Chrysler Building’s EU Co-Owner Goes Bankrupt 

Chrysler Building’s EU Co-Owner Goes Bankrupt 

Europe may be experiencing its most significant real estate meltdown since the global financial crisis. The abrupt ending of easy monetary policies and soaring interest rates have led the property and retail conglomerate Signa Holding GmbH to declare bankruptcy following its inability to secure funding. 

Bloomberg reports that Signa, also the co-owner of New York’s Chrysler building, has assets upwards of $25 billion as of the end of 2022. It filed for insolvency in Vienna on Wednesday. 

“Despite considerable efforts in recent weeks, the necessary liquidity for an out-of-court restructuring could not be sufficiently secured,” the company said.

Signa’s current debt load totaled around $5.5 billion, according to creditor representative KSV1870. There are over 273 creditors impacted by the proceedings. 

“From today’s standpoint, it’s impossible to predict whether further companies of the Signa Group will file for insolvency and whether it will lead to a domino-effect,” said Karl-Heinz Götze, the head of insolvencies at the group.

Austrian tycoon Rene Benko heads Signa, which has commercial real estate properties across Europe and is a co-owner of New York’s Chrysler building. 

Austrian chancellor Karl Nehammer played down the collapse of Signa. He said, “What’s really important is that all those who invested here, especially the banks, stay stable.” 

Earlier this week, analysts at Austria’s Raiffeisen Bank International, one of Signa’s top creditors, warned that the fallout might spark further CRE turmoil if properties must be offloaded. 

“The aim is to continue business operations within the framework of self-administration,” Signa said.

Bloomberg sources said Signa has been ‘frantically’ searching for $650 million in short-term liquidity, reaching out to Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund and Elliott Investment Management, among others. 

The crash of Signa comes as global central banks have likely concluded the most aggressive interest rate tightening cycle in a generation to tame hot inflation. Fed swaps show interest rate cuts are forecasted to begin as early as May. 

Furthermore, we don’t need to expand on the CRE crisis as readers are well-informed about the rumblings this year. We leave you with a recent interview featuring Goldman’s Allison Nathan and Scott Rechler, Chairman and CEO of RXR Realty. 

Rechler told Nathan that the crisis in the CRE space was just beginning.

Recall in March, when several regional banks imploded, we noted “Why Small Banks Are In Big Trouble: As Hedge Funds Pile Into The New “Big Short,” The Next’ Credit Event’ Emerges.” 

So what are the contagion risks with the implosion of Signa? 

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/01/2023 – 16:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/Mv8LeGW Tyler Durden

Back To 2-And-A-Half Wars?

Back To 2-And-A-Half Wars?

Authored by John Mills via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A plaque of the Department of Defense seal is seen at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 26, 2012. (Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images)

Commentary

An overarching tenet for decades in the American national security planning environment was the ability for the U.S. military to simultaneously conduct two-and-a-half major regional conflicts (MRCs).

Translated, this meant that the United States had the military size to generate and project military force for a major conflict in the European area, a major conflict in the Asian area, and a smaller “brushfire” conflict somewhere else. Going back 30 years, the 1993 “Bottom Up Review” was the seminal Department of Defense planning document that defined the beginning of the pivot away from this classic Cold War viewpoint to a new, post-Soviet era one.

The budget process descended into decades of arguing that to pay for new systems, force structure had to be diminished. The flip side of the argument was that peacekeeping requirements (Bosnia, Rwanda, etc.), as well as the massive increase in deployment cycles brought on by the War on Terror, prevented the diminishment of the number of military units.

This led to an unsolvable impasse on the topic. New systems had a bill that could only be paid by cutting units and military personnel. Units and military personnel couldn’t be cut because of the demands of the deployment cycle.

And now the world seems to have descended into a real situation of two-and-a-half conflicts without seeking permission from the force structure planning community.

China Threat Re-awakening This National Security Imperative

The war in Ukraine drags on, but with some momentum perceptible as Ukrainian forces appear to have established a firm beachhead across the Dnipro River in a drive toward Crimea. After decades of relative peace, now the Middle East is inflamed as Israel strikes into the Gaza Strip to destroy Hamas terrorists while holding additional Iranian-backed proxies in southern Lebanon, Syria, the West Bank, and Houthi missile fire from Yemen in check. Meanwhile, there’s the specter of even greater conflict in the possibility of strategic strikes as Iran threatens Israel (and America).

In the two-and-a-half MRC calculus, it’s not clear whether these contagions are the “two-and-a-half,” or even possibly the “two-and-a-half-plus,” of the retro MRC worldview.

Hamas and the Houthis are proxies for Iran; Iran is a proxy for China. Russia, mired in the death and destruction it created, is a proxy for China. In December 2021, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin met virtually, weeks before Russia invaded Ukraine, and agreed to a “no limits” partnership to topple American leadership of the world system.

Tensions in the Pacific have increased as China has greatly elevated its military exercises—demonstrations toward Taiwan and the Philippines. The Fiscal Year 2023 National Defense Authorization Act and related appropriations greatly increased American military spending while making numerous declarative statements of support for Taiwan, which has significantly displeased China.

Air Force and Navy in the Lead

With the upward trajectory of the American defense budget and the existence of an ongoing or building two-and-a-half-plus MRC world whether we like it or not, the question is, what force structure strategy and policy should be in effect?

