In the period when the S&P had risen almost 10 percent, emerging markets were pushing down 15%. When you combine the meteoric US stock market rise along with the USD appreciation, the relative outperformance of US equities for overseas investors was stunning.

I understand all the reasons for the move. America was the only major country engaging in fiscal stimulus. They were also cutting taxes and engaging in pro-business deregulation. These policies allowed the U.S. Central Bank to pursue a tighter-than-would-otherwise-be-the-case monetary policy.

All of these circumstances combined to create a virtuous self-reinforcing feedback loop. As foreigners chased U.S. stocks, it put a bid to the U.S. dollar and also loosened financial conditions which caused the Federal Reserve to tighten policy which caused the U.S. dollar to rise even more and encouraged foreigners to buy even more stocks. It became reflexive.

Wall Street always does this. They take a good idea, and they push it too far. The US-will-eat-the-world financial theory made a lot of sense… at first.

I am about to embark on a reason to sell US assets, but make no mistake – I am not disputing any of the reasons to own American assets, merely disputing whether those reasons are already in the price. Don’t send me a list of all the reasons why Europe is $%#%’d or why America is the undisputed global super power with a military and economic power unmatched by any rival. I get it.

I understand Santiago Capital’s Brent Johnson’s “Dollar Milkshake Theory” In fact, even though I didn’t agree with Brent’s call, earlier this year (when the whole world was bearish on the US dollar) I brought the loneliness of his prediction to everyone’s attention with a piece titled “US Dollar – Up then down?

…there are others who believe the flow of funds from managers choosing the most attractive destination for their capital means more. My favourite US-dollar-bull-yet-still-gold-bug buddy Santiago Capital’s Brent Johnson created this great presentation outlining his arguments for why the US dollar is poised to rally.

As I was watching, I realized that Brent was one of the few pundits willing to say the US dollar was headed higher – not because of structural problems in the Eurodollar funding market or from a short squeeze in US borrowers paying back money – but because the US is the best economy out there. I might not agree with Brent, but I felt a certain kinship with his lonely call. Often the best trades are the ones where the fewest agree with you. I joked with Brent that it almost made me want to join him on the US dollar long side.

The investor is in me is convinced Luke and Mark are right that the US has entered into a long period of decline, but the fact that MacroVoices couldn’t find a single bull to make the US dollar bull argument makes the trader in me think that Brent is going to be right in the coming weeks and months.

Brent is one of the nicest guys out there, and let’s face it – he stood in there when no one (and I mean no one) was willing to be bullish on the US dollar. Kudos to him. You should all follow Brent, but just be careful when you google him. I am not sure, but there is someone that looks an awful lot like Ricky Gervais rapping and pretending to be Brent.

Actually, come to think about it, has anyone seen Brent and Ricky together in the same room?

Regardless of what Brent does in his spare time (host the Emmys?), his “milk shake theory” has been spot on. America has drunk everyone else’s milkshake. Just like Brent said would happen.

But in digging up the earlier post, it reminded me how lopsided sentiment was back then.

That was then, this is now

Contrast that to the current environment.

If MacroVoices were to have another US dollar round table, I suspect they would have little trouble coming up with dollar bulls. Do you think it would be difficult to find a money manager who believes that US financial assets will outperform the rest of the world?

My guess is that they would be lined up around the block to tell you all the reasons why the rest of the world is a basket case, and that the US is the only safe place to park your money.

Yeah, I get it. The world’s financial landscape inspires little confidence. Brexit, French riots, slumping German banks, Chinese slowdown, emerging market carnage – none of these things scream it’s time to venture out the risk curve.

At the same time, America seems to be making all sorts of positive pro-business-capital-friendly moves. So, money flows into America. After all, who gets fired for buying IBM?

Yet buying American assets is the most over-owned crowded trade out there. Can I prove it with numbers? Nope, but all you have to do is look at the charts.

Do you know how difficult it is for a money manager to sit in front of the year-end-review committee and justify an overweight in European or emerging market equities? I would rather Mr. Blonde have a run at me.

The simple fact is that apart from the most disciplined systematic manager (who is about to get fired), no one is underweight US assets.

Will this change going into year end? I suspect not. In fact, we could even see a little bit of “window dressing” with managers’ desire to show how they got the trade right in 2018 and were in fact overweight US assets. Therefore I suspect the US-relative-bid will stay firm and might in fact push higher into the final trading days of 2018.

