WTI Extends Losses After Failed Missile Attack, Big Crude Build

WTI Extends Losses After Failed Missile Attack, Big Crude Build

Oil prices surged overnight after API’s surprise draw and headlines about a Houthi missile attack on Aramco facilities, but after tagging unchanged from Friday’s close (erasing the post-virus drop), comments that all missiles were intercepted sent prices lower and refocused traders’ attention on the potential for an imminent demand crisis due to the ‘Devil’-Virus spreading across the world.

Refinery utilization rates have been sluggish for this time of year, says Bob Iaccino, market strategist at Path Trading Partners:

“If refineries are not operating at capacity, it’s because they don’t have the demand, a lower draw or a build could make the demand fear worse”

So all eyes once again revert to inventories..

API

  • Crude -4.27mm (+500k exp)

  • Cushing +1.02mm (-870k exp)

  • Gasoline +3.27mm (+1.3mm exp)

  • Distillates -141k (-1.1mm exp)

DOE

  • Crude +3.548mm (+500k exp)

  • Cushing +758k (-870k exp)

  • Gasoline +1.203mm (+1.3mm exp)

  • Distillates -1.289mm (-1.1mm exp)

A big surprise crude draw from API was not enough to trump china demand fears but the official data from DOE shows a much bigger than expected 3.548mm crude build

Source: Bloomberg

As Bloomberg warns, the world is swimming in refined products. Gasoline stockpiles hit a seasonal high in data going back 29 years in last week’s report. Demand is likely to be soft, especially if we see a big slowdown in exports to Asia as fears persist about the coronavirus.

US Crude production remains at a record high, as forward-looking rig-counts begin to stabilize after their collapse…

Source: Bloomberg

WTI had dropped back to just above $43 before the DOE data – close the levels before API’s surprise draw was reported.

Finally, as Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Energy Analyst Vince Piazza explains, measured against the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak, the coronavirus situation in China will have a larger absolute effect but about the same effect on a relative basis.

Daily demand may be curtailed by more than 200,000 barrels vs 100,000 in the earlier incident, but China now accounts for 15% of global use vs 7% in 2003.

U.S. exports and therefore inventories may show a more marked effect, however, as China is now more integrated into the global economic system.


Tyler Durden

Wed, 01/29/2020 – 10:36

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2RBdvYS Tyler Durden

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.