The common outcome of the national security budget debate is what’s called “salami slicing,” where all military services and requirements take equal cuts or equal plus-ups. This is often the normalcy of the defense debate within and between the executive and legislative branches of the U.S. government.

With the surging two-and-a-half-plus MRC world, intuitive priorities come to the forefront. The American border should be the first priority, and, beyond that, capabilities and force structure that can project deterrence and, if necessary, war-winning capabilities should receive the highest priorities for a unified joint operational concept. These are more resident in air, naval, space, cyber, and special operations domains, with a special emphasis on artificial intelligence-enabled autonomous systems.

The Army and Marines will have a key role in the burgeoning two-and-a-half-plus MRC world, and they need to find where they create the best value as “supporting” services to the primary “supported” services who should be in the lead. The Army has made bold moves toward this in its multi-domain doctrine development, which emphasizes long-range fires, rejuvenated air and missile defense capabilities, and a return to strong operational experience and capabilities in maritime and amphibious operations.

The Army and the Marine Corps have similar interests and should work closely together in partnership to develop a larger and more capable maritime transport capability of smaller vessels that complement the Navy’s larger amphibious warfare ship structure and robust special operations capabilities. The Army should retain a world-class armored force capability but ensure it’s postured for maximum ability to be in the right place at the right time. The rest of the conventional “Big” Army may have to shrink somewhat to ensure the priorities are properly resourced.

Countering Unrestricted Warfare

The Chinese Communist Party is achieving some success in its worldwide campaign of unrestricted warfare to include civil-military fusion, Belt and Road influence operations, and pernicious and deadly adjuncts such as fentanyl production in northern Mexico that is introduced into American society on a broad scale in an “Opium War” initiative to destabilize American society. This implies that the American solution must be whole-of-government and inclusive of key strategic partners.

The historic challenges of military recruiting and retention need to be addressed in an open and honest dialogue that addresses all core causal factors that can no longer be dismissed. Even the U.S. Coast Guard is achieving a striking inability to deploy ships: It has the budget and equipment, but it doesn’t have the personnel—an extremely perplexing inverse of the world they have lived in for years.

The two-and-a-half MRC world is only growing, and the best response is to build the right capabilities to deter the developing storm as fast as possible.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/01/2023 – 16:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/uOrEdCI Tyler Durden

Henry Kissinger’s Deadly Career Gives the Lie to the Myth of the Disinterested Statesman


reason-kissinger | Piero Oliosi/Polaris/Newscom

In the opening pages of his 1994 book Diplomacy, Henry Kissinger recounts a famous, possibly apocryphal quote from Pope Urban VIII upon hearing of the death of Cardinal Richelieu, chief minister to Louis XIII and mastermind of French foreign policy during the 30 Years’ War.

“If there is a God, the Cardinal de Richelieu will have much to answer for. If not… well, he had a successful life,” said the pope, according to Kissinger’s telling.

It’s a quote that could easily apply to Kissinger himself, who died Wednesday night after a long, distinguished, and controversial (some would say criminal) career as a diplomat, writer, and intellectual proponent of an aggressive, ultracynical version of realist foreign policy.

By one set of secular metrics, Kissinger did indeed have a very successful life. He died in his bed at the age of 100 after attaining wealth, fame, and an inarguable place in American history. And in the next life, he certainly has a lot to answer for.

The obituaries coming out this week highlight much of what Kissinger will need to account for: helping to scuttle an early peace in Vietnam; secret, illegal carpet bombings of neutral Cambodia; direct involvement in the overthrow of Chilean President Salvador Allende; and his support for various genocidal campaigns of American Cold War allies, to name a few.

The fact that the Pope Urban quote was allegedly one of Kissinger’s favorite anecdotes says a lot about how the man viewed his life’s work and how it would stack up against any sort of divine final judgment.

But Kissinger’s purpose for including the quote in Diplomacy was less about psychological self-evaluation and more about articulating his own vision of international affairs.

By Kissinger’s telling, Richelieu was the first practitioner of modern realpolitik. At home, the Catholic clergyman was an archopponent of the Reformation and an eager persecutor of France’s Protestants. In foreign affairs, he was more than happy to ally with Protestant states to check the power of the rival Catholic Hapsburg monarchy.

That seeming contradiction made perfect sense to Kissinger. States and the people who live in them might have their own values and domestic projects. But those domestic goals were always threatened by other states who might seek to dominate them.

In an anarchic dog-eat-dog world of rival powers and no higher authority to seek protection from, states and statesmen had to take what actions were necessary to secure their own existence and power.

This is the basic premise of the realist school of international relations. Reasonable libertarians in good standing can often differ on how compelling they find it.

The most relevant criticism of it in regards to Kissinger himself would be the standard insight from public choice theory: Statesmen and diplomats, like everyone else, are selfish individuals with no special ability to perceive and work toward a national interest separate from their own.

Most bureaucrats in the Education Department are as interested in their own power and influence as they are in educating children. The same is true of most bureaucrats in the State Department.

While Kissinger might argue that all the seemingly abhorrent policies he pursued during his career were necessary to secure America’s national interest, his actions conspicuously always aligned with his own accumulation of power and prestige.

Spencer Ackerman, writing at Rolling Stone, recounts the now standard narrative of how Kissinger undermined President Lyndon Johnson’s peace initiative in Vietnam, not because he thought a more advantageous deal was in the cards but because a failed peace process would make it more likely he’d get a plum job in the next administration.

The consequence was four more years of war and thousands upon thousands of additional deaths.