Yet, during the next couple of weeks, I will be using any strength in US assets – both equities and US dollars – to sell into.

Against what?

When I tell people I am bearish on US dollars, after they stop laughing, they often ask me – against what? When I tell them against everything, they proceed to lecture me on why those countries are awful places to invest. Yeah, they are probably correct. Europe is a disaster. Japan seems intent on printing their currency into oblivion. Britain can’t seem to do anything right these days. It’s difficult to put your foot down and say, “you should sell US dollar against XYZ currency.” But that’s precisely why everyone is stuffed full of US assets.

If I am correct, then we don’t need these other countries to be terrific investments. All we need is asset allocators to return closer to their benchmark weighting and the US dollar will decline. And in fact, if all this move ends up being is a return from overweight to benchmark, then the currencies that were hated the most – the ones that investors were most eager to sell in exchange for dollars – will be the ones that rise the most.

Something changed

Have a look at both of those relative performance charts above. Do you want to know when they bottomed? Right around October 3rd. You know – the day Powell claimed the US was “still a long way from neutral” (see “Don’t Ingore the Yield Curve).

Powell’s over exuberant tightening was not quite as bad as ECB Chairman’s Jean-Claude Trichet’s disastrous tight money rampage of late 2008 and 2011, but it’s not nearly as benign as the “milkshake bulls” believe.

Something changed October 3rd with Powell’s “quite a ways from neutral” comment. The Federal Reserve finally tightened to a point where it was no longer reflexively positive. Raising rates at that point couldn’t attract anymore capital into the US stock market. It did not cause a positive feedback loop, but instead ushered in a little deflationary mini-wave. More milkshake merely caused the patron to throw up a little in their mouth.

This is my main point. Raising rates from this point will not cause a positive feedback loop, but rather only exacerbate the problems. Capital no longer rushes in to America chasing stocks because everyone is already long.

And the real problem is that these flows over the past year have caused the Federal Reserve to be tighter than would otherwise be the case. Don’t forget that the real reason Powell was so hawkish in that October 3rd speech was because markets were loosening financial conditions regardless of the Fed’s actions.

Powell was rightfully scared that the reflexive nature of the flow of funds into America would cause financial conditions to loosen to inappropriate levels.

Yet without all this money pouring into America desperately trying to have a sip of the “milkshake”, monetary policy would have been easier. Monetary policy was set for financial conditions, not eocnomic conditions. The United States was too successful and in the process have pushed themselves into at least an economic slowdown, and maybe even a recession.

Here comes the pushback

I can already hear the cries of protest. Let’s start with my favourite – the “market has taken out almost all next year’s rate hikes and yet the US dollar is still up” argument. Yeah, that’s a good one. And it’s certainly true that the market has taken out a lot of 2019 hiking in the past month.

Although traders like us might sit around watching every tick, real money moves more slowly. A lot more slowly.

The fact that the market has taken out more than one hike in 2019 over the past month means that the real money has barely reacted. If you are running a large endowment or pension fund, then you aren’t banging out US assets with every tick in Fed Funds futures market. So I don’t buy this argument at all.

Next up is the “Powell is different than other Fed chairs and will not be swayed by each downtick in financial markets.” Really? He has already switched his tune in the space of less than one quarter due to stock market wobbles. I call bullshit on that one.

Well, what if the economy proves more resilient to the recent rate hikes? Then Powell might indeed raise rates and cause the US dollar to rally. This argument I will accept, but let me ask you something – what do you think that a stronger economy (with corresponding tighter monetary policy) does to both the yield curve and stocks? My guess is that the yield curve inverts, stocks sag, and sure, the US dollar rises, but it’s no longer a virtuous rise.

Here is my prediction; US stocks might rise, but only if the greenback falls. The US dollar might rally, but it will snuff out the stock market rally. The days of them both going up together are over. The milkshake glass is empty.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2CbCjPD Tyler Durden

US Import, Export Prices Plunge In November As Fuel Prices Plummet

After re-accelerating in October, US Import and Export price growth slowed dramatically in November to the lowest since Nov 2016 and July 2017 respectively…

Import prices fell 1.6% MoM (well below expectations of a 1.0% decline) slamming the YoY growth to just +0.7%.

Export prices also fell, down 0.9% MoM (well below the -0.3% expectation) pushing the YoY gains to just +1.8%.

Under the hood:

  • Import prices ex-petroleum fell 0.3% after rising 0.2% in Oct.