Whatever insights Kissingerian realism might have about the conduct of international affairs, it all too easily can be used as an excuse to do some truly awful and nasty things.

To be sure, some of the left-wing obituaries of Kissinger arguably overstate his insidiousness and impact.

Ackerman’s back-of-the-envelope math argues that Kissinger is personally responsible for killing three to four million people during his career. That would seem to let a lot of other people off the hook for their own role in the Cold War’s body count. (Does the communist government of North Vietnam not also bear some responsibility for the death toll of the Vietnam War?)

Similarly, it’s a little difficult to wholly swallow the moral outrage of socialist magazine Jacobin over Kissinger’s career (they’ve produced book-length “anti-obituary” of him) given how eager its writers are in other contexts to minimize, excuse, and explain away the crimes of communist governments he was combating.

It takes two to tango, and Kissinger’s own ruthless foreign policy would have gotten a much less sympathetic hearing if half the globe wasn’t dominated by totalitarian communist regimes killing their way to a worker’s utopia.

Perhaps the best thing that one can say about Kissinger’s brand of realism is that there was at least some limiting principle to it.

States should pursue their own power and influence, nothing more, nothing less. For all the bad things that logic inspired, it also saw Kissinger pursue better relations with the Soviet Union and Communist China.

Some Cold War hawks at home might have hated détente, but Kissinger rightly reasoned that learning to live in a world with these countries was better than constantly teetering on the brink of nuclear war while we tried to make them go away.

Similarly, his realism led him to oppose some of the military adventurism of liberal internationalists in the post–Cold War world. He was an archcritic of President Bill Clinton’s intervention in Kosovo, for instance.

Kissinger did offer a relatively sunny assessment of the case for invading Iraq and the fruits that would come from it. But he was also prescient enough to warn against the idea, popular amongst neoconservatives in and outside the Bush administration, that the country could be turned into a wellspring of democracy with little effort.

“If war should prove unavoidable, it will not be a time for experiments. The longer military operations last, the greater the danger of upheavals in the region, dissociation by other nations and American isolation,” he wrote in a 2002 essay.

None of this is meant to defend Kissinger’s generally terrible legacy. Many, many people came to needlessly violent ends because of the way he wielded his power and influence.

As a new set of American hawks ramps up tensions with China and pushes for an endless commitment to the war in Ukraine, it’s worth recognizing the ways that even amoral realpolitik has its own set of limiting principles. And those limits often stopped short of where some more “idealistic” modern interventionists would take us.

The post Henry Kissinger's Deadly Career Gives the Lie to the Myth of the Disinterested Statesman appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/fdSQpAk
via IFTTT

Short Circuit: A Roundup of Recent Federal Court Decisions

Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature written by a bunch of people at the Institute for Justice.

New on the Short Circuit podcast: private rights of action to enforce voting rights and a failed attempt to get Donald Trump kicked off the ballot in New Hampshire on insurrection grounds.

  • “The sole issue before us”—says the D.C. Circuit in these suits brought by several members of Congress and Capitol Police officers—”is whether President Trump has demonstrated an entitlement to official-act immunity for his actions leading up to and on January 6 as alleged in the complaints.” And, at least at the pleadings stage, he has not; the suit may proceed.
  • Allegation: After getting the okay from a superior, Gloucester, Mass. harbormaster, a city employee, testifies in a private capacity as an expert witness (in a tragic case about a botched open-sea rescue). His testimony displeases the Massachusetts Lobstermen’s Association. Seeking to stay in the lobstermen’s good graces, the mayor punishes and harasses the harbormaster in numerous ways, involving much profanity and a suggestion that she’ll have her relatives break his kneecaps. Retaliation for his protected speech? First Circuit: Who can say what the law is? Qualified immunity.
  • Former CEO of The Federal Savings Bank is convicted under the financial institution bribery statute for securing millions in loans for former Trump presidential campaign chair Paul Manafort in exchange for a position in the federal government. (He wanted Secretary of the Army but was willing to settle for undersecretary; he ultimately got nothing.) On appeal, the former banker argues that his conduct wasn’t “corrupt,” nor was a recommendation for a government gig a “thing of value.” Second Circuit: Conviction affirmed.
  • Sovereign citizen family disputes South Carolina’s plan to expand a road onto their property. This leads to a standoff resulting in the death of two police officers. The son is sentenced to death, the mother life in prison, and the father sent to a mental institution due to his dementia. The South Carolina Supreme Court upholds the son’s death sentence by a 3-2 vote. And he has even less success in the federal courts, where the Fourth Circuit refuses his efforts to revisit its previous habeas rejection.
  • In common-law jurisdictions, we call people who do things on your behalf without having first obtained your authority “officious intermeddlers,” and you’re not required to pay them back. But under Louisiana’s civil-law code, they’re called gestors, and under the ancient doctrine of negotiorium gestio, you can sometimes be forced to pay them back. But how does this unique doctrine stemming from Roman law interact with modern-day Louisiana conservation law regarding forced oil and gas drilling? Fifth Circuit: Who the hell knows?! Let’s ask the Louisiana Supreme Court. Dissent: This is actually an easy question; negotiorium gestio doesn’t apply.
  • Shreveport, La. police investigate a burglary at a rental property and turn up no leads. A handyman hired by the property manager to come fix things up cuts himself on a broken window. When the police return, they find his blood and have him arrested for the burglary. He spends three years in jail or on house arrest before being acquitted for lack of evidence. Malicious prosecution? Fifth Circuit (unpublished): On these allegations, the police were sufficiently reckless in omitting critical information from the arrest warrant that the case can proceed.
  • Fifth Circuit (last week, unpublished): It is unconstitutional to sic a police dog without warning on an unarmed, unthreatening suicidal person during a welfare check. But plaintiff loses because officers couldn’t have been expected to know that. Fifth Circuit (this week, published): They can be expected to know that now, though.
  • The 16th-century Swiss physician/alchemist Paracelsus—known as the father of toxicology—famously observed that it is the dose alone that makes the poison (sola dosis facit venenum). Something to bear in mind regarding this class action on behalf of everyone in the United States whose blood contains 0.05 parts per trillion or more of per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)—a class that comprises everyone in the United States. Sixth Circuit: But the named plaintiff has not shown that any of the 10 companies he sued—out of the thousands that have manufactured PFAS—are responsible for the trace amounts of five PFAS found in his bloodstream. Case dismissed.
  • Everybody knows that the Chevron doctrine is about to join the dodo bird in its present roosting grounds. But until that happens lower courts are still beholden to its talons—as well as the talons of cases decided back when Chevron was as American (and conservative) as bubble gum and ice cream. While is why the Sixth Circuit (over a dissent) just applied Chevron and Rust v. Sullivan (1991) to regulations interpreting how Congress has dictated what medical providers can do and say vis-à-vis abortion when receiving certain federal funds.
  • Allegation: After federal prisoner who had cooperated with the gov’t filed a grievance against a guard—and then complained when the grievance was shown to that guard, in violation of prison rules—the prisoner’s case manager intentionally housed him with violent, non-cooperating prisoners who beat him up. He files a Bivens claim. Seventh Circuit: The Supreme Court told us to stop doing those. Dissent: However much the Court hates Bivens, there’s an on-point decision here, and we’re bound by it.
  • Bankruptcy shenanigans alert! In Illinois, Scheming Partner and Hapless Partners start a business and take out a bank loan. Business flops, and bank seeks to collect on the loan in state court. Scheming Partner then buys the debt from the bank and tries to collect it against Hapless Partners in state court. One Hapless Partner declares bankruptcy, and a federal bankruptcy court lets him off the hook. But do the prior state-court proceedings preclude the bankruptcy court from doing that? Seventh Circuit: If you think the facts of this case are complicated, wait until you read this opinion’s procedural discursions on Rooker-Feldman, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. But bottom line: What the bankruptcy court did was fine, and Scheming Partner’s mischievous plan comes to naught.
  • Georgia’s Public Service Commission consists of five members who are elected through statewide, at-large elections. Does this makeup — instead of one with five single-member districted elections — unlawfully dilute votes under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act? Eleventh Circuit: No. Concluding otherwise would result in the first ever holding that a statewide election constituted vote dilution, and it “strains both federalism and Section 2 to the breaking point.”
  • And in en banc news, much of the Third Circuit despairs that it cannot in good conscience reconsider its decision that a conviction under Pennsylvania’s law of aggravated assault does not qualify as a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act.
  • And in more en banc news, the Fifth Circuit will reconsider its decision, based on earlier precedent, that districts can count as “majority minority” under the Voting Rights Act if one aggregates more than one minority group together. This is hardly surprising given that the panel in this latest case said the precedent was “wrong as a matter of law.”
  • And in additional en banc news, the Eleventh Circuit will reconsider its decision granting resentencing to a Florida man on the grounds that the district judge who revoked his parole for a federal wire-fraud conviction failed to adequately explain why he sentenced the man to 20 years instead of the guidelines recommended 12-18 months. The panel had held that resentencing was mandatory under circuit precedent even though—as Chief Judge Pryor pointed out concurring in the original panel opinion and calling for en banc rehearing—everyone knows the reasons for the upward departure is that this guy was convicted in state court of murdering his girlfriend and hiding her body in a 55-gallon drum.

The U.S. Constitution explicitly protects economic liberty with the Contract Clause, forbidding any state from passing any “law impairing the obligation of contracts.” Unfortunately, it’s largely been a dead letter since Home Building & Loan Ass’n v. Blaisdell (1934), a case where it’s widely recognized SCOTUS just made stuff up. Well, 40 state constitutions have their own contract clause. So their courts must have rejected Blaisdell, at least at times, right? Unfortunately, as Anthony Sanders details for the Brennan Center’s State Court Report, state courts have almost always gone along with SCOTUS. He also explains why that’s a problem.

The post Short Circuit: A Roundup of Recent Federal Court Decisions appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/Ss5WLfC
via IFTTT

Powell’s Dovish Comments Send Everything Soaring, Gold Hits All Time High As Dollar Plummets

Powell’s Dovish Comments Send Everything Soaring, Gold Hits All Time High As Dollar Plummets

After November’s furious meltup, which saw the S&P rise by 9% (the Nasdaq was up an even more ludicrous 11%), which was the best November for the stock market since 1980…

… all eyes were on Jerome Powell today to see if the Fed chair would say something to stem the surging stock market tide following the month which saw the biggest easing in financial conditions on record, equivalent to nearly 4 rate cuts.

We got the answer shortly after 11am ET, when after what seemed to be otherwise balanced remarks with a dose of hawkish comments…

“It would be premature to conclude with confidence that we have  achieved a sufficiently restrictive stance, or to speculate on when  policy might ease. We are prepared to tighten policy further if it becomes appropriate to do so.”