  • Import prices ex-food and fuel rose 0.4% y/y in Nov.

  • Import fuel prices fell 11%, most since Jan. 2016, after a 3.2% increase in Oct.

  • Industrial supplies prices fell 5.3% after rising 1.4% in Oct.

  • Auto prices unchanged after no change in Oct.

  • Consumer goods prices unchanged after falling 0.3% in Oct.

As China’s import price index slumps, exporting the most deflation since 2007…

 

Dear Jay Powell, still want to hike rates next week?

via RSS https://ift.tt/2QvcFOD Tyler Durden

Watch Live: Mario Draghi Explain How Dovish The End Of ECB QE Is

Having slashed both growth and inflation outlooks,  one could be forgiven for wondering why ECB President Mario Draghi would choose now to stop its massive bond-buying program (which has done so much good for the European economy and markets)…

With stocks and the euro weak, Draghi will do his utmost to crush any reporters’ efforts to shift The ECB’s actions narrative in a hawkish direction.

“I got this…”

And here is what The ECB looks like on Bloomberg’s Hawk-Dove-o-meter:

Watch live (starting at 0830ET) to see Draghi talk his way out of this…

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Gc1RQE Tyler Durden

Will Uprisings Thwart Green Central Planners? New at Reason

You know you’ve got a problem when your tax schemes are even being rejected by the French, writes Veronique de Rugy. While there’s always a danger in reducing the causes of political unrest to a single issue, the plan to impose yet another regressive $9 billion annual carbon tax proved to be a catalyst for the “yellow vest” protests that are roiling Paris.

The nonviolent version of the French carbon-tax revolt is spreading globally, too. Last November, Washington state voters rejected a very well-funded effort to pass the first ballot-approved carbon tax ever. The province of Ontario is suing the Canadian government to block a federal carbon tax there. This resistance comes from middle- to low-income workers, de Rugy explains. They’re especially sensitive to changes in the cost and availability of energy for the simple reason that it affects so many aspects of their lives—from getting to work, especially for those who live in rural areas, to the price of most consumer goods. It’s clear that many ordinary people aren’t willing to pay higher costs just to fulfill the grand visions of green central planners.

View this article.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2zY55BU
via IFTTT

Blain: “Italy Is Not Going To Cut The Deficit Number. It Simply Says It Will”

Blain’s Morning Porridge submitted by Bill Blain

“I put them with my own, can’t make it all alone, I’ve built my dreams around you.”

As I said yesterday; if May wins the UK remains a SELL.

She won her confidence vote, but, the essential reality is 2 in 5 Conservative MPs oppose her. As a result, nothing will be solved about Brexit. The latest polls broadly suggest the UK is hung 50/50 leave/remain, but break it down and it’s still 50% remain, but 25% of leavers who would accept the current deal are vehemently opposed by the 25% who’d prefer a no deal Brexit. That’s the critical political fault line exposed by yesterday’s vote.

These are the numbers party strategists will be making their calculations upon. Every politician is each assessing their own chances and opportunities. The UK is now a game of political optimisation.

Pro-Brexit MPs with leave majorities should be concerned – their vote is split. For MPs sitting on Remain majorities or even modest minorities, their political maximization strategy is probably to align with Remain as the Leave vote becomes increasingly fractured, split and disenchanted. The extreme Brexiteers will fulminate, get angry, drop their allegiances, and waste their votes on the extreme right or whatever Nigel Farage comes up with.. 25% of the electorate will win one or two seats at the next election. Discount them.

The exact numbers are something we need to analyse in terms of individual MPs, on a party to party basis, at a constituency parliamentary and referendum level – I’ve got someone in mind to work on it.

Smart investors should be able to make some educated guesses how these scenarios play out… and thus: when to buy into a cheap UK. More than happy to discuss timing…

My own guess is we’re likely to see a parliamentary shift towards Remain and even a second referendum – simply on the basis that’s where MPs are likely to see the best chance of holding onto their jobs. Democracy be damned. (For clarity – I am a soft Brexiteer. I’d accept the current deal and move on! I think a second referendum would be abject surrender.)

We’re likely to see further Brexit-led instability, but little new, through Jan into Feb. No compromise from Europe. Then, as the deadline approaches, I expect Theresa’s final act will be for the  UK to step back and delay Brexit – citing the need for more time to avoid the No Deal (which only 25% support). The EU will graciously allow us more time, even suggest we pause or annul Article 50. They know the argument is heading their way if they exhibit patience.