… offset by some clearly dovish statements…

“The strong actions we have taken have moved our policy rate well into restrictive territory, meaning that tight monetary policy is putting downward pressure on economic activity and inflation. Monetary policy is thought to affect economic conditions with a lag, and the full effects of our tightening have likely not yet been felt.”

… and generally sounding rather optimistic while answering student questions, saying that the US is on the path to 2% inflation without large job losses – i.e., a soft landing – which helped the market to convince itself that Powell had just given the green light for a continued market meltup (thanks to the blackout period, there will be no more Fed comments until the Dec 13 FOMC) as Bloomberg put it…

“Powell points to how the Fed’s past tightening moves will continue to have an impact on the economy — the full impact hasn’t been felt yet. If anybody thought the Fed wasn’t finished raising rates, his prepared remarks today sure put a fork in it. They are done.”

…. and what happened next was a violent repricing in easing odds, with March rate cut odds hitting a lifetime high of 80%, effectively doubling overnight and up from 10% just 5 days ago…

… which then immediately cascaded across assets and sent everything exploding higher, led by stocks which surged above 4,600 for the first time since the July FOMC (aka the “final rate hike”)…

…passing through the bond market, and especially 2-Year yields, which tumbled a whopping 12bps to 4.56%…

… and on course for the biggest weekly slide since the regional banking crisis in March, down almost 40bps.

Yet neither stocks, nor bonds, had quite as much fun as either “digital gold”, with Bitcoin briefly hitting a fresh 2023 high, briefly surging to $39,000 before easing back with Ether rising to $2100 …

… but the biggest winner by far from today’s market conclusion that a renewed dollar destruction is on deck, was gold which briefly rose above its all time high of $2,075…

… and that’s just the start: now that a new record is in the history books, a frenzy of gold calls was bought, both for futures and the biggest ETF tied to the metal, and as shown in the chart below, the buildup of open interest between $2,000 and $2,500 has been relentless over the past week on growing optimism that rates are primed to decline. Next up for gold? $2500 or higher.

Yet not everyone had a great day: the dollar predictably tumbled, extending it losses for a third straight week, the longest streak since June, and comes after the dollar saw its worst month in a year this November.

One dollar pair trade where the convexity is especially high is USDJPY, which after soaring for much of the past year suddenly finds itself in a Wile E Coyote moment, trading just below the 100DMA. Should the selling persist, we may see the pair quickly tumble down to 140, or lower.

To be sure, not all the moves made sense: as Bloomberg noted, bonds have a better reason to rally than stocks, which have to factor in the growth concerns that underpin Powell’s remarks. Evidence is gathering that the economy is slowing and stocks will have to reconcile that with their bullish rate views. Today’s ISM Manufacturing data is case in point that the stagflationary slowing that started in October — and Bloomberg Economics says it’s observing typical early signs of recession — extended last month.

The ISM commentary was generally downbeat, equally split between companies hiring and others reducing their labor forces “a first since such comments have been tracked” according to Bloomberg.

But it gets worse: the latest update to the Atlanta GDPNOW tracker slipped to 1.2% from 1.8% yesterday and over 2% just last week.

And after diverging for much of the year, all three regional Feds that do GDP nowcasts have converged on 2% –  a far cry from the “5.2%” GDP print the Biden department of seasonal adjustments goalseeked last month.

Bottom line: the onus is now on the payrolls report next week to further guide markets into next year. The continued rise in ongoing jobless claims pose a risk that unemployment could rise further. But so far, this isn’t a consensus view, with economists projecting the unemployment rate to stay unchanged at 3.9% (and more see a 3.8% rate than 4%).

And while that may only add more fuel to the rate-cut speculation, at some point the softening in economic data will have to be squared with its impact on profits. As a reminder, while much of the interval between the last rate hike and the first rate cut is favorable for risk assets, the weeks right before the cut usually send stocks anywhere between 10% and 30% lower as the market realizes just why the Fed is panicking.

However, judging by today’s action, we still have some time before that particular rude awakening kicks in.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/01/2023 – 16:07

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/GFYjJhT Tyler Durden

Watch: Boat Full Of Suspected Migrants Invades Malibu Beach

Watch: Boat Full Of Suspected Migrants Invades Malibu Beach

A panga boat full of suspected migrants landed on the beach in Malibu, California earlier this week, after which a group of people can be seen exiting the vessel and trudging across the sand, according to video sent to Fox News‘ Bill Melugin by a resident.

Screenshot

Melugin notes that “Malibu is 100+ miles away from the border,” and that it’s “Unclear if anyone caught.”

Watch:

The incident happened the same week that LA media reported a sunken panga boat found off the same area on Wednesday, prompting an investigation from federal authorities.

The US Coast Guard was alerted to the 25-foot-long vessel at around 7:30 a.m. Wednesday, and found a debris field with life jackets and gas cans, but no people.

On Sunday, surfers at Black’s Beach in San Diego County walk past a boat believed to have been used in a human smuggling incident.
(Nelvin C. Cepeda / San Diego Union-Tribune)

In March, eight people died after two suspected human smuggling boats capsized near Black’s Beach in San Diego.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/01/2023 – 15:50

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/hX0vQLs Tyler Durden

Floating Down De Nile: Goldman Declares Hunter Biden Laptop May Be A Fake

Floating Down De Nile: Goldman Declares Hunter Biden Laptop May Be A Fake

Authored by Jonathan Turley via jonathanturley.org,

As Stuart Smiley said on SNL’s Daily Affirmation, “De Nile ain’t just a river in Egypt.” Democrat Rep. Dan Goldman, a member of the House Weaponization of Government committee, caused yet another firestorm of controversy in declaring that the Hunter laptop may be a fake.

That’s right. Despite media, American intelligence, and even other Democrats acknowledging the authenticity of the laptop, Goldman is still spreading denials . . . at a hearing on the weaponization of disinformation policies.

Goldman has previously been criticized for making the case against President Joe Biden in disastrous efforts to discredit whistleblowers.

As in past hearings, the Democrats opposed witnesses who tried to detail the growing evidence of a government-directed censorship system. Members like Delegate Stacey Plaskett (D-Virgin Islands) continued to deny that there was any evidence of such censorship after spending years opposing the investigation of the program. Even with thousands of pages of evidence and a federal judge finding an “Orwellian” censorship system, Plaskett and her colleagues simply denied that such evidence exists.

However, it was Goldman who stole the show in an exchange with  journalist Michael Shellenberger. Shellenberger referenced the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story before the election, a decision that Twitter and other companies now admit was wrong.

However, truth has never been a particularly appealing option for politicians, particularly when it must come with an acknowledgment of past culpability in spreading disinformation.

Recently, we discussed how Leon Panetta also doubled down recently on the claim that the laptop may still be Russian disinformation.

Goldman also opted for denial and distraction over honesty and transparency.

He told Shellenberger: “You’ve talked about the Hunter Biden laptop, and how the FBI knew it existed. You are aware, of course, that the laptop, so to speak, … that was published in the New York Post, was actually a hard drive that the New York Post admitted here was not authenticated as real…It was not the laptop the FBI had. You’re aware of that right?”

Shellenberger responded: “It was the same contents.”

Goldman shot back: “How do you know? You would have to authenticate it to know it was the same contents.”

Shellenger responded: “Are you suggesting the New York Post participated in a conspiracy to construct the contents of the Hunter Biden laptop?”

Goldman: “No, sir, the problem is that hard drives can be manipulated by Rudy Giuliani or Russia.”

Shellengberger: “But what’s the evidence that that happened?”

Goldman: “Well, there is actual evidence of it. But the point is, it’s not the same thing.”

Goldman then concluded with the bizarre claim that “I’m glad you agree with me, Mr. Shellenberger, that transparency is the most important thing.”

Goldman has yet to produce the “actual evidence” that the hard drives were changed by Giuliani or Russia.

Before the election, many of us noted that the files on the laptop were easily authenticated and were confirmed by the other parties involved in some of these exchanges.  Since then the most damaging emails and messages have been authenticated and are not being denied by the Bidens.

There is of course a term for such conspiracy theories used by Democrats to justify censorship: disinformation. Indeed, the Biden Administration is seeking the censorship of true information deemed “malinformation.”

As someone raised in a liberal, politically active Democratic family in Chicago, it is distressing to see the party continue the push for censorship and blacklisting. However, the effort to deny the authenticity of these emails is particularly chilling. The transfers of millions to the Biden family and related meetings have now been confirmed by witnesses, including some questioned by Goldman.

The fact that Goldman used a hearing on the weaponization of disinformation policies to spread disinformation is crushingly ironic.

This is why floating down “de Nile” remains one of the most treacherous paths in the world.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/01/2023 – 15:35

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/vEoyxhP Tyler Durden

New Video Reveals McDonald’s Secret Spinoff Restaurant Called “CosMc’s” 

New Video Reveals McDonald’s Secret Spinoff Restaurant Called “CosMc’s” 

McDonald’s has maintained a high level of secrecy about its new spinoff restaurant chain called “CosMc’s.” This small-format concept restaurant was first announced in July with very few details. However, fast-food-obsessed internet sleuths have revealed they found a CosMc’s under construction in Illinois. 

TikToker snackolatorwho posts only about junk food, recently shared a video showcasing what seems to be the construction of one of the first CosMc’s stores in Bolingbrook, Illinois.

“The kind of conventional thinking is that this is going to be something of a competitor to like Starbucks, where it’s going to focus on the McCafe stuff and the coffee and the drinks as opposed to serving burgers and fries, which makes even more sense when you realize that this CosMc’s is being built directly next to an existing McDonald’s,” snackolator said, who was quoted by Bussiness Insider

Here’s the video:

@snackolator I have no idea what CosMc’s will serve, but I’m very excited to find out what McDonald’s has up their sleeve for this new concept. Are you excited for this new chain? What are you hoping they have? #mcdonalds #mcdonaldslife #mcds #cosmc #cosmcs #fastfood #mccafe #fastfoodlife #macdonalds #newfastfood ♬ original sound – snackolator

 

The name for the new brand comes from CosMc’s, an intergalactic character in McDonald’s advertisements in the 1980s and 90s. 

In July, McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski told investors on a second-quarter earnings call that the new restaurant is a “small format concept with all the DNA of McDonald’s, but with its own unique personality.” 

The move for a CosMc spinoff restaurant comes as the fast-food giant has had huge success in driving sales with the revival of another McDonald’s mascot, Grimace. 

McDonald’s revival of advertisement characters from decades ago appears to be a great non-woke ad strategy. Remember, the company scrubbed “ESG” from its website months ago. 