Then we head towards inevitable elections – Theresa May will be gone. She will be persuaded to step down to let a “strong and stable” leader take over.. (something familiar about that phrase…?). Who? Does it matter? I suspect the prospect of electoral suicide means the Tories won’t vote for a prominent Brexiteer. Will the party split? Who knows? Who cares? It would have serious impact on our electoral calculations.

Voter disenchantment with the Tories – or the BSBP (back-stabbing b******s party) – is very real. At least Boris has learnt to keep his mouth shut. The minister for the 19th Century might care to take note. Smart Tories are making positive sounds about listening. I suspect fear of a Labour Government means an election isn’t likely to lead to electoral cataclysm for the Tories (although it’s a very attractive thought). A good chum is quoted in the WSJ this morning saying: “a Jeremy Corbyn government is far worse than any Brexit or no Brexit,” and “It would be apocalyptic for the economy.”

Of course it would.. Wouldn’t it? Would Labour really be that bad? Momentum, to be frank, controls far fewer seats than its given credit for, and is running out of “momentum”.. All it needs is for grass roots labour supporters to support moderates. Corbyn’s ability to deliver his Red policies on nationalisation etc will be extremely limited by the parliamentary party which remains vehemently opposed to him. Even momentum candidates know their electorates objectives are not the same as the 40 unwashed Trotskyites that won them the right to stand.   

When it comes to Labour, the Trend is our Friend. Every time Labour wanders too far left, it eventually goes into autocorrect – and swings back right. Think about Militant and Clause 4 last century! What we really need is a sans Blair Blairite revolution. That’s why I mentioned David Miliband yesterday. The Time is Now! If Labour could get a palatable leadership in place in the next few months they are assured of power. As might a new soft centre party.. there’s a thot!

I’m just a market commentator. I’m not a political pundit. But it’s clear the current unresolvable political environment creates a series of very interesting market outcome scenarios. All of which means the UK remains uncertain, and markets hate uncertainty – except to the extent it generates wonderful volatility to gamble against!

Don’t expect this to end any time soon.

Meanwhile, back in the real world..

I have to laugh at Macron’s France blithely breaking EU debt guidelines while Italy is forced to put new policies in place to get their budget deficit back in line at 2.04%. Actually, that’s bullsh*t. Italy is not going to cut the deficit number. It simply says it will. That’s not quite same thing. More on where European Govt spreads are going next week. Meanwhile, what is Draghi going to say about the end of QE? As Europe sinks towards recessions… I’m sure he’ll find some other way to deluge the continent in free money to keep the happy party going…

The German govt is apparently keen for Commerz and Deutsche to merge. That will be the end of Finanzplatz Deutscheland. Merging two troubled banking dinosaurs to create a larger basketcase is a recipe for years of conflict as their competing cultures of mediocracy duke it out. Sorry to be harsh… but in recent years neither bank has been batting in doubt digits. What about the European dream? Domestic mergers like this are born from political protectionism. There still isn’t a single successful example of pan-European banking – and don’t quote me Santander.. there are sound reasons they kept The Shabby-Abbey.

What to say about the US? Who would you trust? Michael Cohen or Donald Trump? Or neither?

via RSS https://ift.tt/2C9C47R Tyler Durden

GE Soars 12% As ‘Biggest Bear’ Upgrades Stock To “Neutral”

A day after collapsing to the ominous $6.66 March 2009 closing lows, GE stock is soaring in the pre-market after long-time bear JPMorgan analyst Steve Tusa upgrades the company to neutral from underweight.

Citing the fact that the liabilities and “known unknowns” are better understood and priced into the stock price, Tusa (who has been a “sell” since May 2016) wrote that:

“We believe a more negative outcome on these liabilities (equity dilution, for one) is at least partially discounted, and it’s possible that the company can execute its way through an elongated workout that limits near-term downside,”

And that was good enough to juice the stock up 12% in the pre-market…

 

Still, he warned that a reset in free cash flow expectations may be necessary, even as it could provide a bottom for the stock.

Additionally, as Bloomberg reports, GE Digital said it would sell a majority stake in its ServiceMax cloud-based field-service software to Silver Lake and create a new industrial Internet-of-things firm with starting annual revenue of $1.2 billion.

As one wise old equity trader said to us on the news of another bottom-caller – “It can’t get any worse… right?” – well it can still fall 100% more from her.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2QMandn Tyler Durden