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/01/2023 – 15:15

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/WsmlP9O Tyler Durden

Latin America On Edge As Venezuela’s Maduro Holds Referendum Whether To Invade Oil-Rich Neighbor Guyana

Latin America On Edge As Venezuela’s Maduro Holds Referendum Whether To Invade Oil-Rich Neighbor Guyana

In a move that has prompted many to wonder which is the bigger banana republic, Venezuela or the US, Joe Biden’s new BFF, Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro (who has promised to export a few barrels of oil to the US president – now that draining the SPR is no longer an option – to keep gas prices low ahead of the 2024 presidential election in exchange for sanction relaxation and defacto recognition by the White House that Maduro is the dictatorially “democratically” elected president of Venezuela, making a mockery of a decade of Western virtue-signaling sanctions), on Sunday Caracas is set to hold a referendum among Venezuelans on annexing (i.e., invading and taking over) a whopping 160,000 sq km of extremely oil-rich land in neighbouring Guyana.

Why now? Why only now when Caracas has for more than 200 years claimed rights over Essequibo, a vast swath of the territory Guyana? Simple: because as we said several days ago, it was only a few months ago that Maduro realized he has leverage over the US president of the “most powerful nation in the world” and get away with anything… even invading a sovereign nation.

Of course, (oil rich but extraction poor) Venezuela’s heightened interest at this expanse of Amazon jungle springs in part from its resource riches, including offshore oil deposits that have since 2019 made Guyana the world’s fastest-growing economy. Another reason lies closer to home for Venezuela’s strongman leader Nicolás Maduro: elections next year. But at the end of the day, had Biden not signed a smoky back-room deal with Maduro, admitting he needs the dictator’s oil in exchange for what appears to be a diplomatic blank check, none of this would have happened. Instead, we are now facing actual war between two nations which between them have some of the largest oil deposits in the world.

As the FT notes, the potential for Venezuela, an ally of Russia, to follow the referendum with an incursion into western-leaning Guyana has raised concerns in the region. Brazil this week said it had increased the military presence in its northern areas, which border both countries.

“On Sunday December 3, we will respond to the provocations of Exxon, the US Southern Command, and the president of Guyana with a people’s vote,” Maduro said during a broadcast of his weekly television program on November 20.

Guyana correctly fears that the referendum is be a pretext for a land grab, and has appealed to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to halt the referendum — a move that Caracas has rejected, though its claim to the land is largely internationally unrecognised.

It isn’t: on Friday, judges at the World Court on Friday ordered Venezuela to refrain from taking any action that would alter the situation on the ground. The court did not expressly forbid Venezuela to hold a planned Dec. 3 referendum over its rights to the region around the Esequibo river, the subject of the long-running border dispute, as Guyana  has requested. However, judges at the International Court of Justice – as the World Court is formally known – made clear that any concrete action to alter the status quo should be stopped.

“The court observes that the situation that currently prevails in the territory in dispute is that Guyana administers and exercises control over that area,” presiding judge Joan Donoghue said. “Venezuela must refrain from taking any action which would modify that situation,” she added

“This is a textbook example of annexation,” Paul Reichler, a US lawyer representing Guyana before the ICJ, said in The Hague last month, claiming that Venezuela was preparing a military build-up in the Essequibo region in case it wished to enforce the outcome of the referendum.

For its part, Caracas said that its troops were carrying out anti-illegal mining operations near the territory, a sparsely populated region that is home to about 200,000 Guyanese who speak English and indigenous languages, though little Spanish.

Meanwhile in pro-Maduro Brazil, local media reported that a senator for the state of Roraima said the defense minister had agreed to his requests for military reinforcements in the municipality of Pacaraima, a strategic location for access to Essequibo. The defence ministry said: “Defence actions have been intensified in the northern border region of the country, promoting a greater military presence.” It wasn’t immediately clear if Brazil’s socialist leader Lula is planning on aiding his comrade Maduro in invading and pillaging Guyana’s oil, but it would be par for the socialist course, especially when the US president is implicitly approving your actions.

That said, analysts question whether Venezuela will genuinely seek to annex the territory. They argue the referendum exercise is aimed at bolstering Maduro’s domestic support ahead of elections that Venezuela agreed to hold in exchange for relief from debilitating sanctions imposed by the US.

“Political calculations are driving Maduro to escalate tensions in an attempt to stir up nationalist sentiment, but those same political calculations also limit his military options,” said Theodore Kahn, director for the Andean region at the consultancy Control Risks.

“An actual invasion would shut the door to further negotiations with the US and force the Biden administration to reimpose oil sector sanctions.”

Come to think of it, that’s a joke of a deterrent, considering Maduro had no problem living with sanctions for years. If Maduro were to get his grubby hands on some of the most state of the art oil facilities in the world – as a reminder, Guyana is where Exxon has invested billions to extract much of the country’s oil- he would do so in a heartbeat.

Still, Maduro needs to mobilise party loyalists to defend two decades of socialist rule during which his party and its predecessors have turned Caracas into an international pariah, shattered its state-run oil industry, fueled mass emigration and empowered violent gangs.

Luis Vicente León, who runs Caracas-based research company Datanálisis, said the government was using the referendum to reduce the perceived impact of a pre-election primary held by the opposition in October despite government disapproval. The primary drew 2.4mn voters to the polls, well above expectations.

“It’s also a test of the government’s capacity to engage its political machinery and mobilise voters,” León said. “Alongside that, it pressures the opposition to take a position on a sensitive subject and gives [Maduro] a potential excuse to declare a state of emergency and avoid the election altogether.”

Maduro, in office since his firebrand predecessor Hugo Chávez died of cancer in 2013, has yet to officially announce his candidacy in the upcoming elections. However, he is widely expected to run despite approval ratings of just 20 per cent, according to Datanálisis, amid an economic and humanitarian crisis.

Hilarious, Maduro’s re-election in 2018 was regarded by the US and its allies as fraudulent, but so much has changed since then, well not that much: just Biden becoming president and folding to Maduro’s demands in exchange for oil. Seeking to entice him into allowing a “free and fair” election this time (please don’t laugh) the US last month relaxed sanctions on oil, gold and secondary financial markets for six months. The move followed a deal between Maduro and a US-backed faction of the opposition to resume political talks.

Yet hopes of a political opening were tempered when just days later, the government-backed Supreme Justice Tribunal suspended the results of the opposition primary, which was convincingly won by María Corina Machado.

Machado, a pro-market former lawmaker who once called for external military intervention in Venezuela, is banned from holding office at present, something she claims will not stop her from running.

While the government and the fractious opposition agree that the Essequibo region is part of Venezuela’s territory, Machado has said the referendum is a “distraction” that must be suspended. She advocates settling the dispute at the ICJ.

The referendum will put five questions to Venezuela’s public. One seeks approval for granting all residents of the Essequibo region Venezuelan citizenship and creating a new state within Venezuela, while another asks voters if they recognise the jurisdiction of the ICJ to rule on the matter. Both would likely lead to a military invasion.

In April, the ICJ ruled that it had jurisdiction to decide on the territorial dispute, following a request from Guyana in 2018 to confirm the border that was drawn in arbitration in 1899 between Venezuela and what was then British Guiana, a colony. A final ruling could take years, however.

“It is not an exaggeration to describe the current threat to Guyana as existential and the need for provisional measures as urgent,” Carl Greenidge, who leads Guyana’s delegation at the ICJ, told judges in The Hague with reference to the referendum.

A specialised US army delegation visited Guyana this week, and discussed “processes to enhance both countries’ military readiness and capabilities to respond to security threats,” said the US embassy in Georgetown. Bharrat Jagdeo, Guyana’s vice-president, said last week that “all the options available for us to defend our country will be pursued. Every option.”

Caracas has long held that the Essequibo river to the region’s east is its natural border, as it was during Spanish rule before 1899. But Venezuela’s interest in pressing that claim has fluctuated. In 2004, while seeking international support for his Bolivarian revolution, Chávez said in Guyana that Georgetown had the right to grant concessions in the Essequibo territory.

But since 2015, when ExxonMobil announced it had found oil beneath the waters off the Essequibo coast in the Stabroek Block, Caracas has adopted a more bellicose tone (well, of course).

In October this year, the US major — which leads a consortium producing oil in the South American country — made another find in the waters claimed by Venezuela. Drilling bids were awarded to companies including Exxon, French major Total, and local company Sispro. Francisco Monaldi, a Latin America energy expert at Rice University in Houston, said: “So far Exxon’s wells and discoveries are in the area north of Guyana’s undisputed land territory, but the awarded oil blocks do go into the disputed waters.”

Oil is transforming the Guyanese economy, which grew 62 per cent last year, according to the IMF, and is projected to expand another 37 per cent this year. With around 11bn barrels in reserves and a population of just 800,000, the country has the largest amount of oil per capita in the world.

Meanwhile, Venezuela has the world’s largest proven reserves, and in its heyday at the turn of the century pumped about 3mn barrels per day, but mismanagement, corruption and sanctions led production to collapse. In September this year, it pumped 735,000 bpd.

Exxon said that “border issues are for governments and appropriate international organisations to address”.

Still, we wouldn’t be surprised if Darren Woods is quietly putting together a mercenary army to quietly take out Maduro. It should cost him at most 2-3 days worth of oil extraction revenues.

 

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/01/2023 – 14:58

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/JgBm2rP Tyler Durden

Blackstone’s Flagship BREIT Gates Redemption Requests For 13 Consecutive Months

Blackstone’s Flagship BREIT Gates Redemption Requests For 13 Consecutive Months

Blackstone has limited investor redemption requests from its $64 billion commercial real estate trust for high-net wealth investors for the thirteenth consecutive month. However, the good news: the “backlog is easing,” according to Bloomberg. 

According to a shareholder letter, Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust (BREIT) recorded investor outflows of $1.8 billion in November. The fund fulfilled 67% of its requests, and demand redemptions fell to the lowest since September 2022. 

BREIT limits redemptions to 2% of net asset value monthly and 5% quarterly to curb sudden runs. This process of gating investors has been ongoing for 13 months due to surging fears of high interest rates and deteriorating conditions for commercial real estate markets. 

Recall: 

The fund is heavily invested in housing, such as multi-family and student housing, as well as industrial properties and data centers. 

Most of the properties are located in the southern and western portions of the US. 

Fund performance has been dampened by deteriorating macroeconomic conditions, only delivering 2.3% this year through October for high-net wealth investors. Last year, it delivered 8.4% in 2022. And since its inception, it has routinely delivered 11.3% annual returns. 

The good news, as explained by a Blackstone spokesperson: Investors who requested to pull their money out of the fund two months ago have received “nearly all” their money back. 

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/01/2023 – 14:35

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/PXipdMc Tyler Durden